Integral calculus is a branch of mathematics that deals with the properties and applications of integrals. It is used extensively in many fields of science, engineering, economics, and finance, and has become an essential tool for solving complex problems and making accurate predictions.
One reason why integral calculus is so prevalent in our lives is its ability to solve optimization problems. Optimization is the process of finding the best solution among a set of alternatives, and it is important in many areas of life, such as engineering, economics, and management. Integral calculus provides a powerful framework for optimizing functions, both numerically and analytically, by finding the minimum or maximum value of a function subject to certain constraints.
Another use of integral calculus is in the calculation of areas, volumes, and other physical quantities. Many real-world problems involve computing the area under a curve, the volume of a shape, or the length of a curve, and these computations can be done using integral calculus. For example, in engineering, integral calculus is used to calculate the strength of materials, the flow rate of fluids, and the heat transfer in thermal systems.
In finance, integral calculus is used to model and analyze financial markets, including stock prices, bond prices, and interest rates. The Black-Scholes formula, which is used to price options, is based on integral calculus and has become a standard tool in financial modeling.
Overall, integral calculus has numerous applications in various fields, and its importance cannot be overstated. Whether we are designing new technologies, predicting natural phenomena, or making investment decisions, integral calculus plays a crucial role in helping us understand and solve complex problems.
---
Learn more about integration:
brainly.com/question/27026907
#SPJ11
A block of mass 2.20 kg is placed against a horizontal spring of constant k=765 N/m and pushed so the spring compresses by 0.0400 m. (a) What is the elastic potential energy of the block-spring system (in J)? ] (b) If the block is now released and the surface is frictionless, calculate the block's speed (in m/s ) after leaving the spring. m/s A 42-kg pole vaulter running at 11 m/s vaults over the bar. Her speed when she is above the bar is 1.5 m/s. Neglect air resistance, as well as any energy absorbed by the pole, and determine her altitude as she crosses the bar.
(a) To calculate the elastic potential energy of the block-spring system, we can use the formula:
Elastic potential energy (PE) = (1/2) * k * x^2
where k is the spring constant and x is the displacement of the spring.
Given that the mass of the block is 2.20 kg, the spring constant is 765 N/m, and the spring compresses by 0.0400 m, we can substitute these values into the formula to find the elastic potential energy:
PE = (1/2) * 765 N/m * (0.0400 m)^2
PE = 0.4872 J
Therefore, the elastic potential energy of the block-spring system is 0.4872 J.
(b) When the block is released and the surface is frictionless, the total mechanical energy of the system is conserved. This means that the sum of the kinetic energy (KE) and the potential energy (PE) remains constant.
Since the block starts from rest when leaving the spring, its initial potential energy is equal to the final kinetic energy:
PE = KE
Using the equation for elastic potential energy:
(1/2) * k * x^2 = (1/2) * m * v^2
where m is the mass of the block and v is its speed after leaving the spring.
Substituting the known values:
(1/2) * 765 N/m * (0.0400 m)^2 = (1/2) * 2.20 kg * v^2
Simplifying the equation:
0.4872 J = 1.10 kg * v^2
v^2 = 0.4434 m^2/s^2
Taking the square root:
v ≈ 0.666 m/s
Therefore, the block's speed after leaving the spring is approximately 0.666 m/s.
Regarding the second question about the pole vaulter, more information is needed to determine her altitude as she crosses the bar.
To know more about elastic potential energy click this link -
brainly.com/question/29311518
#SPJ11
An unpolarized ray of light in air is incident on a glass block of refractive index 1.4. Using an iterative method, or otherwise, find, to within 2°, an angle of incidence for which the reflected ray is 50% polarized (that is, the total intensity is twice the
difference in intensity between the s- and p-polarized light).
Using an iterative method, an angle of incidence of approximately 56.5° will result in a reflected ray that is 50% polarized.
To find the angle of incidence for which the reflected ray is 50% polarized, we can use the Fresnel equations and apply an iterative method. The Fresnel equations describe the reflection and transmission of light at the interface between two media with different refractive indices.
Let's assume the angle of incidence is θ. The angle of reflection will also be θ for unpolarized light. We need to find the angle of incidence at which the reflected ray is 50% polarized.
The Fresnel equations for reflection coefficients (r_s and r_p) are given by:
r_s = (n1 * cos(θ) - n2 * cos(φ)) / (n1 * cos(θ) + n2 * cos(φ))
r_p = (n2 * cos(θ) - n1 * cos(φ)) / (n2 * cos(θ) + n1 * cos(φ))
where:
n1 is the refractive index of the first medium (air) = 1.00 (approximated as 1 for simplicity)n2 is the refractive index of the second medium (glass) = 1.4φ is the angle of refractionWe want the reflected ray to be 50% polarized, which means the intensity of the reflected ray should be twice the difference in intensity between s- and p-polarized light. Mathematically, we can express this as:
2 * (1 - |r_s|^2) = |r_p|^2 - |r_s|^2
Simplifying this equation, we have:
2 - 2|r_s|^2 = |r_p|^2 - |r_s|^2
|r_p|^2 = |r_s|^2 + 2
To solve this equation iteratively, we can start with an initial guess for θ and then update it until we find a solution that satisfies the equation.
Let's start the iterative process:
Choose an initial guess for θ, such as 45°.Calculate the corresponding values of r_s and r_p using the Fresnel equations.Calculate |r_s|^2 and |r_p|^2.Check if |r_p|^2 - |r_s|^2 is close to 2 within a certain tolerance (e.g., 0.01). If it is, stop and consider θ as the solution. Otherwise, proceed to the next step.Adjust θ by a small increment (e.g., 0.1°) and go back to step 2.Repeat steps 2-5 until |r_p|^2 - |r_s|^2 is close to 2 within the tolerance.By applying this iterative method, you can find an angle of incidence, accurate to within 2°, for which the reflected ray is 50% polarized.
To learn more about iterative process, Visit:
https://brainly.com/question/26995556
#SPJ11
How much heat is needed to transform 1.0 kg g of ice at -30°C to liquid water at 25 "C? Note: assume specific heat of solid ice = 2220 J/kg K; heat of fusion=333 kJ/kg; use specific heat of water = 4186 J/kg-K
To calculate the amount of heat required to transform 1.0 kg of ice at -30°C to liquid water at 25°C, the following steps are necessary: To heat the ice from -30°C to 0°C, we'll need the following:Q1 = m x Cs x ΔT where m = 1.0 kg (mass of ice)Cs = 2220 J/kg-K (specific heat of ice)ΔT = 0°C - (-30°C) = 30°CQ1 = (1.0 kg) x (2220 J/kg-K) x (30°C)Q1 = 66600 Joules of heat.
To melt the ice at 0°C to liquid water at 0°C, we'll need the following:Q2 = m x Hf where m = 1.0 kg (mass of ice) Hf = 333 kJ/kg (heat of fusion)Q2 = (1.0 kg) x (333 kJ/kg)Q2 = 333000 Joules of heat. To heat the liquid water from 0°C to 25°C, we'll need the following:Q3 = m x Cw x ΔTwhere m = 1.0 kg (mass of water) Cw = 4186 J/kg-K (specific heat of water)ΔT = 25°C - 0°C = 25°CQ3 = (1.0 kg) x (4186 J/kg-K) x (25°C)Q3 = 104650 Joules of heat. The total amount of heat required to transform 1.0 kg of ice at -30°C to liquid water at 25°C is:Q = Q1 + Q2 + Q3Q = 66600 J + 333000 J + 104650 JQ = 504650 Joules. Therefore, 504650 Joules of heat is required to transform 1.0 kg of ice at -30°C to liquid water at 25°C.
To know more about specific heat visit
https://brainly.com/question/31608647
#SPJ11
consider the following two experiments which result in the slow experiment) or fast experiment I deformation of a basketoall:
it you slowly press with your foot a basketoall to the floor
(in) you throw the basketball toward the floor as fast as you can, and the basketball deforms quickly as it hits the ground. Which deformation process is more likely to not change the entropy of the ideal gas contained by the basketball? Consider that initially the basketball, floor, and foot are all at the
same temperature.
Select one:
O a. experiment (i)
• b. experiment (i)
• c.
experiments ) and (if)
• d.
None
Both experiment (i) and experiment (ii) are likely to change the entropy of the ideal gas contained by the basketball. Option D
Entropy measurement
Both experiment (i), where the basketball is slowly pressed to the floor, and experiment (ii), where the basketball is thrown quickly towards the floor, are likely to change the entropy of the ideal gas contained by the basketball.
Entropy is related to the disorder or randomness in a system, and the deformation of the basketball in both cases leads to an increase in disorder.
Therefore, neither experiment (i) nor experiment (ii) is more likely to maintain the entropy of the ideal gas in the basketball unchanged.
More on entropy can be found here: https://brainly.com/question/20166134
#SPJ4
The idea that force causes acceleration doesn’t seem strange. This and other ideas of Newtonian mechanics are consistent with our everyday experience. Why do the ideas of relativity seem strange? 1. The effects of relativity become apparent only at very high speeds very uncommon to everyday experience. 2. Earth’s rotation doesn’t let us observe relativity that applies to systems moving in straight trajectories. 3. The principles of relativity apply outside Earth. 4. For the effects of relativity to become apparent large masses are needed.
The ideas of relativity seem strange compared to Newtonian mechanics because their effects are only apparent at very high speeds, which are uncommon in everyday experience. Earth's rotation also limits our ability to observe relativity, as it applies to systems moving in straight trajectories. Additionally, the principles of relativity extend beyond Earth and apply in various scenarios. Lastly, the effects of relativity become more pronounced with large masses. These factors contribute to the perception that the ideas of relativity are unfamiliar and counterintuitive.
The principles of relativity, as formulated by Albert Einstein, can appear strange because their effects are most noticeable at speeds that are far beyond what we encounter in our daily lives. Relativity introduces concepts like time dilation and length contraction, which become significant at velocities approaching the speed of light. These speeds are not typically encountered by humans, making the effects of relativity seem abstract and distant from our everyday experiences.
Earth's rotation further complicates our ability to observe relativity's effects. Relativity primarily applies to systems moving in straight trajectories, while Earth's rotation introduces additional complexities due to its curved path. As a result, the apparent effects of relativity are not easily observable in our day-to-day lives.
Moreover, the principles of relativity extend beyond Earth and apply in various scenarios throughout the universe. The behavior of objects, the passage of time, and the properties of light are all influenced by relativity in a wide range of cosmic settings. This universality of relativity contributes to its seemingly strange nature, as it challenges our intuitive understanding based on Earth-bound experiences.
Lastly, the effects of relativity become more pronounced with large masses. Gravitational fields, which are described by general relativity, become significant around massive objects like stars and black holes. Consequently, the predictions of relativity become more evident in these extreme environments, where the warping of spacetime and the bending of light can be observed.
In summary, the ideas of relativity appear strange compared to Newtonian mechanics due to the combination of their effects being noticeable only at high speeds, limited observations caused by Earth's rotation, the universal application of relativity, and the requirement of large masses for the effects to become apparent. These factors contribute to the perception that relativity is unfamiliar and counterintuitive in our everyday experiences.
Learn more about Relativity here:
brainly.com/question/31293268
#SPJ11
A narrow beam of light with wavelengths from 450 nm to 700 nm is incident perpendicular to one face of a prism made of crown glass, for which the index of refraction ranges from n = 1.533 to n = 1.517 for those wavelengths. The light strikes the opposite side of the prism at an angle of 37.0°. Part A What is the angular spread of the beam as it leaves the prism? Express your answer in degrees. VO ΑΣΦ Δθ = Submit Previous Answers Request Answer X Incorrect; Try Again
The angular spread of the beam as it leaves the prism is 3.28°.
Given: A narrow beam of light with wavelengths from λ1 = 450 nm to λ2 = 700 nm is incident perpendicular to one face of a prism made of crown glass, for which the index of refraction ranges from n1 = 1.533 to n2 = 1.517 for those wavelengths. The light strikes the opposite side of the prism at an angle of θ1 = 37.0°.
We have to find the angular spread of the beam as it leaves the prism. Let's call it Δθ.
Using Snell's law, we can find the angle of refraction asθ2 = sin⁻¹(n1/n2)sinθ1 = sin⁻¹(1.533/1.517)sin37.0°θ2 ≈ 37.6°The total deviation produced by the prism can be found as δ = (θ1 - θ2).δ = 37.0° - 37.6°δ ≈ -0.6°We will consider the absolute value for δ, as the angle of deviation cannot be negative.δ = 0.6°For small angles, we can consider sinθ ≈ θ in radians.
Using this approximation, the angular spread can be found asΔθ = δ (λ2 - λ1)/(n2 - n1)cos(θ1 + δ/2)Δθ = (0.6°) (700 nm - 450 nm)/(1.517 - 1.533)cos(37.0° - 0.6°/2)Δθ ≈ 3.28°Therefore, the angular spread of the beam as it leaves the prism is 3.28°.
to know more about wavelengths here:
brainly.com/question/31143857
#SPJ11
One mole of oxygen gas is at a pressure of 5.80 atm and a temperature of 27.5°C.(a) If the gas is heated at constant volume until the pressure triples, what is the final temperature?
_____ °C
(b) If the gas is heated so that both the pressure and volume are doubled, what is the final temperature?
_____ °C
(a) The final temperature, when the pressure triples at constant volume, is 110.6 °C.
(b) The final temperature, when both the pressure and volume are doubled, is 219.3 °C.
To solve both parts of the question, we can use the combined gas law, which states that the ratio of pressure to temperature remains constant when volume is constant:
P1/T1 = P2/T2
Where:
P1 and P2 are the initial and final pressures
T1 and T2 are the initial and final temperatures
Given:
P1 = 5.80 atm (initial pressure)
T1 = 27.5 °C (initial temperature)
(a) When the pressure triples (P2 = 3 * P1) at constant volume:
P2 = 3 * 5.80 atm = 17.40 atm
We can rearrange the equation to solve for T2:
T2 = T1 * (P2 / P1)
Substituting the given values, we get:
T2 = 27.5 °C * (17.40 atm / 5.80 atm) = 110.6 °C
Therefore, the final temperature when the pressure triples is 110.6 °C.
(b) When both the pressure and volume are doubled:
P2 = 2 * P1 = 2 * 5.80 atm = 11.60 atm
We can again use the rearranged equation to solve for T2:
T2 = T1 * (P2 / P1)
Substituting the given values, we get:
T2 = 27.5 °C * (11.60 atm / 5.80 atm) = 55.0 °C
Therefore, the final temperature when both the pressure and volume are doubled is 55.0 °C.
To know more about pressure visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28012687
#SPJ11
Can there be a stable and unchanging electric or magnetic field in a region of space with no charges (and thus no currents)? There could be charges or currents near the region, but not inside of it. Justify your answer using Maxwell's equations.
According to Maxwell's equations, the magnetic field lines will not exist independently of charges or currents, unlike the electric field lines. As a result, a stable and unchanging magnetic field will not be produced without a current or charge. On the other hand, an electric field can exist in a vacuum without the presence of any charges or currents. As a result, in a region of space without any charges or currents, a stable and unchanging electric field can exist.
Maxwell's equations are a set of four equations that describe the electric and magnetic fields. These equations have been shown to be valid and precise. The Gauss's law, the Gauss's law for magnetism, the Faraday's law, and the Ampere's law with Maxwell's correction are the four equations.
The Gauss's law is given by the equation below:
∇.E=ρ/ε0(1) Where, E is the electric field, ρ is the charge density and ε0 is the vacuum permittivity.
The Gauss's law for magnetism is given by the equation below:
∇.B=0(2)Where, B is the magnetic field.
The Faraday's law is given by the equation below:
∇×E=−∂B/∂t(3)Where, ∂B/∂t is the time derivative of magnetic flux density.
The Ampere's law with Maxwell's correction is given by the equation below:
∇×B=μ0(ε0∂E/∂t+J)(4)Where, μ0 is the magnetic permeability, ε0 is the vacuum permittivity, J is the current density.
In a region of space without any charges or currents, the Gauss's law (Eq. 1) states that the electric field lines will exist. So, an electric field can exist in a vacuum without the presence of any charges or currents. However, in the absence of charges or currents, the Gauss's law for magnetism (Eq. 2) states that magnetic field lines cannot exist independently. As a result, a stable and unchanging magnetic field will not be produced without a current or charge. Therefore, in a region of space without any charges or currents, a stable and unchanging electric field can exist, but a magnetic field cannot.
Learn more here: https://brainly.com/question/14411049
#SPJ11
A hypothetical atom has four distinct energy states. Assuming all transitions are possible, how many spectral lines this atom can produce ?
The hypothetical atom can produce 6 spectral lines.
The number of spectral lines an atom can produce is determined by the number of possible transitions between its energy states.
To find the number of transitions, we can use the formula for combinations:
n = (N * (N - 1)) / 2
where:
n is the number of transitions (spectral lines),
N is the number of distinct energy states.
In this case, the atom has four distinct energy states, so we can substitute N = 4 into the formula:
n = (4 * (4 - 1)) / 2
n = (4 * 3) / 2
n = 12 / 2
n = 6
Therefore, the hypothetical atom can produce 6 spectral lines.
Learn more about hypothetical atom from the given link
https://brainly.com/question/33128317
#SPJ11
Estimate the required depth (ft) of flow of water over a straight drop spillway 14 ft in length to carry a runoff of 40,000 gpm. a. 1.88 b. 1.78 c. 1.68 d. 1.58
It is given that: Length of spillway = 14 ft, Discharge through spillway = 40,000 gpm.
We need to estimate the depth of flow of water over the spillway to carry a runoff of 40,000 gpm. Let, the depth of flow of water over the spillway be 'd' ft. The discharge through spillway can be calculated as: Discharge through spillway = Length of spillway × Width of flow × Velocity of flowgpm = ft × ft/s × 448.8 (1 gpm = 448.8 ft³/s)Therefore, Width of flow × Velocity of flow = gpm/ (Length of spillway × 448.8) Width of flow × Velocity of flow = 40,000/(14 × 448.8)Width of flow × Velocity of flow = 1.615 ft²/s.
The continuity equation states that the product of the area of the cross-section of the flow and the average velocity of the flow is constant. Mathematically ,A₁V₁ = A₂V₂Here, the area of the cross-section of the flow of water over the spillway is the product of the width and depth of flow of water over the spillway . Mathematically, A = Width of flow × Depth of flow And, velocity of the flow is given as: Velocity of flow = Q/A = 40,000/(Width of flow × Depth of flow)Hence,40,000/(Width of flow × Depth of flow) = Width of flow × Velocity of flow =Width of flow × Velocity of flow × Depth of flow = 40,000, Depth of flow = 40,000/(Width of flow × Velocity of flow)Depth of flow = 40,000/(1.615 × 1)Depth of flow = 24760.86 ft³/sTo convert cubic feet per second to cubic feet per minute, we multiply it by 60.
Hence, Flow rate in cubic feet per minute = 24760.86 × 60 = 1,485,651.6 ft³/min. Flow rate in cubic feet per minute is 1,485,651.6 ft³/min. Now, Flow rate = Width of flow × Depth of flow × Velocity of flow1,485,651.6 = Width of flow × Depth of flow × 1.615Depth of flow = 1.88 ft. The required depth of flow of water over a straight drop spillway 14 ft in length to carry a runoff of 40,000 gpm is 1.88 ft. Therefore, option a) 1.88 is correct.
Let's learn more about Depth:
https://brainly.com/question/28516504
#SPJ11
Acar slows from 23.69 m/s to rest in 4.44 s. How far did it travel in this time?
A car slows from 23.69 m/s to rest in 4.44 s. It traveled a distance of 52.75 m in this time.
Displacement is the change in position of an object. It is a vector quantity, which means that it has both a magnitude and a direction. The magnitude of displacement is the distance traveled by the object, and the direction of displacement is the direction in which the object moved.
Given data
Initial velocity, u = 23.69 m/s
Final velocity, v = 0 m/s
Time, t = 4.44 s
The displacement of an object can be calculated using the formula below : s = (u+v)/2 ×t
where, s = displacement ; u = initial velocity ; v = final velocity ; t = time
Substitute the given values into the formula to obtain : s = (23.69+0)/2 ×4.44s = 52.75 m
Therefore, the car traveled a distance of 52.75 m in this time.
To learn more about displacement :
https://brainly.com/question/321442
#SPJ11
A radio signal is broadcast uniformly in all directions. The average energy density is at a distance d 0 from the transmitter. Determine the average energy density at a distance 2d 0 from the transmitter. (1/2) 2 (1/4) 4
The average energy density at a distance 2d0 from the transmitter is one-fourth of the average energy density at a distance d0 from the transmitter.
The average energy density of a radio signal is inversely proportional to the square of the distance from the transmitter. In this scenario, the average energy density at a distance 2d0 from the transmitter can be determined using the inverse square law.
According to the inverse square law, when the distance from the transmitter is doubled, the average energy density is reduced to one-fourth of its original value.
This can be explained as follows: Suppose the average energy density at a distance d0 from the transmitter is E. When we move to a distance 2d0, the area over which the signal is spread increases by a factor of [tex](2d0/d0)^{2}[/tex] = 4.
Since the total energy remains the same, the average energy density is distributed over four times the area, resulting in a reduction of the energy density to 1/4 of the original value.
Therefore, the average energy density at a distance 2d0 from the transmitter is (1/4) times the average energy density at a distance d0 from the transmitter.
To know more about radio signal, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/31376600#
#SPJ11
The velocity of a mass is increased 4 times the kinetic energy is increased a) 16 times b) 4 times c) 2 times d) 8 times e) not at all, since the mass remains the same.
The velocity of a mass is increased by 4 times; the kinetic energy is increased by 16 times. The correct option is a) 16 times.
What is kinetic energy?
Kinetic energy is the energy an object possesses when it is in motion. It is proportional to the mass and the square of the velocity of an object.
Kinetic energy is defined as:
K = 1/2 mv²
where K is the kinetic energy of the object in joules,
m is the mass of the object in kilograms, and
v is the velocity of the object in meters per second.
Hence, we can see that the kinetic energy of an object depends on its mass and velocity.
The question states that the velocity of a mass is increased 4 times.
Therefore, if the initial velocity was v,
the final velocity is 4v.
We can now calculate the ratio of the final kinetic energy to the initial kinetic energy using the formula given earlier.
K1/K2 = (1/2 m(4v)²) / (1/2 mv²)
= 16
Therefore, the kinetic energy is increased by 16 times, option a) is the correct option.
Learn more about kinetic energy, here
https://brainly.com/question/30337295
#SPJ11
Find an expression for the velocity of the particle as a function of time ( ) (a) = (t + 100 m/s (b) 7 = (2ti + 107 m/s (c) v = (2+ i + 10tj) m/s (d) v = (2ti + 101 m/s
The velocity of the particle as a function of time is v = (2ti + 101) m/s (option d) .
Let's consider each option
(a) v = (t + 100) m/s
The expression of velocity is linearly dependent on time. Therefore, the particle moves with constant acceleration. Thus, incorrect.
(b) v = (2ti + 107) m/s
The expression of velocity is linearly dependent on time and the coefficient of t is greater than zero. Therefore, the particle moves with constant acceleration. Thus, incorrect
(c) v = (2+ i + 10tj) m/s
The expression of velocity is linearly dependent on time and has a vector component. Therefore, the particle moves in 3D space. Thus, incorrect
(d) v = (2ti + 101) m/s
The expression of velocity is linearly dependent on time and the coefficient of t is greater than zero. Therefore, the particle moves with constant acceleration.
Thus, the correct answer is (d) v = (2ti + 101) m/s.
To learn more about velocity :
https://brainly.com/question/80295
#SPJ11
A rocket cruises past a laboratory at 1.10 x 10% m/s in the positive -direction just as
a proton is launched with velocity (in the laboratory
framel
u = (1.90 × 10°2 + 1.90 × 10%) m/s.
What is the proton's speed in the laboratory frame?
The proton's speed in the laboratory frame is 0.0002 m/s.
Given data :A rocket cruises past a laboratory at 1.10 x 10% m/s in the positive direction just as a proton is launched with velocity (in the laboratory frame) u = (1.90 × 10² + 1.90 × 10%) m/s. Find: We are to find the proton's speed in the laboratory frame .Solution: Speed of the rocket (S₁) = 1.10 x 10^8 m/ velocity of the proton (u) = 1.90 × 10² m/s + 1.90 × 10^-2 m/s= 1.90 × 10² m/s + 0.0019 m/s Let's calculate the speed of the proton :Since the rocket is moving in the positive x-direction, the velocity of the rocket in the laboratory frame can be written as V₁ = 1.10 × 10^8 m/s in the positive x-direction .Velocity of the proton in the rocket frame will be:
u' = u - V₁u'
= 1.90 × 10² m/s + 0.0019 m/s - 1.10 × 10^8 m/su'
= -1.10 × 10^8 m/s + 1.90 × 10² m/s + 0.0019 m/su'
= -1.10 × 10^8 m/s + 1.9019 × 10² m/su'
= -1.10 × 10^8 m/s + 190.19 m/su'
= -1.09980981 × 10^8 m/su'
= -1.0998 × 10^8 m/s
The proton's speed in the laboratory frame will be:v = u' + V₁v = -1.0998 × 10^8 m/s + 1.10 × 10^8 m/sv = 0.0002 m/s Therefore, the proton's speed in the laboratory frame is 0.0002 m/s.
To learn more about proton's speed visit below link
https://brainly.com/question/28523021
#SPJ11
A tennis ball on Mars, where the acceleration due to gravity is 0.379 of a g and air resistance is negligible, is hit directly upward and returns to the same level 9.50 s later.
How high above its original point did the ball go?
The maximum height reached by the tennis ball above its original point is 168.8605 meters.
Here, we are going to find out how high a tennis ball would go above its original point if it's hit directly upward and returns to the same level 9.50 seconds later. The acceleration due to gravity on Mars is 0.379 of a g. To solve this problem, we need to use the kinematic equations of motion and the equation to calculate the maximum height reached by an object that is launched vertically upwards using the acceleration due to gravity.
Using kinematic equation, we have:
s = ut + (1/2)at²
Where:
s = height or displacement
u = initial velocity = 0 (the ball was hit directly upward)
a = acceleration due to gravity on Mars = 0.379 x 9.81 m/s² = 3.73259 m/s²t = time taken by the ball to reach the maximum height or displacement = 9.50 s
Substituting the given values, we have:s = (0 × 9.50) + (1/2) (3.73259) (9.50)²s = 168.8605 m
To know more about original point:
https://brainly.com/question/11524720
#SPJ11
Question 32 of 37 > a Consider the inelastic collision. Two lumps of matter are moving directly toward each other. Each lump has a mass of 1.500 kg and is moving at a speed of 0.930c. The two lumps collide and stick together. Answer the questions, keeping in mind that relativistic effects cannot be neglected in this case. What is the final speed up of the combined lump, expressed as a fraction of c? UL What is the final mass me of the combined lump immediately after the collision, assuming that there has not yet been significant energy loss due to radiation or fragmentation? ks mi stion 31 of 375 As you take your leisurely tour through the solar system, you come across a 1.47 kg rock that was ejected from a collision of asteroids. Your spacecraft's momentum detector shows a value of 1.75 X 10% kg•m/s for this rock. What is the rock's speed? m/s rock's speed:
For the first part of the question, it is given that two lumps of matter are moving directly towards each other with a velocity of 0.930c each. Here, c is the speed of light. The final velocity of the combined lumps is to be found. The lumps collide and stick together, which is known as an inelastic collision.
Question 32 of 37 >a) Consider the inelastic collision. Two lumps of matter are moving directly toward each other. Each lump has a mass of 1.500 kg and is moving at a speed of 0.930c. The two lumps collide and stick together. Answer the questions, keeping in mind that relativistic effects cannot be neglected in this case.
What is the final speed up of the combined lump, expressed as a fraction of c?
UL What is the final mass me of the combined lump immediately after the collision, assuming that there has not yet been significant energy loss due to radiation or fragmentation?
ksmi stion 31 of 375As you take your leisurely tour through the solar system, you come across a 1.47 kg rock that was ejected from a collision of asteroids. Your spacecraft's momentum detector shows a value of 1.75 X 10% kg•m/s for this rock. What is the rock's speed? m/s rock's speed:
Answer: The equation for the speed of a moving body is given by mass times velocity. The mass of the rock is 1.47 kg. The momentum detector registers a momentum of 1.75 × 10^3 kg•m/s. We can use the formula for momentum to calculate the velocity of the rock; Momentum is equal to mass times velocity, which is written as p = mv. Rearranging the equation gives the velocity of the object; v = p/m.
Substituting p = 1.75 × 10^3 kg • m/s and m = 1.47 kg into the equation gives; v = (1.75 × 10^3 kg•m/s) / (1.47 kg)v = 1189.12 m/s
rock's speed = 1189.12 m/s
For the first part of the question, it is given that two lumps of matter are moving directly towards each other with a velocity of 0.930c each. Here, c is the speed of light. The final velocity of the combined lumps is to be found. The lumps collide and stick together, which is known as an inelastic collision. This means that both the lumps move together after the collision. The total mass of the combined lumps is 3 kg, i.e., 1.5 kg + 1.5 kg. Using the equation, we can find the final velocity of the combined lump; v = [(m_1*v_1) + (m_2*v_2)] / (m_1 + m_2)
Where, m1 = m2 = 1.5 kg and v1 = v2 = 0.93c = 0.93 × 3 × 10^8 m/s = 2.79 × 10^8 m/s. Substituting these values into the equation gives; v = [(1.5 kg × 0.93 × 3 × 10^8 m/s) + (1.5 kg × 0.93 × 3 × 10^8 m/s)] / (1.5 kg + 1.5 kg)
v = (2.09 × 10^8 m/s) / 3 kg
v = 0.697 × 10^8 m/s
v = 0.697c
Therefore, the final velocity of the combined lump is 0.697c.
To know more about speed of light visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29216893
#SPJ11
You have a 150-Ω resistor and a 0.440-H inductor. Suppose you take the resistor and inductor and make a series circuit with a voltage source that has a voltage amplitude of 35.0 V and an angular frequency of 210 rad/s.
What is the impedance of the circuit? (Z = …Ω)
What is the current amplitude? (I = …A)
What is the voltage amplitude across the resistor? (V(R) = ...V)
What is the voltage amplitudes across the inductor? (V(L) = ...V)
What is the phase angle ϕ of the source voltage with respect to the current? (ϕ = … degrees)
Does the source voltage lag or lead the current?
Construct the phasor diagram. Draw the force vectors with their tails at the dot. The orientation of your vectors will be graded.
1) The impedance is 176 ohm
2) Current amplitude is 0.199 A
3) Voltage across resistor is 29.9 V
4) Voltage across inductor 18.4 V
5) The phase angle is 32 degrees
What is the impedance?We have that;
XL = ωL
XL = 0.440 * 210
= 92.4 ohms
Then;
Z =√R^2 + XL^2
Z = √[tex](150)^2 + (92.4)^2[/tex]
Z = 176 ohm
The current amplitude = V/Z
= 35 V/176 ohm
= 0.199 A
Resistor voltage = 0.199 A * 150 ohms
= 29.9 V
Inductor voltage = 0.199 A * 92.4 ohms
= 18.4 V
Phase angle =Tan-1 (XL/XR)
= Tan-1( 18.4/29.9)
= 32 degrees
Learn more about impedance:https://brainly.com/question/30475674
#SPJ4
standing wave on a 2-m stretched string is described by: y(x,t) = 0.1 sin(3rıx) cos(50nt), where x and y are in meters and t is in seconds. Determine the shortest distance between a node and an antinode
Standing wave on a 2-m stretched string is described by: y(x,t) = 0.1 sin(3rıx) cos(50nt), where x and y are in meters and t is in seconds.The shortest distance between a node and an antinode is approximately 16.67 cm.
To determine the shortest distance between a node and an antinode in the given standing wave, we need to analyze the properties of nodes and antinodes.
In a standing wave on a string, nodes are points where the displacement is always zero, while antinodes are points where the displacement reaches its maximum value.
The equation for the given standing wave is y(x, t) = 0.1 sin(3πx) cos(50πt).
To find the distance between a node and an antinode, we can consider the wave pattern along the string.
The general equation for a standing wave on a string is y(x, t) = A sin(kx) cos(ωt), where A is the amplitude, k is the wave number, x is the position along the string, and ω is the angular frequency.
Comparing this with the given equation, we can see that the wave number (k) is 3π and the angular frequency (ω) is 50π
In a standing wave, the distance between a node and an adjacent antinode is equal to λ/4, where λ is the wavelength of the wave.
The wavelength (λ) can be calculated using the formula λ = 2π/k.
Substituting the given value of k = 3π, we can find λ:
λ = 2π/(3π) = 2/3 meters.
Therefore, the shortest distance between a node and an antinode is equal to λ/4:
λ/4 = (2/3) / 4 = 2/12 = 1/6 meters.
To convert this into centimeters, we multiply by 100:
(1/6) ×100 = 100/6 cm ≈ 16.67 cm.
Therefore, the shortest distance between a node and an antinode is approximately 16.67 cm.
To learn more about antinode visit: https://brainly.com/question/11735759
#SPJ11
Suppose that not all but only 50% of the neutrons were consumed in Big Bang Nucleosynthesis. What would the H:He mass ratio be?
The H:He mass ratio if only 50% of neutrons were used in Big Bang Nucleosynthesis will be 3:1.
Let us see how this conclusion was reached.
Big Bang Nucleosynthesis is a cosmological event in which the nuclei of helium, lithium, and deuterium were formed within a few seconds of the Big Bang. This event happened between 10 seconds and 20 minutes after the Big Bang and produced the elements that make up the universe. It is important to note that in this process, only some of the neutrons present were used. This is because most of the neutrons decayed into protons. This means that only about one neutron out of every seven was available to make heavier nuclei.
Suppose 7 neutrons were present during Big Bang Nucleosynthesis, and only 50% of them were used. Therefore, only 3.5 neutrons would have been used in the process. If we rounded that to 3 neutrons, the remaining neutrons would have decayed to form protons. This means that 6 protons and 3 neutrons would have combined to form helium-3 (2 protons and 1 neutron) and helium-4 (2 protons and 2 neutrons).
The H:He mass ratio would be calculated as follows:
For H, we have 2 protons, which is equivalent to a mass number of 2.
For He, we have 2 protons and 2 neutrons, which is equivalent to a mass number of 4.
Therefore, the H:He mass ratio is: 2:4, which is equivalent to 1:2, which can be further simplified to 3:1. Hence, the H:He mass ratio if only 50% of neutrons were used in Big Bang Nucleosynthesis would be 3:1.
Learn more about "Mass Ratio in Big Bang Nucleosynthesis" refer to the link : https://brainly.com/question/13517558
#SPJ11
If a sprinter runs a 200 m in 21.34 s, what is their average
velocity in m/s?
The average velocity of a sprinter who runs 200 m in 21.34 s is 9.37 m/s.
Here's how we can calculate it:
We know that average velocity is equal to displacement divided by time. In this case, the displacement is 200 m (since that's how far the sprinter ran) and the time is 21.34 s.
Therefore, we can write the formula as:
v = d/t
where:
v = average velocity
d = displacement
t = time
Now, we can substitute the values:
v = 200 m / 21.34 sv = 9.37 m/s
So the average velocity of the sprinter is 9.37 m/s.
Learn more about average velocity from the given link
https://brainly.com/question/24824545
#SPJ11
Give an example of a moving frame of reference and draw the moving coordinates.
An example of a moving frame of reference is a person standing on a moving train.
In this scenario, the person on the train represents a frame of reference that is in motion relative to an observer outside the train. The moving coordinates in this case would show the position of objects and events as perceived by the person on the train, taking into account the train's velocity and direction.
Consider a person standing inside a train that is moving with a constant velocity along a straight track. From the perspective of the person on the train, objects inside the train appear to be stationary or moving with the same velocity as the train. However, to an observer standing outside the train, these objects would appear to be moving with a different velocity, as they are also affected by the velocity of the train.
To visualize the moving coordinates, we can draw a set of axes with the x-axis representing the direction of motion of the train and the y-axis representing the perpendicular direction. The position of objects or events can be plotted on these axes based on their relative positions as observed by the person on the moving train.
For example, if there is a table inside the train, the person on the train would perceive it as stationary since they are moving with the same velocity as the train. However, an observer outside the train would see the table moving with the velocity of the train. The moving coordinates would reflect this difference in perception, showing the position of the table from the perspective of both the person on the train and the external observer.
Learn more about frame of reference here:
brainly.com/question/12222532
#SPJ11
A 17 kg curling stone traveling at 12.5 m/s [E] collides with another stone of the same mass. The collision is a glancing one. If the second stone is now traveling at 1.5 m/s [E25°N], calculate the velocity of the first stone after collision. 13 m/s [E6.8°S] 26 m/s [E18°N] 7.0 m/s [E1.4°N] 11 m/s [E3.3°S]
To solve this problem, we can analyze the conservation of momentum and the conservation of kinetic energy during the collision.
Let's break down the initial and final velocities of the stones into their x and y components for easier calculations. For the initial velocity of the first stone, we have:
Initial velocity of stone 1: v1 = 12.5 m/s [E]
Initial velocity of stone 2: v2 = 0 m/s [E]
The final velocity of the second stone is given as:
Final velocity of stone 2: vf2 = 1.5 m/s [E25°N]
To find the final velocity of the first stone (vf1), we need to calculate its x and y components separately. Let's assume the final velocity of the first stone has components vx1 and vy1.
Using the conservation of momentum, we know that the total momentum before the collision is equal to the total momentum after the collision. Since the masses of the stones are the same, we can write the equation:
(m1 * v1) + (m2 * v2) = (m1 * vx1) + (m2 * vf2)
Substituting the known values, we have:
(17 kg * 12.5 m/s) + (17 kg * 0 m/s) = (17 kg * vx1) + (17 kg * 1.5 m/s)
Simplifying the equation:
212.5 kg·m/s = 17 kg * vx1 + 25.5 kg·m/s
212.5 kg·m/s - 25.5 kg·m/s = 17 kg * vx1
187 kg·m/s = 17 kg * vx1
Dividing both sides by 17 kg:
vx1 = 11 m/s [E]
Now, we can use the conservation of kinetic energy to find the y-component of the final velocity of the first stone. Since the collision is glancing, the kinetic energy in the y-direction is conserved. We have:
(1/2) * m1 * v1^2 = (1/2) * m1 * vy1^2
Substituting the values:
(1/2) * 17 kg * (12.5 m/s)^2 = (1/2) * 17 kg * vy1^2
156.25 J = 8.5 kg * vy1^2
Dividing both sides by 8.5 kg:
vy1^2 = 18.3824
Taking the square root:
vy1 ≈ 4.286 m/s
Now we have the x and y components of the final velocity of the first stone. We can calculate the magnitude and direction using trigonometry:
Magnitude of vf1 = sqrt(vx1^2 + vy1^2) ≈ sqrt((11 m/s)^2 + (4.286 m/s)^2) ≈ 11.952 m/s
Direction of vf1 = atan(vy1 / vx1) ≈ atan(4.286 m/s / 11 m/s) ≈ atan(0.3896) ≈ 21.8°
The final velocity of the first stone after the collision is approximately 11.952 m/s [E21.8°N].
Among the given options, the closest value is 11 m/s [E3.3°S].
Learn more about momentum here
brainly.com/question/24030570
#SPJ11
A rod of negligible resistance is sliding along a pair of long tracks--also of negligible resistance. The tracks are connected on one end by a wire of resistance R, the rod is sliding away from this end at constant speed, and there is a uniform magnetic field which points in a direction perpendicular to the plane containing the rod and the tracks. Initially, the area bounded by the rod, the tracks, and the end is A1, but after some time the area is A2 = 3A1. At this initial time, the induced emf was 3.0 V. What will it be at the latter time, when the total enclosed area has tripled?
The induced emf will be 9.0 V when the total enclosed area has tripled.
According to Faraday's law of electromagnetic induction, the induced emf (ε) in a circuit is proportional to the rate of change of magnetic flux through the circuit. The magnetic flux (Φ) is given by the product of the magnetic field (B) and the area (A) enclosed by the circuit.
In this scenario, the initially induced emf (ε1) is 3.0 V, and the initial area (A1) is known. When the total enclosed area becomes A2 = 3A1, it means the area has tripled. Since the speed of the rod is constant, the rate of change of area is also constant.
Therefore, the ratio of the final area (A2) to the initial area (A1) is equal to the ratio of the final induced emf (ε2) to the initial induced emf (ε1).
Mathematically, we can express this relationship as:
A2/A1 = ε2/ε1
Substituting the known values, A2 = 3A1 and ε1 = 3.0 V, we can solve for ε2:
3A1/A1 = ε2/3.0 V
3 = ε2/3.0 V
Cross-multiplying, we find:
ε2 = 9.0 V
Hence, the induced emf will be 9.0 V when the total enclosed area has tripled.
To learn more about magnetic flux
Click here brainly.com/question/1596988
#SPJ11
"A boy throws a stone vertically upward. It takes 5 seconds for
the stone to reach the maximum height. What is the maximum
height?
The maximum height is 122.5 meters when a stone is thrown vertically upward.
Time is taken to reach the maximum height = 5 seconds
Acceleration due to gravity= -9.8 m/ second squared
After reaching the max height, its final velocity is zero. It is written as:
v = u + a*t
Assuming the final velocity is Zero.
0 = u + a*t
u = -a*t
u = -([tex]-9.8 m/s^2[/tex]) * 5 seconds
u = 49 m/s
The displacement formula is used to calculate the maximum height:
s = ut + (1/2)*[tex]at^2[/tex]
s = 49 m/s * 5 seconds + [tex](1/2)(-9.8 m/s^2)*(5 seconds)^2[/tex]
s = 245 m - 122.5 m
s = 122.5 m
Therefore, we can conclude that the maximum height is 122.5 meters.
To learn more about the maximum height
https://brainly.com/question/29116483
#SPJ4
A particle is incident upon a square barrier of height \( U \) and width \( L \) and has \( E=U \). What is the probability of transmission? You must show all work.
The probability of transmission is zero.
Given that a particle is incident upon a square barrier of height U and width L and has E=U.
We need to find the probability of transmission.
Let us assume that the energy of the incident particle is E.
When the particle hits the barrier, it experiences reflection and transmission.
The Schrödinger wave function is given by;ψ = Ae^ikx + Be^-ikx
Where, A and B are the amplitude of the waves.
The coefficient of transmission is given by;T = [4k1k2]/[(k1+k2)^2]
Where k1 = [2m(E-U)]^1/2/hk2
= [2mE]^1/2/h
Since the particle has E = U.
Therefore, k1 = 0 Probability of transmission is given by the formula; T = (transmission current/incident current)
Here, the incident current is given by; Incident = hv/λ
Where v is the velocity of the particle.
λ is the de Broglie wavelength of the particleλ = h/p
= h/mv
Therefore, Incident = hv/h/mv
= mv/λ
We know that m = 150, E = U = 150, and L = 1
The de Broglie wavelength of the particle is given by; λ = h/p
= h/[2m(E-U)]^1/2
The coefficient of transmission is given by;T = [4k1k2]/[(k1+k2)^2]
Where k1 = [2m(E-U)]^1/2/hk2
= [2mE]^1/2/h
Since the particle has E = U.
Therefore, k1 = 0k2
= [2mE]^1/2/h
= [2 × 150 × 1.6 × 10^-19]^1/2 /h
= 1.667 × 10^10 m^-1
Now, the coefficient of transmission,T = [4k1k2]/[(k1+k2)^2]
= [4 × 0 × 1.667 × 10^10]/[(0+1.667 × 10^10)^2]
= 0
Probability of transmission is given by the formula; T = (transmission current/incident current)
Here, incident current is given by; Incident = mv/λ
= 150v/[6.626 × 10^-34 / (2 × 150 × 1.6 × 10^-19)]
Iincident = 3.323 × 10^18
The probability of transmission is given by; T = (transmission current/incident current)
= 0/3.323 × 10^18
= 0
Hence, the probability of transmission is zero.
Learn more about transmission from the given link;
https://brainly.in/question/54329779
#SPJ11
An object is located 3cm in front of a concave mirror whose
radius of curvature is 12cm. Find (a) the focal length of the
mirror and (b) position of the image. Describe the image.
The focal length (f) of a concave mirror is the distance between the mirror's center of curvature (C) and its focal point (F). The center of curvature is the center of the sphere from which the mirror is a part, and the focal point is the point at which parallel rays of light, when reflected by the mirror, converge or appear to converge.
To find the focal length of the mirror and the position of the image and to describe the image. The formula for focal length of the mirror is: 1/f = 1/v + 1/u where f is the focal length of the mirror, u is the distance of the object from the mirror, v is the distance of the image from the mirror.
(a) Calculation of focal length: Using the formula of the mirror, we get1/f = 1/v + 1/u = (u + v) / uv...[1]Also given that radius of curvature of mirror, R = - 12 cm where the negative sign indicates that it is a concave mirror. Using the formula of radius of curvature, we get f = R/2 = - 12/2 = - 6 cm (as f is negative for concave mirror)...[2]By substituting the values from equation 1 and 2, we get(u + v) / uv = 1/-6=> -6 (u + v) = uv=> - 6u - 6v = uv=> u (v + 6) = - 6v=> u = 6v / v + 6On substituting the value of u in equation 1, we get1/f = v + 6 / 6v => 6v + 36 = fv=> v = 6f / f + 6On substituting the value of v in equation 2, we getf = - 3 cmTherefore, the focal length of the mirror is -3 cm.
(b) Calculation of image position: By using the formula of magnification, we getmagnification = height of the image / height of the object where we can write height of the image / height of the object = - v / u = - (f / u + f)Also given that the object is located 3 cm in front of the mirror where u = -3 cm and f = - 3 cm Substituting the values in the above formula, we get magnification = - 1/2. It means the size of the image is half of the object. Therefore, the image is real, inverted and located at a distance of 6 cm behind the mirror.
For similar problems on ray optics visit:
https://brainly.com/question/13088184
#SPJ11
A girl is wearing a cowgirl boot to a square dance. Estimate the pressure exerted on the dance floor by each heal
if the pointed heel has an area = 0.23 cm°2 and the cowgirl has a mass of 58.2-kg.
The pressure exerted on the dance floor by each heel of the cowgirl's boot is approximately 25,224 Pascal (Pa).
To estimate the pressure exerted on the dance floor by each heel, we can use the formula:
Pressure = Force / Area
We are given:
Area = 0.23 cm² (converted to square meters, 1 cm² = 0.0001 m²),
Mass = 58.2 kg (mass of the cowgirl).
We need to calculate the force exerted by the cowgirl's heel. The force can be determined using Newton's second law:
Force = mass * acceleration
Since the cowgirl is standing still on the dance floor, the acceleration is zero, and therefore the net force acting on her is zero. However, to calculate the pressure exerted on the dance floor, we need to consider the normal force exerted by the cowgirl on the floor.
The normal force is equal in magnitude and opposite in direction to the force exerted by the cowgirl's heel on the floor. Therefore, we can use the weight of the cowgirl as the force exerted by each heel.
Weight = mass * gravitational acceleration
Gravitational acceleration is approximately 9.8 m/s².
Weight = 58.2 kg * 9.8 m/s²
Now we can calculate the pressure:
Pressure = Force / Area
= Weight / Area
Substituting the values:
Pressure = (58.2 kg * 9.8 m/s²) / 0.23 cm²
First, let's convert the area to square meters:
Area = 0.23 cm² * 0.0001 m²/cm²
Pressure = (58.2 kg * 9.8 m/s²) / (0.23 cm² * 0.0001 m²/cm²)
Calculating:
Pressure ≈ 25,224 Pa
Therefore, the pressure exerted on the dance floor by each heel of the cowgirl's boot is approximately 25,224 Pascal (Pa).
Learn more about Newton's second law
https://brainly.com/question/15280051
#SPJ11
A baq of suqar weighs 2 lbon Earth. What would it weigh in newtons on the Moon, where the free-fall acceleration is one-sixth that on Earth?
The bag of sugar would weigh approximately 1.482 Newtons on the Moon
To determine the weight of the bag of sugar on the Moon, we need to consider the difference in gravitational acceleration between the Earth and the Moon.
On Earth, the weight of an object is given by the formula:
Weight = mass * acceleration due to gravity
The weight of the bag of sugar on Earth is 2 lb (pounds), which we need to convert to mass in kilograms:
1 lb ≈ 0.4536 kg
So, the mass of the bag of sugar is approximately:
2 lb * 0.4536 kg/lb ≈ 0.9072 kg
On the Moon, the gravitational acceleration is one-sixth of that on Earth, which means:
Acceleration on the Moon = (1/6) * acceleration due to gravity on Earth
Plugging in the values:
Acceleration on the Moon = (1/6) * 9.81 m/s² ≈ 1.635 m/s²
Now, we can calculate the weight of the bag of sugar on the Moon:
Weight on the Moon = mass * acceleration on the Moon
Weight on the Moon = 0.9072 kg * 1.635 m/s²
Weight on the Moon ≈ 1.482 N
Therefore, The bag of sugar would weigh approximately 1.482 Newtons on the Moon.
Learn more about Newtons here:
https://brainly.in/question/5611862
#SPJ11
Calculate (17.29 m + 2.3927 m) * 4.6 m to the correct number of significant figures
The correct answer for significant figures is e. 90.53 m².
To calculate the product of (17.29 m + 2.3927 m) and 4.6 m, we first perform the addition:
17.29 m + 2.3927 m = 19.6827 m
Now we multiply the result by 4.6 m:
19.6827 m × 4.6 m = 90.47122 m²
To determine the correct number of significant figures, we look at the original values. Both 17.29 m and 2.3927 m have four significant figures. The multiplication rule for significant figures states that the result should have the same number of significant figures as the least precise value involved.
In this case, 4.6 m has two significant figures, so the result should be rounded to two significant figures.
Rounding the result into two significant figures, we have:
90.47122 m² ≈ 90.47 m²
Therefore, the correct answer is e. 90.53 m²
The complete question should be:
Calculate (17.29 m + 2.3927 m) × 4.6 m to the correct number of significant figures.
a. 91 m²
b. 90.5 m²
c. 90.528 m²
d. 9 × 10¹ m²
e. 90.53 m²
To learn more about multiplication rule, Visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30340527
#SPJ11
