Answer: D. right to establish a local government
Congress has created many courts under article iii section i. Currently, the federal court system is composed of _____ district courts.
Congress has created many courts under article iii section i. Currently, the federal court system is composed of 94 district-level trial courts district courts.
The district courts are the overall trial courts of the federal court docket gadget. every district court has at least one u.s.a. District judge, appointed through the President and shown by using the Senate for a lifetime period. District courts cope with trials in the federal court machine – both civil and crook.
Us district courts are the trial courts of the federal courtroom machine. within limits set by means of Congress and the charter, the district courts have jurisdiction to pay attention to almost all categories of federal cases, which include each civil and criminal matter.
District courts have unique jurisdiction, which means that they preside over instances first. those instances may be both criminal or civil instances. crook: cases in which you ruin a federal law and get arrested are heard in a federal district court docket.
Learn more about District courts here:
https://brainly.com/question/1302046
#SPJ4
What are some steps government might take to improve public attitudes about election campaigns?
Some of the steps that government might take to improve public attitudes about election campaigns are:
using media to educate people about importance of voting.maintain a free and fair election processWhat is election campaign?The election campaign can be described as the public awareness about the election process which can be described as the act of convincing people so that they can come out to exercise their right and vote for the candidate that best suite them and that can represent them in the government.
It should be noted that government can encourage people by maintaining a free and fair election process in the country.
Learn more about election at:
https://brainly.com/question/28222478
#SPJ1
Which case saw the supreme court develop a three-part test to legally define obscenity, or indecent or offensive speech?.
The supreme court develops a 3-element test to legally outline obscenity, or indecent or offensive speech: Miller v. California.
The supreme court docket of the USA is the highest courtroom in the federal judiciary of the USA. It has final appellate jurisdiction over all U.S. federal court cases and over country courtroom cases that involve a point of federal regulation. very best courtroom. (within the US) the highest Federal court docket, owning the very last appellate jurisdiction and workout supervisory jurisdiction over the decreased courts. (in many states) the highest country court docket.
Although the excellent court docket may additionally pay attention to an appeal on any query of law furnished it has jurisdiction, it generally no longer maintains trials. alternatively, the court docket's project is to interpret the meaning of a regulation, to determine whether or not a law is relevant to a specific set of information, or to rule on how a regulation ought to be implemented.
Learn more about supreme court here:
https://brainly.com/question/18228641
#SPJ4
In exercise 14, who may be present during the trial? If there is an appeal, which of these parties will not have to appear again?
The party filling the appeal is the appellant. The party opposing the appeal is the appellee.
In a civil case, both can also additionally enchantment to a better courtroom docket. In a crook case, best the defendant has a proper to an enchantment in maximum states. Some states deliver the prosecution a restricted proper to enchantment to decide positive factors of law. These appeals commonly arise earlier than the real trial begins.
The term petitioner is used for a litigant who documents an enchantment from an administrative organization or who appeals a unique proceeding. The appellant (petitioner) bears the load of displaying that the trial court room docket or administrative organization made a felony mistake that affected the district court room docket's decision.
Learn more about appeal here:
https://brainly.com/question/25915978
#SPJ1
Which court have the ability to hear cases involving both civil and criminal law?
The Superior Court of Justice has the ability to hear cases involving both civil and criminal law.
What is law?Law and be defined as a system of rules and regulations that the individual must obey at all times. Different countries or nations have different laws, as stated by the state or court. If a person violates the law or breaks one of them, he is considered an offender and is punished accordingly.
The Superior Court of Justice has the authority to consider both civil and felony proceedings. A judiciary seems to be a legal person that was established to assist the state run efficiently.
It is normally designed to ensure that the person who has been appointed and everyone who is punishable for a crime has a fair chance of being tried and punished for the crime committed.
Learn more about law, here:
https://brainly.com/question/6534668
#SPJ12
what are the six type of primary election and its uses.
A third party that wins elections is part of Nigeria's multi-party system, which includes two or three other successful parties.
Briefing:-However, until 2015, when Muhammadu Buhari was elected president, PDP members had been in charge of the White House since voting had begun in 1999.
What kinds of elections are held in Ghana?Since 1992, elections have been conducted every four years. Every four years on December 7, there are concurrent presidential and legislative elections.
What three different voting systems are there?An expert survey on election systems was conducted in 2006, and the following electoral systems were the experts' top choices: Appropriate for mixed members. one vote that may be transferred. proportional open list
To Know more about electoral systems
https://brainly.com/question/20297176
#SPJ13
Are the freedoms given up worth the national security gains?
The national security protective actions taken over 20 years have produced important gains in security at home—but these gains came with major human, and financial.
What freedoms were given up worth the national security gains?It protects us by maintaining effective arm forces, using counterintelligence services or secret police to protect the nation from internal threats, and implementing civil defense and emergency National security preparedness measures. It is in fact effective because as we are meeting. I can say that it helps our country's safety. Any warning challenges a nation's power and deranges its well-being. The field of national security safeguards the cast of such threats. National security protects not only citizens but also the economic stability of national institutions. It shows that the policy is designed to advance demands which are attributed to the nation rather than to personal, sub-national groups
So we can conclude that to protect the national security of the American people; to expand economic prosperity and opportunity.
Learn more about it National security here: https://brainly.com/question/1083892
#SPJ1
in a criminal court case the burden of proof to find a defendant guilty is "beyond a reasonable doubt," whereas in a civil court case the burden of proof is .
A criminal is one of a kind. A higher burden is required in a criminal lawsuit than in a civil in shape. In a criminal case, the prosecutor has the burden of proof past a reasonable doubt. The burden of proof in a civil case is a preponderance of the evidence.
The weight of proof is a party's responsibility to show a charge, allegation, or protection. the weight of manufacturing is the responsibility to provide evidence to the trier of fact. a load of persuasion is the responsibility to persuade the trier of truth to a positive general, which includes a preponderance of proof or past an inexpensive doubt.
In a criminal case, the prosecution bears the load of proving that the defendant is guilty beyond all reasonable doubt. which means that the prosecution needs to persuade the jury that there is no other affordable clarification that could come from the evidence supplied at trial.
Evidence beyond an affordable doubt: this is the main burden of proof in criminal cases. To convict you of a criminal offense, a prosecutor should prove your guilt past an inexpensive doubt. In this burden approach, the prosecution ought to show there's no other reasonable reason for the proof it presents at trial.
Learn more about criminal cases here:
https://brainly.com/question/199340
#SPJ4
Congress has created many courts under article iii section i. Currently, the federal court system is composed of _____ courts of appeals.
Congress has created many courts under article iii section i. Currently, the federal court system is composed of Congress also has created 13 courts of appeals and 94 district courts.
American district courts are the trial courts of the U.S. federal judiciary. there may be one district courtroom for each federal judicial district, which every cowl one U.S. state or, in a few instances, a portion of a state. each district courtroom has at least one courthouse, and plenty of districts have a couple. Federal courts enjoy the sole energy to interpret the regulation, determine the constitutionality of the regulation, and use it in individual instances. The courts, like Congress, can compel the production of evidence and testimony via the usage of a subpoena.
The Federal courtroom of Malaysia (Malay: Mahkamah Persekutuan Malaysia) is the highest courtroom and the final appellate courtroom in Malaysia. it's far housed inside the Palace of Justice in Putrajaya. The court turned into installed throughout Malaya's independence in 1957 and acquired its contemporary call in 1994.
Learn more about Federal courts here:
https://brainly.com/question/26449558
#SPJ4
the german and french theft codes: a. show that civil law countries believe that codes provide specific solutions to particular problems. b. supply general principles from which logical deduction provides a resolution in each case. c. are limited in scope due to restrictions on how much can be written for any one offense. d. exemplify the high degree of specificity typically found in procedural law from civil legal tradition countries.
The german and french theft codes deliver popular concepts from which logical deduction provides a resolution in every case.
Choice B
Supply fashionable concepts from which logical deduction affords a resolution in each case.
While we refer to logical deduction procedures and policies, we are relating to a: prison machine. The three main subtraditions forming the not-unusual criminal way of life are custom, feudal practices, and fairness.
Deductive reasoning, additionally deductive good judgment, is the method of reasoning from one or greater statements (premises) to reach a logical conclusion. The logical deduction is going in the identical route as that of the conditionals and hyperlinks premises with conclusions.
Learn more about logical deduction here
https://brainly.com/question/1803030
#SPJ4
if the misrepresentation is discovered, the contract can be declared void. depending on the situation, the adversely impacted party may seek damages. in this type of contract dispute, the party that is accused of making the misrepresentation is the defendant, and the party making the claim is the plaintiff."
This is true about what would happen in the case that a misrepresentation has occurred.
What is a misrepresentation?This is the term that is used to refer to the false statement that is made when a contract is being drawn that has the capability of trying to affect the decision that the other party would have to make as the contract is being drawn.
The way that this is known to happen is that there is a breach that would have to happen due to this act. Hence this is known to cause situations that would lead to a contract breach hence it would be seen to be void.
The case of misrepresentation is therefore on that has to be seen as the breach of contract that would lead to a void being put in a contract which has the power to make the affetcted person to go to the court ib order to seek for a redress.
Read more on a misrepresentation here:
https://brainly.com/question/5792449
#SPJ1
question
if the misrepresentation is discovered, the contract can be declared void. depending on the situation, the adversely impacted party may seek damages. in this type of contract dispute, the party that is accused of making the misrepresentation is the defendant, and the party making the claim is the plaintiff."
True or false
Fingerprint evidence is recovered from a breaking and entering crime scene. Is this class or individual evidence? Explain.
Answer:
Individual Evidence
Explanation:
The following is individual evidence because two people cannot have the same print.
What factors are used to judge if consideration is adequate to ensure a fair bargain? choose 2 answers.
The factors are used to judge if consideration is adequate to ensure a fair bargain are:
Items or promises exchanged must be of nearly equal value.Promises must be made with voluntary consent.What is fair bargain ?Fair bargain can be described as the kind of bargain which involves the actor been voluntarily carry out an act.
According to the benefit-detriment theory, , the process must be fair enough between those that made the promise and the one that the promise was made to.
Therefore, option B and D are correct because in the fair bargain, there should be a case whereby voluntary consent must be reached.
Learn more about bargain at:
https://brainly.com/question/13538163
#SPJ1
Check the complete question:
a)Promises exchanged may not be a preexisting duty.
b)Items or promises exchanged must be of nearly equal value.
c)Consideration must be a promise to pay money.
d)Promises must be made with voluntary consent.
Jane Johnson found classified information in the office breakroom. What should be her first action?
Identify a contact name, reach out, and return the information
O
Contact the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
O
Contact her security manager or facility security officer (FSO)
SMure the information in a GSA-approved security container
Based on the fact that Jane Johnson found some information that was classified, in the office break room, her first action should be to Secure the information in a GSA-approved security container.
How should classified information be handled?When we come across classified information like Jane Johnson did, the first thing to be done is to secure this information. The reason for this is to ensure that the information does not fall into the wrong hands that might try to take advantage of the classified nature of the information.
The way to do this is to put the information into a United States General Services Administration approved security container. These containers are made according to federal standards and specifications on security and so would best protect the information.
After this step, the next step would be to contact the legal department in the company. By contacting the legal department, Jane Johnson can then be told what to do next according to company polices.
Find out more on classified information at https://brainly.com/question/28222192
#SPJ1
What is the name of the defense for a product defect negligence case whereby the consumer is aware of the defect before the accident and continues to use the product?.
Strict Liability the name of the defense for a product defect negligence case whereby the consumer is aware of the defect before the accident and continues to use the product.
Negligence is greater hard to prove than certainly that a disorder exists because it indicates that the accountable celebration did not uphold a suitable popular of care. It does now not mean that the layout or manufacture of a product changed into faulty, however that the producer knowingly took dangers that might placed others in risk.can also 10, 2021
Negligence claims beneath product legal responsibility law include design mistakes, careless errors within the production of a product, and failure to warn clients of the dangers related to a product.
Incorrect medication Negligence or management of medicine is one of the maximum common cases of clinical negligence suggested. this can occur whilst a patient is prescribed the incorrect drug for his or her infection, gets any other patient's medication or gets an incorrect dosage of medicine.
Learn more about Negligence here:
https://brainly.com/question/14480857
#SPJ4
Based on your understanding of Props 26 and 27, as well as gaming laws and the recent Supreme Court case, what impact might Props 26 and 27 have on California gaming/gambling?
The impact might Props 26 and 27 have on California gaming/gambling are:
Proposition 27 would assist all tribes in some way such as enhance state revenue to more than $500 million yearly" via taxes and fees.Prop 26 will permits Native American tribes with federal recognition to run roulette, dice games, as well as sportsbooks on their territory.Every tribe would gain from Prop. 27's creation of a steady stream of cash to lower homelessness.The money would be used for general purposes, gambling addiction treatment programs, as well as law enforcement.What is the Proposition 26 and 27 about in California ?Sports betting would be permitted at the four private horse race facilities in California as well as at tribal casinos under Proposition 26. About a dozen Native American groups are paying for it. Additionally, it would enable tribes to start providing roulette and dice games.
Several sizable gaming businesses are funding Proposition 27, which would authorize online sports betting throughout the state. Both casino businesses and tribes could provide online and mobile sports betting under Proposition 27.
Therefore, The bill is best viewed as an attempt by out-of-state corporations to subvert direct democracy in order to increase profits, even though modest portions of income would go toward homelessness programs and tribes with no interest in online betting.
Learn more about Law from
https://brainly.com/question/1060740
#SPJ1
You and a friend are taking a road trip during summer break and decide to stop for lunch. You choose your favorite fast food restaurant. You both order a burger, fries, and a soft drink and chow down. In the afternoon, as you are continuing your journey, both of you begin to feel stomach cramps. They get worse so you decide to go to an urgent care clinic. The doctor there diagnoses you both with food poisoning and prescribes medication. You fill the prescription, check into a hotel, and experience several days of agony. You later discover the cook at the restaurant undercooked the beef in your burger, which caused your food poisoning. You sue the restaurant. Is the restaurant liable to you or is only the employee liable?.
Answer: The owner/manager is liable. So I guess the restaurant.
Explanation:
You and a friend are taking a road trip during summer break and decide to stop for lunch. You choose your favorite fast-food restaurant. You later discover the cook at the restaurant undercooked the beef in your burger, which caused your food poisoning. The restaurant is liable
Who is responsible for food poisoning in a restaurant?A food poisoning lawsuit may hold a number of people accountable, including retailers, food suppliers, and restaurant operators. Because many causes of food poisoning are preventable, a court may rule that food poisoning was caused by negligence.
Yes, you can sue for food poisoning compensation. If you were fed food at a restaurant, hotel, café, bar, or another similar facility that provides food and got food poisoning as a result, you can file a personal injury claim. A restaurant may be held accountable for damages resulting from foodborne illnesses. Illnesses caused by food contamination may give rise to a personal injury claim.
Learn more about food poisoning here:
https://brainly.com/question/16327379
#SPJ2
suppose a judge sitting on a district court in texas is found to have been accepting monetary bribes from lawyers to rule in their favor on several cases. according to the texas constitution, what is the most likely action to be taken regarding this judge?
When a district court judge in Texas is discovered to have taken bribes from attorneys to decide in their favor on a number of cases, the Supreme Court of Texas will probably take steps to remove the judge from office.
The Judicial Conduct Commission has the authority to remove a judge from office for incompetence in the performance of the duties of the office, willful violation of the Code of Judicial Conduct, or persistent violation of rules promulgated by the Supreme Court of Texas.
In other words, judges are free to hold office for however long they see fit, and the only way to remove them from through impeachment.
A quorum must consist of seven persons. With the exception of recommendations for a judge's retirement, suspension, or removal, which must be granted by a vote of at least seven members, decisions must be made by most of those present.
To know more about Texas Supreme Court: https://brainly.com/question/14673579
#SPJ4
What is partiinost?
1. Which of the following is not a * 5 points
general defense to prosecution?
O A. Insanity
O B. Mistake of fact
O C. Entrapment
OD. Voluntary intoxication
Answer:b
Explanation: Mistake of fact is a general defence t oprocecution
The california state bar recently reversed its decision and will now release documents relating to complaints against.
The California nation bar recently reversed its selection and could now release documents: Tom Girardi — records that the agency previously claimed had to continue to be secret.
A document is a file of a few statistics that may be used as an expert or for reference, further analyses, or study.
The cause of a file is to facilitate the transfer of data from its writer to its readers. it's far the author's task to lay out the document so that the facts it contains can be interpreted as it should be and successfully. To try this, the author can make use of hard and fast stylistic equipment.
The four styles of documentation are:
getting to know-oriented tutorials.intention-orientated how-to guides.know-how-oriented discussions.facts-orientated reference fabric.Learn more about document here:
https://brainly.com/question/16650739
#SPJ4
Pair the word with the definition
all economic activity directed toward
strengthening the nation
vassals control land in exchange
for service to a lord
prices of goods and services
set by supply and demand
the government owns
all means of production
Capitalism
Fascism
Feudalism
Communism
Answer:
Vietnam was and is a civil war and a war for national independence, ... standing ready to provide asylum to all those South Vietnamese who believe.
Explanation:
A. Why is a comparative analysis of democratic nations useful for academics and policymakers?
B. Analyze the common methodological strategies used by political scientists in the comparative analysis of nations and politics. In other words, why are these strategies appropriately selected?
C. How effective is each methodological strategy in analyzing real-world political outcomes
Comparative analysis of democratic nations useful for academics and policymakers because it centres on politics around a method, not a particular object of study which widens the scope of the beneficiary.
The common methodological strategies used by political scientists is comparative method. The comparative method is important to political science because the other main scientific methodologies are more difficult to employ.
How effective is each methodological strategy in analyzing real-world political outcomes?Experiments are very difficult to carry out in political science. There seems not to be the level of recurrence and exactness in politics as there is in the natural world.
The statistical method is employed more often in political science, however, it requires mathematical manipulation of quantitative data over a large number of cases. The higher the number of cases, the stronger one inferences from the data. For a smaller number of cases, like countries, of which there is a limited number, the comparative method may be superior to statistical methodology.
Summarily, the comparative method is useful to the study of politics in smaller cases that require comparative analysis between variables.
Therefore, the correct answer is as given above.
learn more about comparative method: https://brainly.com/question/236981
#SPJ1
If an individual is a least ________ years old but under the age of 18, their driving privileges are subject to suspension or postponement for a graffiti conviction.
If an individual is at least a graffiti year old but under the age of 18, their driving privileges are subject to suspension or postponement for a graffiti conviction.
Using isn't a constitutional proper. You get your driver's license based on the abilities you have and the policies you agree to follow. when you get your driving license you must preserve to illustrate your ability to power appropriately on the street.
Driving privilege” approach the provision of authority by way of jurisdiction to a person that permits that character to pressure a vehicle on highways inside that jurisdiction. using privileges supplies the authority to someone, not to an automobile.
Driving is a privilege, now not proper. the ones granted the privilege have met sure conditions, along with being a citizen of a sure age, and agree to abide by way of sure requirements, along with obeying the regulations of the road.
Learn more about Driving privilege here:
https://brainly.com/question/22682907
#SPJ4
TRUE OR FALSE: To assess a threat, you should
ignore behavior and focus on WHO the person is-
age, appearance, race, ethnicity, nationality,
gender, etc.
O True
O False
Answer:
False, because there's many ways to assess a threat than focus on what the person really is.
If you were a candidate for the US House of Representatives this fall, what one issue would be most important to you?
Someone is the part of the US House of Representatives this fall, are the main issues was the jobs and the economy system.
What is House of Representatives?
The Senate and the House of the Representative was the important part of the Congress. The House of the Representative are the cabinet members are the rises of the issues and the remedies of the solving the disputes.
According to the House of the Representative, the member are the mostly rises on the issues are the economy related issues included the employment, healthcare system, and the education system. The candidate for the US House of the Representative are included this kind of the issues.
Hence, the significance of the House of Representatives, aforementioned.
Learn more about on House of Representatives, here:
https://brainly.com/question/747415
#SPJ1
How has national security impacted civil liberties?
The national security has been impacting the civil liberties by making provision for the arm forces so that they can protect nation from internal threat and offer a civil defense for people.
What is the function of the national security in impacting the civil liberties?The function of the national security in impacting the civil liberties because they help in the provision of the security that is needed for the public so that there wont be any national treat as a result of the provision of the armed forces to protect the lives as well as the property of the people.
It should be noted that once their is tight security in the country there will be a liberty.
Learn more about civil liberties at:
https://brainly.com/question/276885
#SPJ1
Congress has created many courts under article iii section i. Currently, the federal court system is composed of _____ district courts.
Congress has created many courts under article iii section i. Currently, the federal court system is composed of 13 courts of appeals and 94 district courts.
American district courts are the trial courts of the U.S. federal judiciary. there may be one district courtroom for each federal judicial district, which every cowl one U.S. state or, in a few instances, a portion of a state. each district courtroom has at least one courthouse, and plenty of districts have a couple. Federal courts enjoy the sole energy to interpret the regulation, determine the constitutionality of the regulation, and use it in individual instances. The courts, like Congress, can compel the production of evidence and testimony via the usage of a subpoena.
The Federal courtroom of Malaysia (Malay: Mahkamah Persekutuan Malaysia) is the highest courtroom and the final appellate courtroom in Malaysia. it's far housed inside the Palace of Justice in Putrajaya. The court turned into installed throughout Malaya's independence in 1957 and acquired its contemporary call in 1994.
Learn more about Federal courts here:
https://brainly.com/question/25947870
#SPJ4
The table identifies how many thousands of units of corn and diamonds the United States and Congo can produce in one week. Use this data to answer the question that follows.
Based on units of corn and diamonds produced in the United States, the opportunity cost of corn production is B.10⁄60.
What is the opportunity cost of corn production?
The opportunity cost of US corn production is the number of diamonds consumed to produce one unit of corn.
This is calculated as follows:
= diamond units / corn units
= 10 / 60 diamonds
Finally, option B is correct.
Learn more about opportunity cost https://brainly.com/question/8846809
#SPJ1
Answer: the correct answer is A
Explanation: I got it correct on test
How is an executive order similar to a law?
it must pass both houses of congress
if you break it you can be fined and/or go to jail
its made by the same branch
the next president can easily undo it
Answer:
Executive Orders state mandatory requirements for the Executive Branch, and have the effect of law. They are issued in relation to a law passed by Congress or based on powers granted to the President in the Constitution and must be consistent with those authorities.
