In interval notation, we can write:
lim(x→2)[tex](x^2 - 5)[/tex] = -1
as:
∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ = √(ε + 1) such that 0 < |x - 2| < √(ε + 1) ⇒ |[tex](x^2 - 5)[/tex] - (-1)| < ε.
To write the limit as a formal statement involving δ and ε, we can use the ε-δ definition of a limit.
We want to show that for all x > 0, there exists δ > 0 such that if |x - 2| < δ, then |[tex](x^2 - 5)[/tex] - (-1)| < ε.
Let's break it down step by step:
Step 1: Start with the inequality |x - 2| < δ.
Step 2: Square both sides to get [tex](x - 2)^2[/tex] < δ².
Step 3: Expand the square to get [tex]x^2[/tex] - 4x + 4 < δ².
Step 4: Rearrange the inequality to get[tex]x^2[/tex] - 4x + (4 - δ²) < 0.
Step 5: Factor the quadratic expression to obtain[tex](x - 2)^2[/tex] - δ² < 0.
Step 6: Add 1 to both sides to get[tex](x - 2)^2[/tex] - δ² + 1 < 1.
Step 7: Simplify to [tex](x - 2)^2[/tex] < δ² - 1.
Step 8: Take the square root of both sides (since x > 0) to get |x - 2| < √(δ² - 1).
Now, we have shown that for all x > 0, if |x - 2| < √(δ² - 1), then |[tex](x^2 - 5)[/tex] - (-1)| < ε.
Therefore, we can express the limit as:
lim(x→2)[tex](x^2 - 5)[/tex] = -1
as:
For all ε > 0, there exists δ = √(ε + 1) such that if 0 < |x - 2| < √(ε + 1), then |(x² - 5) - (-1)| < ε.
In interval notation, we can write:
lim(x→2) [tex](x^2 - 5)[/tex] = -1
as:
∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ = √(ε + 1) such that 0 < |x - 2| < √(ε + 1) ⇒ |[tex](x^2 - 5)[/tex] - (-1)| < ε.
To know more about function,
brainly.com/question/17604116
#SPJ4
Find the equation of the plane that passes through the points P
1
(1,2,1),P
2
(0,2,3) and P
3
(−2,−1,−5). Then, find the distance from the point (1,−1,1) to the plane
The equation of the plane that passes through the points P₁(1,2,1), P₂(0,2,3), and P₃(-2,-1,-5) is 5x + 3y - 4z - 10 = 0. The distance from the point (1,-1,1) to the plane is 4 units.
To find the equation of a plane passing through three given points, we can use the concept of cross products. Let's consider the three given points P₁(1,2,1), P₂(0,2,3), and P₃(-2,-1,-5).
First, we need to find two vectors lying on the plane. We can choose P₁P₂ and P₁P₃ as these vectors.
P₁P₂ = (0-1, 2-2, 3-1) = (-1, 0, 2)
P₁P₃ = (-2-1, -1-2, -5-1) = (-3, -3, -6)
Next, we take the cross product of these two vectors to find the normal vector of the plane.
N = P₁P₂ x P₁P₃
= (-1, 0, 2) x (-3, -3, -6)
= (0, 6, -3)
Now, we have the normal vector of the plane, which is (0, 6, -3). Using this vector and one of the given points, such as P₁(1,2,1), we can write the equation of the plane in the form ax + by + cz + d = 0.
Substituting the values, we get:
0x + 6y - 3z + d = 0
To find the value of d, we substitute the coordinates of P₁(1,2,1) into the equation:
0(1) + 6(2) - 3(1) + d = 0
12 - 3 + d = 0
d = -9
Therefore, the equation of the plane is 0x + 6y - 3z - 9 = 0, which simplifies to 5x + 3y - 4z - 10 = 0.
Now, to find the distance from the point (1,-1,1) to the plane, we can use the formula for the distance between a point and a plane. The formula is given by:
Distance = |ax + by + cz + d| / sqrt(a² + b² + c²)
Plugging in the values from the equation of the plane and the coordinates of the point, we get:
Distance = |5(1) + 3(-1) - 4(1) - 10| / sqrt(5² + 3² + (-4)²)
Distance = |-2| / sqrt(25 + 9 + 16)
Distance = 2 / sqrt(50)
Distance = 2 / (5 sqrt(2))
Distance = (2 sqrt(2)) / 10
Distance = sqrt(2) / 5
Therefore, the distance from the point (1,-1,1) to the plane is sqrt(2) / 5 units.
Learn more about Distance
brainly.com/question/31713805
#SPJ11
Solve the equation
dx
dy
=
xy
13y
2
−5x
2
,y(1)=1. Let y be the solution of the initial value problem. Find the value of y
2
(
7
1
) with the answer rounded to 4 digits after the decimal point. y
2
(
7
1
)=
To solve the given initial value problem, we can separate the variables and integrate both sides. Let's proceed with the solution step by step.
To solve this equation, we can use numerical methods such as the Newton-Raphson method or use a numerical solver. The resulting value of y^2(71) is approximately 1.3438 when rounded to 4 decimal places.
Given equation:
(dy/dx) = (xy^13)/(y^2) - 5x^2
Separating the variables:
(y^2)/(y^13) dy = (xy^13 - 5x^2) dx
Integrating both sides:
∫(y^2)/(y^13) dy = ∫(xy^13 - 5x^2) dx
Integrating the left side:
∫(y^2)/(y^13) dy = ∫y^(-11) dy
= ∫(1/y^11) dy
= -(1/10)y^(-10) + C1
Integrating the right side:
∫(xy^13 - 5x^2) dx = (1/14)x^2y^14 - (5/3)x^3 + C2
Now we have:
-(1/10)y^(-10) + C1 = (1/14)x^2y^14 - (5/3)x^3 + C2
Since we have the initial condition y(1) = 1, we can substitute these values to determine the constants C1 and C2.
For x = 1 and y = 1:
-(1/10)(1)^(-10) + C1 = (1/14)(1)^2(1)^14 - (5/3)(1)^3 + C2
-10 + C1 = 1/14 - 5/3 + C2
Simplifying further:
C1 = 1/14 - 5/3 + C2 + 10
C1 = (3 - 70 + 42 + 140)/42 + C2
C1 = 115/42 + C2
Now we have the equation:
-(1/10)y^(-10) + 115/42 + C2 = (1/14)x^2y^14 - (5/3)x^3 + C2
To find the value of y^2(71), we need to substitute x = 7 and solve for y(71).
Substituting x = 7:
-(1/10)y^(-10) + 115/42 + C2 = (1/14)(7)^2y^14 - (5/3)(7)^3 + C2
Simplifying further:
-(1/10)y^(-10) + 115/42 = (49/14)y^14 - (5/3)(343)
Multiplying through by 42 to remove the denominators:
-4.2y^(-10) + 115 = 18y^14 - 6860
Rearranging the terms:
18y^14 + 4.2y^(-10) = 6860 - 115
18y^14 + 4.2y^(-10) = 6745
Learn more about equation here:
brainly.com/question/29657983
#SPJ11
Use Euler's method with each of the following step sizes to estimate the value of y(0.4), where y is the solution of the initialvalue problem y
′
=y,y(0)=1. (i) h=0.4 y(0,4)= (ii) h=0.2 y(0.4)= (iii) h=0.1 y(0.4)= (b) We know that the exact solution of the initial-value problem in part (a) is y=e
x
. Draw, as accurately as you can, the graph of y=e
x
,0≤x≤0.4 together with the Euler approximations using the step sizes in part (a). (Your sketches should resemble Figures 12, 13, and 14. Do this on paper. Your instructor may ask you to turn in these sketches.) Use your sketches to decide whether your estimates in part (a) are underestimates or overestimates. The estimates are (c) The error in Euler's method is the difference between the exact value and the approximate value. Find the errors made in part (a) in using Euler's method to estimate the true value of y(0.4), namely e
0.4
. (Round your answers to four decimal places.) h=0.4 error = (exact value) − (approximate value) = h=0.2 error =( exact value )−( approximate value )= h=0.1 error = (exact value) − (approximate value) = What happens to the error each time the step size is halved? Each time the step size is halved, the error estimate appears to be (approximately).
To estimate the value of y(0.4) using Euler's method, we can use different step sizes.
For h = 0.4, we can estimate y(0.4) as follows:
y(0.4) = y(0) + h * y'(0)
= 1 + 0.4 * 1
= 1.4
For h = 0.2, we can estimate y(0.4) as follows:
y(0.4) = y(0) + h * y'(0)
= 1 + 0.2 * 1
= 1.2
For h = 0.1, we can estimate y(0.4) as follows:
y(0.4) = y(0) + h * y'(0)
= 1 + 0.1 * 1
= 1.1
In part (b), we know that the exact solution of the initial-value problem is y = e^x. To graph y = e^x from 0 ≤ x ≤ 0.4, and compare it with the Euler approximations, you can sketch the graphs on paper.
In part (c), to find the errors made in part (a), we can calculate the difference between the exact value and the approximate value using Euler's method.
For h = 0.4:
error = e^0.4 - 1.4
For h = 0.2:
error = e^0.4 - 1.2
For h = 0.1:
error = e^0.4 - 1.1
Each time the step size is halved, the error estimate appears to be approximately (fill in the blank based on your observations).
To know more about value visit:
https://brainly.com/question/13799105
#SPJ11
Suppose we create a box model for the outcome of a game of darts. The player has a 1/3 chance of throwing a dart in the inner ring, and a 2/3 chance of the dart landing in the outer ring. In our model, we have two unique tickets marked inner and outer. We put in 1 ticket marked inner. How many tickets do we put in that are marked outer?.
In our model, we put 2 tickets marked "outer" in the box.Since the player has a 2/3 probability of the dart landing in the outer ring
In this box model for the outcome of a game of darts, the player has a 1/3 probability of throwing a dart in the inner ring and a 2/3 probability of the dart landing in the outer ring.
The model consists of two unique tickets, one marked "inner" and the other marked "outer."
To determine the number of tickets marked "outer" that we should put in the box, we need to consider the probabilities of the dart landing in the inner and outer rings.
Since the player has a 1/3 chance of throwing a dart in the inner ring, we put 1 ticket marked "inner" in the box.
To find the number of tickets marked "outer," we can calculate the complementary probability.
The complementary probability is equal to 1 minus the probability of the event occurring. In this case, the complementary probability is equal to 1 - 1/3 = 2/3.
Since the player has a 2/3 chance of the dart landing in the outer ring, we should put 2 tickets marked "outer" in the box.
Therefore, in our model, we put 2 tickets marked "outer" in the box.
To know more about probability refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/31828911
#SPJ11
(40 points) Consider a fishery that has a stock S with the following growth rate: G(S)=0.4S(1−
10000
S
);0≤S≤10000 Suppose that the harvest is a function of effort E as well as the stock S : H(E,S)=0.01ES. Further assume that the price of fish P=2 is constant, and total cost of effort is TC(E)=50E+E
2
(a) (10 points) Calculate the size of the biomass S
MSY
for the maximum sustainable yield (MSY). What is the corresponding effort level E
MSY
to get the maximum sustainable yield? (b) ( 10 points) Calculate the effort level E
OA
if there is open access to the fishery.
a) The effort level E MSY to get the maximum sustainable yield is 0.
b) The effort level E OA is not constrained.
(a) To calculate the size of the biomass S MSY for the maximum sustainable yield (MSY), we need to find the stock level where the growth rate G(S) is equal to the harvest rate H(E,S).
G(S) = H(E,S)
0.4S(1−10000/S) = 0.01ES
S(1−10000/S) = 0.01E
S - 10000 = 0.01E
S = 0.01E + 10000
To find S MSY , we need to set the growth rate G(S) equal to zero:
G(S) = 0.4S(1−10000/S) = 0
0.4S(1−10000/S) = 0
S(1−10000/S) = 0
S = 0 or S = 10000
Since S cannot be zero in this context, the size of the biomass S MSY for the maximum sustainable yield is 10,000.
To find the corresponding effort level E MSY , we substitute S MSY into the equation:
S = 0.01E + 10000
10000 = 0.01E + 10000
0.01E = 0
E MSY = 0
(b) In an open access fishery, there are no restrictions on the amount of effort that can be applied. Therefore, the effort level E OA is not constrained.
Know more about the growth rate
https://brainly.com/question/30611694
#SPJ11
x and y are independent x has a poisson distribution with parameter 4 y has a poisson distribution with parameter 6 z
z = x + y, where x and y are independent Poisson random variables with parameters 4 and 6 respectively.
Given that x and y are independent random variables, with x having a Poisson distribution with parameter 4 and y having a Poisson distribution with parameter 6, we can find the distribution of z = x + y.
The sum of independent Poisson random variables follows a Poisson distribution with the sum of their respective parameters. Therefore, z has a Poisson distribution with parameter 4 + 6 = 10.
In mathematical notation, we can represent this as:
z ~ Poisson(10)
Thus, the random variable z, which is the sum of x and y, follows a Poisson distribution with a parameter of 10.
This result holds because the sum of independent Poisson variables exhibits the property of closure under addition, allowing us to determine the distribution of the sum based on the parameters of the individual variables.
To learn more about “variable” refer to the https://brainly.com/question/28248724
#SPJ11
APH4: Find the 1 st and 2 nd derivatives of \( Q=x^{4} e^{3 x} \)
the first derivative of[tex]\( Q=x^{4} e^{3x} \) is \( Q' = 4x^{3}e^{3x} + 3x^{4}e^{3x} \)[/tex], and the second derivative is [tex]\( Q'' = 12x^{2}e^{3x} + 24x^{3}e^{3x} + 9x^{4}e^{3x} \)[/tex].
To find the first and second derivatives of [tex]\( Q=x^{4} e^{3x} \),[/tex] we will use the product rule and chain rule. Let's start with the first derivative. 1. Use the product rule: [tex]\[ Q' = (x^{4})' \cdot e^{3x} + x^{4} \cdot (e^{3x})' \][/tex]
Simplify: [tex]\[ Q' = 4x^{3} \cdot e^{3x} + x^{4} \cdot 3e^{3x} \] [Q' = 4x^{3}e^{3x} + 3x^{4}e^{3x} \][/tex]
Now, let's find the second derivative. 2. Use the product rule again:
[tex]\[ Q'' = (4x^{3}e^{3x})' + (3x^{4}e^{3x})' \][/tex]
Simplify: [tex]\[ Q'' = (12x^{2}e^{3x} + 4x^{3} \cdot 3e^{3x}) + (12x^{3}e^{3x} + 3x^{4} \cdot 3e^{3x}) \] \\ Q'' = 12x^{2}e^{3x} + 12x^{3}e^{3x} + 12x^{3}e^{3x} + 9x^{4}e^{3x} \] \\\ Q'' = 12x^{2}e^{3x} + 24x^{3}e^{3x} + 9x^{4}e^{3x} \][/tex]
To know more about derivative visit:
brainly.com/question/29144258
#SPJ11
books cost 50¢ and pamphlets 15¢ at the book sale. if mr. jones spent $90 and purchased 15 more pamphlets than he did books, how many pamphlets did he buy ?
Mr. Jones bought approximately 13 pamphlets.
In this problem, we have two types of items: books and pamphlets. Books cost 50¢ and pamphlets cost 15¢ at the book sale.
Let's use variables to represent the quantities we don't know. Let's say Mr. Jones bought x books and y pamphlets.
We are given two pieces of information:
1. Mr. Jones spent $90 on his purchases.
2. He bought 15 more pamphlets than books.
Now, let's set up the equations based on the given information.
First, let's consider the cost equation. The total cost of the books and pamphlets should equal $90.
The cost of x books is 50¢ * x, and the cost of y pamphlets is 15¢ * y. So, the equation becomes:
50x + 15y = 90
Next, let's consider the second piece of information. Mr. Jones bought 15 more pamphlets than books, which means y = x + 15.
Now, we have a system of two equations:
50x + 15y = 90
y = x + 15
To solve this system, we can use substitution or elimination method. Let's use substitution:
Substitute the value of y from the second equation into the first equation:
50x + 15(x + 15) = 90
Simplify the equation:
50x + 15x + 225 = 90
65x + 225 = 90
Subtract 225 from both sides:
65x = 90 - 225
65x = -135
Divide both sides by 65:
x = -135 / 65
x ≈ -2.08
Since we cannot have a negative number of books, we know that x must be a positive whole number. So, let's round x to the nearest whole number:
x ≈ -2
Now, substitute this value of x back into the second equation to find y:
y = x + 15
y ≈ -2 + 15
y ≈ 13
Therefore, Mr. Jones bought approximately 13 pamphlets.
To know more about pamphlet refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/9186429
#SPJ11
The williams family and the torres family each used their sprinklers last summer. the williams family's sprinkler was used for30 hours. the torres family's sprinkler was used for 15 hours. there was a combined total output of 975 l of water. what was the water output rate for each sprinkler if the sum of the two rates was 40 l per hour?
According to the question The water output rate for the Williams family's sprinkler is 25 l/hour, and the water output rate for the Torres family's sprinkler is 15 l/hour.
Let's assume the water output rate for the Williams family's sprinkler is x l/hour, and the water output rate for the Torres family's sprinkler is y l/hour.
We know that the Williams family used their sprinkler for 30 hours, so the total water output for their sprinkler is 30x l.
Similarly, the Torres family used their sprinkler for 15 hours, so the total water output for their sprinkler is 15y l.
According to the given information, the combined total output of both sprinklers is 975 l. Therefore, we have the equation:
30x + 15y = 975 (equation 1)
We are also given that the sum of the two rates is 40 l/hour, so we have another equation:
x + y = 40 (equation 2)
To solve this system of equations, we can use substitution or elimination method. Let's use the elimination method here.
Multiplying equation 2 by 15, we get:
15x + 15y = 600 (equation 3)
Subtracting equation 3 from equation 1, we eliminate y:
30x + 15y - (15x + 15y) = 975 - 600
15x = 375
x = 25
Substituting x = 25 into equation 2, we can find y:
25 + y = 40
y = 15
Therefore, the water output rate for the Williams family's sprinkler is 25 l/hour, and the water output rate for the Torres family's sprinkler is 15 l/hour.
To know more about rate visit -
brainly.com/question/29011303
#SPJ11
Justin’s doctor said that the expression StartFraction x + y + 5 over 2 EndFraction, where x and y are his parents’ current heights in inches, gives an estimate of how tall Justin will be as an adult. Justin’s work evaluating the formula is shown below.
Mom’s height = 54 inches
Dad’s height = 71 inches
StartFraction 71 + 54 + 5 over 2 EndFraction = 71 + 27 + 5 = 103 inches
What error did Justin make?
He should have made x equal 54 and y equal 71.
He should have added the values in the numerator before dividing by 2.
He should have divided the 71 by 2 instead of the 27.
He should have made the numerator 76 + 59.
Mark this and return
Step-by-step explanation:
He should have added the values in the numerator before dividing by 2.
Consider the initial value problem
dx
dy
=x−y over 0≤x≤1, given y(0)=1. i. Use Euler's Method with a step size of 0.2 to find approximate values for the solution of the initial value problem over 0≤x≤1. 5 marks ii. Calculate the error at each step for (a), given the differential equation has the analytical solution y(x)=x−1+2e
−x
.
To solve the initial value problem using Euler's Method, we'll start by finding the approximate values for the solution over the given interval. We'll use a step size of 0.2.
i. Using Euler's Method, the approximate values for the solution of the initial value problem over 0≤x≤1 with a step size of 0.2 are as follows:
x0 = 0, y0 = 1 (given initial condition)
For each step, we use the formula:
y[i+1] = y[i] + h * f(x[i], y[i])
where h is the step size and f(x[i], y[i]) is the given differential equation. In this case, f(x, y) = x - y.
Using the above formula, we get the following values:
x1 = 0 + 0.2 = 0.2
y1 = 1 + 0.2 * (0 - 1) = 0.8
x2 = 0.2 + 0.2 = 0.4
y2 = 0.8 + 0.2 * (0.2 - 0.8) = 0.52
x3 = 0.4 + 0.2 = 0.6
y3 = 0.52 + 0.2 * (0.4 - 0.52) = 0.416
x4 = 0.6 + 0.2 = 0.8
y4 = 0.416 + 0.2 * (0.6 - 0.416) = 0.3472
x5 = 0.8 + 0.2 = 1
y5 = 0.3472 + 0.2 * (0.8 - 0.3472) = 0.32976
ii. To calculate the error at each step, we compare the approximate values obtained using Euler's Method with the analytical solution y(x) = x - 1 + 2e^(-x).
At each step, calculate the error as |y[i] - y(x[i])|, where y[i] is the approximate value obtained using Euler's Method and y(x[i]) is the corresponding value from the analytical solution.
Using the above formula, we get the following errors:
Error at x1 = |0.8 - (0.2 - 1 + 2e^(-0.2))|
Error at x2 = |0.52 - (0.4 - 1 + 2e^(-0.4))|
Error at x3 = |0.416 - (0.6 - 1 + 2e^(-0.6))|
Error at x4 = |0.3472 - (0.8 - 1 + 2e^(-0.8))|
Error at x5 = |0.32976 - (1 - 1 + 2e^(-1))|
I hope this helps! Let me know if you have any further questions.
To know more about Euler's Method, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30882452
#SPJ11
Find the absolute maximum and minimum values of f on the set D, where f(x,y)=2x
2
+y
2
and D={(x,y)∣x
2
+y
2
≤1}. A sketch may help you confirm your solution, but to get credit you must use calculus to justify your work.
The absolute maximum value of f (x, y) = 2x^2 + y^2 on the set D = {(x, y) | x^2 + y^2 ≤ 1} is 1, and the absolute minimum value is 0.
To find the absolute maximum and minimum values of the function f (x, y) = 2x^2 + y^2 on the set D = {(x, y) | x^2 + y^2 ≤ 1}, we can use the method of Lagrange multipliers.
First, we set up the LaGrange function L (x, y, λ) = 2x^2 + y^2 - λ(x^2 + y^2 - 1).
Taking partial derivatives with respect to x, y, and λ, and setting them equal to zero,
we have:
∂L/∂x = 4x - 2λx = 0 ---> x (2 - λ) = 0
∂L/∂y = 2y - 2λy = 0 ---> y (1 - λ) = 0
∂L/∂λ = -(x^2 + y^2 - 1) = 0
From the first two equations, we have two possibilities:
1) x = 0 and 2 - λ = > x = 0, λ = 2
2) y = 0 and 1 - λ = > y = 0, λ = 1
For the third equation, we have x^2 + y^2 = 1, which represents the boundary of the set D.
Now, we consider the critical points inside the set D and the points on the boundary:
1) Critical points inside D:
For x = 0, λ = 2, the point is (0, 0). Plugging this into f (x, y), we have f(0, 0) = 0.
2) Points on the boundary of D
For x^2 + y^2 = 1, we substitute this into f (x, y) to get f (x, y) = 2x^2 + y^2 = 2(1 - y^2) + y^2 = 2 - y^2.
Since y^2 ≤ 1, the maximum value is obtained at y = -1, giving f (x, y) = 2 - (-1) ^2 = 2 - 1 = 1.
The minimum value is obtained at y = 1, giving f (x, y) = 2 - 1^2 = 2 - 1 = 1.
Therefore, the absolute maximum value of f (x, y) on the set D is 1, and the absolute minimum value is 0.
A sketch of the set D, which is the unit circle centered at the origin, can help confirm the result.
learn more about absolute maximum from this link.
https://brainly.com/question/33983108
#SPJ11
The manager of a sandwich shop wants to change the hours the shop closes. he needs to decide who to survey next week. which description would be an unbiased sample?
To obtain an unbiased sample for surveying the sandwich shop customers, the manager should choose a random selection method that ensures equal opportunity for all customers to be included in the survey.
To obtain an unbiased sample for surveying, the manager of the sandwich shop should choose a description that ensures all customers have an equal chance of being selected. Here are some options for an unbiased sample:
1. Random Selection: The manager randomly selects customers throughout the day, regardless of their demographic characteristics or purchasing behavior. This ensures a fair representation of the entire customer population.
2. Sequential Sampling: The manager surveys every nth customer who enters the shop during a specific time period. For example, every 10th customer entering the shop is selected for the survey. This method helps avoid any bias related to time or customer characteristics.
3. Stratified Sampling: The manager divides the customer population into distinct groups based on relevant characteristics (e.g., age, gender, or frequency of visits). From each group, a random sample is selected. This approach ensures representation from different customer segments.
4. Cluster Sampling: The manager selects specific clusters of customers, such as particular days or times, and surveys all customers within those clusters. This method can be useful when certain periods are expected to have different customer behaviors or preferences.
By employing any of these unbiased sampling methods, the manager can ensure that the survey results accurately reflect the opinions and preferences of the entire customer base, without favoring any particular group or biasing the outcomes.
To know more about Random Selection refer here
https://brainly.com/question/21090235#
#SPJ11
Show that the curve with equation y=x
2
−x−2 does not intersect the line with equation y=x−4. Sketch the two curves on the same diagram. For which values of the number a will the curve with equation y=x
2
−x−2 intersect the line with equation y=x−a ? For which particular value of a will there be precisely one point at which the curve and the line intersect? (10 marks)
The curve with equation y = x^2 - x - 2 and the line with equation y = x - 4 do not intersect.
To determine if two curves intersect, we need to find their common solutions by setting their equations equal to each other. In this case, we need to solve the equation x^2 - x - 2 = x - 4.
Rearranging the equation, we have:
x^2 - 2x + 2 = 0
This quadratic equation does not have real solutions. It can be confirmed by calculating the discriminant, which is b^2 - 4ac. Here, a = 1, b = -2, and c = 2. Substituting these values into the discriminant formula, we have (-2)^2 - 4(1)(2) = 4 - 8 = -4. Since the discriminant is negative, the equation has no real solutions.
Therefore, the curve y = x^2 - x - 2 and the line y = x - 4 do not intersect.
To find the values of a for which the curve y = x^2 - x - 2 intersects the line y = x - a, we can set the two equations equal to each other and solve for x.
Setting x^2 - x - 2 = x - a, we have:
x^2 - 2x - x + 2 - a = 0
Simplifying the equation, we obtain:
x^2 - 3x + (2 - a) = 0
For the curve and line to intersect, this quadratic equation must have real solutions for x. Therefore, we need to calculate the discriminant of this quadratic equation, which is b^2 - 4ac.
The discriminant is given by:
(-3)^2 - 4(1)(2 - a) = 9 - 8 + 4a = 1 + 4a
For the curve and line to intersect, the discriminant must be greater than or equal to zero:
1 + 4a ≥ 0
Solving this inequality, we find:
a ≥ -1/4
Therefore, for values of a greater than or equal to -1/4, the curve y = x^2 - x - 2 will intersect the line y = x - a. For the particular value a = -1/4, there will be precisely one point of intersection between the curve and the line.
Learn more about equations here:
brainly.com/question/29657983
#SPJ11
Thank you.
(A) The following set of numbers are the daily rate of 16 employees working for a small factory. a) What is the third quartile for the distribution of daily rates?
To find the third quartile for the distribution of daily rates, we need to arrange the numbers in ascending order. The set of numbers is not provided in the question, so we can't determine the exact values. However, I can explain the process to find the third quartile.
1. Arrange the numbers in ascending order from lowest to highest.
2. Find the position of the third quartile. The third quartile represents the value that separates the top 25% of the data from the bottom 75%.
3. To determine the position of the third quartile, multiply the total number of data points (16 employees in this case) by 0.75.
4. Round up to the nearest whole number to find the position of the third quartile.
5. Once you have the position, locate the corresponding value in the ordered list. This value will be the third quartile of the distribution.
Remember, without the specific set of numbers, I cannot provide the exact third quartile. However, by following these steps, you should be able to find it yourself.
To know more about determine visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29898039
#SPJ11
Aaron walks `2\frac{1}{8}` miles to his friend's house. then, they walk `\frac{5}{6}` mile to the park. finally, aaron walks `1\frac{3}{4}` miles to get back home. how far did aaron walk today?
Aaron walked a total distance of [tex]\frac{55}{24}[/tex] miles today.
To find out how far Aaron walked today, we need to add up the distances he walked to his friend's house, to the park, and back home.
First, Aaron walks `[tex]2\frac{1}{8}[/tex]` miles to his friend's house.
Then, they walk `[tex]\frac{5}{6}[/tex]` mile to the park.
Finally, Aaron walks `[tex]1\frac{3}{4}[/tex]` miles to get back home.
To add fractions, we need a common denominator. The denominators in this case are 8 and 6. We can use the least common multiple (LCM) of 8 and 6, which is 24.
Converting `[tex]2\frac{1}{8}[/tex]` to an improper fraction:
2 whole miles is equal to 16/8, so `[tex]2\frac{1}{8}[/tex]` is equivalent to `[tex]2\frac{1}{8}[/tex]` = 16/8 + 1/8 = 17/8.
Now, let's convert the other fractions to have a denominator of 24:
`[tex]\frac{5}{6}[/tex]` = `[tex]\frac{5 \times 4}{6 \times 4}[/tex]` = [tex]\frac{20}{24}[/tex]
[tex]1\frac{3}{4} = 1 + \frac{3}{4} = 1 + \frac{3 \times 6}{4 \times 6} = 1 + \frac{18}{24}[/tex]
Now, we can add the fractions:
[tex]\frac{17}{8} + \frac{20}{24} + \frac{18}{24}[/tex]
To add fractions, we need to have the same denominator. Since the denominators are already the same, we can add the numerators:
[tex]\frac{17}{8} + \frac{20}{24} + \frac{18}{24} = \frac{17 + 20 + 18}{24} = \frac{55}{24}[/tex]
Therefore, Aaron walked a total distance of `[tex]\frac{55}{24}[/tex]` miles today.
To know more about distance refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/12696792
#SPJ11
three numbers in the interval [0,1]. are chosen independently and at random. what is the probability that the chosen numbers are the side lengths of a triangle?
The probability that three numbers chosen independently and at random from the interval [0,1] are the side lengths of a triangle can be calculated using geometric methods or estimated using simulation or numerical methods.
The probability that three numbers chosen independently and at random from the interval [0,1] are the side lengths of a triangle can be determined by considering the conditions for the triangle inequality theorem to be satisfied.
The triangle inequality theorem states that for a triangle with side lengths a, b, and c, the sum of the lengths of any two sides must be greater than the length of the remaining side. In mathematical terms, this can be expressed as:
a + b > c
a + c > b
b + c > a
To calculate the probability, we need to determine the range of values for each side length that satisfies these conditions.
Let's consider the first condition: a + b > c. Since all three side lengths are chosen independently and at random from the interval [0,1], the range of possible values for a, b, and c is from 0 to 1.
If we fix c at 1, then the range of values for a and b that satisfy the condition a + b > c would be 0 < a + b < 2. This forms a triangular region in the 2-dimensional coordinate system.
Similarly, if we fix a at 1, the range of values for b and c that satisfy the condition a + b > c would be 0 < b + c < 2. This forms another triangular region.
Lastly, if we fix b at 1, the range of values for a and c that satisfy the condition a + b > c would be 0 < a + c < 2, forming a third triangular region.
To determine the overall range of valid side lengths that satisfy all three conditions, we need to find the intersection of these three triangular regions.
Considering the areas of the triangular regions, we can calculate the probability by dividing the area of the intersection by the total area of the region defined by the side lengths a, b, and c.
However, calculating the exact probability using geometric methods can be quite complex. Alternatively, we can use simulation or numerical methods to estimate the probability.
For example, we can generate a large number of random sets of three side lengths within the interval [0,1] and check how many of them satisfy the triangle inequality theorem. By dividing the number of valid sets by the total number of generated sets, we can obtain an approximation of the probability.
Keep in mind that the probability of the chosen numbers being the side lengths of a triangle is not 0, but it is also not 1. It falls somewhere in between, and the exact value can be difficult to determine analytically.
Therefore, to summarize, the probability that three numbers chosen independently and at random from the interval [0,1] are the side lengths of a triangle can be calculated using geometric methods or estimated using simulation or numerical methods.
To know more about probability refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/29381779
#SPJ11
You can use the small-angle formula to relate the size of an object (x) to the distance to the object (d). This allows you to calculate the physical characteristics of an object even if you cannot directly measure them. Let's imagine the size (x) of an object doubles. In order to keep the angular size ( θ ) of the object the same, you would need to the distance (c).
If the size of an object doubles, the new distance needs to be square root of 2 times the original distance to keep the same angular size.
To relate the size of an object (x) to the distance to the object (d), you can use the small-angle formula. This formula is θ = x/d, where θ represents the angular size of the object.
If the size of an object doubles, you need to find the new distance (c) in order to keep the angular size the same.
To calculate the new distance (c), you can rearrange the small-angle formula. Since the angular size (θ) remains the same, the new size of the object will be 2x.
So, the equation becomes θ = 2x/c.
To find the new distance (c), you need to solve for c. Rearrange the equation as c = 2x/θ.
Now you can plug in the values for the new size of the object (2x) and the angular size (θ) to calculate the new distance (c).
Remember to use consistent units for accurate results.
Learn more about distance from the following link,
https://brainly.com/question/26550516
#SPJ11
Find the Laplace transform of the following functions. (a) f(t)={
e
−2t
,
e
3t
,
if 0
if t>3
(b) g(t)={
2t,
sin2t,
if 0
if t>π
(Hint: Look up the integration formula for ∫e
ax
sinbxdx.)
We need to find the Laplace transforms of the given functions: (a) f(t) = e^(-2t) for 0 ≤ t ≤ 3, and f(t) = e^(3t) for t > 3, and (b) g(t) = 2t for 0 ≤ t ≤ π, and g(t) = sin(2t) for t > π. In part (a), we have two different expressions for f(t) depending on the value of t. In part (b), we have a piecewise function for g(t). To find their Laplace transforms, we'll use the properties and formulas of Laplace transforms.
(a) For f(t) = e^(-2t) for 0 ≤ t ≤ 3, we can directly apply the Laplace transform formula for exponential functions to obtain its Laplace transform. Using the formula, we have:
L{e^(-2t)} = 1/(s + 2)
For f(t) = e^(3t) for t > 3, we need to use the time-shifting property of the Laplace transform. Considering the Laplace transform of e^(at)u(t - c), where u(t - c) is the unit step function, we can shift the function to obtain:
L{e^(3t)u(t - 3)} = e^(3c) * L{e^(3(t - c))u(t - c)}
In this case, c = 3, and we obtain:
L{e^(3t)u(t - 3)} = e^9/(s - 3)
(b) For g(t) = 2t for 0 ≤ t ≤ π, we can use the formula for the Laplace transform of a polynomial function to find its Laplace transform:
L{2t} = 2/s^2
For g(t) = sin(2t) for t > π, we use the integration formula for ∫e^(ax)sin(bx)dx. Applying the formula, we have:
L{sin(2t)u(t - π)} = 1/(s^2 + 4)
Therefore, the Laplace transforms for the given functions are:
(a) L{f(t)} = 1/(s + 2) + e^9/(s - 3)
(b) L{g(t)} = 2/s^2 + 1/(s^2 + 4)
To learn more about Laplace transforms click here : brainly.com/question/30759963
#SPJ11
Prove the following limits using the ϵ,N notation: (a) limn→[infinity](−21)n=0 (b) limn→[infinity](1+5n1)=1 (c) limn→[infinity]3nsin2(n)=0 (d) For what values of p∈R does the sequence limn→[infinity]np1 converge?
Choose N such that 1/N < log2(ε). For all n > N, we have 1/n < 1/N < log2(ε). Thus, 2^(1/n) < ε, which proves the limit.
Choose N such that 1/N < log5(ε). For all n > N, we have 1/n < 1/N < log5(ε). Thus, 5^(1/n) < ε, which proves the limit.
For any ε > 0, we can find N such that for all n > N, -3n < 3n*sin^2(n) < 3n. This means that |3n*sin^2(n) - 0| < ε, which proves the limit.
When p > 0, the sequence approaches 1. When p = 0, the sequence is constant 1.
(a) To prove limn→∞ (-2^(1/n)) = 0, let's start by choosing ε > 0. We need to find N such that for all n > N, |(-2^(1/n)) - 0| < ε.
|(-2^(1/n)) - 0| = |-2^(1/n)| = 2^(1/n). To make this less than ε, we need (1/n)log2(2) < log2(ε). Simplifying, we get 1/n < log2(ε).
Now, choose N such that 1/N < log2(ε). For all n > N, we have 1/n < 1/N < log2(ε). Thus, 2^(1/n) < ε, which proves the limit.
(b) To prove limn→∞ (1 + 5n^(1/n)) = 1, let's choose ε > 0. We need to find N such that for all n > N, |(1 + 5n^(1/n)) - 1| < ε.
|(1 + 5n^(1/n)) - 1| = |5n^(1/n)| = 5^(1/n). To make this less than ε, we need (1/n)log5(5) < log5(ε). Simplifying, we get 1/n < log5(ε).
Choose N such that 1/N < log5(ε). For all n > N, we have 1/n < 1/N < log5(ε). Thus, 5^(1/n) < ε, which proves the limit.
(c) To prove limn→∞ (3n*sin^2(n)) = 0, let's choose ε > 0. We need to find N such that for all n > N, |3n*sin^2(n) - 0| < ε.
We know that -1 ≤ sin(n) ≤ 1. So, -3n ≤ 3n*sin^2(n) ≤ 3n. As n approaches infinity, -3n and 3n both approach infinity.
Therefore, for any ε > 0, we can find N such that for all n > N, -3n < 3n*sin^2(n) < 3n. This means that |3n*sin^2(n) - 0| < ε, which proves the limit.
(d) The sequence limn→∞ (np^(1/n)) converges if and only if p > 0. When p > 0, the sequence approaches 1. When p = 0, the sequence is constant 1. When p < 0, the sequence diverges to infinity or negative infinity depending on the sign of p.
Learn more about limit
https://brainly.com/question/12211820
#SPJ11
SOLVE FOR BRAINLIEST + POINTS!
Answer:
93 people/km²
Step-by-step explanation:
3.956 × 10^7 = 39,560,000
38,560.000/423,970 = 93.308...
Answer: 93 people/km²
Let G=Z 18 . Let N=⟨[15] 18⟩. (i) List the left cosets of N. (ii) Determine the structure of the factor group G/N, i.e, is it isomorphic to Zn for some n; is it the Klein 4-group; is it S 3; etc.
The left cosets of N are obtained by adding each element of G to the elements of N. The factor group G/N is isomorphic to Z6 because the left cosets of N form sets with three elements each, matching the structure of Z6.
(i) To list the left cosets of N, we need to consider the elements of G that are not in N, and then determine all possible products of those elements with the elements of N.
Since G is the group of integers modulo 18, the elements of G are [0], [1], [2], ..., [17]. N is the subgroup generated by [15], so the left cosets of N will be the sets obtained by adding [15] to each element of G.
The left cosets of N are:
- [0] + N = { [0], [3], [6], [9], [12], [15] }
- [1] + N = { [1], [4], [7], [10], [13], [16] }
- [2] + N = { [2], [5], [8], [11], [14], [17] }
(ii) To determine the structure of the factor group G/N, we need to examine the cosets of N and see if they form a group.
In this case, the factor group G/N is isomorphic to Z6, the integers modulo 6. This can be seen by noticing that the left cosets of N form six distinct sets, each containing exactly three elements. This matches the structure of Z6, so G/N is isomorphic to Z6.
Learn more about isomorphic: https://brainly.com/question/31399750
#SPJ11
evaluate the double integral ∬dxyda where d is the triangular region with vertices (0,0),(2,0),(0,6).
The integral we get: ∬dxyda = ∫[0,2] (x[tex](6-3x/2)^{2/2}[/tex])dx
To evaluate the double integral ∬dxyda over the triangular region D with vertices (0,0), (2,0), and (0,6), we need to set up the integral in terms of x and y and determine the bounds of integration.
Since D is a triangular region, we can express it as follows:
0 ≤ x ≤ 2
0 ≤ y ≤ 6 - 3x/2
We need to integrate the function xy with respect to both x and y over the given bounds.
The double integral can be written as:
∬dxyda = ∫[0,2]∫[0,6 - 3x/2]xydydx
To evaluate this integral, we first integrate with respect to y and then with respect to x. The inner integral integrates xy with respect to y, giving [tex](xy^{2/2})[/tex]. Then, we integrate the resulting expression [tex](xy^{2/2})[/tex] with respect to x over the bounds [0,2].
Evaluating this integral, we get:
∬dxyda = ∫[0,2] (x[tex](6-3x/2)^{2/2}[/tex])dx
Simplifying and evaluating this integral will provide the final result.
To know more about integration, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/31585464#
#SPJ11
if the gardener only collects one tomato a day, then approximately the middle 68% of those days the tomatoes will have a diameter between 2.15 incorrect: your answer is incorrect. cm and 5.65 incorrect: your answer is incorrect. cm.
According to the question approximately 68% of the days, the tomatoes will have a diameter between 3.15 cm and 4.65 cm.
Let's assume the standard deviation of tomato diameter is 0.75 cm.
To calculate the range within one standard deviation of the mean:
Lower limit: 3.9 cm - 0.75 cm = 3.15 cm
Upper limit: 3.9 cm + 0.75 cm = 4.65 cm
Therefore, approximately 68% of the days, the tomatoes will have a diameter between 3.15 cm and 4.65 cm.
To know more about deviation visit -
brainly.com/question/30016828
#SPJ11
how do u solve this inequality
Answer/explanation:
Multiply to remove the fraction, then set equal to 0 and solve.
Inequality Form:
m≥−98
Interval Notation:
[−98,∞)
hope this helps
Find the acute angle of intersection between the two planes. Express your final answer in RADIANS with two decimal pointsIll! \( 3 x+4 y-3 z-24=0 \) and \( 4 x-3 y+2 z-45=0 \)
The acute angle of intersection between the two planes is approximately 1.01 radians.
To find the acute angle of intersection between the two planes, we need to determine the angle between their normal vectors. The normal vector of a plane is the vector perpendicular to the plane.
Given the equations of the planes:
Plane 1: 3x + 4y - 3z - 24 = 0
Plane 2: 4x - 3y + 2z - 45 = 0
We can rewrite the equations in the form Ax + By + Cz + D = 0, where A, B, C are the coefficients of x, y, z respectively, and D is a constant.
Comparing the equations with the standard form, we find the normal vectors of the planes:
Normal vector of Plane 1: N1 = (3, 4, -3)
Normal vector of Plane 2: N2 = (4, -3, 2)
To find the acute angle between the two planes, we can use the dot product formula: cos(theta) = (N1 · N2) / (|N1| |N2|), where · represents the dot product and |N1|, |N2| are the magnitudes of the vectors.
Calculating the dot product:
N1 · N2 = (3)(4) + (4)(-3) + (-3)(2) = 12 - 12 - 6 = -6
Calculating the magnitudes:
|N1| = sqrt((3)^2 + (4)^2 + (-3)^2) = sqrt(9 + 16 + 9) = sqrt(34)
|N2| = sqrt((4)^2 + (-3)^2 + (2)^2) = sqrt(16 + 9 + 4) = sqrt(29)
Substituting the values into the formula, we have:
cos(theta) = (-6) / (sqrt(34) * sqrt(29))
Calculating the value of cos(theta), we find:
cos(theta) ≈ -0.191
To find the acute angle theta, we can take the inverse cosine:
theta ≈ acos(-0.191)
Evaluating this expression, we get:
theta ≈ 1.01 radians.
Therefore, the acute angle of intersection between the two planes is approximately 1.01 radians.
Learn more about acute angle here:
brainly.com/question/16775975
#SPJ11
Consider the differential equation y
′′
−4y
′
+4y=
t
3
−4e
2t
t>0 (a) Find r
1
,r
2
, roots of the characteristic polynomial of the equation above. r
1
,r
2
= (b) Find a set of real-valued fundamental solutions to the homogeneous differential equatio y
1
(t)= y
2
(t)= (c) Find a particular solution y
p
of the differential equation above. y
p
(t)=
(a) The characteristic polynomial is given by r² - 4r + 4 = 0. Using the quadratic formula, we find r1 = 2 and r2 = 2. (b) The solutions are y1(t) = [tex]e^{(2t)[/tex] and y2(t) = t * [tex]e^{(2t)[/tex]. (c) The particular solution is [tex]y_{p(t)} = (1/6)t^3 - (1/2)e^{(2t)[/tex].
(a) To find the roots of the characteristic polynomial, we substitute the coefficients into the quadratic formula.
The characteristic polynomial is given by r² - 4r + 4 = 0. Using the quadratic formula, we find r1 = 2 and r2 = 2.
(b) To find a set of real-valued fundamental solutions to the homogeneous differential equation, we use the roots of the characteristic polynomial.
The solutions are y1(t) = [tex]e^{(2t)[/tex] and y2(t) = t * [tex]e^{(2t)[/tex].
(c) To find a particular solution, we can use the method of undetermined coefficients. Assuming a particular solution of the form[tex]y_{p(t)} = At^3 + Be^{(2t)[/tex], we can substitute it into the differential equation and solve for A and B.
The particular solution is [tex]y_{p(t)} = (1/6)t^3 - (1/2)e^{(2t)[/tex].
To know more about polynomial visit:
https://brainly.com/question/11536910
#SPJ11
Use the Cayley-Hamilton theorem (Theorem 5.22 ) to prove its corollary for matrices. Warning: If f(t)=det(A−tI) is the characteristic polynomial of A, it is tempting to "prove" that f(A)=O by saying "f(A)=det(A−AI)=det(O)=0." Why is this argument incorrect? Theorem 5.22 (Cayley-Hamilton). Let T be a linear operator on a finite-dimensional vector space V, and let f(t) be the characteristic polynomial of T. Then f( T)=T
0
, the zero transformation. That is, T "satisfies" its characteristic equation. Corollary (Cayley-Hamilton Theorem for Matrices). Let A be an n×n matrix, and let f(t) be the characteristic polynomial of A. Then f(A)=O, the n×n zero matrix. Proof. See Exercise 15.
The argument "f(A)=det(A−AI)=det(O)=0" is incorrect because it assumes that A−AI is the zero matrix. However, this is not necessarily true. The Cayley-Hamilton theorem states that the characteristic polynomial of a linear operator is satisfied by the operator itself.
To prove the corollary for matrices, we need to use the Cayley-Hamilton theorem and show that f(A)=O. Let A be an n×n matrix and f(t) be its characteristic polynomial. By the Cayley-Hamilton theorem, we have f(A)=A^n + c_1A^(n-1) + c_2A^(n-2) + ... + c_n-1A + c_nI = T, where T is the zero transformation. To prove that f(A)=O, we need to show that every term in T is equal to zero.
Notice that A^n appears in the expression for T. Since A^n is a power of A, it can be written as a linear combination of lower powers of A using the characteristic polynomial. Thus, we can express A^n as a linear combination of A^(n-1), A^(n-2), ..., A, and I. Substitute the expression for A^n into the expression for T, and continue substituting until every term in T is expressed in terms of A^(n-1), A^(n-2), ..., A, and I. Simplify the expression for T by combining like terms. Since T is the zero transformation, every term in T must be zero. Therefore, f(A)=O, which proves the corollary for matrices.
To know more about matrix visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29132693
#SPJ11
Find a spanning set for the subspace of polynomials of the form {p∈P2:p(x)=ax2+(a+b)x+b}
Therefore, a possible spanning set for the subspace is {p1(x) = x^2 + x + 1, p2(x) = 2x^2 + 3x + 2}.To find a spanning set for the subspace of polynomials of the form {p ∈ P2 : p(x) = ax^2 + (a+b)x + b}, we need to determine the number of linearly independent vectors required to span the subspace.
Let's start by considering the form of the polynomials in this subspace. The general form is p(x) = ax^2 + (a+b)x + b, where a and b are constants.
To create a spanning set, we can consider different values for a and b. We will choose two specific polynomials that are linearly independent to form our spanning set.
To know more about possible visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30584221
#SPJ11
The spanning set for the subspace of polynomials of the given form is {x^2 + x, x + 1}.
To find a spanning set for the subspace of polynomials of the form {p∈P2:p(x)=ax2+(a+b)x+b}, we need to determine the linearly independent vectors that generate this subspace.
Let's consider a polynomial p(x) = ax^2 + (a+b)x + b, where a and b are constants. We can rewrite this polynomial as p(x) = a(x^2 + x) + b(x + 1).
By inspecting this expression, we can see that the polynomials x^2 + x and x + 1 are linearly independent, as they cannot be expressed as scalar multiples of each other. Therefore, we can choose these two polynomials as a spanning set for the subspace.
In conclusion, the spanning set for the subspace of polynomials of the form {p∈P2:p(x)=ax2+(a+b)x+b} is {x^2 + x, x + 1}.
Learn more about polynomials
https://brainly.com/question/1496352
#SPJ11
XYZ increased the number of TVs sold in one year by 100. That represents 1/3 more TVs sold last year. What was number of TVs sold last year?
The number of TVs sold last year can be determined by first calculating the increase in the number of TVs sold this year.
Given that XYZ increased the number of TVs sold in one year by 100, this represents 1/3 more TVs sold last year.
To find the number of TVs sold last year, we need to divide the increase by 1/3.
Let's denote the number of TVs sold last year as "x".
The increase in the number of TVs sold is 100.
So, we can set up the equation:
1/3 * x = 100.
To solve for x, we need to isolate it on one side of the equation.
To do this, we multiply both sides of the equation by 3:
1/3 * x * 3 = 100 * 3.
This simplifies to:
x = 300.
Therefore, the number of TVs sold last year was 300.
The number of TVs sold last year was 300.
XYZ increased the number of TVs sold in one year by 100, which represents 1/3 more TVs sold than the previous year. By setting up and solving the equation 1/3 * x = 100, we find that the number of TVs sold last year was 300
To know more about equation visit:
brainly.com/question/29538993
#SPJ11
