Senators can use senatorial courtesy as a way to influence the nomination and confirmation process for federal judges and other presidential appointments.
This practice allows senators to give their approval or disapproval of a nominee before the nomination is officially made. If a senator from the same party as the president disapproves of a nominee from their home state, it is considered a "courtesy" for the president to withdraw the nomination. This practice helps to ensure that the nominees are acceptable to the senators from the state in which they will serve. However, it can also lead to delays and obstruction in the confirmation process.
Learn more about senatorial courtesy brainly.com/question/12528524
#SPJ11
an attorney making an opening statement might typically include___.
Typically, an opening statement by an attorney will include a concise summary of the relevant facts and supporting documentation.
A brief explanation of the relevant law and a request for a verdict is typically included in an opening statement. The lawyer describes the requested verdict in the motion for the verdict as well as the supporting evidence. An effective opening statement acts as the trial's route map.
Each side's attorneys are given the opportunity to introduce themselves and the other parties engaged in the case during opening comments. In order to help the jury comprehend the evidence that will be given during the trial, attorneys typically summarise the key details of the case during the opening statement.
To learn more about opening statement visit;
https://brainly.com/question/10956209
#SPJ4
to help others see you during heavy rain, use your
Use your low-beam headlights in a lot of rain to make yourself visible to other people.
What are Low-beam headlights?
Low beam headlights—also referred to as the "headlight lower beam" or "dipped headlights"—are used by drivers when visibility is reduced to less than 100 feet (or less, depending on state regulations), frequently as a result of nighttime or bad weather. They are useful for navigating traffic as well. Typically, we refer to the low beam light when we "switch on our headlights." When it's dark outside, for instance, it's the default setting. Because they illuminate the road more effectively in some situations and enable other drivers to see your car without being blinded, we use low-beam headlights more frequently than high-beam headlights.
To learn more about Low-beam headlights visit;
https://brainly.com/question/30666380
#SPJ4
does a misdemeanor disqualify you from the military
Yes, a misdemeanor can disqualify you from the military.
Misdemeanor is a wrong done by a person, a crime that is not very serious in nature. Punishment provided under such acts are also very minimal such as penalty or fines. These crimes are civil in nature and doesn't involve any injury or harm to human life. A person could face an involuntary administrative discharge based on a civilian conviction, or other civilian court outcome that is considered to be conviction. And military career could be ended by a civilian criminal conviction even if it is only a misdemeanor. It can be used as measure to judge a person behavior in public which can affects a person's carrier in military.
To know more about "misdemeanor" visit-
brainly.com/question/30175834
#SPJ4
Which of the following standards of proof is more than a gut feeling and legally permits a law enforcement officer to stop and frisk a suspect?a. rebuttable presumption
b. reasonable suspicion
c. conclusive presumption
d. mere suspicion
The standard of proof that is more than a gut feeling and legally permits a law enforcement officer to stop and frisk a suspect is "reasonable suspicion".
Reasonable suspicion is a legal requirement that authorises law enforcement authorities to detain and investigate a person for a short period of time if they have specific and articulable evidence that indicate the person may be involved in criminal conduct. A reasonable suspicion requirement is lower than probable cause, which is necessary for a full arrest or search. An officer must have more than a hunch or a subjective emotion to reach the bar of reasonable suspicion, but less than the degree of proof required for probable cause. The particular facts that give rise to reasonable suspicion can vary based on the circumstances of each individual case.
For such more question on law:
https://brainly.com/question/820417
#SPJ4
The law of superposition is a geologic principle used to determine the ______________
The law of superposition is a geologic principle used to determine the relative ages of rock strata, or layers.
Superposition is one of the basis of science of geology, the major principle of stratigraphy stating the layers of the sediment placed in accordance with their age. The law of superposition is based on theory that the youngest rock are always on top and the oldest rock always lies in the bottom. Using this principle, geologists were able to determine which rock layers were the oldest long before the technology existed to calculate the absolute ages of rocks. This principle was considered a great milestone in the field of geology propounded by geologist Nicolaus Steno in the 16th century.
To know more about "law of superposition" visit-
brainly.com/question/12493909
#SPJ4
why does the constitution give implied powers to congress?
Due to precedents established by other authorities, it is assumed that these will be granted. Any given governmental body can't function without these implied powers.
What are implied powers?
Implied powers are those that the federal government of the United States assumes but which are not specifically mentioned in the Constitution. Particularly, implicit powers are those that Congress may use but which are not expressly stated in the constitution of the country. Although not expressly stated in the Constitution, Congress may use whatever authorities deemed "necessary and proper" to carry out its specific duties. The United States Constitution's Article 1 is the source of the majority of these implied powers. In other words, this power gives Congress the ability to effectively lead the country as it develops. This clause was incorporated by the Constitution's initial drafters to let the government's authority evolve through time.
To learn more about implied powers visit;
https://brainly.com/question/27728796
#SPJ4
what did passage of the seventeenth amendment entail?
The passage of the seventeenth amendment entails the election of U.S. senators by popular votes.
The seventeenth amendment of the U.S. Constitution establishes the direct election of the United State senators for each state. The 17th amendment supersedes Article I, Section 3, Clauses 1 and 2 of the Constitution, under which senators of the states were elected by state legislatures. It also alters the procedure for filling vacancies in the Senate, allowing for state legislatures to permit their governors to make temporary appointments until a special election can be held. The amendment was proposed by the 62nd congress in the year 1912 and it became the part of the constitution on 1913, April 8 on ratification by three quarters of the state legislatures.
To know more about "seventeenth amendment" visit-
brainly.com/question/8813331
#SPJ4
the chief justice of the supreme court who ruled in favor of the cherokee nation was...
John Marshall served as the chief justice of the supreme court and delivered the decision that favored the Cherokee people.
This so-called "Treaty Party" in favor of deportation was led by longtime Cherokee political figure Major Ridge. The bulk of Cherokees opposed to relocation were led by John Ross, the senior chief of the Cherokee people. John Ross served as the principal chief of the Cherokee People for about forty years, during which time the tribe experienced some of its most turbulent times.
He is best known for serving as the Cherokees' chief during the intense factional fighting over the decision to move to Indian Territory in the 1830s (Oklahoma). Georgia, the Cherokee Nation was declared to be sovereign by the US Supreme Court.
Learn more about Cherokee Visit: brainly.com/question/2297390
#SPJ4
Answer:
John Marshall
what happens if you unknowingly deposit a fake check
If you deposit a fake check, you could be held liable for the money on it. You can also be responsible for any losses the bank incurs as a result of your deposit.
What Happens If A Fake Check Is Accidentally Deposited?
If you have a bank account, an overdraft fee may probably be charged. The bank will charge you for the amount the fake check overdrew. An overdraft may cost hundreds of dollars.You might lose your job if this causes you to be fired.It will affect your credit history when you're ready to apply for new loans and mortgages.You may also be required to pay back the person who wrote the check if they lost money as a result of your depositing a fake check into their account. Restitution might be expensive to repay in order to repair the relationship with that person.To learn more about overdraft fees visit;
https://brainly.com/question/1739416
#SPJ4
A plaintiff bringing an intentional infliction of emotional distress lawsuit must prove the defendant's action. (True or False)
True, a plaintiff bringing an intentional infliction of emotional distress lawsuit must prove the defendant's action.
In order to successfully bring a lawsuit for intentional infliction of emotional distress, the plaintiff must prove that the defendant's actions were extreme and outrageous, that the actions caused the plaintiff's emotional distress, and that the emotional distress was severe. Without proving these elements, the plaintiff's lawsuit will not be successful.
To successfully bring anointment onal infliction of emotional distress lawsuit, a plaintiff must generally prove that the defendant's actions were extreme and outrageous, and that they caused the plaintiff severe emotional distress. The plaintiff must also show that the defendant intended to cause emotional distress or recklessly disregarded the high True.
To successfully bring an intentional infliction of emotional distress lawsuit, a plaintiff must generally prove that the defendant's actions were extreme and outrageous, and that they caused the plaintiff severe emotional distress. The plaintiff must also show that the defendant intended to cause emotional distress or recklessly disregarded the high probability that their actions would cause such distress. In other words, the plaintiff must show that the defendant's action was intentional, and that it resulted in emotional distress for the plaintiff.
that their actions would cause such distress. In other words, the plaintiff must show that the defendant's action was intentional, and that it resulted in emotional distress for the plaintiff.
Read more about infliction here:https://brainly.com/question/13948475
#SPJ11
Licensing board has the power to __________ a license for reasons such as unprofessional conduct, substance abuse, or conviction of a felony.
The licensing board has the power to "revoke" a license for reasons such as unprofessional conduct, substance abuse, or conviction of a felony.
Revocation means that the license is completely cancelled and the licensee is no longer authorized to practice or perform activities that require the license.
The act of officially cancelling or invalidating something, often a licence, contract, or privilege, is referred to as revocation. When something is revoked, it is no longer deemed to be in effect or valid. A government agency, for example, may cancel a business licence if it is shown to be operating illegally or participating in unethical conduct. If a person violates the terms of their probation, the court may revoke their probation. In both circumstances, cancelling the licence or probation means that the individual or firm is no longer permitted to engage in the activities or enjoy the benefits associated with that licence or probation.
For such more question on licensing:
https://brainly.com/question/24827828
#SPJ4
T or F: The lands and grooves of a barrel's rifling improve the accuracy of a bullet
The lands and grooves of a rifling barrel are really helpful in improving the accuracy levels of the bullets by a greater margin more often than not. Therefore, the given statement is to be held as true.
It is very much appropriate to be mentioning about the accuracy of a barrel to depend upon the rifling and lands and grooves for a précised bullet being fired from a rifle. The caliber of the gun is the most indispensable part that determines the accuracy of any gun over a prolonged period of time.
Learn more about accuracy here:
https://brainly.com/question/29466313
#SPJ4
federal inmates are required to serve what percentage of their sentences
Federal inmates are required to serve a minimum of 85% of their sentences.
A federal prison refers to a prison which is operated under the jurisdiction of a federal government as opposed to a state or provincial body. Hence, federal inmates are the inmates incarcerated in a federal prison convicted for violating federal law and for inmates who are considered dangerous or sentenced to longer terms of imprisonment.
Federal inmates are required to serve a minimum of 85% of their sentences. This means that if an inmate is sentenced to 10 years in prison, they must serve at least 8.5 years before being eligible for release. This requirement is set by the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, which are designed to ensure that all federal inmates serve a consistent percentage of their sentences. The goal of this requirement is to promote fairness and consistency in the federal criminal justice system.
Learn more about Federal Sentencing Guidelines:
https://brainly.com/question/28156579
#SPJ11
which principle allows the national government to override state governments in certain policy areas?
The principle of federal supremacy allows national government to override the state governments in certain policy areas.
What is federal supremacy?Federal supremacy is a principle in the United States Constitution that establishes the federal government as the ultimate authority in matters of law and policy. It means that federal laws and regulations take precedence over state and local laws when there is a conflict between them. This principle is based on the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution, which states that the Constitution and federal laws shall be the supreme law of the land. The purpose of federal supremacy is to ensure uniformity and consistency in the application of federal law throughout the country, as well as to prevent states from impeding or interfering with federal government functions. However, federal supremacy is not absolute and must be balanced with the principles of federalism and state sovereignty.
To learn more about conflict, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/20372541
#SPJ1
the basic role of the united states government is to
The primary role or responsibilities of the US government include the development and enforcement of social norms, as well as the management of the military, foreign policy, economy, and public services.
Creates laws; legislative (Congress, comprised of the House of Representatives and Senate) Executes legislation as an executive (president, vice president, Cabinet, most federal agencies) Judiciary: Assesses laws (Supreme Court and other courts).
On July 4, 1776, the Second Continental Congress formally proclaimed its independence from the Kingdom of Great Britain, establishing the United States' first independent federal government. It was a temporary administration that oversaw the creation of the Articles of Confederation. The U.S. Federal Government is divided into three branches: the legislative, executive, and judicial. This arrangement promotes the separation of powers.
Learn more about government Visit: brainly.com/question/26119802
#SPJ4
Correct Question:
The basic role of the united states government is to _____.
A tenant properly filed a complaint under state law against his landlord in federal district court under diversity jurisdiction, alleging that the landlord's negligence in failing to repair the stairs in a common area of the apartment building resulted in the tenant falling and sustaining significant injuries. After the landlord served his answer, the tenant moved for summary judgment. In support of his motion, the tenant submitted affidavits from three other tenants in which each stated that she had told the landlord prior to the accident that the stairs needed to be fixed. In opposition to the motion, the landlord submitted an affidavit from the maintenance worker employed by the landlord, stating that the stairs were in good condition on the day of the tenant's accident.
How should the court rule on the motion for summary judgment?
In the situation portrayed above, it may be stated that the court will grant the motion in the interest of the plaintiff, i.e., the tenant.
A court has the power to grant a motion in the case before an actual trial is being held in the court of law as per the legal procedures. In the cases that involve complaints against their landlords, the tenants usually have an upper hand in getting the motion granted by the court in their favors more often than not. Thus, the court readily grants motion in such cases.
Learn more about motion here:
https://brainly.com/question/28432756
#SPJ4
a system that distributes power between state and national governments is called____.
Who was the designated survivor for the State of the Union?
Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg was the selected survivor for the 2021 State of the Union address.
To guarantee the continuation of government in the event of a catastrophic occurrence, the designated survivor is a member of the president's cabinet who is not present during the State of the Union speech.
The president's cabinet member who is not a member of the president's political party is often chosen to be the designated survivor. The chosen survivor is brought to a secret location, where they stay until the conclusion of the address.
To learn more about catastrophic event link is here
brainly.com/question/30634248
#SPJ4
What is the first step in the pre writing process for an argumentative essay
Explanation:
The author should submit an evidence-based claim. Thus, the first step in the prewriting process for an argumentative essay is to develop an opinion.
Japan would restrict emmigration of laborers to the US is part of what agreement?
Japan would restrict immigration of laborers to the US is part of Gentlemen's Agreement.
The Gentlemen's Agreement was a series of informal and nonbinding agreement between japan and the United State in the year 1907 under which Japanese government agreed to voluntarily restrict issuing passports for immigration, good for the continental United States to laborers while the US government promised to protect the rights of Japanese immigrants and their children already residing in the United States. The major aim of the agreement was to calm down immigration issues and war like conditions between the two countries. However, it was later nullified due to criticism from public by the US Immigration Act 1924.
To know more about "Gentlemen's Agreement" visit-
brainly.com/question/13876722
#SPJ4
M1 Analyse the
relationship between
ethics and the law in
terms of their relevance
to own professional
responsibilities as a
health or care
practitioner
Law and ethics in medicine both rest on the principles of self-determination, beneficence, and a concept of justice to be provided to all patients by both medical professionals and society.
Why do healthcare professionals in their line of work have a legal and ethical responsibility?Healthcare professionals have a legal and ethical responsibility to safeguard the individuals they look after. Patients suffer if these obligations are neglected. Healthcare practitioners could potentially face consequences for similar behaviours. Doing what is right for the patient is an example of ethical behaviour or obligation. Practitioners are obligated to abide by the codes of ethics for many healthcare professions.
Thus there is a close relationship between laws and ethics in healthcare workers to protect the patients and prevent the dismantling of the system.
Learn more about ethics, here:
https://brainly.com/question/11992384
#SPJ9
what is the system where the national government shares power with state governments?
Federalism is the system where the national government shares power with state governments.
Federalism is the system of government which divides the power or responsibilities of statutes between the center and the state or other regional bodies. Federalism guarantees sovereignty and in United States both the center and the state enjoy sovereignty. All these power are conferred to the government by the constitution itself, the constitution also protects these divisions from the legislature in order to maintain harmony and proper distribution of powers at all levels of the government. The three branches of the government the legislature, executive and the judiciary work with division of powers and each of these branches are governed by the constitution.
To know more about "Federalism" visit-
brainly.com/question/8305583
#SPJ4
Criminal law actus reus arraignment bail beyond a reasonable doubt burden of proof corporate criminal liability criminal conspiracy criminal intent cruel and unusual punishment defendant double jeopardy entrapment exclusionary rule felony indictment information miranda rule misdemeanors p.136 plea p.141 plea bargain p.142 preponderance presumption of innocence p.134 probable cause p.139 prosecutor p.136 public defender p.136 search warrant p.153 search and seizure p.153 self-incrimination p.155 specific intent p.137 speedy trial p.158 warrantless arrest p.139
A Latin term meaning "guilty act," which refers to the requirement in criminal law that the defendant must have committed a voluntary act that is prohibited by law.
Bail: A sum of money paid by the defendant or a third party to secure the defendant's release from jail before trial.
Criminal conspiracy: An agreement between two or more people to commit a crime.
Defendant: The person accused of committing a crime.
Information: A formal charge filed by a prosecutor that a person has committed a crime.
Plea: A defendant's response to a criminal charge, in which he or she admits guilt (guilty plea), denies guilt (not guilty plea), or declines to contest the charges (no contest plea)
Preponderance: A lower standard of proof than beyond a reasonable doubt, which requires the prosecutor to prove the defendant's guilt to a degree that is more likely than not.
Self-incrimination: The constitutional protection against being forced to testify against oneself.
For such more question on Criminal:
brainly.com/question/9325204
#SPJ4
2. Pilihan ganda30 detik1 ptQ. Of the following, the most significant difference between the Constitution of 1787 and the Articles of Confederation was that the ConstitutionPilihan jawabanmade states sovereign over the national government, while the Articles were based on national sovereignty.was difficult to amend, while the Articles included an easier process requiring approval by a simple majority of states.created a dominant national executive, while the Articles established a dominant national legislature.provided for a strong national government with many powers, while the Articles created a weak central government with few independent powers.
Option 3 is Correct. The creation of a strong national executive by the Constitution of 1787 as opposed to a dominant national legislature by the Articles of Confederation was the key distinction between the two documents.
In the end, the biggest difference between America's two founding documents is that under the Articles, state sovereignty predominated, whereas under the Constitution, after it was approved, the federal government's authority was greatly expanded.
The most significant distinction between these two treaties was that whereas the Constitution established a powerful central authority, the Articles of Confederation provided a central government relatively limited power. The Declaration of Independence served as a justification for leaving a government. A government was intended to be established by the Constitution and Bill of Rights.
Learn more about Constitution Visit: brainly.com/question/470736
#SPJ4
Correct Question:
Of the following, the most significant difference between the Constitution of 1787 and the Articles of Confederation was that the Constitution
answer choices
1. made states sovereign over the national government, while the Articles were based on national sovereignty.
2. was difficult to amend, while the Articles included an easier process requiring approval by a simple majority of states.
3. created a dominant national executive, while the Articles established a dominant national legislature.
4. provided for a strong national government with many powers, while the Articles created a weak central government with few independent powers.
Which of these descriptions is consistent with the federal system?Each of two governing layers holds ultimate authority over different matters. A confederal system of government. The colonies had no formal venue for influencing parliamentary policy. Confederal system
The descriptions that is consistent with the federal system A. Each of two governing layers holds ultimate authority over different matters.
What is the most accurate way to define a federal system?A federal government is a system in which local state governments that are interconnected with the national government and a central national government share power. The national government has power over some aspects of public life, while local governments have control over other aspects.
In federal systems, political power is split between two independent, directly elected sets of governments, one national and the other subnational.
Therefore, option A is correct.
Learn more about federal system at:
https://brainly.com/question/695831
#SPJ1
Controversy surrounding the Affordable Care Act is an example of the friction inherent in___.
a.confederal systems.
b.unitary systems.
c.federalism.
d.cooperative
The controversy surrounding the Affordable Care Act is an example of the friction inherent in federalism.
What is federalism?
Federalism is a combination and compound form of governance that divides the authorities between a general administration (the central or "federal") and regional governments (provincial, state, cantonal, territorial, or other sub-unit governments) within a single political system. In the unions of states under the Old Swiss Confederacy, federalism as it is known now was first practiced. Federalism is distinct from both devolution within a unitary state, in which the regional level of government is subservient to the general level, and confederalism, in which the general level of government is subordinate to the regional level.
To learn more about federalism visit;
https://brainly.com/question/8305583
#SPJ4
which international conference led to an agreement limiting the number of ships of each of the great powers? A)yalta conference B)kellogg-briand pact C)paris peace conference D)washington naval conference
According to the choices of alternatives provided above, it may be stated that the Washington Naval Conference was an event that led to an agreement that limited the number of ships on each of the great powers. Therefore, the option D holds true.
The Washington Naval Conference is the most significant event to have taken place in the American history. By the virtue of this significant event, an agreement was being proposed to be developed between the great powers across the world to have a limitation on the number of ships that they can possess.
Learn more about Washington Naval Conference here:
https://brainly.com/question/20897709
#SPJ4
True or false. All forms of notarial certificates require that the notary public lit the State and County in which the notarial action takes place.
All forms of notarial certificates require that the notary public lit the State and County in which the notarial action takes place. This statement is true.
What are notarial certificates?The notarial certificate is a written declaration that certifies the details of a notarial act and is signed and sealed by a notary public. Giving oaths and accepting acknowledgments are the two most typical notarial actions that a notary will be required to complete. Oaths and acknowledgments are two distinct notarial acts, so each will call for a separate language in the certificate. Always ensure that you utilize proper notarial wording by consulting the commissioning authority in your state.
Notarization of legal documents helps to prevent fraud and ensure that transactions are carried out correctly. In order to weed out forgers and make sure that participants enter into an agreement voluntarily and knowingly, notaries are required to identify signatories to a document while confirming its authenticity.
Learn more about notarial certificates here:
https://brainly.com/question/28465172
#SPJ2
Tarek is single and has an adjusted gross income of $37,059. He claims one
exemption of $12,400. What is his tax due?
Use the table below to help you answer this question.
Tarek's tax due is given as $3200
How to solve for the tax dueTo determine Tarek's tax due, we need to calculate his taxable income, then use the tax tables or a tax calculator to find the amount of tax owed.
First, let's calculate his taxable income:
Adjusted Gross Income (AGI) $37,059
Less: Personal exemption ($12,400)
Taxable Income $24,659
Next, we can use the tax tables for the 2021 tax year to find the amount of tax owed. Based on the taxable income of $24,659 and the tax tables for the 2021 tax year, Tarek's tax due would be approximately $3,206.
Read more on taxes here:https://brainly.com/question/25783927
#SPJ1
Which U.S. Constitutional amendment gives state governments plenary power? a. Fourth b. Sixth c. Tenth d. Fourteenth.
The tenth U.S. Constitutional amendment gives state governments plenary power.
What is plenary power?
According to US constitutional law, plenary power is one that has been granted to an entity or individual in full, without being subject to scrutiny or restrictions on how it may be used. When a plenary authority is given to one body, all other bodies lose their ability to use it if they are not otherwise entitled. Judicial review of plenary powers is not permitted, either in a specific situation or generally.
Due to the nature of the Constitution, which assigns distinct but occasionally overlapping functions to the three parts of the federal government and the states, there are very few glaring examples of such powers in the United States.
To learn more about plenary power visit;
https://brainly.com/question/30653314
#SPJ4
