Answer:
Closing arguments are the final presentations made by the lawyers to summarize their case, highlight the evidence presented, and persuade the judge or jury to rule in their favour. It is an opportunity for lawyers to emphasize their position, refute opposing arguments, and provide a compelling narrative.
so the answer is this
Both the prosecution and the defence question witnesses.
hope that was helpful to you :)
A person is convicted of armed robbery. In what situation would the defendant be able to appeal the trial court decision?
The trial judge wrote a dissenting opinion.
They can show there was an error of law.
The trial used an adversarial system.
There was irrelevant evidence.
Answer:
The defendant would be able to appeal the trial court decision in the following situation:
They can show there was an error of law: If the defendant can demonstrate that there was a legal error made during the trial proceedings, such as an incorrect interpretation or application of the law, it could provide grounds for an appeal.
It's worth noting that the other options you mentioned, such as the trial judge writing a dissenting opinion, the trial using an adversarial system, or the presence of irrelevant evidence, do not necessarily provide direct grounds for an appeal.
A dissenting opinion from the trial judge means that they disagreed with the majority decision, but it doesn't automatically invalidate the trial court decision or provide grounds for an appeal.
The use of an adversarial system is a standard approach in many legal systems and is not in itself a basis for appeal.
The presence of irrelevant evidence may be an issue during the trial, but it does not guarantee the right to appeal unless it significantly impacted the fairness of the trial or affected the outcome in a prejudicial manner.
A person convicted of armed robbery can appeal the trial court decision if they can show an error of law took place during the trial or irrelevant evidence was introduced. A dissenting opinion by the judge or the fact that the trial used an adversarial system are not valid grounds for appeal.
Explanation:A person convicted of armed robbery has the right to appeal the trial court decision under certain circumstances. The most typical situation would involve showing that there was an error of law during the trial. An error of law might occur if the court wrongly applied or interpreted a law, made a procedural mistake, or allowed inadmissible evidence. Furthermore, they may also appeal if irrelevant evidence was introduced that may have influenced the jury's final decision negatively. However, a judge having a dissenting opinion or the simple fact that trial used an adversarial system are not valid grounds for appeal.
Learn more about Appeals in law here:https://brainly.com/question/32247683
#SPJ12
A private citizen files a lawsuit against you for the damage you caused to their vehicle in a collision. What type of case is it?
Civil
Contract
Criminal
Class action
Answer:
Civil
The type of case in this scenario would likely fall under the category of a civil lawsuit for damages, specifically a "personal injury" or "property damage" case.
In the given situation, the private citizen is seeking compensation for the damage caused to their vehicle in a collision, indicating property damage. However, if the collision resulted in any personal injuries to the individual, such as physical harm or emotional distress, the case could also involve a personal injury component.
To determine the specific legal claims and causes of action, would depend on the jurisdiction and applicable laws. Examples of potential legal claims, in this case, could include negligence, where the plaintiff alleges that you failed to exercise reasonable care and caused the collision, or a breach of contract if the collision occurred within the context of a contractual agreement (e.g., a rideshare service or car rental).
hope you found that helpful :)