hlo all here is your question in this question the chooses are below​

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]2^{1/2} - 2^{-1/3} = 2^{1/2 + 1/3} = 2^{3/6} = 2^{1/2} = \sqrt{2}[/tex]

Answer:

[tex]\sqrt[6]{2}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

2 ^ 1/2 ÷ 2 ^ 1/3

We know that a^b ÷ a^ c = a^(b-c)

2 ^ (1/2 -1/3)

2^ (3/6 - 2/6)

2 ^ 1/6

[tex]\sqrt[6]{2}[/tex]

Answer: Either 2, 5, or 8

This means the number 426 is divisible by 6. So are 456 and 486

===============================================================

Explanation:

A number is divisible by 6 if both of the following are true

This is simply because 6 = 2*3. So if 6 is a factor of a number, then 2 and 3 must be factors.

Therefore, 426 is a multiple of 6

Increment that middle digit 2 by 3 and we jump from 426 to 456. Those three digits add to a multiple of 3 as well (4+5+6 = 15). Following that line of logic, we go from 456 to 486 as the last possible three digit number that has these conditions of having 4 first and 6 last, and the number is a multiple of 6.

-------------------------------

In short,

The numbers 426 and 456 and 486 are all multiples of 6 since they are multiples of 2 and 3 at the same time.

So we could replace that middle digit with either 2, 5 or 8.

Answer: [tex]x\in (0,1)\cup (4,\infty)[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

In equality is [tex]x^3+4x>5x^2[/tex]

Taking terms one side

[tex]\Rightarrow x^3-5x^2+4x>0\\\Rightarrow x(x^2-5x+4)>0\\\Rightarrow x(x^2-4x-x+4)>0\\\Rightarrow x(x-4)(x-1)>0\\\Rightarrow (x-0)(x-1)(x-4)>0[/tex]

Using wavy curve method

[tex]x\in (0,1)\cup (4,\infty)[/tex]

Answer:

C) 20

Step-by-step explanation:

The absolute value of a number represents the positive distance between the number and zero. Absolute value is therefore always positive.

The distance between -20 and 0 is 20 and therefore the answer is C) 20.

Answer:

20

Step-by-step explanation:

Absolute value = | -20 |

= 20

Option C is correct .

Answer:

n>2 2/3

Draw a filled dot at a little more than 2 1/2 and continue the line to the right.

Step-by-step explanation:

Subtract 1/3 from both sides to get

2 2/3

Flip the inequality

n> 2 2/3

I hope this helps!

Answer:

0.7246 radians

Step-by-step explanation:

According to the Question,

Given that, a rectangle box has length 12 inches, width 15 inches, and a height of 17 inches

d = √{ (12)² +(15)² }  = √(144+225) = √369inches

 Tan∅ = 17/√369

Taking the [tex]Tan^{-1}[/tex] , we have

∅ = [tex]Tan^{-1}[/tex](17/√369) ≈ 0.7246 radians

Answer:

4r + 4(r + 3) = 68

r = 7 miles per hour

r + 3 = 10 miles per hour

Step-by-step explanation:

distance = rate * time

a)

4r + 4(r + 3) = 68

Distribute

4r + 4r + 12 = 68

8r + 12 = 68

8r = 56

r = 7 miles per hour

r + 3 = 10 miles per hour

Answer:

18

Step-by-step explanation:

1/3 of 27 is 9. 9 times 2 is 18.

Answer:

Take the picture you uploaded.

Click the rotate 'button' once.

Change the x to y and y to x on the graph. (axis labels)

Done

J (0, -1)

K(-4,-3)

I ( -4,-1)

The question is incomplete, complete version is written in the comment section below :

Answer:

Kindly check explanation

Step-by-step explanation:

1 / 4 (16 + 12x) = 28

Opening the bracket :

1/4 * 16 + 1/4 * 12x = 28

4 + 3x = 28

Subtract 4 from both sides :

4 + 3x - 4 = 28 - 4

3x = 24

Divide both sides by 3

3x / 3 = 24 / 3

x = 8

Step-by-step explanation:

We need to prove that ,

cot x / csc x - csc x / cot x = - tan x sec x .

LHS :-

> cot x / csc x - csc x / cot x

> cos x / sin x ÷ csc x - sin x × csc x / cos x

> cosx - 1/ cos x

> cos² x - 1 / cos x

> - sin²x / cosx

> -sin x / cos x × sin x

> -tan x sin x

= RHS

Hence Proved !

Answer:

-18

Step-by-step explanation:

B=-6 C=2 P.E.M.D.A.S.

b - 6(c)

-6 - 6(2)

-6 - 12 . The negatives cancel out, adding each other

-6 + -12

= -18 :)

Answer:

b - 6c

= -6 - 6x2

= -6 x( 1+2)

= -6x3

= -18

Step-by-step explanation:

we cannot see the diagram, so we don't know how many layers of bricks are used. and therefore it is impossible to tell the height of the wall.

Answer: 5

Step-by-step explanation: I think it is 5

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

If the triangles given in the picture are similar,

ΔVUT ~ ΔVLM

By the property of similarity of two triangles, their corresponding sides will be proportional.

[tex]\frac{TV}{VM}= \frac{VL}{VU}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{49}{14}=\frac{28}{8}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{7}{2}=\frac{7}{2}[/tex]

True.

Therefore, ΔVUT and ΔVLM will be similar.

Answer:

Quadratic formula

Step-by-step explanation:

The function is quadratic because it is a parabola. Exponential functions shoot either upwards or downwards rapidly, and it is clearly not linear due to it's curve. It also isn't piecewise because the function never stops or starts irregularly.

Answer:

should be (5y-2)y = 72

Step-by-step explanation:

since the product of the two is 72, it's true that xy = 72. and it is also true that x is equal to five times y minus 2, so you can rewrite x as 5y-2. plug that in for x in the first equation, and you're set. hope this helps :)

In other words, choices B and C are the non-answers while everything else is an answer.

==============================================================

Explanation:

Let p represent the probability of an event. The value of p must be between 0 and 1, inclusive of both endpoints. Symbolically, we can write [tex]0 \le p \le 1[/tex]

In other words, p = 0 is the smallest it can get and p = 1 is the largest it can get, or it could be anything in between.

The probability p = 0 means that the event will never happen, or there's 0% of it happening. The probability p = 1 means there's 100% certainty the event will happen.

Something like p = 1.4 is not possible as this indicates it's over 100%. So that rules out choice B. Choice C is also ruled out because we can't have negative probabilities.

This is the answer.

Hope it helps!!

Answer:

[tex]120.\sqrt{2}.\sqrt[3]{3}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]\sqrt{32} = \sqrt{16.2} =\sqrt{4^{2}.2} = 4\sqrt{2}[/tex]

[tex]\sqrt[3]{81} =\sqrt[3]{27.3} =\sqrt[3]{3^{3}.3 }=3\sqrt[3]{3}[/tex]

∴[tex]5\sqrt{32}.2\sqrt[3]{81} =5. [4\sqrt{2}].2.[3\sqrt[3]{3} ][/tex]

                   [tex]=120.\sqrt{2}.\sqrt[3]{3}[/tex]

Answer:

y= -2/3x+6

Step-by-step explanation:

Using slope intercept form

y = mx+b where m is the slope and b is the y intercept

y = -2/3x +b

Substitute the point into the equation

8 = -2/3(-3) +b

8 = 2+b

8-2 =b

6=b

y= -2/3x+6

Answer:

0.0524 = 5.24% probability that the sample mean would differ from the population mean by more than 2 millimeters.

Step-by-step explanation:

To solve this question, we need to understand the normal probability distribution and the central limit theorem.

Normal Probability Distribution

Problems of normal distributions can be solved using the z-score formula.

In a set with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex], the z-score of a measure X is given by:

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

The Z-score measures how many standard deviations the measure is from the mean. After finding the Z-score, we look at the z-score table and find the p-value associated with this z-score. This p-value is the probability that the value of the measure is smaller than X, that is, the percentile of X. Subtracting 1 by the p-value, we get the probability that the value of the measure is greater than X.

Central Limit Theorem

The Central Limit Theorem establishes that, for a normally distributed random variable X, with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex], the sampling distribution of the sample means with size n can be approximated to a normal distribution with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]s = \frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}[/tex].

For a skewed variable, the Central Limit Theorem can also be applied, as long as n is at least 30.

Mean diameter of 144 millimeters, and a variance of 49.

This means that [tex]\mu = 144, \sigma = \sqrt{49} = 7[/tex]

Sample of 46:

This means that [tex]n = 46, s = \frac{7}{\sqrt{46}}[/tex]

Wat is the probability that the sample mean would differ from the population mean by more than 2 millimeters?

Above 144 + 2 = 146 or below 144 - 2 = 142. Since the normal distribution is symmetric, these probabilities are equal, which means that we find one of them and multiply by two.

Probability the sample mean is below 142:

p-value of Z when X = 142, so:

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

By the Central Limit Theorem

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{s}[/tex]

[tex]Z = \frac{142 - 144}{\frac{7}{\sqrt{46}}}[/tex]

[tex]Z = -1.94[/tex]

[tex]Z = -1.94[/tex] has a p-value of 0.0262

2*0.0262 = 0.0524

0.0524 = 5.24% probability that the sample mean would differ from the population mean by more than 2 millimeters.

Answer:

0.1587

Step-by-step explanation:

Applying,

P(μ>40) = P(μ-(x-μ)/σ)............. Equation 1

Where P(μ>40) =  probability of the age of the random subscriber more than 40 years   μ = mean, σ = standard deviation, x = random subscriber

From the question,

Given: μ = 35 years, σ = 5 years, x = 40 years.

Therefore,

P(μ>40) = P(35-(40-35)/5) = P(35-(5/5)

P(μ>40) = 1-φ(1)

From the norminal probabilty table,

P(μ>40) = 1-0.8413

P(μ>40) = 0.1587

Answer:

Just A and C

Step-by-step explanation:

B doesn't count because you would not be looking at the 9. Only the 4.

You only look at one number to the right.

Answer:

A and C are correct, but not B

Step-by-step explanation:

When you round, you only look at the number behind the place you are rounding.

6.04 doesn't round to 6.1, so that is not correct

Answer:

Z = 50

Step-by-step explanation:

Given the following data;

Z = 187

x = 64

y = 6

Translating the word problem into an algebraic expression, we have;

Z = k√x/y

First of all, we would find the constant of proportionality, k;

187 = k√64/6

187 * 6 = k√64

1122 = 8k

k = 1122/8

k = 140.25

To find z, when x and y = 9

Z = 140.25√9/9

Z = (140.25 * 3)/9

Z = 420.75/9

Z = 46.75 ≈ 50

Note: The values in the latter part of the question isn't explicitly stated, so I assumed a value of 9 for both x and y.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

a.) it's just mean, variance

so here it's just 12,6.25

b.) For the x bar thing just divide the variance by the number of people (mean stay the same)

the variance is then (2.5²/34)= .1838

which makes it (12,.1838)

c.) here we don't use x bar (and so it's normal (12,2.5²))

p(11.6) = (11.6-12)/(2.5)= -.16 = .4364

p(12.4)= (12.4-12)/2.5 = .16= .5636

.5636-.4364= .1272

d.) here we use x bar because it's asking for an average so it's normal (12, .1838)

same deal

p(11.6)=(11.6-12)/√.1838= -.93295= .1762

p(12.4)= (12.4-12)/√.1838= .93295= .8238

.8238-.1762= .6476

d.) no because they're probably IID

f.) It's average so here we use x bar

q1 is just the 25th percentile

the 25th percentile is -.6745

-.6745=(x-12)/(√.1838)= 11.711

q3 is the 75th percentile

.6745=(x-12)/√.1838

x=12.289

The interquartile range is just the difference between the two

12.289-11.711= .5784

Answer:

The answer is 1/8

Answer:

The value of teh test statistic is [tex]z = 5.54[/tex]

The p-value of the test is 0 < 0.05, which means that there is significant evidence to conclude that the proportion differs from 0.2.

Step-by-step explanation:

The test statistic is:

[tex]z = \frac{X - \mu}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}}[/tex]

In which X is the sample mean, [tex]\mu[/tex] is the value tested at the null hypothesis, [tex]\sigma[/tex] is the standard deviation and n is the size of the sample.

0.2 is tested at the null hypothesis:

This means that [tex]\mu = 0.2, \sigma = \sqrt{0.2*0.8} = 0.4[/tex]

Using the sample results p^=0.27 with n=1003

This means that [tex]X = 0.27, n = 1003[/tex]

Value of the test statistic:

[tex]z = \frac{X - \mu}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}}[/tex]

[tex]z = \frac{0.27 - 0.2}{\frac{0.4}{\sqrt{1003}}}[/tex]

[tex]z = 5.54[/tex]

P-value of the test and decision:

The p-value of the test is the probability that the sample proportion differs from 0.2 by at least 0.07, which is P(|z| > 5.54), that is, 2 multiplied by the p-value of z = -5.54.

Looking at the z-table, z = -5.54 has a p-value of 0.

2*0 = 0.

The p-value of the test is 0 < 0.05, which means that there is significant evidence to conclude that the proportion differs from 0.2.