Answer:
i think its A ( not sure )
Explanation:
Which type of context is the writer in this scenario most directly concerned
with?
Becca must write the step-by-step procedures for
undocking a yacht, but the terminology is hard to explain to
people who have never sailed a day in their lives.
O A. Audience
B. Organization
O C. Purpose
O D. Genre
Answer:
A. Audience
Explanation:
How the prompt goes in detail about how people who have never sailed won't understand is the pointer to the writer caring about the audience.
The type of context with which the writer is most directly concerned with in this scenario is audience.
What is context in writing?
"Context is the setting within which a work of writing is situated. Context provides meaning and clarity to the intended message."
The type of context with which the writer is most directly concerned with in this scenario is audience because the when the text is written keeping in mind the targeted audience it comes under context related to audience. Thus, the writer is concerned with "specified group of potential readers most likely to come into contact with" Becca's essay that is the audience "who have never sailed a day in their lives". He is concerned whether they will be able to understand the difficult terminology used by Becca.
To learn more about context here
https://brainly.com/question/26324657
#SPJ2
What's the difference between Murder and killer?
Answer:
Murder is a proverb of killer
Explanation:
Answer:
A murder is the unlawful killing of another human being by another. A killer is a person or thing that kills.
summary of oliver twist in 100 words
Answer:
Explanation:
Oliver twist is a story of a nine year old boy named Oliver. Oliver has to face hardships of life at a young age.He had to work at a factory and starve as he is not given enough food.He runs away from there and meets Nancy.She knows about Oliver's stepbrother Monk.But Monks does not want to accept Oliver as his brother because he does not want to share his property.Monk attacks Oliver but Oliver is saved.Later it is shown that Oliver loves with a kind gentleman in a village, far away from the world of lies
In 5–7 complete sentences, summarize your Module One short story. Give specific details about the exposition, rising action, climax, falling action, and resolution. Your response should address each element of plot. The story is Rules of the Game.
Answer:
The exposition of the story is when we learn about Waverly Place Jong, where she lives, and her relationship with her family.
The rising action is Waverly's progression of learning about the game of Chess and her success in that game, including the win at the tournament.
The climax of this story that tells of the conflict between a Chinese immigrant to America and her daughter comes at the end as, in a dream, Waverley faces her mother in a mystery and magical game of chess and loses.
The falling action is when Waverly decides there is nowhere else to go and she decides to go home.
The resolution is when Waverly gets home and realizes that her mom is beating her in a game of chess that is in her mind and she is pondering her next move.
Explanation:
Nights and Dragons— From the memoir of author Abigail Prynne 1 I sit at my desk listening to thunder growl outside my window. Flashes of light burst through the darkness, and wind races past my window. The thrilling combination of sight and sound conjures up visions of dragons roaring proudly, breathing fire, and soaring across the midnight sky. Dragons first fascinated me when I was a little girl. They have followed me ever since. The magnificent creatures appeared in storybooks I read in the library, paintings I saw in museums, movies I watched in the theater, and the dreams I had in my sleep. By the time I was thirteen, one question consumed me. I wanted to know if dragons ever existed, so I set out on a quest for facts. 2 As I started my research, I discovered many skeptics. Scientists presented evidence to show why dragons could not—and did not—exist. They explained that it would be impossible for dragons to fly because they would be too big. They laughed at the idea of dragons breathing fire. They pointed out that no other animal has ever done this. They said that if dragons had lived, someone would have found remains somewhere in the world. No bones about it, there were plenty of logical explanations. It would have been easy for me to accept that the only place dragons ever existed was in the imaginations of those who believed. 3 I could have given up, but I thought about my grandmother. She always told me that "people who believe that science is the answer to everything are missing out on everything else." With her words in mind, I searched some more. There were many facts that hinted that dragons may not be fictional. I noticed that cultures across the world all described dragons in similar ways. This was odd because they had no way to communicate with each other. I found dragons mentioned in more than just stories. They appeared in old legal papers, in the travel logs of Marco Polo, and in the Bible. I saw that the Chinese calendar uses a different animal each year. Dragons are included along with eleven real animals. I began to believe it was a real possibility that all of these people were talking about a creature that actually existed. 4 With renewed hope that there was some truth to the legends, I looked for new research. I found that some experts disagreed with popular arguments against dragons. They suggested that a dragon could have four stomachs like a cow. If it created stomach gases like birds, it might create enough to lift itself off the ground. This would give it the ability to fly. If it forced out air when diving toward the earth, it might release gases which could ignite into flame. When the animal died, the stomachs would release strong acids that would dissolve its dead body over time. Biologists backed up these ideas with sketches and models based on known animals. Not everyone agreed with these ideas, but many of the things we accept about dinosaurs and other extinct species started the same way. 5 I doubt we will ever truly know whether dragons existed. There may always be two sides to the fiery debate. Some will say the stories come from active imaginations. Some will believe with all their hearts that the legendary creatures roamed our ancient world. I don't know for certain which side to believe, but the sound and fury of a night like this makes me smile. It rekindles my childhood dreams and keeps the exciting possibility alive. Which sentence from paragraph 4 makes an explicit statement without offering any implicit suggestions? With renewed hope that there was some truth to the legends, I looked for new research. If it created stomach gases like birds, it might create enough to lift itself off the ground. Biologists backed up these ideas with sketches and models based on known animals.
Answer:
1The main idea would be "Scientists have lots of evidence to explain why dragons don't exist."
2. Emphasized by the evidence and word choice related to scientific evidence
3. The main idea would be "I have always wondered if dragons existed, and I hope they did."
4. Displayed through the author's nature of questioning and evaluating different kinds of evidence and ideas.
:)
'Winning isn't everything, its the only thing' pls gimme at least 5 points FOR the topic thank u : )
Answer:
Hey There!! Why is winning is not Important? Because people always think that winning is good. But, winning can be good. But people don't understand that when you lose you should be proud of yourself what you had done. And, you might think that loseing is bad. But, loseing actually teach us something that it okay to lose sometimes. But, next time try better!
Hope It Helped!~ ♡
ItsNobody~ ☆
Hey There!!
Why Winning isn't everything, its the only thing? Actually winning not everything because everybody learn from they mistakes, Because usually I thought winning important. But, I realize that you can win and also lose at the same. Nobody isn't perfect but that's some people are. I'm not perfect as well but I have learn from that mistake. Have a great day!!~
By ☆~Itsbrazts☆~
figurative language can involve comparing two things. Use what you’ve learned to create your own comparisons. Write a simile or metaphor that describes any item in the following list: eyes trees rose time sea
Which sentence best reveals the purpose of the speech in the excerpt from Franklin D. Roosevelt's "First Inaugural Address"?
Answer:
I have a few different ideas, is one of these right?
Explanation:
I am certain that my fellow Americans expect that on my induction into the Presidency I will address them with a candor and a decision which the present situation of our Nation impels. This is preeminently the time to speak the truth, the whole truth, frankly and boldly. Nor need we shrink from honestly facing conditions in our country today. This great Nation will endure as it has endured, will revive and will prosper. So, first of all, let me assert my firm belief that the only thing we have to fear is fear itself—nameless, unreasoning, unjustified terror which paralyzes needed efforts to convert retreat into advance. In every dark hour of our national life a leadership of frankness and vigor has met with that understanding and support of the people themselves which is essential to victory. I am convinced that you will again give that support to leadership in these critical days.
Answer:
I am convinced that you will again give that support to leadership in these critical days.
Explanation:
n at least one hundred words, explain how Shirley Jackson uses symbolism to express a theme in her short story “The Lottery.” Use evidence from the story to support your answer.
Answer:
u have to show me the story to answer your question
Ch. 13 Trojan war How does the morality of the gods compare to that of the mortals? responses should be between 150-750 words. Choose just ONE of the following questions to answer:
Answer:
The legend of “Judgment of Paris” was believed to have started the Trojan War because the award for Paris of Troy would be the most beautiful woman, Helene, wife of the king Meleanus.
The legend begins at the celebration of the marriage of Peleus and Thetis (parents of Achilles), to which goddess Eris wasn’t invited. This was a great offence to Eris, so she decided to get her revenge by dividing gods with simple beauty contest. This beauty contest was true representation of the pride and narcissism of the goddesses. Eris brought one apple and said that only the fairest one. The goddesses who claimed this apple were Athena, Aphrodite and Hera. Because Zeus couldn’t decide, they decided that Paris of Troy should be the one to judge the contest. Hera offered to make him king of Europe and Asia, Athena offered wisdom and skill in war, and Aphrodite offered the world's most beautiful woman – Helen, wife of the king Meleanus. Paris accepted the Aphrodite’s offer. Paris has received Helen, but he also received the enmity of other gods, especially Athena and Hera. After this, king Meleanus began the war to retrieve his wife, which resulted in seven years of Trojan War. There is the brief allusion to the “Judgment of Paris” in the Iliad in lines 24.25–30.
Explanation:
(1) One morning, when Gregor Samsa woke from troubled dreams, he found himself transformed in his bed into a horrible vermin. He lay on his armour-like back, and if he lifted his head a little he could see his brown belly, slightly domed and divided by arches into stiff sections. The bedding was hardly able to cover it and seemed ready to slide off any moment. His many legs, pitifully thin compared with the size of the rest of him, waved about helplessly as he looked. (2) "What's happened to me?" he thought. It wasn't a dream. His room, a proper human room although a little too small, lay peacefully between its four familiar walls. A collection of textile samples lay spread out on the table—Samsa was a travelling salesman—and above it there hung a picture that he had recently cut out of an illustrated magazine and housed in a nice, gilded frame. It showed a lady fitted out with a fur hat and fur boa who sat upright, raising a heavy fur muff that covered the whole of her lower arm towards the viewer. (3) Gregor then turned to look out the window at the dull weather. Drops of rain could be heard hitting the pane, which made him feel quite sad. "How about if I sleep a little bit longer and forget all this nonsense," he thought, but that was something he was unable to do because he was used to sleeping on his right, and in his present state couldn't get into that position. However hard he threw himself onto his right, he always rolled back to where he was. He must have tried it a hundred times, shut his eyes so that he wouldn't have to look at the floundering legs, and only stopped when he began to feel a mild, dull pain there that he had never felt before. Read the sentence from the passage and answer the question that follows: His room, a proper human room although a little too small, lay peacefully between its four familiar walls. The purpose of this sentence in the second paragraph is to show that Gregor is not dreaming reveal Gregor as an untidy individual uncover that Gregor has a girlfriend expose Gregor's hatred for his job
Answer: The purpose of this sentence in the second paragraph is to show that Gregor is not dreaming.
Explanation: Gregor recognizes that this is his own room with his own belongings.
Answer:
In Paragraph 2, it shows that Gregor Samsa, is not dreaming.
Explanation:
Gregor recognizes that this is his own room with his own belongings. but that there is someone else (the vermin) in his bed.
Carson's first chapter explains the title of her book. Why is it called Silent Spring?
In Shakespeare's Hamlet, the character Hamlet reveals in a monologue that he is pretending to be mad. Concerned, the King and the Queen try to find out the reason behind Hamlet's unusual mood. The court adviser, Polonius, tries to help them by promising the King that he will find out the reason for Hamlet's behavior. Meanwhile, the other characters Gertrude, Claudius, and Ophelia try to cheer up Hamlet in their own way. Which description is an example of dramatic irony?
Answer:
Only the audience knows that Hamlet is just acting like he is mad.
Explanation:
Ok so basically what is happening here is that Hamlet is pretending to be mad. The King and Queen are trying to find out why Hamlet is so mad, because he doesn't usually act this way. The court adviser, Polonius, promises to the King that he will find out why Hamlet is mad. Gertrude, Claudius, and Ophelia are trying to "snap Hamlet out of being mad."
Dramatic Irony means: the expression of one's meaning by using language that normally signifies the opposite, typically for humorous or emphatic effect.
(B i n g)
Basically he is pretending to be mad and usually he's not.
From what I know, why he is doing this is unknown, but I think he is doing this for a "humorous effect" or just to be like, annoying or weird.
The part; "In Shakespeare's Hamlet, the character Hamlet reveals in a monologue that he is pretending to be mad. Concerned, the King and the Queen try to find out the reason behind Hamlet's unusual mood," shows that Hamlet is *pretending* to be mad, when he is usually not.
♡ I hope this helped! ♡
❀ 0ranges ❀
“United States v. Susan B. Anthony: Justice Ward Hunt's Court Ruling:” Which of these inferences about voting laws is best supported by the following text? “The amendment, however, does not contain that word. It is limited to race, color, or previous condition of servitude. The legislature of the state of New York has seen fit to say, that the franchise of voting shall be limited to the male sex. In saying this, there is, in my judgment, no violation of the letter, or of the spirit, of the fourteenth or of the fifteenth amendment.” Question 46 options: a) The rules dictating who gets to vote in federal elections are completely separate from who gets to vote in state elections. b) It would have been illegal for Anthony to vote in a state assembly election as well because of her sex. c) The United States missed a big opportunity by not including women in the fifteenth amendment. d) Anthony could legally be elected to Congress even though she is not permitted to vote in a congressional election.
Answer:
b
Explanation:
i know the answer
The implication of the case "United States v. Susan B. Anthony: Justice Ward Hunt's Court Ruling" is best supported by the text stated in option (d): "Anthony could legally be elected to Congress even though she is not permitted to vote in a congressional election."
What inference supports the case?This is the assertion that is utilized to draw a conclusion about a certain thing based on the data at hand.
As a result, it is clear from the court case between Susan Anthony and the American government that Antony's defense claimed that the legalization of voting for all people was founded on the fact that women could become lawyers.
Therefore, Anthony thought that the legalization of women's suffrage in Illinois meant that everyone was now free to vote in all states. As a result, from the given options, the last option, that is option (d) is the correct answer.
Check the link to learn about United States v. Susan B. Anthony;
https://brainly.com/question/17160303
#SPJ2