Answer:
all the above
Explanation:
because that is the answer
Answer:
all of the above
(you can give the other answer brainliest now that there are two answers :))
How might living near a river or lake affect how people live?
Living near a river or lake could affect how people live in many different ways...
Here's a list on how it can affect how people live.
___________________________________________________________
Bad...
Increases chances on flooding.Kids may try to swim and drown.You may get bitten by snapping turtles.There are water moccasins.___________________________________________________________
Good...
You get to go fishing pretty much in your yard.A food source of fish.You can swim.___________________________________________________________
[tex]Hope\;this\;helped!\;If so,\;please\;mark\;me\;as\;brainliest!\\\\\left[\begin{array}{ccc}Thanks,\;Plip\end{array}\right][/tex]
Important Egyptian Achievements
Answer:
there are many
Explanation:
The Egyptian's inventions were many and it might be easier to list the things they did not invent such as the wheel; not unexpected in a country where everyone travels on water. ...
The Pyramids. ...
Writing. ...
Papyrus Sheets. ...
Black Ink. ...
The Ox-drawn Plough. ...
The Sickle. ...
Irrigation.
How did the arrivals of europeans affect the native American
Answer:
Europeans carried a hidden enemy to the Indians: new diseases. Native peoples of America had no immunity to the diseases that European explorers and colonists brought with them. Diseases such as smallpox, influenza, measles, and even chicken pox proved deadly to American Indians.
Explanation:
Answer:
The Europeans brougth over diseases that the Natives weren't adapted to, therefor killing many of teh Native Americans. The arrival also introduced new products for trading, and new ideas. The Europeans eventually went to war against the Indians and took over. The Indians were almost wiped out and forced to leave their homes.
How did the Native American War in the 19th century impact the country?
the Native American Wars in the 19th century had far-reaching consequences for both Native Americans and the country as a whole.
The Native American Wars in the 19th century had a significant impact on the country, which resulted in changes in Native American culture and their way of life, as well as the economic and social impact on America. The US government's westward expansion brought it into contact with the Native American tribes that inhabited the land.
Many tribes were forcibly removed from their land, leading to the Indian Wars. In the 1860s and 1870s, the government established military forts and settlements across the West, resulting in skirmishes between settlers, the military, and Native Americans.
During the Indian Wars, thousands of Native Americans were killed, and entire tribes were forced from their homes and onto reservations. The Dawes Act of 1887, also known as the General Allotment Act, led to the division of Native American lands into individual plots. This move attempted to assimilate Native Americans into American culture by forcing them to abandon their traditional communal lifestyles, but it ended up having long-term negative impacts on Native American communities and cultures.
The Indian Wars also had economic and social impacts on America. The federal government invested significant resources in waging war against Native Americans, which had the long-term impact of promoting expansion and westward settlement. It also contributed to the decline of Native American cultures, as well as their exclusion from economic and social institutions.
For more such questions on Native Americans, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/24724492
#SPJ8
Briefly describe ONE major difference between Nash’s and Maier’s historical interpretations of the origins of the American Revolution.
Answer:
The answer is below
Explanation:
Gary Nash thinks that the defining factor in the colonist's agitation for independence from the British rule is the new ideas coming from emerging social and commercial associations which eventually led to Revolution against Great Britain to establish a preferred democratic social and political arrangement.
On the other hand, Pauline Maier believes that the main factor comes from the old Ideas dating back into English history around the age of discovery which enabled all the British colonies to form alliances in the American revolutionary movement.
the __ of liberty ensured that women didnt purchase british goods; if british cloth wasnt imported more homespun cloth had to be made
Answer:
Daughters!
Explanation:
Please give brainly:)
How did Ford deal with Nixon during his own presidency?
Answer:
Ford attempted to extract a public statement of contrition from Nixon before issuing the pardon, but Nixon refused. On September 8, 1974, Ford issued Proclamation 4311, which gave Nixon a full and unconditional pardon for any crimes he might have committed against the United States while president.
Explanation:
What factors led to the expansion of slave labor in the southern colonies?
Answer:
Explanation:
Factors that led to the expansion of slave labor in the southern colonies were that there was a rise in the need for rice, tobacco and sugar canes. This caused an increase for slaves
What effect did the British blockade of the Atlantic coast have on the war?
Answer:
Britain began a naval blockade of Germany. This strategy proved effective, cutting off vital military and civilian supplies and helping the Allies to eventually win the war.
Explanation:
Lincoln worried about resupplying Fort Sumter because he planned to tell Union soldiers to abandon the fort later. he did not want Confederate soldiers to take over the fort. he did not want to appear to give in to the Confederacy. he planned to start an armed conflict with Southern soldiers there.
Answer:
he did not want to appear to give in to the Confederacy
Explanation:
Abraham Lincoln ended his career in law at the time when the Kansas-Nebraska Act was passed. He believed slavery should not spread. He belonged to two political parties-the Whigs and Republicans. Lincoln worried about resupplying Fort Sumter because he did not want to appear to give in to the Confederacy.
Answer:
c
Explanation:
Which group formed the Sons of Liberty? What are some of the things the
Sons of Liberty participated in?
Answer:
The Loyal nine formed the Sons of Liberty. The first big action they took was protest the Stamp Act.
.After General Stonewall Jackson's death, who took over his position in the Confederate army?
A. Nathan Forrest
B. Braxton Bragg
C. George Pickett
D. James Longstreet
After General Stonewall Jackson's death, James Longstreet took over his position in the Confederate army.
So, the correct answer is D.
What was Stonewall Jackson’s role in the Civil War?Thomas J. "Stonewall" Jackson was a Confederate general during the American Civil War who gained fame for his tactical brilliance and tenacity on the battlefield. Jackson was responsible for some of the Confederacy's most important victories, including the First Battle of Bull Run and the Battle of Chancellorsville.
After he was shot by friendly fire at the Battle of Chancellorsville, Stonewall Jackson died on May 10, 1863. His death was a significant loss for the Confederacy. James Longstreet, one of Robert E. Lee's most trusted generals, took over command of his corps after his death.
Therefore, the correct answer on this question is D. James Longstreet.
Learn more about Civil War at https://brainly.com/question/1020924
#SPJ11
according to federalist #47, what is the main job of each branch
Answer:
The Legislative Branch makes laws, the Executive carries out the laws (president, vice president ect.), and the Judicial assesses (evaluates) the laws (Supreme Court)
Explanation:
Circle all of the reasons the colonists were upset about the Proclamation of 1763. (Multiple Answers) (3 Points) The colonists and colonial governments could not gain land west of the Appalachian Mountains The colonists had to give up their lands in New England. The colonists already living west of the Appalachian Mountains had to move back east. Only traders who were approved by the British Government could travel west.
Answer:
The colonists already living west of the Appalachian Mountains had to move back east. Only traders who were approved by the British Government could travel west.
Explanation:
When the French and Indian war ended, the British sought to appease the Native Americans by making sure there were no encroachment by the European settlers on their home lands. The British issued the proclamation of 1763. colonists were upset about the Proclamation of as they were presented from moving beyond the Appalachian Mountains and they were asked to go back to the east of the mountains
how did the athenian government select representatives from each tribe?
Explanation:
The Council of 500 represented the full-time government of Athens. ... The Council would meet to discuss and vote on “Preliminary decrees” (probouleumata, προβουλεύματα), and any of these that passed the Council's vote went on for discussion and voting in the Assembly.
The Third Estate was angry at the French government so...
Answer: They broke away from the government and signed the tennis court oath
Explanation:
africans in British colonies resisted slavery by
A. Vote for representatives who were against slavery.
B. Allowing slave owners to enslave their children.
C. Refusing to learn to read and write the English language.
D. Resisting in small ways that hurt slave owners business
Answer: what is it
Explanation:
Answer:
D
Explanation:
Charles Inglis was a member of which side of the American Revolution?
A. Loyalists
B. Patriots
C. French
Charles Inglis was a member of the Loyalist side of the American Revolution. Thus, option A is the correct option.
How Charles Inglis was a loyalist?It is documented that Inglis, a Loyalist, prayed openly for King George III while George Washington was present. Militia swiftly encircled the church. Inglis' house was broken into. Once the Loyalists were driven out of New York in November 1783, Inglis went back to England. His church was torched and his possessions seized because he backed the British during the American Revolution (1775–83); as a result, in 1783, he moved to Nova Scotia.
As the first Anglican bishop of Nova Scotia and its dependent nations, including Newfoundland, Prince Edward Island, Quebec, and Bermuda, Inglis was ordained in 1787. Inglis, like many of his loyalist contemporaries, came to the idea that excessive colonial liberty was the main factor behind the deterioration of ties between Britain and the Thirteen Colonies during the years of worsening relations.
Learn more about Loyalists here:
https://brainly.com/question/11559727
#SPJ2
Following the end of the Third Punic War, Carthage was made a Roman province
called Africa.
True
O False
describe a person who lives under the 10 commandments
Answer:
A good person like a loyal disciple or Jesus.
Which statements about Pericles’s General Assembly are correct? Select three options.
It was led by randomly selected males.
It consisted of all Athenian citizens.
It was led by elected officials.
It prepared laws for citizens.
It voted directly on laws.
The correct options are B,D and E. It consisted of all Athenian citizens. It prepared laws for citizens. It voted directly on laws are the statement about Pericles’s General Assembly which are correct ones.
The correct statements about Pericles's General Assembly are: 1. It consisted of all Athenian citizens: The General Assembly was open to all adult male citizens of Athens, regardless of social status or wealth.
This meant that all citizens had the opportunity to participate in the decision-making process.
2. It prepared laws for citizens: The General Assembly had the responsibility of drafting and proposing laws that would affect the citizens of Athens.
These laws were discussed and voted upon by the assembly before they were implemented.
3. It voted directly on laws: In the General Assembly, citizens had the power to directly vote on proposed laws.
This meant that there was a direct democratic process where citizens could express their opinions and shape the laws that governed their society.
It should be noted that the other options, such as "led by randomly selected males" and "led by elected officials," are not accurate statements about Pericles's General Assembly.
The General Assembly was not led by randomly selected males, but rather had elected officials who presided over the meetings and facilitated the discussions.
For more questions on Pericles’s General Assembly
https://brainly.com/question/8008
#SPJ8
Answer:
B, D, E
Explanation:
did it on edg
what 2 ways did the roman empire differ from the roman republic
Answer:
The Roman Republic was always an incredibly unequal system. Patricians, the elite, had special rights and powers for much of the Republic's existence. Other people living in Rome were divided between Plebs (free Roman citizens), non-citizens, who had further reduced rights, and slaves, who had no rights.
Explanation:
I hope this helped!
Answer:
Rome was empire long before it was imperial. however perhaps the key difference that modern viewers see between an imperial system and a republic is one of political participation and by extension legitimacy.the roman republic was based off a collection of documents that collectively acted as a constitution.
How did Northern interests present problems for the
Reconstruction efforts?
Answer:
The citizens in the North were growing tired of the Southern focus and wanted more attention paid to their own needs from government.
Explanation:
Why was the Gandhi irwin pact important
Answer:
Hello! It was signed before the second Round Table Conference in London on March 5, 1931. The pact ended the nonviolent civil disobedience movement (satyagraha) started by the Indian National Congress under the leadership of Gandhi with the Salt March leading to his arrest and imprisonment.
Explanation:
Hope this helps! :)-jade
During the 19th century, buffalo were hunted almost to extinction in western America, while the population of cattle grew substantially. During this period, however, people were killing and consuming far more cattle than buffalo. Present an explanation using the concepts learned in this course thus far to hypothesize why the buffalo population was declining but the cattle population was growing under these circumstances (no need to research the historical specifics; just apply the concepts from this course). Next, explain why the principle that describes the decline in the buffalo population also explains why many contemporary American cities have so much air pollution. How does the Coase Theorem help explain these outcomes? Explain.
In a market economy, cattle ownership was clearly defined, allowing efficient breeding, management, and protection. However, buffalo were considered a common resource with no clear ownership, leading to their decline. This tragedy of the commons resulted in air pollution in cities.
The Coase Theorem emphasizes the importance of transaction costs and negotiation to address externalities. This can be explained using the concept of market forces and property rights.
In a market economy, the ownership of cattle was clearly defined, with individuals or ranchers having property rights over their livestock. This allowed for the development of efficient systems for breeding, managing, and protecting cattle populations. The ownership of cattle created incentives for ranchers to invest in their care, resulting in a growing population.
On the other hand, buffalo were considered a common resource, with no clear ownership or property rights. This lack of ownership made it difficult for individuals to invest in the conservation and management of buffalo herds. Additionally, the market demand for buffalo meat and hides created an economic incentive for widespread hunting, leading to their decline.
The principle that describes the decline in the buffalo population also explains why many contemporary American cities have so much air pollution. This principle is known as the tragedy of the commons, which occurs when a common resource is overexploited due to the lack of clear property rights and individual incentives for conservation.
In the case of air pollution, the atmosphere is considered a common resource. Industries and individuals are not held accountable for the negative externalities they produce, such as pollution. Without clear property rights and the presence of market mechanisms, there is little incentive for reducing pollution levels.
The Coase Theorem helps explain these outcomes by highlighting the importance of transaction costs and negotiation in addressing the tragedy of the commons. According to the Coase Theorem, if property rights are clearly defined and transaction costs are low, individuals can negotiate and find mutually beneficial solutions to address externalities.
In the case of air pollution, the Coase Theorem suggests that if property rights over the atmosphere were clearly assigned and transaction costs were low, individuals and industries could negotiate agreements to reduce pollution. However, in practice, the high transaction costs, complexity of multiple polluters, and the difficulty in assigning property rights make it challenging to apply the Coase Theorem effectively in addressing air pollution issues.
Know more about market economy here:
https://brainly.com/question/30714952
#SPJ11
explain who was excluded from political discourse in the period from 1790-1815
During the period of 1790-1815, women, people of color, and people who did not own property were excluded from political discourse.
The right to vote was only extended to white men who owned property during this period. The exclusion of women was prevalent and the idea that women should not have access to political power was so deeply ingrained in society that women were not allowed to vote or run for public office. Women were often confined to domestic roles and considered inferior to men.
In the case of people of color, slavery was legal during this time, and African Americans and other people of color were viewed as property rather than citizens. Even in states where free black men were permitted to vote, they were still excluded from political discourse. In general, people who did not own property were also excluded from political discourse. The right to vote was limited to those who owned land or had other significant financial assets, which meant that poor and working-class people were often unable to participate in the political process.
learn more about 1790-1815 visit : brainly.com/question/13892223
#SPJ11
Compare the debate concerning arkansas statehood with earlier debate on missouri statehood.
Answer:
it appeared Michigan was about to apply for statehood, he knew that Arkansas needed to be in a position to apply as well in order to beat Florida to the opportunity of pairing with Michigan.
Explanation:
He was aware that Arkansas needed to be prepared to submit an application as well in order to beat Florida to the chance of partnering with Michigan since it seemed that Michigan was likely to seek statehood.
What was the controversy over Missouri's request for statehood?On August 10, 1821, Missouri became the twenty-fourth state. Missouri was proposed as a slave state in the statehood petition. Intense arguments were sparked by this request in the US Congress. Several people opposed allowing slavery in the portion of American soil west of the Mississippi River.
A statute known as the Missouri Compromise of 1820 attempted to alleviate escalating tensions between sections of society over the subject of slavery. The United States Congress recognized Maine as a free state and Missouri as a state that permitted slavery by enacting the legislation, which President James Monroe then signed. Well over 30 years would pass until the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 abolished the Missouri Compromise.
Learn more about Missouri statehood here:
https://brainly.com/question/1855671
#SPJ3
Bridgeman Images
The mosaic depicts the emperor and empress of the Byzantine Empire presenting the enthroned Jesus of
Nazareth with gifts.
Which two empires continued on cultural and/or political practices of the Byzantine Empire?
Select one:
O a. The Franks and Anglo-Saxons
b. Song and Yuan dynasties
c. Mamluks and the empire of Mali
d. Russians and the Ottomans
Answer:
C that should be it
Explanation:
How did the influenza pandemic affect American life?
From what you read about the aftermath of WWI, do you think that anything about the social, political, or economic atmosphere of the post-war period dictated the response or attitude toward the 1918 pandemic?
Pick 3 subjects from the subject page of the "Influenza Encyclopedia" to read about (such as, but not limited to, "face masks," "federal guidance," or "quarantine") . What seems familiar or different about the aspects of each of the subjects you chose?
Why is it important to delve into the history and impact of the 1918 pandemic?
The influenza pandemic of 1918 had a significant impact on American life, resulting in widespread illness, death, and social disruption. The aftermath of World War I influenced the response and attitude toward the pandemic, as the war's social, political, and economic atmosphere shaped the context in which the outbreak occurred. Exploring subjects such as face masks, federal guidance, and quarantine from the "Influenza Encyclopedia" provides insights into the measures taken during the pandemic.
The influenza pandemic of 1918 had a profound impact on American life, causing widespread illness, death, and disruption. The disease spread rapidly, overwhelming healthcare systems and leading to a staggering number of fatalities.
The response and attitude toward the pandemic were influenced by the social, political, and economic atmosphere of the post-World War I period. The war had left societies exhausted and in a state of upheaval, with concerns focused on rebuilding and recovery. This context may have affected the response to the pandemic, including issues such as resource allocation, public health infrastructure, and public perception of government interventions.
Exploring subjects from the "Influenza Encyclopedia" such as face masks, federal guidance, and quarantine provides insights into the measures implemented during the pandemic. Comparing these subjects to current times, some aspects may seem familiar, such as the use of face masks as a preventive measure, the role of federal guidance in coordinating responses, and the implementation of quarantine measures to contain the spread of the disease. However, there may also be differences in the specific strategies employed and the level of scientific understanding and medical advancements available today.
To learn more about outbreak
https://brainly.com/question/31453654
#SPJ11
What treaty ended the brief war with Mexico and what did Mexico give up in the treaty?
Answer:
The Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, by its terms, Mexico ceded 55 percent of its territory, including parts of present-day Arizona, California, New Mexico, Texas, Colorado, Nevada, and Utah, to the United States. Mexico relinquished all claims to Texas and recognized the Rio Grande as the southern boundary with the United States.
