12. The war in the South was largely fought
A. by mercenaries on both sides.
B. between Patriot and Loyalist militias.
C. over control of major seaports.
D. Over control of the tobacco industry.
The war in the South was largely fought between Patriot and Loyalist militias.
Why did the South start the war?The United States of America and the Confederate States of America, a group of eleven southern states that seceded from the Union in 1860 and 1861, engaged in combat during the American Civil War. The long-standing dispute about the legitimacy of slavery was the main cause of the conflict's inception.
South Carolina's towns, cities, and villages were completely destroyed after the battle. The bonds and money of the Confederacy also lost all value. The South experienced an economic downturn with widening disparities between the North and South as a result of the bankruptcy of all of its banks.
Geographical benefits also applied to the North. It had more farmland than the South did to feed the army. The majority of the iron, coal, copper, and gold in the nation were found on its soil. The North had control over the oceans, and its 21,000 miles of railroad track made it possible to move troops and supplies wherever they were required.
To learn more about war visit:
https://brainly.com/question/3445478
#SPJ13
help please
An amendment is a written or verbal change to the Constitution. true or false
30 points
and brainleast
What do both Clovis and Charlemagne have in common?
They both resisted Christianity replacing their traditional religious beliefs.
They both united territories that divided quickly after their death.
They both won major victories over Muslim armies.
They were both Germanic leaders who conquered parts of the Roman Empire.
Answer:Clovis and Charlemagne were both King of Franks who used christianity as a way to superior their kingdoms. Both men fulfilled their idea of using Christianity.
Next, find out who represents you in the US House of Representatives, the US Senate, or your state congressional body. If you don’t already know who represents you, use this find your representative tool to identify the various people who represent you. In the space below, note which representative you have chosen and why.
The politicians who represent me in Congress are Patrick Joseph Toomey Jr. and Frederick B. Keller because they represent the state of Pennsylvania where I live and because they are from the Republican Party.
Who is Patrick Joseph Toomey Jr?Patrick Joseph Toomey Jr. (1961) American Republican politician who has held the position of United States Senator for the state of Pennsylvania since 2011 and had previously held this position. His main actions in the Senate have been opposition to former President Donald Trump and his fight to reduce public spending.
Who is Frederick Keller?Frederick B. Keller (1965) is an American Republican politician who represents the state of Pennsylvania in the House of Representatives. His most outstanding actions in this position have been focused on the education and labor committee.
Learn more about United States Senate in: https://brainly.com/question/891584
#SPJ1
Which River Valley Civilization was the most isolated?
Answer:
its china
Explanation:
I took the test
What is the difference between
a nation's output and its
income?
This relationship is expressed in the countrywide income identity, the place the quantity received as country wide earnings is identical to the amount spent as country wide expenditure, which is additionally same to what is produced as countrywide output.
Throughout macroeconomics the terms income, output and expenditure are interchangeable.
What is the distinction between output approach and earnings technique of measuring country wide income?The output method is extensively used in underdeveloped countries for calculating country wide income. The income technique is used in developed countries like USA and UK for estimating country wide profits.
Learn more about national income here:
https://brainly.com/question/24215193#SPJ13Who handled finances and approved laws
A. Plebians
B. Patricians
The party that handled finances and approved laws among the option is the B. Patricians.
Who were the Patricians?The word “patrician” can be described as the term that is been used i making reference to father, it can be considered as the party which is the family that help in making provision to the empire's political as well as the religious, and military leadership.
It should be noted that this patricians were the ones that usually responsible for the making of the laws as well; as having the ownership of the land and in most cases they are been seen as the ones that are chosen to be the generals over the army.
In conclusion they are usually the wealthy family that belongs to the upper class of the society which are responsible for the controlling of the other class because they try to make the law that quide the other people of the society.
Therefore, option B is correct.
Read more about laws at:
https://brainly.com/question/820417
#SPJ1
Using your notes from the video and the reading, create an argument on what YOU think started the French and Indian War. Be sure to use CER (Claim, Evidence, Reasoning) method when creating your answer. Your answer should have 2 piece of evidence and reasoning;
BoldItalicUnderline HELP ASAP
The required details about French and Indian War is mentioned in below paragraph.
Great Britain won significant territory in North America as a result of the struggle, but disagreements over how to apply frontier policies and pay for the war's costs ultimately stoked colonial insurrection and sparked the American Revolution.
How justified was the French and Indian War?
Result for an image Make a case on what YOU believe caused the French and Indian War using the text and the video notes that you have taken. Make careful to construct your response using the CER (Claim, Evidence, Reasoning) technique.
Because of the war debt, which led to Parliament's initial imposition of taxes on the colonies, the French and Indian War was crucial to the American Revolution. Additionally, the French and Indian War made Britain weaker, which strengthened the colonists' efforts.
To learn about French and Indian War visit here.
https://brainly.com/question/913617
#SPJ9
What was the main goal of european nations forming alliances in the late 19th and early 20th centuries?.
Answer:
Explanation:
Why did European nations form alliances in the late 19th and early 20th centuries?
Nations wished to protect their borders and solidify their power. They formed alliances to help secure themselves against attack and protect their own interests
What was the absolute location of the mouth of the Huang River when it was located on the Old Course south of Shandong?
Answer: 38d. N / 118d. 20' E ; 132 km (SSE) from Tianjin across 'Po Hai'.
Explanation:
The __________________ required cuba amend its constitution to grant the u. S. Certain rights and powers as well as give the u. S. Control over a naval base at guantanamo bay.
Answer:the Platt amendment
Explanation:
(B) Explain how the facts in Shaw v. Reno (1993) led to a different
holding than in League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry
(2006).
Shaw v. Reno was a case involving an unconstitutionally drawn district that disenfranchised minority voters, particularly Black voters, in contrast to League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry.
Elucidate the differences between the decisions made in Shaw v. Reno and League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry regarding District 23 and the "I- 85" district.In Shaw v. Reno, I-85, the courts determined that states must consider race when drawing district borders, but they must be careful to avoid partisanship and the denigration of the minority voice. This makes the result in the two cases different. But in American Citizens v. Perry, it was decided that partisanship in redistricting, sometimes known as gerrymandering, is entirely legitimate and that all of 2003 redistricting was permitted. Even though partisan gerrymandering was permitted in American Citizens v. Perry, which overturned the Shaw v. Reno ruling in favor of minorities, much of the power was returned to the states.
What are the facts in Shaw v. Reno (1993) that led to a different holding than in League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry (2006)?Shaw v. Reno was a case involving an unconstitutionally drawn district that disenfranchised minority votes, particularly Black voters. This makes it different from League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry. A disagreement over legislative districts also arose in League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry, but this time it involved Republicans as the Defendants and Plaintiffs. While the districts described in League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry were not ruled unlawful, the district in dispute in Shaw v. Reno was. Another distinction is that, in League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry, the claim was that the Voting Rights Act had been broken, as opposed to Shaw v. Reno, where the claim was that the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment had been infringed.The decision in League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry regarding District 23 was different from the decision in Shaw v. Reno on I-85 since it did not find the latter to be unlawful due to its disparate impact on Black voters. The Supreme Court also held in League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry that district maps might be changed at any moment as long as they were changed every ten years. Although Latino voters in District 23 became a minority of eligible voters, it was nonetheless deemed constitutional.Because the Supreme Court is meant to be free from political pressures, the Supreme Court was concerned about entering the "political thicket" in regards to the separation of powers. As a result, the Supreme Court had to issue a conclusion that did not favor one party over another. Only the judicial branch has the right to pronounce something constitutional or unconstitutional, upholding the principle of separation of powers.Learn more about the cases of Shaw v. Reno: https://brainly.com/question/28222809
#SPJ13
in the 1900s how many pilgrims we're at the festival during Steve's performance
Answer: they're was 45 people at the festival during Steve's performance counting Reginald, who was a little bit of an outcast but I think he counts as one of them
Explanation:
5. What scientific evidence is used today that is helping scientists piece together the story of
modern man's migration across the world?
Answer:
Scientists trace the path of human migrations by using bones, artifacts and DNA. Ancient objects, however, are hard to find. DNA from contemporary humans can be compared to determine how long an indigenous population has lived in a region.
Explanation:
In your opinion, what group (African American, Native American, Woman, Wealthy White Man, or Poor White man) had the most to lose by going to war with Britain? Explain
Answer:
If we're talking about the revolution, I would say that the Native Americans had it the worst. Being already hurt by the French and Indian War, it only makes matters worse by having the white colonists drag them on with the Rev. War.
Explanation:
what does a mother have to do to leave her baby at sister irene’s asylum
In order to be able to leaver a baby at Sister Irene's Asylum, a mother would have to nurse her baby and someone else's baby as well.
What was Sister Irene's Asylum?Sister Irene's Asylum was a place in the book, "How the Other Half Lives" where women would often leave their children if they were unable to take care of them.
Sister Irene's Asylum had rules for leaving children however. If a mother felt she couldn't take care of her baby and had to leave them at the Asylum, the nurse there would first ask that the woman nurse her baby and someone else's baby. This was not enforced but was appreciated as it would feed another child.
Find out more on How the Other Half Lives at https://brainly.com/question/8512920
#SPJ1
Explain how colonialism and trade have had a significant historical impact on cultural diffusion.
"Psychocultural marginality," or losing one's cultural identity and experiencing social and emotional disarray, is one effect of colonization.
Briefing:-People suffer from historical trauma and cultural alienation when their traditional culture, values, and customs are denied to them (Dall, 2011).
What historical factors led to the spread of culture?The formation of Lingua is evidence of the connectivity between languages that was made possible by the historical diffusion of religion, language, and other cultural features due to major migrations, travel, colonization, ostracism, and other human interactions.
How did trade and colonialism influence cultural patterns?Two or more cultures are exposed to one another through colonialism, imperialism, and trade and are compelled to interact. This can result in cultural patterns and practices being shaped through assimilation, acculturation, and in some cases, cultural appropriation.
To Know more about appropriation.
https://brainly.com/question/14208387
#SPJ13
what is the rule of Addis Ababa
Addis Ababa is frequently referred to as the political capital of Africa. It is home to the African Union headquarters, has the third largest United Nations population, and has practically every foreign embassy in the world represented there.
The Addis Ababa Agreement accomplished what?The First Sudanese Civil War (1955–1972) fighting in Sudan came to an end in 1972 with the signing of the Addis Ababa Agreement, also known as the Addis Ababa Accord. The Sudanese Constitution includes the Addis Ababa Accords. The Member of the Council of Ministers is proposed by the Prime Minister and must have a two-thirds vote of the House of People's Representatives to be approved. Meles Zenawi, who led the FDRE from 1995 to 2012, was its first prime minister. Abiy Ahmed has been the prime minister since April 2018.Haile Selassie I ruled Ethiopia from 1930 to 1974 and is remembered for his modernization efforts, his role in the creation of the Organization of African Unity (now the African Union), his exile (1936–41), and his overthrow in 1974.To Learn more About Addis Ababa rule, Refer:
https://brainly.com/question/16782388
#SPJ9
. Explain the 5 factors that ultimately caused the United States to declare war on Spain?
PLEASEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
Some of the factors that ultimately caused the United States to declare war on Spain includes:
support against struggle by Cubanssupport against struggle by Filipinos explosion of the battleship U.S.S. Mainesocial reasonseconomic reasonspolitical reasons.What was the Spanish-American war?In history. the Spanish-American war referred to military conflict between Spain and the United States that began aftermath of the internal explosion of USS Maine in Havana Harbor in Cuba and which lead to United States intervention in the Cuban War of Independence..
One of the importance of the Spanish-American war was that its moved the United States into the position of a World Power because the United States acquired Spanish territories in the Caribbean and the Pacific.
Read more about Spanish - American War
brainly.com/question/10443525
#SPJ1
Does Upham offer any explanation in this passage why the adults in the Salem community took the girls seriously?
Upham provides an explanation for why the elders in the Salem community took the girls' claims seriously by stating that the adults were unaware of the circumstances.
This is further explained below.
Salem community took the girls seriously:Generally, The majority of those who testified against defendants in the Salem witch trials went on to lead lives that were rather typical.
At some point in time, Betty Parris, Elizabeth Booth, Sarah Churchill, Mary Walcott, and Mercy Lewis all tied the knot and had children of their own. There is no indication in the available records as to what became to Mary Warren, Susannah Sheldon, Elizabeth Hubbard, or Abigail Williams.
In conclusion, Upham presents an explanation for why the adults in the Salem community took the girls' accusations seriously by suggesting that the adults were uninformed of the conditions. He does this by saying that the adults took the girls' statements seriously because they believed them.
Read more about Salem community
https://brainly.com/question/19561821
#SPJ1
In 1-3 paragraphs explain what kind of person you think the president should be? Give at least three characteristics you think a person elected president should have. Why do you think those characteristics are important?
A president is our leader and someone who we should be able to trust. As American citizens we are able to elect our leader and therefore decide for ourselves who is good enough to lead us. To me, a President should have great integrity, be transparent to the people, all the while be honest. These characteristics are important because you want to be sure that you can let someone lead the country and trust that we the people made the right choices. The President is the face of our country and the center of all foreign matters. If they are not transparent and honest, a lot of things could go wrong, externally and internally. Not only that but having good integrity puts people as ease and makes them trust a president more.
There are many other characteristics that a good president should have. Though not every one is perfect, no president can contain all the good qualities. There are definitely flaws. Even being too perfect is a flaw. At least having the characteristics of integrity, honesty, and transparency will be good enough.
Match the term with the appropriate definition. 1. capital goods factors from the environment used to achieve a goal 2. human resources products made to make other products and services 3. natural resources factors used to achieve a goal 4. productive resources quantity and quality of human effort to achieve a goal
Answer:
Explanation:capital goods-products made to make other products and services
human resources-quantity and quality of human effort to achieve a goal
natural resources-factors from the environment used to achieve a goal
productive resources-factors used to achieve a goal
The 1887 dawes act reflected américas desire to
The purpose of the 1887 Dawes Severalty Act was to incorporate Native Americans into white society as soon as feasible.
What was the 1887 Dawes Severalty Act?Act to extend the protection of the laws of the United States and the Territories over the Indians, to provide for the allocation of Lands in severalty to Indians on several reservations, and for other purposes.
Despite the fact that the Dawes Act was approved in 1887, it wasn't until later that it was "on a tribe-by-tribe basis" administered by the federal government. For instance, the Hunter Act, established by Congress in 1895, governed Dawes "among the Southern Ute."
The act's stated goals were to safeguard "the indigenous' property" and compel "their integration into the American mainstream." Burke Act amendments to the Dawes Act were made once again in 1906. On June 18, 1934, the US Indian Reorganization Act was approved by the Franklin D. Roosevelt administration during the Great Depression.
Learn more about the 1887 Dawes Severalty Act, here
https://brainly.com/question/11296701
#SPJ1
CIVICS
Why did delegates of smaller states support the New Jersey Plan at the Constitutional Convention?
The New Jersey Plan included a bicameral legislature.
The New Jersey Plan left power in the hands of the states.
The New Jersey Plan divided the central government into three branches.
The New Jersey Plan gave all states the same number of representatives.
The reason why the New Jersey Plan came to be supported by the delegates from smaller states was that The New Jersey Plan gave all states the same number of representatives.
What was the New Jersey Plan?The Constitutional Convention was called to decide on a new constitution for the United States in order to replace the weak national government under the Articles of Confederation.
In this Convention, various suggestions were made for the type of legislative that the United States should have. One of those plans was called the New Jersey Plan.
The New Jersey Plan was that the United States legislative would be a single House and that all states would have a single vote. The delegates from the smaller states were massively in support of this because it meant that even though they were smaller than other states, they would still get an equal say in the legislative.
Find out more on the New Jersey Plan at https://brainly.com/question/5956921
#SPJ1
Which two of the following statements explain weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation?
a,The states did not have to comply with requests from the federal government.
b,The states were allowed to raise taxes but the federal government was not.
c, There was no legislative branch of the federal government.
d,The individual states had no power compared to the federal government.
The following statements explain the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation:
b, The states were allowed to raise taxes but the federal government was not.
d, The individual states had no power compared to the federal government.
Every country most effective had one vote in Congress, no matter its size. Congress had no longer have the strength to tax. Congress did no longer have the energy to alter foreign and interstate trade. There has been no govt department to implement any acts surpassed by way of Congress.
The Articles of Confederation served because the written document that established the features of the countrywide government of the USA after it declared independence from splendid Britain.
Learn more about Articles of Confederation here https://brainly.com/question/10100517
#SPJ1
Please Help it would mean A lot to me
Answer:
D
Explanation:
Like the states today, each colony was run by a government headed by a governor and a legislature.
(I searched this up! Just in case! I hope it helps!)
How old do you have to be in order to be elected to the following positions?
House of Representatives:
Senate:
President:
why are tuning points important in the process of periodization?
The Qin Dynasty was infamous for having a culture of crushing political or philosophical dissent. Does the United States government or its citizens have a similar mentality? Why or why not?
In accordance with Chinese political theory, a monarch should be removed if he or she has forfeited the Mandate of Heaven.
What Qin Dynasty was infamous?In the extremely patriarchal Qin society, men predominated in both the home and the government. Government and family have an impact on religion as well.
While many people worshiped gods or goddesses, ancestor worship or ceremonies that emphasized submission to the State were given more importance.
Therefore, Qin Dynasty was infamous for having a culture of crushing political or philosophical dissent.
Learn more about Qin Dynasty here:
https://brainly.com/question/1149953
#SPJ1
Remembering that the Latin prefix in- means “not,” and the Latin root cred means “believe or trust,” use this knowledge to determine the meaning of incredulous. Write your definition of incredulous here and tell how you figured it out. Use a print or digital dictionary to verify your meaning.
The opposite of credulous, which denotes "believing too readily," is incredulous. The Latin word credere, which means "to believe," is the root of both words.
What do you mean by incredulous?Incredulous is the reverse of credulous, which means "believing too quickly." Both words derive from the Latin word credere, which meaning "to believe."
The opposite of credulous, which denotes "believing too readily," is incredulous. The Latin word credere, which means "to believe," is the root of both words.
When you are skeptical of something, you are unsure but haven't ruled it out, however when you are incredulous, you refuse to believe it.
Learn more about incredulous, here
https://brainly.com/question/27839182
#SPJ1
