Which of the following would be considered an empirical formula?
Group of answer choices
C6H6
C2H6
NO2
C2H4N2

The atomic radius for BCC is [tex]r=1.4011\times10^-^8\ cm[/tex] and the atomic radius for FCC is [tex]r=1.352\times 10^-^1^0\ cm[/tex] .

The atomic radius measures the separation between an atom's nucleus and its outermost electron shell. Typically, it is expressed in picometers (pm).

The radius of an atom depends on the element. While certain elements, like fluorine, have a small atomic radius, others, like cesium, have huge atomic radii.

For BCC metal:

[tex]r=\frac{\sqrt[a]{3} }{4} \\\\= \frac{0.3236\times 20^-7\times\sqrt{3}) }4\\r=1.4011\times10^-^8\ cm[/tex]

For FCC metal:

[tex]r=\frac{\sqrt{2a} }{4} \\= {\sqrt{2} \times3.827\times10^-^1^0}/{4}[/tex]

[tex]r=1.352\times 10^-^1^0\ cm[/tex]

Thus, the atomic radius for the metal BCC is [tex]r=1.4011\times10^-^8\ cm[/tex] and the atomic radius for FCC is [tex]r=1.352\times 10^-^1^0\ cm[/tex] .

Learn more about atomic radius, here:

https://brainly.com/question/13963619

#SPJ4

Bohr's model of the atom included the energy levels that Rutherford's model of the atom did not have.

The Bohr's model is a model of atomic structure proposed by Niels Bohr in 1913.

This model has since been replaced by the quantum mechanical model, but it still helps to clarify certain concepts and predict certain outcomes.

It depicted the electrons in the atom as being situated in specific layers, or energy levels, surrounding the nucleus.

The Rutherford's model of the atom did not include the concept of energy levels, but Bohr's model did.

According to this model, electrons traveled around the nucleus in specific, discrete energy levels.

Electrons could also move from one energy level to another by either absorbing or releasing energy.

As a result, Bohr's model is frequently referred to as the planetary model of the atom.

To know more about  Rutherford's model visit;

https://brainly.com/question/30087408

#SPJ11

The contribution to the weighted average for the x-21 isotope = (0.86102) × (21.00) = 18.08642amu

Therefore, the contribution of x-19 isotope to the weighted average is 2.62482amu and the percentage of the x-21 isotope is 86.102%.

Let's solve the given problem. The unknown element has two isotopes; the abundances are given below:x-19; abundance is 13.898%x-21; abundance is 100 - 13.898

= 86.102%

The contribution to the weighted average from the x-19 isotope with a mass of 19.00 amu can be calculated as follows:

Mass of x-19 isotope

= 19.00 amu Abundance of x-19 isotope

= 13.898% or 0.13898Contributions to the weighted average for x-19 isotope

= (0.13898) × (19.00)

= 2.62482amu

The percentage of the x-21 isotope can be calculated as follows:

Mass of x-21 isotope

= 21.00 amu Abundance of x-21 isotope

= 100 - 13.898

= 86.102% or 0.86102.

The contribution to the weighted average for the x-21 isotope

= (0.86102) × (21.00)

= 18.08642amu

Therefore, the contribution of x-19 isotope to the weighted average is 2.62482amu and the percentage of the x-21 isotope is 86.102%.

To know more about isotope visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28039996

#SPJ11

The mass of the cube of gold measuring 2.0 inches on each side is 2.56 kg.

Given that gold has a density of 19.3 g/cm³ and the cube of gold has sides of 2.0 inches, we need to calculate the mass of the cube in kg without using the density formula. We can convert the length of each side of the cube from inches to cm by using the conversion factor 1 inch = 2.54 cm.

Therefore, each side of the cube measures:2.0 inches × 2.54 cm/inch = 5.08 cm. The volume of the cube can be calculated by raising the length of one side to the third power, i.e.,

V = (side)³ = (5.08 cm)³ = 132.5 cm³

The mass of the cube can be calculated by using the density of gold and the volume of the cube. However, we are not supposed to use the density formula, so we can use unit analysis to determine the mass in kg. We have:

19.3 g/cm³ = 19.3 g/cm³ × 1 kg/1000 g = 0.0193 kg/cm³

Multiplying this by the volume of the cube in cm³, we get:

0.0193 kg/cm³ × 132.5 cm³ = 2.56 kg

Therefore, the mass of the cube of gold measuring 2.0 inches on each side is 2.56 kg.

To know more about density visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29775886

#SPJ11

The conversion factor that should be used to convert an area from square inches ([tex]\text in^2[/tex]) to square centimeters ([tex]\text cm^2[/tex]) is [tex]\rm (2.54 cm)^2[/tex] / [tex]\rm (1 in)^2[/tex] .

A conversion factor is a numerical ratio that expresses the relationship between two different units of measurement. It is used to convert a quantity from one unit to another unit.

In this case, conversion factor between inches (in) and centimeters (cm) is 1 in = 2.54 cm, so the conversion factor between square inches and square centimeters is:

[tex]\rm (1 in)^2 = (2.54 cm)^2[/tex]

Squaring both sides of the equation gives:

[tex]\rm 1 in^2 = (2.54 cm)^2[/tex]

Therefore, to convert an area from square inches to square centimeters, we can multiply the area in square inches by the conversion factor:

area in [tex]\rm cm^2[/tex] = area in [tex]\rm in^2 \times (2.54 cm)^2 / (1 in)^2[/tex]

Simplifying the expression gives:

area in [tex]\rm cm^2[/tex] = area in[tex]\rm in^2 \times 6.4516[/tex]

So, to convert an area from square inches to square centimeters, we should multiply the area in square inches by 6.4516.

Therefore, The conversion factor between square inches and square centimeters is[tex]\rm (2.54 cm)^2[/tex] / [tex]\rm(1 in)^2[/tex], and to convert an area from square inches to square centimeters, we should multiply the area in square inches by 6.4516.

Learn more about conversion factor here:

https://brainly.com/question/32020768

#SPJ4

The following chemical equations have been balanced using the appropriate coefficients.

Mg(OH)2 + NaCl → MgCl2 + 2NaOH

H2SO4 + BaCl2 → BaSO4↓ + 2HCl

AgNO3 + Fe(NO3)2 → AgFeO2↓ + 2NO3

Balancing chemical equations in chemistry involves adjusting the coefficients of the reactants and products in a chemical reaction so that the number of atoms of each element is equal on both sides of the equation.

Note: Never change the subscripts in a chemical formula to balance an equation. Only coefficients can be changed.

Mg(OH)2 + NaCl → MgCl2 + 2NaOH

H2SO4 + BaCl2 → BaSO4↓ + 2HCl

AgNO3 + Fe(NO3)2 → AgFeO2↓ + 2NO3

MgCl2 + 2NaOH → Mg(OH)2↓ + 2NaCl

3NaOH + Fe2(SO4)3 → Fe(OH)3↓ + 3Na2SO4

Pb(NO3)2 + 2KCl → PbCl2↓ + 2KNO3

MgSO4 + BaCl2 → MgCl2 + BaSO4↓

Cu(NO3)2 + 2KOH → Cu(OH)2↓ + 2KNO3

Al(OH)3 + NaOH → NaAlO2 + 2H2O

BaCO3 + H2SO4 → BaSO4↓ + CO2↑ + H2O

ZnCl2 + 2AgNO3 → 2AgCl↓ + Zn(NO3)2

BaSO4 + 2KOH → Ba(OH)2↓ + K2SO4

Fe(NO3)3 + 3KOH → Fe(OH)3↓ + 3KNO3

NaHCO3 + KHCO3 → NaKHCO3 + H2O + CO2↑

Ba(OH)2 + Na2CO3 → BaCO3↓ + 2NaOH

Al + H2SO4 → Al2(SO4)3 + H2↑

Learn more on balancing equation on https://brainly.com/question/11904811

#SPJ1

The PH of the given prepared solution is: pH = 5.056

Acetic acid (CH₃COOH), is in equilibrium with water and as a result, the chemical equation is expressed as:

CH₃COOH + H₂O ⇄ CH₃COO⁻ + H₃O⁺

From here, we can get the H-H equation to find pH of a solution:

pH = pka + log₁₀ [CH₃COO⁻] / [CH₃COOH]

Where:

Molarity of acetic acid, [CH₃COOH] = 0.150mol / 1.00L = 0.150M

Molarity of acetate ion, [CH₃COO⁻] = 0.300mol / 1.00L = 0.300M.

pKa of the buffer = -log Ka: 4.754

Plugging in the relevant values gives us:

pH = 4.754 + log₁₀ [0.300M] / [0.150M]

pH = 5.056

Read more about PH of solution at: https://brainly.com/question/26424076

#SPJ4

Complete question is:

Calculate the pH of a solution prepared by dissolving 0.150 mol of acetic acid and 0.300 mol of sodium acetate in water sufficient to yield 1.00 L of solution. The Ka of acetic acid is 1.76 ⋅ 10-5. Calculate the pH of a solution prepared by dissolving 0.150 mol of acetic acid and 0.300 mol of sodium acetate in water sufficient to yield 1.00 L of solution. The Ka of acetic acid is 1.76 10-5. 3.892 10.158 5.056 2.516 4.502

The correct plot that Logger Pro should display while performing absorption spectrometry is Absorbance vs. Wavelength. This is because Absorbance vs. Wavelength is a graph of how much light of each wavelength is absorbed by the sample.

Absorbance is the logarithm of the ratio of the incident light intensity to the transmitted light intensity, and it is proportional to the concentration of the analyte in the solution.The relationship between absorbance and concentration is given by Beer-Lambert Law. The Beer-Lambert Law, also known as the Beer-Lambert-Bouguer Law, describes the absorption of light by a material as a function of its concentration. The law states that absorbance is proportional to the path length, the concentration of the absorbing species, and the molar absorptivity, which is a property of the absorbing species and the wavelength of light used.

Logger Pro is software that is used to collect and analyze data from various experiments, including absorption spectrometry. It is useful for plotting graphs of data collected from an experiment. In summary, the plot that Logger Pro should display during absorption spectrometry is Absorbance vs. Wavelength, which helps determine the concentration of an analyte in a solution using the Beer-Lambert Law.

To know more about spectrometry visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/27549121

#SPJ11

The choice of looking for the maximum absorption in the range of 550-650 nm, rather than the range of 350-450 nm, is based on the understanding of the electronic transitions and the absorption properties of the Cu(NH₃)₄²⁺ complex.

In the visible region, electronic transitions involving the d-orbitals of transition metals commonly occur. Cu²⁺ ions have partially filled d-orbitals, which can undergo electronic transitions when exposed to light. These transitions result in the absorption of specific wavelengths of light and give rise to visible color.

Typically, transition metal complexes exhibit intense absorption bands in the visible region due to d-d electronic transitions. The exact wavelengths of maximum absorption are influenced by the ligand environment around the central metal ion and the nature of the metal ion itself.

In the case of the Cu(NH₃)₄²⁺ complex, the presence of four ammonia (NH₃) ligands significantly affects the electronic structure and energy levels. This ligand field splitting leads to transitions with characteristic energies in the visible region. The strong absorption observed in the visible range implies that the complex absorbs light of longer wavelengths (lower energies).

Therefore, searching for the maximum absorption (analytical wavelength) in the range of 550-650 nm is more reasonable as it corresponds to the visible region where the complex is expected to exhibit strong absorption. On the other hand, searching in the range of 350-450 nm would likely be less productive for this particular complex since it falls outside the expected absorption range based on the ligand field and the nature of Cu²⁺ ions.

For more such questions on absorption

https://brainly.com/question/10252035

#SPJ4

The final volume of the gas is 209.35 mL.

To find the final volume, we can use the formula W = P * ΔV, where W is the work done, P is the pressure, and ΔV is the change in volume.

We can rearrange the formula W = P * ΔV to solve for ΔV:

ΔV = W / P.

Substituting the given values,

ΔV = 147 J / (1.04 atm) = 141.35 mL.

To find the final volume, we add the change in volume to the initial volume:

Final volume = Initial volume + ΔV = 68.0 mL + 141.35 mL = 209.35 mL.

So, the final volume of the gas is 209.35 mL.

Learn more about volume here:

https://brainly.com/question/15110960

#SPJ11

In the given chemical reaction [tex]\rm NaOH + CO_2 \rightarrow Na_2CO_3 + H_2O[/tex], the limiting reagent is carbon dioxide and [tex]\rm Na_2CO_3[/tex] that can be produced is 1.00 mol, and 0.85 mol of NaOH remains unreacted after the completion of the reaction.

The limiting reagent is the reactant that gets completely consumed in a chemical reaction, thereby limiting the amount of product that can be formed.

The balanced chemical equation for the reaction between sodium hydroxide and carbon dioxide is:

[tex]\rm NaOH + CO_2 \rightarrow Na_2CO_3 + H_2O[/tex]

To determine which reactant is limiting, we need to calculate the number of moles of sodium hydroxide and carbon dioxide present and compare the mole ratios of the reactants in the balanced equation.

Moles of NaOH = 1.85 mol

Moles of [tex]\rm CO_2[/tex] = 1.00 mol

The balanced equation shows that the mole ratio of NaOH to [tex]\rm CO_2[/tex] is 2:1, which means that 2 moles of NaOH react with 1 mole of [tex]\rm CO_2[/tex] .

Using the mole ratio, we can calculate the maximum number of moles of Na2CO3 that can be produced by each reactant:

Moles of NaOH / 2 = 0.925 mol [tex]\rm Na_2CO_3[/tex]

Moles of[tex]\rm CO_2 \times 1[/tex] /1 = 1.00 mol [tex]\rm Na_2CO_3[/tex]

Since the calculated number of moles of [tex]\rm Na_2CO_3[/tex] from [tex]\rm CO_2[/tex] is less than the calculated number of moles of [tex]\rm Na_2CO_3[/tex] from NaOH, [tex]\rm CO_2[/tex] is the limiting reactant.

According to the balanced equation, 1 mole of [tex]\rm CO_2[/tex] reacts to form 1 mole of [tex]\rm Na_2CO_3[/tex] . Therefore, the number of moles of [tex]\rm Na_2CO_3[/tex] produced is 1.00 mol.

To determine the amount of excess reactant remaining after the reaction, we need to calculate the amount of NaOH that did not react.

Moles of NaOH remaining = Moles of NaOH - (Moles of [tex]\rm Na_2CO_3[/tex] produced x 2)

= 0.85 mol NaOH

Therefore, 0.85 mol of NaOH remains unreacted after the completion of the reaction.

In conclusion, carbon dioxide is the limiting reactant, and 1.00 mol of [tex]\rm Na_2CO_3[/tex] can be produced. 0.85 mol of NaOH remains unreacted after the completion of the reaction.

Learn more about limiting reagent here:

https://brainly.com/question/31171741

#SPJ4

The question is incomplete. The complete question is:

Sodium hydroxide reacts with carbon dioxide as follow:

[tex]\rm NaOH + CO_2 \rightarrow Na_2CO_3 + H_2O[/tex]

Which reagent (reactant) is limiting when 1.85 mol of sodium hydroxide and 1.00 mol carbon dioxide are allowed to react? How many moles of sodium carbonate can be produced? How many moles of the excess reactant remain after the completion of the reaction?

The atomic models after Dalton's time that included ideas about the atomic structure are Rutherford's model, Thomson's model, Bohr's model, and Schrödinger's model.

Thomson's atomic model is missing from this set.

Thomson proposed the atomic model known as the plum pudding model in the year 1904.

The atomic model shows that atoms are made up of negatively charged particles and positively charged particles that are distributed evenly throughout the atom, much like raisins in a plum pudding.

In 1911, Ernest Rutherford discovered the atomic nucleus, which is made up of positively charged particles, through his gold foil experiment.

Rutherford proposed an atomic model in which the nucleus was located at the center of the atom, surrounded by negatively charged particles, in the same year.

This model is also known as the planetary model of the atom.

In 1913, Niels Bohr proposed a new atomic model based on Rutherford's planetary model that included electron orbits.

Bohr's atomic model predicted atomic spectra for elements that were consistent with observations.

In 1926, Erwin Schrödinger proposed the quantum mechanical model of the atom, which describes electrons in terms of probability distributions rather than fixed orbits.

The electrons in this model are described as wavefunctions.

To know more about Rutherford's model visit;

https://brainly.com/question/30087408

#SPJ11

Serial dilution refers to the process of diluting a sample in stages, such that the dilution factor is constant for each stage.

Here is how to make three serial dilutions, each generating 400 mL of a 1 -in- 4 dilution of a 3M stock solution.

1. Start by adding 100 ml of the 3M stock solution to a 300 ml volume of distilled water.

2. Mix well to obtain a 1:4 dilution.

3. Now, remove 100 ml of this solution and place it in a new 300 ml volume of distilled water.

4. Mix well to obtain a 1:4 dilution again.

5. Repeat the above process to make a third serial dilution. That is, remove 100 ml of the second dilution and add it to a new 300 ml volume of distilled water.

6. Mix well to obtain a 1:4 dilution again.

7. Repeat this until you have made the desired dilution.

To know more about dilution factor visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30887569

#SPJ11

Answer:

Mg will lose 2 electrons and become positively charged.

Explanation:

Using its electron configuration, it will want to use the closest Noble Gas to "replace" part of its electron config.  Since Neon is #10 and Mg is #12, Mg will be losing 2 valence electrons, becoming positively charged as it is going down.

The calibration curve is a plot of absorbance versus concentration. It is used to determine the relationship between concentration and absorbance for a given substance. The curve is constructed by measuring the absorbance of a series of solutions with known concentrations and plotting the data.

The curve is typically linear, and the equation for the line is used to calculate the concentration of an unknown solution based on its absorbance value.Calibration curves are used in various analytical techniques, including spectrophotometry and chromatography. The curve is not synonymous with the term "absorption spectrum," which refers to the range of wavelengths absorbed by a substance. It is also not used to determine the lambda max of a chemical substance. The lambda max is the wavelength at which a substance absorbs the most light and is typically determined by measuring the absorbance of a solution at different wavelengths.

Therefore, the correct statement for the calibration curve is that it is directly related to Beer's Law, and it is a plot of absorbance vs. concentration.

To know more about calibration curve visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/30590682

#SPJ11

The concentration of the drug in the bloodstream 204 minutes after injection will be 0.227 μgmL.

Reaction order: Zero-order

The zero-order reaction can be defined as a reaction in which the rate of the reaction is independent of the concentration of the reactant(s).Rate of the reaction= k [NH3]0= k

If the initial concentration of NH3 is [NH3]0 and the concentration at time t is [NH3], then the rate of the reaction is given by:rate= -Δ[NH3]/Δt= k [NH3]0

Since the rate is zero order in NH3, we can write:Δ[NH3]= -k Δt

Integrated rate law for zero-order reactions can be given as

[NH3]= -kt + [NH3]0

Here, [NH3]0 is the initial concentration of ammonia (0.200 M), and [NH3] is the concentration at any time t, t is the time for which we want to calculate the concentration of ammonia, and k = 0.0095 M/s.

As we have to find out the time after which the concentration of ammonia reduces to 100 mmol, we will plug this value in the above equation.

[NH3] = -kt + [NH3]0[NH3]

= -0.0095 * t + 0.2 (where [NH3] = 0.1 M and t = time taken to reduce ammonia concentration to 100 mmol)

0.1 = -0.0095t + 0.20.0095t

= 0.1 - 0.02t

= (0.1 - 0.02)/0.0095t

= 7.37 min (approximately)

Therefore, after 7.37 min, the concentration of ammonia will be 0.1 M.2. Half-life of the reaction: 51 minutes

We have to find the concentration of the drug in the bloodstream 204 minutes after injection. The half-life of the reaction is 51 minutes. We can use the integrated rate law for first-order reactions:

ln [A] = -kt + ln[A]0

Here, [A]0 is the initial concentration of the drug, k is the rate constant, and t is time. We can use the formula of half-life to calculate the rate constant:

k = 0.693/τ (where τ is half-life)

k = 0.693/51

k = 0.0136 min-1

Substitute the value of k and t into the integrated rate law for first-order reactions:

ln [A] = -kt + ln[A]0

ln [A] = -0.0136 * 204 + ln(0.75)

ln [A] = -2.7712 + ln(0.75)

[A] = e^-2.7712+ ln(0.75)

[A] = 0.227 μgmL (approximately)

Therefore, the concentration of the drug in the bloodstream 204 minutes after injection will be 0.227 μgmL.

To know more about concentration visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30862855

#SPJ11

Cis-trans isomerism is commonly seen in cycloalkenes having two or more substituents in them. It does not arise in cycloalkanes. Therefore, none of the cycloalkanes of molecular formula C5H10 show cis-trans isomerism.

Cycloalkanes are hydrocarbons containing only carbon and hydrogen atoms arranged in a closed ring. These are members of the homologous series of alkanes. The general formula of cycloalkanes is CnH2n where n is the number of carbon atoms.

In cycloalkanes, each carbon atom has four bonds with neighboring atoms, out of which two bonds are formed with neighboring carbon atoms and the remaining two bonds are formed with hydrogen atoms. Cycloalkanes can be both saturated and unsaturated.

To know more about cycloalkanes visit:

https://brainly.com/question/9982750

#SPJ11

The characteristic of an element's atoms that always determines the element's identity is the number of protons in the nucleus. This is also known as the atomic number of the element.

An element is a substance made up of a single type of atom.

Elements can be identified by their atomic number, which is the number of protons in the nucleus of each of their atoms.

Each element has a unique atomic number. This means that no two elements can have the same atomic number.

For example, the element oxygen has an atomic number of 8, which means that all oxygen atoms have 8 protons in their nuclei.

To know more about atomic number visit;

https://brainly.com/question/8834373

#SPJ11

The complete question is-

A chemist is identifying the elements present in a sample of seawater. What characteristic of an element's atoms always determines the element's identity? In other words, what specific property of an element's atoms uniquely distinguishes it from atoms of other elements, allowing chemists to identify and differentiate between different elements in a sample?

The compound sodium bromide is a strong electrolyte. The reaction when solid sodium bromide is put into water can be written as follows:NaBr (s) + H2O (l) → Na+ (aq) + Br- (aq).

The compound sodium bromide is made up of positively charged sodium ions (Na+) and negatively charged bromide ions (Br-).In a water solution, ionic compounds like sodium bromide split into their constituent ions, allowing electricity to flow via the ions.

Sodium bromide is an example of a strong electrolyte because it completely dissociates into its constituent ions in aqueous solution. In a water solution, ionic compounds like sodium bromide split into their constituent ions, allowing electricity to flow via the ions.

To know more about sodium bromide visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/15409724

#SPJ11

The boiling point of the given liquid is 89.3°C.

Given data: Vapor pressure at 23°C = 92.0 Torr

Vapor pressure at 45°C = 299.0 Torr

We have to find the value of ΔHvap for this liquid.

ΔHvap= -R*(T2-T1) /ln(P2/P1)

Where, R is the gas constant

T1 = 23°C = 23+273 = 296K

T2 = 45°C = 45+273 = 318K

P1 = 92.0 Torr

P2 = 299.0 Torr

Plugging these values into the above formula,

ΔHvap= -8.314*(318-296) /ln(299/92)

= 29.44 kJ/mol (approx)

The normal boiling point of the liquid can be calculated as follows:

ln(P2/P1) = ΔHvap/R * (1/T1 - 1/T2)

Rearranging the above equation we get,

T2 = ΔHvap / R * (ln(P2/P1)) + 1/T1

T2 = 29.44 kJ/mol / (8.314 J/mol K) * ln(299/92) + 1/296

T2 = 362.3 K or 89.3°C

Therefore, the boiling point of the given liquid is 89.3°C.

To know more about boiling visit:

https://brainly.com/question/1416592

#SPJ11

The mass of Ni in the alloy is 0.0323 g, and the percent of nickel in the alloy is 21.53%.

1. The desired properties of precipitates that are formed in gravimetric methods of analysis include:
i. Be completely pure and easily filterable
ii. The precipitate should be of known composition
iii. Large and easily recognizable crystalline structure
iv. The precipitate should be free from impurities
v. The precipitate should be completely insoluble in the mother liquor.

2. Given: Amount of Ni alloy = 0.15 gAmount of Ni-dimethylglyoxime obtained = 175 mgTo determine: The mass and percent of nickel in the alloySolution: The mass of Ni present in Ni-dimethylglyoxime can be calculated by using the molecular weight of Ni-dimethylglyoxime.To calculate the molecular weight of Ni-dimethylglyoxime, multiply the atomic weight of each element by its subscript and then sum the values.

Molecular weight of Ni(H2C4H6O2N2)2  = (58.69 + 2(1.01 × 6) + 2(12.01 × 4) + 2(16 × 2) + 2(14.01 × 2)) g/mol = 318.12 g/mol

Mass of Ni in 175 mg of Ni-dimethylglyoxime  = (58.69 g Ni / 318.12 g Ni(H2C4H6O2N2)2) × 0.175 g = 0.0323 g

Percent of Ni in the alloy = (Mass of Ni / Mass of alloy) × 100% = (0.0323 g / 0.15 g) × 100% = 21.53% (rounded off to two decimal places)Therefore, the mass of Ni in the alloy is 0.0323 g, and the percent of nickel in the alloy is 21.53%.

To know more about mass visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/11954533

#SPJ11

The negligible terms in the energy balance refer to the specific energy change associated with potential energy and kinetic energy.

For the air as a closed system, the negligible terms in the energy balance typically refer to the specific energy change associated with potential energy and kinetic energy. In many cases, these terms can be neglected or assumed to be constant if the changes in elevation and velocity of the air are small and do not significantly affect the overall energy balance.

The energy balance equation for the closed system of air usually focuses on the conservation of internal energy, which includes terms related to heat transfer and work. Neglecting the potential energy and kinetic energy terms simplifies the analysis by assuming that any changes in elevation and velocity are insignificant compared to the other energy transfers involved.

It is important to note that neglecting these terms is an assumption made for simplification purposes and may not be applicable in certain scenarios where elevation changes or air velocity have a significant impact on the energy balance.

Learn more about closed systems at.

https://brainly.com/question/2846657

#SPJ4

The IUPAC names for the following compounds:a. 3-methyl-2-buten-1-ol:  is 3-methyl-2-buten-1-ol.   b. 2,3-dichlorobutane: is 2,3-dichlorobutane. c. 3,5-dimethylbenzoic acid: is 3,5-dimethylbenzoic acid.

1)The IUPAC names for the following compounds:

a. 3-methyl-2-buten-1-ol: The IUPAC name of this compound is 3-methyl-2-buten-1-ol.

b. 2,3-dichlorobutane: The IUPAC name of this compound is 2,3-dichlorobutane.

c. 3,5-dimethylbenzoic acid: The IUPAC name of this compound is 3,5-dimethylbenzoic acid.

2)Structures corresponding to the given names:

a. 3-methyl-2-buten-1-ol:

CH3

  |

CH3-C=C-CH2-CH2-OH

  |

 H

b. 2,3-dichlorobutane:

Cl      Cl

|        |

CH3-CH-CH2-CH2-CH3

|

H

c. 3,5-dimethylbenzoic acid:

CH3

|

CH3-C-COOH

|

H

|

CH3

The above structures represent the compounds described by the given IUPAC names.

To know more about alkane,

brainly.com/question/19465365

#SPJ4

a) The moles of NaOH used in the titration is 0.004158 mol.

b) The moles of HCl reacted with the carbonate is 0.002079 mol.

c) The molar mass of M2CO3⋅3H2O is 213.72 g/mol.

d) The identity of the metal M is unknown without further information.

a) To determine the moles of NaOH used, we multiply the volume (41.58 mL) by the molarity (0.1138 M) and convert to moles, resulting in 0.004158 mol.

b) The moles of HCl reacted with the carbonate can be calculated using the stoichiometry of the reaction. From the balanced equation, we see that each mole of CO3^2- reacts with two moles of HCl. Since 10.00 mL of 1.000 M HCl was used, the moles reacted is (1.000 mol/L) * (0.01000 L) * 2 = 0.0020 mol.

c) The molar mass of M2CO3⋅3H2O can be calculated by dividing the mass (5.000 g) by the number of moles (0.004158 mol), resulting in 1203.34 g/mol. However, we should consider the significant figures given in the question, so the molar mass is approximately 213.7 g/mol.

d) The identity of the metal M cannot be determined solely based on the information provided. More information is needed to identify the specific metal in the carbonate compound.

To know more about stoichiometry here: brainly.com/question/28780091

#SPJ11

From 1985 to 2014, the general trend in the size of the area with pH levels less than or equal to 4.5 (indicating acidic environment) showed an increase. This trend suggests that over this time period, the acidic areas expanded or became more prevalent.

Several factors contribute to this trend. One major factor is human activities, particularly the burning of fossil fuels and industrial emissions. These activities release pollutants such as sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides into the atmosphere, which can then react with water and form acids, leading to acid rain. Acid rain can contribute to the acidification of soil and water bodies, leading to a decrease in pH levels.

Another contributing factor is deforestation. When forests are cleared, the soil is exposed to rainfall, which can lead to increased leaching of acidic compounds into the soil and water systems. Additionally, without the buffering capacity of trees, the pH of the soil can become more susceptible to fluctuations.

Climate change can also impact pH levels. Rising temperatures can affect the carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere, leading to increased absorption of CO2 by the oceans. This can result in ocean acidification, where the pH of seawater decreases, negatively impacting marine life.

It is important to note that the trend may vary in different regions due to specific local factors and mitigation efforts. However, overall, the general trend from 1985 to 2014 indicates an increase in the size of areas with pH levels less than or equal to 4.5, signaling a growing concern for acidic environments.

For more such question on pH levels visit:

https://brainly.com/question/172153

#SPJ8

The concentration of the first anion (Br⁻) when the second one (SO₄²⁻) starts to precipitate at 25°C is approximately 0.059 M.

To determine the concentration of the first anion when the second one starts to precipitate, compare the solubility product constants (Ksp) of the two compounds involved.

Given the Ksp values for

PbBr₂ (6.60 × 10⁻⁶) and

PbSO₄ (2.53 × 10⁻⁸),

For PbBr₂:

IP = [Pb²⁺][Br⁻]²

Ksp = [Pb²⁺][Br⁻]²

For PbSO₄:

IP = [Pb²⁺][SO₄²⁻]

Ksp = [Pb²⁺][SO₄²⁻]

Assume that the concentration of the first anion (Br⁻) at this point is x M.

For PbBr₂:

(x)(2x²) = 6.60 × 10⁻⁶

2x³ = 6.60 × 10⁻⁶

x³ = 3.30 × 10⁻⁶

x ≈ 0.059 M

Therefore, the concentration of the first anion (Br⁻) when the second one (SO₄²⁻) starts to precipitate at 25°C is approximately 0.059 M.

Find out more on precipitate here: https://brainly.com/question/30386923

#SPJ4

Complete question:

A solution is 0.0151 Min both Br and SO42-. A 0.191 Msolution of lead(II) nitrate is slowly added to it with a buret. The anion will precipitate from solution first. (Kip for PbBr2-6.60 x 10; Kp for PbSO4 -2.53 × 10-8) Part 2 (1 point) What is the concentration in the solution of the first anion when the second one starts to precipitate at 25°C? M

The mechanisms include:

Step 1: The chlorine atom in Cl2 is electrophilic, meaning that it has a partial positive charge. The carbonyl carbon of acetophenone is nucleophilic, meaning that it has a partial negative charge. The chlorine atom and the carbonyl carbon form a new covalent bond, and a chloride ion is formed.

Step 2: The chlorinated intermediate is unstable because it has a positive charge on a carbon atom. The carbon atom loses a proton, forming a carbocation.

Step 3: A chloride ion attacks the carbocation, forming chloroacetophenone. The chloride ion is a good nucleophile because it has a lone pair of electrons. The lone pair of electrons on the chloride ion attacks the carbocation, forming a new covalent bond.

Step 4: The water molecule abstracts a proton from chloroacetophenone, forming the final product, 2-chloro-1-phenylethanol. The water molecule is a good base because it has a lone pair of electrons. The lone pair of electrons on the water molecule attacks the proton on chloroacetophenone, forming a new covalent bond and a hydroxide ion. The hydroxide ion then leaves, taking the proton with it.

Find out more on acetophenone here; https://brainly.com/question/29585681

#SPJ4

The concentration of each phosphate species in the buffer are H2PO4- = 5.34 mM and HPO42- = 9.66 mM.

The total concentration of a phosphate buffer containing NaH2PO4​ and Na2HPO4​ is 15 mM and pH of the solution is 7.3. We need to calculate the concentration of each phosphate species in the buffer.

Given that pKa​= 7.2.The reaction equation for the phosphate buffer is as follows;

H2PO4- ⇔ HPO42-  + H+

The pKa of the acid is 7.2.

Hence, pH = pKa + log([HPO42-]/[H2PO4-])

or, log([HPO42-]/[H2PO4-]) = pH - pKa

or, log([HPO42-]/[H2PO4-]) = 7.3 - 7.2

or, log([HPO42-]/[H2PO4-]) = 0.1

or, [HPO42-]/[H2PO4-] = 10^(0.1)

or, [HPO42-]/[H2PO4-] = 1.258

or, [H2PO4-] = 15/(1 + 1.258)

= 5.34 m

M [HPO42-] = 15 - 5.34

= 9.66 mM

Therefore, the concentration of each phosphate species in the buffer are as follows:

H2PO4- = 5.34 mM HPO42- = 9.66 mM

To know more about phosphate visit:

https://brainly.com/question/2426918

#SPJ11

The equilibrium concentrations at 1000 K in enclosed vessel are:

[COCl₂] ≈ 0.0531 M

[CO] ≈ 0.4489 M

[Cl₂] ≈ 0.3659 M

To calculate the equilibrium concentrations of each gas at 1000 K, we can use the equilibrium expression and the given initial concentrations. The balanced chemical equation for the reaction is:

CO(g) + Cl₂(g) → COCl₂(g)

The equilibrium constant expression (Kc) for this reaction is given as Kc = [COCl₂] / [CO] [Cl₂], where square brackets denote the concentrations of the respective species.

Given:

[CO] = 0.5020 M

[Cl₂] = 0.4190 M

Kc = 255.0

Let's assume the equilibrium concentrations of COCl₂, CO, and Cl₂ are x, y, and z, respectively. We can set up an ICE (Initial-Change-Equilibrium) table and use the given equilibrium constant expression to determine the equilibrium concentrations.

ICE table:

     CO(g)     +    Cl₂(g)    ⇄   COCl₂(g)

Initial: 0.5020 0.4190 0

Change: -x -z +x

Equilibrium: y z x

Using the equilibrium constant expression, we have:

Kc = [COCl₂] / [CO] [Cl₂]

Substituting the equilibrium concentrations, we get:

255.0 = x / (y × z)

We also know that the initial concentrations of CO and Cl₂ decrease by x and z, respectively, and the equilibrium concentration of COCl₂ increases by x.

Since the initial concentrations of CO and Cl₂ are much greater than the equilibrium concentration of COCl₂, we can approximate that [CO] - x ≈ [CO] and [Cl₂] - z ≈ [Cl₂].

Using this approximation, the equilibrium expression becomes:

255.0 = x / ([CO] × [Cl₂])

Now we can solve for x:

x = 255.0 × ([CO] × [Cl₂])

Substituting the given values:

x = 255.0 × (0.5020 M × 0.4190 M)

x ≈ 0.0531 M

Therefore, the equilibrium concentration of COCl₂ is approximately 0.0531 M.

Since we assumed [CO] - x ≈ [CO], the equilibrium concentration of CO is approximately:

y = [CO] - x = 0.5020 M - 0.0531 M = 0.4489 M

Similarly, since we assumed [Cl₂] - z ≈ [Cl₂], the equilibrium concentration of Cl₂ is approximately:

z = [Cl₂] - x = 0.4190 M - 0.0531 M = 0.3659 M

Hence, the equilibrium concentrations at 1000 K are:

[COCl₂] ≈ 0.0531 M

[CO] ≈ 0.4489 M

[Cl₂] ≈ 0.3659 M

To know more about equilibrium concentrations:

https://brainly.com/question/33648224

#SPJ4

When uranium-235 (U-235) undergoes alpha decay, it emits an alpha particle, which consists of two protons and two neutrons. As a result, the uranium-235 nucleus loses two protons and two neutrons. The correct answer is thorium-231.

When uranium-235 undergoes alpha decay, it releases an alpha particle, which is essentially a helium-4 nucleus consisting of two protons and two neutrons. This emission causes the uranium-235 nucleus to lose two protons and two neutrons.

The resulting isotope produced by this transformation is thorium-231 (Th-231). Thorium-231 has an atomic number of 90 and an atomic mass of 231, as it contains 90 protons and 141 neutrons.

So, when uranium-235 undergoes alpha emission, it transforms into thorium-231 as a byproduct of the decay process.

For more details regarding thorium-231, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/4124665

#SPJ4