Why is it easier to show that a set of requirements is inconsistent rather than prove that they are consistent

In order to determine if there is inconsistency, the data collected from the three instructors would need to be compared and analyzed. Without further information or analysis, it is difficult to determine if there is inconsistency in the grading.

To answer your question, we first need to analyze the data provided for the grade distribution of the three instructors. Unfortunately, you haven't provided any data in your question. However, I can guide you through the process of assessing consistency using the given terms: conducted, assess, and consistency.

Step 1: The university conducted a study on the grade distribution of a multi-section basic statistics course taught by three instructors.

Step 2: To assess consistency in grading, we need to compare the grade distributions of the three instructors. You can use a variety of statistical methods to make this comparison, such as descriptive statistics (e.g., mean, median, and standard deviation), visual representations (e.g., boxplots or histograms), or inferential statistics (e.g., ANOVA or chi-square tests).

Step 3: After analyzing the data, you can determine whether there is any inconsistency in grading among the three instructors. If the grade distributions are similar, it suggests consistency in grading. However, if the distributions differ significantly, it may indicate grading inconsistency.

Remember, to provide a specific answer, we would need the actual data on grade distribution for the three instructors. Once you have that data, you can follow the steps mentioned above to assess the consistency of grading in the course.

to learn more about histograms click here:

brainly.com/question/16819077

#SPJ11

In this example, the area of the sails of the scale model would be 1.025 SI units

To determine the area of the sails of the scale model, you'll first need to know the scale ratio between the real Lady Washington and the model.

A scale ratio is expressed as a fraction, such as 1:20, which means that 1 unit on the model represents 20 units on the real object.

Once you have the scale ratio, you'll need to apply the square of this ratio to the area of the sails of the real Lady Washington. For example, if the scale ratio is 1:20, then the ratio for the area calculation will be (1/20)^2, or 1/400.

Now, simply multiply the area of the real sails (410 SI units) by the square of the scale ratio. Using the 1:20 example, you'd calculate:

410 SI units * (1/400) = 1.025 SI units.

. Remember to replace the scale ratio with the actual ratio provided for your specific question.

To learn more about ratio click here

brainly.com/question/13419413

#SPJ11

The total cost for Cara is $15,756.86

Given that, Cara leased a convertible by making a $3,000 deposit and paying $349 per month for 36 months, and an $80 title fee and a $112.86 license fee.

We need to find the total lease cost.

(36x349) +3000+80+112.86

= $15,756.86

Hence, the total leased cost is $15,756.86.

Learn more about leasing, click;

https://brainly.com/question/29216664

#SPJ1

The point that symbolizes the shared point of various sets is the intersection of sets.

The intersection of sets A and B is represented by region II.

We deduce from the query that sets A and B share a set element at II.

This means that Region II is the intersection of both sets.

Hence, the region that represents the intersection of sets A and B is II.

Read more about set intersections at:

brainly.com/question/6779867

#SPJ1

In the context of measurement, accuracy and precision refer to two related but distinct concepts. Accuracy is the degree to which a measurement is close to the true value of what is being measured, while precision is the degree to which repeated measurements of the same quantity are close to each other.

The uncertainty of a measurement refers to the degree of doubt or lack of confidence in the result obtained from a measuring instrument. It is typically represented by an interval around the measured value that indicates the range within which the true value is likely to lie.

The accuracy of a measuring device is related to its ability to provide measurements that are close to the true value. If a measuring device is highly accurate, then its measurements will be close to the true value, and the uncertainty associated with those measurements will be relatively small. On the other hand, if a measuring device is not very accurate, then its measurements may be far from the true value, and the uncertainty associated with those measurements will be relatively large.

The precision of a measuring device is related to its ability to provide measurements that are close to each other when measuring the same quantity repeatedly. A measuring device that is highly precise will give measurements that are very close to each other, and the uncertainty associated with those measurements will be relatively small. Conversely, a measuring device that is not very precise will give measurements that are far apart, and the uncertainty associated with those measurements will be relatively large.

for such more question on Accuracy

https://brainly.com/question/23748575

#SPJ11

According to the flood recurrence interval equation, a flood that occurs in 2021, after 149 years of record keeping, and is the third largest ever recorded has a recurrence interval of approximately 50 years.

The flood recurrence interval equation is a statistical method used to estimate the likelihood of a flood of a certain magnitude occurring in any given year. It is based on historical records of floods and takes into account the size and frequency of floods that have occurred in the past.

In this case, the flood that occurred in 2021 is the third largest ever recorded. Based on the historical records of floods over the past 149 years, this flood has a recurrence interval of approximately 50 years. This means that there is a 2% chance of a flood of this magnitude occurring in any given year.

It is important to note that the flood recurrence interval equation is not a perfect predictor of future floods. It is only an estimation based on historical records. Other factors such as climate change and changes in land use can also impact the likelihood and severity of floods.

In conclusion, the recurrence interval for a flood that occurred in 2021, after 149 years of record keeping and is the third largest ever recorded is approximately 50 years. However, it is important to remember that the accuracy of this estimation may vary based on several factors.

To learn more about  interval equation, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/12165844#

#SPJ11

Jose purchased 35  $0.43 stamps and 90 $0.03 stamps.

Using Algebra, Let's let x be the number of $0.43 stamps and y be the number of $0.03 stamps. We know from the problem that:

y = 2x + 20 (the number of $0.03 stamps is 20 more than twice the number of $0.43 stamps)

We also know that the total amount paid for the stamps was $17.75. The amount paid for $0.43 stamps is 0.43x and the amount paid for $0.03 stamps is 0.03y. So we can write:

0.43x + 0.03y = 17.75

Now we can substitute y = 2x + 20 into the second equation and simplify:

0.43x + 0.03(2x + 20) = 17.75

0.43x + 0.06x + 0.6 = 17.75

0.49x = 17.15

x = 35

So Jose bought 35 $0.43 stamps. We can find the number of $0.03 stamps by using y = 2x + 20:

y = 2(35) + 20 = 90

So Jose bought 90 $0.03 stamps.

In summary, Jose purchased 35 $0.43 stamps and 90 $0.03 stamps for a total cost of $17.75.

Know more about algebra here:

https://brainly.com/question/11701178

#SPJ11

Instantaneous voltage equation: v = X(1 - e^(-t/Y))
X = 11
Y = 1

a) Differentiate v with respect to t to give an equation for dv/dt:

Using the chain rule and the fact that the derivative of e^(ax) is a*e^(ax), we get:

dv/dt = X * (-1/Y) * e^(-t/Y) = -11/Y * e^(-t/Y)

Since Y = 1:

dv/dt = -11 * e^(-t)

b) Calculate the value of dv/dt at t = 2s and t = 4s:

For t = 2s:
dv/dt = -11 * e^(-2) ≈ -11 * 0.135 = -1.485

For t = 4s:
dv/dt = -11 * e^(-4) ≈ -11 * 0.018 = -0.198

c) Find the second derivative (d^2v/dt^2):

To find the second derivative, we differentiate dv/dt once more:

d^2v/dt^2 = d/dt(-11 * e^(-t)) = 11 * e^(-t)

In summary:

a) dv/dt = -11 * e^(-t)
b) At t = 2s, dv/dt ≈ -1.485; at t = 4s, dv/dt ≈ -0.198
c) d^2v/dt^2 = 11 * e^(-t)

To learn more about chain rule : brainly.com/question/28972262

#SPJ11

Answer: 9.01 is the answer

Step-by-step explanation: Because when you add the number in the square you can split the number you add to the nearest sum to the number you get in the outcum.

Grace's skillset includes the ability to tie a square knot and operate an automobile with a standard transmission. These abilities demonstrate her proficiency in manual tasks and mechanical knowledge.

It is important to note that these skills may not be relevant in all situations, but they can be useful in specific circumstances. For example, the square knot may be used in camping or boating, while the standard transmission automobile may be preferred by some drivers for its greater control and fuel efficiency.

Overall, Grace's skills highlight her versatility and adaptability in various settings. A square knot is a secure, binding knot used in various applications, while a standard transmission refers to a manual gearbox in an automobile, requiring the driver to change gears manually. Both of these skills showcase her adaptability and competence in diverse area.

To know more about area click here

brainly.com/question/13194650

#SPJ11

The probability that a randomly chosen string of seven hexadecimal digits has at least one repeated digit is approximately 1 - ((16 * 15 * 14 * 13 * 12 * 11 * 10) / 16^7).

The probability that a randomly chosen string of seven hexadecimal digits has at least one repeated digit can be calculated using the concept of probability. There are a total of 16 possible characters in hexadecimal system (0-9 and A-F) and for each of the seven digits, there are 16 possible choices. Therefore, there are a total of 16^7 possible strings of seven hexadecimal digits.

To calculate the probability of having at least one repeated digit, we need to calculate the number of strings that have no repeated digits and subtract it from the total number of possible strings.

The number of strings with no repeated digits can be calculated as follows:

- For the first digit, there are 16 possible choices
- For the second digit, there are 15 possible choices (since one digit has already been chosen)
- For the third digit, there are 14 possible choices
- And so on, until the seventh digit, for which there are 10 possible choices (since six digits have already been chosen)

Therefore, the number of strings with no repeated digits is:

16 x 15 x 14 x 13 x 12 x 11 x 10

To calculate the probability of having at least one repeated digit, we need to subtract this number from the total number of possible strings and divide by the total number of possible strings:

1 - (16 x 15 x 14 x 13 x 12 x 11 x 10) / (16^7)

This gives us the probability that a randomly chosen string of seven hexadecimal digits has at least one repeated digit.

to learn more about probability click here:

brainly.com/question/29221515

#SPJ11

Buying from Value World would cost Binita £0.72 less (in pounds) than buying from Letters2go.

To compare the costs of envelopes from both shops, we need to calculate the price per envelope.

At Letters2go, the price per envelope is:

3.29 pounds / 25 envelopes = 0.1316 pounds per envelope

At Value World, the price per envelope is:

(1.95 pounds * 2 packs) / (10 envelopes * 2 packs + 1 free pack) = 0.1300 pounds per envelope

So the price per envelope at Value World is slightly less than the price per envelope at Letters2go.

To buy 450 envelopes, Binita would need to purchase:

18 packs of 25 envelopes at Letters2go (18 x 25 = 450 envelopes)

45 packs of 10 envelopes at Value World (45 x 10 = 450 envelopes)

At Letters2go, the cost of 18 packs of 25 envelopes would be:

18 packs x £3.29 per pack = £59.22

At Value World, the cost of 45 packs of 10 envelopes (with 15 packs being free) would be:

30 packs x £1.95 per pack = £58.50

Therefore, buying from Value World would cost Binita £59.22 - £58.50 = £0.72 less than buying from Letters2go.

Correct Question :

Binita is going to buy 450 envelopes.

Here is some information about the cost of envelopes in two shops,

Letters2go : Pack of 25 envelopes for £3.29

Value World : Pack of 10 envelopes for £1.95, Buy 2 packs get 1 pack free

How much less, in pounds (£), will it cost Binita to buy the envelopes from Value World.

To learn more about pounds here:

https://brainly.com/question/29180665

#SPJ1

Answer:  How do you know how many solutions an equation has?

If solving an equation yields a statement that is true for a single value for the variable, like x = 3, then the equation has one soluti

Step-by-step explanation:

we need to first calculate the deviation of a GPA less than 1.85 from the mean GPA of 2.3, Deviation = 1.85 - 2.3 = -0.45 Next, we need to calculate the z-score for this deviation using the formula: z = (x - μ) / σ .

where x is the value we want to convert to a z-score, μ is the population mean, and σ is the population standard deviation. z = (-0.45 - 2.3) / 0.7 = -3.07, We can use a z-score table or calculator to find the percentage of the population that falls below this z-score.

According to the table, the percentage of the population with a z-score less than -3.07 is approximately 0.001. Therefore, the percentage of students who will be dropped from college is approximately 0.1% (or 0.001 x 100).
The Z-score formula is: Z = (X - μ) / σ.

Where X is the GPA value (1.85), μ is the mean (2.3), and σ is the standard deviation (0.7). Z = (1.85 - 2.3) / 0.7 = -0.64
Now, we'll use the standard normal distribution table to find the percentage of students corresponding to a Z-score of -0.64. The table gives us a value of 0.2611.Thus, approximately 26.11% of the students with a GPA less than 1.85 will be dropped from college.

To know more about value click here

brainly.com/question/30760879

#SPJ11

The value of the given integral is 68.

We know that the average value of the function f on the interval [2,6] is 3. Therefore, we can write:

[tex](1/(6-2)) \times \int 2^6 f(x) dx = 3[/tex]

Simplifying, we get:

[tex](1/4) \times \int 2^6 f(x) dx = 3[/tex]

Multiplying both sides by 4, we get:

[tex]\int 2^6 f(x) dx = 12[/tex]

Now, we can use this result to evaluate the given integral:

[tex]\int 2^6 (5f(x) + 2) dx\\= 5 \int 2^6 f(x) dx + 2 \int 2^6 dx[/tex]

= 5 × 12 + 2 × (6 - 2)    (using the value of the previous integral)

= 60 + 8

= 68

Therefore, the value of the given integral is 68.

for such more question on integral

https://brainly.com/question/22008756

#SPJ11

The  sum of the series is -800.

The given series [infinity]∑k=1 9k(k+2) diverges.

To see why, we can use the divergence test. The divergence test states that if the limit of the terms of a series does not approach zero, then the series diverges.

In this case, let's look at the limit of the terms of the series:

lim k → ∞ 9k(k+2)

We can see that this limit approaches infinity as k approaches infinity, since the growth rate of k(k+2) is greater than that of 9k. Therefore, the series diverges.

As for the second series, [infinity]∑n=0(−1)n4n−3(2n+1)!, it converges.

To see why, we can use the ratio test. The ratio test states that if the limit of the ratio of consecutive terms is less than 1, then the series converges absolutely.

Let's apply the ratio test to our series:

|(-1)^(n+1) 4^(n+1) (2n+3)! / (4^n (2n+1)!)| = |(-1)^(n+1) (2n+3)(2n+2)/(4(2n+1)(2n+2))|

= |(-1)^(n+1) (2n+3)/(4(2n+1))|

As n approaches infinity, the absolute value of this ratio approaches 1/2, which is less than 1. Therefore, the series converges absolutely.

To find the sum of the series, we can use the formula for the sum of an alternating series:

S = a1 - a2 + a3 - a4 + ...

where a1 = 4!/1!, a2 = 4^3(3!) / (2!) and so on.

Plugging in the values, we get:

S = 4! - (4^3)(3!) / (2!) + (4^5)(5!) / (4!) - (4^7)(7!) / (6!) + ...

Simplifying each term, we get:

S = 24 - 96 + 384 - 1792 + ...

S = -800

Therefore, the sum of the series is -800.

Visit to know more about Series:-

brainly.com/question/26263191

#SPJ11

We can reject the null hypothesis at a 5% significance level (α=0.05), since the p-value is less than α.

To find the p-value for the given t-test, we need to look up the t-distribution table with 17 degrees of freedom (df). Since this is a two-tail test, we need to find the area in both tails of the t-distribution that corresponds to a t-value of 2.5 (and the negative of -2.5).

Looking up the t-distribution table with 17 df, we find that the critical t-value at a 5% significance level (α/2) is approximately ±2.110. Since our test statistic t=2.5 falls outside this critical value, the p-value will be less than 0.05.

To find the exact p-value, we can use a t-distribution calculator or statistical software. For a two-tailed t-test with 17 degrees of freedom and a test statistic of t=2.5, the p-value is approximately 0.021. Therefore, we can reject the null hypothesis at a 5% significance level (α=0.05), since the p-value is less than α.

To learn more about statistic  here

https://brainly.com/question/15525560

#SPJ4

Some of the most common symbols used in formulas include (addition), - (subtraction), * (multiplication), and / (division). These are called "operators". The correct option is c) operators.

Operators are symbols that represent a specific operation to be performed on one or more values or variables. In mathematics and programming, operators are used to build expressions that represent calculations. The most common operators include addition (+), subtraction (-), multiplication (*), and division (/), which are used to perform basic arithmetic operations.

Other operators include exponents (^), modulus (%), and comparison operators (>, <, =, etc.), which are used for more complex operations. Understanding operators is an essential part of learning mathematics and programming, as they form the building blocks for more complex calculations and algorithms. The correct option is c) operators.

The complete question is:

Fill in the blank: Some of the most common symbols used in formulas include + (addition), - (subtraction), * (multiplication), and / (division). These are called _____.

a) references

b) domains

c) operators

d) counts

For more about operators:

https://brainly.com/question/30340325

#SPJ4

The probability that the sample mean would differ from the true mean by less than 5.4 months is approximately 1.0000 or 100%.

We are given the following information:

1. The mean life of a television set (µ) is 138 months.
2. The variance (σ²) is 324 months.
3. We have a sample of 83 televisions (n).
4. We want to find the probability that the sample mean (X) differs from the true mean by less than 5.4 months.

First, let's find the standard deviation (σ) by taking the square root of the variance:
σ = √324 = 18 months

Next, we'll find the standard error (SE) using the formula SE = σ / √n:
SE = 18 / √83 ≈ 1.974

Now, let's find the Z-score corresponding to the desired difference of 5.4 months:
Z = (5.4 - 0) / 1.974 ≈ 2.734

Using a Z-table or calculator, we find the probability corresponding to Z = 2.734 is approximately 0.9932. Since we're looking for the probability that the sample mean differs from the true mean by less than 5.4 months, we need to consider both tails of the distribution (i.e., the probability of the sample mean being 5.4 months greater or 5.4 months lesser than the true mean). So, we need to calculate the probability for -2.734 as well, which is 1 - 0.9932 = 0.0068.

Finally, we'll add the probabilities for both tails to get the answer:
P(-2.734 < Z < 2.734) = 0.9932 + 0.0068 = 1.0000

to learn more about probability click here:

brainly.com/question/29221515

#SPJ11

In order for the senator to have a confidence level of 90% that the sample proportion will not deviate from the actual proportion by more than 5%, they must conduct a survey of at least 273 voters.

To estimate the proportion of United States voters who favor abolishing the electoral college with a 90% confidence level and a margin of error of 5%, we need to use the formula :

n = (z² * p * (1-p)) / E²

where n is the sample size, z is the z-score for the desired confidence level (1.645 for 90% confidence level), p is the estimated proportion (0.5 is a conservative estimate since we don't know the true proportion), and E is the margin of error in proportion (0.05).

Plugging in the values, we get n = (1.645² * 0.5 * (1-0.5)) / 0.05² = 272.25. Since we cannot have a non-integer sample size, we round up to the nearest integer, so the minimum sample size needed is 273.

Therefore, the senator needs to survey at least 273 voters to be 90% confident that the sample proportion will not differ from the true proportion by more than 5%.

To know more about confidence level, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/22851322#

#SPJ11

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Assuming that the giant sugar cube is a perfect cube, we can calculate its volume by using the formula:

Volume = edge length³

To find the edge length, we need to first calculate the amount of wood used per unit of volume, which is given by:

wood per unit volume = 213.5 m³ / 1 unit of volume

We don't know the unit of volume of the sugar cube, but we can use any consistent unit, such as meters, centimeters, or millimeters. Let's use meters for consistency with the given material amount.

Now, we can find the edge length by solving the following equation for x:

wood per unit volume = 213.5 m³ / x³

x³ = 213.5 m³ / wood per unit volume

x³ = 213.5 m³ / (213.5 m³ / 1 unit of volume)

x³ = 1 unit of volume

Therefore, the edge length of the giant sugar cube is 1 meter.

Finally, we can calculate the volume inside the giant sugar cube by using the formula:

Volume = edge length³

Volume = 1³ = 1 cubic meter

Therefore, the volume inside the giant sugar cube is 1 cubic meter.

Answer:

Jan is not correct.

Every rhombus is a parallelogram, but not every parallelogram is a rhombus.

The probability of making a Type I error is equal to 1 - 0.99 = 0.01, which is the same as the significance level.

To answer this question, we need to understand the concepts of statistical power and Type I error. Statistical power refers to the probability of correctly rejecting the null hypothesis when it is false. In other words, it is the ability of a statistical test to detect a true effect.

On the other hand, a Type I error occurs when we reject the null hypothesis even though it is true. This is also known as a false positive.

The investigator has indicated that the power of his test is 0.87 at a significance level of 1%. This means that if there is a true effect in the population, the test has an 87% chance of correctly detecting it. However, we are interested in the probability of making a Type I error, which is the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is true.

To calculate the probability of making a Type I error, we need to use the complement of the significance level, which is 1 - 0.01 = 0.99. This represents the probability of not rejecting the null hypothesis when it is true. Therefore, the probability of making a Type I error is equal to 1 - 0.99 = 0.01, which is the same as the significance level.

In this case, the investigator has used a significance level of 1%, which means that there is a 1% chance of making a Type I error. This is a relatively low probability, which indicates that the investigator is being cautious in rejecting the null hypothesis.

However, it is important to note that the probability of making a Type I error depends on the significance level, the sample size, and the effect size. Therefore, it is important to consider these factors when interpreting the results of a statistical test.

To learn more about Type I error, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/24320889#

#SPJ11

The point on the number line that is 3/5 of the distance from the point 16 to the point -4 is given as follows:

4.

The point on the number line that is 3/5 of the distance from the point 16 to the point -4 is obtained applying the proportions in the context of the problem.

The total distance between the points is given as follows:

16 - (-4) = 16 + 4 = 20.

3/5 of the distance is given as follows:

3/5 x 20 = 12.

Hence the point is given as follows:

16 - 12 = 4.

(as 16 is the initial coordinate).

More can be learned about proportions at https://brainly.com/question/24372153

#SPJ1

The solution to the differential equation with the given initial conditions is: y = 2 e^(4t) - (1/2) t e^(4t)

To solve this differential equation, we first find the characteristic equation by assuming a solution of the form y = e^(rt). Plugging this into the differential equation, we get:

r^2 e^(rt) - 8re^(rt) + 16e^(rt) = 0

Factoring out the e^(rt) term, we get:

e^(rt) (r^2 - 8r + 16) = 0

The quadratic equation r^2 - 8r + 16 = 0 has a double root of r = 4. Therefore, the general solution to the differential equation is:

y = c1 e^(4t) + c2 t e^(4t)

To solve for the constants, we use the initial conditions. First, we have y(0) = 2, which gives us:

c1 = 2

Next, we have y'(0) = 0, which gives us:

c1 (4) + c2 (0) = 0

Solving for c2, we get:

c2 = -c1/4 = -1/2

Know more about differential equation here:

https://brainly.com/question/31583235

#SPJ11

Let's call the cost of the dryer "x".

We know from the problem that the washer costs $68 less than the dryer, so the cost of the washer would be "x - 68".

The problem also tells us that the combined cost of the washer and dryer is $782. So we can set up an equation:

x + (x - 68) = 782

Simplifying this equation, we get:

2x - 68 = 782

Adding 68 to both sides, we get:

2x = 850

Dividing both sides by 2, we get:

x = 425

So the dryer costs $425.

The probability that all of the offices in the environmental club are filled by members of the debate team is approximately 0.021 or 2.1%.

To find the probability that all of the offices in the environmental club are filled by members of the debate team, we need to use the concept of combinations.

First, we need to find the total number of ways to fill all four offices from a pool of 13 candidates. This can be done using the formula for combinations:

[tex]C(13,4) = \frac{13!}{4!(13-4)!} = \frac{13\times12\times11\times10}{4\times3\times2\times1} = 715[/tex]

So there are 715 different ways to fill the four offices.

Next, we need to find a number of ways to fill all four offices with members of the debate team. There are 6 members of the debate team, so we need to choose all four of them:

[tex]C(6,4) = \frac{6!}{4!(6-4)!} = \frac{6\times5\times4\times3}{4\times3\times2\times1} = 15[/tex]

So there are 15 different ways to fill all four offices with members of the debate team.

Finally, we can find the probability by dividing the number of ways to fill all four offices with members of the debate team by the total number of ways to fill the four offices:

P(all offices filled by debate team) = 15/715 ≈ 0.021

To learn more about probability

https://brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ4

One possible dependent measure for your experiment could be the looking time of the babies towards each collection of objects. You can use a visual preference method where you present the babies with both collections of objects side-by-side and measure the amount of time they spend looking at each one.

Another possible dependent measure is habituation or dishabituation. In this method, you repeatedly present one collection of objects to the babies until they become habituated, i.e., they stop paying attention to it. Then, you introduce the other collection of objects and measure if the babies show a renewed interest, indicating that they perceive a difference between the two collections.

Other measures could include physiological measures such as heart rate or brain activity using non-invasive techniques like electroencephalography (EEG) or functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS). However, these measures may require more specialized equipment and expertise.

for such more question on word problem

https://brainly.com/question/1781657

#SPJ11

The design described is known as a quasi-experimental design.

In a true experimental design, subjects are randomly assigned to either the experimental or control group, and the experimental stimulus is administered to the experimental group while the control group does not receive the stimulus. This allows researchers to establish cause-and-effect relationships between the independent and dependent variables.

However, in a quasi-experimental design, the researcher does not randomly assign subjects to groups. Instead, the experimental stimulus is administered to the experimental group, and then the dependent variable is measured in both the experimental and control groups.

Because the groups are not randomly assigned, it is more difficult to establish cause-and-effect relationships between the independent and dependent variables.

Quasi-experimental designs are often used when random assignment is not feasible or ethical, such as in studies of naturally occurring groups or in studies where subjects have already been exposed to a stimulus.

While these designs may not provide the same level of control as true experimental designs, they can still provide valuable insights into the relationships between variables.

To know more about quasi-experimental design, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/28139463#

#SPJ11