The law of demand states that "price decreases lead to greater demand and limited supply, which occur during excess demand" explains the relation between the law of "demand and excess demand".
What is demand in plain English?Demand is just a consumer's desire to buy products and services immediately and to pay the price associated with them. Demand can be defined as the quantity of things that consumers are prepared and willing to purchase at various prices within a specific time frame.
How do you teach a young child about demand?The supply of something is its quantity. Demand is the level of desire. Prices decrease when supply exceeds demand. Prices increase when demand exceeds supply.
To know more about Demand visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29703449
#SPJ1
Answer:
The law states that decreases in price leads to greater quantity demanded and limited supply, which occurs during excess demand.
Explanation:
The answer above is correct.
may a legislative body enact laws to raise revenues in the absence of a constitutional provision granting said body the power to tax?
No, a legislative body cannot enact laws to raise revenue in the absence of a constitutional provision granting the power to tax.
The power to tax is an inherent power of the state and is limited by the Constitution. Unless a legislative body has the constitutional authority to tax, it cannot enact laws to raise revenue. The Constitution defines the scope and limits of government power, and any law that exceeds these limits is considered unconstitutional. If a legislative body does not have the constitutional power to tax, it cannot legally make laws that impose taxes or raise revenue. This is because the Constitution sets the limits on government power and any law that exceeds these limits is considered unconstitutional.
Learn more about legislative here:
https://brainly.com/question/29804648
#SPJ4
38) Which of the following would be considered an example of "shaping moral standards," as
seen as a function of the law?
A) laws granting freedom of speech and religion
B) laws discouraging drug and alcohol abuse
C) laws providing rights to peaceful protest
D) laws preventing overthrow of the government
Answer:
B) laws discouraging drug and alcohol abuse would be considered an example of "shaping moral standards," as seen as a function of the law.
Regency Tranportation, Inc. , operate a freight buine throughout the eatern United State. Regency maintain it corporate headquarter, four warehoue, and a maintenance facility and terminal location for repairing and toring vehicle in Maachuett. All of the vehicle in Regency’ fleet were bought in other tate. Maachuett impoe a ue tax on all taxpayer ubject to it juridiction, including thoe that do buine in intertate commerce, a Regency doe. When Maachuett impoed the tax on the purchae price of each tractor and trailer in Regency’ fleet, the trucking firm challenged the aement a dicriminatory under the commerce claue. What i the chief conideration under the commerce claue when a tate law affect intertate commerce? I Maachuett’ ue tax valid? Explain
Answer:
Companies use tax breaks, from the state they are in, and if another state offers a less expensive tax for tags and license, they register their vehicles , where ever is the least cost.
What is the analysis regarding the Austin v. Paramount Parks 195 F.3d 715 (4th Cir. 1999)?
The district court clearly instructed the jury as "Chance Hester was a government leader of petitioner Paramount Parks, Inc." in its judgment on the 1983 claim, which included this finding.
What is Austin v. Paramount Parks?The jury found Austin not guilty of Austin's state-law claim of malicious prosecution. The ruling mandates that the newly established firms be free of any prior managerial ties to one another or the plaintiff and that they have no common managers.
After Austin's testimony, Paramount filed a motion for justice and the rule of law regarding each of the six charges in accordance with Rule 50(a) of both the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.
The motion made by Paramount after the conclusion of all the evidence was also rejected by the district court. In addition, the district court declared that Hester qualified as a "policymaker" for Paramount for such reasons of 1983 liability.
Learn more about Austin v. Paramount Parks, Here:
brainly.com/question/28168634
#SPJ1
Taylor is called for jury duty. However, the defendant's attorney decides to have him removed from the jury pool because he wants the jury to be comprised of predominantly African Americans. In this case:
Option A: the defense attorney use of peremptory challenge to exclude Taylor from the jury could be successfully contested and disallowed because it is unconstitutional, is the right choice in this case.
The prosecution and defense have the chance to oust prospective jurors they don't want from the jury during jury selection in a criminal trial. Both the prosecution and the defense may raise an unlimited number of "cause" objections to disqualify potential jurors from the case. As a result, Option A turns out to be the best option.
As a citizen of the United States, it is your responsibility to participate in a court case as a jury. By participating in a jury, you uphold the defendant's Sixth Amendment right to a prompt and fair trial. 1 If you are selected for jury duty, you have to show up in court or you could be found in contempt of court.
To know more about jury selection, refer to the following link:
https://brainly.com/question/23497087
#SPJ4
Complete question is:
Taylor is called for jury duty. However, the defendant's attorney decides to have him removed from the jury pool because he wants the jury to be comprised of predominantly African Americans. In this case:
a. the defense attorney's use of the peremptory challenge to exclude Taylor from the jury could be successfully contested and disallowed because it is unconstitutional.
b. a judge may not invade the privacy of an attorney's theory of a case as manifested in peremptory challenges.
c. the attorney will succeed in keeping Taylor off the jury because his defendant is an African American. The attorney may use his unlimited number of challenges for cause because of the potential for racial discrimination on the part of Taylor.
d. the defendant's attorney will succeed in keeping Taylor off the jury because he has a limited number of peremptory challenges for which no cause is required to disqualify a juror
the defense attorney use of peremptory challenge to exclude Taylor from the jury could be successfully contested and disallowed because it is unconstitutional
what is the aim of ohm's law experiment
The aim of ohm's law experi-ment is to reduce a complicated resist-ance circuit to a simple one-resistor equivalent circuit.
Ohm’s law sta-tes that the voltage across a con-ductor is directly proport-ional to the current flow-ing through it , provided all physical conditions and temper-atures re-main constant. Math-ematically, this current voltage relation-ship is written as, V=IR. In the equ-ation, the constant of proportion-ality, R, is call-ed Resistance and has units of ohms, with the sym-bol Ω.
Ohm’s law only holds true if the provid-ed temperature and the other physical fact-ors remain constant. In certain com-ponents, incre-asing the cur-rent raises the temp-erature.
To know more about ohm's law click below:
brainly.com/question/1247379
#SPJ4
why were the granger laws unconstitutional who needed protection from railroads
In the so-called "Wabash Case," the Supreme Court determined that the Illinois Granger legislation as it applied to railroads was unconstitutional because it attempted to regulate interstate trade, a function that the Tenth Amendment reserves to the federal government.
Because Illinois' granger statutes attempted to regulate interstate commerce, which Gibbons v. Ogden had established as the federal government's purview, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 1886 that they were unconstitutional (1824).
First, they claimed that railroads sold government land grants to businesses rather than selling them to families. Furthermore, they claimed that the railroad industry's exorbitant freight prices put farmers in debt. To protest these injustices, the Grangers got involved in politics.
To know more about government, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/16940043
#SPJ4
the defendant was the primary suspect in a string of robberies. at the request of the police, the defendant appeared in a line-up at the police station, and one
The defendant was entitled to Sixth Amendment right to counsel at the arraignment.
The defendant was entitled to the Sixth Amendment right to counsel at the arraignment. This amendment guarantees a person accused of a crime the right to have an attorney present during their arraignment. This is an important right, as it ensures that the defendant is not alone in the courtroom and is able to receive legal advice from an experienced attorney.
This is an important step in the criminal justice process, as it allows the defendant to understand the charges against them and to make informed decisions about their legal options.
--------The given question is incomplete, the complete question is:
"The defendant was the primary suspect in a string of robberies. At the request of the police, the defendant appeared in a line-up at the police station, and one of the victims identified him as the person who robbed him. The police then took the defendant into custody and interrogated him, after which the defendant was released without being charged. The following day, the defendant was arrested and appeared at an arraignment, where he entered a plea of not guilty. After the arraignment, the defendant was appointed an attorney. The defendant had not been represented by an attorney at any point before that time, nor had he requested an attorney. The defendant intends to argue that he was denied his Sixth Amendment right to counsel. At what point did the defendant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel first attach?"--------
To know more about defendant, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/14167307
#SPJ4
The judicial branch of the federal government does not control the executive branch because federal judges are appointed for life.
Answer:
This is not entirely accurate. The judicial branch of the federal government is separate and independent from the executive branch, but it does have the power to review and interpret laws passed by Congress and enforceable by the executive branch. Additionally, federal judges are appointed by the President, with the advice and consent of the Senate, and hold their positions for life, so as to maintain their independence from the political branches of government. The judicial branch also has the power to declare unconstitutional acts of the executive and legislative branches. The judicial branch, therefore, does have some control over the other two branches, but it is limited and defined by the Constitution.
meg, an attorney, has a case that was recently heard by the united states court of appeals. she would like to have the united states supreme court hear the case. one way by which the u.s. supreme court may review the case is by:
Where Meg, an attorney, has a case that the united states court of appeals recently heard. she would like to have the united states supreme court hear the case. one way by which the u.s. supreme court may review the case is by: "writ of certiorari" (Option B)
What is a writ of certiorari?Certiorari is a legal process that seeks judicial review of a decision made by a subordinate court or government body.
Certiorari is derived from the name of an English prerogative writ issued by a higher court to direct that the lower court's record be submitted to the superior court for review.
Learn more about writ of certiorari:
https://brainly.com/question/11741023
#SPJ1
Full Question:
Meg, an attorney, has a case that was recently heard by the united states court of appeals. she would like to have the united states supreme court hear the case. one way by which the u.s. supreme court may review the case is by:
a. en banc appeal.
b. writ of certiorari.
c. long-arm statute.
d. forum non conveniens.
which of the following was established to ensure that nation-states adhered to the rules laid down in trade treaties? group of answer choices world trade organization united nations international monetary fund world bank group of twenty
The organization which was established to ensure that nations adhered to the rules laid down in trade treaties is World Trade Organization. It was aimed to make progressive changes in trade.
World trade organization was established in 1st January 1995 in Geneva. There are about 164 members in WTO. The main objectives of WTO are
To improve living standards in member-nations, create jobs and improve lives.They take part in negotiating trade rules and promoting international trade progressively.They oversees to the rules set by themselves. They ensure all the member nations adhere to these rules.Helps in maintaining open trade and promotes a global market.Settle disputes over trade between member-nations.So World Trade Organization is established to ensure whether the nations abide to the trade rules.
For more details regarding World Trade Organizations, kindly refer
https://brainly.com/question/27655848
#SPJ4
in an experiment conducted to demonstrate boyle's law, what would you have to plot to generate a straight line thus proving boyle's law?
In an experiment conducted to demonstrate Boyle's law, to generate a straight line use a graph of V against 1p is a straight line through the origin.
To illustrate Boyle's law, an experiment was conducted that resulted in a graph of volume (V) plotted against inverse pressure (1/p). This experiment showed that a straight line can be drawn through the origin, thus proving Boyle's law.
This states that for a fixed mass and constant temperature, the volume of a gas is inversely proportional to the pressure. In other words, the higher the pressure, the lower the volume and vice versa. The experiment conducted provided evidence to support this law and to demonstrate it's validity.
To know more about experiment, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/11256472
#SPJ4
would fiscal policy be weakened, or even rendered useless, by such a law?
Fiscal policy refers to government actions used to improve the economy, specifically through changing the amounts and allocations of governmental spending and taxes.
A government is indeed the system or collection of individuals in charge of an organized society, most commonly a state. In the broadest sense, government is made up of the legislative, the executive, and the judiciary. Government is both a tool of enforcing organizational policies and a system for defining policy. Many governments have a form of constitution, a declaration of their governing ideas and philosophy. While governance exists in many sorts of organizations, the term government is frequently used to refer to the 200 autonomous national governments including subsidiary organizations. In the contemporary age, the primary forms of political systems include democracies, monarchies, authoritarian & totalitarian regimes. Monarchy, aristocracy, timocracy, oligarch, democracy, and theocracy have all been historically dominant systems of governance.
Learn more about systems here
https://brainly.com/question/30328846
#SPJ4
In order to complete the INCOME section on the 1040 you need what form from your employer?
Answer:
In order to complete the INCOME section on the 1040 form, you will need a W-2 form from your employer. This form will provide the information you need to report your wages, salaries, tips, and other compensation from your job. It will also provide the information you need to calculate your taxes.
would it be legal for you to give a quitclaim deed for the statue of liberty to your friend?
No, it would not be lawful for me to offer my buddy a quitclaim deed to the Statue of Liberty. The United States government owns the Statue of Liberty, which is a national monument.
It does not belong to anybody and cannot be transferred or sold. Any effort to transfer ownership of the Statue of Liberty by a quitclaim deed or other means would be unlawful and would have no legal impact. No, it would not be lawful for me to offer my buddy a quitclaim deed to the Statue of Liberty. The United States government owns the Statue of Liberty, which is a national monument. it would not be lawful for me to offer my buddy a quitclaim deed to the Statue of Liberty. It does not belong to anybody and cannot be transferred or sold. Any effort to transfer ownership of the Statue of Liberty by a quitclaim deed or other means would be unlawful and would have no legal impact.
learn more about government here:
https://brainly.com/question/16940043
#SPJ4
What is the conclusion regarding the Austin v. Paramount Parks 195 F.3d 715 (4th Cir. 1999)?
We reach the conclusion that Paramount was authorized to rule as a matter of law dismissing Austin's 1983 claim. Austin was unable to show that any violation of her respecting rights was brought on by Paramount's formal practices.
What is Austin v. Paramount Parks?In the end, the jury found Austin not guilty of Austin's state-law claim of malicious prosecution. The ruling mandates that the newly established firms be free of any prior managerial ties to one another or the plaintiff and that they have no common managers.
We further surmise that Paramount was empowered to a ruling as a matter of law on Austin's arguments for false imprisonment and false arrest because Gatewood was acting in the course of her government duty to uphold Virginia law even before she carried out Austin's detainment on that date and helped with the court proceedings.
Learn more about Austin v. Paramount Parks, Here:
brainly.com/question/28168634
#SPJ1
is a form of subjective decision making that begins when a victim or witness decides whether or not to report a crime to the police.
The main purpose of the contract was for construction services. An "estimated" or witness decides is stated in the contract. Project and construction-related terms were utilized in the contract.
It is a method that entails extrapolating specific instances of the relevant law from a small sample of cases to a larger group of situations. The historical, empirical, or a posteriori methods are other names for it.
It is also possible to say that it is a real-world approach to legal issues in work, study, and research. According to Dworkin, the purpose of all legal interpretation is to "constructively interpret" or "create the finest possible example of the form or genre to which it is taken to belong" the social practice of law.
Learn more about decision making Visit: brainly.com/question/1249089
#SPJ4
Correct Question:
_____ is a form of subjective decision making that begins when a victim or witness decides whether or not to report a crime to the police.
why was the educators' code of ethics revised in 2002?
One goal of the Ethics Committee Task Force searches to humble the potential of the code of ethics expected used to needlessly chastise psychologists. In addition, the revised Ethics Code means better sympathy for the needs of educational and semantic youths and juniors.
The code of ethics for supervisors is designed to safeguard the rights of the scholars, all the scholars. It is main that educators appreciate that when they take an education position they are consenting to attend the code of morality.
A code of ethics in trade is a set of leading standards destined to guarantee a trade and allure employees grant truthfulness and completeness entirely surfaces of allure ordinary movements and to only undertake acts that advance a benefit to society.
To know more about code of ethics refer to: https://brainly.com/question/13663435
#SPJ4
U.S. Constitution
How relevant is the U.S. Constitution today? Are our basic rights as citizens firmly protected or are we seeing some erosion of those rights?
Consider laws regulating the right to bear arms, freedom of the press, freedom of religion, etc.
The U.S. Constitution is still highly relevant today and continues to serve as the foundation of American law and government. The basic rights of citizens, such as the right to bear arms, freedom of the press, and freedom of religion, are enshrined in the Constitution and are protected by the courts. However, there is ongoing debate and discussion about the interpretation and application of these rights in contemporary society. Some argue that there is erosion of these rights, while others argue that they are still firmly protected. Ultimately, the ongoing relevance and protection of these rights will depend on the actions and decisions of government officials, lawmakers, and the courts.
As the Founders debated whether to have a more centralized or diffuse national government, Federalist No. 2 argued for a union among the states under _____________________________.
Federalist No. 2 argued for a union among the states under a strong centralized national government.
Hamilton, Jay, and Madison contended in the Federalist Papers that the Articles of Confederation's devolution of authority prohibited the new nation from growing powerful enough to compete on the international stage or to repress domestic insurgencies like Shays' Rebellion.
On October 31, 1787, Jay wrote Federalist No. 2, titled "Concerning Dangers From Foreign Force and Influence," as the first of five articles in which he discusses the merits of a unified government versus separate sovereignties.
The Federalists advocated for a consolidated national government with strong budgetary underpinnings. Furthermore, the Federalists believed that the Constitution was subject to interpretation.
For more questions on Federalist No. 2
https://brainly.com/question/28228998
#SPJ4
explain the legislative framework that needs to take into consideration when deciding whether or not to go ahead with an innovative idea/ proposal.
When deciding whether to go ahead with an innovative idea or proposal, it's important to consider the legislative framework in place, as this can have a significant impact on the viability of the project.
Relevant laws and legislative: Make sure the proposal is in compliance with relevant laws and regulations, such as environmental, health and safety, and data protection laws. Intellectual property rights: Consider if the proposal infringes any existing patents, trademarks or copyrights. Contract law: Make sure that any contracts or agreements related to the proposal are legally binding and enforceable. Competition law: Ensure that the proposal does not violate any anti-competition or anti-trust laws. Tax laws: Determine the tax implications of the proposal, including any tax incentives or disincentives. Liability laws: Consider the potential liabilities and responsibilities associated with the proposal.
Learn more about legislative here:
https://brainly.com/question/29804648
#SPJ4
In the development of commercial speech law, which statement best describes how Sorrell affected the application of the Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service Commission test?
Sorrell modified the Central Hudson test, strengthening the constitutional protection for truthful advertising for legal products, is the statement that best describes how Sorrel affected the application of the Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v Public Service Commission Test in the development of the commercial speech law. Therefore, the option B holds true.
The commercial speech law maintains to explain that the speech given by an individual is regulated as per the protection provided under the First Amendment of the US Constitution. As per this law, no one can be sued or held guilty for making a commercial speech or advertisement for a legal product.
Learn more about the commercial speech law here:
https://brainly.com/question/28235899
#SPJ4
Complete question
In the development of commercial speech law, which statement best describes how Sorrell affected the application of the Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service Commission test?
A. Sorrell made Central Hudson Test illegal, providing no constitutional protection for advertising for legal products
B. Sorrell modified the Central Hudson test, strengthening the constitutional protection for truthful advertising for legal products
C. Both A and B
which describes the necessity for a hospital to follow its own medical staff policy bylaws?
Medical staff policy bylaws serve as a fundamental guide for a hospital to ensure the provision of safe, high-quality medical care. The necessity for a hospital to follow its own medical staff policy bylaws is essential to maintain the hospital's integrity and reputation.
These bylaws outline the responsibilities, privileges, and qualifications of the hospital's medical staff and provide a framework for ensuring the provision of safe and efficient medical care to patients.
Adherence to the medical staff policy bylaws helps to maintain the hospital's accreditation, licensing, and regulatory compliance. The bylaws also help to ensure that the hospital's medical staff is competent, qualified, and capable of providing medical care that meets the standards of the medical profession.
To know more about medical staff policy refers to-
brainly.com/question/5817113#
#SPJ11
What regulation covers the army materials maintenance policy?
The Army materials maintenance policy is covered by the Army Regulation 700-142 (AR 700-142).
AR 700-142 is a comprehensive regulation that outlines the policies and procedures for the maintenance, repair, and overhaul of Army equipment and supplies. It covers a wide range of topics, including the management of maintenance activities, the use of contractors for maintenance services, and the reporting and tracking of maintenance activities.
One of the key objectives of AR 700-142 is to ensure the readiness of Army equipment and supplies, by ensuring that all maintenance activities are performed in a timely and effective manner. The regulation provides guidance on how to prioritize maintenance activities, how to allocate resources for maintenance, and how to monitor the performance of maintenance activities.
The regulation also covers the use of contractors for maintenance services, outlining the criteria for selecting contractors and the responsibilities of both the Army and the contractors. This helps to ensure that the Army gets the best value for its maintenance dollars and that contractors are held accountable for the quality of their work.
Another important aspect of AR 700-142 is the reporting and tracking of maintenance activities. The regulation requires that the Army maintain records of all maintenance activities, including the status of equipment, the cost of maintenance, and the results of maintenance inspections. This information is used to improve the Army's maintenance processes and to ensure that equipment is ready when it is needed.
To know more about army regulation refer to-
brainly.com/question/29829670#
#SPJ11
73) a scheme where the down payment is actually borrowed or carried as a second mortgage by the seller but never documented in the purchase agreement, escrow instructions, or recorded is known as:
A scheme where the down payment is actually borrowed or carried as a second mortgage by the seller but never documented in the purchase agreement, is known as "silent second mortgage" or "straw loan."
The scheme you are referring to is commonly known as a "silent second mortgage" or "straw loan." This type of arrangement is often used to help a buyer who may not have enough money for a down payment, but it can be illegal and unethical.
In a silent second mortgage, the seller provides the buyer with the funds for a down payment, but the loan is not documented in the official purchase agreement, escrow instructions, or recorded with the local government. This means that the loan is not legally binding, and the buyer may not have to repay it.
To know more about second mortage click here:
https://brainly.com/question/29849124#
#SPJ11
Three factors that courts use to determine whether an offeree accepted a contractual offer are if the offeree: _______, _______, and _______. (Choose three correct answers)
Courts look at three things to decide whether a party accepted a contractual offer:
if the offeree conveyed their acceptance to the offeror; whether they agreed to the offeror's terms; and whether they intended to sign a contract.A contract must contain several characteristics in order to be legitimate and recognized by the common law, including an offer, acceptance, consideration, the desire to establish legal relations, authority and ability, and certainty.
A contract cannot be enforceable by the courts and is not legally binding if it lacks these components. There are two different kinds of offers: general and specific. While a specific offer is given to one person alone, a generic offer is extended to a group of people.
Learn more about contractual Visit: brainly.com/question/27899951
#SPJ4
Correct Question:
Three factors that courts use to determine whether an offeree accepted a contractual offer are if the offeree: _______, _______, and _______.
what two descisions does duncan make after hearing of the defeat of the enemy. quote one line to support your answer
Duncan sentences Macdonwald, the Thane of Cawdor, to death and then pronounces Macbeth's name. "What he hath lost, noble Macbeth hath won"
Duncan invites Macbeth to the event where he informs Malcom that he is the next in line for the throne as a prize for his valour in suppressing the rebels. This was uttered in front of Macbeth, which infuriated him because the witches had already informed him that he would succeed Macbeth as king.
King Duncan in Scotland hears about Macbeth's bravery in taking on the Norwegians at the start of the play. "He unseamed a man from knave to chops," group 1 Cawdor receives the title of Thane from Duncan as a reward for his valour. Due to his treachery, the elderly Thane of Cawdor received a death sentence.
To know more about treachery, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/17237419
#SPJ4
Which direction are the courts moving regarding the rights of the accused?
a. away from individual protections and toward enhanced government powers
b. toward more individual protections and less government powers
c. more power is given to grand juries to determine guilt or innocence
d. more power is given to local judges and less to federal judges
The direction of the courts has been towards more individual protections and less government powers. So, The correct answer is Option B.
This means that the courts are placing a greater emphasis on ensuring that the rights of the accused are protected, and that the government does not have too much power to restrict these rights.
One example of this trend is the Supreme Court's decision in the landmark case of Miranda v. Arizona. This case established the Miranda warning, which informs suspects of their right to remain silent and to have an attorney present during questioning.
This warning is now required to be read to all suspects in police custody, and is an example of the courts moving towards more individual protections.
To read more about legal system, visit- https://brainly.com/question/1894269
#SPJ11
does monarchy exist in the middle east or africa
Yes, there are still some monarchies in the Middle East and Africa today. A monarchy is a form of government in which the power is held by a single person, usually a king or queen, who inherits the position by birth or tradition.
In the Middle East, there are several countries that still have monarchies, including Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, and Brunei. In these countries, the monarchy has a significant amount of political power and the king or queen has the final say in important matters of government.
In Africa, there are a few countries that also have monarchies, including Morocco and Swaziland. In these countries, the role of the monarchy can vary, with some having more ceremonial functions while others have more political power.
It is important to note that while there are still some monarchies in the Middle East and Africa, many countries in the region have adopted other forms of government, such as republics or dictatorships. The role and power of the monarchy can also vary greatly between countries and even within the same country over time.
To know more about monarchy refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/3458331#
#SPJ11
Those that experience the criminal act and its consequences firsthand are called:primary victims.
Those that experience the criminal act and its consequences firsthand are called primary victims.
A primary victim is an individual who is injured or dies as an explicit outcome of a violent crime committed against him or her; attempting to arrest somebody he/she supposes, on plausible grounds, has perpetrated a violent crime; attempting to deter the commission of a violent crime; or endeavoring to help or rescue someone he/she assumes is the victim of a violent crime.
A primary victim may be granted up to $60,000 in financial assistance, to encircle rational expenditures incurred in regaining from the crime practical counseling expenses; medical costs incurred as an immediate effect of the violent crime; plausible safety-related costs.
To learn more about the victims visit here:
https://brainly.com/question/4124780
#SPJ4
