Option E is Correct. It falls under the Intentional category of tort when a tortfeasor willfully causes an incident that results in harm.
A tortfeasor is a person who commits a tort; this person is "liable" rather than guilty. The purpose of tort liability is to compensate the tort victim financially for the harm that the tortfeasor inflicted. There are further remedies available, such as injunctions or restitution.
When the defendant's activities were disproportionately risky, negligent torts occurred. Strict liability torts, in contrast to deliberate and negligent torts, are independent of the level of care that the defendant used. Courts in strict liability instances instead concentrate on whether a specific outcome or harm manifested. A sort of liability known as "fault" requires the plaintiff to demonstrate that the defendant's actions were at fault.
Learn more about tortfeasor Visit: brainly.com/question/28136021
#SPJ4
Correct Question:
When a tortfeasor is willful in bringing about a particular event that caused harm, it falls into which category of tort?
A) None of these
B) Partial liability
C) Negligence
D) Strict liability
E) Intentional
which reason explains a purpose of the northwest ordinance of 1787?
Enslavement is the reason that explains the purpose of the northwest ordinance of 1787.
What was the northwest ordinance of 1787?
The Northwest Ordinance was the first law to establish a framework by which new territories could follow a three-step legal path to become a state equal to the original 13 states and was the first significant action by Congress to address the issue of enslavement. It was ratified by Congress on July 13, 1787. A Bill of Rights-style provision that outlined individual rights in the new regions was also included in the law. Some of the rights were also included in the Bill of Rights, which was eventually incorporated into the U.S. Constitution.
To learn more about northwest ordinance of 1787 visit;
https://brainly.com/question/514277
#SPJ4
______ laws are made to protect the public as a whole from the harmful acts of others.
Criminal laws are made to protect the public as a whole from the harmful acts of others.
These laws make it illegal to commit certain acts that are deemed to be against society’s morals. These laws are enforced by the police, courts and other law enforcement agencies.
They are designed to deter potential criminals from committing crimes, as well as to punish those who do break the law. Criminal laws can be found in the criminal codes of each state or country, as well as in international treaties.
To learn more about Criminal laws link is here
brainly.com/question/1205493
#SPJ4
if the government becomes destructive what should happen?
It is the right of the people to change or abolish any form of government if it becomes harmful to these purposes (life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness) and to enact new forms of governance.
This is a well-known quotation from Thomas Jefferson, and the phrase "whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends" means that:
According to the Declaration's fourth and last self-evident truth, citizens of a country have the right to organize a revolution if their government violates rather than protects their unalienable rights. The people have the right to overthrow such a government and install a new one that will behave in a way that would offer them safety and pleasure if the government is unable to achieve that.
To learn more about government becomes destructive visit;
https://brainly.com/question/28040371
#SPJ4
the chief justice of the supreme court who ruled in favor of the cherokee nation was?
The verdict in favor of the Cherokee people was given by Chief Justice John Marshall of the Supreme Court. Major Ridge, a well-known Cherokee politician, served as the leader of this purported "Treaty Party" in favor of deportation.
John Ross, the senior Cherokee chief, led the majority of the Cherokees who rejected relocating. For approximately forty years, John Ross led the Cherokee People as their chief, and it was during this time that the tribe went through some of its most difficult circumstances.
His primary role during the bitter factional struggle over the decision to settle in Indian Territory in the 1830s is what made him most famous (Oklahoma). The US Supreme Court ruled the Cherokee Nation to be sovereign in Georgia.
Learn more about Cherokee Visit: brainly.com/question/2297390
#SPJ4
Your attorney says that you have the preponderance of the evidence in your civil case. How do you interpret that statement?
O You are expected to win. The majority of facts and evidence provide support for your claim.
O You are expected to lose. The majority of facts and evidence support the claim of the other party.
O You are expected to win. The facts and evidence from the other party have been ruled inadmissable.
O You are expected to lose. The facts and evidence supporting your claim have been ruled inadmissable.
According to the preponderance standard, the burden of proof is satisfied when the party presenting it persuades the fact-finder that the claim has a higher than 50% chance of being true. In a civil trial, the burden of proof is this.
What is preponderance standard ?To establish anything by a majority of the evidence is to merely demonstrate that it is more probable than not. Do you think that each part of his or her [claim/counterclaim] is more likely to be true than false in light of the evidence and the law, to put it another way?
When presented with contradictory probabilities regarding a circumstance, a cautious man will proceed under the assumption that the real fact exists unless, after assessing the various possibilities, he decides that the preponderance is in favour of another course of action.
Hence option B is correct .
Learn more about preponderance here
https://brainly.com/question/30300287
#SPJ9
Answer:
You are expected to win. The majority of facts and evidence provide support for your claim.
Explanation: got it right on my law studies exam
antitrust laws have been implemented by governments to promote
Both the federal and state governments employ antitrust laws to foster business competition.
Antitrust laws are rules that promote competition by restricting a firm's ability to dominate the market. Without government-enacted antitrust regulations, certain businesses would restrict competition and move towards monopolies. Antitrust laws prevent market participants from working together to fix prices or engage in other anti-competitive behavior against consumers. These antitrust rules specifically forbid cartel formation and the concentration of economic power in a small number of hands. Therefore, antitrust laws are enforced to foster competition rather than price fixing, monopolies, or bid rigging.
Read more about Antitrust laws visit;
brainly.com/question/13800256
#SPJ4
1. Questions: a. What was the primary goal of the Catholic church and monarchy of Spain, Portugal, and England? What did they have to gain? b. What are the 7 laws? c. What are the principles of life as quoted by Shawnee Chief Tecumseh, which of these 7 Laws and principles do you believe hold the most efficacy in your life?
The primary goal of the Catholic Church and monarchies of Spain, Portugal, and England was to propagate Christianity, promote their own unique faith, and strengthen their political and economic dominance.
The seven commandments of the Catholic Church were to respect God and the Catholic Church, regard the Congregation and the Lords, act with good cause and modesty, keep the Congregation's guidelines, show love for consecrated objects, notice the Sabbath as a blessed day, and be consistent with one's mate.
Shawnee Boss Tecumseh's everyday routine goals were to regard all experiencing things, live as one with nature, maintain one's statement, regard the convictions of others, act with boldness and honesty, and try to develop a superior future.
Learn more about monarchies:
https://brainly.com/question/1430440
#SPJ4
identify the examples of conflicts of interest that can arise as a consequence of interlocking directorates.
Salary and benefits, theft of company property, self-dealing, exploitation of corporate possibilities, insider trading, and neglect of board duties are only a few examples of major conflicts of interest.
What could possibly be wrong with interconnected directorates?Interlocking directorates are typically a problem that is harmful for both enterprises and the director. If a board member joins the board of a competing company, they will likely have access to proprietary information, which promotes unfair competition.
What makes for a good example of overlapping directorates?If a firm purchases another company and one of its executives or directors is a member of the boards of directors or a director of both companies, for example, there may be a conflict of interest with the interlocking directorates. The shareholders or other board members frequently elect or nominate the members of the board of directors.
Learn more about Interlocking directorates: https://brainly.com/question/8467990
#SPJ1
how fairly can a national cake be shared?
The national cake should be shared in a way that benefits all citizens, regardless of their social, economic, or political status.
National Cake and how it can be shared fairlyThe fairness of sharing a national cake depends on various factors, including the size of the said cake, the number of people who need to share it, and the distribution of resources and wealth in the country. Ideally, a national cake should be shared in a way that benefits all citizens, regardless of their social, economic, or political status.
One approach to sharing the national cake fairly is to use progressive taxation, where the wealthy pay a higher percentage of their income in taxes than those with lower incomes. This helps to ensure that the burden of supporting the country's infrastructure, services, and programs is shared more equitably. Additionally, the government can invest in programs that support the most vulnerable populations, such as education, healthcare, and affordable housing, to help reduce inequality and provide opportunities for all citizens to succeed.
However, the reality is that in many countries, the national cake is not shared fairly.
Some factors impeding on the fair sharing include:
Corruptionpolitical favoritismand economic inequalityThese can all contribute to a situation where certain groups receive a disproportionate share of the national wealth. In such cases, it is important for citizens to engage in activism and advocacy, to hold their elected officials accountable and push for reforms that promote fairness and equality.
Learn more about corruption here https://brainly.com/question/472198
#SPJ1
this amendment abolished slavery within the united states, or any place subject to their jurisdiction. what is that amendment ?
The amendment that has led to the abolishment of slavery in the United States of America, or any place under its jurisdiction conducting the practice, is known as the thirteenth amendment.
The thirteenth amendment of the national American constitution has been implemented with an intention to hold the regulations related to strict prohibition over the practice of slavery in the United States and the jurisdictions related thereto. The thirteenth amendment has been an integral inclusion in the constitution ever since it has been brought into enforcement.
Learn more about thirteenth amendment here:
https://brainly.com/question/12879864
#SPJ4
QUESTION 1
All of these are ways to express a legal description EXCEPT
a. rectangular survey.
b. benchmarks.
c. lot and block.
d.metes and bounds.
All of these are ways to express a legal description EXCEPT benchmarks. Option B
Ways to express a legal description
A benchmark is a point of reference for surveying or mapping, often a physical mark on a permanent object such as a building or monument.
The method of expressing a legal description that is NOT one of the ways is "benchmarks."
While benchmarks may be used in the process of creating a legal description, they are not typically considered a method of expressing the description itself.
The other three methods listed are ways to express a legal description:
a. Rectangular survey: A rectangular survey is a system of surveying land in a grid pattern, with each parcel of land described by its location in the grid.
b. Lot and block: A lot and block system is a method of describing a parcel of land by its location within a subdivision or plat, often using a map or plan of the subdivision.
c. Metes and bounds: The metes and bounds system is a method of describing a parcel of land by its boundaries and physical landmarks, often using measurements and angles to define the boundaries.
Hence, the correct answer is benchmarks.
Learn more about legal description at:https://brainly.com/question/24257457
#SPJ1
Family A thinks family B is not entitled to a portion of the land because they are not the biological children of the ancestor whose land is in disputes. But family disagrees because they think they were adopted by the ancestor and therefore
her children also. A) diagnoses the nature of the family dispute, is it verbal or substantive?
b) identifies the source of disagreement?
c) outline your approaches to bringing peace between the two groups
A) The nature of the family dispute is substantive.
B) The source of the disagreement is over the entitlement to the land based on biological or adopted relationship with the ancestor.
C) Approaches to bringing peace between the two groups could include mediating the dispute with a neutral third party, exploring options for a compromise or cooperative solution, or engaging in a collaborative dialogue to better understand each other's perspectives and needs.
Family B may have a valid claim to the land if they can provide evidence that they were adopted by the ancestor whose land is in dispute. Adoption is a legal process and would be documented. If they can prove that they were adopted by the ancestor, they would likely be entitled to a portion of the land.
Both families should consider consulting a lawyer to help them settle the dispute. Additionally, if the dispute involves legal matters, both families may benefit from seeking legal counsel.
To learn more about legal counsel link is here
brainly.com/question/30061988
#SPJ4
how did european labor systems differ from chinese labor systems
The European labor systems were more focused on feudalism and capitalist wage labor, while the Chinese labor systems were more focused on corvée labor and indentured labor.
The European labor systems and the Chinese labor systems had significant differences, as explained below.
European Labor Systems:
Chinese Labor Systems:
Chinese labor systems were predominantly based on the corvée labor system, where peasants were required to provide labor services to the state or to landlords for a certain number of days each year.The Chinese labor systems also included the use of indentured labor, where individuals were contracted to work for a specified period of time in exchange for payment of debts or for transportation to a new country.Learn more about Chinese labor systems brainly.com/question/11369715
#SPJ11
in order to gain support for his cause, what did governor eugen talmadge argue?
In order to gain support for his cause, Governor Eugene Talmadge of Georgia advocated for white supremacy and segregation.
He was a controversial figure in the mid-20th century. In order to gain support for his cause, Talmadge argued on several points, including:
1. States' Rights: Talmadge believed in the concept of states' rights, which asserted that the federal government should have limited power and that individual states should have more control over their own affairs.
2. Segregation: Talmadge was a staunch supporter of segregation and argued that it was necessary to maintain the social order in the South.
He believed that black people were inferior to whites and that they should be kept separate from white people in all aspects of life, including education, housing, and public accommodations.
3. White Supremacy: Talmadge believed that white people were inherently superior to black people and that it was the duty of white people to maintain their dominance over society.
He argued that black people should not be allowed to hold positions of power or influence and that they should be denied the right to vote.
Overall, Talmadge's arguments were rooted in racism and discrimination, and his views were widely condemned by civil rights activists and other progressive voices of his time.
To know more about Governor Eugene Talmadge here:
https://brainly.com/question/14418703
#SPJ4
In what situations does the ucc overrule common law?
The UCC overrules common law as UCC applies to contracts that sell goods.
What benefit does the UCC provide?
The ability to receive payment is enhanced by a UCC filing, which establishes you as a secured creditor. The first right to reclaim your inventory or technology in the event of failure or bankruptcy is also provided by the filing of a promissory note security interest.
Common law is superseded by the UCC when it comes to contracts for the sale of goods. Contractual agreements involving physical assets like real land, services, insurance, and employment are governed by common law.
Therefore, The UCC governs agreements for the trade of commodities, and legal systems are superseded by it.
Learn more about UCC from the given link.
https://brainly.com/question/13640672
#SPJ1
state courts cannot have concurrent jurisdiction with federal courts. true/false
True. Federal courts and state courts cannot share concurrent jurisdiction. Even when a federal court has jurisdiction, state law matters may not be decided by federal trial courts inside a particular state.
The most suitable court site for a case is determined by the venue. Federal courts and state courts cannot share concurrent jurisdiction. When two or more courts from various legal systems simultaneously hold jurisdiction over a certain case, this is known as concurrent jurisdiction.
The parties will attempt to have their civil or criminal action heard in the court they believe will be most favorable to them, which frequently results in forum shopping. The ability of two or more courts from various jurisdictions to hear the cases mentioned below is referred to.
Learn more about jurisdiction Visit: brainly.com/question/10377896
#SPJ4
What feature of Judaism is different from the religions of ancient Greece and Rome?
One major feature of Judaism that is different from the religions of ancient Greece and Rome is its monotheistic belief in one God.
In contrast, the ancient Greek and Roman religions were polytheistic, meaning that they believed in many gods and goddesses.
Judaism also places a strong emphasis on ethical behavior and the importance of following God's laws, as outlined in the Torah and other sacred texts.
While the ancient Greeks and Romans had ethical systems and codes of conduct, they were not necessarily tied to religious beliefs or practices in the same way that Judaism emphasizes.
Additionally, Judaism has a strong emphasis on the importance of community and social justice, with traditions like the obligation to give to charity and the concept of Tikkun Olam (repairing the world).
To know more about Judaism here:
https://brainly.com/question/29543913
#SPJ4
which courts in the federal and state court systems have original jurisdiction
Both the federal and state court systems have courts with original jurisdiction. Original jurisdiction refers to the power of a court to hear a case for the first time.
In the federal court system, the U.S. District Courts have original jurisdiction over most cases involving federal laws, including civil and criminal cases. The U.S. Supreme Court also has original jurisdiction in certain cases, such as those involving disputes between states or between a state and the federal government.
In the state court system, trial courts typically have original jurisdiction over most cases involving state laws, including civil and criminal cases. These courts may be called district courts, superior courts, or circuit courts, depending on the state.
In summary, courts with original jurisdiction in the federal and state court systems include the U.S. District Courts and state trial courts.
Learn more about original jurisdiction brainly.com/question/342388
#SPJ11
what are the pros and cons of predictive policing
In order to spot probable criminal conduct, law enforcement agencies use predictive analytics based on mathematical models and other analytical approaches. This practice is known as "predictive policing."
What are Predictive policing disadvantages?Predictive policing can bias police personnel by spotlighting high- and low-risk neighborhoods, placing them on unnecessarily high alert or giving them a false sense of security. Predictive policing has an effect on neighborhood residents in addition to criminals and law enforcement personnel.
What are Predictive policing advantages?By designating the locations of greater crime rates, this novel technique aids law enforcement in ensuring the safety of a community. Predictive policing has advantages in improving crime prevention, improving decision-making, and advancing justice.
To know more about Predictive Policing visit:
brainly.com/question/24655820
#SPJ1
One of the biggest challenges to airline frequent flier mile programs is the backlog of unredeemed miles. True or False
Yes, it may be stated as appropriate to mention that maintaining the backlog of unredeemed miles is among the biggest challenges for the airline's frequent flier miles programs. Therefore, the statement given is true.
The challenges of an organization are always related to the regular courses of business operations that they are engaged in. The problems arise because of the inefficiency of the management systems, as well as the factors that are not under control of the organizations for the time being.
Learn more about challenges here:
https://brainly.com/question/6981358
#SPJ4
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services recommends
O mental health therapy for all teens and young adults
O moderate aerobic activity for several hours a week
O assistance with disease tracking in the local area
O aggregation of data on local environmental pollution
Answer: Moderate aerobic activity for several hours a week.
Explanation: The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services recommends physical activity which is a moderately intense workout for adults every week along with a couple of days for muscle strengthening. A total of 150 minutes each week is recommended.
Answer: B
Explanation:
I just took it
Based in the country of Mexico(Healthcare system)
What is the health care budget picture? What are the largest budgetary issues affecting your state? How have these issues affected state programs? What kinds of public policies might be designed to give individuals more incentives to remain healthy and reduce demand for costly health care services? Mexico has universal healthcare that I (assume) is paid for by taxation. With the burden on continued funding of health care, have services been negatively impacted?
Based on USA Healthcare
Health care as a whole in this country is a mess. Many people who need health care cannot afford it, even with the "Affordable Care Act," which is anything but affordable. Medicaid is a peculiar program, as unlike Medicare, which is a national health care plan for seniors, Medicaid is managed by individual states. Even though federal dollars are used to fund a majority of Medicaid costs, the program is dependent on states to decide what coverage to offer and pay 10% of program costs. How can we address or provide a solution to a real Affordable Care Act? California commercially produced tobacco. How much is given in incentives for growing tobacco each year?
Answer:
The health care budget picture in Mexico is shaped by the government's commitment to providing universal health care to its citizens. The largest budgetary issue affecting the healthcare system is the cost of providing care, which is primarily funded through taxation. Despite this funding, the system has struggled with limited resources and some services have been negatively impacted.
To address these challenges, the government has implemented various public policies aimed at reducing demand for health care services, such as preventative measures, health promotion and disease prevention programs, and providing incentives for individuals to maintain good health.
In the United States, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) was intended to provide health insurance coverage to more Americans and reduce the cost of health care. However, despite its name, many people have found the cost of health insurance under the ACA to be unaffordable. The Medicaid program, which provides health care coverage to low-income individuals and families, is managed by individual states, making it susceptible to state budget cuts and the decisions of state officials.
To address the affordability of health care in the United States, some suggest expanding access to health insurance, increasing funding for Medicaid, or implementing a single-payer system like Medicare. The government also provides incentives for growing tobacco in California, though the amount given each year is not specified.
Explanation:
amendments to the constitution must be ratified by what fraction of congress___
Amendments to the constitution must be ratified by at least two-third vote of both the houses.
Amendment is a addition or alteration made to a law, constitution, statute through legislative bills and resolutions passed in both the houses of the senate. The government frames the laws and reforms which has to be brought in the houses which has to be passed with not less than two-third majority to be enacted otherwise the law becomes null and void and is disposed off. The first ever bill of rights was ratified by the congress in 1791. Till date the congress ratified 27 amendments in total.
To know more about "Amendments" visit-
brainly.com/question/13276616
#SPJ4
During the defendant's cross-country road trip, he was involved in a car accident with the plaintiff in the state where the plaintiff lived. Following the accident, the plaintiff sued the defendant in federal court located in the state where the accident occurred. Prior to the accident, the defendant had never been to the forum state. The defendant flew home from the forum state directly following the accident, and has not been back to the forum state since that time. Before filing a responsive pleading, the defendant filed a motion to dismiss, arguing that the court lacked personal jurisdiction. The court denied the defendant's motion.What is the most likely basis for the exercise of jurisdiction over the defendant in this case?
A
General jurisdiction.
B
In rem jurisdiction.
C
Quasi in rem jurisdiction.
D
Specific jurisdiction.
The correct option is Option D - Specific jurisdiction.
Based on the facts presented, the most likely basis for the exercise of jurisdiction over the defendant in this case is specific jurisdiction.
Specific jurisdiction is a legal remedy in contract law in which a court requires a party to satisfy the terms of a contract rather than paying monetary damages for a breach of contract. This remedy is generally available in circumstances when monetary damages would be insufficient to recompense the injured party, frequently because the contract's subject matter is unique or has exceptional value.
The defendant was involved in a car accident with the plaintiff in the plaintiff's home state, giving rise to the cause of action. Despite the fact that the defendant had never visited the forum state, the act of driving in the state and being involved in an accident there constitutes a sufficient relationship with the forum state to enable the exercise of particular jurisdiction over the defendant.
For such more question on jurisdiction:
https://brainly.com/question/26659100
#SPJ4
What are the steps in employee selection process?
Explanation:
announcing the job, reviewing applications, screening candidates, interviewing, final selection, testing, and making an offer.
____temporarily settled the national debate over whether new states would permit or prohibit slavery
The Missouri Compromise of 1820 temporarily settled the national debate over whether new states would permit or prohibit slavery.
The legislation of Missouri Compromise of 1820 admitted Missouri as a slave state and Maine as a non-slave state at the same time and the 36'30” line was drawn to establish division regarding slavery for the remainder of the Louisiana Territory., so as not to upset the balance between slave and free states in the nation. It was step to outlaw slavery in a very large region. It is an effort to preserve the balance of power in Congress between slave and free states. But it failed to resolve the problem of slavery and its impact on future.
To know more about "Missouri Compromise" visit-
brainly.com/question/18367808
#SPJ4
If you were one of the legislators during the debate over the Bill, would you support or oppose the Bill? Why or why not?
If I was one of the legislators during a debate over the bill I would certainly support a bill after addressing all its advantages only.
Like all the legislators debate on the bills present in the houses and considering the facts, advantages and disadvantages decide whether to support a bill or not, I will adopt the same procedure. A bill is a proposed legislation proposed by a legislature in front of a senate, which further debates and address such bills and then the process of voting is done where the members of the houses either accept or oppose the bills. The senate with at least one third of votes can ratify the bill. If both the House and Senate pass the same bill then it is sent to the President. If the House and Senate pass different bills they are sent to Conference Committee. Most major legislation goes to a Conference Committee. A bill when signed by the president becomes a law.
Know more about "bill" visit
brainly.com/question/1163954
#SPJ4
which laws did the us citizens follow ?
In the United States, citizens are expected to follow federal, state, and local laws.
What is the US Laws about?Federal laws are enacted by the U.S. Congress and apply to all citizens throughout the country. Some examples of federal laws include the Constitution, which is the supreme law of the land and establishes the framework of the federal government; the Civil Rights Act, which prohibits discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin; and the tax code, which governs how taxes are collected and distributed.
State laws, on the other hand, vary from state to state and cover a range of issues such as criminal law, family law, and business law. For example, each state has its own driving laws, which dictate how drivers must behave on the road, and each state has its own criminal code, which defines crimes and punishments.
Local laws, such as city or county ordinances, are enacted by local governments and govern issues specific to a particular community, such as land use, traffic, and noise regulations.
Conclusively, It's important to note that when there is a conflict between federal, state, and local laws, federal law takes precedence.
Learn more about US Laws from
https://brainly.com/question/1122276
#SPJ1
what caused texas's rate of incarceration to decline between 2013 and 2014?
The decline in Texas's rate of incarceration between 2013 and 2014 was caused by a combination of factors, including the implementation of alternative sentencing options for nonviolent offenders, the expansion of probation and parole programs, and a focus on rehabilitation and reentry support for incarcerated individuals.
Additionally, there was a decrease in crime rates during this time period, leading to fewer individuals being sentenced to prison. Overall, these efforts were aimed at reducing the state's reliance on incarceration as a form of punishment and addressing the underlying causes of criminal behavior.
Texas has historically had one of the highest rates of incarceration in the United States, although in recent years its incarceration rate has decreased somewhat. According to the World Prison Brief, as of 2021, Texas has an incarceration rate of 587 per 100,000 people, which is higher than the national average of 352 per 100,000 people.
You can read more about incarceration at https://brainly.com/question/29383210
#SPJ11
Under what circumstances will a judge grant a motion for a new trial?
a. When the attorneys did not ask enough questions of witnesses.
b. When the jury clearly misapplied the law or misunderstood the evidence.
c. When the jury did not ask enough questions during the trial.
When the jury clearly misapplied the law or misunderstood the evidence than a judge grants a motion for a new trial.
What is the jury?
An impartial decision (a finding of fact on a subject that has been formally presented to them by a court) can be made by a jury, which is a group of persons (jurors) who have been sworn to secrecy. They may also decide to impose a fine or judgment.
In England, juries emerged throughout the Middle Ages and are a distinctive feature of the common law system. The United Kingdom, the United States, Canada, Ireland, Australia, and other nations whose legal systems were influenced by the British Empire, as a result, employ them. However, most other nations follow either European civil law or Islamic sharia law, both of which rarely employ juries.
To learn more about jury visit;
https://brainly.com/question/9788151
#SPJ4
