Due to precedents established by other authorities, it is assumed that these will be granted. Any given governmental body can't function without these implied powers.
What are implied powers?
Implied powers are those that the federal government of the United States assumes but which are not specifically mentioned in the Constitution. Particularly, implicit powers are those that Congress may use but which are not expressly stated in the constitution of the country. Although not expressly stated in the Constitution, Congress may use whatever authorities deemed "necessary and proper" to carry out its specific duties. The United States Constitution's Article 1 is the source of the majority of these implied powers. In other words, this power gives Congress the ability to effectively lead the country as it develops. This clause was incorporated by the Constitution's initial drafters to let the government's authority evolve through time.
To learn more about implied powers visit;
https://brainly.com/question/27728796
#SPJ4
what was one technique used by black and white activists to call attention to their demands?
Bus trips through the South promoting civil rights was one of the technique used by black and white activists to call attention to their demands.
The activists used buses as the mode of transportation in order to attract attention of the government so that the civil rights of the blacks so they can get a respectable position in the society. The civil rights movement in the south broke the pattern of public facilities being segregated by race in the South and achieved the ideology of equal-rights legislation for African Americans since the reforming period. Finally the Civil Rights Act of 1964 came into being that lead to end of legal Jim Crow. It safeguarded the African Americans rights and equal access to public facilities such as restaurants, transport, offices. It also helped in breaking down the barrier at work place for women who were earlier mocked.
To know more about "civil rights" visit-
brainly.com/question/8054690
#SPJ4
according to the rule of law a government leader: a) is excluded from "we the people". b) Has absolute authority to make decisions for everyone. c) Must follow the law like everyone else.
According to the rule of law a government leader must follow the law like everyone else.
Hence. the correct option is C.
Rule of law is the mechanism or a norm that supports the equality of all citizens before the law, secures a nonarbitrary form of government, and more generally prevents the arbitrary use of power. The constitution protects persons rights and the rule of law describes constitution as the source of law, each law is derived from the constitution and it cannot override the general provisions of the constitution. The three major elements of rule of law are supremacy of law, equality to everyone before law and predominance of law i.e. court should be free from external influence.
To know more about "rule of law " visit-
brainly.com/question/12469633
#SPJ4
part ii offenses do not include group of a) vagrancy. b) dui. c) gambling.
Part II offences do not include arson. (Option D).
The Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) program has classified crimes according to their seriousness into two groups. Part I offences refer to group of serious crimes that happen on a regular basis and are likely to be reported to law enforcement. These offences include murder, assault, arson, larceny, robbery, identity theft, etc.
On the other hand, Part II offences are less serious crimes that are punishable by a fine of less than $5,000 or a prison term of less than six months. These include offences such as gambling, DUI, vagrancy, fraud, substance abuse, vandalism, disorderly conduct, embezzlement, etc. Hence, arson does not belong to the group of part II offences.
Note: The question is incomplete. The complete question probably is: Part II offences do not include a) vagrancy, b) DUI, c) gambling, d) arson.
Learn more about Part I offenses:
https://brainly.com/question/28488489
#SPJ11
as a provision of the land ordinance of 1785, (1) one lot in each township was set aside for a _____________.
As a provision of the Land Ordinance of 1785, (1) one lot in each township was set aside for a public school. This was done in order to promote education and ensure that each township had access to a school for its residents.
What is the Land Ordinance of 1785?The Land Ordinance of 1785 was an important piece of legislation that helped to organize the settlement and development of the Northwest Territory.
It established a system for surveying and dividing the land into townships, and set aside one lot in each township for the purpose of building a public school.
This provision helped to promote education and ensure that each township had access to a school for its residents.
Learn More about Land Ordinance of 1785 at https://brainly.com/question/30082465
#SPJ11
As a provision of the Land Ordinance of 1785, one lot in each township was set aside for a public school.
This was done to ensure that education was a priority in the newly formed townships and that there was land specifically designated for this purpose.
¿What is the Land Ordinance Law of 1785?The Land Ordinance of 1785 was a law passed by the United States Congress that outlined the process for dividing and selling land in the Northwest Territory.
It created a system of townships, each consisting of 36 square miles, and further divided each township into 36 one-square-mile sections.
One of these sections was set aside for the purpose of building a public school, demonstrating the importance of education in the newly formed townships.
Another question about Law in https://brainly.com/question/20585839
#SPJ11
Laws are made to protect the public as a whole from the harmful acts of others
a)criminal
b)civil
c)international
d)military
Criminal laws are made to protect the public as a whole from the harmful acts of others.
What are Criminal laws?
Criminal law is the body of legislation that establishes criminal offenses, governs the detention, accusation, and trial of suspects, and establishes the fines and forms of retribution for those found guilty.
Criminal law is just one of the tools used by organized societies to safeguard individuals' rights and guarantee the survival of the group. In addition, there are the moral principles taught by families, schools, and religion; workplace and factory rules; laws of civil life enforced by regular police powers; and the penalties accessible through tort claims.
To learn more about Criminal laws visit;
https://brainly.com/question/1205493
#SPJ4
A mayor sued a blogger for defamation in federal district court under diversity jurisdiction. The mayor alleged in her complaint that the blogger had published defamatory statements about her that suggested she was having an adulterous relationship. The mayor's entire case rested on her own testimony establishing the prima facie elements of her claim and a properly authenticated and admitted copy of the allegedly defamatory publication. At the end of the mayor's presentation of evidence to the jury, the blogger filed a motion for judgment as a matter of law. Finding that the mayor's meager evidence was insufficient for a jury reasonably to find that the publication was false, as was required by state law, the judge granted the blogger's motion and directed a judgment in favor of the blogger. The mayor immediately appealed the judgment, contending that the trial judge applied the wrong legal standard in granting the motion.
On these facts, should the judgment be set aside on appeal?
A. No, because the district court's ruling was not clearly erroneous.
B. No, because the mayor failed to meet her burden of establishing a prima facie case as a matter of law.
C. Yes, because a motion for judgment as a matter of law cannot be granted until both parties have presented their cases.
D. Yes, because the district court improperly evaluated the weight of the evidence.
Answer:Answer choice D is correct. When ruling on a Rule 50 motion for judgment as a matter of law, the court must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the opposing party and draw all reasonable inferences from the evidence in favor of the opposing party. It may not consider the credibility of witnesses or evaluate the weight of the evidence, and it must disregard all evidence favorable to the moving party that the jury is not required to believe. Therefore, on these facts, the district court improperly granted the blogger's motion, and the ruling should be set aside.
Explanation:
Answer choice A is incorrect because it states the incorrect standard to be applied when reviewing a judgment as a matter of law. Appellate review of legal rulings is de novo. The appeals court will use the trial court's record, but it reviews the evidence and law without deference to the trial court's rulings.
Answer choice B is incorrect because the mayor met this burden by testifying that the publication was false. The credibility of this testimony must be assessed by the jury.
Answer choice C is incorrect because a motion for judgment as a matter of law may be made at any time before the case is submitted to the jury.
to those who say flag burning should be illegal despite this evidence, i have a few questions. what exactly would be protected by a law that makes it illegal to burn flags? clothing featuring american flags? fourth of july picnic napkins and plates?
Flag burning in the United States ought to be forbidden and seen as abhorrent.
When Flag Burning Was Illegal?
States didn't start establishing legislation making it unlawful to burn, deface, mutilate, or otherwise disrespect the American flag until the early 20th century. The U.S. Supreme Court began challenging these regulations in 1969, initially by declaring that clauses that forbade verbal disrespect of the flag violated the First Amendment. A few years later, the Court overturned the college student's conviction for hanging an upside-down flag with a peace symbol on it. Then, in 1989, the Supreme Court ruled that burning the flag as part of a political protest qualified as "expressive action" that was protected by the constitution even if no words were used.
To learn more about flag burning visit;
https://brainly.com/question/8992381
#SPJ4
many jurisdictions/organizations configure their eocs using the standard______
The common ICS-organizational structure is used by many governments and organizations to set up their EOCs. Many people are familiar with the structure, and it fits with how incidents are organized on the scene.
For the purpose of managing major incidents, ICS jurisdictions establishes five functional areas: command, operations, planning, logistics, and finance/administration. The organizational structure is never greater than necessary since the Span-of-Control recommendations are strictly observed.
Only the roles and responsibilities required to complete the incident's objectives should be included in an ICS organizational structure. It is possible to merge ICS positions to save staffing costs or boost productivity. A standardized, on-scene, all-risk event management concept is the Incident Command System, or ICS.
To accommodate the complexity and requirements of a single or series of occurrences, ICS enables its users to establish an integrated organizational structure.
Learn more about jurisdictions Visit: brainly.com/question/10377896
#SPJ4
Which of the following is a disadvantage for a
private investigator of having an attorney as a
client?
What are the four 4 elements of negligence?
The four elements of negligence in the individuals within an organization, include,
breach of dutyduty of carecausation, and damagesThe negligence is an element that can be referred to or considered as the one wherein the utmost mistake and erroneous behavior of an individual is being defined and identified. Thus, more often than not, an individual must try not to commit to any of the four elements of negligence in an organizational environment that have been provided above to stay aware of the consequences.
Learn more about negligence here:
https://brainly.com/question/12177947
#SPJ4
What Does the Fourth Amendment Mean?
Please read this case and answer the questions attached.
While a summary judgment motion is not a substitute for trial, it is a tool that allows courts to weed out cases that do not need a trial to be resolved.
If Taco bell won summary judgement in its favour what would happen to Wrench's case?
Taco Bell Corp. (Defendant) and Wrench, LLC (Plaintiff) discussed the potential use of Plaintiff's "Psycho Chihuahua" cartoon character. Plaintiff filed a lawsuit after Defendant started running commercials featuring a chihuahua, alleging Defendant had broken an implied-in-fact contract.
Pizza Hut was substituted for Taco Bell in several non-American releases because the former was at the time virtually unknown in many other nations. This includes dubbing and branding modifications made in post-production. In the end credits, Taco Bell is still mentioned.
Wrench filed a lawsuit in district court against Taco Bell, alleging, among other things, charges of unfair competition, conversion, misappropriation, and implied contract breach. The district court partially granted and partially rejected Taco Bell's move for dismissal.
To learn more on summary judgment from the link:
https://brainly.com/question/1396036
#SPJ1
Why do you think the Strategic Defense Initiative was controversial?
Answer: The Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI) was controversial because it suggested the potential for the United States to develop a space-based missile defense system. This system would have been capable of shooting down ballistic missiles, potentially giving the US an incredibly powerful advantage in nuclear warfare. The concern was that such a system could lead to an arms race, as other countries would feel the need to develop their own missile defense systems in order to compete on a level playing field. Additionally, the cost of developing such a system was seen as prohibitively expensive, as well as potentially leading to a destabilization of the balance of power.
Explanation: The choice of words in the paragraph was meant to emphasize the potential consequences of the Strategic Defense Initiative. By describing the system as "potentially giving the US an incredibly powerful advantage in nuclear warfare" and as "potentially leading to an arms race," it highlights the potential risks of developing such a system. By mentioning the cost of developing such a system and the potential for destabilization of the balance of power, it further emphasizes the potential dangers of the SDI.
Answer:
The Strategic Defense Initiative, also known as "Star Wars," was a controversial program proposed by U.S. President Ronald Reagan in the 1980s. The program aimed to develop a system of space-based missiles and lasers to protect the U.S. from incoming enemy missiles.
There were several reasons why the Strategic Defense Initiative was controversial:
Cost: The program was expected to be extremely expensive, and many people believed that the funds would be better spent on other programs such as education, healthcare, and social security.
Effectiveness: There were questions about the feasibility and reliability of the technology proposed for the program, and many experts believed that a missile defense system would not be effective in stopping a large-scale attack.
Arms race: The Strategic Defense Initiative was seen by some as an attempt by the U.S. to gain a military advantage over the Soviet Union, which would lead to an arms race and increase tensions between the two countries.
International opposition: The program was widely opposed by many countries around the world, who saw it as a threat to global stability and a potential trigger for a new arms race.
Ethical and legal concerns: Some people believed that the development and deployment of a missile defense system would violate international laws and treaties, and raise ethical concerns about the use of space for military purposes.
Explanation:
These and other factors made the Strategic Defense Initiative a highly controversial program that sparked intense debate and opposition both in the U.S. and internationally.
just tell me if you kinda confuse
ALLEN
In response to growing concerns about the overcrowding of landfills with scrap metal, Congress passed a statute requiring all unwanted vehicles to be disposed of at federally licensed auto-recycling facilities. These facilities were able to recycle more components of vehicles than most other recycling facilities. However, due to the high operating costs of these facilities, the cost of disposing the vehicles was much higher than the cost of disposing them at general purpose recycling facilities. A state wants to dispose of its fleet of decommissioned trucks at a state-operated recycling facility. However, this facility is not federally licensed. Is the state permitted to dispose of its decommissioned trucks at the state-operated facility?
Answers:
No, because the federal statute was passed pursuant to Congress's power to legislate for the general welfare.
No, because the federal statute regulates interstate commerce.
Yes, because the market-participant exception applies.
Yes, because there is a presumption against preemption in an area governed by the state's police power.
No, the state is not permitted to dispose of its decommissioned trucks at the state-operated facility because the federal statute requires all unwanted vehicles to be disposed of at federally licensed auto-recycling facilities.
The federal statute was enacted under Congress's jurisdiction to legislate for the general welfare, and it governs the disposal of unwanted automobiles in order to address concerns about landfill congestion. The market-participant exception, which permits a state to favour its own products or services while acting as a market player, does not applicable in this case because the state is operating as a regulator rather than a market participant. Furthermore, because the federal Act was passed under the Trade Clause, which provides Congress the right to regulate interstate commerce, there is no presumption against preemption in an area covered by the state's police power.
For such more question on federally:
https://brainly.com/question/4503841
#SPJ4
How many Supreme Court justices are Republican?
how much did bp pay for deepwater horizon oil spill?
In order to resolve civil damages claims brought by the United States as a result of the Deepwater Horizon oil disaster, BP has been ordered to pay $5.5 billion. The sum will be paid over a period of sixteen years.
In spite of objections from Congress and a sizable coalition of environmental organizations, the final agreement will permit BP to write off the majority of the expenses as regular business expenses.
Lukas Ross, a campaigner with Friends of the Earth on climate and energy, said: "We are horrified to see that BP's egregious carelessness continues to enjoy government subsidies. It is absurd to consider the worst oil disaster in American history to be a routine and essential business expense.
To learn more about deepwater horizon oil spill visit;
https://brainly.com/question/9760994
#SPJ4
The Smith system does not include
Hope it helps
An advantage of the separation of ownership from management in corporations is that the company can raise money from investors but the investors:____________
Businesses can raise capital from investors without those investors getting involved in day-to-day management, which is one advantage of corporations having separate ownership and management.
What are investors?An investor is a person who invests money with the hope of making a profit or gaining an advantage in the future (interest).
The majority of the time, the investor purchases some kind of property using these assigned funds.
Equity, debt, securities, real estate, infrastructure, money, commodities, tokens, derivatives like put and call options, futures, and forwards are a few examples of investment types.
One benefit of corporations having ownership and management distinct from one another is that businesses can raise capital from investors without those investors getting involved in day-to-day management.
Therefore, businesses can raise capital from investors without those investors getting involved in day-to-day management, which is one advantage of corporations having separate ownership and management.
Know more about investors here:
https://brainly.com/question/25311149
#SPJ1
a decision on a question of state law is final when:_____.
The certification of questions of law procedure can provide federal courts with clear and definitive answers, promote uniformity, prevent forum shopping, and guarantee that state high courts have the final say on state law.
In which court is the decision of the court always final?The court of appeals' decision often serves as the final word in the matter, unless it remands the case to the trial court for further proceedings or the parties petition the U.S. Supreme Court to take the case. The court's ruling is the final determination on the matter. Should the defendant be found guilty, they are free to appeal the matter to the district court.
When can a final judgment becomes final?When the appeals time has passed, the sentence has been completed in full or in part, or the defendant has expressly waived his right to appeal in writing, the judgement in a criminal matter is considered final.
To know more about federal courts visit: brainly.com/question/1384353
#SPJ1
According to Chapter 9 of americas courts and the criminal justice system, what inroads has the victims’ rights movement made regarding changes in the criminal justice system and process? Victim assistance and victim compensation programs are well established in many jurisdictions, but are they enough to compensate victims for their losses?
According to Chapter 9 of "America's Courts and the Criminal Justice System," the victims' rights movement has made significant inroads in terms of changes in the criminal justice system and process. One of the key changes brought about by the victims' rights movement is the recognition of the rights of crime victims, including the right to be informed about their case, the right to be heard in court, and the right to receive protection from further harm.
Victim assistance and victim compensation programs have been established in many jurisdictions to help compensate victims for their losses. These programs provide financial and other support to crime victims to help them recover from the emotional and financial toll of crime. However, these programs are not always enough to fully compensate victims for their losses.
In some cases, victims may still face significant financial losses, including lost wages, medical expenses, and property damage. Furthermore, the emotional toll of crime can be long-lasting and difficult to quantify, making it difficult to compensate victims for their losses.
Despite these challenges, the victims' rights movement has made important progress in recognizing the rights and needs of crime victims and in providing support and compensation to help them recover from the impact of crime. However, much work remains to be done to ensure that all crime victims are adequately compensated for their losses and that the criminal justice system is fully responsive to the needs of victims.
Because a donee beneficiary is merely receiving a gift, a donee beneficiary cannot win a lawsuit if the contract is not performed. True or False?
The given statement is false. Because a donee beneficiary is merely receiving a gift, a donee beneficiary cannot win a lawsuit if the contract is not performed.
What Is a Donee Beneficiary?
The donee beneficiary differs from other categories of third-party beneficiaries because of their connection to the contract's parties. Specifically, a donee beneficiary's claim to receive benefits under the contract is treated as a gift from one of the parties to the contract. In the case of a 5 by 5 Power in Trust, donee beneficiaries are also permitted to incorporate the promised assets into their own inheritance.
Donee Beneficiaries have the legal right to request benefits promised to them once their rights to the contract have accrued, just like in other circumstances involving third-party beneficiaries. They differ from creditor beneficiaries in that they may bring legal action only after being made aware of the contracts or intended benefits.
To learn more about donee beneficiary visit;
https://brainly.com/question/30666977
#SPJ4
what type of verdict allows a judge to find for the defendant immediately after the plaintiff has presented his or her case?
Directed verdict allows a judge to find for the defendant immediately after the plaintiff has presented his or her case.
Directed verdict is a order by the court or jury because the facts proven are undisputable, or the plaintiff failed to produce relevant evidences. The test applied for a direct verdict includes based on whether or not there is any evidence either direct or indirect, upon which a jury, properly instructed, could reasonably convict. When the jury leaves the courtroom, the defendant's lawyer in a civil case has the option of making a motion for a directed verdict, arguing that his or her client's liability has not been proven by a preponderance of the evidence. Directed verdicts are not very common in use.
To know more about "Directed verdict" visit-
brainly.com/question/15105356
#SPJ4
Think about the possibility of removing prisoners’ rights while they are incarcerated. What rights would you take away and why? What rights (if any) would you add and why?
The possibility of removing prisoners’ rights while they are incarcerated is the right to vote and privacy as they are not considered ideal citizens involved in criminal offenses.
Why rights are granted?In a country, the basic right is granted by the constitution in order to ensure the well-being of its citizens as well as avoid misuse of power by the administration as citizens will raise their voices through their rights.
As Prisoners are referred to as individuals who involve in criminal offenses and bearing their punishment so the right the vote should be eliminated as their contribution will not be impactful for the country's growth.
The rights of well-being will be added where they can ask for medical assistance in prisons.
Learn more about individual rights, here:
https://brainly.com/question/2867332
#SPJ1
Many experts believe that using a quasi-military model for police work can help to cultivate an “us versus them” attitude that can result in the mistreatment of citizens.
which amendments address the rights of the accused? a) The fourth amandement. b) The fifth amandement. c) The sixth amandement. d) The seventh amandement
The sixth amendment of the constitution of United States address the rights of the accused.
Hence, the correct option is C.
The amendment was ratified in houses in the year 1791 by the required three-fourths majority of states, and the 6th amendment of the constitution of United States protects the rights of the criminal defendants or accused. It includes the right to a public trial without unnecessary delay, the right to a lawyer, the right to an impartial jury, and the right to know about accused and the nature of the charges and evidence against the accused. It addresses an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed.
To know more about "sixth amendment" visit-
brainly.com/question/3044508
#SPJ4
the power of the national government to coin money is ________
The power of the national government to coin money is an expressed power. A national government is a political power that rules over a whole country.
What is a national government?
A national government must have a national army, sufficient control over its states or provinces to establish and uphold a foreign policy, and the capacity to levy taxes, at the very least. The Confederacy during the American Civil War was an example of a loose confederation of states, but a national government can also be anything else. Federal and unitary governments are the two major types of national governments.
States or provinces have little to no influence under a unitary administration, which is centralized.The responsibilities are switched in a federal government. The national government is merely given enough power to function, with the majority of power resting with the states.To learn more about national government visit;
https://brainly.com/question/28826393
#SPJ4
Refer to your Who is Sonia Sotomayor? book for a complete version of this text.
Part A
Where can readers find more information about the job of a Supreme Court justice?
A. an illustration of the judges in Chapter 9
B. a text box in Chapter 9
C. an illustration of Sonia and a judge in Chapter 9
D. a text box in Chapter 7
Part B
How does the feature identified in Part A contribute to readers’ understanding of the topic?
A. It depicts a swearing-in ceremony showing that justices must take an oath to serve.
B. It compares local and federal U.S. courts and their functions.
C. It shows justices in the robes they wear in court to convey authority and fairness.
D. It shows justices in the robes they wear in court to convey authority and fairness.
In a text box in Chapter 9 readers find more information about the job of a Supreme Court justice and It depicts a swearing-in ceremony showing that justices must take an oath to serve. The correct options are B and A respectively.
Who is Sonia Sotomayor?Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court Sonia Sotomayor. In 2009, after President Barack Obama's nomination and confirmation, she joined the Supreme Court as the third woman and first Hispanic.
Readers can get more information about a Supreme Court justice's duties in a text box in Chapter 9, which also features a picture of a ceremony where justices are sworn in to their positions.
Thus, the correct options are B and A respectively.
For more details regarding Sonia Sotomayor, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14495765
#SPJ1
the following is information that should be taken into consideration when making suitable recommendations concerning the purchase of insurance, except:
Out of the choices of alternatives provided above, it may be stated that education is the factor that should not be taken into consideration wherein there is a need of making suitable and apt recommendations related to the insurance policies being purchased. Therefore, the option D holds true.
Education is the aspect that does not concern the insurance being purchased by an individual. Also, it is also to be stated that the individuals having more or less education do not have an influence over the price of the premium of the insurance, and hence, are best not taken into consideration.
Learn more about insurance here:
https://brainly.com/question/27822778
#SPJ4
The following is information that should be taken into consideration when making suitable recommendations concerning the purchase of insurance, EXCEPT:
a. financial time horizon
b. annual income
c. tax status
d. education
how do certifying officers ensure system integrity?
Certifying officers are required to carry out a number of actions to ensure system integrity. They must first determine which aspects of the system are crucial to its proper operation.
Second, they must create methods and tests to determine whether these vital features are present and operating as intended.
Thirdly, they need to keep an eye on the system throughout time to make sure it keeps working properly. Finally, if any issues are found, they must take corrective action. The VA will reverse its initial rejection of benefits and grant them to the veteran if the certifying officer can convincingly refute the presumption of carelessness.
To learn more about Certifying officers visit;
https://brainly.com/question/30245424
#SPJ4
how long after certifying for unemployment will i get paid california?
Most qualified workers receive payment for their unemployment benefits after at least three weeks of processing their claim.
You'll get a debit card in the mail when your first benefit payment becomes available. You can track, use, and transfer your benefit payments once the card has been activated. You should maintain your card until it expires because it is utilized for all EDD benefit programs and is good for three years from the day it is issued.
You will get your benefit payments on that debit card if you have previously received Unemployment Insurance, Disability Insurance, or Paid Family Leave benefits there. Once funds are available, a replacement card will be automatically delivered to you if your old one has expired.
To learn more about unemployment benefits, please refer:
https://brainly.com/question/15996298
#SPJ4
