The following is an example of nominal level of measurement: Number of people.
Nominal measurement level, also known as categorical data, entails the categorization of data into groups or classes. It's the simplest of the four measurement types because it only categorizes data and does not count or rank it.
Nominal data can only be classified into categories and cannot be measured in any other way. It is only possible to determine the frequency of each category when working with nominal data. Thus, we can conclude that the number of people is an example of nominal level of measurement.
To know more about nominal level visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30193657
#SPJ11
A constant 0.23 T magnetic field passes through a loop at an angle of 36.1" with respect to the normal of the area of the loop. If the radius of the loop is 19.4 mm, then find the flux through the loop. a. 0.0002197 Wb b. 0.0002116 Wb c. 0.0002441 Wb d. 0.0002275.Wb e. C 0.0002014.Wb f. 0.0002361 Wb
The flux through a loop is given by the product of the magnetic field strength, the area of the loop, and the cosine of the angle between the magnetic field and the normal to the loop. The correct answer is option b) 0.0002116 Wb.
Mathematically, the flux (Φ) can be calculated using the formula:
Φ = B * A * cos(θ)
where:
Φ is the flux,
B is the magnetic field strength,
A is the area of the loop,
θ is the angle between the magnetic field and the normal to the loop.
Given:
B = 0.23 T (magnetic field strength)
r = 19.4 mm = 0.0194 m (radius of the loop)
θ = 36.1° (angle between the magnetic field and the normal to the loop)
To find the area of the loop (A), we use the formula for the area of a circle:
A = π * r²
Substituting the given values:
A = π * (0.0194 m)²
A ≈ 0.001178 m²
Now, we can calculate the flux:
Φ = B * A * cos(θ)
Φ = 0.23 T * 0.001178 m² * cos(36.1°)
Φ ≈ 0.0002116 Wb
Therefore, the flux through the loop is approximately 0.0002116 Wb.
For more details regarding the magnetic field, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14848188
#SPJ4
A proton moves in the magnetic field B - 0.60î T with a speed of 1.0 x 107 m/s in the directions shown in the figure. (Figure 1)
In figure (a), what is the magnetic force on the proton? Give your answer in component form. Enter the x, y, and 2 components of the force separated by commas..
The magnetic force on the proton in component form is
Fx = 0,
Fy = 1.1312 × 10⁻¹⁵ N
Fz = 0
The magnetic force experienced by a charged particle moving in a magnetic field. It is given by:
F = q (v x B)
where:
F is the force experienced by the charged particle,
q is the charge of the particle,
v is the velocity vector of the particle,
x represents the cross product between v and B, and
B is the magnetic field vector.
Given: magnetic field, B = 0.60 T in x direction
speed of proton, v = 10⁷ m/s
speed of proton in x direction, Vx = v × cos45
Vx = 0.707 × 10⁷ m/s
speed of proton in the y direction, Vy = v × sin 45
Vy = 0.707 × 10⁷ m/s
speed of proton in the z-direction, Vz = 0
Magnetic force in x direction Fx = 0 as B and Vx are in the same direction
in the y direction, Fy = 1.6 × 10⁻¹⁹ × 0.707 × 10⁷ × 10⁷ N
Fy = 1.1312 × 10⁻¹⁵ N
In the z direction, Fz = 0
Therefore, Fx = 0,
Fy = 1.1312 × 10⁻¹⁵ N
Fz = 0
To know more about magnetic force, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/10353944
#SPJ4
Explain what science fiction futuristic writer Aurther C Clarke meany by each law. Do you agree or disagree with him and why.
1. Clarke's First Law: " "When a distinguished but elderly scientist states that something is possible, he is almost certainly right. When he states that something is impossible, he is very probably wrong."
2. Clarke's Second Law: ""The only way of discovering the limits of the possible is to venture a little way past them into the impossible."
3. Clarke's Third Law: "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."
4. Apple one or more of Clarke's Laws abd apply them to your situation today. Can these laws apply to your vision of your own future?
Clarke's First Law asserts that prominent senior scientists are likely right when they say something is conceivable and wrong when they say it is impossible.
This law emphasises the inaccuracy of scientific development boundaries. I support this law. New scientific discoveries and developments can make the unthinkable feasible. It reminds us to be open to ideas that challenge our present knowledge.
2. Clarke's Second Law indicates we must examine the seemingly impossible to discover what is possible. This law promotes knowledge expansion. I support this law. Creativity and thinking beyond the box lead to innovation and growth.
3. Clarke's Third Law asserts that advanced technology appears magical. It suggests that modern technology can appear so remarkable that it is hard to understand. This law is thought-provoking and I support it. As technology advances, we may find innovations or capabilities that seem magical because they exceed our comprehension or expectations.
4. Clarke's Laws apply to my current scenario. Clarke's First Law urges me to stay open to new ideas in my future. Clarke's Second Law inspires me to push my limits and explore new terrain. Clarke's Third Law shows that technology can make astonishing transformations. These laws help me shape my future with curiosity, investigation, and adaptation.
Learn more about . Clarke's Laws, here:
https://brainly.com/question/32547540
#SPJ4
Rhinoviruses typically cause common colds. In a test of effectiveness of echinacea , 40 of 45 subjects treated with echinacea developed rhinoviruses infections. In a placebo group, 88 o f the 103 subjects developed rhinoviruses infections. We are interested in whether Echinacea has an effect on rhinoviruses infections. Let {eq}p_1 {/eq} be the population proportion of infections that are taking echinacea , and {eq}p_2 {/eq} be the population proportion of infections that are not taking echinacea.
(a) Formulate the hypotheses.
(b) Calculate the value of the test statistic using a pooled sample proportion.
(c) Calculate the p - value using (b).
(d) Make a decision on the hypothesis using the p - value from (c) at a significance level of 0.10.
(a) The null hypothesis, H0: p1 - p2 = 0 implies that there is no difference in the proportion of infections that are taking echinacea, and the proportion of infections that are not taking echinacea.
While the alternative hypothesis, H1: p1 - p2 > 0 implies that the proportion of infections that are taking echinacea, and the proportion of infections that are not taking echinacea are different.
(b) The value of the test statistic using a pooled sample proportion.
We can use the formula below to calculate the test statistic (z-score)
.z = (p1 - p2) / SEp1-p2 = 0.218 - 0.854 = -0.636SEp1-p2 = sqrt [p * (1 - p) * {1/n1 + 1/n2}]p = (40 + 88) / (45 + 103) = 128 / 148 = 0.865SEp1-p2 = sqrt [0.865 * (1 - 0.865) * {1/45 + 1/103}] = 0.0894z = (-0.636) / 0.0894 = -7.13
(c) The p-value using (b).p-value = P(Z > z) = P(Z > -7.13) = 1.155e-12≈ 0.000(d) Decision on the hypothesis using the p-value from (c) at a significance level of 0.10.The p-value = 1.155e-12 ≈ 0.000 < α (0.10), we reject the null hypothesis H0 and conclude that there is enough evidence to support the claim that Echinacea has an effect on rhinoviruses infections.
In other words, Echinacea is effective in reducing the risk of rhinoviruses infections.
To know more about p-value visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30461126
#SPJ11
An open flame oil lamp is lit in an apartment having an air volume of 240 m³. The oil lamp emits Particulate Matter, (PM) at the rate of 80 ug/sec. The ventilation rate 100 L/sec. If the external ambient PM concentration is 120 µg/m³ and the initial concentration in the apartment is the same, and the decay rate constant for PM = 1.33*10^-4 1/s.
(a) Find the steady state concentration of PM in apartment, if the oil lamp remains lit
(b) The concentration of PM indoors after 0.5 hrs.
(a) The steady-state concentration of PM in the apartment when the oil lamp remains lit is negligible due to a high removal rate.
(b) The concentration of PM indoors after 0.5 hours is approximately 99.98 µg/m³, considering both decay and ventilation removal.
To calculate the steady-state concentration of PM in the apartment and the concentration of PM indoors after 0.5 hours, we can use the mass balance equation for PM.
(a) Steady-state concentration of PM in the apartment when the oil lamp remains lit:
The steady-state concentration occurs when the rate of emission of PM from the oil lamp equals the rate of removal through ventilation and decay.
Rate of emission = 80 µg/sec
Rate of removal through ventilation = Ventilation rate * Ambient concentration = 100 L/sec * 120 µg/m³ = 12,000 µg/sec
Rate of decay = Steady-state concentration * Decay rate constant
At steady state, the three rates are equal:
80 µg/sec = 12,000 µg/sec + Steady-state concentration * Decay rate constant
Rearranging the equation:
Steady-state concentration * Decay rate constant = 80 µg/sec - 12,000 µg/sec
Steady-state concentration = (80 µg/sec - 12,000 µg/sec) / Decay rate constant
Substituting the given values:
Decay rate constant = 1.33 * 10⁻⁴ 1/s
Steady-state concentration = (80 µg/sec - 12,000 µg/sec) / (1.33 * 10⁻⁴ 1/s)
= -11,920,000 µg/s / (1.33 * 10⁻⁴ 1/s)
≈ -8.94 * 10¹⁰ µg/m³ (negative value indicates that the concentration is negligible due to high removal rate)
Therefore, the steady-state concentration of PM in the apartment when the oil lamp remains lit is approximately negligible due to high removal rate.
(b) Concentration of PM indoors after 0.5 hours:
To calculate the concentration after 0.5 hours, we need to consider both the decay and ventilation removal.
Concentration after 0.5 hours = Initial concentration * e^(-decay rate constant * time) + Ventilation rate * ambient concentration * (1 - e^(-decay rate constant * time))
Initial concentration = Ambient concentration = 120 µg/m³
Decay rate constant = 1.33 * 10⁻⁴ 1/s
Time = 0.5 hours = 0.5 * 3600 seconds (converted to seconds)
Concentration after 0.5 hours = 120 µg/m³ * e^(-1.33 * 10⁻⁴ 1/s * 0.5 * 3600 s) + 100 L/sec * 120 µg/m³ * (1 - e^(-1.33 * 10⁻⁴ 1/s * 0.5 * 3600 s))
Calculating the expression:
Concentration after 0.5 hours ≈ 99.98 µg/m³
Therefore, the concentration of PM indoors after 0.5 hours is approximately 99.98 µg/m³.
To know more about steady-state concentration, refer to the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/31647854#
#SPJ11
a string with a
length if 1.20m has a mass of 4.00g. the velocity if wave
propagation along the string is 185m/s. the tension of the
stretched string is ?
114N
130N
102N
162N
145N
The correct answer is 130N. Here's how to get it:The speed of the wave propagation is given by the formula, v = √(T/μ)where T is tension in newtons and μ is mass per unit length in kg/m.
Since the mass of the string is given in grams, we first convert it to kg by dividing by 1000.
4.00g/1000 = 0.004kg
The length of the string is given in meters, so no conversion is needed.
l = 1.20m Now we can calculate μ = m/lμ = 0.004kg/1.20mμ = 0.00333 kg/m
Now we can use the formula to find T:T = μv²T = (0.00333 kg/m)(185 m/s)²T = (0.00333 kg/m)(34225 m²/s²)T = 114.09 N (rounded to 3 significant figures)
To know more about propagation visit:
https://brainly.com/question/13266121
#SPJ11
A spaceship at rest relative to a marty star in interplanetary space has a total mass of 2.60 x 10 kg. Ite engine freat steadily burning fuel at 72.4 kg/s with an exhaust speed of 4.50 x 10 m/s. Calculate the spaceship's acceleration at + = 0, mass att = 115 , acoperation at 115 s, and speed att - 1156, relative to the same narty star, HINT (a) acceleration to (Enter the magnitude. Enter your answer in m/s? (h) mass att = 115 s (Enter your answer in kg) acceleration at 115 s (Enter the magnitude. Enter your answer in m/s?) (d) speed att 1155 (or your answer in m.)
The spaceship's acceleration at t = 0 is 12530.76m/s. The mass of the spaceship at t = 115sec is 17674kg. The spaceship acceleration at t = 115 s is 13.346 x 10⁶. The speed of the spaceship remains the same s its initial speed.
(a) The momentum gained by the spaceship
Momentum(p) = (72.4 ) × (4.50 x 10⁶)
The equation for momentum to find the acceleration:
F = dp (rate of change of momentum) = ma
F = ma
Acceleration (a) at t = 0 is:
a = p / m
Where p is momentum gained and m is mass
a = [(72.4) × (4.50 x 10⁶)] / (2.60 x 10⁴)
a = 12530.76m/s
The spaceship's acceleration at t = 0 is 12530.76m/s
(b) Mass of expelled fuel = (72.4) × (115)
Mass at t = 115 s = (mass) - (mass of expelled fuel)
Mass at t = 115 s = (2.60 x 10⁴) - 8326 = 17674kg.
The mass of the spaceship at t = 115sec is 17674kg
(c) Acceleration at t = 115 s = [(mass of expelled fuel per second) * (exhaust velocity)] / (mass at t = 115 s)
Acceleration at t = 115 s = (72.4 × (4.50 x 10⁶))/17674.
Acceleration at t = 115 s = 13.346 x 10⁶
The space ship acceleration at t = 115 s is 13.346 x 10⁶
(d) To calculate the speed at t = 115 s
Velocity = (change in momentum) / (mass)
Since the momentum gained at t = 0 is equal to the momentum of the expelled fuel, the change in momentum at t = 115 s is zero. Therefore, the speed at t = 115 s is the same as the initial speed, which is zero.
To know more about speed and acceleration:
https://brainly.com/question/13675303
#SPJ4
correct question: A spaceship at rest relative to a nearby star in interplanetary space has a total mass of 2.60 x 10⁴ kg. Its engine fire at t=0 and steadily burning fuel at 72.4 kg/s with an exhaust speed of 4.50 x 10 m/s. Calculate the spaceship's acceleration at t = 0, mass t = 115s, and speed at t - 115 s, relative to the same nearby star, HINT (a) acceleration at t=0 (b) mass at t=115s (c) acceleration at = 115s (d) speed at t=115s.
FIND THE TOTAL CURRENT IN THE CIRCUIT ( THE VOLTAGE IS 5V )
3Ω 5 Ω 4 Ω 7 Ω 8 Ω 5v
A. 1.5 A
B. 0.4 A
C. 3.9 A
D. 0.6 A
The total current in the circuit will be approximately 4.763A. The given options are not correct.
To find the total current in the circuit, we need to apply Ohm's Law and use the principles of series and parallel resistors.
Let's analyze the circuit step by step;
Given;
Voltage (V) = 5V
Resistor values;
R₁ = 3Ω
R₂ = 5Ω
R₃ = 4Ω
R₄ = 7Ω
R₅ = 8Ω
To calculate the current flowing through the 5Ω resistor (VA), we can use Ohm's Law;
VA = V / R = 5V / 5Ω = 1A
To calculate the current flowing through the 1.5Ω resistor (VB), we need to determine the equivalent resistance of resistors R₁ and R₂, which are in series;
Rs1_2 = R₁ + R₂ = 3Ω + 5Ω = 8Ω
Now, we can calculate the current VB using Ohm's Law:
VB = V / Rs1_2 = 5V / 8Ω = 0.625A
To calculate the current flowing through the 0.4Ω resistor (VC), we need to determine the equivalent resistance of resistors R₃ and R₄, which are in parallel;
Rp3_4 = (R₃ × R₄) / (R₃ + R₄) = (4Ω × 7Ω) / (4Ω + 7Ω) = 1.75Ω
Now, we can calculate the current VC using Ohm's Law:
VC = V / Rp3_4 = 5V / 1.75Ω ≈ 2.857A
To calculate the current flowing through the 3.9Ω resistor (VD), we need to determine the equivalent resistance of resistors R5, VB, and VC, which are in series;
Rs5_VB_VC = R5 + Rs1_2 + Rp3_4 = 8Ω + 8Ω + 1.75Ω = 17.75Ω
Now, we can calculate the current VD using Ohm's Law:
VD = V / Rs5_VB_VC = 5V / 17.75Ω ≈ 0.281A
Therefore, the total current in the circuit is the sum of all the currents:
Total current = VA + VB + VC + VD
= 1A + 0.625A + 2.857A + 0.281A
≈ 4.763A
So, the total current in the circuit is approximately 4.763A.
Hence, the given options are not correct.
To know more about circuit here
https://brainly.com/question/21505732
#SPJ4
An argon laser has a green wavelength of 514 nm. Plank's constant is 6.63 x 10-34 J-s, and the speed of light is 3.00 x 108 m/s. What is the photon energy? a. 3.87 x 10-28 J
b. 03.87 x 10-19 J
c. 1.95 x 106 J d. 3.4-x 10-40 J
The photon energy is calculated to be 3.87 × 10⁻¹⁹ Joules. So the correct answer is option B.
A photon is a light particle that is basically a bundle of electromagnetic energy. The photon energy depends on its frequency.
The particle that Einstein thought of as a light particle is called a photon. At the heart of Einstein’s light quantum theory, the idea is that the energy of light is related to the frequency of its oscillation (frequency in radio waves). The frequency of light’s oscillation is the speed divided by the wavelength of light.
Given λ = 514 nm
Plank's constant (h)= 6.63 x 10-34 J-s
The speed of light (c) = 3 .00 x 10⁸ m/s
The formula to calculate the photon energy is
E = hc/ λ
E = 6.63 x 10⁻³⁴× 3 .00 x 10⁸/514
E = 3.87 × 10⁻¹⁹ J.
Thus the photon energy is 3.87 × 10⁻¹⁹ J.
To learn more about the photon energy, refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/28167863
#SPJ4
Use the great circle distance calculation to determine the distance between the following two locations. Use 6378 km as the radius of the Earth and round your answer to the nearest whole km. Your answer must be within 10km of the correct answer to receive credit.
Location A: 75° Lat -128° Lon
Location B: -56° Lat -77° Lon
The distance between Location A and Location B, rounded to the nearest whole km, is approximately 16951 km calculated using the Haversine formula.
The great circle distance is the shortest distance between two points on the surface of a sphere, such as the Earth. To calculate the great circle distance between Location A and Location B, we can use the Haversine formula.
First, we need to convert the latitude and longitude from degrees to radians. The formula for converting degrees to radians is: radians = degrees * π/180.
For Location A:
Latitude = 75° * π/180 ≈ 1.3089969389957472 radians
Longitude = -128° * π/180 ≈ -2.230717410285017 radians
For Location B:
Latitude = -56° * π/180 ≈ -0.9773843811168246 radians
Longitude = -77° * π/180 ≈ -1.343903524035633 radians
Next, we can use the Haversine formula to calculate the great circle distance. The Haversine formula is:
distance = 2 * radius * arcsin(√(sin²((latitude2 - latitude1)/2) + cos(latitude1) * cos(latitude2) * sin²((longitude2 - longitude1)/2)))
where radius is the radius of the Earth, which is given as 6378 km.
Substituting the values into the formula, we get:
distance = 2 * 6378 * arcsin(√(sin²((-0.9773843811168246 - 1.3089969389957472)/2) + cos(1.3089969389957472) * cos(-0.9773843811168246) * sin²((-1.343903524035633 - (-2.230717410285017))/2)))
After evaluating the formula, the calculated distance between Location A and Location B is approximately 16951 km.
Therefore, the distance between Location A and Location B, rounded to the nearest whole km, is approximately 16951 km.
Learn more about Haversine formula from this link:
brainly.com/question/29780043
#SPJ11
what question does the drake equation attempt to answer?
Astrophysics and SETI use the Drake Equation. It estimates the Milky Way's active, communicative extraterrestrial civilizations. The Drake Equation allows scientists to analyse the elements that affect the possibility of discovering intelligent alien species by estimating values for various variables.
Dr. Frank Drake's 1961 equation organises and quantifies aspects that increase the chance of intelligent alien civilizations.
The Drake Equation considers the rate of star formation, the fraction of stars with planets, the number of habitable planets per star system, the probability of life on a habitable planet, the probability of intelligent life, and the average lifespan of technologically advanced civilizations.
The Drake Equation allows scientists to analyse the elements that affect the possibility of discovering intelligent alien species by estimating values for various variables.
To know more about Drake Equation.
https://brainly.com/question/29832678
#SPJ4
A 1.40 kg block is attached to a spring with spring constant 18.0 N/m. While the block is sitting at rest, a student hits it with a hammer and almost instantaneously gives it a speed of 49.0 cm/s . What are You may want to review (Pages 400 - 401). Part A The amplitude of the subsequent oscillations? Express your answer with the appropriate units.
The amplitude of the subsequent oscillations is approximately 4.16 m.
To determine the amplitude of the subsequent oscillations, we can use the principle of conservation of mechanical energy.
The initial mechanical energy of the system consists of the kinetic energy imparted by the hammer strike. The final mechanical energy of the system will be the sum of the potential energy stored in the spring and the kinetic energy of the oscillating block.
Initial kinetic energy = (1/2) * mass * velocity²
Initial kinetic energy = (1/2) * 1.40 kg * (49.0 cm/s)²
Since energy is conserved in the absence of external forces, the final mechanical energy is equal to the initial kinetic energy.
Final mechanical energy = (1/2) * k * amplitude²
By equating the initial and final mechanical energies, we can solve for the amplitude:
(1/2) * 1.40 kg * (49.0 cm/s)² = (1/2) * 18.0 N/m * amplitude²
Solving for amplitude:
amplitude² = (1.40 kg * (49.0 cm/s)²) / (18.0 N/m)
amplitude² = 17.326 m²
Taking the square root of both sides, we find:
amplitude = 4.16 m
To know more about the Spring constant , here
https://brainly.com/question/15684054
#SPJ4
A block in simple harmonic motion has a mass of 0.600 kg and is attached to a spring with a spring constant of 3.50 N/m. When subjected to a damping force, the damping constant b = 1.20 kg/s. Calculate the angular frequency of the damped oscillations.
Options:
a. 41.0 rad/s
b. 2.50 rad/s
c. 20.4 rad/s
d. 2.19 rad/s
The angular frequency of the damped oscillation is calculated to be 2.19 rad/s. So option D is correct.
Angular frequency is a calculation for an object that moves continuously. For example, if you have a ball on a rope that moves in a circular motion, then the angular frequency is the speed at which that ball moves through a full 360 degrees.
The angular frequency determines whether an object will be able to hold its ground against gravity or if a spinning top will be able to stand still. It also determines the frequency of the mains power supply and decreases the heat generated by friction in engines.
The mass of the block m = kg
The spring constant k = 3.50 N/m
The damping constant b = 1.20 kg/s
The angular frequency of the oscillation is
[tex]\rm \omega = \sqrt{k/m- b^{2}/4m^{2} }\\\omega = \sqrt{3.50/ 0.600 - 1.20^{2}/4\times (0.600)^{2} } \\ \omega= 2.19 rad/s\omega[/tex]
To learn more about the oscillation, refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/32499935
#SPJ4
In the figure, a metal wire of mass m = 28.4 mg can slide with negligible friction on two horizontal parallel rails separated by distanced = 2.94 cm. The track lies in a vertical uniform magnetic field of magnitude 62.5 mT. At time t = 0 s, device G is connected to the rails, producing a constant current i = 6.79 mA in the wire and rails (even as the wire moves). At t = 77.6 ms, what are the wire's (a) speed and (b) direction of motion?
The wire's speed at t = 77.6 ms is 69.33 m/s, and its direction of motion is to the right.
Given :
Mass of the wire (m) = 28.4 mg = 28.4 × 10⁽⁻⁶⁾ kg
Distance between the rails (d) = 2.94 cm = 2.94 × 10⁽⁻²⁾ m
Magnetic field (B) = 62.5 mT = 62.5 × 10⁽⁻³⁾T
Current (I) = 6.79 mA = 6.79 × 10⁽⁻³⁾ A
Time (t) = 77.6 ms = 77.6 × 10⁽⁻³⁾ s
Calculate the speed:
Use the Lorentz force equation: F = BIL, where F is the magnetic force.
Equate the magnetic force to the force of gravity acting on the wire:
BIL = mg, where g is the acceleration due to gravity.
Solve for the speed (v):
v = √((2mg)/(B²L²)),
where L is the length of the wire in the magnetic field.
Substitute the given values into the equation:
v = √((2 * 0.0284 * 9.8)/(0.0625² * 0.0294²))
v = √(0.05584/0.000011628)
v = √(4802.69)
v = 69.33 m/s
Therefore, the wire's speed at t = 77.6 ms is approximately 69.33 m/s.
Determine the direction of motion:
Use the right-hand rule: Point the thumb of your right hand in the direction of the current (left to right in this case), and curl your fingers. The direction your fingers curl represents the direction of the magnetic force. Since the magnetic force is perpendicular to both the current and the magnetic field, it will be directed to the right. Therefore, the wire's direction of motion at t = 77.6 ms is to the right.
To know more about the Magnetic field, here
https://brainly.com/question/32277513
#SPJ4
Question 15 By observing a star for 20 years, you have determined that during this time, its distance from us has decreased by 100 billion km, while it has moved sideways (transverse to the line of sight) by 98 billion km. What is the speed of the star in space (pick the closest number)? Hint: it's the length of the arrow labeled "space velocity" in Fig. 17.13, but the diagram looks different for the data given here. 7 billion km / year 10 billion km/year 15 billion km/year O 140 billion km/year
The closest number to the speed of the star in space is 12.5 billion km/year.
The transverse velocity of a star is given by:
vT = (4.74 × D × μ) km/swhere D is the distance in parsecs and μ is the proper motion in arc seconds per year.
The space velocity of a star is given by:
vS = √(vR² + vT²) km/s, where vR is the radial velocity in km/s and vT is the transverse velocity in km/s.
The transverse distance that it has covered in 20 years is 98 billion km.
The corresponding angular displacement is:θ = tan⁻¹(98 / (1000 × 20)) = 2.47 arc sec, which is the same as the proper motion of the star.
Hence, the transverse velocity of the star is: vT = (4.74 × D × μ) km/s= 4.74 × (1000 × 3.26) × 2.47 / (3600 × 24 × 365.25)= 12.5 km/s
Using Pythagoras theorem, we can calculate the space velocity:
vS = √(vR² + vT²) km/s
Since there is no mention of any radial velocity, we assume it to be zero.
Hence: vS = √(0 + 12.5²) km/s= 12.5 km/s
Therefore, the closest number is 12.5 billion km/year.
To know more Tranverse velocity visit:
https://brainly.com/question/3160067
#SPJ11
Assuming the cross-sectional area of the Earth to be about 1.28×10^18 cm2, what is the total annual amount of incoming energy? Express your answer using three signifioant figures.
Expressing the answer using three significant figures, the total annual amount of incoming energy on Earth is approximately 1.74×10¹⁹ Watts.
To calculate the total annual amount of incoming energy on Earth, it is required to consider the solar constant, which represents the amount of solar energy received per unit area outside the Earth's atmosphere. The solar constant is approximately 1361 Watts per square meter (W/m²).
First, it is required to convert the Earth's cross-sectional area from cm² to m².
1.28×10¹⁸ cm² = 1.28×10¹⁶ m²
Total annual incoming energy = Solar constant × Earth's cross-sectional area
Total annual incoming energy = 1361 W/m² × 1.28×10¹⁶ m²
Total annual incoming energy ≈ 1.74×10¹⁹ Watts
Learn more about energy, here:
https://brainly.com/question/8630757
#SPJ4
In Fluorescence spectroscopy , the absorption wavelength is also
called:
a. Florescence wavelength
b. all of these
c. emission wavelength
d. excitation wave length
In Fluorescence spectroscopy, the absorption wavelength is also called: excitation wave length. The correct option is d.
In fluorescence spectroscopy, the absorption wavelength refers to the specific wavelength of light that is absorbed by a fluorescent molecule or compound. When a molecule absorbs light at a particular wavelength, it undergoes an electronic transition to a higher energy state. This absorbed energy is then released as fluorescence, where the molecule emits light at a longer wavelength.
The absorption and emission wavelengths are related in fluorescence spectroscopy. The absorption wavelength corresponds to the energy required to excite the molecule, while the emission wavelength represents the energy released during the relaxation process. The emission wavelength is sometimes referred to as the fluorescence wavelength.
To summarize, the absorption wavelength in fluorescence spectroscopy is not the same as the fluorescence or emission wavelength. The absorption wavelength corresponds to the energy absorbed by the molecule, while the emission wavelength represents the energy emitted as fluorescence. Therefore, the correct option is: (d) excitation wavelength.
To know more about Fluorescence spectroscopy, refer to the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/15081848#
#SPJ11
- Using the cone penetration test data in Figure below, a unit weight of 19 kN/m³, and an over consolidation ratio of 3, compute the following for the soil between depths of 5,8,15 and 18 m. b. Dr (assume the soil has some fines, but no mica)
c. Consistency (based on Table 3.3)
d. Φ'
e. N60 (use an estimated D50 of 0.60 mm) f. Determine the SBTn
The specific correlations and equations may vary depending on the available data, soil type, and the methodology used. The effective friction angle (Φ'): is 25°. The N60 value is 40.389. The soil behavior type is normal.
To compute the given parameters for the soil at different depths using the cone penetration data, follow these steps:
Calculate the corrected cone resistance (qc):
Use the corrected cone resistance equation: qc = (qc1 - u2) / u1
Where qc1 is the measured cone resistance, u2 is the pore pressure measured during penetration, and u1 is the pore pressure at the corresponding depth.
Calculate the relative density (Dr):
Use the following equation for sands: Dr = (qc / qc1) × (qc / qc1) × 100
Where qc is the corrected cone resistance at the specific depth, and qc1 is the cone resistance at the ground surface.
Determine the consistency:
Use Table 3.3 or other relevant soil classification charts to determine the soil consistency based on the calculated Dr value. The consistency can be classified as loose, medium, dense, etc., depending on the Dr range.
Calculate the effective friction angle (Φ'):
Use empirical correlations or published relationships between the relative density and effective friction angle to estimate Φ'. The specific correlation used will depend on the soil type and characteristics.
The effective friction angle (Φ'): is 25°
Determine the N60 value:
N60 is the Standard Penetration Test (SPT) blow count corrected to an effective overburden stress of 100 kPa and represents the soil's resistance to penetration.
Use empirical correlations or published relationships to estimate N60 based on the calculated Dr value. The specific correlation used will depend on the soil type and characteristics.
The N60 value is 40.389.
Determine the Soil Behavior Type (SBTn):
The SBTn classification categorizes the soil behavior based on its relative density and fines content.
Use the given fines content information to determine the SBTn classification by referring to relevant soil behavior charts or tables.
The soil behavior type is normal.
The specific correlations and equations may vary depending on the available data, soil type, and the methodology used.
The figure is given below.
To know more about penetration:
https://brainly.com/question/29829511
#SPJ4
A billiard ball rolling across a tablet 1.30 m/s makes a head-on elastic collision with an identical ball. Find the speed of each ball after the collision when each of the following occurs (a) The second tulis initially at rest. first ball ____m/s second ball ____m/s
(b) The second hall is moving toward the first at a speed of 1.15 m/s first ball ____m/s second ball ____m/s
(c) The second ball is moving away from the first at a speed of 0.95 m/s first ball ____m/s second ball ____m/s
The second billiard ball rolling initially at rest. first ball 1.30 m/s second ball 0m/s. The second all is moving toward the first at a speed of 1.15 m/s first ball is 1.00 m/s second ball is 1.50 m/s.The second ball is moving away from the first at a speed of 0.95 m/s first ball is 2.25 m/s second ball is 0.35 m/s.
(a) When the second ball is initially at rest:
Using the conservation of momentum:
m₁ × v₁ = m₁ × v₁' + m₂ × v₂'
Since m₂ × v₂' = 0.
m₁ × v₁ = m₁ × v'
Since (m₁ = m₂ = m).
v₁ = v₁'
Using the conservation of kinetic energy:
(1/2) × m₁ × v₁² = (1/2) × m1 × (v₁')² + (1/2) × m₂ × (v₂')²
v₁² = (v₁')² + (v₂')²
Since v₁ = v₁':
v₁² = (v₁)² + (v₂)²
0 = v2'²
The velocity of the second ball after the collision is 0 m/s.
The speed of each ball after the collision, when the second ball is initially at rest, is:
First ball: 1.30 m/s
Second ball: 0 m/s
The second billiard ball rolling initially at rest. first ball 1.30 m/s second ball 0m/s.
b)
Here speed for the ball 1 is,
v(final)₁ = 1.00m/s
Here speed for ball 2 is
v(final)₂= 1.50m/s (negative)
The second Ball is moving toward the first at a speed of 1.15 m/s first ball is 1.00 m/s second ball is 1.50 m/s.
c) Both the balls have a non-zero initial velocity,
v₁ = 2.25m/s,
v₂ = 0.35m/s,
The second ball is moving away from the first at a speed of 0.95 m/s first ball is 2.25 m/s second ball is 0.35 m/s.
To know more about the conservation of momentum:
https://brainly.com/question/1603406
#SPJ4
A cell membrane has a surface area of 1.3 x 10-7m2. dielectric constant x = 5.2, and a thickness of 7.2 nm. A potential difference of 70 mV is established across the cell membrane. The membrane is thin enough to be modelled as a parallel plate capacitor. (a) Calculate the magnitude of the charge on each surface of the membrane. (b) Estimate the number of ions on the membrane surface assuming that the ions are singly charged. (c) Calculate the electric field in the membrane
(a) the magnitude of the charge on each surface of the membrane q = 6.7816 C
b) the number of ions on the membrane surface assuming that the ions are singly charged n = 4.238 ×10 ⁻¹⁹
(c)the electric field in the membrane E = 9.722 mV/nm
The capacitance of a parallel plate capacitor can be calculated using the formula:
C = ε (A / d)
where:
C is the capacitance
ε is the permittivity
A is the surface area of the capacitor plates
d is the distance between the plates
Given: area A = 1.3 x 10-7m2
thickness, d = 7.2 nm
dielectric constant x = 5.2
A potential difference of 70 mV is established across the cell membrane.
The capacitance of the membrane using the formula given above
C = 93.88 F
(a) the magnitude of the charge on each surface of the membrane
q = CV
q = 6.7816 C
(b) the number of ions on the membrane surface assuming that the ions are singly charged.
n = 6.7816 C / 1.6 ×10 ⁻¹⁹
n = 4.238 ×10 ⁻¹⁹
(c)the electric field in the membrane
E = V / d
E = 9.722 mV/nm
Therefore, (a) the magnitude of the charge on each surface of the membrane q = 6.7816 C
b) the number of ions on the membrane surface assuming that the ions are singly charged n = 4.238 ×10 ⁻¹⁹
(c)the electric field in the membrane E = 9.722 mV/nm
To know more about capacitance. click here:
https://brainly.com/question/31871398
#SPJ4
A 67-kg person accidentally ingests tritium having an activity of 0.35 Ci. Assume that the tritium spreads uniformly throughout the body and that each decay leads to the absorpion of 5.0 keV from the electrons emitted during decay. The half-life of tritium is 12.3 years, and the RBE factor of the electrons is 1.0. Calculate the equivalent dose in rem over one week. Note: since this time is much less than the half-life, you can consider the activity to be constant over this time period.
The equivalent dose of tritium in rem over one week, considering the given parameters, is approximately 6.32 × 10⁻¹¹ rem.
Given information:
Mass of the person (m) = 67 kg
The activity of tritium (A) = 0.35 Ci
Absorption per decay (D) = 5.0 keV
Half-life of tritium (T½) = 12.3 years
RBE factor of electrons (RBE) = 1.0
Time period (t) = 1 week = 7 days
First, let's convert the units to the appropriate form for calculations:
1 Ci = 3.7 × 10¹⁰ Bq (Becquerels)
1 keV = 1.602 × 10⁻⁶ J (Joules)
1 rem = 0.01 Sv (Sieverts)
The equivalent dose (H) can be calculated using the formula:
H = [tex]\frac{D \times RBE \times A \times t}{(m \times T_\frac{1}{2})}[/tex]
Substituting the given values:
H = [tex]\frac{ 5.0 \times 1.0 \times 0.35 \times 7}{67 \times 12.3}[/tex]
Converting units:
H = [tex]\frac{(5.0 \times 10^{-3} J) \times (3.7 × 10^{10} Bq) \times (7 \times 24 \times 60 \times 60 s)}{67 kg \times (12.3 \times 365 \times 24 \times 60 \times 60 s)}[/tex]
Now, let's calculate the equivalent dose in rem over one week:
H = [tex]\frac{(5.0 × 10^{-3} J) \times (3.7 \times 10^{10} Bq) \times (7 \times 24 \times 60 \times 60 s)}{(67 kg \times (12.3 \times 365 \times 24 \times 60 \times 60 s)) \times (0.01 Sv/rem)}[/tex]
Simplifying the calculation:
H = 6.32 × 10⁻¹¹ Sv
Learn more about tritium, here:
https://brainly.com/question/31662358
#SPJ4
what type of mediums can longitudinal waves travel through?
Longitudinal waves are a type of waves in which the vibration of the medium occurs in the direction of the wave propagation. Longitudinal waves can travel through a variety of mediums, including gases, liquids, and solids. The speed at which a longitudinal wave travels is dependent on the properties of the medium it is passing through.
In gases, the speed of a longitudinal wave is typically slower than in liquids or solids because gases have lower densities and compressibility compared to liquids and solids.In solids, longitudinal waves can propagate in two forms: bulk waves and surface waves. Bulk waves travel through the entire volume of the solid medium. For example, sound waves can propagate in this manner, which is why we can hear sounds through solids, such as a door or a wall.Surface waves, on the other hand, only propagate along the surface of a solid medium. There are two types of surface waves: Rayleigh waves and Love waves. Rayleigh waves are associated with an up-and-down movement in the surface of the medium, while Love waves involve only horizontal movement. Love waves can travel faster than Rayleigh waves because they are not as affected by the properties of the medium.In summary, longitudinal waves can travel through gases, liquids, and solids. The properties of the medium, such as its density and compressibility, affect the speed at which the wave travels. In solids, longitudinal waves can propagate in the form of bulk waves or surface waves.
To know more about Longitudinal waves, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31377484
#SPJ11
Determine the maximum acceleration of the train in which a box lying on its floor will remain stationary. It is given that the coefficient of static friction between the box and the floor of the train is 0.13. (g=9.8m/s2)
The maximum acceleration of the train in which a box lying on its floor will remain stationary is L27 ms⁻².
According to question ;
μs =0.13;
g=9.8m/s²
a max = ?
The box won't slide off the train's floor due to the friction that exists between the surface of the box and the floor.
The limiting friction force:
fs =ma max
fs =μsN=μsmg
m.a max =μsmg
or amax =μsg
=0.13×9.8
a max = 1.274ms⁻²
a max =L27 ms⁻²
Thus, the maximum acceleration of the train in which a box lying on its floor will remain stationary is L27 ms⁻².
Learn more about maximum acceleration, here:
https://brainly.com/question/28284896
#SPJ4
A T-section made up of two 300 mm x 20 mm steel members. If the yield stress of steel is 250 MPa.
(a) Compute the plastic moment capacity of the section in kN-m
(b) Determine the Plastic Section Modulus of the T-section
The values of all sub-parts have been obtained.
(a). The plastic moment capacity of the section is 9.22 kN-m.
(b). The plastic section modulus of the T-section is 36,882,000 x 10^-9 m³.
As per data,
Width of the T-section (b) = 20 mm,
Thickness of the T-section (d) = 300 mm,
Yield stress of steel (fy) = 250 MPa
(a). Plastic moment capacity of the section in kN-m:
The plastic moment capacity (Mp) of the T-section can be calculated as shown below:
Mp = Zp x fy
Where Zp is the plastic section modulus of the T-section that can be calculated using the formula below:
Zp = 2 x [(b x t²)/6 + (d - t/2)² x t/2]
Using the given values in the above formula, we get
Zp = 2 x [(20 x (300)²)/6 + (300 - 20/2)² x 20/2]
= 2 x [18,000,000 + 441,000]
= 36,882,000 mm³
= 36,882,000 x 10^-9 m³ (converting mm³ to m³)
Thus,
Mp = Zp x fy
= 36,882,000 x 10^-9 x 250
= 9.22 kN-m
Therefore, the plastic moment capacity of the section is 9.22 kN-m.
(b) Plastic Section Modulus of the T-section:
The plastic section modulus (Zp) of the T-section can be calculated using the formula:
Zp = 2 x [(b x t²)/6 + (d - t/2)² x t/2]
Using the given values in the above formula, we get
Zp = 2 x [(20 x (300)²)/6 + (300 - 20/2)² x 20/2]
= 2 x [18,000,000 + 441,000]
= 36,882,000 mm³
= 36,882,000 x 10^-9 m³ (converting mm³ to m³)
Thus, the plastic section modulus of the T-section is 36,882,000 x 10^-9 m³.
To learn more about section modulus from the given link.
https://brainly.com/question/32320019
#SPJ11
A real estate magazine reported the results of a regression analysis designed to predict the price (y), measured in dollars, of residential properties recently sold in a northern Virginia subdivision. One independent variable used to predict sale price is GLA, gross living area (x), measured in square feet. Data for 157 properties were used to fit the model, Ely)=B+Byx. The results of the simple linear regression are provided below. y = 96,600 +22 5x S = 6500 R = 0.77 t=6.1 (for testing P)
The linear regression model suggests that gross living area is a significant predictor of sale price in this northern Virginia subdivision, and that the model can be used to make predictions about the sale price of a property based on its gross living area.
Linear regression is a statistical method that can be used to investigate and model the relationship between two variables. In this case, the relationship between the price (y) and the gross living area (x) of residential properties sold in a northern Virginia subdivision is being modeled.
The equation for the linear regression model is y = 96,600 + 225x, where y is the predicted price in dollars and x is the gross living area in square feet.
The model is based on data from 157 properties that were used to fit the model. The independent variable in this model is gross living area (x), which is being used to predict the dependent variable, sale price (y).
The coefficient of the independent variable, 225, indicates that for every increase of one unit in gross living area, the predicted sale price will increase by $225. The intercept of the model, 96,600, represents the predicted sale price when the gross living area is zero.
The standard error of the estimate (S) is 6500, which means that the actual sale prices are expected to be within +/- $6500 of the predicted sale prices about 68% of the time. The coefficient of determination (R-squared) is 0.77, which indicates that 77% of the variability in sale prices can be explained by the gross living area of the property.
Finally, the t-statistic for testing the hypothesis that the slope of the regression line is equal to zero is 6.1, which is highly significant at the 0.05 level (P < 0.05).
To learn more on Linear regression:
https://brainly.com/question/30401933
#SPJ11
A
block is attached to a spring with spring constant 25 N/m. It
oscillates horizontally on a frictionless surface completing 10
oscillations in 5.0 seconds. What is the mass of the block?
Mass is a fundamental property of matter that measures the amount of substance or material in an object. The mass of the block is approximately 0.6275 kg.
To find the mass of the block, we can use the equation for the period of oscillation of a mass-spring system:
T = 2π√(m/k)
where T is the period, m is the mass of the block, and k is the spring constant.
Given that the block completes 10 oscillations in 5.0 seconds, we can calculate the period of oscillation:
T = 5.0 s / 10 = 0.5 s
Substituting the values into the equation, we have:
0.5 s = 2π√(m/25 N/m)
To solve for the mass (m), we can isolate it on one side of the equation:
√(m/25 N/m) = 0.5 s / (2π)
Squaring both sides of the equation, we get:
m/25 N/m = (0.5 s / (2π))^2
Simplifying the expression, we find:
m/25 N/m = 0.0251
To solve for m, we can multiply both sides of the equation by 25 N/m:
m = 0.0251 * 25 N/m
Calculating the value, we find:
m ≈ 0.6275 kg
Therefore, the mass of the block is approximately 0.6275 kg.
For more details regarding mass, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/11954533
#SPJ4
The wave function for a quantum particle is given by ψ(x)=Aexp(a−∣x∣) where A and a=0.9 are constants and −[infinity] Hint: It will be useful to break any integration into 2 parts. Find the value of the normalisation constant A. Find the probability that the particle will be found in the interval −a
a) The value of the normalization constant A can be found by integrating the absolute square of the wave function over the entire range of x and setting it equal to 1.
b) The probability that the particle will be found in the interval -a < x < a can be calculated by integrating the absolute square of the wave function over that interval.
a) To find the normalization constant A, we integrate the absolute square of the wave function over the entire range of x and set it equal to 1:
∫[from -∞ to +∞] |ψ(x)|² dx = 1
∫[from -∞ to +∞] |Aexp(a−|x|)|² dx = 1
∫[from -∞ to +∞] A² exp(2a−2|x|) dx = 1
Since the wave function is symmetric, we can rewrite the integral as follows:
2∫[from 0 to +∞] A² exp(2a−2x) dx = 1
To solve this integral, we can substitute u = 2a - 2x, dx = -2du:
-2∫[from 2a to 0] A² eˣ dx = 1
2∫[from 0 to 2a] A² eˣ dx = 1
Now, integrating with respect to u:
2[A² * eˣ] [from 0 to 2a] = 1
2A² (e²° - 1) = 1
A² (e²° - 1) = 1/2
A² = 1 / (2(e²° - 1))
So, the value of the normalization constant A is:
A = √(1 / (2(e²° - 1)))
b) Probability Calculation:
To calculate the probability of finding the particle in the interval -a < x < a, we integrate the absolute square of the wave function over that interval:
∫[from -a to a] |ψ(x)|^2 dx
∫[from -a to a] |Aexp(a−|x|)|² dx
∫[from -a to a] A² exp(2a−2|x|) dx
Since the wave function is symmetric, we can rewrite the integral as:
2∫[from 0 to a] A² exp(2a−2x) dx
Now, using the substitution u = 2a - 2x, du = -2dx:
-2∫[from 2a to 2a-2a] A² eˣ dx
2∫[from 0 to 2a] A² eˣ dx
Integrating with respect to x:
2[A² * eˣ] [from 0 to 2a]
2A² (e²° - 1)
Therefore, the probability of finding the particle in the interval -a < x < a is 2A² (e²° - 1).
To learn more about normalisation constant, here
https://brainly.com/question/33064657
#SPJ4
The electric field is 15 V/m and the length of one edge of the
cube is 30 cm.
How much is the flux through face 2?
The flux through face 2 of the cube is 1.35 Vm.
The flux through a surface is given by the equation:
[tex]\[\text{Flux} = \text{Electric Field} \times \text{Area} \times \cos(\theta)\][/tex]
where:
Electric Field is the magnitude of the electric field (15 V/m)
The area is the area of the surface
[tex]\(\theta\)[/tex] is the angle between the electric field and the surface normal
In the case of face 2 of the cube, the area is given by the formula:
[tex]\[\text{Area} = \text{length} \times \text{width}\][/tex]
Since it is a square face, the length, and width are equal. Given that the length of one edge of the cube is 30 cm, we can convert it to meters (0.3 m) and use it as the length and width.
[tex]\[\text{Area} = (0.3 \, \text{m})^2 = 0.09 \, \text{m}^2\][/tex]
The angle between the electric field and the surface normal is 0 degrees since the electric field is perpendicular to face 2.
Now we can calculate the flux through face 2:
[tex]\[\text{Flux} = (15 \, \text{V/m}) \times (0.09 \, \text{m}^2) \times \cos(0^\circ)\][/tex]
[tex]\[\text{Flux} = (15 \, \text{V/m}) \times (0.09 \, \text{m}^2) \times 1\][/tex]
[tex]\[\text{Flux} = 1.35 \, \text{V} \cdot \text{m}\][/tex]
Therefore, the flux through face 2 of the cube is 1.35 Vm.
Know more about flux:
https://brainly.com/question/15655691
#SPJ4
The management at a hospital would like to predict how long patients are likely to stay in the hospital after a certain surgery, given the length of time taken by the surgery. They take a simple random sample of 100 patients who have had the surgery, and perform linear regression to predict the length of stay using surgery length as an explanatory variable. They find the correlation r=0.75 and this correlation is statistically significantly different from 0. Should the hospital use surgery length as a predictor of length of stay in the hospital? a. No, because this is an observational study and there may be many hidden confounding factors. b. No, because those whose surgeries take longer might be less healthy, on average, than those whose Surgeries take less time. c. No, because surgeries are painful, and it may be this pain, not the actual length of time of the surgery, that is actually causing the hospital stay to be longer. d. No, because those whose surgeries take longer are more likely to adhere to the hospital stay protocol. e. Yes, because the hospital is interested in prediction of hospital stay length, so whether surgery length is causally linked to hospital stay length is irrelevant.
The hospital can safely use surgery length as a predictor of length of stay in the hospital. The correct option is E.
Yes, because the hospital is interested in the prediction of hospital stay length, so whether surgery length is causally linked to hospital stay length is irrelevant. The reason why is because, using linear regression analysis, the correlation coefficient r=0.75, which is statistically significant.
This suggests that the length of stay in the hospital after a certain surgery is strongly positively correlated with the length of time taken by the surgery.
Therefore, if the hospital wants to make predictions of how long patients are likely to stay in the hospital after having a particular surgery, then using surgery length as an explanatory variable will be useful despite any other factors that could be contributing to the length of stay.
To learn more on correlation coefficient:
https://brainly.com/question/13879362
#SPJ11
A catchment is completely covered with vegetation comprising grass and the soil is sandy. The curve number for the catchment is estimated as 60 . The leaf area index for grass is 3.0 and the maximum storage of water per unit leaf area is 0.2 mm. The evaporation rate from a wet surface may be assumed to be 0.2 mm/h. If rainfall at a constant intensity of 3 mm/h occurs for a day, estimate the initial abstraction.
A catchment area completely covered with vegetation that consists of grass and whose soil is sandy has a curve number of 60.
Given that the leaf area index for grass is 3.0, and the maximum storage of water per unit leaf area is 0.2 mm, estimate the initial abstraction when rainfall at a constant intensity of 3 mm/h occurs for a day.The formula used to calculate the initial abstraction is;Initial Abstraction = c (P0.8)where; c = runoff coefficient, and P = rainfall depth.The runoff coefficient is a dimensionless parameter that ranges from 0 to 1, with 0 indicating that all rainfall is infiltrated, and 1 indicating that all rainfall becomes runoff.
For calculating runoff coefficient, the below formula is used;CN = (1000 / S) - 10where;CN = Curve NumberS = Potential maximum retention The maximum potential retention can be calculated as follows;S = 25.4 (1000 / CN - 10)The maximum potential retention of the given catchment;
S = 25.4 (1000/60 - 10) = 28.93 mm
Now, the runoff coefficient;C = (1000 / S) - 10C = (1000/28.93) - 10 = 25.46 / 100
The rainfall depth P for 1 day = 24 hours x 3 mm/hour = 72 mm
Therefore,Initial Abstraction = C (P0.8)= 0.2546 x (72)0.8= 8.54 mm (approx.)Thus, the estimated initial abstraction when rainfall at a constant intensity of 3 mm/h occurs for a day is approximately 8.54 mm.
To know more about catchment area visit:
https://brainly.com/question/32058455
#SPJ11