Which mixes number is equivalent to the improper fraction 17/10

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

D. 625

Step-by-step explanation:

If the side length for each block is 2 1/2 then two blocks together make 5 so 4 blocks going up makes the height 10 and two blocks for the width make 5 and the 5 blocks on the bottom going across for length make 12 1/2 and 5*10*12 1/2= 625

Answer:

(1): -4.7 - 2.3x + 0.5 - 4x

(2):-5.3x-4.2-x

(3):-3.4-6.3x-0.8

Step-by-step explanation:

By Collecting like terms and adding the answer I get -6.3x - 4.2

(1):-4.7-2.3x+0.5-4x

Collect like terms

-2.3x-4x-4.7+0.5

-6.3x-4.2

(2):-5.3x-4.2-x

Collect like terms

-5.3x-x-4.2

-6.3x-4.2

(3): -3.4-6.3x-0.8

Collect like terms

-6.3x-3.4-0.8

-6.3x-4.2

Answer:

The first 3 are equivalent the last 3 aren't.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

m= 0/-2

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

48

Step-by-step explanation: 4x8=32 2x8=16 32+16=48 :)

Answer:

[tex]8.182X10^8 $pounds[/tex]

a=8.182 and b=8

Step-by-step explanation:

Weight of the Empire State Building =[tex]7.3X 10^8[/tex] pounds.

Weight of the One World Trade Center building= 88,200,000 pounds.

=[tex]8.82 X 10^7[/tex]

The addition of the two:

[tex]=7.3X 10^8+8.82 X 10^7\\$To make it easier to add, express both as powers of 8\\=7.3X 10^8+0.882 X 10^8\\=(7.3+0.882)X10^8\\=8.182X10^8 $ pounds[/tex]

Comparing with the form: [tex]aX10^b[/tex]

a=8.182 and b=8

Answer:

A dice of six faces has 5 numbers bigger than 1 (from 2 to 6).

Then, the number Peter is expecting is : 114 x (5/6) = 95 (times)

Hope this helps!

:)

Answer:

  y = -3

Step-by-step explanation:

The midline value is the added constant, -3. The equation for the line is ...

  y = -3

A.Equation

Step-by-step explanation:

A. Equation 30 plus 4

Answer:

D. Observational Study

Explanation:

An observational  study is one in which all the participants are subjected to a common treatment and then compared to people who did not receive the same treatment. This is the case with the students who where subjected to the same treatment; an additional rehearsal session. They are then observed by the professor and compared to those who did not participate in the experiment.  

This is also an example of a cohort observational study. A cohort observational study is one in which all the participants have a common uniting factor. They are made to undergo a treatment and then compared to those who did not receive the treatment. This type of study  is subject to bias because a positive or negative result might be because of other factors not related to the study.

The correct anwer is False

Explanation

According to the graph, it can be seen that a student has four hours of sleep as the minimum number of hours of sleep; two students have six hours of sleep, four students have six and a half hours of sleep, four have seven hours of sleep, three have seven and a half hours of sleep, five have eight hours of sleep, and one has eight and a half hours of sleep as maximum hours of sleep. Therefore, it can be affirmed that the statement that the difference between the maximum amount and the minimum number of hours is two and a half hours is false because between four hours and eight and a half hours there are four and a half hours of difference. So, the correct answer is False.

Answer:

58.79 mL of juice

Step-by-step explanation:

To do this, let's gather the data first:

In 1 cup of orange juice we have 500 mg of potassium. A patient weights 135 lb, and he needs to take care of it's potassium intake and not exceed 2 mg of K / kg per day.

So obviously he cannot drink a whole cup of orange juice. It has to be less. In order to know this, we need to know first the weight in kg. 1 lb equals 0.4536 kg so in 135 lb:

W = 135 lb * 0.4536 kg/lb = 61.24 kg

Now, we need to know with this weight, how much potassium it can takes:

Intake = 61.24 kg * 2 mg/kg = 122.48 mg of K

So, the maximum amount of potassium per day is 122.48 mg. This means that the quantity of orange juice this person can take is:

Juice = 122.48 mg * 240 mL / 500 mg

Juice = 58.79 mL of juice or simply 59 mL

Answer:

Regression equations can help you figure out if your data can be fit to an equation.This is extremely useful if you want to make predictions from your data- either future predictions or indications of past behavior.For example,you might want to know what your savings are going to be worth in the future.There are several types of regression equations,some of the more common include exponential and simoke linear regression.In elementary statistics,the regression equation you are most likely to come across is the linear form.

180º = π rad

So

(17π/18 rad) * (180/π º/rad) = (17π * 180)/(18 * π) º = 170º

Answer: [tex]3(3-4x+2y)[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]9-12x+6y[/tex]

[tex]3(3-4x+2y)[/tex]

Answer:

c

Step-by-step explanation:

You can either try each answer on the table above, or find the slope then find the function/equation.

c-y1=s(n-x1)

(x1,y1) being any pair from the table and s being the slope.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

1) The confidence interval is calculated as the following

[tex]CI = ( \bar x-1.96 \sigma ,\bar x=1.96 \sigmam)[/tex]

[tex]= (0.412-1.96 \times 0.094, 0.412 = 1.96 \times 0.094)\\\\= (0.22776, 0.59624)[/tex]

Hence, the confidence interval is [tex]0.22776 \leq \beta_G_P_A \leq 0.59624)[/tex]

11) Under two sid t-tailed test, the null hypothesis

[tex]H_0; \beta_{GPA}=0.4[/tex]

Against the alternative hypothesis

[tex]H_1 ; \beta _{GPA} \neq 0.4[/tex]

Under null hypothesis

[tex]t = \frac{\hat \beta _1 - \beta _1}{Se( \beta _1)} \\\\ =\frac{0.412-0.4}{0.094} \\\\=0.12766[/tex]

The degree of freedom is n - 1 = 140

From the t - table at 5% level of significance under two - tail is 1.96

Since , calculated value is lowe than the tabulated value, we do not reject the null hypothesis.

Answer:

Let's work out the intercepted points:

-4x + 8 = -3x^2 + 5x + 2

<=>

3x^2 - 9x + 6 = 0

<=>

x^2 - 3x + 2 = 0

<=>

(x - 1)(x - 2) = 0

<=>  

x = 1 => y = -4 x 1 + 8 = 4 => A(1, 4)

and

x = 2=> y = -4 x 2 + 8 = 0 =>B(2, 0)

Then, length of chord AB is calculated by:

L = sqrt [(2 - 1)^2 + (0 - 4)^2)] = ~4.123

Answer:

44 boxes

Step-by-step explanation:

778/18 = 43.222

round up cause you cant sell 2/10 of a box

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

m is the dependent variable; it represents the value of a linear function of k:

m = f(k) = k + 3

Answer: 8 gallons of water.

Step-by-step explanation:

3 x 4 x 5 = 60.

60 divided by the number of gallons per cubic foot 7.5 = 8 gallons. :)

Answer: 220

Step-by-step explanation:

When we wanto to create a group of K elements for a set of N elements (where the order of the K elements does not matter, so we do not considerate the permutations of the K elements), the number of possible combinations is:

[tex]C = \frac{N!}{(N - K)!*K!}[/tex]

Here N = 12 and K = 3

[tex]C = \frac{12!}{9!*3!} = \frac{12*11*10}{3*2} = 220[/tex]

So there are 220 possible combinations

Answer:

220

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

12.12%

Step-by-step explanation:

We have that the formula is given by:

A = p * e ^ (r * t)

From here, we know that A = 200000; p = 20000 and the time we can calculate 40 - 21 = 19

if we replace we have:

200000 = 20000 * e ^ (19 * r)

we must calculate r:

e ^ (19 * r) = 200000/20000

e ^ (19 * r) = 10

19 * r = ln 10

r = ln 10/19

r = 0.1212

In other words, the rate of growth is 12.12%

Answer:

12.1%

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

y=-2x-12

Step-by-step explanation:

Make the equation into slope intercept form

-2y=-4x-12

divide by -2

y=2x+6

since the line is parallel the slope is the same

y=2x+b

plug in (4,-4)

-4=8+b

b=-12

y=-2x-12

Answer:

 |Z| = |-52.5|  = 52.5 > 1.96 at 0.05 level of significance

 Null  hypothesis is rejected

We rejected the researcher's claim

A researcher do not claims that 96% of college graduates say their college degree has been  a good investment.

Step-by-step explanation:

Explanation:-

Given data A researcher claims that 96% of college graduates say their college degree has  been a good investment.

Population proportion 'P' = 0.96

                                       Q = 1-P = 1- 0.96 = 0.04

In a random sample of 2000 graduates, 1500 say their college degree has

been a good investment.

Sample proportion

                       [tex]p^{-} = \frac{x}{n} = \frac{1500}{2000} = 0.75[/tex]

Level of significance  ∝ = 0.05

[tex]Z_{\frac{\alpha }{2} } = Z_{\frac{0.05}{2} } = Z_{0.025} = 1.96[/tex]

Test statistic

                        [tex]Z = \frac{p^{-} - P }{\sqrt{\frac{PQ}{n} } }[/tex]

                        [tex]Z = \frac{0.75 - 0.96 }{\sqrt{\frac{0.96 X 0.04}{2000} } }[/tex]

                        [tex]Z = \frac{-0.21}{0.00435} = -52.5[/tex]

    |Z| = |-52.5|  = 52.5 > 1.96 at 0.05 level of significance

  Null  hypothesis is rejected

  We rejected the researcher's claim

Conclusion:-

A researcher do not claims that 96% of college graduates say their college degree has been  a good investment.

Answer:

We conclude that the true average estimated calorie content in the population sampled exceeds the actual content.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that an article reported on a pilot study in which each of 58 individuals in a sample was asked to estimate the calorie content of a 12 oz can of beer known to contain 153 calories.

The resulting sample mean estimated calorie level was 193 and the sample standard deviation was 88.

Let [tex]\mu[/tex] = true average estimated calorie content in the population sampled.

So, Null Hypothesis, [tex]H_0[/tex] : [tex]\mu[/tex] [tex]\leq[/tex] 153 calories     {means that the true average estimated calorie content in the population sampled does not exceeds the actual content}

Alternate Hypothesis, [tex]H_A[/tex] : [tex]\mu[/tex] > 153 calories     {means that the true average estimated calorie content in the population sampled exceeds the actual content}

The test statistics that would be used here One-sample t test statistics as we don't know about the population standard deviation;

                             T.S. =  [tex]\frac{\bar X-\mu}{\frac{s}{\sqrt{n} } }[/tex]  ~ [tex]t_n_-_1[/tex]

where, [tex]\bar X[/tex] = sample mean estimated calorie level = 193 calories

            s = sample standard deviation = 88

            n = sample of individuals = 58

So, the test statistics  =  [tex]\frac{193-153}{\frac{88}{\sqrt{58} } }[/tex]  ~ [tex]t_5_7[/tex]

                                       =  3.462

The value of t test statistics is 3.462.

Since, in the question we are not given the level of significance so we assume it to be 5%. Now, at 0.05 significance level the t table gives critical value of 1.6725 at 57 degree of freedom for right-tailed test.

Since our test statistic is more than the critical value of t as 3.462 > 1.6725, so we have sufficient evidence to reject our null hypothesis as it will fall in the rejection region due to which we reject our null hypothesis.

Therefore, we conclude that the true average estimated calorie content in the population sampled exceeds the actual content.

Answer:

C

Step-by-step explanation:

I’m rusty with my math, so I’m not 100% sure this is correct. My best attempt.

(1,-5) & (3,-17)

1=1x, -5=1y, 3=2x, -17=2y

Formula is y2-y1/x2-x1

-17 - -5 = -12

3 - 1 =2

So -12/2 = -6

Formula for the line is

y-y1 = m (x-x1)

In this equation m=-6

Y - -5 = -6 ( x - 1 )

Answer:C

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

7 9/10

Step-by-step explanation:

The mixed number will be 13 3/4.

Answer:

  $134.49

Step-by-step explanation:

Multiply the rate by the salary:

  7.65% × $1758 = $134.49

Tyler's employer should deduct $134.49.