Why y’all make it so difficult

To find the percentage rate of change of f(x) at x=9, we first need to calculate the derivative of f(x). Using the power rule of differentiation, we get: f'(x) = 32.

This means that the rate of change of f(x) is constant and equal to 32. To find the percentage rate of change at x=9, we can calculate the ratio of the change in f(x) to the original value of f(x), and then multiply by 100 to get the percentage.
So, the change in f(x) from x=9 to x=9+Δx is: f(9+Δx) - f(9) = 32Δx. And the original value of f(x) at x=9 is: f(9) = 126 + 32(9) = 414.

Therefore, the percentage rate of change of f(x) at x=9 is: [(32Δx)/414] x 100, Note that the value of Δx is not given, so we cannot calculate the exact percentage rate of change without more information. However, we know that the rate of change is constant and equal to 32, which means that the percentage rate of change will also be constant.

To know more about value click here

brainly.com/question/30760879

#SPJ11

The area of the figure, with each square equaling 1 cm, is C- 36 cm squared.

The area refers to the space occupied by a two-dimensional object.

The area of a shape can be determined by counting the number of squares affected.

The area is usually stated in squared units, for example, meters, centimeters, etc.

For a rectangular or square object, the area is the product of the length and the width.

Thus, since there are about 36 squares in the given figure, the area is Option C.

Learn more about the area at https://brainly.com/question/2607596.

#SPJ1

The formula DayN = (DayT + N) mod 7 is used to calculate the day of the week for a given day (DayT) after N days. The term "mod" refers to the modulus operator, which gives the remainder of the division of two numbers. In this case, the result of the formula will be a number between 0 and 6, representing the day of the week, with 0 being Sunday and 6 being Saturday.

For general values of DayT and N, the formula can be justified by considering the fact that there are seven days in a week, and that the days repeat in a cycle. Adding N days to a given day (DayT) will result in a new day that is N days ahead in the cycle. Taking the modulus of this number with 7 will give the remainder of the division by 7, which is the same as finding the day of the week for the new day.

For example, if DayT is Monday (represented by 1) and N is 10, adding N to DayT gives 11. Taking the modulus of 11 with 7 gives a remainder of 4, which represents Thursday. Therefore, the formula is valid for general values of DayT and N, and can be used to calculate the day of the week for any given day after a certain number of days.

Learn more about : Modulus Operator - https://brainly.com/question/31426743

#SPJ11

Expanding along the first column, the determinant of the given matrix is -cos(0) * sin(0).

The given matrix is:

\left[\begin{array}{ccc}tan(0)&sin(0)&cos(8)\\cos(0)&0&-sin(0) \\sin(0)&cos(8) &0\end{array}\right] \\

Expanding along the first column, we get:

det = tan(0) *

(0 * cos(8) - sin(0) * cos(0))- cos(0) *(sin(0) * cos(8) - cos(0) * 0)+ sin(0) *  (sin(0) * 0 - cos(0) * cos(8))

Simplifying, we get:

det = 0 - cos(0) * sin(0) + 0

det = -cos(0) * sin(0)

Therefore, the determinant of the given matrix is -cos(0) * sin(0).

To practice more questions on determinants:

https://brainly.com/question/16981628

#SPJ11

According to Dr. Rick Malone, the best source of data for making inferences as to how dangerous persons of interest actually are may be a combination of various sources. These sources could include the person's criminal history, mental health records, and other indicators such as previous acts of violence or threats made towards others.

It is important to gather as much information as possible before making any conclusions about an individual's level of danger.
In addition to these sources, Dr. Malone also emphasizes the importance of utilizing technology and artificial intelligence to aid in the assessment process. This could involve using algorithms to analyze social media activity or other online behavior that may be indicative of potential danger.
It is crucial to approach the process of assessing an individual's level of danger with caution and to recognize that no single factor should be used to make a definitive determination. Rather, a comprehensive approach that takes into account a multitude of factors is necessary in order to accurately assess the potential risk posed by a person of interest. By utilizing a combination of sources and incorporating technological advancements, it is possible to gather a more complete picture of an individual's behavior and make informed decisions about how best to manage any potential threats.

For more questions on data

https://brainly.com/question/518894

#SPJ11

β = (x1 + x2 + ... + xn)/n this means that the maximum likelihood estimate of β is simply the sample mean.

To estimate β by the method of maximum likelihood, we first need to write down the likelihood function for the given random sample from the exponential distribution. The likelihood function L(β) is the product of the individual density functions:
L(β) = ∏[f(x_i)] = ∏[(1/β)e^(-x_i/β)] for i = 1, 2, ..., n.
Next, we will find the natural logarithm of L(β) to simplify calculations:
ln(L(β)) = ln[∏(1/β)e^(-x_i/β)] = ∑[ln((1/β)e^(-x_i/β))] for i = 1, 2, ..., n.
Now, we can differentiate ln(L(β)) with respect to β and set the result to 0 to find the maximum likelihood estimate:
d(ln(L(β))/dβ = 0
After solving for β, we obtain the maximum likelihood estimator for β:
β_hat = (1/n) * ∑(x_i) for i = 1, 2, ..., n.
This estimator is the sample mean of the random sample from the exponential distribution.

To estimate β by the method of maximum likelihood, we need to first write the likelihood function for the sample.
The likelihood function is given by L(β) = f(x1; β) * f(x2; β) * ... * f(xn; β), where f(xi; β) is the density function for each observation in the sample.
Substituting the density function for the exponential distribution, we get:
L(β) = (1/β)e^(-x1/β) * (1/β)e^(-x2/β) * ... * (1/β)e^(-xn/β)
Taking the natural logarithm of both sides, we get:
ln L(β) = -nln(β) - (1/β)(x1 + x2 + ... + xn)
To find the maximum likelihood estimate of β, we need to differentiate ln L(β) with respect to β and set it equal to zero:
d/dβ [ln L(β)] = -n/β + (x1 + x2 + ... + xn)/β² = 0
Solving for β, we get:
β = (x1 + x2 + ... + xn)/n
This means that the maximum likelihood estimate of β is simply the sample mean.
In summary, to estimate β by the method of maximum likelihood for a random sample from an exponential distribution, we use the likelihood function, take the natural logarithm, differentiate with respect to β, set it equal to zero, and solve for β. The maximum likelihood estimate of β is the sample mean.

Learn more about the sample mean here: brainly.com/question/31101410

#SPJ11

The partial derivative is: zero.

We have the function:

f(x,y) = x³ * 5xy * y²

and we are given that x = r cosθ and y = r sinθ.

We can substitute these expressions into the function f to get:

f(r,θ) = (r cosθ)³ * 5(r cosθ)(r sinθ) * (r sinθ)²

Simplifying this expression, we get:

f(r,θ) = 5r⁶ cos³θ sin³θ

To find ∂f/∂θ, we take the partial derivative of f with respect to θ while treating r as a constant:

∂f/∂θ = 5r⁶ [3cos²θsin⁴θ - 3cos⁴θsin²θ]

Now we can evaluate this expression at r = 3 and θ = π:

∂f/∂θ(r=3,θ=π) = 5(3⁶) [3cos²πsin⁴π - 3cos⁴πsin²π]

Simplifying further, we get:

∂f/∂θ(r=3,θ=π) = 0

Therefore, the partial derivative of f with respect to θ when r = 3 and θ = π is zero.

Learn more about partial derivative

brainly.com/question/31397807

#SPJ11

Answer:

≈ 35,53 m

Step-by-step explanation:

Given:

∠GCM = 76° (central angle, which is equal to the arc on which it rests on)

arc FG = 7,5 m

Find: C (circumference) - ?

The whole circle forms an angle of 360°

Since we don't know the length of the radius, we can make a proportion to find C:

76° - 7,5 m

360° - C m

Cross-multiply to find C:

[tex]c = \frac{360° \times 7.5}{76°} ≈35.53 \: m[/tex]

The final answer is y_p(x) = (1/2)x^2 - 7x + 7

To solve the given differential equation y(4) + 2y'' + y = (x - 3)^2 by the method of undetermined coefficients, we first identify the general form of the particular solution based on the non-homogeneous term (x - 3)^2.
Since the non-homogeneous term is a polynomial of degree 2, we assume the particular solution to be of the form:

y_p(x) = Ax^2 + Bx + C

Now, we need to find the first, second, and fourth derivatives of y_p(x) to plug into the given differential equation.
y_p'(x) = 2Ax + B
y_p''(x) = 2A
y_p'''(x) = 0
y_p(4)(x) = 0

Substitute these derivatives into the given differential equation:
0 + 2(2A) + (Ax^2 + Bx + C) = (x - 3)^2

Simplify the equation:
2Ax^2 + (2A + B)x + (4A + C) = x^2 - 6x + 9

Now, we compare coefficients of the corresponding terms:
2A = 1 → A = 1/2
2A + B = -6 → B = -6 - 2(1/2) = -7
4A + C = 9 → C = 9 - 4(1/2) = 7

So, the particulay_p(x)r solution is:
y_p(x) = (1/2)x^2 - 7x + 7

The general solution y(x) consists of the sum of the complementary function y_c(x) and the particular solution y_p(x). For this specific problem, the complementary function is not provided.

However, the particular solution is:
y_p(x) = (1/2)x^2 - 7x + 7

To learn more about differential equations, visit https://brainly.in/question/54118694

#SPJ11

Iterated integral by converting to polar coordinates is:

3/64 [tex]a^5[/tex] (π - 16).

The integral should be:

∫∫_R [tex]6x^2y\sqrt{a^2 - y^2)}[/tex] dA,

where R is the region in the first quadrant bounded by the x-axis,

the y-axis, and the curve [tex]x^2 + y^2 = a^2.[/tex]

To evaluate this integral using polar coordinates, we need to convert the integrand and the limits of integration.

Recall that in polar coordinates, x = r cos θ and y = r sin θ, and the area element is dA = r dr dθ.

So the integral becomes:

∫₀π/2 ∫₀a cos θ 6(r cos θ)^2 (r sin θ) √(a^2 - (r sin θ)^2) r dr dθ

Simplifying the integrand:

∫₀π/2 ∫₀[tex]a 6r^4 cos^3[/tex] θ sin θ [tex]\sqrt{(a^2 - r^2 sin^2 }[/tex]θ) dr dθ

Using the substitution[tex]u = a^2 - r^2 sin^2[/tex] θ, du = -2r sin θ cos θ dθ:

∫₀π/2 ∫_{[tex]a^2[/tex]}a^2 - [tex]sin^2[/tex]θ [tex]a^2 - u 6(a^2 - u)^(3/2)[/tex]du dθ /

([tex]4 sin^3[/tex] θ)

Using the substitution [tex]v = \sqrt{(a^2 - u) }[/tex],

dv = -du / (2v):

∫₀π/2 ∫₀[tex]a cos^3[/tex] θ [tex]6(a^2 - v^2)^2 v[/tex] dv dθ / 4

Using the substitution[tex]u = a^2 - v^2, du = -2v dv:[/tex]

3/8 ∫₀π/2 ∫₀[tex]a^2 (a^2 - u)^2 u^(1/2)[/tex]du dθ

Using the substitution u = [tex]a^2 cos^2[/tex] φ, du

[tex]= -a^2 sin 2[/tex]φ dφ:

3/8 [tex]a^5[/tex]∫₀π/2 [tex]sin^5[/tex] φ [tex]cos^4[/tex] φ dφ

This integral can be evaluated using integration by parts, but the calculations are quite tedious.

For similar question on integral.

https://brainly.com/question/28157330

#SPJ11

Y_1, Y_2, ..., Y_n are a random sample from a Laplace distribution with density function f(y|θ) = (1/2θ)e^(-|y|/θ) for -∞ < y < ∞, where θ > 0. The first two moments of the distribution are E(Y) = 0 and E(Y^2) = 2θ^2. The likelihood function of the sample is L(θ|y) = (1/2^nθ^n)e^(-∑|y_i|/θ).

a) The likelihood function is the product of the individual probability density functions for each observation. So, for a sample of size n, the likelihood function can be expressed as L(θ|y) = ∏(1/2θ)e^(-|y_i|/θ), i=1 to n. Simplifying this expression, we get L(θ|y) = (1/2^nθ^n)e^(-∑|y_i|/θ).

b) The sum of absolute values of the observations, ∑|y_i|, is a sufficient statistic for θ.

c) To find the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) of θ, we differentiate the likelihood function with respect to θ and set it equal to zero. Solving for θ, we get the MLE as θ = ∑|y_i|/n.

d) The standard deviation of the Laplace distribution is given by σ = √(2)θ. Therefore, the MLE of the standard deviation is √(2)(∑|y_i|/n).

e) The method of moments estimator of θ is obtained by equating the sample mean absolute deviation to the population mean absolute deviation, which gives θ = ∑|y_i|/n.

f) To show that the MLE of θ is a minimum variance unbiased estimator, we can use the Fisher information. The Fisher information for θ is given by I(θ) = n/θ^2. The variance of the MLE is then given by Var(θ) = 1/I(θ) = θ^2/n. Therefore, the MLE is unbiased and has minimum variance. The variance of Y is Var(Y) = 4θ^2, so Var(X) = Var(Y)/n = 4θ^2/n.

For more questions like Function click the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/16008229

#SPJ11

Answer: I believe C. 18a5 is the correct answer

(a) The null space of PA is a subset of the null space of A.

(b) The null space of [tex](AQ)^T[/tex] is a subset of the null space of AT.

(a) To prove that rank(PA) = r, we need to show that PA has the same null space as A.

Therefore, the null space of PA is a subset of the null space of A.

(b) To prove that rank(AQ) = r, we need to show that (AQ)T has the same null space as AT.

Therefore, the null space of AT is a subset of the null space of (AQ)^T.

Conversely, let y be a vector in the null space of [tex](AQ)^T[/tex].

Therefore, [tex]Q^{-T y}[/tex] is in the null space of AT. Therefore, the null space of [tex](AQ)^T[/tex] is a subset of the null space of AT.

Learn more about null space

brainly.com/question/17215829

#SPJ11

For the limit lim n→[infinity] n exi3 + xi Δxi = 1 on the interval [0, 9], the limit is equivalent to the definite integral integral_0⁹ ex³ + x dx. Similarly, for the limit lim n→[infinity] n xi6 + xi3 Δxi = 1 on the interval [2, 8], the limit is equivalent to the definite  integral_2⁸ x⁶ + x³ dx.

For the first problem:

We have the limit lim n→[infinity] n exi3 + xi Δxi = 1 on the interval [0, 9].

We can rewrite this limit as a definite integral using the formula:

integral_a^b f(x) dx = lim_n→[infinity] ∑[i=1 to n] f(xi) Δxi

where Δxi = (b-a)/n is the width of each sub-interval, and xi is any point in the ith sub-interval [xi-1, xi].

Using this formula, we have:

lim n→[infinity] n exi3 + xi Δxi = integral_0⁹ ex³ + x dx

For the second problem:

We have the limit lim n→[infinity] n xi6 + xi3 Δxi = 1 on the interval [2, 8].

Using the same formula as before, we have:

lim n→[infinity] n xi6 + xi3 Δxi = integral_2⁸ x⁶ + x³ dx.

To practice more questions definite  integral:

https://brainly.com/question/22008756

#SPJ11

The answer is finite.

This is because the probability model lists the probabilities for four distinct and mutually exclusive outcomes (Republican, Independent, Democrat, and Other) and the sum of these probabilities equals 1.

Therefore, the probability model is a finite model, as opposed to a continuous model which deals with probabilities over an infinite range of outcomes.

Learn more about probability: https://brainly.com/question/11234923

#SPJ11

Answer:

[tex]9.27 \times {10}^{6} [/tex]

C is correct.

Out of the given functions, g(x), h(x), and k(x) satisfy the extreme value theorem, and guarantee the existence of an absolute maximum and minimum value over the given interval.

Now, let's apply the extreme value theorem to the given functions:

f(x) = ln(1 - x) over [0,2]: This function is not continuous on the given interval since it is undefined at x = 1. Therefore, the extreme value theorem does not apply to this function.

g(x) = ln(1 + x) over [0,2]: This function is continuous on the given interval, and its derivative is always positive, which means it is an increasing function. Therefore, the absolute minimum value occurs at x = 0 and the absolute maximum value occurs at x = 2. Hence, the extreme value theorem applies to this function.

h(x) = √1 - x over [1,4]: This function is continuous on the given interval, and its derivative is always negative, which means it is a decreasing function. Therefore, the absolute maximum value occurs at x = 1 and the absolute minimum value occurs at x = 4. Hence, the extreme value theorem applies to this function.

k(x) = 1/√1 - x over [1,4]: This function is continuous on the given interval, and its derivative is always negative, which means it is a decreasing function. Therefore, the absolute maximum value occurs at x = 1 and the absolute minimum value occurs at x = 4. Hence, the extreme value theorem applies to this function.

To know more about function here

https://brainly.com/question/12431044

#SPJ4

there is no solution for this trapezoid with the given information.

How to solve trapezoid?

We can use the fact that the sum of the interior angles of a quadrilateral is 360 degrees to solve this problem. We also know that the opposite angles of a trapezoid are equal.

Let angle R be x degrees. Then, we can find angle S as follows:

Angle T = 105 degrees

Angles T and S are opposite, so angle S = angle T = 105 degrees

The sum of the interior angles of triangle RST is 180 degrees, so:

Angle R + Angle S + Angle T = 180 degrees

Substituting the values we know:

x + 105 + 180 - 2x = 180

Simplifying:

x - 2x = 0

-x = 0

x = 0

This is not a valid solution since angle R cannot be zero degrees.

Instead, we can use the fact that the two base angles of a trapezoid are equal to each other. Let the base angles be y degrees each. Then:

y + y + 105 + x = 360

2y + x = 255

We also know that the sum of the angles of triangle RQS is 180 degrees, so:

y + x = 75

Solving for y in terms of x and substituting into the equation from the trapezoid:

2(y + x) + x = 255

2(75 - x) + x = 255

150 - x + x = 255

150 = 255

This is a contradiction, so there is no solution for this trapezoid with the given information.

To know more about Trapezoid visit :-

https://brainly.com/question/1410008

#SPJ1

The area of triangle ABC is estimated  130.7 cm².

Applying Heron's formula, which states that the area of a triangle with sides a, b, and c is given by:

area = √[s(s - a)(s - b)(s - c)]

AC = 7 cm

BC + AB = 28

BC - AB = 4

BC + AB = 28

BC - AB = 4

2BC = 32

BC = 16

Substituting BC = 16 into one of the equations, we get:

AB = BC - 4 = 16 - 4 = 12

We then  find the semi_perimeter s:

s = (AC + AB + BC)/2 = (7 + 12 + 16)/2 = 17.5

We now apply  Heron's formula to find the area:

area = √[s(s - AC)(s - AB)(s - BC)]

= √[17.5(17.5 - 7)(17.5 - 12)(17.5 - 16)]

= √[17.5(10.5)(5.5)(1.5)]

= √17062.5

≈ 130.7 cm²

Learn more about Heron's formula at: https://brainly.com/question/10713495

#SPJ1

The flux of vector field ⃑ across the surface S is 5π.

To find the flux of vector field ⃑ across the given surface, we need to use the surface integral of the dot product of ⃑ and the unit normal vector ⃑:

∫∫ ⃑ ⋅ ⃑ dS

where the integral is taken over the surface S bounded by the cylinder 2 2 = 1 and planes = 0 and = 2.

To evaluate this integral, we first need to parameterize the surface S. One way to do this is to use cylindrical coordinates, where

= cos ⁡
= sin ⁡
=

with 0 ≤  ≤ 2π and 0 ≤  ≤ 2.

Then the position vector ⃑( , , ) of a point on the surface S can be expressed as

⃑( , , ) =  cos ⁡   sin ⁡  +  5

The unit normal vector ⃑ at each point on the surface S can be calculated using the cross product of the partial derivatives of the position vector with respect to the cylindrical coordinates:

⃑ = ∂⃑/∂  × ∂⃑/∂

= (-  sin ⁡ ,  cos ⁡ , 0) × ( cos ⁡  cos ⁡ ,  sin ⁡  sin ⁡ , 5)

= (5 cos ⁡ , 5 sin ⁡ , 1)

Note that this vector points outward from the surface S.

Now we can evaluate the flux integral:

∫∫ ⃑ ⋅ ⃑ dS = ∫0^2∫0^2π ⃑ ⋅ ⃑ d  d

= ∫0^2∫0^2π (⃑ ⋅ ⃑)r dr d

= ∫0^2∫0^2π (5 cos ⁡  cos ⁡  + 5 sin ⁡  sin ⁡ )r dr d

= ∫0^2∫0^2π 5r cos ⁡  cos ⁡  + 5r sin ⁡  sin ⁡  dr d

= 5∫0^2∫0^2π r cos ⁡  cos ⁡  + r sin ⁡  sin ⁡  dr d

Using the symmetry of the integrand, we can simplify this as

= 5∫0^2∫0^2π r cos ⁡  cos ⁡  dr d

= 5∫0^2∫0^2π r sin ⁡  sin ⁡  dr d

Using the substitution u = 2 2 r2, we can evaluate each of these integrals:

= 5∫0^2∫0^2π u/2 cos ⁡  d  d

= 5∫0^2 u/2  d

= 5π

The flux of vector field ⃑ across the surface S is 5π.

To learn more about flux visit:

brainly.com/question/14527109

#SPJ11

a. The radius of the cylinder is 5.13 inches.

b. The radius will change in opposite to the height.

What is a cylinder?

One of the most fundamental curvilinear geometric shapes, the cylinder, has long been thought of as a three-dimensional solid. In basic geometry, it is regarded as a prism with a circle as its base.

a. We are given volume of cylinder as 894 cubic inches and the height is 10.8 inches.

So, we get

⇒ Volume = π[tex]r^{2}[/tex]h

⇒ 894 = 3.14 * [tex]r^{2}[/tex] * 10.8

⇒ 894 = 33.912 * [tex]r^{2}[/tex]

⇒ [tex]r^{2}[/tex]  = 26.36

⇒ r  = 5.13 inches

b. If the height of the cylinder is​ changed, but the volume stays the​ same, then the radius will change inversely. This means with increase in height, radius will decrease and vice versa.

Hence, the required solution have been obtained.

Learn more about cylinder from the given link

https://brainly.com/question/27440983

#SPJ1

Answer:

A

Step-by-step explanation:

It will take Mthwetew and Andy 1.875 days to build the block wall if they work together.

Hello! I understand that you'd like to know how long it will take Mthwetew and Andy to build a block wall if they work together. To answer this question, we will use the concept of work rates.
Mthwetew can build a wall in 3 days. This means Mthwetew's work rate is 1/3 (wall/day).
Andy can build the same wall in 5 days. This means Andy's work rate is 1/5 (wall/day).
To find out how long it will take them to build the wall together, we will add their work rates and solve for the time it would take them to complete the task.
Combined work rate: (1/3) + (1/5)
To add these fractions, find a common denominator, which in this case is 15.
(1/3) * (5/5) = 5/15
(1/5) * (3/3) = 3/15
Now, add the numerators:
5/15 + 3/15 = 8/15 (wall/day)
Their combined work rate is 8/15 (wall/day). To find out how long it takes them to build the wall together, we need to calculate the reciprocal of their combined work rate:
15/8 = 1.875 days
So, it will take Mthwetew and Andy 1.875 days to build the block wall if they work together.

for more questions on days

https://brainly.com/question/24900258

#SPJ11

First, let's define what an involutory matrix is. An involutory matrix is a square matrix that when multiplied by itself yields the identity matrix. In other words, if A is an involutory matrix, then A^2 = I, where I is the identity matrix.

Now, let's consider a 2x2 involutory matrix modulo m. Let's call this matrix A. Since A is involutory, we know that A^2 = I. We can write this as A^2 - I = 0.

Next, let's calculate the determinant of A. We know that det A = ad - bc, where a, b, c, and d are the elements of the matrix A. Since A is 2x2, we can write this as:
det A = a*d - b*c

Now, we can use the fact that A^2 - I = 0 to simplify this expression. We can write:
det A = det(A^2 - I) = det(A^2) - det(I)

Since A is involutory, we know that A^2 = I, so we can substitute that in:
det A = det(I) - det(I) = 0

So, we have shown that det A = 0. This means that det A is a multiple of m. In other words, det A = km for some integer k.

Now, we need to prove or disprove that det A = -1 (mod m). We can rewrite this as:
det A ≡ -1 (mod m)

This means that det A and -1 have the same remainder when divided by m. In other words, det A - (-1) is divisible by m.

Let's substitute det A = km into this expression:
km - (-1) = km + 1

We need to show that km + 1 is divisible by m. This is true if and only if k is not divisible by m.
If k is divisible by m, then km + 1 is not divisible by m. Therefore, det A ≢ -1 (mod m).
If k is not divisible by m, then km + 1 is divisible by m. Therefore, det A ≡ -1 (mod m).

So, the answer to the question is that if a is a 2x2 involutory matrix modulo m, then det a ≡ -1 (mod m) if and only if k is not divisible by m.

Learn more about involuntary matrix, here:

brainly.com/question/17183952

#SPJ11

Answer:

[tex]r = 3 \frac{1}{4} [/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Given:

h = 2

U = 16,5

[tex]u = \pi(r + h)[/tex]

[tex] \frac{22}{7} (r + 2) = 16.5[/tex]

Multiply both sides of the equation by 7 to eliminate the fraction:

[tex]22(r + 2) = 115.5[/tex]

Expand the brackets:

[tex]22r + 44 = 115.5[/tex]

Collect like-terms:

[tex]22r = 71.5[/tex]

Divide both sides of the equation by 22 to make r the subject:

[tex]r = 3.25 = 3 \frac{1}{4} [/tex]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex] 16\frac{1}{2} = \frac{22}{7} (r + 2)[/tex]

[tex] \frac{33}{2} = \frac{22}{7} (r + 2)[/tex]

[tex]231 = 44(r + 2)[/tex]

[tex]231 = 44r + 88[/tex]

[tex]143 = 44r[/tex]

[tex]3.25 = r[/tex]

Both AB and BA exists and AB = [30] and BA= [tex]\left[\begin{array}{cccc}1&2&3&4\\2&4&6&8\\3&6&9&12\\4&8&12&16\end{array}\right][/tex]

To multiply two matrices we need to check if the number of columns of first matrix is equal to number of rows in second matrix. Then the multiplication exists.

Hence the order of the resulting matrix formed will be equal to number of rows of first matrix and number of columns of second matrix.

Thus AB exists since, Number of columns in matrix A = Number of rows in matrix B.

Therefore, AB = [ 1 2 3 4 ] [tex]\left[\begin{array}{ccc}1\\2\\3\\4\end{array}\right][/tex]

⇒AB = [ (1)(1) +(2)(2) +(3)(3) + (4)(4)]

⇒ AB = [ 1+ 4+ 9+ 16]

⇒AB = [30]

Thus BA exists since, Number of columns in matrix B = Number of rows in matrix A.

Therefore, BA =[tex]\left[\begin{array}{ccc}1\\2\\3\\4\end{array}\right][/tex] [ 1 2 3 4 ]

⇒BA = [tex]\left[\begin{array}{cccc}(1)(1)&(1)(2)&(1)(3)&(1)(4)\\(2)(1)&(2)(2)&(2)(3)&(2)(4)\\(3)(1)&(3)(2)&(3)(3)&(3)(4)\\(4)(1)&(4)(2)&(4)(3)&(4)(4)\end{array}\right][/tex][tex]{4*4}[/tex]

⇒BA= [tex]\left[\begin{array}{cccc}1&2&3&4\\2&4&6&8\\3&6&9&12\\4&8&12&16\end{array}\right][/tex]

To know more about multiplication of matrices here

https://brainly.com/question/29712501

#SPJ4

The approximate change in volume of the spherical snowball is about 64.9 cubic cm

To find the approximate change in volume of a spherical snowball, we can use the formula V = (4/3)πr^3, where V is the volume and r is the radius.

If the radius decreases from 4 cm to 3.7 cm, we can plug in these values to find the initial and final volumes:

Initial volume: V1 = (4/3)π(4^3) ≈ 268.1 cubic cm
Final volume: V2 = (4/3)π(3.7^3) ≈ 203.2 cubic cm

To find the approximate change in volume, we can subtract the final volume from the initial volume:

ΔV ≈ V1 - V2
ΔV ≈ 268.1 - 203.2
ΔV ≈ 64.9

The approximate change in volume of the spherical snowball is about 64.9 cubic cm.

To learn more about volume visit:

brainly.com/question/1578538

#SPJ11

A) First, we need to find the first derivative of y with respect to x:

dy/dx = (2t) / (3t^2 - 12)

To find the second derivative of y with respect to x, we need to differentiate dy/dx with respect to t and then divide by dx/dt:

d(dy/dx)/dt = d/dt[(2t) / (3t^2 - 12)]

= (6t^2 - 24) / (3t^2 - 12)^2

d^2y/dx^2 = [d(dy/dx)/dt] / dx/dt

= [(6t^2 - 24) / (3t^2 - 12)^2] / (3t^2 - 12)

= -(6t^2 + 24) / (3t^2 - 12)^3

So, the second derivative of y with respect to x is -6(t^2 + 4)/(t^2 - 4)^3.

B) To determine when the curve is concave upward, we need to find the values of t for which the second derivative is positive. We can simplify the expression for the second derivative by factoring out a -6 from the numerator:

d^2y/dx^2 = -6(t^2 + 4)/(t^2 - 4)^3

Since the numerator t^2 + 4 is always positive, we only need to look at the denominator (t^2 - 4)^3. The denominator is positive except at t = ±2. Therefore, the curve is concave upward for all values of t except t = ±2.

So, the final answer is:

A) dy/dx = (2t) / (3t^2 - 12)

d^2y/dx^2 = -(6t^2 + 24) / (3t^2 - 12)^3

B) The curve is concave upward for all values of t except t = ±2.

Learn more about the differentiation/derivative:

https://brainly.com/question/27899199

#SPJ11

To show that a | b if and only if da | db, we need to prove both directions.

First, let's assume that a | b. This means that there exists an integer k such that b = ak. Multiplying both sides by d, we get db = dak. Since d ≠ 0, we can divide both sides by d to get db/d = ak. But since d ≠ 0, we know that da ≠ 0, so we can multiply both sides by da/d to get da/d * db/d = da/d * ak. Simplifying, we get da | db.

Now let's assume that da | db. This means that there exists an integer m such that db = dam. Since d ≠ 0, we can divide both sides by d to get b = am. But this is the definition of a | b, so we have shown that a | b if and only if da | db.

In conclusion, we have proven that a | b if and only if da | db, using the fact that multiplication and division by non-zero integers preserves divisibility.

In order to show that a | b if and only if da | db, we'll need to prove both directions:

1. If a | b, then da | db: Since a | b, there exists an integer z such that b = az. Multiplying both sides by d, we get db = daz. Let e = dz, so db = ae. Since there exists an integer e such that db = ae, we conclude that da | db.

2. If da | db, then a | b: Given that da | db, there exists an integer z such that db = daz. Since d ≠ 0, we can divide both sides by d, resulting in b = az. This shows that there exists an integer z such that b = az, which means a | b.

Therefore, a | b if and only if da | db.

Learn more about Number Theory here: brainly.com/question/30414700

#SPJ11

We use contraposition to show that if x + y ≥ 2, where x and y are real numbers, then x ≥ 1 or y ≥ 1.

Step 1: Understand the original statement
The original statement is: If x + y ≥ 2, then x ≥ 1 or y ≥ 1.

Step 2: Write the contrapositive statement
The contrapositive statement is: If x < 1 and y < 1, then x + y < 2.

Step 3: Prove the contrapositive statement
Assume that x < 1 and y < 1 (our contrapositive statement).
Now we need to show that x + y < 2.

Since x < 1 and y < 1, we can add these two inequalities:
x < 1
y < 1
---------
x + y < 1 + 1

Therefore, x + y < 2.

Step 4: Conclusion
Since we have proven the contrapositive statement, the original statement is also true.

So, if x + y ≥ 2, where x and y are real numbers, then x ≥ 1 or y ≥ 1.

To learn more about “ inequalities” refer to the https://brainly.com/question/25275758

#SPJ11