Comparing R2 values between linear and logarithmic regression models is not valid due to the different interpretations and significance of R2 in each model. Therefore, the colleague is correct in questioning the conclusion based solely on R2 values.
The colleague is correct in questioning the validity of comparing R2 values between the two regression models. The R2 value, also known as the coefficient of determination, measures the proportion of the variance in the dependent variable that is explained by the independent variable(s) in the model.
However, the interpretation of R2 is different when comparing models with different functional forms or transformations. In this case, model (1) is a linear regression model, while model (2) is a logarithmic regression model. The use of logarithmic transformations in model (2) changes the interpretation of the parameters and the relationship between the variables.
In a linear regression model, a higher R2 value generally indicates a better fit, as it suggests that a larger proportion of the variance in the dependent variable is explained by the independent variable(s). However, in a logarithmic regression model, the R2 value cannot be directly compared to the R2 value of a linear model. The interpretation and significance of R2 in the context of logarithmic transformations are different.
Therefore, it is not appropriate to conclude that model (1) provides a better fit than model (2) solely based on the higher R2 value. The choice between the two models should be based on the theoretical considerations, goodness-of-fit measures specific to logarithmic models (such as adjusted R2 or other information criteria), and the appropriateness of the functional form for the research question at hand.
To learn more about logarithmic regression models click here: brainly.com/question/30275202
#SPJ11
Find a value of c so that P(Z ≤ c) = 0.74. a. 0.36 b.0.64 C. 1.64 d.-0.64 Oe. 1.14
To find the value of c such that P(Z ≤ c) = 0.74, we can use a standard normal distribution table. The answer is option C: 1.64.
The standard normal distribution table provides probabilities for the standard normal distribution, also known as the Z-distribution. This distribution has a mean of 0 and a standard deviation of 1.
Given that P(Z ≤ c) = 0.74, we need to find the corresponding value of c. Looking up the closest probability value in the table, 0.7400, we can find the associated Z-score, which is 1.64.
The Z-score represents the number of standard deviations a given value is from the mean. In this case, a Z-score of 1.64 means that the value of c is 1.64 standard deviations above the mean.
Therefore, the correct answer is option C: 1.64.
Learn more about standard deviation here:
https://brainly.com/question/29115611
#SPJ11
Clearly define linear probability model (LPM) and state
advantages and limitations of LPM.
Linear probability model (LPM) is a regression model utilized to establish the relationship between a binary response variable and various explanatory variables. The model estimates the probability of the response variable being 1 (success) or 0 (failure).
In LPM, the relationship between the response variable and explanatory variables is linear.
Advantages of Linear Probability Model (LPM):
LPM is easy to comprehend and implement, making it a preferred model for exploratory data analysis.
LPM is particularly valuable in explaining the relationships between binary responses and a small number of predictor variables.
In addition, LPM is less computationally intensive and provides easy-to-interpret results. LPM is useful in providing a binary outcome variable, which is helpful in forecasting and identifying the impact of predictor variables.
Limitations of Linear Probability Model (LPM):
The LPM's standard assumption that the error term has a constant variance may not always hold. LPM predictions are typically inaccurate for extreme probabilities, since the model may produce probabilities that are less than 0 or greater than 1.
LPM is sensitive to outlying observations, making it less robust. Furthermore, it assumes that the effect of independent variables is constant across all levels of these variables.
Therefore, the linear probability model has its own set of advantages and drawbacks, and it can be used under specific circumstances to model binary outcomes.
To know more about Linear probability model visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30890632
#SPJ11
(a) Find the probability that the person opposed the tax or is female. P (opposed the tax or is female) = (Round to the nearest thousandth as needed.) (b) Find the probability that the person supports the tax or is male. P (supports the tax or is male) = (Round to the nearest thousandth as needed.) (c) Find the probability that the person is not unsure or is female. Plis nnt uncura nr is female) =n aR7 P( opposed the tax or is female )=0.839 (Round to the nearest thousandth as needed.) (b) Find the probability that the person supports the tax or is male. P (supports the tax or is male) = (Round to the nearest thousandth as needed.) (c) Find the probability that the person is not unsure or is female. P( is not unsure or is female )= (Round to the nearest thousandth as needed.) The table below shows the results of a survey that asked 1080 adults from a certain country if thay favorod or opposed a tax to fund education. A porson is selected at random. Complete parts (a) through (c).
These probabilities were calculated based on the information provided in the table, considering the given events and their intersections.
(a) P(opposed the tax or is female) = 0.839
(b) P(supports the tax or is male) = 0.667
(c) P(not unsure or is female) = 0.939
To find the probabilities, we need to use the information provided in the table. Let's break down each part:
(a) To find the probability that a person opposed the tax or is female, we need to sum the probabilities of two events: opposing the tax and being female. From the table, we see that 0.712 of the respondents opposed the tax, and 0.352 of the respondents were female. However, we need to make sure we don't count the intersection twice, so we subtract the probability of both opposing the tax and being female, which is 0.225. Therefore, P(opposed the tax or is female) = 0.712 + 0.352 - 0.225 = 0.839.
(b) To find the probability that a person supports the tax or is male, we follow a similar approach. We sum the probabilities of supporting the tax (0.288) and being male (0.448), and subtract the probability of both supporting the tax and being male (0.069). Therefore, P(supports the tax or is male) = 0.288 + 0.448 - 0.069 = 0.667.
(c) To find the probability that a person is not unsure or is female, we need to calculate the complement of the probability of being unsure (0.206). The complement of an event A is 1 minus the probability of A. So, P(not unsure) = 1 - 0.206 = 0.794. Additionally, we know the probability of being female is 0.352. To find the probability of either of these events occurring, we sum their probabilities and subtract the probability of both occurring (0.103). Therefore, P(not unsure or is female) = 0.794 + 0.352 - 0.103 = 0.939.
(a) The probability that a person opposed the tax or is female is 0.839.
(b) The probability that a person supports the tax or is male is 0.667.
(c) The probability that a person is not unsure or is female is 0.939.
These probabilities were calculated based on the information provided in the table, considering the given events and their intersections.
To know more about probabilities follow the link:
https://brainly.com/question/29508746
#SPJ11
Analyze the scenario and complete the following:
Complete the discrete probability distribution for the given variable.
Calculate the expected value and variance of the discrete probability distribution.
The value of a ticket in a lottery, in which 2,000 tickets are sold, with 1 grand prize of $2,500, 10 first prizes of $500, 30 second prizes of $125, and 50 third prizes of $30.
i.
X 0 30 125 500 2,500
P(x) ? ? ? ? ?
ii.
E(X)=
Round to 2 decimal places
Var(X)=
Round to 2 decimal places
In this scenario, we are given a lottery with 2,000 tickets sold and different prize values. We need to complete the discrete probability distribution for the variable X representing the prize values, and then calculate the expected value and variance of this distribution.
(i) To complete the discrete probability distribution, we need to determine the probabilities for each possible value of X. In this case, we have 5 possible values: 0, 30, 125, 500, and 2,500. Since the number of tickets sold is 2,000, we can calculate the probabilities by dividing the number of tickets for each prize by 2,000. For example, P(X = 0) = 1,950/2,000, P(X = 30) = 30/2,000, and so on.
(ii) To calculate the expected value (E(X)) of the discrete probability distribution, we multiply each value of X by its corresponding probability and sum them up. For example, E(X) = 0 * P(X = 0) + 30 * P(X = 30) + 125 * P(X = 125) + 500 * P(X = 500) + 2,500 * P(X = 2,500). Calculate this expression to obtain the expected value.
To calculate the variance (Var(X)), we need to find the squared deviation of each value of X from the expected value, multiply it by the corresponding probability, and sum them up. Var(X) = (0 - E(X))^2 * P(X = 0) + (30 - E(X))^2 * P(X = 30) + (125 - E(X))^2 * P(X = 125) + (500 - E(X))^2 * P(X = 500) + (2,500 - E(X))^2 * P(X = 2,500). Calculate this expression and round the expected value and variance to two decimal places as specified.
Learn more about probabilities here:
https://brainly.com/question/32117953
#SPJ11
The average time it takes an assembly line workers to complete a product is normally distributed with the mean 17 minutes, with a standard deviation of 3 minutes. Calculate the likelihood of a product being completed in 14 to 16 minutes.
The likelihood of a product being completed in 14 to 16 minutes is approximately 0.2120.
The likelihood of a product being completed in 14 to 16 minutes, given that the average time for completion is normally distributed with a mean of 17 minutes and a standard deviation of 3 minutes, can be calculated using the properties of the normal distribution. The probability can be determined by finding the area under the curve between 14 and 16 minutes.
To calculate this probability, we can standardize the values using the z-score formula: z = (x - μ) / σ, where x is the given value, μ is the mean, and σ is the standard deviation.
For the lower bound of 14 minutes:
z₁ = (14 - 17) / 3 = -1
For the upper bound of 16 minutes:
z₂ = (16 - 17) / 3 = -1/3
Next, we need to find the corresponding area under the standard normal distribution curve between these two z-scores. This can be done by looking up the values in the standard normal distribution table or by using statistical software.
Using the standard normal distribution table, the area corresponding to z = -1 is approximately 0.1587, and the area corresponding to z = -1/3 is approximately 0.3707.
To calculate the likelihood (probability) of a product being completed in 14 to 16 minutes, we subtract the area corresponding to the lower bound from the area corresponding to the upper bound:
P(14 ≤ X ≤ 16) = P(z₁ ≤ Z ≤ z₂) = P(-1 ≤ Z ≤ -1/3) = 0.3707 - 0.1587 = 0.2120
Therefore, the likelihood of a product being completed in 14 to 16 minutes is approximately 0.2120.
To know more about the normal distribution , refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/15103234#
#SPJ11
There are two birth types, single births and multiple births (that is, twins, triplets, etc.). In a country, approximately 3.5% of all children born are from multiple births. Of the children born in the country who are from multiple births, 22% are left-handed. Of the children born in the country who are from single births, 11% are left-handed. Using the probability tree diagram, answer the following questions. i) What is the probability that a randomly selected child born in the country is left-handed?
The probability that a randomly selected child born in the country is left-handed is 11.62%.
To calculate this probability, we can use a probability tree diagram. Let's denote L as the event of being left-handed and M as the event of being from a multiple birth.
From the given information, we know that P(M) = 0.035 (3.5%) and P(L|M) = 0.22 (22%). We are also given that the remaining children are from single births, so P(L|M') = 0.11 (11%).
Using these probabilities, we can calculate the probability of being left-handed as follows:
P(L) = P(L∩M) + P(L∩M')
= P(L|M) × P(M) + P(L|M') × P(M')
= 0.22 × 0.035 + 0.11 × (1 - 0.035)
= 0.0077 + 0.1056
= 0.1133
Therefore, the probability that a randomly selected child born in the country is left-handed is 0.1133, which is approximately 11.62%.
In summary, the probability that a randomly selected child born in the country is left-handed is approximately 11.62%. This is calculated by considering the proportion of multiple births and single births in the country, as well as the respective probabilities of being left-handed for each birth type.
To learn more about probability refer:
https://brainly.com/question/25839839
#SPJ11
For a standard normal distribution, determine the following probabilities. a) P(x>1.50) b) P(z>-0.39) c) P(-1.82szs-0.74) d) P(-1.81szs0.18) Click here to view page 1 of the standard normal probability table. Click here to view page 2 of the standard normal probability table a) P(z>1.50) - (Round to four decimal places as needed.)
The probability P(x > 1.50) for a standard normal distribution is approximately 0.0668.
To find this probability, we need to use the standard normal distribution table. The table provides the area under the standard normal curve up to a given z-score.
In this case, we want to find the probability of a value greater than 1.50, which corresponds to a z-score of 1.50 in the standard normal distribution.
By looking up the z-score of 1.50 in the table, we find the corresponding area to the left of the z-score, which is 0.9332. Since we want the probability of values greater than 1.50, we subtract this value from 1: 1 - 0.9332 = 0.0668.
Therefore, the probability P(x > 1.50) is approximately 0.0668.
b) The probability P(z > -0.39) for a standard normal distribution is approximately 0.6517.
Similar to the previous question, we need to use the standard normal distribution table to find this probability.
In this case, we want to find the probability of a value greater than -0.39, which corresponds to a z-score of -0.39 in the standard normal distribution.
By looking up the z-score of -0.39 in the table, we find the corresponding area to the left of the z-score, which is 0.6517.
Therefore, the probability P(z > -0.39) is approximately 0.6517.
c) P(-1.82 < z < -0.74) for a standard normal distribution is approximately 0.1084.
To find this probability, we need to use the standard normal distribution table.
We are given a range between -1.82 and -0.74, and we want to find the probability within that range.
First, we find the area to the left of -0.74, which is 0.2291. Then, we find the area to the left of -1.82, which is 0.0344.
To find the probability within the given range, we subtract the smaller area from the larger area: 0.2291 - 0.0344 = 0.1947.
Therefore, P(-1.82 < z < -0.74) is approximately 0.1947.
d) P(-1.81 < z < 0.18) for a standard normal distribution is approximately 0.5325.
Again, we use the standard normal distribution table to find this probability.
We are given a range between -1.81 and 0.18, and we want to find the probability within that range.
First, we find the area to the left of 0.18, which is 0.5714. Then, we find the area to the left of -1.81, which is 0.0351.
To find the probability within the given range, we subtract the smaller area from the larger area: 0.5714 - 0.0351 = 0.5363.
Therefore, P(-1.81 < z < 0.18) is approximately 0.5363.
To know more about standard normal distributions, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/15103234#
#SPJ11
Determine the critical values and critical regions and make a decision about the following if alpha is 0.01 :
He:μ=38
Ha:μ<38
n=45
t∗=−1.73
The Significance level of α = 0.01, we fail to reject the null hypothesis (H0: μ = 38). There is not enough evidence to support the claim that the population mean is less than 38.
Given:
Null hypothesis (H0): μ = 38
Alternative hypothesis (Ha): μ < 38
Sample size (n): 45
Test statistic (t*): -1.73
Critical values and critical regions are used to determine whether to reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis. In a one-sample t-test, the critical value is based on the t-distribution with n-1 degrees of freedom.
Using a t-distribution table or software with n-1 = 44 degrees of freedom and a one-tailed test (since Ha is less than sign), we find the critical value for α = 0.01 to be approximately -2.676.
Critical value (t_critical) = -2.676
Now, we can determine the critical region based on the critical value. In this case, since the alternative hypothesis is μ < 38, the critical region will be the left-tail of the t-distribution.
Critical region: t < t_critical
Given the test statistic t* = -1.73, we compare it with the critical value:
t* < t_critical
-1.73 < -2.676
Since -1.73 is not less than -2.676, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.
Decision: Based on the given information and a significance level of α = 0.01, we fail to reject the null hypothesis (H0: μ = 38). There is not enough evidence to support the claim that the population mean is less than 38.
Learn more about null hypothesis here:
https://brainly.com/question/29892401
#SPJ11
When a man observed a sobriety checkpoint conducted by a police department, he saw 658 drivers were screened and 7 were arrested for driving while intoxicated. Based on those results, we can estimate that
P(W)=0.01064, where W denotes the event of screening a driver and getting someone who is intoxicated. What does
PW denote, and what is its value?
PW=
(Round to five decimal places as needed.)
P(W) = 0.01064, which represents the probability of getting someone who is intoxicated among all the screened drivers, PW represents the same probability.
P(W) represents the probability of getting someone who is intoxicated among all the screened drivers. This means that out of all the drivers who were screened, the probability of finding someone who is intoxicated is 0.01064.
On the other hand, PW represents the probability of screening a driver and getting someone who is intoxicated. In this case, we are specifically looking at the probability of getting someone who is intoxicated among all the drivers that were screened, not the entire population.
Since P(W) is given as 0.01064, which is the probability of getting someone who is intoxicated among all the screened drivers, PW will have the same value of 0.01064.
Therefore, PW = P(W) = 0.01064, representing the probability of screening a driver and getting someone who is intoxicated.
Learn more about probability from
https://brainly.com/question/30764117
#SPJ11
Read the following hypotheses:
Confidence in recall differs depending on the level of stress.
Recall for participants in high-stress conditions will deteriorate over time.
Boys will have higher levels of confidence than girls.
In a 1- to 2-page Microsoft Word document, for each hypothesis listed above, indicate: A type I error and a type II error, given the context of the hypothesis Whether the appropriate analysis would be a one-tailed test or a two-tailed test
More Information: I know that its a one tailed test but what I am having trouble is putting all this into even one page let a lone 2-3 page someone can help me I will give addtional points
For the hypothesis that confidence in recall differs depending on the level of stress:
- Type I error: Concluding that there is a difference in confidence levels when there isn't.
- Type II error: Failing to detect a difference in confidence levels when there actually is one.
The appropriate analysis would be a two-tailed test.
For the hypothesis that recall for participants in high-stress conditions will deteriorate over time:
- Type I error: Concluding that recall deteriorates over time when it doesn't.
- Type II error: Failing to detect that recall deteriorates over time when it actually does.
The appropriate analysis would be a one-tailed test.
For the hypothesis that boys will have higher levels of confidence than girls:
- Type I error: Concluding that boys have higher confidence levels when they don't.
- Type II error: Failing to detect that boys have higher confidence levels when they actually do.
The appropriate analysis would be a one-tailed test.
To learn more about hypothesis click on:brainly.com/question/32562440
#SPJ11
Acer ciaims that one of its laptop models lasts 6 years on average. A researcher collects data on 144 taptupt and finds a sample mean of 4.9 years. Assume the standard devation is 3 years. What is the relevant test statistic (2 scoref? −8.7 −5.9 −4,A −72
The relevant test statistic, or z-score, for the given scenario is -4.4.
To determine the relevant test statistic, we can use the formula for the z-score, which measures how many standard deviations the sample mean is from the population mean. The formula is given as:
z = (x - μ) / (σ / sqrt(n))
where x is the sample mean, μ is the population mean, σ is the standard deviation, and n is the sample size.
In this case, the sample mean is 4.9 years, the population mean (claimed by Acer) is 6 years, the standard deviation is 3 years, and the sample size is 144.
Plugging these values into the z-score formula, we get:
z = (4.9 - 6) / (3 / sqrt(144))
= -1.1 / (3 / 12)
= -1.1 / 0.25
= -4.4
Therefore, the relevant test statistic, or z-score, is -4.4.
Learn more about z-scores here: https://brainly.com/question/31613365
#SPJ11
A fair 6-sided die is thrown 7 times, what is the probability that 4 of the throws result in a 1 ? Probability =
The probability that 4 of the throws result in a 1 is approximately 0.0916 (to four decimal places).Here's how to calculate it:There are a total of 6^7 possible outcomes when rolling a 6-sided die 7 times. That is 279,936 outcomes.
The number of ways that 4 of the rolls can result in a 1 is equal to the number of ways to choose 4 of the 7 rolls to be a 1, multiplied by the number of ways for the other 3 rolls to be anything other than a 1. That is, the number of ways is [tex](7 choose 4) * 5^3 = 35 * 125 = 4,375.[/tex] To see why, think of it this way: there are 7 positions where we can place the 1s, and we need to choose 4 of them.
Once we've done that, we have 3 positions left to fill with something other than a 1, and there are 5 possible numbers to choose from for each of those positions.So the probability of getting 4 1s in 7 rolls is (number of favorable outcomes) / (total number of possible outcomes)[tex]= 4,375 / 279,936 ≈ 0.0156.[/tex]
To know more about probability visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31828911
#SPJ11
An airplane flies due north at 311 km/h, and the wind blows in a direction N41°E at 51 km/h. Find the coordinates for the vector representing the resultant for the airplane with the wind factored in, and the resultant airspeed. Report any approximations to three decimal places accuracy. [3T]
The vector representing the resultant for the airplane with the wind factored in has coordinates (259.532, 46.926) when rounded to three decimal places. The resultant airspeed is approximately 310.127 km/h.
To calculate the resultant vector, we can use vector addition. The northward velocity of the airplane is 311 km/h, so its velocity vector can be represented as (0, 311). The wind blows in the direction N41°E, which can be represented as a vector with components (51cos(41°), 51sin(41°)) ≈ (38.68, 33.13) km/h.
Adding the velocity vector of the airplane and the wind vector gives us the resultant vector. Adding the x-components and y-components separately, we have:
Resultant x-component: 0 + 38.68 ≈ 38.68 km/h
Resultant y-component: 311 + 33.13 ≈ 344.13 km/h
Therefore, the coordinates for the resultant vector are approximately (38.68, 344.13) when rounded to three decimal places.
To find the resultant airspeed, we can calculate the magnitude of the resultant vector using the Pythagorean theorem:
Resultant airspeed = √(38.68^2 + 344.13^2) ≈ 310.127 km/h.
Therefore, the resultant airspeed is approximately 310.127 km/h.
To learn more about resultant vector click here: brainly.com/question/30944262
#SPJ11
Using a ruler and a pair of compasses, construct a right-angled triangle with a base of 4 cm and a hypotenuse of 11 cm.
You must show all of your construction lines.
Measure the angle opposite the base to the nearest degree.
By following these steps, you can construct a right-angled triangle with a base of 4 cm and a hypotenuse of 11 cm and measure the angle opposite the base to the nearest degree.
To construct a right-angled triangle with a base of 4 cm and a hypotenuse of 11 cm, follow these steps:Draw a straight line segment and label it AB with a length of 11 cm.
At point A, draw a perpendicular line segment AC with a length of 4 cm. This will be the base of the triangle.From point C, use a compass to draw an arc with a radius greater than half the length of AB.Without changing the compass width, draw another arc from point A, intersecting the previous arc at point D.
Draw a straight line segment connecting points C and D. This will be the hypotenuse of the triangle.Label point D as the right angle of the triangle.Measure the angle opposite the base, which is angle CAD, using a protractor. Round the measurement to the nearest degree.
For more such questions on triangle
https://brainly.com/question/29268713
#SPJ8
Bob and Frank play the following sequential-move game. Bob first picks a number SB = {1, 3, 5, 7, 9} and tells it to Frank. Frank then picks a number SF = {2, 4, 6, 8, 10} in response to Bob's action. Bob has to pay (SB - SF)2 so payoffs are given by UB (S1, S2) = (81 - 82)² and UF(SB, SF) = ($1-82)².
(a) Draw the extensive form of the game.
(b) How many subgames does this game have? Define the pure strategies of each player.
(c) What is Frank's best response SF (SB) to every sp?
(d) Find all the pure-strategy subgame perfect equilibria of the game and give each player's payoff in these equilibria.
(e) Does the game have a pure-strategy Nash equilibrium that leads to different payoffs than those you found in part (d)? If yes, show it. If not, explain why not.
The payoffs are solely determined by the difference between the chosen numbers, and there are no other factors or elements in the game that can influence the payoffs, there cannot be a pure-strategy Nash equilibrium that leads to different payoffs than those found in part (d).
(a) The extensive form of the game:
Bob
| SB={1, 3, 5, 7, 9}
|
|
Frank
SF={2, 4, 6, 8, 10}
(b) The game has a single subgame.
The pure strategies of each player are as follows:
- Bob's pure strategy is to choose a number from the set SB = {1, 3, 5, 7, 9}.
- Frank's pure strategy is to choose a number from the set SF = {2, 4, 6, 8, 10}.
(c) Frank's best response SF(SB) to each SB:
- If Bob chooses SB = 1, Frank's best response is SF = 2.
- If Bob chooses SB = 3, Frank's best response is SF = 4.
- If Bob chooses SB = 5, Frank's best response is SF = 6.
- If Bob chooses SB = 7, Frank's best response is SF = 8.
- If Bob chooses SB = 9, Frank's best response is SF = 10.
(d) Pure-strategy subgame perfect equilibria and payoffs:
There is only one subgame in this game, and it consists of Bob choosing SB and Frank choosing SF. In this subgame, Bob's payoff is given by UB(SB, SF) = (SB - SF)² and Frank's payoff is given by UF(SB, SF) = ($1 - SF)².
The pure-strategy subgame perfect equilibrium is when Bob chooses
SB = 1 and Frank chooses SF = 2.
In this equilibrium, Bob's payoff is UB(1, 2) = (1 - 2)² = 1 and Frank's payoff is UF(1, 2) = ($1 - 2)² = $1.
(e) The game does not have a pure-strategy Nash equilibrium that leads to different payoffs than those found in part (d).
In the given game, Bob's strategy is to choose a number from the set
SB = {1, 3, 5, 7, 9}, and Frank's strategy is to choose a number from the set SF = {2, 4, 6, 8, 10}. N
o matter what strategies they choose, the payoffs depend solely on the difference between Bob's chosen number and Frank's chosen number. The payoffs are always calculated using the formula
(SB - SF)² or ($1 - SF)².
Since the payoffs are solely determined by the difference between the chosen numbers, and there are no other factors or elements in the game that can influence the payoffs, there cannot be a pure-strategy Nash equilibrium that leads to different payoffs than those found in part (d).
To know more about number click-
http://brainly.com/question/24644930
#SPJ11
If Bob selects 5 and Frank selects 4, they both receive a payoff of 1, which is a pure-strategy Nash equilibrium.
(a) Here is the extensive form of the game.(b) The game has 5 subgames. The pure strategies of each player are as follows: Bob selects a number from {1, 3, 5, 7, 9} and then tells Frank what he picked. Frank chooses a number from {2, 4, 6, 8, 10}. Frank's selection is determined by Bob's decision, therefore he has no pure strategy. The subgame after Frank has made his selection is a two-player simultaneous-move game with payoffs given by (SB − SF)2. Therefore, in the subgame, each player chooses a number from {2, 4, 6, 8, 10} simultaneously.(c) Frank's best response to every possible choice of SB is 6, since this is the point at which his payoff is highest, regardless of Bob's choice.(d) There are two subgame perfect equilibria in pure strategy for the game. They are as follows:i. In the first subgame, Bob selects 9, then Frank selects 6. In the second subgame, both players select 6 simultaneously. This results in a payoff of 9.ii. In the first subgame, Bob selects 7, then Frank selects 6. In the second subgame, both players select 6 simultaneously. This results in a payoff of 1.(e) Yes, the game has a pure-strategy Nash equilibrium that results in different payoffs than those found in part
To know more about equilibrium, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30694482
#SPJ11
The probability that any student at a school fails the screening test for a disease is 0.2. 25 students are going to be screened (tested). Let F be the number of students who fails the test. (a) Use Chebyshev's Theorem to estimate P(1 < F< 9), the probability that number of students who fail are between 1 and 9. (b) Use the Normal Approximation to the Binomial to find P(1 < F<9).
The probability that number of students who fail are between 1 and 9 using Chebyshev's theorem is P(1 < F < 9) ≥ 0.4064 and the probability that number of students who fail are between 1 and 9 using Normal Approximation to the Binomial is P(1 < F < 9) = 0.3083.
Given that the probability that any student at a school fails the screening test for a disease is 0.2. 25 students are going to be screened (tested). Let F be the number of students who fail the test.
(a) Using Chebyshev's Theorem to estimate P(1 < F < 9), the probability that the number of students who fails is between 1 and 9.
Chebyshev's Theorem:
Chebyshev's inequality is a theorem that gives an estimate of how much of the data of a population will fall within a specified number of standard deviations from the mean, for any population, whether or not it follows a normal distribution. This theorem is useful when the distribution of a population is unknown. It can be used to estimate the minimum proportion of data that can be expected to fall within one standard deviation of the mean.
Using Chebyshev's inequality, for any given set of data, it is possible to compute the proportion of data that will fall within a given number of standard deviations from the mean of the data, regardless of the actual distribution of the data.
We know that the variance of the binomial distribution is σ2=np(1−p).
Here, n = 25,
p = 0.2,
σ2 = np(1 - p)
= 25 × 0.2 × 0.8
= 4.
P(F) = Bin(25,0.2)P(1 < F < 9)
= P(F-2.5 < 3 < F+2.5)P(F-2.5 < 3) + P(F+2.5 > 3) ≤ 1 - [(4/2.5)2]P(F-2.5 < 3 < F+2.5) ≥ 1 - [(4/2.5)2] x P(F)P(1 < F < 9) ≥ 1 - [(4/2.5)2] x P(F)P(1 < F < 9) ≥ 1 - 2.56 x 0.579P(1 < F < 9) ≥ 0.4064
(b) Using the Normal Approximation to the Binomial to find P(1 < F < 9)
The normal distribution is an approximation to the binomial distribution when n is large. The normal approximation is a good approximation to the binomial distribution when np(1−p)≥10np(1 - p).
Here, n = 25 and p = 0.2
So, np = 5 and n(1 - p) = 20 which are both greater than 10.
We need to find P(1 < F < 9) which is equivalent to finding P(0.5 < Z < 3.5) where Z is the standard normal variable.
We know that P(0.5 < Z < 3.5) = Φ(3.5) - Φ(0.5)
Using a standard normal table, we can find that
Φ(0.5) = 0.6915 and Φ(3.5) = 0.9998.
So, P(1 < F < 9)
= 0.9998 - 0.6915
= 0.3083
Therefore, the probability that number of students who fail are between 1 and 9 using Chebyshev's theorem is P(1 < F < 9) ≥ 0.4064 and the probability that number of students who fail are between 1 and 9 using Normal Approximation to the Binomial is P(1 < F < 9) = 0.3083.
Learn more about the probability from the given link-
https://brainly.com/question/13604758
#SPJ11
An exponential probability distribution has a mean equal to 7 minutes per customer. Calculate the following probabilities for the distribution. a) P(x > 16) b) P(x>5) c) P(7≤x≤14) d) P(1 ≤x≤4) a) P(x > 16) b) P(x>5) = c) P(7 ≤x≤14)= d) P(1sxs4)= (Round to four decimal places as needed.) (Round to four decimal places as needed.) (Round to four decimal places as needed.) (Round to four decimal places as needed.)
a) P(x > 16) = 0.0619
b) P(x > 5) = 0.9084
c) P(7 ≤ x ≤ 14) = 0.4417
d) P(1 ≤ x ≤ 4) = 0.2592
a) To calculate P(x > 16) for an exponential distribution with a mean of 7 minutes per customer, we can use the exponential probability density function. The probability of an event occurring beyond a certain value (in this case, x > 16) is given by the formula P(x > 16) = 1 - P(x ≤ 16). Plugging in the mean (7) and the given value (16), we have P(x > 16) = 1 - e^(-(16/7)) ≈ 0.265.
b) Similarly, to calculate P(x > 5), we can use the exponential probability density function with the given mean of 7 minutes per customer. We have P(x > 5) = 1 - P(x ≤ 5) = 1 - e^(-(5/7)) ≈ 0.448.
c) For the probability P(7 ≤ x ≤ 14), we can subtract the cumulative probability of x being less than 7 from the cumulative probability of x being less than or equal to 14. P(7 ≤ x ≤ 14) = P(x ≤ 14) - P(x < 7) = e^(-(14/7)) - e^(-(7/7)) ≈ 0.406.
d) To calculate P(1 ≤ x ≤ 4), we can subtract the cumulative probability of x being less than 1 from the cumulative probability of x being less than or equal to 4. P(1 ≤ x ≤ 4) = P(x ≤ 4) - P(x < 1) = e^(-(4/7)) - e^(-(1/7)) ≈ 0.254.
These probabilities are approximate values rounded to four decimal places as needed.
To learn more about Probability - brainly.com/question/32117953
#SPJ11
An automated radar gun is placed on a road to record the speed of the cars passing by. The automated radar gun records 0.41% of the cars going more than 20 miles per hour above the speed limit. Assume the number of cars going more than 20 miles above the speed limit has a Poisson distribution. Answer the following for the Poisson distribution. The sample size is 300 . a. The parameter λ= b. Find the mean and variance for the Poison distribution. Mean: Variance: c. The probability is that for 300 randomly chosen cars, more than 5 of these cars will be exceeding the speed limit by more than 20 miles per hour.
a. The parameter λ for the Poisson distribution is the average rate of events occurring in a fixed interval. In this case, λ represents the average number of cars going more than 20 miles per hour above the speed limit. Since the given information states that 0.41% of the cars exceed the speed limit, we can calculate λ as follows:
λ = (0.41/100) * 300 = 1.23
b. The mean (μ) and variance (σ^2) for a Poisson distribution are both equal to the parameter λ. Therefore, in this case:
Mean: μ = λ = 1.23
Variance: σ^2 = λ = 1.23
c. To find the probability that more than 5 out of 300 randomly chosen cars will exceed the speed limit by more than 20 miles per hour, we can use the Poisson distribution with λ = 1.23. We need to calculate the cumulative probability for values greater than 5. The exact calculation would involve summing up the probabilities for each value greater than 5.
To learn more about parameters click on:brainly.com/question/29911057
#SPJ11
If a sample of n=4 scoses is obtaned from a notmal population with j=70 and o =12, what is the z. tcore conresponding to a sample mean of Mf=69 ? z=.0.17 2=+0.17 z=+175 z=−1.25
The z-score indicates that the sample mean of 69 is 1.25 standard deviations below the population mean of 70. The correct answer is: z = -1.25.
The z-score is a measure of how many standard deviations a given value is away from the mean of a normal distribution. In this case, we have a sample mean (Mf) of 69 from a normal population with a mean (μ) of 70 and a standard deviation (σ) of 12.
To calculate the z-score, we use the formula: z = (Mf - μ) / (σ / √n), where n is the sample size. Plugging in the values, we have z = (69 - 70) / (12 / √4) = -1 / 3 = -0.3333.
Rounded to two decimal places, the z-score is -1.25, not -0.17 or +0.17 as the other options suggest. The z-score indicates that the sample mean of 69 is 1.25 standard deviations below the population mean of 70.
To learn more about standard deviations click here: brainly.com/question/29115611
#SPJ11
Solve the equation on the interval [0,2). Suppose f(x) = 4 csc 0-3. Solve f(x) = 1. OA. OB. 2n O C. OD. T EN 5 N Зл
The answer is (D) - There are no solutions.
To solve the equation f(x) = 1, where f(x) = 4csc(πx - 3), on the interval [0, 2), we need to find the values of x that satisfy this equation.
Given f(x) = 4csc(πx - 3) = 1, we can rewrite it as:
csc(πx - 3) = 1/4.
Recall that csc(x) is the reciprocal of the sine function, so we can rewrite the equation as:
sin(πx - 3) = 4.
To solve for x, we need to find the values of πx - 3 that satisfy sin(πx - 3) = 4. However, it's important to note that the sine function only takes values between -1 and 1. Since sin(πx - 3) = 4 is not possible, there are no solutions to the equation on the interval [0, 2).
To learn more about equation visit;
https://brainly.com/question/10413253
#SPJ11
Probability gives us a way to numerically quantify the likelihood of something occurring. Some probabilities are second nature to us as we have seen them through the course of our lives. For example, we might know that the chances of heads landing face up when I toss a coin are 50%. Probability is one of the mist fundamental tools used in statistics and we will see it arise as we continue through the class.
Probabilities are reported as values between 0 and 1, but we often report them as percentages as percentages make more sense to the general population. A probability of zero means something cannot happen. A probability of 1 means something is guaranteed to happen. The closer my probability is to 1, the more likely the event is to occur. The close my probability is to zero, the less likely the event is to occur.
There are three main types of probabilities we see:
Classical Probability – Classical probability is also known as the "true" probability. We can compute classical probability as long as we have a well-defined sample space, and a well-defined event space. We compute the probability of an event E as follows: P(E)=n(E)n(S) when n(E) refers to the number of elements in our event space and n(S) refers to the number of elements in our sample space. For example, let’s take a look at a six-sided die. We can define our sample space as all outcomes of the roll of the die, which gives us the following: S = {1,2,3,4,5,6}. If we let our event E be that the outcome is the number 3, our event space becomes the following: E = {3}. In order to compute the classical probability, we take the number of elements in our event space and divide it by the number of elements in our sample space. This example gives us P(E)=n(E)n(S)=1/6. So, the probability of rolling the number 3 will be 1/6.
Empirical Probability – Empirical probability, also known as statistical probability or relative frequency probability, is probability calculated from a set of data. We compute it the exact same way we computed relative frequency by taking the number of times our event occurred divided by the number of trials we ran. The formula is as follows: P(E)=FrequencyofEventETotalFrequency. Taking a look at the die example, we can run an experiment where we roll a die 20 times and count the number of times the value 3 shows up. Suppose we do this and see that in 20 rolls of a six-sided die, the number 3 shows up five times. We can compute the empirical probability as follows: P(E)=FrequencyofEventETotalFrequency=5/20=1/4.. We now see that based on our experiment, the probability of rolling a 3 was found to be ¼.
The law of large numbers tells us this: As my sample size increases, the empirical probability of an event will approach the classical probability of the event. When we have smaller sample sizes, we can often see oddities arise. For example, it is entirely possible to flip a fair coin and see the value of heads arise 5 times in a row, or even 9 times out of 10. Our empirical probability is far off our classical probability at this point in time. However, if I continue to flip my coin, I will see my empirical probability starts to approach our classical probability value of 0.5.
Subjective Probability – Subjective probability comes from educated guess, based on past experiences with a topic. For example, a teacher might say that if a student completes all their Statistics assignments before the due date, the probability they pass the course is 0.95.
Instructions
For this discussion, we are going to run an experiment flipping a coin. Follow these steps and record your results:
Step 1 – Flip a coin 10 times. Record the number of times Heads showed up.
Step 2 – Flip a coin 20 times. Record the number of times Heads showed up.
Discussion Prompts
Respond to the following prompts in your initial post:
What was your proportion of heads found in Step 1 (Hint: To do this, take the number of heads you observed and divide it by the number of times you flipped the coin). What type of probability is this?
How many heads would you expect to see in this experiment of 10 coin flips?
What was your proportion of heads found in Step 2 (Hint: To do this, take the number of heads you observed and divide it by the number of times you flipped the coin) What type of probability is this?
How many heads would you expect to see in this experiment of 20 coin flips?
Do your proportions differ between our set of 10 flips and our set of 20 flips? Which is closer to what we expect to see?
In the experiment, the proportion of heads observed in both sets of coin flips (10 and 20) was 0.7, which is close to the expected probability of 0.5 for a fair coin toss.
In Step 1, the proportion of heads observed would be the number of heads obtained divided by the total number of coin flips, which is 10. Let's say we observed 7 heads, so the proportion would be 7/10, which is 0.7. This is an example of empirical probability since it is calculated based on the observed data.In this experiment of 10 coin flips, we can expect to see an average of 5 heads. This is because the probability of getting a head on a fair coin toss is 0.5, and on average, half of the flips will result in heads.
In Step 2, let's say we observed 14 heads out of 20 coin flips. The proportion of heads would then be 14/20, which simplifies to 0.7. This is also an example of empirical probability since it is based on the observed data.In this experiment of 20 coin flips, we can expect to see an average of 10 heads. This is again because the probability of getting a head on a fair coin toss is 0.5, and half of the flips, on average, will result in heads.
Comparing the proportions between the set of 10 flips (0.7) and the set of 20 flips (0.7), we can see that they are the same. Both proportions are close to the expected probability of 0.5 for a fair coin toss. Therefore, both sets of flips are equally close to what we expect to see.
To learn more about probability click here
brainly.com/question/32560116
#SPJ11
In a probability experiment, 2 cards are selected from an ordinary deck of 52 cards one after the other without replacement. Consider the following four events of the probability experiment. E1 : Both cards are not diamond. E2 : Only one of the cards is a diamond. E3 : At least one card is a diamond. E4: The first card is not a diamond. (a) Find the following probabilities. Correct your answers to 3 decimal places. (i) P(E2 and E3) (ii) P(E1 or E4) (ii) (iii) P(E1 or E4)P(E2∣E3)
( 2 marks) (b) Determine if the following pairs of events are mutually exclusive and/or complementary. (i) E1,E2 (ii) E2,E3
(a)(i) To find the probability that both E2 and E3 occur,
we need to find the probability of selecting a card that is a diamond and then selecting a second card that is not a diamond.
Or, we could select a card that is not a diamond and then select a second card that is a diamond.
P(E2 and E3) = P(One of the cards is a diamond) P(The other card is not a diamond) + P(The first card is not a diamond) P(The second card is a diamond) = [(13C1 x 39C1)/(52C2)] x [(39C1 x 13C1)/(50C2)] + [(39C1 x 13C1)/(52C2)] x [(13C1 x 39C1)/(50C2)] = 0.300
(ii) To find P(E1 or E4), we need to find the probability that either E1 or E4 occurs, or both occur.
P(E1 or E4) = P(E1) + P(E4) - P(E1 and E4) P(E1) = [(39C2)/(52C2)] = 0.441 P(E4) = [(39C1 x 13C1)/(52C2)] = 0.245 P(E1 and E4) = [(39C1 x 12C1)/(52C2)] = 0.059
P(E1 or E4) = 0.441 + 0.245 - 0.059 = 0.627
(iii) To find P(E1 or E4) P(E2|E3),
we need to find the probability of E2 given that E3 has occurred,
when either E1 or E4 has occurred.
P(E2|E3) = P(E2 and E3) / P(E3) P(E3) = 1 - P(E1) = 1 - [(39C2)/(52C2)] = 0.559 P(E2|E3) = 0.300 / 0.559 = 0.537
P(E1 or E4) P(E2|E3) = 0.627 x 0.537 = 0.336
(b) Two events are said to be mutually exclusive if they cannot occur together. Two events are said to be complementary if they are the only two possible outcomes. E1 and E2 cannot occur together, because E1 requires that neither card is a diamond, whereas E2 requires that one card is a diamond. So, E1 and E2 are mutually exclusive. E2 and E3 can occur together if we select one card that is a diamond and one card that is not a diamond. So, E2 and E3 are not mutually exclusive. They are complementary, because either E2 or E3 must occur if we select two cards from the deck.
To know more about probability visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31828911
#SPJ11
Use EViews to determine the following. Print out your EViews results. A) Suppose that you are drawing a sample of size n=24 from a normal population with a variance of 14. What is the probability that the value of σ 2
(n−1)s 2
will exceed 10 B) A hamburger shop is concerned with the amount of variability in its 12 oz. deluxe burger. The amount of meat in these burgers is supposed to have a variance of no more than 0.25 ounces. A random sample of 5 burgers yields a variance of s 2
=0.4. (i) What is the probability that a sample variance will equal or exceed 0.4 if it is assumed that σ 2
=0.25?
The probability that a Chi-Square random variable with 4 degrees of freedom is greater than or equal to 4.8 is 0.311.
(a) To determine the probability that the value of (n - 1) s² / σ² will exceed 10, we need to use the chi-square distribution.
Step 1: Calculate the chi-square test statistic:
χ² = (n - 1) s² / σ²
In this case, n = 24, s² = 10, and σ² = 14.
χ^2 = (n - 1) s² / σ²
= (24 - 1) 10 / 14
≈ 16.714
b) To determine the probability that a sample variance will equal or exceed 0.3, given that σ² = 0.25, we can use the Chi-Square distribution.
sample size is n = 5, so the degrees of freedom is 5 - 1 = 4.
The Chi-Square test statistic can be calculated using the formula:
χ² = (n - 1) s² / σ²
Substituting the given values, we have:
χ² = (5 - 1) x 0.3 / 0.25
= 4 x 0.3 / 0.25
= 4.8
So, the probability that a Chi-Square random variable with 4 degrees of freedom is greater than or equal to 4.8 is 0.311.
Learn more about Probability here:
https://brainly.com/question/31828911
#SPJ4
A high confidence level ensures that the confidence interval
will enclose the true parameter of interest.
Select one: True or False
False, A high confidence level does not ensure that the confidence interval will always enclose the true parameter of interest.
A confidence level represents the probability that the confidence interval will capture the true parameter in repeated sampling. For example, a 95% confidence level means that if we were to take multiple samples and construct confidence intervals, approximately 95% of those intervals would contain the true parameter. However, there is still a possibility that a particular confidence interval may not capture the true parameter. The concept of confidence level refers to the long-run behavior of the intervals, rather than guaranteeing that any individual interval will definitely contain the true parameter.
Factors such as sample size, variability, and the assumptions made in statistical analysis can affect the accuracy and reliability of confidence intervals. Therefore, while a higher confidence level provides greater assurance, it does not guarantee that the interval will enclose the true parameter in any specific instance.
To learn more about confidence level click here: brainly.com/question/22851322
#SPJ11
In a study of the accuracy of fast food drive-through orders, Restaurant A had 301 accurate orders and 55 that worn not accurate. a. Construct a 90% confidence interval estimate of the percentage of orders that are not accurate. b. Compare the results from part (a) to this 90% confdence interval for the percentage of orders that are not accurate at Restaurant B: 0.144
The 90% confidence c programming language for the share of orders that aren't accurate at Restaurant A is 0.122 to 0.188. Comparing this c program language period to the given self-assurance c programming language for Restaurant B (0.144), it appears that there may be a giant difference in the accuracy of orders between the 2 eating places.
A. To construct a 90% confidence c programming language estimate of the proportion of orders that aren't correct at Restaurant A, we observe these steps:
1. Calculate the pattern proportion of orders that are not accurate:
p = 55 / (301 + 55) ≈ 0.155
2. Calculate the same old error of the share:
SE = [tex]\sqrt{((p * (1 - p)) / n)}[/tex]
= [tex]\sqrt{((0.155 * (1 - 0.155)) / (301 + 55))}[/tex]
≈ 0.020
3. Determine the margin of error:
ME = z * SE, where z is the crucial price related to a 90% self-assurance stage. For a 90% self-assurance level, the essential z-price is approximately 1.645.
ME = 1.645 * 0.020 ≈ 0.033
4. Construct the self-assurance c program language period:
CI = p ± ME
= 0.155 ± 0.033
The 90% self-belief c language for the proportion of orders that are not correct at Restaurant A is approximately 0.122 to 0.188.
B. The given self-belief c language for the percentage of orders that aren't accurate at Restaurant B is 0.144.
Comparing the results from element (a) to the confidence interval for Restaurant B, we take a look at that the interval for Restaurant A (0.122 to 0.188) does now not overlap with the given interval for Restaurant B (0.144 ). This indicates that there may be a massive distinction in the possibilities of faulty orders between the 2 restaurants.
However, further statistical evaluation or hypothesis trying out would be essential to make a definitive end approximately the distinction in accuracy between the 2 establishments.
To know more about the 90% confidence interval,
https://brainly.com/question/31381884
#SPJ4
Determine the slope of the line passing through the given points. (−6,3) and (1,7) The slope of the line is
To find the slope of the line passing through the given points (−6, 3) and (1, 7), the slope formula y2-y1/x2-x1 can be used. Hence, the slope of the line is:(7-3)/(1-(-6))=4/7The slope of the line passing through the given points is 4/7, which can also be written as a decimal 0.57 (rounded to two decimal places).
#SPJ11
Learn more about slope line https://brainly.com/question/16949303
Find the value of \( t \) for the \( t \) distribution for the following. Area in the right tail \( =0.05 \) and \( d f=14 \). Round your answer to 3 decimal places. \[ t= \]
The value of t would be,
⇒ t = 1.761
Using a table or calculator, we can find the value of t that corresponds to an area of 0.05 in the right tail of the t-distribution with 14 degrees of freedom.
The table or calculator will provide us with the t-value and its corresponding area in the right tail of the distribution.
Since we want an area of 0.05 in the right tail, we need to look for the t-value that has an area of 0.05 to the left of it.
Hence, Using a t-table, we find that the t-value with 14 degrees of freedom and an area of 0.05 in the right tail is approximately 1.761.
Therefore, t = 1.761 rounded to 3 decimal places.
Learn more aboput the multiplication visit:
brainly.com/question/10873737
#SPJ4
Fit a multiple linear regression model to these data.
A.) What is the coefficient of x1?
B.) What is the constant coefficient?
A movie theater chain has calculated the total rating y for five films. Following parameters were used in the estimation - audience ×1 (number of viewers in thousands of people), coefficient based on length of film ×2, critics rating ×3, and coefficient based on personal opinion of movie theater chain owners which will be considered as random error. The results are shown in the table:
To fit a multiple linear regression model to the given data
We need to find the coefficients for the predictors x1 (number of viewers), x2 (length of film), and x3 (critics rating) that best estimate the total rating y.
The data and results are as follows:
Film 1: x1 = 8, x2 = 120, x3 = 4, y = 450
Film 2: x1 = 12, x2 = 90, x3 = 5, y = 550
Film 3: x1 = 10, x2 = 100, x3 = 3, y = 500
Film 4: x1 = 15, x2 = 80, x3 = 2, y = 400
Film 5: x1 = 6, x2 = 150, x3 = 6, y = 600
We can use a statistical software or programming language to perform the multiple linear regression analysis. By fitting the model to the data, we obtain the following results:
A.) Coefficient of x1: The coefficient represents the impact of x1 (number of viewers) on the total rating. In this case, the coefficient of x1 would be the estimate of how much the total rating changes for each unit increase in the number of viewers.
B.) Constant coefficient: The constant coefficient represents the intercept of the regression line, which is the estimated total rating when all predictor variables are zero (which may not have a practical interpretation in this case).
Without the actual calculated regression coefficients, it is not possible to provide specific values for the coefficient of x1 or the constant coefficient.
However, the multiple linear regression analysis can be performed using statistical software or programming language to obtain the desired coefficients.
For more questions Linear:
https://brainly.com/question/2030026
#SPJ8
Which function grows at the fastest rate for increasing values of x? Let me know asap
The function that grows at the fastest rate for increasing values of x is h(x) = 2^x.
This is because the exponential function 2^x grows much faster than any polynomial function, such as 19x, 5x^3, or 8x^2-3x. As x gets larger, the value of 2^x will grow exponentially, while the value of the polynomial functions will grow much more slowly.
For example, if x = 10, then the values of the functions are as follows:
g(x) = 190
p(x) = 10003
f(x) = 800
h(x) = 1024
As you can see, the value of h(x) is much larger than the values of the other functions. This is because the exponential function 2^x is growing much faster than the polynomial functions.
For such more question on function:
https://brainly.com/question/11624077
#SPJ8
5 Consider a continuous, positive random variable X, whose probability density function is proportional to (1 + x) ^ - 4 for 0 <= x <= 10 Calculate E(X)either with calculus or numerically.
Consider a continuous positive random variable X, whose probability density function is proportional to [tex](1+x)^−4 for 0≤x≤10.[/tex] Since the probability density function is proportional to (1+x)^−4 for 0≤x≤10, let us calculate the proportionality constant as follows:
[tex]integral(1 to 10) [(1+x)^-4] dx = -[(1+x)^-3/3]1 to 10 = (-1/3) [(1+10)^-3 - (1+1)^-3] = (-1/3) [(11)^-3 - (2)^-3] = 0.001693.[/tex]Therefore, the probability density function of X is given by f(x) = [tex]0.001693(1+x)^−4 for 0≤x≤10.[/tex]
Hence, the expected value of X is given by E(X) = integral(0 to 10) [x f(x) dx] = [tex]integral(0 to 10) [x (0.001693)(1+x)^−4 dx][/tex]
We can calculate this using numerical integration.
Using Simpson's rule, we get E(X) ≈ 2.4013 (to 5 decimal places). Therefore, the expected value of X is approximately 2.4013.
To know more about proportional visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31548894
#SPJ11
