The value of parabola in vertex form : y = (-1/2)*(x + 3)² + 6
Given,
Vertex (-3,6) , Point (1,-2) .
Here,
The vertex form of the equation of a parabola: y = a *(x-h)² + k where:
h is the x-coordinate of the vertex; k is the y-coordinate of the vertex
Let's plug them in to the above equation: y = a *(x- -3)² + 6 so y = a *(x + 3)² + 6
Point (1,-2) that's on that parabola, so now replace the x and y from the equation by 1 and -2 respectively:
-2 = a *(1 + 3)² + 6
-2 = a *(4)² + 6
-2 = a *16 + 6
Solve for a,
Subtract 6 from both sides: -8 = a*16
Divide both sides by 16: -8/16 = a -------> a = -1/2
Therefore, the equation of the parabola with vertex (-3,6) and point (1,-2) is:
y = (-1/2)*(x + 3)² + 6
Know more about parabola,
https://brainly.com/question/11911877
#SPJ4
Describe the difference between solving |x+3|>4 and |x+3|<4 .
The difference between solving |x+3|>4 and |x+3|<4 lies in the direction of the inequality and the resulting solution set.
In the first inequality, |x+3|>4, we are looking for values of x that make the absolute value of x+3 greater than 4. In the second inequality, |x+3|<4, we are looking for values of x that make the absolute value of x+3 less than 4. When solving |x+3|>4, we consider two cases: one where x+3 is positive and one where x+3 is negative. For x+3 > 0, we solve x+3 > 4, which gives x > 1.
For x+3 < 0, we solve -(x+3) > 4, which gives x < -7. Combining these two cases, the solution to |x+3|>4 is x < -7 or x > 1. On the other hand, when solving |x+3|<4, we consider two cases as well. For x+3 > 0, we solve x+3 < 4, which gives x < 1. For x+3 < 0, we solve -(x+3) < 4, which gives x > -7. Combining these two cases, the solution to |x+3|<4 is -7 < x < 1.
The difference between solving |x+3|>4 and |x+3|<4 lies in the direction of the inequality and the resulting solution set. The former involves values of x that make the absolute value greater than 4, while the latter involves values that make the absolute value less than 4. The solution set for |x+3|>4 is x < -7 or x > 1, while the solution set for |x+3|<4 is -7 < x < 1.
Learn more about solution here: brainly.com/question/1616939
#SPJ11
Perform the below calculations and round to the correct number of decimals/sig. figs. a. 12.5849+2.4 b. 432.5−24.3984 c. 246×1.5 d. 974.59/14.2
He answers rounded to the correct number of decimals/sig. figs are:a. 15.0 b. 408.1 c. 369 d. 68.65
a. 12.5849+2.4Adding 12.5849 and 2.4 gives: 15. 0 (rounded to one decimal place) b. 432.5−24.3984Subtracting 24.3984 from 432.5 gives: 408. 1 (rounded to one decimal place) c. 246×1.5Multiplying 246 and 1.5 gives: 369 (no rounding required) d. 974.59/14.2Dividing 974.59 by 14.2 gives: 68.65 (rounded to two decimal places)
for more search question rounded
https://brainly.com/question/30474527
#SPJ8
Determine the value of h in each translation. Describe each phase shift (use a phrase like 3 units to the left).
g(x)=f(x+1)
In the function g(x) = f(x + 1), the value of h is 1. This means that the graph of g(x) is shifted 1 unit to the left compared to the graph of f(x).
A horizontal translation of a function is a transformation that moves the graph of the function to the left or right by a certain number of units. In this case, the function g(x) is defined as f(x + 1). This means that for every input value x, the output value of g(x) is the same as the output value of f(x), but shifted one unit to the left.
For example, if x = 0, then g(0) = f(1). This means that the point (0, g(0)) on the graph of g(x) is the same point as the point (1, f(1)) on the graph of f(x).
The graph of g(x) is therefore shifted one unit to the left compared to the graph of f(x). This is because the input value x = 0 on the graph of g(x) corresponds to the input value x = 1 on the graph of f(x).
In conclusion, the value of h in g(x) = f(x + 1) is 1. This means that the graph of g(x) is shifted 1 unit to the left compared to the graph of f(x).
To learn more about function click here : brainly.com/question/30721594
#SPJ11
Inverse functions linear discrete
Answer:
[tex]\text{g}^{-1}(x)=\boxed{\dfrac{x-13}{2}}[/tex]
[tex]\left(\text{g}^{-1} \circ \text{g}\right)(-4)=\boxed{-4}[/tex]
[tex]h^{-1}(9)=\boxed{-3}[/tex]
Step-by-step explanation:
To find the inverse of function g(x) = 2x + 13, begin by replacing g(x) with y:
[tex]y=2x+13[/tex]
Swap x and y:
[tex]x=2y+13[/tex]
Rearrange to isolate y:
[tex]\begin{aligned}x&=2y+13\\\\x-13&=2y+13-13\\\\x-13&=2y\\\\2y&=x-13\\\\\dfrac{2y}{2}&=\dfrac{x-13}{2}\\\\y&=\dfrac{x-13}{2}\end{aligned}[/tex]
Replace y with g⁻¹(x):
[tex]\boxed{\text{g}^{-1}(x)=\dfrac{x-13}{2}}[/tex]
[tex]\hrulefill[/tex]
As g and g⁻¹ are true inverse functions of each other, the composite function (g⁻¹ o g)(x) will always yield x. Therefore, (g⁻¹ o g)(-4) = -4.
To prove this algebraically, calculate the original function g at the input value x = -4, and then evaluate the inverse function of g at the result.
[tex]\begin{aligned}\left(\text{g}^{-1} \circ \text{g}\right)(-4)&=\text{g}^{-1}\left[\text{g}(-4)\right]\\\\&=\text{g}^{-1}\left[2(-4)+13\right]\\\\&=\text{g}^{-1}\left[5\right]\\\\&=\dfrac{(5)-13}{2}\\\\&=\dfrac{-8}{2}\\\\&=-4\end{aligned}[/tex]
Hence proving that (g⁻¹ o g)(-4) = -4.
[tex]\hrulefill[/tex]
The inverse of a one-to-one function is obtained by reflecting the original function across the line y = x, which swaps the input and output values of the function. Therefore, (x, y) → (y, x).
Given the one-to-one function h is defined as:
[tex]h=\left\{(-3,9), (1,0), (3,-7), (5,2), (9,6)\right\}[/tex]
Then, the inverse of h is defined as:
[tex]h^{-1}=\left\{(9,-3),(0,1),(-7,3),(2,5),(6,9)\right\}[/tex]
Therefore, h⁻¹(9) = -3.
Suppose that the function g is defined, for all real numbers, as follows. g(x)={
{ -1/4 x^2 + 4 if x =−2
{-4 if x=−2
Find g(−4),g(−2), and g(0).
The values of g(-4), g(-2), and g(3) are -5, undefined, and -11, respectively. The function g is defined differently for x = -2 and other real numbers, resulting in different output values.
Given the function g(x) = {(-4/1)(x-2) - (1/1)(x+2), if x ≠ -2; undefined, if x = -2}, we can evaluate g(-4), g(-2), and g(3) as follows:
1. g(-4):
Since -4 ≠ -2, we use the first part of the definition of g(x). Plugging in x = -4, we have:
g(-4) = (-4/1)(-4-2) - (1/1)(-4+2)
= (-4/1)(-6) - (1/1)(-2)
= 24 + 2
= 26
Therefore, g(-4) = 26.
2. g(-2):
Since x = -2 matches the condition in the second part of the definition of g(x), g(-2) is undefined.
3. g(3):
Since 3 ≠ -2, we use the first part of the definition of g(x). Plugging in x = 3, we have:
g(3) = (-4/1)(3-2) - (1/1)(3+2)
= (-4/1)(1) - (1/1)(5)
= -4 - 5
= -9
Therefore, g(3) = -9.
In summary, g(-4) = 26, g(-2) is undefined, and g(3) = -9. The function g(x) has different output values depending on whether x is equal to -2 or not.
Learn more about real numbers here:
brainly.com/question/29052564
#SPJ11
Write the following statement in if-then form.
Equilateral triangles are equiangular.
If a triangle is equilateral, then it is equiangular.
The statement "Equilateral triangles are equiangular" is already in if-then form.
In if-then form, the statement can be written as "If a triangle is equilateral" (the "if" part), followed by "then it is equiangular" (the "then" part).
An equilateral triangle is a triangle in which all three sides are equal in length. Equiangular refers to a triangle having all three angles equal. The statement asserts that if a triangle is equilateral (the "if" condition), then it is also equiangular (the "then" consequence). This relationship holds true for equilateral triangles, making the statement accurate.
Visit here to learn more about equilateral brainly.com/question/2456591
#SPJ11
Determine whether each matrix has an inverse. If an inverse matrix exists, find it. If it does not exist, explain why not.
[4 7 3 5]
The given matrix [4 7; 3 5] has an inverse. The inverse matrix is [5 -7; -3 4].
To determine if a matrix has an inverse, we need to check if its determinant is nonzero. Let's denote the given matrix as A: A = [4 7; 3 5]
The determinant of A, denoted as det(A), can be calculated by cross-multiplying and subtracting: det(A) = (4 * 5) - (7 * 3)
= 20 - 21
= -1
Since the determinant is nonzero (-1 ≠ 0), the matrix A has an inverse.
To find the inverse matrix, we can use the formula:
[tex]A^(-1)[/tex]= (1/det(A)) * adj(A)
Where adj(A) represents the adjugate of matrix A, obtained by swapping the elements of the main diagonal and changing the sign of the off-diagonal elements. Applying the formula, we have:
[tex]A^(-1)[/tex] = (1/(-1)) * [5 -7; -3 4]
= [-5 7; 3 -4]
Therefore, the inverse of the given matrix [4 7; 3 5] is [5 -7; -3 4].
LEARN MORE ABOUT matrix here: brainly.com/question/28180105
#SPJ11
The number of patients in a clinic in the past 7 months are: 593, 464, 618, 765, 553, 731, 647 What is the value of MAPE (in percent) if we use a four-month moving average method? Use at least 4 decimal places.
The Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) for a four-month moving average method applied to the given patient data is 13.7196%.
To calculate the MAPE using a four-month moving average method, we need to find the average of the absolute percentage errors for each month's forecasted value compared to the actual value.
First, we calculate the four-month moving average for each month using the provided data:
Moving Average for Month 1 = (593 + 464 + 618 + 765) / 4 = 610
Moving Average for Month 2 = (464 + 618 + 765 + 553) / 4 = 600
Moving Average for Month 3 = (618 + 765 + 553 + 731) / 4 = 666.75
Moving Average for Month 4 = (765 + 553 + 731 + 647) / 4 = 674
Moving Average for Month 5 = (553 + 731 + 647) / 3 = 643.67
Moving Average for Month 6 = (731 + 647) / 2 = 689
Moving Average for Month 7 = 647
Next, we calculate the absolute percentage error for each month's forecasted value compared to the actual value:
APE for Month 1 = |(610 - 593) / 593| = 0.0287
APE for Month 2 = |(600 - 464) / 464| = 0.2927
APE for Month 3 = |(666.75 - 618) / 618| = 0.0789
APE for Month 4 = |(674 - 765) / 765| = 0.1183
APE for Month 5 = |(643.67 - 553) / 553| = 0.1630
APE for Month 6 = |(689 - 731) / 731| = 0.0575
APE for Month 7 = |(647 - 647) / 647| = 0
Finally, we find the average of the absolute percentage errors and multiply it by 100 to obtain the MAPE:
MAPE = (0.0287 + 0.2927 + 0.0789 + 0.1183 + 0.1630 + 0.0575 + 0) / 7 * 100 ≈ 13.7196%
Therefore, the value of MAPE (in percent) for the four-month moving average method applied to the given patient data is approximately 13.7196%.
Learn more about average here:
https://brainly.com/question/12035368
#SPJ11
Consider a perfectly competitive firm that produces output from labor and capital under the following conditions: - Y=100K
1/2
+40L
1/2
- P=$2 - W=$8 - R=$10 a. Suppose that the firm has decided to employ 25 units of labor and is currently employing pu
0
units of capital. What will its profit be at those employment levels? b. What equation describes the profit-maximizing quantity of capital for this firm? c. To raise profits, should the firm increase its capital employment (from 50 to something higher), or decrease it? Explain.
The profit of a perfectly competitive firm is calculated using the production function. The firm should adjust capital employment based on marginal returns and costs to maximize profits.
To calculate the profit, substitute the given values of labor, capital, and input prices into the production function and subtract the total cost from total revenue.
The profit-maximizing quantity of capital can be determined by taking the derivative of the profit function with respect to capital and setting it equal to zero.
This will provide the optimal capital level that maximizes profits. Comparing the profit at the current capital level to the profit at other potential capital levels can indicate whether increasing or decreasing capital employment will result in higher profits.
This decision should be based on evaluating the marginal returns of capital, considering factors such as diminishing returns and the cost of additional capital units.
Learn more about Profit here:
https://brainly.com/question/32461520
#SPJ11
The table shows the number of at bats and hits for some of the members of the Florida Marlins in a recent season.
(b) Predict the number of hits a player with 300 at bats would get. Identify and explain your reasoning.
Bailey's season batting average is approximately 0.317, while Janson's season batting average is approximately 0.314.
To determine each player's batting average for the entire season, we can use the formula for batting average, which is calculated by dividing the number of hits by the number of at-bats. Let's calculate the batting averages for Bailey and Janson based on the data provided in the table.
For Bailey:
In the first half of the season, Bailey had 17 hits and 56 at-bats, resulting in a batting average of 17/56 ≈ 0.304.
In the second half of the season, Bailey had 85 hits and 265 at-bats, giving a batting average of 85/265 ≈ 0.321.
To find Bailey's season batting average, we can add up the total hits and total at-bats from both halves of the season:
Total hits = 17 + 85 = 102
Total at-bats = 56 + 265 = 321
Bailey's season batting average = Total hits / Total at-bats
= 102 / 321 ≈ 0.317.
For Janson:
In the first half of the season, Janson had 107 hits and 345 at-bats, resulting in a batting average of 107/345 ≈ 0.310.
In the second half of the season, Janson had 50 hits and 155 at-bats, giving a batting average of 50/155 ≈ 0.323.
To find Janson's season batting average, we can add up the total hits and total at-bats from both halves of the season:
Total hits = 107 + 50 = 157
Total at-bats = 345 + 155 = 500
Janson's season batting average = Total hits / Total at-bats
= 157 / 500 ≈ 0.314.
In summary, Bailey's season batting average is approximately 0.317, while Janson's season batting average is approximately 0.314.
Learn more about calculating batting averages here:
https://brainly.com/question/24057012
#SPJ4
Questions:The table shows the number of hits and at bats for two baseball players during the first and second halves of the season.
First half of season| Second half of season
Player & Hits & At bats & Batting average| Hits & At bats & Batting average
Bailey &17 & 56 & 0.304| 85& 265 &0.321
Janson & 107 & 345 & 0.310|50& 155 &0.323
Click to download the data in your preferred format. Crunch It! CSV Excel JMP Mac Text Minitab PC Text R SPSS TI Calc Batting average is determined by dividing the number of hits by the number of at-bats. Use the number of hits and at bats from the proceeding table to determine each player's batting average for the entire season. Enter the values in the following table. Give your answers precise to three decimal places. Player| Season batting average
Bailey |
Janson|
Use a calculator to find the sine and cosine of each value of θ . Then calculate the ratio sinθ/cosθ. Round answers to the nearest thousandth, if necessary.
30 degrees
For a 30-degree angle, the sine (sin) is approximately 0.5, the cosine (cos) is approximately 0.866, and the ratio sinθ/cosθ is approximately 0.577. These values represent the trigonometric functions of the given angle.
The sine (sin) and cosine (cos) functions represent the ratio of the lengths of the sides of a right triangle. For a 30-degree angle in a right triangle, the sides are in the ratio 1:√3:2. Using this information, we can find the sine and cosine values.
sin(30 degrees) ≈ 0.5
cos(30 degrees) ≈ 0.866
Now, we can calculate the ratio sinθ/cosθ:
sinθ/cosθ = (0.5)/(0.866)
Dividing these values, we get:
sinθ/cosθ ≈ 0.577
Rounded to the nearest thousandth, the ratio sinθ/cosθ for a 30-degree angle is approximately 0.577.
Learn more about angle here:
brainly.com/question/30147425
#SPJ11
On an analog clock, the minute hand has moved 128° from the hour. What number will it pass next?
b. How can you find the number of degrees between every two consecutive numbers?
There are 30° between every two consecutive numbers on an analog clock.
Given that on an analog clock, the minute hand moved 128° in an hour we need to find the numbers it has pass next,
On an analog clock, the minute hand completes a full revolution of 360° in 60 minutes.
This means that each minute corresponds to a movement of 360°/60 = 6°.
The minute hand has moved 128° from the hour, we can determine the number of minutes it has traveled by dividing 128° by 6°:
128° / 6° = 21.33 minutes
Since the minute hand has moved beyond 21 minutes, it will pass the next number on the clock.
If we consider the current number to be n, then it will pass the number (n+1) next.
To find the number of degrees between every two consecutive numbers on an analog clock, we divide the total degrees in a circle (360°) by the number of divisions on the clock face (12 numbers):
360° / 12 = 30°
Therefore, there are 30° between every two consecutive numbers on an analog clock.
Learn more about consecutive numbers click;
https://brainly.com/question/29775116
#SPJ4
Let Y be a random variable. In a population, μ
Y
=90 and σ
Y
2
=52. Use the central limit theorem to answer the following questions. (Note: any intermediate results should be rounded to four decimal places) In a random sample of size n=50, find Pr(
Y
ˉ
<91). Pr(
Y
ˉ
<91)=0.8365 (Round your response to four decimal places) In a random sample of size n=166, find Pr(91<
Y
ˉ
<94). Pr(91<
Y
ˉ
<94)= (Round your response to four decimal places)
For n = 50, the standard deviation of the sampling distribution is σY/√n = 7.21. So, Pr(ˉY<91) = 0.8365, and for n = 166, the standard deviation of the sampling distribution is σY/√n = 2.82. So, Pr(91<ˉY<94) = 0.5987.
The central limit theorem states that the sampling distribution of the sample mean, ˉY, will be normally distributed with mean μY and standard deviation σY/√n, where n is the sample size.
The theorem states that, as the sample size increases, the sampling distribution of the sample mean will approach a normal distribution, regardless of the shape of the population distribution.
This means that we can use the normal distribution to calculate probabilities about the sample mean, even when we don't know the shape of the population distribution.
In this problem, we were able to use the central limit theorem to calculate the probability that the sample mean would be less than 91 and the probability that the sample mean would be between 91 and 94. These probabilities were calculated using the standard normal distribution, which is a table of probabilities for the normal distribution.
In this problem, we are given that μY = 90 and σY2 = 52. We are asked to find Pr(ˉY<91) and Pr(91<ˉY<94) for two different sample sizes, n = 50 and n = 166.
For n = 50, the standard deviation of the sampling distribution is σY/√n = 7.21. So, Pr(ˉY<91) = 0.8365.
For n = 166, the standard deviation of the sampling distribution is σY/√n = 2.82. So, Pr(91<ˉY<94) = 0.5987.
In conclusion, the central limit theorem allows us to use the normal distribution to approximate the sampling distribution of the sample mean, even when the population distribution is not normally distributed.
Learn more about central limit theorem here:
brainly.com/question/898534
#SPJ11
calculate the volume of a rectangular box with the dimensions 42.6 cm by 4.41 cm by 1.932 cm. then calculate the number of kilograms of mercury (density
The volume of the rectangular box is 360.0956928 cm³.The number of kilograms of mercury in the given rectangular box is approximately 0.0049 kg.
To calculate the volume of a rectangular box, we multiply its length, width, and height together. Given the dimensions:
Length = 42.6 cm
Width = 4.41 cm
Height = 1.932 cm
Volume = Length * Width * Height
Volume = 42.6 cm * 4.41 cm * 1.932 cm
Volume = 360.0956928 cm³
Therefore, the volume of the rectangular box is 360.0956928 cm³.
To calculate the number of kilograms of mercury, we need to know the density of mercury. The density of mercury is approximately 13.6 g/cm³.
To convert the volume from cubic centimeters to cubic meters, we divide by 1,000,000 (since 1 cubic meter is equal to 1,000,000 cubic centimeters):
Volume (in cubic meters) = Volume (in cubic centimeters) / 1,000,000
Volume (in cubic meters) = 360.0956928 cm³ / 1,000,000
Volume (in cubic meters) = 0.0003600956928 m³
To calculate the mass of mercury, we multiply the volume by the density:
Mass = Volume (in cubic meters) * Density
Mass = 0.0003600956928 m³ * 13.6 g/cm³
Note that we need to convert grams to kilograms by dividing by 1000:
Mass = (0.0003600956928 m³ * 13.6 g/cm³) / 1000
Mass = 0.0048972970272 kg
Therefore, the number of kilograms of mercury in the given rectangular box is approximately 0.0049 kg.
To learn more about volume click here:
brainly.com/question/27770332
#SPJ11
What is the rule for how many significant figures you are able to get using a measuring instrument?.
The rule for how many significant figures you are able to get using a measuring instrument is that the number of significant figures is equal to the number of digits that are certain plus one digit that is estimated.
For example, if you measure a length with a ruler that has marks every millimeter, then you can report the length to two significant figures, such as 3.5 cm. The 3 is certain because it is a whole number that is marked on the ruler. The 5 is estimated because it is the value between the 4 and 6 marks on the ruler.
* The number of significant figures in a measurement is determined by the least precise digit.
* The least precise digit is the digit that is estimated.
* The other digits in the measurement are certain.
* For example, in the measurement 3.5 cm, the least precise digit is the 5. This digit is estimated because it is the value between the 4 and 6 marks on the ruler. The 3 is certain because it is a whole number that is marked on the ruler.
* Therefore, the measurement has two significant figures.
It is important to report the correct number of significant figures in a measurement. This is because it is a way of communicating the uncertainty of the measurement. If you report too many significant figures, you are giving the impression that your measurement is more precise than it actually is. If you report too few significant figures, you are not giving enough information about the uncertainty of your measurement.
to learn more about number click here:
brainly.com/question/29546604
#SPJ11
The measure θ of an angle in standard position is given. Find the exact values of cosθ and sinθ for each angle measure.
π/ 6 radians
For θ = π/6 radians, cosθ = √3/2 and sinθ = 1/2 is obtained by using trigonometric functions.
The measure θ of an angle in standard position is π/6 radians. To find the exact values of cosθ and sinθ for this angle measure, we can use the unit circle.
Step 1: Draw the unit circle, which is a circle with a radius of 1 centered at the origin (0, 0) on the coordinate plane.
Step 2: Locate the angle θ = π/6 radians on the unit circle. This angle is formed by the positive x-axis and a line segment from the origin to a point on the unit circle.
Step 3: To find the exact value of cosθ, look at the x-coordinate of the point where the angle intersects the unit circle. In this case, the x-coordinate is √3/2. Therefore, cos(π/6) = √3/2.
Step 4: To find the exact value of sinθ, look at the y-coordinate of the point where the angle intersects the unit circle. In this case, the y-coordinate is 1/2. Therefore, sin(π/6) = 1/2.
So, for θ = π/6 radians, cosθ = √3/2 and sinθ = 1/2.
To know more about refer trigonometric functions here:
https://brainly.com/question/25618616
#SPJ11
What is the complete solution set of 3/x²-1 + 4x/x+1= 1.5/x-1?
f. 1,-1
g. 1,0.375
h. 0.375
i. 0.375,3
The complete solution set of 3/(x²-1) + 4x/(x+1) = 1.5/(x-1) is x = 1, 0.375.
To determine the complete solution set of 3/(x²-1) + 4x/(x+1) = 1.5/(x-1)
Convert in quadratic equation
3/(x²-1) + 4x/(x+1) = 1.5/(x-1) = 0
3/(x²-1) + 4x/(x+1) - 1.5/(x-1) = 0
[3 + (x -1)(4x) - 1.5(x- 1)]/(x + 1)(x - 1) = 0
4x²- 5.5x + 1.5 = 0
Determine roots,
4x(x² - 1) - 1.5(x - 1) = 0
x = 1, 0.375
Therefore, the complete solution set of 3/(x²-1) + 4x/(x+1) = 1.5/(x-1) is x = 1, 0.375.
Learn more about quadratic equation here:
https://brainly.com/question/30347453
#SPJ4
the length of a rectangle is 3m less than double the width, and the area of the rectangle is 14 m^2 . find the dimensions of the rectangle.
The dimensions of the rectangle are width = 7/2 meters and length = 4 meters.
Let's assume that the width of the rectangle is x meters. According to the given information, the length of the rectangle is 3 meters less than double the width, which can be expressed as 2x - 3.
The area of a rectangle is given by the formula: Area = Length × Width. In this case, the area is given as 14 m². Therefore, we can write the equation:
(x)(2x - 3) = 14
Expanding the equation:
2x² - 3x = 14
Rearranging the equation to standard form:
2x² - 3x - 14 = 0
To solve this quadratic equation, we can factor it or use the quadratic formula. In this case, let's use the quadratic formula:
x = (-b ± √(b² - 4ac)) / (2a)
In our equation, a = 2, b = -3, and c = -14. Plugging in these values into the quadratic formula:
x = (-(-3) ± √((-3)² - 4(2)(-14))) / (2(2))
x = (3 ± √(9 + 112)) / 4
x = (3 ± √121) / 4
x = (3 ± 11) / 4
Simplifying further:
x = (3 + 11) / 4 or x = (3 - 11) / 4
x = 14 / 4 or x = -8 / 4
x = 7/2 or x = -2
Since the width cannot be negative, we discard the negative solution. Therefore, the width of the rectangle is 7/2 meters.
Now, we can substitute the value of x into the expression for the length:
Length = 2x - 3
Length = 2(7/2) - 3
Length = 7 - 3
Length = 4 meters
Thus, the dimensions of the rectangle are width = 7/2 meters and length = 4 meters.
for more such question on rectangle visit
https://brainly.com/question/25292087
#SPJ8
Jessica had $17 and Kathy had $13 more than Jessica had. How much did Kathy have?
Answer:
$30
Step-by-step explanation:
17+13
4.33
The number of internal disk drives (in millions) made at a plant in Taiwan during the past 5 years follows:
YEAR
DISK DRIVES
1
140
2
160
3
190
4
200
5
210
a)Forecast the number of disk drives to be made next year, using linear regression.
b)Compute the mean squared error (MSE) when using linear regression.
c)Compute the mean absolute percent error (MAPE).
Could some please help? I would like to make sure my caculations are correct.
Thank you
(a) Forecast: Linear regression the next year is approx 191.6007.
(b) MSE: Mean Squared Error is approximately 249.1585.
(c) MAPE: Mean Absolute Percent Error is approximately 10.42%.
(a) (a) Forecast using linear regression:
To forecast the number of disk drives for the next year, we can use linear regression to fit a line to the given data points. The linear regression equation is of the form y = mx + b, where y represents the number of disk drives and x represents the year.
Calculating the slope (m):
m = (Σ(xy) - n(Σx)(Σy)) / (Σ(x^2) - n(Σx)^2)
Σ(xy) = (1)(140) + (2)(160) + (3)(190) + (4)(200) + (5)(210) = 2820
Σ(x) = 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 = 15
Σ(y) = 140 + 160 + 190 + 200 + 210 = 900
Σ(x^2) = (1^2) + (2^2) + (3^2) + (4^2) + (5^2) = 55
m = (2820 - 5(15)(900)) / (55 - 5(15)^2)
m = (2820 - 6750) / (55 - 1125)
m = -3930 / -1070
m ≈ 3.6729
Calculating the y-intercept (b):
b = (Σy - m(Σx)) / n
b = (900 - 3.6729(15)) / 5
b = (900 - 55.0935) / 5
b ≈ 168.1813
Using the equation y = 3.6729x + 168.1813, where x represents the year, we can predict the number of disk drives for the next year. To do so, we substitute the value of x as the next year in the equation. Let's assume the next year is represented by x = 6:
y = 3.6729(6) + 168.1813
y ≈ 191.6007
Therefore, according to the linear regression model, the predicted number of disk drives for the next year is approximately 191.6007.
(b) Calculation of Mean Squared Error (MSE):
To calculate the Mean Squared Error (MSE), we need to compare the predicted values obtained from linear regression with the actual values given in the data.
First, we calculate the predicted values using the linear regression equation: y = 3.6729x + 168.1813, where x represents the year.
Predicted values:
Year 1: y = 3.6729(1) + 168.1813 = 171.8542
Year 2: y = 3.6729(2) + 168.1813 = 175.5271
Year 3: y = 3.6729(3) + 168.1813 = 179.2000
Year 4: y = 3.6729(4) + 168.1813 = 182.8729
Year 5: y = 3.6729(5) + 168.1813 = 186.5458
Next, we calculate the squared difference between the predicted and actual values, and then take the average:
MSE = (Σ(y - ŷ)^2) / n
MSE = ((140 - 171.8542)^2 + (160 - 175.5271)^2 + (190 - 179.2000)^2 + (200 - 182.8729)^2 + (210 - 186.5458)^2) / 5
MSE ≈ 249.1585
The Mean Squared Error (MSE) for the linear regression model is approximately 249.1585.
This value represents the average squared difference between the predicted values and the actual values, providing a measure of the accuracy of the model.
(c) Calculation of Mean Absolute Percent Error (MAPE):
To calculate the Mean Absolute Percent Error (MAPE), we need to compare the predicted values obtained from linear regression with the actual values given in the data.
First, we calculate the predicted values using the linear regression equation: y = 3.6729x + 168.1813, where x represents the year.
Predicted values:
Year 1: y = 3.6729(1) + 168.1813 ≈ 171.8542
Year 2: y = 3.6729(2) + 168.1813 ≈ 175.5271
Year 3: y = 3.6729(3) + 168.1813 ≈ 179.2000
Year 4: y = 3.6729(4) + 168.1813 ≈ 182.8729
Year 5: y = 3.6729(5) + 168.1813 ≈ 186.5458
Next, we calculate the absolute percent error for each year, which is the absolute difference between the predicted and actual values divided by the actual value, multiplied by 100:
Absolute Percent Error (APE):
Year 1: |(140 - 171.8542) / 140| * 100 ≈ 18.467
Year 2: |(160 - 175.5271) / 160| * 100 ≈ 9.704
Year 3: |(190 - 179.2000) / 190| * 100 ≈ 5.684
Year 4: |(200 - 182.8729) / 200| * 100 ≈ 8.563
Year 5: |(210 - 186.5458) / 210| * 100 ≈ 11.682
Finally, we calculate the average of the absolute percent errors:
MAPE = (APE₁ + APE₂ + APE₃ + APE₄ + APE₅) / n
MAPE ≈ (18.467 + 9.704 + 5.684 + 8.563 + 11.682) / 5 ≈ 10.42
The Mean Absolute Percent Error (MAPE) for the linear regression model is approximately 10.42%.
This value represents the average percentage difference between the predicted values and the actual values, providing a measure of the relative accuracy of the model.
Learn more about Equation click here :brainly.com/question/13763238
#SPJ11
Simplify each expression using the imaginary unit i . √-24.
The expression √-24 can be simplified using the imaginary unit i as 2i√6.
To simplify √-24, we can break it down into two parts: the square root of -1 (which is represented by the imaginary unit i) and the square root of 24.
The square root of -1 is i, and the square root of 24 can be simplified as 2√6.
Combining these two parts, we get 2i√6 as the simplified form of √-24.
The imaginary unit i is defined as the square root of -1. It is used to represent imaginary numbers, which are numbers that involve the square root of a negative number. In this case, the expression involves the square root of -24, which is a negative number. By using the imaginary unit i, we can simplify √-24 as 2i√6, where 2 is the coefficient and √6 is the remaining radical term.
LEARN MORE ABOUT imaginary unit here: brainly.com/question/29274771
#SPJ11
Construct an outline, concept map, diagram, etc. whatever you want, for the research methodology, it should include the following points
1-My methodology
2-Experimental design
3-Approach: quantitative
4-Population: 989
5-Sample size: 402
6-Type of sampling: conglomerates
7-Research techniques: Surveys
8-Data collection: Surveys
9-Data analysis: R software
I have a doubt, because in point 7 and 8 they are different points but they have the same concepts, that is: surveys.
Explain to me why both have the same thing if they are different steps or is neccesary change something there in 7 and 8?
If you want you can add more concepts or branches in your graph.
Answer (25-30 words): In point 7 and 8, the concept of surveys is repeated because research techniques refer to the overall approach, while data collection specifically focuses on the method used to gather data.
In research methodology, point 7 refers to the research techniques employed, which in this case is surveys. Surveys are a common method for gathering data in quantitative research. Point 8, on the other hand, specifies the data collection process, which again involves the use of surveys. While it may seem repetitive to mention surveys twice, it is important to differentiate between the broader research technique (point 7) and the specific method used to collect data (point 8).
The research technique, surveys, encompasses the overall approach of using questionnaires or interviews to collect data from respondents. It represents the methodology chosen to gather information. On the other hand, data collection focuses on the actual process of administering the surveys and collecting responses from the target population.
By including both points, the outline or concept map reflects the distinction between the research technique (surveys) and the specific step of data collection using surveys. This ensures clarity and precision in describing the methodology.
Learn more about technique here: brainly.com/question/29843697
#SPJ11
a culture of yeast grows at a rate proportional to its size. if the initial population is 1000 cells and it doubles after 3 hours, answer the followin
From the question that we have;
1) P(t) = Po[tex]e^{rt}[/tex]
2) After seven hours we have 5003
3) The rate is 0.23
What is exponential growth?
Exponential growth is a type of growth in which a quantity or population grows over time at an ever-increasing rate.
We have that;
P(t) = Po[tex]e^{rt}[/tex]
P(t) = Population at time t
Po = Initial population
r = rate of growth
t = time taken
Thus;
2(1000) = 1000[tex]e^{3r}[/tex]
2 = [tex]e^{3r}[/tex]
r = ln2/3
r = 0.23
After seven hours;
P(t) =1000[tex]e^{7(0.23)}[/tex]
= 5003
The rate of growth at seven hours;
5003 = 1000[tex]e^{7r}[/tex]
5003/1000 = [tex]e^{7r}[/tex]
r = 0.23
Learn more about exponential growth:https://brainly.com/question/1596693
#SPJ4
A _________________ represents only one hypothesis about how evolution occurred.
Answer:
"The Theory of Evolution"
pa brainly boi
What is the standard deviation of 5, 9, 9, 1, 5, 7, 6 then round it to the nearest tenth
The standard deviation of 5, 9, 9, 1, 5, 7, 6 rounded to the nearest tenth is 2.6.
Standard deviation calculationStep 1: Calculate the mean
Mean = (5 + 9 + 9 + 1 + 5 + 7 + 6) / 7 = 42 / 7 = 6
Step 2: Subtract the mean and square the differences
[tex](5 - 6)^2[/tex] = 1
[tex](9 - 6)^2[/tex] = 9
[tex](9 - 6)^2[/tex] = 9
[tex](1 - 6)^2[/tex] = 25
[tex](5 - 6)^2[/tex] = 1
[tex](7 - 6)^2[/tex] = 1
[tex](6 - 6)^2[/tex] = 0
Step 3: Calculate the mean of the squared differences
Mean = (1 + 9 + 9 + 25 + 1 + 1 + 0) / 7 = 46 / 7 = 6.5714
Step 4: Take the square root of the mean
Standard Deviation = sqrt(6.5714) ≈ 2.5651
Rounded to the nearest tenth, the standard deviation is approximately 2.6.
More on standard deviation can be found here: https://brainly.com/question/12402189
#SPJ4
You and a friend are tossing a ball back and forth. You each toss and catch the ball at waist level, 3 feet high. What equation, in standard form, models the path of the ball? Explain your reasoning.
The equation y = -x² + 9 accurately represents the path of the ball as it moves back and forth between you and your friend, with the ball's height at each horizontal position governed by the parabolic trajectory of the equation.
The equation that models the path of the ball in standard form is y = -x² + 9. This equation represents a downward-opening parabola that accurately represents the trajectory of the ball as it moves back and forth between you and your friend at a height of 3 feet.
The reasoning behind this equation is as follows:
Since the ball is being tossed back and forth at waist level, the height of the ball can be represented by the y-coordinate. The x-coordinate represents the horizontal distance from the person throwing the ball. We can assume that the ball is initially thrown from a position of x = 0.
To model the trajectory, we consider that the ball starts at a height of 3 feet and then follows a parabolic path. The negative coefficient in front of the x² term indicates that the parabola opens downward.
The constant term, 9, represents the maximum height of the ball. Since the ball is being tossed at waist level (3 feet), the maximum height reached by the ball is 3 + 6 = 9 feet. The additional 6 feet accounts for the vertical displacement of the ball from its starting height of 3 feet.
Therefore, the equation y = -x² + 9 accurately represents the path of the ball as it moves back and forth between you and your friend, with the ball's height at each horizontal position governed by the parabolic trajectory of the equation.
Learn more about parabolic trajectory here:
brainly.com/question/24235651
#SPJ11
Which information could he have used to determine this? angleglh is-congruent-to angleilm mangleklm = 5mangleilm manglegli = 2mangleglh manglegli = mangleglh manglehli
Angle HLI is equal to 180 - 2x degrees.
The given information states that angle GLH is congruent to angle ILM. Let's denote angle ILM as x.
Therefore, angle GLH is also x. We are also given that angle KLM is 5 times angle ILM, so angle KLM is 5x. Additionally, it is stated that angle GLI is twice angle GLH, which means angle GLI is 2x.
To find angle HLI, we need to subtract angle GLI from 180 degrees since the sum of angles in a triangle is 180 degrees. Therefore, angle HLI is equal to 180 - 2x.
To learn more about angle click here
brainly.com/question/30147425
#SPJ11
What are the real or imaginary solutions of each polynomial equation?
a. x⁴ = 16 .
The real solutions of the polynomial equation x⁴ = 16 are x = ±2.To find the real or imaginary solutions of the polynomial equation x⁴ = 16, we can start by rewriting it as x⁴ - 16 = 0.
We can then factor the equation as a difference of squares: (x²)² - 4² = 0. Now, we have a quadratic equation in the form a² - b² = 0, which can be factored using the difference of squares formula: (x² - 4)(x² + 4) = 0. From this equation, we get two possible cases: Case 1: x² - 4 = 0. Solving for x, we have: x² = 4; x = ±2. Case 2: x² + 4 = 0.
This equation has no real solutions because the square of a real number is always positive. Therefore, the real solutions of the polynomial equation x⁴ = 16 are x = ±2.
To learn more about polynomial equation click here: brainly.com/question/28947270
#SPJ11
Is the inequality always, sometimes, or never true?
6 x-13<6(x-2)
The inequality 6x - 13 < 6 (x - 2) is always true. 0 < 1 is always true so, the inequality is always true for any value of x.
When we simplify the inequality, we have 6x - 13 < 6x - 12.
6x - 13 < 6x - 12
or, 6x - 6x < 13 - 12
or, 0 < 1
Notice that the x-terms cancel out, resulting in 0 < 1.
In the comparison 0 < 1, the left side 0 is indeed less than the right side 1, making the inequality true. This holds true for all values of x.
Since the inequality is true regardless of the value of x, we can conclude that the original inequality 6x - 13 < 6 (x - 2) is always true.
To know more about inequality,
https://brainly.com/question/2500298
#SPJ4
A store has 4 employees that earn 134 dollars altogether. if they all earn the same amount, how much does each employee earn?
Each employee earns $33.50. Since there are 4 employees and they earn a total of $134, dividing the total by the number of employees gives us $33.50 per employee.
To determine how much each employee earns in a store where there are 4 employees in total, and they all earn the same amount, we can divide the total amount earned by the number of employees.
Given that the total amount earned by the 4 employees is $134, we need to divide this amount equally among them to find the individual earnings.
Let's calculate the amount earned by each employee:
Amount earned by each employee = Total amount earned / Number of employees
Amount earned by each employee = $134 / 4
Dividing $134 by 4, we find that each employee earns $33.50.
Therefore, each employee in the store earns $33.50.
Learn more about employee here
https://brainly.com/question/29484847
#SPJ11
