A civil law/Roman law country is a country whose laws attempt to write out regulations and rules for as many situations and actions as possible.
The nature of constitutional law. Within the broadest feel, a constitution is a body of rules governing the affairs of an organized group.
A constitutional republic means that it's far one wherein, in preference to immediate governing, the people choose a number of their individuals to serve in the political workplace temporarily; the constitutional part way that each of the citizens and their governing officials is bound to follow the rules set up in that constitution.
Learn more about laws here https://brainly.com/question/820417
#SPJ4
If you were on trial for a crime and were asked by the prosecutor where you were on the night the crime was committed, which of the following rights could you invoke to protect you from testifying against yourself?
A. the Third Amendment
B. the First Amendment
C. the Fifth Amendment
D. the Tenth Amendment
examples of misleading
Fundamentally, the supreme court decisions in baker v. Carr and reynolds v. Sims were based on the principle of.
Fundamentally, the supreme court decisions in baker v. Reynolds v. Sims set up that the identical safety Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment requires each house of the state legislature to be apportioned primarily based on the populace.
In Reynolds v. Sims (1964), the use of the very best court's precedent set in Baker v. Carr (1962), Warren held that representation in country legislatures ought to be apportioned similarly on the basis of the populace rather than geographical regions, remarking that “legislators represent human beings, no longer acres or trees.
In Reynolds v. united states of America, ninety-eight U.S. one hundred forty-five (1879), the ultimate court ruled unanimously that a federal law prohibiting polygamy did no longer violate the unfastened workout clause of the primary modification. The courtroom's decisions become a few of the first to preserve that the free exercise of faith isn't absolute.
Learn more about Reynolds here:
https://brainly.com/question/26760046
#SPJ4
Explain the pros and cons of making a plea bargain as opposed to going to trial. Make sure to discuss the pros and cons from BOTH the prosecutor's and defense attorney's perspective as well as that of the defendant.
Concerning making a plea bargain as opposed to going to trial:
The Pros of plea bargain are: more likely lesser charge, lighter sentence, getting everything over with quickly etcThe Cons of plea bargain are: the innocent will can be induced to plead guilty, convictions of innocent people etc.What is known as plea bargaining?In the law sphere, a plea bargaining refers to the practice of negotiating an agreement between the prosecution & defense party whereby the defendant pleads guilty to a lesser offense or to more of the offenses charged in an exchange for more lenient sentencing, recommendations, specific sentence, dismissal of charges etc.
Most often, the supporters of a plea bargaining claim that it speeds court proceedings and guarantees a conviction whereas the opponents plea bargaining believe that it prevents justice from being served.
Also, a plea bargains are not always easy to recognize. The negotiations that result in a formal agreements are called the explicit plea bargains while the some are called implicit plea bargains because they involve no guarantee of leniency.
Read more about plea bargaining
brainly.com/question/19557127
#SPJ1
If an individual is a least ________ years old but under the age of 18, their driving privileges are subject to suspension or postponement for a graffiti conviction.
If an individual is the least graffiti years old but under the age of 18, their driving privileges are subject to suspension or postponement for a graffiti conviction.
Riding is not a constitutional proper. You get your driver's license based totally on the talents you've got and the policies you compromise to observe. after you get your driving license you must keep illustrating your capacity to force thoroughly on the street.
Driving is a privilege, now not proper. the ones granted the privilege have met certain situations, consisting of being a citizen of a positive age, and conforming to abide by way of certain necessities, which includes obeying the rules of the street.
In a few cases, you can qualify to request constrained driving privileges after serving the “difficult time” suspension required under Ohio law. This hard time can be as little as 15 days for first offenders who test at or slightly above the legal restriction.
Learn more about driving privileges here:
https://brainly.com/question/27834080
#SPJ4
Is a coup d’ etat considered force majeure? Discuss its legal implications to the hotel industry which might be used as headquarters in case of military takeover.
The Brazilian Revolt of 1930: A military coup d'état that overthrew President Washington coup d'etat and installed the Brazilian military junta of 1930 followed an armed revolution.
The crime of coup d'etat is a sudden the assault accompanied by violence, intimidation, threat, strategy, or stealth, directed the against duly elected government officials in the Philippines military, as well as any military camp or installation, communications network, public utilities, or other facilities required for the exercise. "A sudden attempt by a small group of people to the take control of the government, the typically via violence," is what a coup d'état is.
To learn more about military, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/28357806
#SPJ1
in general, how many peremptory challenges are available to attorneys in noncapital cases when choosing a jury?
In general there are six peremptory challenges that are available to attorneys in noncapital cases when choosing a jury.
Six challenges are permitted for each defendant. Each defendant is eligible for six challenges from the State. In addition to any unused challenges, each side is allowed one peremptory challenge for each alternate juror.In both American and Australian law, the attorneys have the option to disqualify a specified number of potential jurors during the jury selection process without providing a justification.Unless the opposing side makes a prima facie case that the peremptory challenge was used to discriminate on the basis of color, ethnicity, or sex, the potential juror is excluded without the necessity for a cause or an explanation. one of the few unique jury challenges each party was granted prior to trial.Thus the answer is six.
Refer here to learn more about peremptory challenges: https://brainly.com/question/1858186
#SPJ4
which kinds of cases involve intermediate scrutiny?
Intermediate scrutiny is used only when a state or the federal government passes a law that harms certain protected classes.
Intermediate scrutiny is a test that courts will use to determine the constitutionality of a statute. Intermediate scrutiny is used only when a state or the federal government passes a law that harms certain protected classes. In the context of freedom of speech, intermediate scrutiny is the test or benchmark of review that courts use when comparing content-neutral speech to content-based speech. Speech based on content is subjected to rigorous scrutiny.
When it comes to gender bias under the Equal Protection Clause, we typically encounter intermediate scrutiny. It also needs to apply to some First Amendment issues that are not covered in this course.
Learn more on Intermediate scrutiny-
https://brainly.com/question/13038239
#SPJ4
Working together to uncover unethical behavior, cynthia cooper’s auditing team members were probably able to give each other emotional support that would be considered.
Working together to uncover unethical behavior, cynthia cooper’s auditing team members were probably able to give each other emotional support that would be considered: Positive reinforcement.
What is positive reinforcement?Positive reinforcement can be defined as the process or way of making use of a reinforcer to change an unwanted or unacceptable behavior to a behavior that is acceptable or to a desirable behavior .
A person or an individual can tend to make use of reward as a reinforcer as this can help to change the behavior of a person based on the fact whenever the positive behavior is achieved or exhibited the reward will be a reinforcer so as to encourage the person to always behave in the way we want them to behave.
Therefore we can conclude that Cynthia auditing team are making use of what is called positive reinforcer.
Learn more about positive reinforcement here: https://brainly.com/question/15095384
#SPJ1
a sentence with a fixed minimum and maximum term of incarceration , rather than a set period of time is known as
Instead of a predetermined length of time, an indeterminate sentence has a definite minimum and maximum term of incarceration.
In terms of the law, a "indeterminate sentence" is a term of imprisonment with no set end date but a permitted maximum. The parole authority chooses who is qualified for parole. In this regard incarceration, an indeterminate sentence varies from a definite one in that regulations dictating the latter typically provide for parole eligibility after a specific percentage of the complete term—in most nations, from one-half to two-thirds of the initial sentence.
During the last quarter of the 19th century's reformatory movement, indeterminate sentence were invented. Rather than a sentence handed down by a judge, release was based on how well the incarceration training program was going. As of right now, the parole authorities, field parole officers, and prison staff are the ones that propose a person be released on parole after serving an indeterminate sentence.
Learn more about indeterminate sentence here
https://brainly.com/question/7202734
#SPJ4
A company may be able to use the trademark of another business if they
have a
Permission slip
O court order
O license
O VPN
Answer:
The answer that would make the most sense is the license.
Explanation:
Think about licensed items, ex. A baseball cap.
The team is trademarked but the company producing merchandise of it is independent. All with the help of a license.
Compare and contrast national security before and after 9/11.
The national security after 9/11 is one where there is No boarding pass or ID required when going to the gate, it was allowed to have 4-inch-blade knives aboard planes, the security before the 9/11 can be seen in a way that Travelers need to pass through metal detectors.
What was the 9/11 attack?The 9/11 attack can be described as the attack that was been carried out on the united states of America by the militant Islamic extremist network al-Qaeda.
It should be noted that this attack actually affected the security as well as the economy of the united states which took them some time before they actually recovered.
Learn more about 9/11 attack at:
https://brainly.com/question/27720927
#SPJ1
Should some citizens bear more responsibility in a society then others?
Answer ASAP
giving brainliest
Grounds for U.S. courts to hear a case arises from matters of federal law or U.S. constitution, This is more commonly known as:
O Majority opinions
O Federal questions
O Stare decisis
O Common law
O None of the above
Explanation: can only be heard if they are authorized by the Constitution or federal statutes
knowledge of falsity and reckless disregard for the truth are two elements of the legal concept called
Actual malice is defined by the Supreme Court as actual knowledge that the statement is false or reckless disregard for the truth. This means you made a claim understanding it was false and then published it.
Actual Malice
This means you either published a statement knowing it was false or acted with reckless disregard for the statement's truth or falsity. Courts deciding whether you acted with actual malice consider your state of mind at the time you made the defamatory statement.
In defamation claims, the reckless disregard for truth element requires a plaintiff to demonstrate that the defendant had grave reservations about the precision of the material.
Learn more on Actual malice-
https://brainly.com/question/8961894
#SPJ4
the doctrine that is applied when a defendant violates an existing statute intended to prevent the injury in question to persons of a class that includes the plaintiff is:
The doctrine of negligence per se is used when a defendant transgresses a law that was put in place to protect people in the plaintiff's class from the alleged harm.
What exactly is negligence per se?In cases of negligence, it is necessary to demonstrate that there was a duty, that duty was violated, and that the violation resulted in damages. It is not possible to sue someone for negligence in isolation. However, negligence as a whole takes on the obligation due to public law or policy.
According to legal scholars, "negligence per se" is "negligence resulting from the breach of a public duty under a law that defines the failure of care required to constitute negligence." It is also considered negligence per se when a person acts or refrains from acting in a manner that is so at variance with reasonable behavior standards as to be negligent on its face.
Learn more about negligence per se with the help of the given link:
brainly.com/question/1445831
#SPJ4
A match used to start an arson fire aligns with a book of matches found in a suspect’s pocket.
Is this class or individual evidence? Explain.
Answer:
Explanation:
A match used to start an arson fire aligns with a book of matches found in a suspect’s pocket.
Is this class or individual evidence? Explain.
Suppose a law has been declared unconstitutional. What can be done to try to make it constitutional?.
Answer:
This scenario means that some judicial court, state level, municipal (county), federally, or the Supreme Court, has said a law violates the constitution. If the Supreme Court does this, nothing can be done besides writing a new law that is constitutionally sound. If any court besides for the Supreme Court rules a law as unconstituional, one can appeal their case that the law actually is constitutional to the Supreme Court or any higher level court. I.e. a state court rules a law unconstitutional, the Supreme Court or federal appellate court for that district can hear an appeal.
Explanation:
Striations on a bullet recovered from a crime scene line up with striations from a bullet test fired from a suspect’s gun. Is this class or individual evidence? Explain.
Answer:
class evidence
Explanation:
it is a classic evidence
TRUE OR FALSE: To assess a threat, you should
ignore behavior and focus on WHO the person is-
age, appearance, race, ethnicity, nationality,
gender, etc.
O True
O False
Answer:
False, because there's many ways to assess a threat than focus on what the person really is.
A. Why is a comparative analysis of democratic nations useful for academics and policymakers?
B. Analyze the common methodological strategies used by political scientists in the comparative analysis of nations and politics. In other words, why are these strategies appropriately selected?
C. How effective is each methodological strategy in analyzing real-world political outcomes
Comparative analysis of democratic nations useful for academics and policymakers because it centres on politics around a method, not a particular object of study which widens the scope of the beneficiary.
The common methodological strategies used by political scientists is comparative method. The comparative method is important to political science because the other main scientific methodologies are more difficult to employ.
How effective is each methodological strategy in analyzing real-world political outcomes?Experiments are very difficult to carry out in political science. There seems not to be the level of recurrence and exactness in politics as there is in the natural world.
The statistical method is employed more often in political science, however, it requires mathematical manipulation of quantitative data over a large number of cases. The higher the number of cases, the stronger one inferences from the data. For a smaller number of cases, like countries, of which there is a limited number, the comparative method may be superior to statistical methodology.
Summarily, the comparative method is useful to the study of politics in smaller cases that require comparative analysis between variables.
Therefore, the correct answer is as given above.
learn more about comparative method: https://brainly.com/question/236981
#SPJ1
Neil is building a new home. Jasper is neil’s contractor. The plans for the new house require that a fence on the edge of neil’s property be torn down because the new house will extend ten feet beyond the fence. Jasper tears down the fence and starts marking out the framework for the foundation of the new house. Neil’s neighbor, jasmine, sues neil and jasper for trespass to property because that land is actually jasmine’s property, a fact that neil knew all along. Can both neil and jasper be held liable for trespass to property?.
Yes, Neil and Jasper can both be held liable for trespass to property.
What is trespassing?Threats, assault, battery, wounding, mayhem (or maiming), and wrongful imprisonment were the six distinct transgressions that historically made up trespass to the person. The majority of jurisdictions now broadly recognize three trespasses to the person: assault, battery, and false imprisonment. Assault is defined as "any act of such a nature as to excite an apprehension of battery"; battery is defined as "any intentional and unpermitted contact with the plaintiff's person or anything attached to it and practically identified with it"; and battery is defined as "any intentional and unpermitted contact with the plaintiff's person or anything attached to it and practically identified with.
To learn more about trespassing visit:
https://brainly.com/question/15302881
#SPJ13
- I need help with this question but no one is helping me! Can someone please help me! I need 200 words for both parts 1 and 2, thanks a lot.
Answer:
If I were the prosecuting attorney, I would charge Darla with first degree murder, and Lincoln with accessory after the fact to first degree murder. However, I would cut a deal with both Tommy and Lincoln to testify against the teacher, Darla. Although Tommy did commit and was found guilt of a murder, Tommy is only fifteen years old. He was also seduced, manipulated, and touched by his teacher. In all 50 states of the United States of America, the age of consent is 16, 17, or 18. This means that in all 50 states, Darla is also guilty of statutory r a p e, along with multiple states having even harsher punishments for adults who use their role as an educator, coesunelor, or parental guardian to se xually take advantage of a minor. As a prosecuting attorney, I would charge Darla with first degree murder, and go after her as the prime target. Tommy can have his sentenced reduced. As Darla's defense attorney, the entire case against her is circumstantial and lies solely on the testimony of especially Tommy and also Lincoln. I can argue that Darla, never told Tommy to kill her husband, but that she just informed Tommy the only way they could be together forever is if her husband was out of the picture. Tommy easily could have located the firearm in her house, take the gun, and then killed her husband so that he could be with his teacher forever. The entire case lies on a jury believing a convicted murderer, or a teacher who at this point, has no criminal record that we know of.
Explanation:
Kim Buyer is purchasing a home. The purchase Price for the home is $125,000. Kim is obtaining a loan for acme loan company for $105,000. What is the amount of title insurance that Kim can purchase? What is the amount of title insurance the Acme loan company can purchase?
When purchasing a home is done by Kim at a cost of $125,000, and the loan is also taken by Kim at a rate of 8.4%, the total amount that was paid by Kim is $105,000.
What does loan mean?Giving money to someone else in exchange for repayment of the principal plus interest is known as a loan. Before agreeing to issue a loan to a potential borrower, lenders will take into account their income, credit score, and debt load.
Owner Kim is required to acquire $125,000 worth of title insurance because that is the exact price Kim paid for the property. The loan business set aside $105,000 for Kim when she applied for a loan, which is 8.4% less than the property's true value.
Learn more about loan from here:
https://brainly.com/question/11794123
#SPJ1
Matt has been a runner for several years but has never participated in a marathon. He decides to make that his goal, training hard to ready himself. Matt isn’t interested in where he places in the race, just that he is able to accomplish his goal. According to Freud’s theories, what part of Matt’s personality is behind this self-improvement?
A.
id
B.
ego
C.
empathy
D.
superego
Based on the fact that Matt wants to accomplish his goal of running the marathon, the part of his personality behind this self-improvement is the B. ego.
What are the parts of Freudian Personality?According to famed psychologist, Sigmund Freud, the personality of a person is framed by three parts which are the Id, the Ego and the Superego.
The Id is the part of a human that is most animal like. It seeks immediate gratification from pleasurable activities and so is not capable of thinking in the long term.
The ego is the part that has to make decisions for the person and it does this by balancing the demands of the Id and the demands of the Superego in various proportions.
The Superego is the morally upright part of a person's personality and will judge them when they don't meet these morals.
Because the ego is the one that makes decisions, it is most likely the part that is behind the self-improvement drive of Matt.
Find out more on Freud's parts of personality at https://brainly.com/question/7185941
#SPJ1
Which state-level agencies are responsible for providing technical support to local agencies, such as laboratory analysis or record services?.
State-level agencies are responsible for providing technical support to local agencies, such as laboratory analysis or record services to federal regulation enforcement agencies as nicely.
Federal, national, county, and municipal regulation enforcement agencies. Federal law enforcement companies legally part of the executive department of the U.S. authorities, are unbiased of other regulation enforcement corporations and of legislative and judicial agencies.
There are essentially 3 sorts of regulation enforcement businesses, nearby, kingdom, and federal. nearby law enforcement companies consist of police and sheriff departments. kingdom organizations encompass the country or highway patrol. Federal corporations consist of the FBI and the U.S. secret provider.
Learn more about Federal regulation here
https://brainly.com/question/25563981
#SPJ4
1)In what ways is the concept of Due Process and the Rule of Law connected? Where are examples of this in the U.S. Constitution.
2) Describe the four central issues of the Rights of the Accused. Describe a scenario that could come up in the future that would fall into one of these central issues that is not discussed in the article.
3) What are the critical protections needed to ensure Due Process in America? Are those reflected in the Constitution or should there be an amendment added to ensure Due Process.
hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
1a: The Fundamental values and laws of a country, state, or social group that define the roles and responsibilities of the government and provide certain protections for its citizens. b: a document that encapsulates a political or social organization's regulations.
What connections exist between the ideas of due process and the rule of law? Where can one find examples of this in America? Constitution.No one shall be "deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law," according to the Fifth Amendment, and the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, enacted in 1868, utilizes the same eleven words to describe a duty on all states.
What are the accused's four rights?The Sixth Amendment ensures the rights of criminal defendants, including the right to an unbiased jury, the right to a public trial without undue delay, the right to counsel, and the right to know the identity of your accusers as well as the specifics of the allegations and supporting documentation.
How do you imagine the future?Decide on the main problem or query.
Think about business aspects that might have an impact on the main issue.
Describe the outside factors that will affect the problem.
Make a list of the important uncertainties.
Limit the potential futures.
Describe each selected situation in its entirety.
What essential safeguards are required to guarantee due process in America?An impartial court.
Notification of the proposed action and the claimed justifications.
Opportunity to discuss arguments against the suggested action.
A person's ability to present evidence, particularly their ability to summon witnesses.
The right to be aware of contrary evidence.
The ability to question opposing witnesses directly.
Are issues addressed under the Constitution, or is a new amendment necessary to guarantee due process?Overview. A citizen must be given notice, an opportunity to be heard, and a decision by an impartial decision-maker when the federal government takes a course of action that robs them of their life, liberty, or property interest. This is known as procedural due process.
To Know more about Fundamental
https://brainly.com/question/2224584
#SPJ13
bijli bacho
hindi..................
hola explica bien qué no capto tu pregunta
One of the "Four P's" is to project a
professional image. Which of the following
items is NOT a key component of a
customer friendly image?
a. Personal appearance
b. Fancy jewelry
c. Eye contact
d. Smile
If you were a candidate for the US House of Representatives this fall, what one issue would be most important to you?
Someone is the part of the US House of Representatives this fall, are the main issues was the jobs and the economy system.
What is House of Representatives?
The Senate and the House of the Representative was the important part of the Congress. The House of the Representative are the cabinet members are the rises of the issues and the remedies of the solving the disputes.
According to the House of the Representative, the member are the mostly rises on the issues are the economy related issues included the employment, healthcare system, and the education system. The candidate for the US House of the Representative are included this kind of the issues.
Hence, the significance of the House of Representatives, aforementioned.
Learn more about on House of Representatives, here:
https://brainly.com/question/747415
#SPJ1
