The Selective Service Act was passed by Congress in 1917 because of the need for American men to join the armed forces to fight in World War I. The act authorized the federal government to raise an army by enlisting men aged between 21 and 30 years old, who were not already serving in the military, by the use of a draft.
The United States' involvement in World War I necessitated the need for a large army. President Woodrow Wilson initially hoped to raise an army through voluntary enlistment, but this method fell short of the necessary number of soldiers needed. Wilson and Congress then agreed that the use of a draft was necessary to ensure that there were enough troops to fight in the war.The Selective Service Act was signed into law on May 18, 1917. It allowed the federal government to create an army through a draft, which required all men between the ages of 21 and 30 to register for military service. Later, the age limit was extended to include men between the ages of 18 and 45.
Once registered, men were chosen through a lottery system, with those selected required to serve in the military until the end of the war. The act was controversial, as many people objected to the draft. Some objected for moral reasons, while others believed that the act violated their constitutional rights. Despite the controversy, the Selective Service Act played a critical role in ensuring that the United States had enough troops to fight in World War I.
The Selective Service Act of 1917 was passed by Congress because of the need for American men to join the armed forces to fight in World War I. The act authorized the federal government to raise an army by enlisting men aged between 21 and 30 years old, who were not already serving in the military, by the use of a draft. Although the act was controversial, it played a critical role in ensuring that the United States had enough troops to fight in World War I.
To know more about controversial visit:
brainly.com/question/31631408
#SPJ11
following the 1896 presidential election, the two major political parties both approached william jennings bryan to join them. adopted much of the people’s party’s platform. rejected the notion of both free silver and bimetallism. denounced much of the populist party’s platform.
Following the 1896 presidential election, the two major political parties both approached William Jennings Bryan to join them. William Jennings Bryan had adopted much of the people's party's platform. He had also rejected the notion of both free silver and bimetallism.
William Jennings Bryan was a prominent American politician and a member of the Democratic Party. He had contested in the 1896 presidential election from the Democratic Party.
Following the election, the two major political parties, the Democratic Party and the Republican Party, both approached him to join them. William Jennings Bryan had adopted much of the people's party's platform, which was also known as the populist party.
The people's party's platform included an eight-hour workday, the abolition of national banks, and the introduction of an income tax. William Jennings Bryan supported most of these points and wanted them to be implemented.
He had also rejected the notion of both free silver and bimetallism. Free silver is a monetary policy where the government allows the free coinage of silver into currency. Bimetallism is a monetary system where the value of a country's currency is based on the value of two metals, usually gold and silver.
William Jennings Bryan had denounced much of the populist party's platform. He had done this because he thought that some of the ideas were not practical and could not be implemented. He had also wanted to distance himself from the more radical elements of the populist party
Following the 1896 presidential election, the two major political parties both approached William Jennings Bryan to join them. William Jennings Bryan was a prominent American politician and a member of the Democratic Party. He had contested in the 1896 presidential election from the Democratic Party.
Following the election, the two major political parties, the Democratic Party and the Republican Party, both approached him to join them. William Jennings Bryan had adopted much of the people's party's platform, which was also known as the populist party. The people's party's platform included an eight-hour workday, the abolition of national banks, and the introduction of an income tax.
William Jennings Bryan supported most of these points and wanted them to be implemented. However, he had rejected the notion of both free silver and bimetallism. Free silver is a monetary policy where the government allows the free coinage of silver into currency.
Bimetallism is a monetary system where the value of a country's currency is based on the value of two metals, usually gold and silver. William Jennings Bryan believed that a gold standard was essential for the country's economic stability and had advocated for it throughout his political career.
William Jennings Bryan had denounced much of the populist party's platform. He had done this because he thought that some of the ideas were not practical and could not be implemented. He had also wanted to distance himself from the more radical elements of the populist party.
He did not want to be associated with some of the more extreme positions that the party had taken, such as nationalizing the railroads.
To learn more about presidential election
https://brainly.com/question/10679038
#SPJ11
The complete question is-
Following the 1896 presidential election, the two major political parties both approached William Jennings Bryan to join them, adopted much of the People's Party's platform, rejected the notion of both free silver and bimetallism, and denounced much of the Populist Party's platform. This situation is significant because it shows that what?
Connect Economics & History Why did New England come to depend on fishing and shipbuilding?
New England's dependence on fishing and shipbuilding stemmed from its abundant coastal resources, including fish and timber, its advantageous location for international trade, and the cultural heritage of maritime skills brought by early settlers.
Geographic Advantage: New England's coastal location provided access to rich fishing grounds, including cod, herring, and other valuable marine resources. The region's extensive coastline offered abundant opportunities for fishing, which became a vital economic activity.Natural Resources: New England possessed vast forests with ample timber, a crucial resource for shipbuilding. The availability of high-quality timber facilitated the construction of sturdy ships, supporting the growth of the shipbuilding industry.International Trade: New England's proximity to major international trade routes, particularly the Atlantic Ocean, positioned it favorably for commerce. The ships built in the region were essential for engaging in long-distance trade, facilitating the transportation of goods, such as timber, fish, and other commodities.Economic Demand: The demand for fish, both domestically and internationally, drove the development of the fishing industry in New England. The region's fish was sought after for consumption, preservation, and export to markets in Europe, the West Indies, and other colonies.Cultural Tradition: Fishing and shipbuilding became ingrained in New England's cultural identity. The early settlers, including the Puritans, brought maritime skills and traditions, further promoting the growth of these industries.Thus, the combination of favorable geography, access to resources, trade opportunities, economic demand, and cultural factors led to New England's dependence on fishing and shipbuilding.
For more such question on heritage
https://brainly.com/question/31739211
#SPJ8
human rights in the dominican republic : the 1978 presidential elections : hearing before the subcommittee on international o
The Dominican Republic, like any other country, is committed to ensuring that its citizens have their basic human rights respected and protected. In the early years of the 20th century, the country established a progressive constitution that included important human rights guarantees.
The Dominican Republic, like any other country, is committed to ensuring that its citizens have their basic human rights respected and protected. In the early years of the 20th century, the country established a progressive constitution that included important human rights guarantees.However, during the authoritarian regime of Rafael Trujillo (1930-1961), human rights were routinely violated, and political opposition was brutally repressed. After Trujillo's assassination in 1961, a transition to democracy began, culminating in the presidential elections of 1978, which were widely considered to be free and fair.In 1978, the Subcommittee on International Organizations of the US House of Representatives held a hearing on human rights in the Dominican Republic. The hearing focused on the 1978 presidential elections, which had been widely regarded as a significant step forward for democracy in the country. Witnesses included US State Department officials and representatives of various human rights organizations.The hearing highlighted the important role that international organizations can play in promoting and protecting human rights around the world. It also emphasized the need for continued vigilance in ensuring that democratic institutions and practices are maintained and strengthened in the Dominican Republic and elsewhere.International organizations such as the United Nations have played an important role in promoting and protecting human rights in the Dominican Republic and other countries around the world. By monitoring elections, providing assistance to civil society organizations, and conducting human rights investigations, these organizations have helped to ensure that governments respect the basic human rights of their citizens.
To know more about Republic visit:
https://brainly.com/question/12880388
#SPJ11
What were some of the major challenges facing the Convention?
The Constitutional Convention faced significant challenges in 1787. These included disputes over representation and state power, the divisive issue of slavery, balancing federal and state authority, designing a separation of powers, and the subsequent task of ratification.
The issues that faced the conventionThe delegates grappled with these issues and reached compromises that shaped the structure of the United States government as outlined in the Constitution.
Despite the difficulties, their efforts resulted in the creation of a lasting framework that has governed the nation for over 200 years.
Read more on Constitutional Convention here https://brainly.com/question/606222
#SPJ4
Compare In what ways did the goals of Seguín and the Americans in Texas differ?
Seguín and the Americans in Texas had various objectives that originated from their unmistakable foundations, interests, and verifiable conditions.
Political Objectives:
Seguín: As a Tejano, Seguín expected to get the freedoms and independence of the Mexican populace in Texas. He upheld the federalist cause and looked to keep up with Mexican command over the district while pushing for the privileges of Mexican Texans.
Americans in Texas: The American pioneers in Texas essentially looked to lay out an autonomous Texas republic or extension to the US. They went for the gold and the conservation of their singular freedoms and Somewhat English American social standards.
Learn more about Seguín, from:
brainly.com/question/11790756
#SPJ4
Summarize What were the benefits of the Tennessee Valley Authority?
The Tennessee Valley Authority benefits the nation's fifth-largest river by carefully managing it to decrease flood damage, make rivers easier to traverse, provide leisure, protect aquatic life, and keep the water clean.
The Tennessee Valley Authority, or TVA, is the country's largest public electricity corporation. TVA also carefully administers the nation's fifth-largest river in order to limit flood damage, improve river navigation, provide recreation, protect aquatic life, and keep the water clean. TVA contributes to the Tennessee River Valley being a desirable environment for families to live and work.
TVA is the nation's largest public power company. It is named "public" because it is owned by the United States government, as opposed to other enterprises, which are held by individuals or investors.
Learn more about Authority, here:
https://brainly.com/question/33439387
#SPJ4
Franklin purchases 40 percent of Johnson Company on January 1 for $593,600. Although Franklin did not use it, this acquisition gave Franklin the ability to apply significant influence to Johnson’s operating and financing policies. Johnson reports assets on that date of $1,589,000 with liabilities of $592,000. One building with a seven-year remaining life is undervalued on Johnson’s books by $234,500. Also, Johnson’s book value for its trademark (10-year remaining life) is undervalued by $252,500. During the year, Johnson reports net income of $172,000 while declaring dividends of $110,000. What is the Investment in Johnson Company balance (equity method) in Franklin’s financial records as of December 31?
The Investment in Johnson Company balance (equity method) in Franklin’s financial records as of December 31 is $727,960.
The equity method is an accounting method used to identify the investment income earned by an investor in a company, which is partly owned. It is generally used when the investor possesses a significant level of influence over the operations of the investee (a 20% to 50% stake) without exercising a controlling position (more than 50%).
Franklin's Investment in Johnson Company balance (equity method) in its financial records as of December 31 is calculated as follows:
On January 1, Franklin purchased 40% of Johnson Company for $593,600.
The book value of the 40% stake can be calculated as follows:
Book value = 40% x (Total assets - total liabilities)Book value = 0.4 x ($1,589,000 - $592,000
)Book value = $358,800
This acquisition gives Franklin significant influence on Johnson's operating and financing policies.
Since the building with a seven-year remaining life is undervalued on Johnson's books by $234,500, Franklin's Investment in Johnson Company would increase by $93,800 ($234,500 x 40%).
Similarly, since Johnson's book value for its trademark (10-year remaining life) is undervalued by $252,500, Franklin's Investment in Johnson Company would increase by $101,000 ($252,500 x 40%).
The investment's carrying value is now calculated as follows:
Carrying value = Purchase price + increase in carrying value
Carrying value = $593,600 + $93,800 + $101,000
Carrying value = $788,400
In the current year, Johnson reported net income of $172,000 and declared dividends of $110,000. Therefore, Franklin's share of net income is $68,800 ($172,000 x 40%), and the dividend income is $44,000 ($110,000 x 40%).
Thus, the equity method investment at the end of the year will be:
Equity method investment = Carrying value + Share of net income - Share of dividends
Equity method investment = $788,400 + $68,800 - $44,000Equity method investment = $727,960
Therefore, the Investment in Johnson Company balance (equity method) in Franklin’s financial records as of December 31 is $727,960.
To learn more about equity method, here:
https://brainly.com/question/30500983
#SPJ11
french canada: had, by 1700, twice as many colonists as all the english north american colonies combined. gave the french a world monopoly on fur production
With regard to population and the fur trade during the 17th century, French Canada, especially the colony of New France, enjoyed major advantages. By 1700, there were roughly twice as many colonists in French Canada as there were in all of the English North American colonies put together.
The economy of New France was greatly dependent on the fur trade. Alliances were formed between the French and numerous indigenous groups, especially the Huron and Algonquin, who were skilled traders and hunters. Along key rivers and waterways, such as the St. Lawrence River and the Great Lakes, the French colonists in Canada, known as habitants, built trading posts and villages. They engaged in fur trapping, trade with Native Americans, and fur export to Europe.
Learn more about The Fur Trade here:
https://brainly.com/question/14260816
#SPJ4
Your complete Question was as follows:
French Canada was a very democratic colony was founded by Jesuit priests who were working as fur traders as a way to meet and convert Native Americans consisted mainly of male colonists. had, by 1700, twice as many colonists as all the English North American colonies combined. gave the French a world monopoly on fur production.
which would be considered a secondary source about the assassination of abraham lincoln? a diary entry by a witness to the assassination an interview with a member of the audience at ford’s theater where lincoln was shot an interview with booth’s understudy, who was not at ford’s theater the night of the assassination a newspaper article written by a reporter who was in the audience at ford’s theatre
Answer:
A newspaper article written by a reporter who was in the audience at Ford's Theatre would be considered a secondary source about the assassination of Abraham Lincoln.
A secondary source is a source of information that is one step removed from the original event or period being studied. It is created after the fact, often based on primary sources, and provides interpretation or analysis of the original event.
In this case, the newspaper article was written by a reporter who was not present at the assassination but was reporting on it after the fact, based on information gathered from primary sources such as witness accounts. Therefore, it is considered a secondary source.
The other options listed in the question - a diary entry by a witness to the assassination, an interview with a member of the audience at Ford's Theatre, and an interview with Booth's understudy who was not at the theater that night - would be considered primary sources, as they are firsthand accounts of the event or period being studied.
This diagram shows the triangular trade that developed between Europe, Africa, and the Americas. In which direction did most raw materials travel?
• A. From C to B
• B. From Bto C
• C. From A to B
• D. From B to A
Answer:
c
Explanation:
from a to b. hope this helps!
Explain the significance of each of the following.
Zebulon Pike
Zebulon Pike, an American explorer, and military officer, made substantial contributions to the early 19th-century expansion of knowledge about the American West.
Zebulon Pike's exploration of the American West, his contribution to the knowledge of the area's topography and resources, and his impact on the United States' development into these regions are what make him significant. His efforts and achievements influenced the history of the country and prepared the way for further exploration, habitation, and development in the West. Curiosity and additional research were prompted by his descriptions of the area's natural riches, landscapes, and indigenous populations.
Learn more about Zebulon Pike here:
https://brainly.com/question/11280501
#SPJ4
Your Complete Question was as follows:
Explain the significance of the following.
Zebulon PikeDraw Conclusions Why did New Orleans become such an important city?
New Orleans became an important city due to its strategic location and historical significance.
Why did New Orleans become a significant city in history?New Orleans gained importance primarily because of its strategic location along the Mississippi River and its position as a major port in the Gulf of Mexico. The city served as gateway for trade and commerce connecting the vast interior of North America to international markets.
Its location made allows transportation of goods and people, facilitating economic growth and cultural exchange. Its played pivotal role in the history of the United States by serving as key battleground during the War of 1812 and later becoming a center of vibrant cultural and musical traditions.
Read more about New Orleans
brainly.com/question/18304545
#SPJ4
10. Which of the following statements is not a reason critics objected to Franklin Delano Roosevelt's New Deal reforms?
a. Critics disagreed with the attempt to put U.S. citizens back to work.
b. Some people were critical of Roosevelt's decision not to nationalize the banking system.
d. Critics believed the reforms were not radical enough.
e. Critics believed the reforms maintained too much of the old social and economic machines.
Answer:
Esteemed citizens, after careful consideration, I must advise that Option A is not a reason critics objected to Franklin Delano Roosevelt's New Deal. The other options do reflect valid critiques raised against the reforms.
Explanation:
Options B, D and E all express criticisms that the New Deal was either too conservative or did not go far enough in reforming the economic system:
• Option B cites objections to Roosevelt's decision to not fully nationalize the banking system.
• Option D expresses the view that the reforms were "not radical enough."
• Option E echoes this idea, stating critics believed the reforms "maintained too much of the old social and economic machines."
These critiques argue the New Deal should have pursued more transformative, socialist-style economic changes. In contrast, critics would not likely have objected to Roosevelt's goal of putting citizens back to work, as stated in Option A. Job creation was a main goal of the New Deal and something most Americans at the time strongly supported. Therefore, among the options given, Option A is the statement that does not reflect a valid reason critics opposed Franklin Roosevelt's New Deal reforms. The other options represent defensible critiques centered around the New Deal being too conservative or limited in scope.
Make Inferences Why did so many explorers stay close to the coastline?
Explorers of the past would often keep close to the coastline for a variety of reasons. One of the most obvious reasons was the fact that it was easier to navigate along the shoreline than to venture into the open sea where there were few landmarks or points of reference.
Explorers of the past would often keep close to the coastline for a variety of reasons. One of the most obvious reasons was the fact that it was easier to navigate along the shoreline than to venture into the open sea where there were few landmarks or points of reference. Additionally, the coastline offered a steady supply of resources like food and water that explorers could rely on. Along the way, they would encounter many different types of flora and fauna that could be useful for medicinal purposes, trade, or other purposes.
Furthermore, staying close to the coastline made it easier to establish contact with local communities. In many cases, explorers were looking for new trade routes and markets to exploit, and they knew that coastal communities would be more accessible than those located further inland. By staying close to the shoreline, they could also avoid getting lost in unfamiliar territory and encountering hostile groups of people.
Inferences: Explorers stayed close to the coastline because it was easier to navigate, provided a steady supply of resources, offered access to local communities and facilitated the establishment of new trade routes. This made it easier for them to explore and discover new places, without getting lost in unfamiliar territory or encountering hostile groups of people. It also helped them to make important connections and establish trade relations with other societies, which contributed to the development of new technologies, ideas, and cultural practices.
To know more about coastline visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31443316
#SPJ11
Draw Conclusions Which strength or weakness might have had the greatest effects?
In assessing the impact of strengths and weaknesses, it is subjective to determine which factor had the greatest effects on the attraction of American settlers to Texas. However, one could argue that the availability of land and economic opportunities had the most significant influence.
The strength of Texas's abundant land resources and the Mexican government's land grant policies provided a favorable environment for American settlers. The allure of acquiring land at low prices or for free attracted individuals seeking opportunities for agricultural development, particularly in cotton cultivation. This created a strong incentive for Americans to migrate to Texas, establish their farms or plantations, and capitalize on the growing market demand for cotton.
The economic potential of Texas, including its fertile soil, favorable climate, and abundant natural resources, offered the promise of prosperity and wealth. The opportunity to engage in large-scale agricultural production and take advantage of expanding markets drew many American settlers looking for economic opportunities and better livelihoods. The pursuit of economic gain and the desire to escape economic hardships in the United States played a significant role in motivating individuals to migrate to Texas.
While other factors such as independence, self-governance, land speculation, and the concept of Manifest Destiny were influential, it is arguable that the strength of land availability and economic opportunities had the greatest effects. These factors directly addressed the economic aspirations and needs of American settlers, providing them with tangible prospects for financial success and a better life in the new frontier of Texas.
Ultimately, the impact of strengths and weaknesses on the attraction of American settlers to Texas is complex and multifaceted. Different individuals may prioritize and interpret these factors differently based on their own perspectives and historical context.
To know more about Texas visit;
https://brainly.com/question/25723904
#SPJ4
Connect Economics & History Why was Texas a magnet for land speculators and investors?
Texas was a magnet for land speculators and investors due to several factors that combined economic and historical circumstances:
Land Availability: Texas had vast and relatively unclaimed land resources, offering opportunities for expansion and development. The Mexican government, which controlled Texas at the time, implemented policies to attract settlers, including the Mexican Colonization Law of 1823, which encouraged immigration and land grants to individuals and empresarios (agents who facilitated settlement).
Potential for Profit: The fertile soil, favorable climate, and abundant natural resources in Texas made it an attractive prospect for agricultural and resource-based industries. Investors and speculators saw the potential for profitable ventures in ranching, farming, timber, and mining, which further fueled their interest in acquiring and developing land.
Political Situation: The political instability and changing governance in Texas, including the transition from Mexican control to an independent Republic of Texas and eventual annexation by the United States, created opportunities for land speculation. The uncertainty and shifting legal frameworks allowed speculators to take advantage of changing land policies and acquire land for relatively low prices, anticipating future value appreciation.
Manifest Destiny and Westward Expansion: The concept of Manifest Destiny, the belief that it was the destiny of the United States to expand its territory from coast to coast, contributed to the allure of Texas. Investors and speculators saw Texas as a vital part of the westward expansion movement and wanted to secure land in this frontier region before it became more developed and valuable.
Economic Development and Urbanization: The growth of towns and cities in Texas, such as Houston, Galveston, and Austin, attracted investors seeking opportunities in commerce, trade, and real estate. The potential for urban development and economic growth further enticed land speculators to invest in Texas.
In summary, Texas's abundance of available land, economic potential, changing political landscape, and its association with westward expansion and Manifest Destiny made it an attractive destination for land speculators and investors seeking opportunities for profit and growth. The combination of economic and historical factors created a fertile environment that drew individuals and capital to the region.
To know more about Texas visit;
https://brainly.com/question/25723904
#SPJ4
What was the purpose of louis xiv's expansion and professionalization of the french military?
The main purpose of Louis XIV's expansion and professionalization of the French military was to centralize control over the military, create a standing army, and expand French territory.
Louis XIV aimed to centralize control over the French military. He recognized that the military played a crucial role in maintaining the power of the monarchy and he needed to have direct control over it.
To achieve this, he abolished the post of Constable of France, which had traditionally been the highest military rank in France. He also appointed a single supreme commander-in-chief, who reported directly to him.
Louis XIV created a standing army, which was a professional army composed of full-time soldiers. This was a departure from the previous system, in which the king raised an army of peasants and nobles when he needed it.
By having a standing army, Louis could maintain a large military force all year round. He also introduced a system of military training, which ensured that soldiers were well-prepared for battle.
Louis XIV expanded French territory through military conquest. He waged a series of wars throughout his reign, including the War of Devolution, the Franco-Dutch War, and the War of the League of Augsburg. These wars were costly, but they allowed France to gain territory and assert its dominance in Europe.
To learn more about French military
https://brainly.com/question/31630006
#SPJ11
The success of any project depends on the logistics for the project. In World War 2 (WW2), the Allied Forces and the German forces were engaged in battle in the Sahara Desert. The two opposing forces logistical lines had stretched over 1 500 km. The Allied forces had to push the Germans back but the Allied forces logistical line was too long and could not give enough support to the front line. On the other side the Germans were closer to their logistical line and in turn pushed back the Allied Forces until their logistical line was too stretched out to give support to their front line. This pushing forward and backward had continued for 2 years.
In view of the statement above discuss the importance of the project supply chain management.
The example of the WW2 battle in the Sahara Desert highlights the critical importance of supply chain management in any project. The success or failure of a project can be heavily dependent on the efficiency and effectiveness of its supply chain management.
In the case of the WW2 battle, both the Allied and German forces were heavily reliant on their supply chains to provide crucial resources such as food, water, ammunition, and medical supplies to their troops. The longer the supply lines, the more vulnerable they become to disruptions, delays, and attacks from enemy forces. This vulnerability can lead to a significant impact on the ability of the forces to carry out their operations effectively.
In the case of the Allied forces, their long supply line made it difficult for them to provide adequate support to their troops on the front line, which ultimately led to their defeat. On the other hand, the German forces were able to maintain a shorter supply line, allowing them to provide more effective support to their troops and ultimately leading to their victory.
Effective supply chain management involves careful planning, coordination, and execution of activities such as procurement, transportation, and inventory management. It requires a deep understanding of the project's goals, timelines, and resource requirements, as well as the ability to identify and mitigate potential risks and challenges.
In conclusion, the success of any project, whether military or civilian, depends heavily on the efficiency and effectiveness of its supply chain management. A well-managed supply chain can help ensure that the project's resources are delivered on time, on budget, and to the required specifications, while a poorly managed supply chain can lead to delays, cost overruns, and project failure.
Why did the Progressive Movement arise? (choose all that apply) Conflict between capital and labor, which sometimes escalated to violence in factory and mining towns, convinced people that some social problems could best be solved through government. Many people came to believe that government could be a way to create "a more morally perfect society" Increasingly interconnected banks and industries amplified shocks to the national economy. These frequent and prolonged downturns stressed workers and businesses, leading many to demand changes in the structure of the system that could only come through government. The nation's banking system responded quickly to the Panic of 1907 giving people confidence that financiers could be trusted.
The Progressive Movement arise Conflict between capital and labor, which sometimes escalated to violence in factory and mining towns, convinced people that some social problems could best be solved through government and other options mentioned below. So, option a, b and c is correct.
Many people came to believe that government could be a way to create "a more morally perfect society."
Increasingly interconnected banks and industries amplified shocks to the national economy.
These frequent and prolonged downturns stressed workers and businesses, leading many to demand changes in the structure of the system that could only come through government.
The option "The nation's banking system responded quickly to the Panic of 1907 giving people confidence that financiers could be trusted" does not directly relate to the reasons for the emergence of the Progressive Movement. So, option a, b and c is correct.
To learn more about Progressive Movement, here:
https://brainly.com/question/1124892
#SPJ11
Complete question:
Why did the Progressive Movement arise? (choose all that apply)
Conflict between capital and labor, which sometimes escalated to violence in factory and mining towns, convinced people that some social problems could best be solved through government.
Many people came to believe that government could be a way to create "a more morally perfect society" Increasingly interconnected banks and industries amplified shocks to the national economy.
These frequent and prolonged downturns stressed workers and businesses, leading many to demand changes in the structure of the system that could only come through government.
The nation's banking system responded quickly to the Panic of 1907 giving people confidence that financiers could be trusted.
the house committee on un-american activities was known for seeking out communists in what industry?
Answer:
In 1947, the committee held nine days of hearings into alleged communist propaganda and influence in the Hollywood motion picture industry. After conviction on contempt of Congress charges for refusal to answer some questions posed by committee members, "The Hollywood Ten" were blacklisted by the industry.
Explanation:
Answer:
In 1947, the committee held nine days of hearings into alleged communist propaganda and influence in the Hollywood motion picture industry.
In classical Athens the reforms of established the basis for Athenian democracy. Olympiakos Pisistratus Hippias Cleisthenes What did Caesar Augustus do with the Senate after he "restored the republic"? he increased the power of individual senators who supported him he made his horse head consul of the Senate he disbanded the Senate altogether because it was of no use to him he kept the Senate in place All of the following are prominent features of Greece's topography (landscape) except for: valleys extensive open plains long seacoast mountains A building designed to express ideals of reason, moderation, symmetry, and balance; but in reality it mostly showed off wealth and power of Athens. A tactic used in Athens to remove leaders who had lost the people's confidence.
Answer:
The correct answers are:
- Cleisthenes established the basis for Athenian democracy.
- Caesar Augustus kept the Senate in place after he "restored the republic."
- Extensive open plains are not a prominent feature of Greece's topography.
- A building designed to express ideals of reason, moderation, symmetry, and balance; but in reality it mostly showed off wealth and power of Athens is a Greek temple, such as the Parthenon.
- Ostracism was a tactic used in Athens to remove leaders who had lost the people's confidence.
Note: Olympiakos is the name of a Greek football club and has no relevance to the question. Pisistratus and Hippias were both ancient Athenian tyrants, but they did not establish the basis for Athenian democracy.
In a former communist country during the 1980s, name five reasons for the decrease of consumer goods in this command economy and explain how this forced saving increase consumer wealth.
During the 1980s in former communist countries, consumer goods decreased. Some of the five reasons for the decrease of consumer goods in this command economy and how this forced saving increase consumer wealth are listed below.
1. Poor quality and outdated technology: The poor quality and outdated technology of factories and equipment used in the production process were the main reasons for the decrease in consumer goods. With the lack of advanced technology and a shortage of spare parts for old machinery, production capacity slowed down, and the production of consumer goods dropped.
2. Allocation of resources: The allocation of resources in a command economy, based on the central government's priorities, was another reason for the decrease in consumer goods. The government invested more resources in the production of capital goods and the military, reducing consumer goods' output.
3. Shortage of raw materials: Another reason for the decrease in consumer goods was the shortage of raw materials. The government-controlled supply of raw materials and determined the amount of goods that could be produced, leading to the production of fewer consumer goods.
4. Limited competition: The absence of competition in the command economy reduced the incentive to increase the production of consumer goods, leading to reduced consumer goods output.
5. Poor distribution system: The poor distribution system was another reason for the decrease in consumer goods. The government-controlled the distribution of goods and rationed them, making it difficult for consumers to obtain goods.
When there are shortages, the price of goods increases. Since there was a scarcity of consumer goods, the demand increased, driving prices higher. This increase in prices enabled people to sell their goods at a higher price, leading to increased savings.
As people saved their money, they were forced to be frugal and conserve their resources. They bought only essential items, and they saved whatever money they could. This helped them to accumulate wealth over time, which they could use to buy consumer goods at a later time when they became available. As a result, forced savings, although challenging at first, eventually increased consumer wealth.
To learn more about communist countries, here:
https://brainly.com/question/30127959
#SPJ11
Complete question:
In a former communist country during the 1980s, name five reasons for the decrease of consumer goods in this command economy and explain how this forced saving increase consumer wealth?
What did the Fourteenth Amendment declare?
The Fourteenth Amendment granted citizenship and equal protection to all people born or naturalized in the United States. It also addressed representation in Congress and allowed for the federal government to intervene in cases where states were infringing on citizens’ constitutional rights.
The Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, ratified on July 9, 1868, addressed citizenship rights and equal protection under the law, prohibiting states from denying citizens life, liberty, or property without due process of law or denying them equal protection under the law. This amendment effectively made all people born or naturalized in the United States citizens and entitled to the same rights and privileges.
In addition to granting citizenship and equal protection, the Fourteenth Amendment also addressed the issue of representation in Congress. It mandated that representation in Congress would be determined by “counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed.” This meant that formerly enslaved people and their descendants would now be counted as full persons for the purpose of determining representation, instead of being counted as three-fifths of a person as they had been under the previous constitutional provisions.
This amendment also allowed Congress to enforce these provisions by passing laws that would enable the federal government to intervene in cases where states were infringing on citizens’ constitutional rights. The Fourteenth Amendment was a significant milestone in the fight for civil rights and has been used in numerous landmark Supreme Court cases to advance the cause of equality.
The Fourteenth Amendment granted citizenship and equal protection to all people born or naturalized in the United States. It also addressed representation in Congress and allowed for the federal government to intervene in cases where states were infringing on citizens’ constitutional rights. This amendment has been used in numerous landmark Supreme Court cases to advance the cause of civil rights and equality.
To learn more about ratified visit:
brainly.com/question/7828681
#SPJ11
When the king was defeated, England emerged as something of a republic with this man in charge.
A. Oliver Cromwell
B. Charles II
C. Archbishop Laud
D. Sir Elton John
When the king was defeated, England emerged as something of a republic with Oliver Cromwell as the man in charge. The correct option is A.
After the defeat and execution of King Charles I during the English Civil War, England underwent a significant political transformation. Oliver Cromwell emerged as the influential figure who took charge of the country. As the leader of the Parliamentarian forces, Cromwell played a crucial role in the overthrow of the monarchy and the establishment of the Commonwealth of England.
He assumed various titles, including Lord Protector, effectively becoming the de facto ruler of England. Cromwell's leadership marked a period of republican governance, although it was characterized by a strong central authority. While England did not become a traditional republic in the sense of a representative democracy, Cromwell's rule represented a shift away from monarchical rule and towards a more parliamentary system of governance.
The correct option is A.
To know more about Oliver Cromwell , click here.
https://brainly.com/question/30474231
#SPJ4
Which of the following statements about China's economy before 1949 is INCORRECT? a. China was the largest composition of World GDP at the beginning of 19th century. b. From 1860 to 1949 , China's economy grew annually from 4 to 10 percent. c. The 8th and 9th centuries were a period of growth and prosperity d. The Nationalists government created a coherent monetary and banking system in urban China. Which of the following statements about Great Leap Forward campaign is INCORRECT? a. The head of CCP, Chairman Liu Shaoqi, launched the campaign to reconstruct the country from an agrarian economy into a communist society through the formation of people's communes. b. Local officials were fearful of not completing the order, thus competed to fulfill or over-fulfill quotas based on exaggerated claims, collecting "surpluses" that in fact did not exist and leaving farmers to starve. c. Higher officials were too fearful to report the economic disaster caused by the campaign, and national officials, blaming bad weather for the decline in food output, and took little or no action. d. The campaign directly led to the Great Chinese Famine, which resulted in tens of millions of deaths, with estimates ranging between 18 million and 45 million deaths.
1. The 8th and 9th centuries were a period of growth and prosperity statements about China's economy before 1949 is INCORRECT.
2. Higher officials were too fearful to report the economic disaster caused by the campaign, and national officials, blaming bad weather for the decline in food output, and took little or no action statements about Great Leap Forward campaign is INCORRECT.
The eighth and ninth century saw expansion and wealth. A significant proportional gain in production resulted from the progressive migration of people from the harsh, dry farming north to the more fertile, productive south. Through the establishment of people's communes,
CCP Chairman Mao Zedong began the effort to transform the nation from an agrarian economy into a communist society. Lack of maintenance had caused the electricity, communication, and transportation systems to be damaged or deteriorate. Food output was around 30% lower than it was at its pre-war high due to agricultural disruption. Additionally, one of the most virulent inflations in recorded history added to the world's economic woes.
To learn more abut communist, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/480152
#SPJ4
Explain the significance of each of the following.
Scots-Irish
Answer:
The Scots-Irish, also known as Ulster Scots or Scotch-Irish, were a significant ethnic group with a rich historical and cultural impact.
Here are some key aspects of their significance:
Migration to America: The Scots-Irish were predominantly of Scottish and English descent but had settled in the province of Ulster in Ireland in the 17th century. Due to religious and economic factors, many Scots-Irish families emigrated to the American colonies in the 18th century, particularly during the 1700s. Their migration had a lasting impact on American history, as they became one of the largest immigrant groups in the British colonies.
Westward Expansion: The Scots-Irish played a vital role in the westward expansion of the United States. They were known for their hardiness, resilience, and self-sufficiency, making them well-suited for the challenges of frontier life. Scots-Irish settlers pushed the boundaries of settlement, establishing communities in areas such as the Appalachian Mountains, the backcountry of the Carolinas, and later expanding into the western territories. Their migration patterns and influence helped shape the cultural, social, and political landscape of these regions.
Cultural and Religious Impact: The Scots-Irish brought with them a distinct culture and heritage. They maintained strong cultural ties to their Scottish and Irish roots, preserving traditional customs, music, storytelling, and folkways. Their Presbyterian religious beliefs also played a significant role in shaping their communities, emphasizing personal piety, individual liberty, and democratic principles. These cultural and religious traits contributed to the development of a unique Scots-Irish identity and influenced the broader American culture.
Revolutionary Era: The Scots-Irish had a notable presence during the American Revolutionary War. Many Scots-Irish settlers were vocal advocates for American independence and actively participated in the conflict. Notable figures of Scots-Irish descent, such as Andrew Jackson and James Madison, played pivotal roles in the fight for independence and the establishment of the United States.
Political and Social Influence: The Scots-Irish had a lasting impact on American politics and society. Their strong individualism, distrust of centralized authority, and emphasis on personal freedoms influenced the development of American political thought and the concept of limited government. They were also known for their involvement in grassroots movements, such as the Whiskey Rebellion, and their contributions to American frontier democracy.
Evaluate What do you think is the purpose of dividing the powers between national and state governments?
The purpose of dividing the powers between national and state governments is to prevent the national government from becoming too powerful, to ensure that state governments have some degree of autonomy and control over their respective jurisdictions.
One of the significant features of the American federal system is the division of powers between the national government and state governments. The division of powers between national and state governments serves several critical objectives.
Firstly, it guarantees that the national government does not become too powerful, making it difficult for citizens to exercise their rights.
Secondly, it guarantees that state governments have some degree of autonomy and control over their respective jurisdictions.
Thirdly, it ensures that policies are designed and implemented in a more democratic manner. Additionally, it guarantees that the interests of different states are taken into account and that resources are distributed more equitably. The division of powers between the national and state governments is an essential feature of the American federal system.
The purpose of dividing the powers between national and state governments is to prevent the national government from becoming too powerful. The division of powers ensures that state governments have some degree of autonomy and control over their respective jurisdictions. It also ensures that policies are designed and implemented in a more democratic manner.
Furthermore, it guarantees that the interests of different states are taken into account and that resources are distributed more equitably. If the national government were too powerful, individual citizens would have less say in their government and be less able to hold their leaders accountable. By dividing the powers between national and state governments, citizens have more say in their government and can hold their leaders accountable.
The purpose of dividing the powers between national and state governments is to prevent the national government from becoming too powerful, to ensure that state governments have some degree of autonomy and control over their respective jurisdictions, to guarantee that policies are designed and implemented in a more democratic manner, and to ensure that the interests of different states are taken into account.
To know more about jurisdictions visit:
brainly.com/question/14179714
#SPJ11
Explain how the cotton gin changed Southern life.
Answer:
The cotton gin, invented by Eli Whitney in the late 18th century, had a profound impact on Southern life, particularly in the United States. The invention revolutionized cotton production and significantly influenced the economy, society, and even the political landscape of the Southern states. Here are some key ways in which the cotton gin changed Southern life:
Increased cotton production: The cotton gin dramatically increased the efficiency of cotton processing. Prior to its invention, separating cotton fibers from the seeds was a labor-intensive and time-consuming task. The cotton gin automated this process, allowing for the quick and efficient extraction of cotton fibers. As a result, cotton production skyrocketed, transforming the Southern United States into the leading cotton producer in the world.
Expansion of slavery: The increased demand for cotton and the need for large-scale cotton cultivation led to the expansion of slavery in the Southern states. Slavery became deeply entrenched as an economic institution due to the profitability of cotton production. The cotton gin enabled plantation owners to cultivate larger areas of land and rely more heavily on enslaved labor to meet the growing demand for cotton.
Shift to a one-crop economy: The profitability of cotton production led to a shift in the Southern economy toward a one-crop system. Many farmers and landowners focused solely on cultivating cotton, neglecting other crops and diversification. This heavy reliance on cotton made the Southern economy vulnerable to fluctuations in cotton prices and market conditions.
Westward expansion: The cotton gin played a significant role in driving westward expansion in the Southern United States. The fertile lands of the Southeast and Southwest became prime regions for cotton cultivation, leading to the expansion of cotton plantations and the displacement of indigenous peoples from their ancestral lands.
Social and political impacts: The cotton gin reinforced the institution of slavery and exacerbated racial tensions in the Southern states. Slavery became deeply intertwined with the Southern way of life, shaping social hierarchies, cultural norms, and political ideologies. The cotton industry and the wealth it generated influenced political power dynamics and played a role in debates over states' rights, eventually contributing to the tensions that led to the American Civil War.
In summary, the cotton gin revolutionized cotton production, driving the expansion of slavery, transforming the Southern economy into a one-crop system, promoting westward expansion, and leaving a lasting impact on the social and political fabric of the Southern states.
Explanation:
How does Chaucer's work signal the end of the Middle Ages and
the beginning of the Renaissance and Reformation?
Geoffrey Chaucer's work is often considered a transitional bridge between the Middle Ages and the Renaissance/Reformation period.
While it may not directly signal the end of the Middle Ages and the beginning of the Renaissance and Reformation, Chaucer's writings reflect the changing intellectual and cultural climate of the time. Here are a few ways in which Chaucer's work can be seen as indicative of this transition:
Humanism and Individualism: Chaucer's focus on individual characters and their diverse perspectives reflects a growing interest in humanistic ideals. Humanism emphasized the value of human experience, reason, and the potential for individual achievement, challenging the dominant theological and hierarchical worldview of the Middle Ages.
Vernacular Literature: Chaucer's use of Middle English instead of Latin in his works contributed to the popularization of vernacular literature. This shift marked a departure from the exclusive use of Latin in medieval intellectual and literary circles, allowing for a broader audience and a democratization of knowledge.
Realism and Secularism: Chaucer's portrayal of everyday life, social interactions, and secular themes demonstrated a departure from the strictly religious and allegorical themes prevalent in medieval literature. His characters are complex and represent various social classes, providing a more realistic depiction of human nature and society.
Critique of Church and Society: Chaucer's satirical and critical approach towards various aspects of medieval society, including the Church, clergy, and social hierarchy, reflects the growing discontent and questioning of traditional institutions that would later contribute to the Reformation movement.
While Chaucer's work doesn't directly initiate the Renaissance or Reformation, it embodies key elements that became central to these transformative periods. The Renaissance, characterized by a renewed interest in classical learning, humanism, and artistic innovation, found resonance in Chaucer's humanistic themes and focus on individuality. The Reformation, which challenged the authority and practices of the Catholic Church, was supported by Chaucer's critique of corrupt clergy and the Church's influence on society.
To learn more about Geoffrey Chaucer, here:
https://brainly.com/question/520286
#SPJ11
Did America become an imperialist county at the end of the 19th century? Secondly, and here is a loaded question: are we an imperialist country today? NATO and the Western presence in Afghanistan recently and we are basically involved in Ukraine. Is this relevant?
Yes, America became an imperialist country at the end of the 19th century. Imperialism is a political ideology that seeks to establish or maintain the power of one nation over other countries.
It's a policy of expanding the economic and political power of one country by using military force or other means to dominate other countries or regions.
There are several reasons for the U.S. becoming an imperialist country at the end of the 19th century:
1. Economic Reasons: In the late 19th century, the U.S. experienced a period of rapid industrialization. As a result, American businesses sought new markets to sell their goods.
2. Nationalism: The U.S. believed in its superiority over other countries, and it was determined to prove it by expanding its territory and influence.
3. Military Reasons: The U.S. needed to maintain a strong navy to protect its shipping lanes and maintain its status as a world power. By acquiring colonies, the U.S. could establish military bases and coaling stations around the world.
The U.S. is still considered an imperialist country today.
The U.S. has military bases in several countries around the world, and it has been involved in several conflicts in recent years, including the war in Afghanistan and the conflict in Ukraine. The U.S. has also been accused of interfering in the politics of other countries to protect its economic and strategic interests.
However, it's worth noting that there is some debate over whether the U.S. should be considered an imperialist country today, and some argue that its policies are driven more by economic interests than a desire for political domination.
To learn more about Imperialism, here:
https://brainly.com/question/30210572
#SPJ11
