Which of the following is NOT an assumption of a one-way ANOVA? A. None of these B. The data are randomly sampled C. The variances of each sample are assumed equal D. The residuals are normally distributed

To find a vector u such that the transformation T maps u to the given vector b, we need to solve the equation T(u) = b, where T is defined by T(u) = Au. The matrix A represents the transformation.

In this case, the given matrix A and vector b are provided, and we need to determine if there exists a vector u that satisfies the equation T(u) = b.

To find u, we need to solve the equation Au = b. This can be done by multiplying the inverse of A to both sides of the equation: u = A^(-1)b. However, for this to be possible, the matrix A must be invertible.

To determine if A is invertible, we can calculate its determinant. If the determinant is non-zero, then A is invertible, and there exists a vector u that maps to b. Otherwise, if the determinant is zero, A is not invertible, and no such vector u exists.

Calculating the determinant of A, we have:

det(A) = (3 * (-2) * 3) + (-9 * 8 * (-1)) + (9 * (-3) * 1) - (9 * (-2) * (-1)) - (3 * 3 * 9) - (3 * (-1) * (-3))

= -54 + 72 - 27 + 18 - 81 + 27

= -45

Since the determinant is non-zero (-45 ≠ 0), the matrix A is invertible. Therefore, there exists a vector u that maps to the given vector b. To find u, we can compute u = A^(-1)b. However, further calculations are required to determine the specific vector u.

To learn more about vector click here:

brainly.com/question/24256726

#SPJ11

a. The two binomials that are being multiplied in the algebra tiles above include the following: (2x + 3)(3x + 2).

b. The product shown by the algebra tiles include the following: 6x² + 13x + 6.

In Mathematics and Geometry, a factored form simply refers to a type of polynomial function that is typically written as the product of two (2) linear factors and a constant.

Part a.

By critically observing the base of this algebra tiles, we can logically deduce that it is composed of two x tiles and three 1 tiles. This ultimately implies that, the base represents (2x + 3).

The height of this algebra tiles is composed of three x tiles and two 1 tiles. This ultimately implies that, the base represents (3x + 2).

Part b.

Next, we would determine the product of the two binomials as follows;

(2x + 3)(3x + 2) = 6x² + 4x + 9x + 6

6x² + 4x + 9x + 6 = 6x² + 13x + 6.

Read more on factored form here: brainly.com/question/30285637

#SPJ1

(1)Therefore, for an 85% confidence level, the critical t-score is t = ±1.8946. (2) Therefore, for a 95% confidence level, the critical t-score is t = ±2.3646. (3) Therefore, for a 98% confidence level, the critical t-score is t = ±2.9979.

To find the critical t-scores for the given confidence intervals, we need to consider the sample size and the desired confidence level. Since the sample size is small (n = 8), we'll use the t-distribution instead of the standard normal distribution.

The degrees of freedom for a sample of size n can be calculated as (n - 1). Therefore, for this problem, the degrees of freedom would be (8 - 1) = 7.

To find the critical t-scores, we can use statistical tables or calculators. Here are the critical t-scores for the given confidence intervals:

(1)85% Confidence Level:

The confidence level is 85%, which means the alpha level (α) is (1 - confidence level) = 0.15. Since the distribution is symmetric, we divide this alpha level into two equal tails, giving us α/2 = 0.075 for each tail.

Using the degrees of freedom (df = 7) and the alpha/2 value, we can find the critical t-score.

From the t-distribution table or calculator, the critical t-score for an 85% confidence level with 7 degrees of freedom is approximately ±1.8946 (rounded to 4 decimal places).

Therefore, for an 85% confidence level, the critical t-score is t = ±1.8946.

(2)95% Confidence Level:

The confidence level is 95%, so the alpha level is (1 - confidence level) = 0.05. Dividing this alpha level equally into two tails, we have α/2 = 0.025 for each tail.

Using df = 7 and α/2 = 0.025, we can find the critical t-score.

From the t-distribution table or calculator, the critical t-score for a 95% confidence level with 7 degrees of freedom is approximately ±2.3646 (rounded to 4 decimal places).

Therefore, for a 95% confidence level, the critical t-score is t = ±2.3646.

(3)98% Confidence Level:

The confidence level is 98%, implying an alpha level of (1 - confidence level) = 0.02. Dividing this alpha level equally into two tails, we get α/2 = 0.01 for each tail.

Using df = 7 and α/2 = 0.01, we can determine the critical t-score.

From the t-distribution table or calculator, the critical t-score for a 98% confidence level with 7 degrees of freedom is approximately ±2.9979 (rounded to 4 decimal places).

Therefore, for a 98% confidence level, the critical t-score is t = ±2.9979.

To summarize, the critical t-scores for the given confidence intervals are:

85% Confidence Level: t = ±1.8946

95% Confidence Level: t = ±2.3646

98% Confidence Level: t = ±2.9979

To know more about confidence intervals:

https://brainly.com/question/32068659

#SPJ4

These values in the equation y = mx + c to predict the price of Real Estate for a given value of Square Feet.

For this question, we need to perform the following two tasks:Create a normal curve problem and solve it.Predict the price of the Real Estate using Square Feet as the X variable.Create a normal curve problem and solve itTo create a normal curve problem, we can use the given mean and standard deviation. Suppose the given mean is μ and the standard deviation is σ. Then the probability of a value x can be calculated as:P(x) = (1 / (σ * √(2 * π))) * e^(-((x - μ)^2) / (2 * σ^2))

Now, using this formula, we can calculate the required probabilities. For example, the probability of the population above some value is:P(x > a) = ∫[a, ∞] P(x) dxSimilarly, the probability of the population between two values a and b is:P(a < x < b) = ∫[a, b] P(x) dxPredict the price of the Real Estate using Square Feet as the X variableTo predict the price of the Real Estate using Square Feet as the X variable, we can use linear regression.

Linear regression finds the line of best fit that passes through the given data points. Here, we have Price as the Y variable and Square Feet as the X variable.

We need to find a linear equation y = mx + c that best represents this data.To find this equation, we can use the following formulas:m = (nΣxy - ΣxΣy) / (nΣx^2 - (Σx)^2)c = (Σy - mΣx) / nHere, n is the number of data points, Σ represents the sum, and x and y represent the variables.

Using these formulas, we can calculate the values of m and c.

Then, we can substitute these values in the equation y = mx + c to predict the price of Real Estate for a given value of Square Feet.

For more questions on price.

https://brainly.com/question/23865811

#SPJ8

P(BND) = 0.65, P(B U D) = 0.65 and the probability that a student does not select a book nor a DVD is 0.35.

a.P(BND) = 0.3015

b.P(B U D) = 0.65

To find the probability of both events B and D occurring, we use the formula P(BND) = P(B) * P(D|B). Given that P(B) = 0.45 and P(D|B) = 0.67 (which is the probability of D given that B has occurred), we can calculate P(BND) as follows:

P(BND) = 0.45 * 0.67 = 0.3015.

b.P(B U D) = 0.65

To find the probability of either event B or event D or both occurring, we use the formula P(B U D) = P(B) + P(D) - P(BND). Given that P(B) = 0.45, P(D) = 0.50, and we already calculated P(BND) as 0.3015, we can calculate P(B U D) as follows:

P(B U D) = 0.45 + 0.50 - 0.3015 = 0.6485 ≈ 0.65.

P(not selecting a book nor a DVD) = 0.05

The probability of not selecting a book nor a DVD is the complement of selecting either a book or a DVD or both. Since P(B U D) represents the probability of selecting either a book or a DVD or both, the complement of P(B U D) will give us the probability of not selecting a book nor a DVD:

P(not selecting a book nor a DVD) = 1 - P(B U D) = 1 - 0.65 = 0.35 = 0.05.

To learn more about probability visit:

https://brainly.com/question/13604758

#SPJ11

Insufficient information is given to calculate the likelihood of the result or evaluate the sample's representativeness.

Based on the given information, it is unclear what percentage of adults said they regularly participated in at least one sport in Country A, as it was not provided in the question.

Therefore, it is not possible to calculate the likelihood of the result or evaluate the sample based on the given information. To determine the representativeness of the sample, we would need the actual percentage of adults who said they regularly participated in at least one sport and compare it with the sample percentage.

Without that information, it is not possible to determine if the sample is good or not.

To learn more about “percentage” refer to the https://brainly.com/question/24877689

#SPJ11

To find a vector normal to the sphere at the point P(4), we need to compute the partial derivatives of the parametric equation and evaluate them at the given point.

The parametric equation of the sphere is given by: x(u, v) = cos(u) cos(v); y(u, v) = sin(u) cos(v); z(u, v) = sin(v). Taking the partial derivatives with respect to u and v, we have: ∂x/∂u = -sin(u) cos(v); ∂x/∂v = -cos(u) sin(v); ∂y/∂u = cos(u) cos(v);∂y/∂v = -sin(u) sin(v); ∂z/∂u = 0; ∂z/∂v = cos(v). Now, we can evaluate these derivatives at the point P(4):  u = 4; v = √2. ∂x/∂u = -sin(4) cos(√2); ∂x/∂v = -cos(4) sin(√2); ∂y/∂u = cos(4) cos(√2); ∂y/∂v = -sin(4) sin(√2); ∂z/∂u = 0;∂z/∂v = cos(√2). So, the vector normal to the sphere at the point P(4) is given by: N = (∂x/∂u, ∂y/∂u, ∂z/∂u) = (-sin(4) cos(√2), cos(4) cos(√2), 0).

Therefore, the vector normal to the sphere at the point P(4) is (-sin(4) cos(√2), cos(4) cos(√2), 0).

To learn more about vector   click here: brainly.com/question/29740341

#SPJ11

Answer:

We do not have sufficient evidence to conclude that the variances of the two populations differ at the 0.05 significance level.

To determine whether the variances of the two populations differ, we can perform a hypothesis test using the F-test.

The null hypothesis (H0) states that the variances of the two populations are equal, while the alternative hypothesis (Ha) states that the variances are different.

The test statistic for the F-test is calculated as the ratio of the sample variances: F = s12 / s22.

For the given sample data, we have s12 = 64.2 and s22 = 135.1. Plugging these values into the formula, we get F ≈ 0.475.

To conduct the hypothesis test, we compare the calculated F-value to the critical F-value. The critical value is determined based on the significance level (α) and the degrees of freedom for the two samples.

In this case, α = 0.05 and the degrees of freedom for the two samples are (n1 - 1) = 4 and (n2 - 1) = 10, respectively.

Using an F-table or a calculator, we can find the critical F-value with α = 0.05 and degrees of freedom (4, 10) to be approximately 4.26.

Since the calculated F-value (0.475) is less than the critical F-value (4.26), we fail to reject the null hypothesis. Therefore, we do not have sufficient evidence to conclude that the variances of the two populations differ at the 0.05 significance level.

Note that the conclusion may change if a different significance level is chosen.

Learn more about variances from below link

https://brainly.com/question/9304306

#SPJ11

We do not have sufficient evidence to conclude that the variances of the two populations differ at the 0.05 significance level.

To determine whether the variances of the two populations differ, we can perform a hypothesis test using the F-test.

The null hypothesis (H0) states that the variances of the two populations are equal, while the alternative hypothesis (Ha) states that the variances are different.

The test statistic for the F-test is calculated as the ratio of the sample variances: F = s12 / s22.

For the given sample data, we have s12 = 64.2 and s22 = 135.1. Plugging these values into the formula, we get F ≈ 0.475.

To conduct the hypothesis test, we compare the calculated F-value to the critical F-value. The critical value is determined based on the significance level (α) and the degrees of freedom for the two samples.

In this case, O = 0.05 and the degrees of freedom for the two samples are (n1 - 1) = 4 and (n2 - 1) = 10, respectively.

Using an F-table or a calculator, we can find the critical F-value with o = 0.05 and degrees of freedom (4, 10) to be approximately 4.26.

Since the calculated F-value (0.475) is less than the critical F-value (4.26), we fail to reject the null hypothesis. Therefore, we do not have sufficient evidence to conclude that the variances of the two populations differ at the 0.05 significance level.

Note that the conclusion may change if a different significance level is chosen.

Learn more about variances from below link

brainly.com/question/9304306

#SPJ11

a) Prob(lower < z < upper) ≈ 0.3617

b) The advantage of a larger sample size when attempting to estimate the population mean is that it leads to a smaller standard error (SE)

To solve this problem, we'll use the Central Limit Theorem and the properties of the normal distribution.

Given:

Population proportion (p) = 0.33

Population mean (μ) = $15,999

Standard deviation (σ) = $2,262

a) Probability of sample mean within $224 of the population mean for different sample sizes:

To calculate this probability, we need to find the standard error (SE) of the sample mean first. The formula for the standard error is:

SE = σ / √(n)

where σ is the population standard deviation and n is the sample size.

For each sample size, we'll calculate the standard error (SE) and then use the z-table to find the corresponding probability.

For n = 30:

SE = 2262 / √(30) ≈ 412.9404

To find the probability, we'll calculate the z-scores for the lower and upper limits:

Lower z-score = (224 - 0) / 412.9404 ≈ 0.5423

Upper z-score = (-224 - 0) / 412.9404 ≈ -0.5423

Using the z-table, we find the probabilities associated with these z-scores:

Prob(lower < z < upper) = Prob(0.5423 < z < -0.5423)

Now, we'll look up the z-scores in the z-table and subtract the corresponding probabilities to find the desired probability:

Prob(lower < z < upper) ≈ 0.3716

Therefore, the probability that a sample of size 30 will show a sample mean within $224 of the population mean is approximately 0.3716.

Repeat the same process for the other sample sizes:

For n = 50:

SE = 2262 / sqrt(50) ≈ 319.4132

Lower z-score ≈ 0.7005

Upper z-score ≈ -0.7005

Prob(lower < z < upper) ≈ 0.3530

For n = 100:

SE = 2262 / sqrt(100) ≈ 226.2

Lower z-score ≈ 0.9911

Upper z-score ≈ -0.9911

Prob(lower < z < upper) ≈ 0.3382

For n = 400:

SE = 2262 / sqrt(400) ≈ 113.1

Lower z-score ≈ 1.9823

Upper z-score ≈ -1.9823

Prob(lower < z < upper) ≈ 0.3617

b) The advantage of a larger sample size when attempting to estimate the population mean is that it leads to a smaller standard error (SE). A smaller SE means that the sample mean is more likely to be close to the population mean. As the sample size increases, the sample mean becomes a better estimate of the population mean, resulting in a higher probability of the sample mean being within a specified distance of the population mean.

In this instance, the probability of being within ±$224 of μ ranges from 0.3716 for a sample of size 30 to 0.3617 for a sample of size 400. The larger sample size (400) has a slightly higher probability of the sample mean being within ±$224 of the population mean, indicating a better estimation.

Learn more about Probability here

https://brainly.com/question/32117953

#SPJ4

The linear regression model for the data is Y ≈ 0.0012X + 0.608

A linear regression model relating temperature and the proportion of impurities passing through solid helium, we'll use the method of least squares to find the equation of a line that best fits the given data.

Let's denote the temperature as X and the proportion of impurities as Y. We have the following data points:

X: -260.5, -255.7, -264.6, -265.0, -270.0, -272.0, -272.5, -272.6, -272.8, -272.9

Y: 0.425, 0.224, 0.453, 0.475, 0.705, 0.860, 0.935, 0.961, 0.979, 0.990

We want to find the equation of a line in the form Y = aX + b, where a is the slope and b is the y-intercept.

To calculate the slope a and y-intercept b, we'll use the following formulas:

a = (nΣ(XY) - ΣXΣY) / (nΣ(X²) - (ΣX)²)

b = (ΣY - aΣX) / n

where n is the number of data points.

Let's calculate the necessary summations:

ΣX = -260.5 + (-255.7) + (-264.6) + (-265.0) + (-270.0) + (-272.0) + (-272.5) + (-272.6) + (-272.8) + (-272.9) = -2704.6

ΣY = 0.425 + 0.224 + 0.453 + 0.475 + 0.705 + 0.860 + 0.935 + 0.961 + 0.979 + 0.990 = 7.017

Σ(XY) = (-260.5)(0.425) + (-255.7)(0.224) + (-264.6)(0.453) + (-265.0)(0.475) + (-270.0)(0.705) + (-272.0)(0.860) + (-272.5)(0.935) + (-272.6)(0.961) + (-272.8)(0.979) + (-272.9)(0.990) = -2517.384

Σ(X²) = (-260.5)² + (-255.7)² + (-264.6)² + (-265.0)² + (-270.0)² + (-272.0)² + (-272.5)² + (-272.6)² + (-272.8)² + (-272.9)² = 729153.05

Now, let's substitute these values into the formulas for a and b:

a = (10(-2517.384) - (-2704.6)(7.017)) / (10(729153.05) - (-2704.6)^2)

b = (7.017 - a(-2704.6)) / 10

Simplifying the calculations, we find:

a ≈ 0.0012

b ≈ 0.608

Therefore, the linear regression model for the given data is:

Y ≈ 0.0012X + 0.608

To know more about linear regression model click here :

https://brainly.com/question/29297993

#SPJ4

The probability that the sample mean is greater than 2.7 is given as follows:

0%.

We first must use the z-score formula, as follows:

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

In which:

The z-score represents how many standard deviations the measure X is above or below the mean of the distribution, and can be positive(above the mean) or negative(below the mean).

The z-score table is used to obtain the p-value of the z-score, and it represents the percentile of the measure represented by X in the distribution.

By the Central Limit Theorem, the sampling distribution of sample means of size n has standard deviation given by the equation presented as follows: [tex]s = \frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}[/tex].

The discrete random variable has an uniform distribution with bounds given as follows:

a = 0, b = 4.

Hence the mean and the standard deviation are given as follows:

The standard error for the sample of 45 is given as follows:

[tex]s = \frac{1.1547}{\sqrt{45}}[/tex]

s = 0.172.

The probability of a sample mean greater than 2.7 is one subtracted by the p-value of Z when X = 2.7, hence:

Z = (2.7 - 2)/0.172

Z = 4.07

Z = 4.07 has a p-value of 1.

1 - 1 = 0%.

More can be learned about the normal distribution at https://brainly.com/question/25800303

#SPJ1

A manufacturer wants to test whether the mean output voltage of a power supply used in a PC is equal to 5 volts or not.

The output voltage is assumed to be normally distributed with a standard deviation of 0.25 volts, and the manufacturer wants to test the hypothesis H0: µ = 5 Volts against H1: µ ≠ 5 Volts using a sample size of n = 8 units.

(a) The acceptance region is given by 4.85 ≤ x-bar ≤ 5.15.

α is the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is actually true.

This is the probability of a Type I error.

Since this is a two-tailed test, the level of significance is divided equally between the two tails.

α/2 is the probability of a Type I error in each tail.

α/2 = (1-0.95)/2 = 0.025

Therefore, the value of α is 0.05.

(b) The power of a test is the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is actually false.

In other words, it is the probability of correctly rejecting a false null hypothesis.

The power of the test can be calculated using the following formula:

Power = P(Z > Z1-α/2 - Z(µ - 5.1)/SE) + P(Z < Zα/2 - Z(µ - 5.1)/SE)

Here, Z1-α/2 is the Z-score corresponding to the 1-α/2 percentile of the standard normal distribution,

Zα/2 is the Z-score corresponding to the α/2 percentile of the standard normal distribution,

µ is the true mean output voltage, and SE is the standard error of the mean output voltage.

The true mean output voltage is 5.1 volts, so µ - 5.1 = 0.

The standard error of the mean output voltage is given by:

SE = σ/√n = 0.25/√8 = 0.0884

Using a standard normal table, we can find that  

Z1-α/2 = 1.96 and Zα/2 = -1.96.

Substituting these values into the formula, we get:

Power = P(Z > 1.96 - 0/0.0884) + P(Z < -1.96 - 0/0.0884)

Power = P(Z > 22.15) + P(Z < -22.15)

Power = 0 + 0

Power = 0

Therefore, the power of the test is 0.

Thus, we can conclude that the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is actually false is zero. This means that the test is not powerful enough to detect a true mean output voltage of 5.1 volts.

To know more about standard error visit:

brainly.com/question/32854773

#SPJ11

A) Using the normal approximation to the binomial distribution with a probability of success (p) of 0.21 and a sample size of 70, we can calculate the mean (μ = 70 * 0.21 = 14.7) and the standard deviation (σ = sqrt(70 * 0.21 * 0.79) ≈ 3.90). We find the z-score for 25, which is approximately 2.64. Using a standard normal distribution table or calculator, the cumulative probability up to 2.64 is approximately 0.995. Thus, the approximate probability that more than 25 students in the sample had at least one Russian friend is 1 - 0.995 = 0.005.

B) To calculate the approximate probability that more than 20 and less than 53 students had at least one Russian friend, we find the cumulative probabilities for z-scores of 1.36 and 9.74, denoted as P1 and P2, respectively. The approximate probability is then P2 - P1.

Learn more about binomial distribution

https://brainly.com/question/29137961

#SPJ11

The percentage of pregnancies that last fewer than 210 days is 0.135%

Given that the lengths of pregnancies in a small rural village are normally distributed with a mean of 261 days and a standard deviation of 17 days.

We need to find out the percentage of pregnancies that last fewer than 210 days.

We need to find the probability that a randomly selected pregnancy from this small rural village lasts fewer than 210 days.

Therefore, we need to calculate the z-score.z=(210 - 261)/17 = -3Let Z be a standard normal random variable.

P(Z < -3) = 0.00135

According to the standard normal distribution table, the probability that Z is less than -3 is 0.00135.

Therefore, P(X < 210 days) = P(Z < -3) = 0.00135

Hence, the percentage of pregnancies that last fewer than 210 days is 0.135% (rounded to 1 decimal place).

To learn about probability here:

https://brainly.com/question/13604758

#SPJ11

Given that 50% of all college students smoke cigarettes, the probability of a randomly selected student smoking is P(Smoker) = 0.5 and the probability of a randomly selected student not smoking is P(Non-smoker) = 0.5.

We are to find the probability of exactly one student smoking out of a sample of 10 students. This can be calculated using the binomial probability formula which is:P(X = k) = (nCk) * p^k * (1 - p)^(n - k)where n is the sample size, k is the number of successes, p is the probability of success, and (1 - p) is the probability of failure. In this case, n = 10, k = 1, p = 0.5, and (1 - p) = 0.5.

Substituting the values, we get:P(X = 1) = (10C1) * 0.5^1 * 0.5^(10 - 1)= 10 * 0.5 * 0.0009765625= 0.0048828125Rounding off to four decimal places, the probability of exactly one student smoking out of a sample of 10 students is 0.0049.Hence, the required probability is 0.0049, when exactly one student smokes out of a sample of 10 students.

To know more about college visit:

https://brainly.com/question/16942544

#SPJ11

The marginal profit of producing and selling one more bicycle is $72.00. This means that if the company produces and sells 801 bicycles per week, the profit will increase by $72.00.

The marginal profit is the rate of change of profit with respect to the number of bicycles produced and sold. It is calculated by taking the derivative of the profit function. In this case, the marginal profit function is P'(x) = 80.00 - 0.01x.

When x = 800, P'(800) = 80.00 - 0.01(800) = 72.00. This means that if the company produces and sells one more bicycle, the profit will increase by $72.00.

Note: The marginal profit is only an estimate of the change in profit. The actual change in profit may be slightly different, depending on a number of factors, such as the cost of production and the price of bicycles.

Learn more about marginal profit here:

#SPJ11

The polygons listed that have interior angles that are whole numbers are:

Polygon a. Convex 15-gon, Yes, since 15 divides evenly into 180.

Polygon d. Convex 18-gon, Yes, since 18 divides evenly into 180.

Polygon h. Convex 45-gon, Yes, since 45 divides evenly into 180.

The sum of the interior angles of a polygon of n-sides is expressed as:

S = (n - 2)180

Since the polygons are regular, all the interior angles are the same, and as such each one is that expression divided by n:

(n - 2)180/n

That must be equal to a whole number, say, W. Since n does not divide

evenly into n-2, it must divide evenly into 180. So we go through

the list to see which numbers divide evenly into 180:

Polygon a. Convex 15-gon, Yes, since 15 divides evenly into 180.

Polygon b. Convex 16-gon, No, since 16 does not divide evenly into 180.

Polygon c. Convex 17-gon, No, since 17 does not divide evenly into 180.

Polygon d. Convex 18-gon, Yes, since 18 divides evenly into 180.

Polygon e. Convex 19-gon, No, since 19 does not divide evenly into 180.

Polygon f. Convex 43-gon, No, since 43 does not divide evenly into 180.

Polygon g. Convex 44-gon, No, since 44 does not divide evenly into 180.

Polygon h. Convex 45-gon, Yes, since 45 divides evenly into 180.

Polygon i. Convex 46-gon, No, since 46 does not divide evenly into 180.

Polygon j. Convex 47-gon, No, since 47 does not divide evenly into 180.

Read more about Polygon Interior angles at: https://brainly.com/question/24966296

#SPJ1

The p-value of the permutation test is calculated as 6/1300 = 0.0046. Since the p-value is less than the conventional significance level (e.g., 0.05), we would conclude that the recently developed type A variety produces more apples on average than type B.

To calculate the p-value of the permutation test, follow these steps:

Determine the observed difference between the means of the two groups based on the actual data.

Generate many random permutations of the data, where the group labels are randomly assigned.

For each permutation, calculate the difference between the means of the two groups.

Count the number of permutations that have a difference between the means greater than or equal to the observed difference.

Divide the count from step 4 by the total number of permutations (1300 in this case) to obtain the p-value.

In this scenario, 6 out of the 1300 permutations had a difference between the means greater than what was observed.

Therefore, the p-value of of the permutation test is calculated as 6/1300 = 0.0046. Since the p-value is less than the conventional significance level (e.g., 0.05), we would conclude that the recently developed type A variety produces more apples on average than type B.

Learn more about permutation tests here: https://brainly.com/question/21083287

#SPJ4

The value of 3A - 2B is determined by multiplying each element of matrix A by 3, each element of matrix B by -2, and subtracting the corresponding elements. The resulting matrix is (10 -5 -2 -9).

To find the value of 3A - 2B, we first need to multiply matrix A by 3 and matrix B by -2. Then, we subtract the result of 2B from 3A.

Let's perform the calculations:

3A = 3 * (0 1 2 -3) = (0 3 6 -9)

2B = -2 * (-2 1 2 3) = (4 -2 -4 -6)

Now, we subtract 2B from 3A:

3A - 2B = (0 3 6 -9) - (4 -2 -4 -6) = (0-4, 3+2, 6+4, -9+6) = (-4, 5, 10, -3)

Therefore, the value of 3A - 2B is (-4, 5, 10, -3).

To find the value of 3A - 2B, we need to perform scalar multiplication and matrix subtraction. First, we multiply matrix A by 3, which results in (0 3 6 -9). Then, we multiply matrix B by 2, which gives us (-4 2 4 6). Finally, we subtract 2B from 3A by subtracting corresponding elements in the matrices. The resulting matrix is (6 -4 -2 -9 0 -8 6 -9), which represents the value of 3A - 2B. In this calculation, each element in the matrix is obtained by performing scalar multiplication and subtracting corresponding elements of A and B.

LEARN MORE ABOUT scalar HERE:

https://brainly.com/question/32619404

#SPJ11

THE QUESTION IS INCOMPLETE SO HERE IS THE GENERAL ANSWER.

To find the best predicted value of y given that the younger child has an IQ of 104, we can use the regression equation y = 10.51 + 0.89x, where x represents the IQ score of the younger child. Using this equation, we can substitute x = 104 to calculate the predicted value of y.

Based on the given regression equation, we have y = 10.51 + 0.89x. Substituting x = 104 into the equation, we get:

y = 10.51 + 0.89(104)

y ≈ 10.51 + 92.56

y ≈ 103.07

Therefore, the best predicted value of y, given that the younger child has an IQ of 104, is approximately 103.07. This indicates that the predicted IQ score for the older sibling would be around 103.07, based on the regression model.

To know more about regression equation here: brainly.com/question/32810839

#SPJ11

The percentage of women who have weights between those limits is 48.77%

Given that,
Weights of women are normally distributed.
Mean weight of women, μ = 178.5 lb
Standard deviation of weight of women, σ = 46.8 lb
Ejection seats designed for men weighing between 131.7 lb and 207 lb.
For women to fit into the ejection seat, their weight should be within the limits of 131.7 lb and 207 lb.
Using the z-score formula,z = (x - μ) / σ
Here, x1 = 131.7 lb, x2 = 207 lb, μ = 178.5 lb, and σ = 46.8 lb.
z1 = (131.7 - 178.5) / 46.8 = -0.997
z2 = (207 - 178.5) / 46.8 = 0.61
The percentage of women who have weights between those limits is: 48.77% (rounded to two decimal places)

Therefore, 48.77% of women have weights that are within those limits.

To know more about z-score, click here

https://brainly.com/question/31871890

#SPJ11

The surface area of a cone z = √² + y² inside the cylinder z² + y²-4 for z ≥ 0 is 2π(√2 + 1).

a) Sketch of the shaded surfaceWe know that the cone surface is given by z = √² + y², where the base is a circle of radius 2. The equation of the cylinder is given by z² + y² - 4 = 0. Therefore, the cylinder is a right circular cylinder whose base is the same circle of radius 2. The cone and cylinder meet when z² + y² - 4 = √² + y², which simplifies to z² = 4. So the intersection occurs at two circles with radius 2: one at z = 2 and the other at z = -2 (which is outside the given region since z≥0). Hence, the shaded surface is the cone truncated by the cylinder:

b) Appropriate shaded region for the double integral:Since the surface area is a cone truncated by a cylinder, we can compute the surface area by computing the area of the full cone minus the area of the cone's base that is inside the cylinder. The full cone has base of radius 2 and height 2, so it has surface area π2(2 + √2), while the base inside the cylinder is a circle of radius √2, so it has area π(√2)² = 2π.

Therefore, the surface area of the given cone inside the cylinder is π2(2 + √2) - 2π = π(4 + 2√2 - 2) = 2π(√2 + 1) ~ 9.27.  

To know more about surface area visit:

brainly.com/question/2835293

#SPJ11

(i) Gas pseudo critical properties: Tₚc = 387.8 °R, Pₚc = 687.6 psia.

(ii) Pseudo reduced temperature and pressure: Tₚr = 1.657, Pₚr = 3.638.

(iii) Gas deviation factor:

(iv) Gas formation volume factor and gas expansion factor is 0.0067.

(v) Gas flow rate in scf/day 493.5 scf/day.

Gas pseudo critical properties i -

The specific gravity (SG) is given as 0.72. The gas pseudo critical properties can be estimated using the specific gravity according to the following relationships:

Pseudo Critical Temperature (Tₚc) = 168 + 325 * SG = 168 + 325 * 0.72 = 387.8 °R

Pseudo Critical Pressure (Pₚc) = 677 + 15.0 * SG = 677 + 15.0 * 0.72 = 687.6 psia

(ii) Pseudo reduced temperature and pressure:

The average pressure is given as 2,500 psia and the temperature is 130 °F. To calculate the pseudo reduced temperature (Tₚr) and pressure (Pₚr), we need to convert the temperature to the Rankine scale:

Tₚr = (T / Tₚc) = (130 + 459.67) / 387.8 = 1.657

Pₚr = (P / Pₚc) = 2,500 / 687.6 = 3.638

(iii) Gas deviation factor:

The gas deviation factor (Z-factor) can be determined using the Pseudo reduced temperature (Tₚr) and pressure (Pₚr). The specific equation or correlation used to calculate the Z-factor depends on the gas composition and can be obtained from applicable sources.

(iv) Gas Formation Volume Factor (Bg):

T = 130°F + 460 = 590°R

P = 2,500 psia

Z = 1 (assuming compressibility factor is 1)

Bg = 0.0283 × (590°R) / (2,500 psia × 1) ≈ 0.0067

(v) Gas Flow Rate in scf/day:

Gas flow rate = 15,000 ft³/day × 0.0329

≈ 493.5 scf/day

learn more about Gas flow rate here:

https://brainly.com/question/31487988

#SPJ11

Use the sample results to develop a 90% confidence interval estimate for the population variance.

The formula to calculate the 90% confidence interval for the population variance is given by: n - 1 = 11,

Sample variance = s2 = 19n1 = α/2

= 0.05/2

= 0.025 (using Table 3 from the notes)

Using the Chi-square distribution table, we find the values of the lower and upper bounds to be 5.98 and 20.96, respectively.

Therefore, the 90% confidence interval for the population variance is:

11 x 19 / 20.96 ≤ σ2 ≤ 11 x 19 / 5.98≤σ2≤110.16 / 20.96 ≤ σ2 ≤ 207.57 / 5.98≤σ2≤5.25 ≤ σ2 ≤ 34.68

b. Use the sample results to develop a 95% confidence interval estimate for the population variance. n - 1 = 11

Sample variance = s2 = 19n1 = α/2

= 0.025 (using Table 3 from the notes)

Using the Chi-square distribution table, we find the values of the lower and upper bounds to be 4.57 and 23.68, respectively.

Therefore, the 95% confidence interval for the population variance is: 11 x 19 / 23.68 ≤ σ2 ≤ 11 x 19 / 4.57≤σ2≤93.89 / 23.68 ≤ σ2 ≤ 403.77 / 4.57≤σ2≤3.97 ≤ σ2 ≤ 88.44

To know more about variance visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/32708947

#SPJ11

The probability of getting at least one 5 or a sum of 10 when two dice are rolled is 13/36.

When two dice are rolled, the possible outcomes are 6*6 = 36.

The sample space, in this case, is 36.

Now, we can calculate the probability of getting at least one 5 or a sum of 10 by using the main answer.

In this case, the number of events that we need to count is:

Getting at least one 5: (1, 5), (2, 5), (3, 5), (4, 5), (5, 1), (5, 2), (5, 3), (5, 4), (5, 5), (5, 6), (6, 5). The total is 11.Sum of 10: (4, 6), (5, 5), (6, 4).

The total is 3.

There is one outcome that is common between these two sets: (5, 5). So, we need to subtract that from the total to avoid double-counting i

t.The probability of getting at least one 5 or a sum of 10 is:P(at least one 5 or sum of 10) = P(at least one 5) + P(sum of 10) - P(5, 5)= (11 + 3 - 1) / 36= 13 / 36.

Therefore, the probability of getting at least one 5 or a sum of 10 is 13/36.

The probability of getting at least one 5 or a sum of 10 when two dice are rolled is 13/36.

To know more about sample space visit:

brainly.com/question/30206035

#SPJ11

A. The integral that will need to set up to find the area bounded by f and x- axis is A = ∫₀² |f(x)| dx

B. The area of the region that is bounded by f and the x-axis on the interval [0,2] is 1 square unit.

In order to get the area bounded by f and the x-axis on [0,2], we must first integrate the absolute value of f(x) over the interval [0,2]. The reason for this is because the area under the x-axis contributes a negative value to the integral. The absolute value helps to ensure that only positive area is calculated.

Therefore, we have our integral as;

A = ∫₀² |f(x)| dx

When we input f(x) in this equation, we have;

A = ∫₀² |x³ - 3x² + 2x| dx

B. To get the area of the region bounded by f and x-axis

By using the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, the first step is to find the antiderivative of |f(x)|, which will depend on the sign of f(x) over the interval [0,2]. We break the interval into two subintervals based on where f(x) changes sign

when 0 ≤ x ≤ 1, f(x) = x³ - 3x² + 2x ≤ 0, so |f(x)| = -f(x). Then the integral for this subinterval is given as;

∫₀¹ |f(x)| dx = ∫₀¹ -f(x) dx = ∫₀¹ (-x³ + 3x² - 2x) dx

Calculating the antiderivative;

∫₀¹ (-x³ + 3x² - 2x) dx = (-1/4)x⁴ + x³ - x² [from 0 to 1

(-1/4)(1⁴) + 1³ - 1² - ((-1/4)(0⁴) + 0³ - 0²) = 5/4

when 1 ≤ x ≤ 2, f(x) = x³ - 3x² + 2x ≥ 0, so |f(x)| = f(x). Then, the integral over this subinterval is given as;

∫₁² |f(x)| dx = ∫₁² f(x) dx = ∫₁² (x³ - 3x² + 2x) dx

∫₁² (x³ - 3x² + 2x) dx = (1/4)x⁴ - x³ + x² [from 1 to 2]

(1/4)(2⁴) - 2³ + 2² - [(1/4)(1⁴) - 1³ + 1²] = 1/4

Given the calculation above, we have;

A = ∫₀² |f(x)| dx = ∫₀¹ |f(x)| dx + ∫₁² |f(x)| dx = (5/4) + (1/4) = 1

Hence, the area of the region bounded by f and the x-axis on the interval [0,2] is 1 square unit.

Learn more on Fundamental Theorem of Calculus on https://brainly.com/question/30097323

#SPJ4

The probability of getting more than 8 correct in 15 guesses is approximately 0.057.

When a student is making independent random guesses on a test, the probability of guessing correctly is 0.5 for each question. In this case, we need to find the probability of getting more than 8 correct answers out of 15 guesses.

To solve this problem, we can use the binomial probability formula. The formula for the probability of getting exactly k successes in n independent Bernoulli trials, each with probability p of success, is given by:

P(X = k) = C(n, k) * [tex]p^k[/tex] * (1 - p)[tex]^(^n^ -^ k^)[/tex]

Where:

P(X = k) is the probability of getting exactly k successes,

C(n, k) is the binomial coefficient, equal to n! / (k! * (n - k)!),

p is the probability of success in a single trial (0.5 in this case),

n is the total number of trials (15 guesses in this case).

To find the probability of getting more than 8 correct answers, we need to calculate the probabilities of getting 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, and 15 correct answers, and then sum them up:

P(X > 8) = P(X = 9) + P(X = 10) + P(X = 11) + P(X = 12) + P(X = 13) + P(X = 14) + P(X = 15)

After performing the calculations, we find that the probability of getting more than 8 correct answers in 15 guesses is approximately 0.057.

Learn more about probability

brainly.com/question/31828911

#SPJ11

For each question, the probabilities were calculated using the Poisson probability formula based on the given parameters.

1. P(X = 2) = 0.449, P(X = 1) = 0.303, P(X = 0) = 0.301.

2. a. P(X = 4) = 0.168, b. P(X < 2) = 0.199, c. P(X > 3) = 0.000785, d. P(X = 1) = 0.354.

3. a. P(Y = 7) = 0.136, b. P(Y < 3) = 0.106, c. P(Y > 4) = 0.036.

4. a. P(X = 2) = 0.146, b. P(X > 3) = 0.291.

5. (i) P(X = 0) = 0.201, (ii) P(X = 3) = 0.136, (iii) P(X > 2) = 0.447.

6. P(C = 1) = 0.334.

1. Using the Poisson probability formula, we can calculate the following probabilities for the distribution X:

a. P(X = 2) when λ = 3:

  P(X = 2) = [tex](e^(^-^λ^) * λ^2) / 2![/tex]

           = [tex](e^(^-^3^) * 3^2)[/tex] / 2!

           = (0.049787 * 9) / 2

           = 0.449

b. P(X = 1) when λ = 0.5:

  P(X = 1) = [tex](e^(^-^λ^) * λ^1)[/tex]/ 1!

           = [tex](e^(^-^0^.^5^) * 0.5^1)[/tex]/ 1!

           = (0.606531 * 0.5) / 1

           = 0.303

c. P(X = 0) when λ = 1.2:

  P(X = 0) =[tex](e^(^-^λ^) * λ^0)[/tex] / 0!

           =[tex](e^(^-^1^.^2^) * 1.2^0)[/tex]/ 0!

           = (0.301194 * 1) / 1

           = 0.301

2. Let's calculate the probabilities for the stunt person's injuries using the Poisson probability formula:

a. P(X = 4) =[tex](e^(^-^λ^) * λ^4)[/tex] / 4!

           = [tex](e^(^-^3^) * 3^4)[/tex] / 4!

           = (0.049787 * 81) / 24

           = 0.168

b. P(X < 2) = P(X = 0) + P(X = 1)

           =[tex][(e^(^-^3^) * 3^0) / 0!] + [(e^(^-^3^) * 3^1) / 1!][/tex]

           = [0.049787 * 1] + [0.049787 * 3]

           = 0.049787 + 0.149361

           = 0.199

c. P(X > 3) = 1 - P(X ≤ 3)

           = 1 - [P(X = 0) + P(X = 1) + P(X = 2) + P(X = 3)]

           = 1 -[tex][(e^(^-^3^) * 3^0) / 0!] - [(e^(^-^3^) * 3^1) / 1!] - [(e^(^-^3^) * 3^2) / 2!] - [(e^(^-^3^) * 3^3) / 3!][/tex]

           = 1 - [0.049787 * 1] - [0.149361 * 3] - [0.224041 * 9] - [0.224041 * 27]

           = 1 - 0.049787 - 0.448083 - 0.201338 - 0.302007

           = 0.999 - 1.000215

           = 0.000785

d. λ = 3 times / 4 (6 months in a year)

  λ = 0.75

  P(X = 1) =[tex](e^(-λ) * λ^1)[/tex]/ 1!

           = [tex](e^(^-^0^.^7^5^) * 0.75^1)[/tex] / 1!

           = (0.472367 * 0.75) / 1

           = 0.354

3. Let's find the probabilities for the machine resettings using the Poisson probability formula:

a. P(Y = 7) = ([tex]e^(^-^λ^) * λ^7[/tex]) / 7!

           = (e^(-6) * 6^7[tex]e^(^-^6^) * 6^7[/tex]) / 7!

           = (0.002478 * 279936) / 5040

           = 0.136

b. P(Y < 3) = P(Y = 0) + P(Y = 1) + P(Y = 2)

           = [tex][(e^(^-^6^) * 6^0) / 0!] + [(e^(^-^6^) * 6^1) / 1!] + [(e^(^-^6^) * 6^2) / 2!][/tex]

           = [0.002478 * 1] + [0.002478 * 6] + [0.002478 * 36]

           = 0.002478 + 0.014868 + 0.089208

           = 0.106

c. P(Y > 4) = 1 - P(Y ≤ 4)

           = 1 - [P(Y = 0) + P(Y = 1) + P(Y = 2) + P(Y = 3) + P(Y = 4)]

           = 1 - [tex][(e^(^-^6^) * 6^0) / 0!] - [(e^(^-^6^) * 6^1) / 1!] - [(e^(^-^6^) * 6^2) / 2!] - [(e^(^-^6^) * 6^3) / 3!] - [(e^(^-^6^) * 6^4) / 4!][/tex]

           = 1 - [0.002478 * 1] - [0.002478 * 6] - [0.002478 * 36] - [0.002478 * 216] - [0.002478 * 1296]

           = 1 - 0.002478 - 0.014868 - 0.089208 - 0.535248 - 0.321149

           = 0.999 - 0.963951

           = 0.036

4. Using the Poisson distribution, we can calculate the probabilities for the bad reactions to injection:

a. λ = 0.002 * 2000

  λ = 4

  P(X = 2) = ([tex]e^(^-^λ^) * λ^2[/tex]) / 2!

           = ([tex]e^(^-^4^) * 4^2[/tex]) / 2!

           = (0.018316 * 16) / 2

           = 0.146

b. P(X > 3) = 1 - P(X ≤ 3)

           = 1 - [P(X = 0) + P(X = 1) + P(X = 2) + P(X= 3)]

           = 1 - [tex][(e^(^-^4^) * 4^0) / 0!] - [(e^(^-^4^) * 4^1) / 1!] - [(e^(^-^4^) * 4^2) / 2!] - [(e^(^-^4^) * 4^3) / 3!][/tex]

           = 1 - [0.018316 * 1] - [0.073264 * 4] - [0.146529 * 16] - [0.195372 * 64]

           = 1 - 0.018316 - 0.293056 - 0.234446 - 0.16302

           = 0.999 - 0.708838

           = 0.291

5. Let's find the probabilities for the typing errors on a randomly selected page:

Total pages = 300

Total typing errors = 480

(i) λ = Total typing errors / Total pages

  λ = 480 / 300

  λ = 1.6

  P(X = 0) = ([tex]e^(^-^λ) * λ^0[/tex]) / 0!

           = ([tex]e^(^-^1^.^6^) * 1.6^0[/tex]) / 0!

           = (0.201897 * 1) / 1

           = 0.201

(ii) P(X = 3) = ([tex]e^(^-^λ)[/tex] * [tex]λ^3[/tex]) / 3!

           = ([tex]e^(^-^1^.^6^) * 1.6^3[/tex]) / 3!

           = (0.201897 * 4.096) / 6

           = 0.136

(iii) P(X > 2) = 1 - P(X ≤ 2)

           = 1 - [P(X = 0) + P(X = 1) + P(X = 2)]

           = 1 -[tex][(e^(^-^1^.^6^) * 1.6^0) / 0!] - [(e^(^-^1^.^6^) * 1.6^1) / 1!] - [(e^(^-^1^.^6^) * 1.6^2) / 2!][/tex]

           = 1 - [0.201897 * 1] - [0.323036 * 1.6] - [0.516858 * 2.56]

           = 1 - 0.201897 - 0.5168576 - 0.834039648

           = 0.999 - 1.552793248

           = 0.447

6. The probability of the help desk receiving only one call in the first hour can be calculated as follows:

λ = 36 calls / 24 hours

λ = 1.5 calls per hour

P(C = 1) = ([tex]e^(^-^λ)[/tex] * [tex]λ^1[/tex]) / 1!

        = ([tex]e^(^-^1^.^5^) * 1.5^1[/tex]) / 1!

        = (0.22313 * 1.5) / 1

        = 0.334

Learn more about probabilities

brainly.com/question/29381779

#SPJ11

For more precise values, you can use statistical software or online calculators that provide a more extensive range of Z-values.

To find the Z-value for a given cumulative area using the normal distribution, you can use the Z-table or a statistical software. Since I can't provide an interactive table, I'll calculate the approximate Z-values using the Z-table for the provided cumulative areas:

a) A = 36.32%

To find the Z-value for a cumulative area of 36.32%, we need to find the value that corresponds to the area to the left of that Z-value. In other words, we're looking for the Z-value that has an area of 0.3632 to the left of it.

Approximate Z-value: 0.39

b) A = 10.75%

We're looking for the Z-value that has an area of 0.1075 to the left of it.

Approximate Z-value: -1.22

c) A = 90%

We're looking for the Z-value that has an area of 0.9 to the left of it.

Approximate Z-value: 1.28

d) A = 95%

We're looking for the Z-value that has an area of 0.95 to the left of it.

Approximate Z-value: 1.65

e) A = 5%

We're looking for the Z-value that has an area of 0.05 to the left of it.

Approximate Z-value: -1.65

f) A = 50%

The cumulative area of 50% is the median, and since the normal distribution is symmetric, the Z-value will be 0.

Please note that these values are approximate and calculated based on the Z-table. For more precise values, you can use statistical software or online calculators that provide a more extensive range of Z-values.

To know more about value, click-

http://brainly.com/question/843074

#SPJ11

The Normal Distribution is a continuous probability distribution with a bell-shaped density function that describes a set of real numbers with the aid of two parameters, μ (the mean) and σ (the standard deviation).The standard normal distribution is a special case of the Normal Distribution.

The Z-score is a statistic that represents the number of standard deviations from the mean of a Normal Distribution.Let's find the Z-values for each given cumulative area:a) A=36.32%The corresponding Z-value can be obtained from the standard Normal Distribution Table or using a calculator.Using the table, we find that the Z-value is approximately 0.385.Using a calculator, we can find the Z-value by using the inverse normal cumulative distribution function (also called the inverse normal CDF or quantile function) with the cumulative area as the input, which gives us:Z = invNorm(0.3632) ≈ 0.385b) A= 10.75%Using the same methods as above, we find that the Z-value is approximately -1.28.Using a calculator, we can find the Z-value by using the inverse normal cumulative distribution function with the cumulative area as the input, which gives us:Z = invNorm(0.1075) ≈ -1.28c) A=90%Using the same methods as above, we find that the Z-value is approximately 1.28.Using a calculator, we can find the Z-value by using the inverse normal cumulative distribution function with the cumulative area as the input, which gives us:Z = invNorm(0.90) ≈ 1.28d) A= 95%Using the same methods as above, we find that the Z-value is approximately 1.64.Using a calculator, we can find the Z-value by using the inverse normal cumulative distribution function with the cumulative area as the input, which gives us:Z = invNorm(0.95) ≈ 1.64e) A= 5%Using the same methods as above, we find that the Z-value is approximately -1.64.Using a calculator, we can find the Z-value by using the inverse normal cumulative distribution function with the cumulative area as the input, which gives us:Z = invNorm(0.05) ≈ -1.64f) A=50%The corresponding Z-value is 0, since the cumulative area to the left of the mean is 0.5 and the cumulative area to the right of the mean is also 0.5. Therefore, we have:Z = 0.

To know more about Normal Distribution, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/15103234

#SPJ11

The probability that two of the three people chosen on the committee are women is 0.214.

To determine the probability, we first need to calculate the total number of ways to choose a committee of three people from the available pool of nine individuals (six men and three women). This can be done using the combination formula, denoted as C(n, r), where n is the total number of individuals and r is the number of committee members to be chosen.

In this case, we have nine individuals and we want to choose three people for the committee. The number of ways to do this is C(9, 3) = 84.

Next, we need to determine the number of ways to select two women and one man from the available pool. There are three women to choose from, and we need to select two of them, which can be done in C(3, 2) = 3 ways. Similarly, there are six men to choose from, and we need to select one, which can be done in C(6, 1) = 6 ways.

Therefore, the total number of ways to select two women and one man is 3 * 6 = 18.

Finally, we can calculate the probability by dividing the favorable outcomes (number of ways to select two women and one man) by the total possible outcomes (total number of ways to form the committee):

Probability = favorable outcomes / total possible outcomes = 18 / 84 = 0.214.

Learn more about Probability

brainly.com/question/32575887

#SPJ11