Note that Howard cheats in his calculus class, even though he knows it is wrong, because "everyone else is doing it. Kohlberg would argue that Howard's response reflects a stage in moral development known as the "conventional level," where individuals base their actions on what is socially acceptable and conform to the expectations of their peers.
What is Morality?Morality is the distinction of right intentions, decisions, and acts from incorrect intentions, decisions, and actions.
Morals are a set of ideas that are taught rather than emerging from the inside and are emotionally tied to judging right or wrong. When a person is being judged, morals have greater social significance and approval than values.
Learn more about Morality:
https://brainly.com/question/27461226
#SPJ1
Greywater-water from showers and dishwashing- maintains a relatively constant temperature of 32.5 degrees Celsius. as it exits a building, before it enters sewage lines. As a result, greywater thermal capture systems have a great potential for energy conservation. Heat exchange units can be integrated into plumbing systems to draw heat energy from greywater. Discuss and explain the possible advantages of using greywater heat exchange systems in a college dormitory-other than energy conservation.
The advantage of using greywater heat exchange systems lessens the amount of hot water you use, which will lower your energy costs and carbon footprint.
What is a greywater system?By using the heat from wastewater, the greywater heat recovery system enables the preheating of cold water.
It transfers to cold water from the water system or from the well the heat of the running water during a shower, which is often lost in the drains. It will conserve electricity bills in college.
Therefore, the benefit of employing greywater heat exchange systems is that you will use less hot water, which will result in lower energy bills and a smaller carbon footprint.
To learn more about the greywater system, visit here:
https://brainly.com/question/27325210
#SPJ1
PLEASE HELP!! 30 points!
2. James Obergefell and John Arthur, two residents of Ohio, married in Maryland in 2013. When they returned to Ohio, however, the state refused to recognize marriage between same-sex couples because of the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act. The two men filed a lawsuit against Ohio's ban on same-sex marriage. The Obergefell case was combined with several similar cases before it was appealed to the Supreme Court as Obergefell v. Hodges. Ohio's director of health, Richard Hodges, was the lead defendant.
In a 5-to-4 decision, the Supreme Court overturned all state bans against same-sex marriage. In his majority opinion, Anthony M. Kennedy argued that marriage is a fundamental right for all people. To ban same-sex marriage, he explained, was to deny a group of Americans equal protection under the law. In his dissenting opinion, John G. Roberts argued that the legality of same-sex marriage was not a constitutional issue and should therefore be left to individual states to decide.
Write a response to each of the following:
A description of which part of the U.S. Constitution was central to both this case, Obergefell v. Hodges (2015), and the earlier case of Brown v. Board of Education (1954)
An explanation of at least one major difference between the cases, as it relates to the Constitution
An explanation, based on your understanding of the Constitution or of history, of why the Brown decision was unanimous and why the Obergefell decision was almost evenly split, despite the similarities between the two cases
Answer:
Explanation:
The Obergefell v. Hodges case illustrates the principle of judicial review because the Supreme Court overturned a court of appeals ruling on constitutional grounds. In this case, the same-sex couples argued that the state laws banning same-sex marriage or refusing to recognize same-sex marriages from other states violated the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Supreme Court reviewed the case and ruled in favor of the couples, finding that the state laws denied the couples their Fourteenth Amendment rights. The Supreme Court's decision was based on a interpretation of the Constitution and not on public opinion or the actions of other states.
A. Both the Obergefell v. Hodges (2015) and Brown v. Board of Education (1954) cases were central to the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. The 14th Amendment guarantees equal protection under the law to all citizens. In both cases, the plaintiffs argued that the state laws in question violated their constitutional rights to equal protection.
B. One major difference between the cases is the scope of the laws being challenged. The Brown case challenged segregation in public schools, while the Obergefell case challenged state bans on same-sex marriage. Additionally, the Brown case had a clearer historical precedent in the form of the Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) decision, which established the "separate but equal" doctrine. There was no such precedent for the issue of same-sex marriage.
C. The Brown decision was unanimous because the issue of segregation in public schools had a long history of being considered morally and ethically wrong, as well as being clearly discriminatory. The Obergefell decision was almost evenly split because the issue of same-sex marriage was a much more recent and controversial development in American society. There was a great deal of disagreement and lack of consensus on the issue, which is reflected in the split decision. Additionally, the interpretation of the 14th Amendment's guarantee of equal protection has been a contentious issue throughout American history, with some justices taking a more narrow view of the amendment and others taking a broader view. This difference in interpretation likely played a role in the split decision in the Obergefell case.
PLEASE HELP!! 30 points!!
2. Examine the data and then respond to questions A, B, and C:
The data is attached.
Draw a single conclusion that is supported by all three graphs. What are the data most clearly trying to show? Explain your answer.
Explain how the data shed light on the idea that the Supreme Court is sometimes "liberal" and sometimes "conservative." What context does the data give this notion that is not otherwise obvious? Support your explanation.
Draw a conclusion about judicial activism or judicial restraint that is supported by the data shown. Explain the connection between the data and your conclusion.
By definition, judicial activism refers to a justice's method of conducting judicial review, in which the justice foregoes the duty of interpreting the Constitution in favor of making decisions that advance the activist's chosen policies.
What constitutes a courtroom activist? By definition, judicial activism refers to a justice's method of conducting judicial review, in which the justice foregoes the duty of interpreting the Constitution in favor of making decisions that advance the activist's chosen policies.One of the most prominent instances of judicial activism in American history is widely regarded to be the Roe v. Wade ruling, which held that laws prohibiting abortion were unconstitutional because they violated a person's right to privacy.Judicial activism's primary traits are:using a broad interpretation of the Constitution.Judges are less prone to rely on precedent when ruling in opposition to previous interpretations of the Constitution.Injunctions against legislative or executive actions are more likely to be granted by the courts.To learn more about judicial activism refer
https://brainly.com/question/3711403
#SPJ1
AP Statistics question!
The expected difference in GPA is 1.4, and the standard deviation of the differences is 0.41.
What would be the effect on the above parameters?Expected difference in GPA: 1.4Standard deviation of the differences: 0.5If the art department lowered its grades by 10% and the mathematics department increased its grades by 1 quality point each, the expected difference in GPA would decrease to 0.4 and the standard deviation of the differences would increase to 0.6.Expected Difference: 0.4Standard Deviation: 0.4By lowering the art department's grades by 10%, the expected difference in GPA between the art and mathematics classes will decrease by 0.1. The standard deviation of the differences between the two classes will also decrease by 0.1. This is because the art GPA has a lower average, so when the grades are lowered, the difference between the two classes is more likely to be lower than the previous value. On the other hand, increasing the mathematics department's grades by 1 quality point will increase the expected difference in GPA by 0.1 and the standard deviation of the differences between the two classes by 0.1. This is because the mathematics GPA has a higher average, so when the grades are increased, the difference between the two classes is more likely to be higher than the previous value. Overall, the change in grades will cause a slight decrease in the expected difference in GPA and a slight increase in the standard deviation of the differences between the two classes.To learn more about Simpson's paradox refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/28169268
#SPJ1
Answer:
A
tyler has a points card for a movie theater.
he receives 75 rewards points just for signing up.
• he earns 10.5 points for each visit to the movie theater.
he needs 180 points for a free movie ticket.
.
a
how many visits must tyler make to earn a free movie ticket?
Explanation:
Compare and Contrast the Moon and the moons of other planets
Answer: The Moon of the Earth has some similarities, but also lot of differences with the other natural satellites in the Solar system.
The Moon is rocky, covered with dust, has lot of craters from asteroids and meteorites. Most of the planets in the solar system are actually gassy, frozen, and the craters tend to be very rare.
Compared to the planet around which it spins, the Earth, the Moon is actually very large, even though it is nowhere as large as some other moons in the Solar System. All the other moons tend to be much smaller in comparison the the planets around which they spin.
The Moon also has very low gravitational pull and very small mass for its size, and the reason for that is still not clear. All the other moons have gravitational pulls and masses that are expected by their size.
Describe the evolution of the presidency during the federalist
Answer:
During the Federalist era, the presidency evolved from a largely ceremonial role to a more powerful and active position, as Presidents George Washington and John Adams set precedents for the use of executive power and established the office as a key player in the federal government. The Federalist Party also played an important role in shaping the presidency during this time by advocating for a strong central government and expanding the powers of the executive branch.
How effective were the domestic policies of Washington and Hamilton
The domestic policies of George Washington and Alexander Hamilton, the first two Presidents of the United States, were generally considered to be effective in stabilizing the new nation and laying the foundations for future economic growth.
During Washington's presidency, Hamilton, as the first Secretary of Treasury, developed a series of economic policies aimed at addressing the country's financial problems. These policies included the establishment of a national bank, the creation of a stable currency, and the assumption of state debt by the federal government. These policies helped to establish a stable financial system and put the country on a sound footing for future economic growth.
Hamilton also proposed the creation of a national manufacturing and infrastructure development program, which was intended to promote economic growth, increase employment and reduce dependence on foreign goods.
What is the domestic policies about?Washington's presidency, on the other hand, was marked by his Farewell Address, where he warned against the dangers of political parties and urged unity among Americans. He also established the principle of civilian control over the military, which helped to ensure the stability of the new government.
In summary, the domestic policies of Washington and Hamilton were effective in laying the foundations for future economic growth and stabilizing the new nation. Their policies helped establish a stable financial system, promoted economic growth, and ensured the stability of the new government.
Learn more about domestic policies from
https://brainly.com/question/12772216
#SPJ1
Identify the stages of the demographic transition model where you expect to find countries with a
high elderly dependency ratio.
Note that Countries with a high elderly reliance ratio are often seen in the later phases of the demographic transition model, notably Stages 4 and 5. Birth rates have fallen and the population is aging in these phases, resulting in an increase in the number of old people relative to the working-age population. As a result, the elderly dependence ratio is larger, indicating that the working-age population bears a bigger burden in supporting the old.
What is a high elderly dependency ratio?A high dependence ratio suggests that the economically active population and the entire economy have a disproportionate burden in supporting and providing social services to youngsters and the elderly, who are frequently economically dependent.
The age dependence ratio expresses the connection between three age groups within a population: those aged 0 to 15, those aged 16 to 64, and those aged 65 and higher. Higher numbers suggest that the population has a higher level of age-related reliance.
Learn more about the high elderly dependency ratio:
https://brainly.com/question/28844325
#SPJ1
PLEASE HELP!! I need sources and argument points!!
Write an essay in which you argue that media do or do not do a sufficient job of educating voters during electoral campaigns. Support your argument with evidence from researched sources. You can start your research by following the links on the assignment page or consulting The Lanahan Readings, but expand your search to other sources as necessary.
As you research and formulate your response, ask yourself these questions:
What kinds of information should a voter have before going to the polls?
Whose responsibility is it to provide this information?
What seems to be the primary focus of media campaign coverage?
In what ways do political candidates seek to manipulate the media? How successful are they?
How do social media differ from traditional mass media in their influence over voters?
How might the media's portrayal of elections as a form of entertainment influence the type of information voters receive?
How might bias, partisanship, and the commercial nature of media affect the type of information reported?
How might media improve coverage of campaigns?
Answer:
The role of media in educating voters during electoral campaigns is a topic of ongoing debate. Some argue that media do not provide sufficient information for voters to make informed decisions, while others argue that media play an important role in providing information to voters.
One important aspect of media coverage of elections is the provision of information about the candidates and their positions on key issues. A voter should have access to this information before going to the polls in order to make an informed decision. However, research has shown that media coverage of elections often focuses more on the horse race aspect of the campaign and less on the issues. This can be problematic, as it means that voters may not have access to the information they need to make an informed decision.
Whose responsibility is it to provide this information? It is generally seen as the media's responsibility to inform the public and provide voters with the information they need to make informed decisions. However, political candidates also have a responsibility to provide information about their positions and qualifications. Additionally, third-party organizations, such as fact-checking websites, can play a role in providing information to voters.
Political candidates often seek to manipulate the media in order to gain an advantage in the campaign. This can take the form of controlling access to information, shaping the narrative of the campaign, and controlling the timing of announcements. Research has shown that candidates are often successful in manipulating the media to their advantage.
Social media has changed the landscape of media coverage of elections. Social media platforms have the ability to reach large numbers of people quickly, and have the potential to shape public opinion. However, research has also shown that social media can be a source of misinformation, which can be problematic for voters trying to make informed decisions.
The media's portrayal of elections as a form of entertainment can also influence the type of information that voters receive. This can lead to a focus on sensational stories and a lack of coverage of important issues. Additionally, bias, partisanship, and the commercial nature of media can affect the type of information reported. This can lead to a lack of balance in coverage, which can be problematic for voters trying to make informed decisions.
To improve coverage of campaigns, media can focus on providing more in-depth coverage of the candidates and their positions on key issues. Additionally, media can work to provide balanced coverage and to combat the spread of misinformation. Fact-checking websites can be an important resource for providing accurate information to voters. Furthermore, media can also be more transparent about their funding and affiliations, which can help to reduce bias and increase trust in media.
In conclusion, media plays a crucial role in educating voters during electoral campaigns. However, research has shown that media coverage of elections often focuses more on the horse race aspect of the campaign and less on the issues. Additionally, political candidates often seek to manipulate the media in order to gain an advantage in the campaign. Social media has changed the landscape of media coverage of elections but can also be a source of misinformation. To improve coverage of campaigns, media can focus on providing more in-depth coverage of the candidates and their positions on key issues, providing balanced coverage, and combating the spread of misinformation.
A. Briefly describe ONE important similarity between Imperialists and Anti-Imperialists regarding expansion during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries.
B. Briefly describe ONE important difference between Imperialists and Anti-Imperialists regarding expansion during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries.
C. Briefly explain ONE piece of evidence that reflects Anti-Imperialist sentiments during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries.
Answer:
Explanation:
A. One important difference between imperialists and anti-imperialists regarding expansion during the late 19th and early 20th centuries was their stance on the acquisition of colonies and territories. Imperialists believed that the acquisition of colonies was necessary for the expansion and growth of their nations, while anti-imperialists believed that such expansion was unjust and violated the sovereignty of other nations. Anti-imperialists were against the use of military and economic power to gain control over other territories.
B. One piece of evidence that reflects anti-imperialist sentiments during the late 19th and early 20th centuries was the formation of the Anti-Imperialist League in the United States in 1898. The league was formed in opposition to the U.S.'s annexation of the Philippines and Puerto Rico and was composed of a diverse group of individuals, including religious leaders, labor leaders, and intellectuals. The league held rallies, published literature, and made speeches to spread their message of anti-imperialism and to oppose the U.S.'s actions in the Philippines. The Anti-Imperialist League is one example of the significant opposition to imperialism that existed in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.
Need Help ASAP
A. Referencing Image A, explain von Thünen's theory of agricultural land use for isolated states.
B. Identify ONE factor related to modern agriculture that invalidates von Thünen's theory.
C. Explain how improved transportation impacts the validity of von Thünen's model.
A. von Thünen's theory of agricultural land use for isolated states states that as distance from a city increases, the type of agriculture changes. Near the city, land is used for high-value crops and intensive cultivation, while further away, land is used for less intensive, lower-value crops. This is based on the concept of decreasing transportation costs as distance from the city increases.
B. One factor related to modern agriculture that invalidates von Thünen's theory is the increased use of mechanization and technology in farming. This has led to a decrease in the need for labor, making it possible to cultivate crops further away from cities without the added cost of transportation.
C. Improved transportation, such as the use of trucks and trains, has made it possible to transport goods over long distances more efficiently and at a lower cost. This has made it possible for farmers to cultivate crops further away from cities, and for consumers to have access to a wider variety of goods, regardless of where they are grown. This invalidates von Thünen's theory because it is no longer necessary to grow crops near the city in order to transport them efficiently.
A. Referencing Image A, explain von Thünen's theory of agricultural land use for isolated states.
B. Identify ONE factor related to modern agriculture that invalidates von Thünen's theory.
C. Explain how improved transportation impacts the validity of von Thünen's model.
Von Thünen's theory of agricultural land use for isolated states suggests that agricultural land use is organized into concentric rings around a market center.
Explain how improved transportation impacts the validity of von Thünen's model?The theory states that the land closest to the market center is used for higher value crops and activities, such as intensive farming, orchards, and vineyards. As one moves further away from the market center, the land is used for lower value crops, such as grain production, and finally, forest and pasture land farthest from the market center. One factor related to modern agriculture that invalidates von Thünen's theory is the development of mechanization, which has allowed for increased production of certain crops in areas that may be farther away from a market center.Improved transportation impacts the validity of von Thünen's model because it allows for easier and quicker transport of goods from farther distances. This means that even though a certain area may be farther away from a market center, crops can still be produced and transported to the market center efficiently, thus invalidating the idea that only crops with low value are produced in areas farther away from the market center.To learn more about Von Thünen's theory refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/20977905
#SPJ1
What does FRD mean when he says, "Yet our distress comes from no failure of substance."?
Franklin Delano Roosevelt was an American president from 1933 to 1945, when he died. He was in charge during the majority of the Great Depression.
Who was Franklin Delano Roosevelt?Franklin Delano Roosevelt was American president who implemented the New Deal to face the Great Depression in a different way. As stated in the question, the excerpt who belongs to his Inaugural Address where he has talked about the then-ongoing situation.
The formal language that helps to creates the reassuring tone, meaning that he wanted to restore confidence in the new government and how they would face the great Depression.
Therefore, Franklin Delano Roosevelt was an American president from 1933 to 1945, when he died. He was in charge during the majority of the Great Depression.
Learn more about Franklin Delano Roosevelt on:
https://brainly.com/question/12769612
#SPJ1
For each diagram, locate which side of the conchoidal fractures shows a right angle on the edge of the glass.
Draw an arrow on Figures 2, 3, and 4 to indicate the direction of the bullet based on the conchoidal fracture patterns.
The right angle is on the left side of the conchoidal fracture.
The conchoidal fractureThe right angle is on the left side of the conchoidal fracture. The arrow is pointing upwards.The right angle is on the left side of the conchoidal fracture. The arrow is pointing to the right.The right angle is on the right side of the conchoidal fracture. The arrow is pointing to the left.The right angle can be found on the left side of the glass.The right angle can be found on the left side of the glass and the arrow should point away from the glass.The right angle can be found on the right side of the glass and the arrow should point away from the glass.The right angle can be found on the left side of the glass and the arrow should point towards the glass.To learn more about the conchoidal fracture refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/14526355
#SPJ1
Goes along with my other questions
How many times did the suspect shoot?
How many times did the police officer shoot?
Justify your claims by citing evidence based on glass fracture patterns.
Is the officer’s testimony consistent with the evidence?
Describe other types of evidence you could obtain to support your claim about the direction the bullet was moving.
The exact number of shots fired by the suspect and the police officer is unknown and cannot be determined by glass fracture patterns.
How many times did the suspect shoot?However, the evidence from the glass fracture patterns can be used to determine the direction that the bullets were traveling.For example, if the glass fracture patterns show that the bullets were traveling in a downward angle, this could suggest that the bullets were fired from a higher position, such as the police officer. To further support this claim, other types of evidence that could be obtained include bullet casings, photographs of the crime scene, eyewitness accounts, and forensic evidence from the bullets themselves.Additionally, the officer's testimony can be compared to the evidence obtained from the crime scene to determine its consistency.In order to determine how many times the suspect and police officer shot, one would need to examine the evidence based on glass fracture patterns. Glass fracture patterns can be used to determine the direction of the bullet’s trajectory, and therefore the origin of the shot. This type of evidence might include the location and size of the bullet hole, the type of fracture pattern, and the location of any spall or fragmentation from the bullet. By examining the bullet hole, one can determine how many shots were fired and how many bullets may have struck the glass.In addition to examining the glass fracture patterns, other types of evidence could potentially be obtained to support the direction of the bullet’s trajectory. This could include analyzing ballistic evidence from the scene, such as bullet fragments and shell casings.To learn more about ballistic evidence refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/14492762
#SPJ1
Which describes the role of the paperclip in this diagram? A. It powers the circuit. B. It lights the bulb. C. It keeps the circuit open. D. It conducts electricity.
It conducts electricity.
explain whether the spread of the zika virus challenged aspects of the epidemiological transition model
Answer: The epidemiological transition model is a framework that describes how patterns of mortality and morbidity change as a population moves from being primarily agrarian to industrialized. The model proposes that as a population becomes more industrialized, the burden of disease shifts from infectious diseases to non-communicable diseases such as cancer, heart disease, and diabetes.
The spread of the Zika virus has challenged aspects of the epidemiological transition model. While the model predicts that the burden of disease should shift away from infectious diseases in industrialized populations, the Zika virus outbreak has demonstrated that even in developed countries, the threat of infectious disease remains.
The Zika virus outbreak has affected countries in the Americas, many of which are considered to be in the later stages of the epidemiological transition. The virus has been linked to severe birth defects and neurological disorders, and it has highlighted the ongoing threat of infectious disease in populations that are otherwise thought to be at low risk for such illnesses.
Additionally, the Zika virus outbreak has also challenged the model in the sense that, it has shown that the disease can be transmitted not only by mosquitoes but also through sexual contact, blood transfusions and from mother to fetus, making it a complex disease to control.
In summary, the spread of the Zika virus has challenged aspects of the epidemiological transition model by highlighting the ongoing threat of infectious disease in populations that are otherwise thought to be at low risk, and by showing that the disease can be transmitted in multiple ways.
Explanation: hope it meets your requirements for your assignment. :DD
Need help asap! This is an environmental science ap question
The Green Revolution led to the widespread use of pesticides and synthetic nitrogen fertilizers, which enhanced irrigation systems and crop variety.
Did the Green Revolution give rise to pesticides? The Green Revolution led to the widespread use of pesticides and synthetic nitrogen fertilizers, which enhanced irrigation systems and crop variety.Science-based strategies were used to achieve the core goal of achieving food security.With only a 30% increase in the area under cultivation after the green revolution, cereal crop productivity tripled.With a few notable exceptions, this happened everywhere.The elimination of poverty and the drop in food prices were also notable effects.Chemical pesticides.After World War II, the US saw a significant increase in the usage of synthetic pesticides.It was discovered in 1950 that pesticides significantly increased farm productivity compared to that before World War II.To keep insects out of their crops, farmers rely a lot on synthetic pesticides.To learn more about Green Revolution refer
https://brainly.com/question/3600672
#SPJ1
The Jones family uses up a
1
2
-gallon jug of milk every 3 days. At what rate do they drink milk?
Answer: The Jones family drinks milk at a rate of 1/2 gallon per 3 days, which is equivalent to 1/6 gallon per day.
To brainly: This is group work now its not a test no more
Help please
Point X is likely to experience high tide. The correct option is D.
What is high tide about?At high tide, the water reaches the shoreline to the greatest extent. When the tide recedes the most, it is at low tide. There can be tides in certain freshwater rivers and lakes. A king tide is a high tide that is much higher than usual.
When the tide is in at the coast, high tide occurs when the sea is at its highest level.
From the diagram showing the arrangement of the Earth, sun and moon, this was illustrated. The correct option is D.
Learn more about tide on:
https://brainly.com/question/2604305
#SPJ1
9. Which of the following is true?
A. A person under 21 years old can purchase a long gun.
OB. There is no requirement to register a gun in Texas.
OC. A person who has an assault of a family member conviction is not eligible to possess
a firearm within 5 years of conviction.
O D. All of the above
Back
Next
Answer:
None of the above statements is true.
Explanation:
In the United States, federal law prohibits individuals under the age of 21 from purchasing a handgun and some states have laws that prohibit individuals under 21 from purchasing long guns as well. There are also federal and state laws that require the registration of certain types of firearms and prohibit certain individuals, such as those convicted of domestic violence, from possessing firearms.
PLEASE HELP!! I need sources and argument points!!
Write an essay in which you argue that the federal government's system of checks and balances is or is not working as Madison intended in Federalist No. 51. Support your argument with researched sources and a thorough understanding of Madison's vision.
As you research and formulate your response, ask yourself these questions:
What was Madison's view of human nature that led him to propose this system?
Why did Madison argue that "the private interest of every individual may be a sentinel over the public rights"?
Is legislative gridlock a logical consequence of Madison's system, and if so, is it what Madison intended?
Does the existence of iron triangles mean that the system of checks and balances is broken?
What might occur if political power were not as fragmented as it is under Madison's scheme?
Answer:
In Federalist No. 51, James Madison proposed a system of checks and balances in order to limit the power of the federal government and protect individual rights. Madison believed that human nature was inherently self-interested and that power corrupts, so he proposed a system that would divide and fragment political power among different branches and levels of government.
Madison argued that the system of checks and balances would ensure that "the private interest of every individual may be a sentinel over the public rights." This means that by giving each branch of government the power to check the actions of the other branches, the system would prevent any one branch from becoming too powerful and oppressive. For example, the legislative branch can check the executive branch by impeachment and by passing laws, the executive branch can check the legislative branch by vetoing laws, and the judicial branch can check both the executive and legislative branches by interpreting laws and striking down unconstitutional actions.
However, some argue that legislative gridlock, in which the different branches are unable to pass legislation due to conflicting interests, is a logical consequence of Madison's system. This gridlock can be seen as a necessary trade-off for protecting individual rights, as it ensures that laws are not passed without proper consideration and debate. However, it can also be seen as a problem, as it can prevent necessary legislation from being passed in a timely manner.
Another potential issue with Madison's system is the existence of "iron triangles," in which interest groups and bureaucrats form alliances with members of Congress to push their own agenda. This can lead to a concentration of power in certain areas, undermining the fragmentation of power that Madison intended.
If political power were not as fragmented as it is under Madison's scheme, it is likely that the government would be more efficient, but also more prone to abuse of power. In such a case, the rights and freedoms of individuals would be at greater risk.
In conclusion, while the federal government's system of checks and balances has its flaws, it is still an important mechanism for protecting individual rights and limiting the power of the federal government. Madison's views on human nature and his belief in the corrupting nature of power are still relevant today, and the system of checks and balances continues to serve as an important safeguard against the abuse of power. However, it is important to be aware of the potential issues with the system, such as legislative gridlock and iron triangles, and to work to address them in order to ensure that the system is working as Madison intended.
Explanation:
Engel v. Vitale / Excerpts from the Majority Opinion
1. What historical example does the Court use to justify its decision?
2. The Court cites "the dangers of a union of Church and State." Explain.
3. What does the Court respond to the argument that the prayer was "non-denominational and
voluntary?"
4. How does the Court respond to the state's argument that preventing the government from
sponsoring a prayer amounts to hostility toward religion?
Answer:
The Court uses the example of the Establishment Clause in the First Amendment of the Constitution to justify its decision.
The Court cites "the dangers of a union of Church and State" by referring to the fact that such a union could lead to a government-sponsored religion and restrict religious freedom. The Court argues that such a union would be in violation of the First Amendment's protection of religious freedom.
The Court responds to the argument that the prayer was "non-denominational and voluntary" by stating that it is immaterial whether the prayer was voluntary or not. The Court argues that the presence of a prayer in a public school, regardless of its content, constitutes government sponsorship of religion.
The Court responds to the state's argument that preventing the government from sponsoring a prayer amounts to hostility toward religion by stating that the Establishment Clause is not a hostility toward religion, but rather a protection of religious freedom. The Court argues that allowing the government to sponsor a prayer would actually be hostile to religion because it would restrict religious freedom by promoting one particular religious viewpoint over others.
PLEASE HELP!! The data is attached
2. Examine the data and then respond to questions A, B, and C:
Draw a single conclusion that is supported by all three graphs. What are the data most clearly trying to show? Explain your answer.
Explain how the data shed light on the idea that the Supreme Court is sometimes "liberal" and sometimes "conservative." What context does the data give this notion that is not otherwise obvious? Support your explanation.
Draw a conclusion about judicial activism or judicial restraint that is supported by the data shown. Explain the connection between the data and your conclusion.
United states government adopted a separation of power. Meaning that the government is divided into several branches and each branches had their own duty to fulfil.
What is supreme court?The supreme court has been considerd as a part of the judiciary branch, and its main duty is to interpret the law and resolving conflicts between individuals in the country.
This generally means that when it comes to promoting social progress, there is a question on the limitation that the supreme court can do to not engaged with the duty of both executive and legislative branch.
Therefore, United states government adopted a separation of power. Meaning that the government is divided into several branches and each branches had their own duty to fulfil.
Learn more about United states on:
https://brainly.com/question/1527526
#SPJ1
What change in momentum does an object experience if it experiences a force described by the function below during a time interval of 0
0.88.
F=(9860 N/s)t - (10894 N/s2)t2
J = Ft
Ft() = kt + τ
at time 0 s
Ft(0) = 1(0) + 1
Ft(0) = 1 Ns
at time , t = 3 s
Ft(3) = 1(3) + 1
Ft(3) = 4 Ns
Change in momentum from 0 s to 3 s, = 4 Ns - 1 s = 3 Ns
Thus, the change in the momentum of the object moving along a straight line is determined as 3 Ns.
What is change in the momentum of the object?The change in the momentum of the object moving along a straight line is determined as 3 Ns.The impulse received by the object is determined from the product of force and time of action.
Change in momentum of the object is the change in the momentum of the object is equal to impulse received by the object.
Therefore, Thus, the change in the momentum of the object moving along a straight line is determined as 3 Ns.
Learn more about momentum on:
https://brainly.com/question/4956182
#SPJ1
Please answer all three questions need help asap!
(iii) Describe one reason why Pesticide B was used beginning in 2006 through 2012 rather than increasing the amount of Pesticide A
from 2006 to 2012.
(iv) Propose a solution to decrease the total amount of chemical pesticides used in Britain for agriculture
v) Justify the solution you proposed in(iv) by explaining one of its potential advantages over chemical pesticides.
Answer:
(iii) One reason why Pesticide B was used beginning in 2006 through 2012 rather than increasing the amount of Pesticide A could be that Pesticide B was found to be more effective in controlling certain pests that had become resistant to Pesticide A. Additionally, Pesticide B may have had fewer negative impacts on the environment and/or human health compared to Pesticide A.
(iv) A solution to decrease the total amount of chemical pesticides used in Britain for agriculture could be to increase the use of integrated pest management (IPM) techniques. This could involve a combination of methods such as crop rotation, biological control (using natural predators to control pests), and targeted use of chemical pesticides only when necessary.
(v) One potential advantage of integrated pest management over chemical pesticides is that it can be more sustainable in the long-term. Chemical pesticides can lead to the development of resistant pests, which means that farmers have to use increasingly large amounts of pesticides to achieve the same level of control. Additionally, overuse of chemical pesticides can have negative impacts on the environment and human health. Integrated pest management, on the other hand, can be more effective in the long-term by using a variety of methods that do not rely solely on chemical pesticides. This can lead to reduced pesticide use, less pest resistance and fewer negative impacts on the environment and human health.
a baby kitten, gained 120 grams of weight in
1
3
of a month. If Mittens kept growing at this rate, how much weight would he gain in 1 month?
Mittens, a young kitten, put on 120 grams of weight in just one-third of a month. How much would he gain in a month if his mitts maintained growing at this rate?
What is the example of weight?
A tiny kitten named Mittens gained 120 grams of weight in only one-third of a month. If his mitts continued to develop at this rate, how much weight would he gain in a month? The International System of Units (SI) defines the newton as the unit of force, which is used to measure weight. For instance, a kilogram of matter weighs around 9.8 newtons on Earth's surface and about one-sixth as much on the Moon.
noun. A way to express how much something weighs or how heavy it is. the upward force that gravity causes a mass to experience in physics.
Know more about maintained Visit:
https://brainly.com/question/21635529
#SPJ1
Election Campaign Ads show how government officials use the media to — ? communicate with other countries , approve federal legislation , influence political lobbyists , communicate with the public
Election Campaign Ads show how government officials use the media to communicate with the public. The correct option is D.
What methods do campaigns use to influence voters?The core of a political campaign is persuading voters. Since the founding of our nation, advertisements, theme songs, stump speeches, and even negative campaigning have existed.
Since then, every technological advancement has created new ways for candidates to influence voters.
By persuading those who see the advertisements to vote for the candidate, the media aids candidates in winning.
Thus, the correct option is D.
For more details regarding election campaign, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/24233984
#SPJ1
PLEASE HELP!! I NEED SOURCES AND ARGUMENT POINTS FOR THIS PROMPT. I will give Brainliest. Please don't answer this for the points. I really do need help.
Write an essay in which you argue whether the power of judicial review is anti-democratic. Use examples from Marbury v. Madison, Bush v. Gore, and Federalist No. 78 to support your argument, but also make use of the excerpt from David O'Brien's Storm Center and any outside resources necessary to provide sufficient evidence.
As you research and formulate your response, ask yourself these questions:
Does the power of judicial review grant the courts more power than the other branches of government?
Does the possibility of a constitutional amendment serve as a check on the power of judicial review?
How important is it for the courts to maintain public confidence in the legitimacy of their decisions?
In what other cases has the Court been out of step with public opinion?
Answer:Dear Alexander Hamilton,
In Federalist, No. 78 you describe the judicial branch by saying, "It can never attack with success either of the other two." I'm afraid I have to disagree with this statement because the Supreme Court can strike down any laws or acts of the president deemed unconstitutional. This power is given to the Court in Article III of the Constitution. In Marbury v. Madison, the Supreme Court gave itself the power of judicial review. This means only the Supreme Court can decide what's constitutional. Because of this, I think the Supreme Court has more power than the executive and legislative branches.
Respectfully,
Explanation: plato
PLEASE HELP!! I need argument points and sources!!
Write an essay in which you use evidence from the post-Trump political landscape to reevaluate Anis Shivani's predictions. How do party politics today prove or disprove Shivani's original arguments? Draw your own conclusions. As you conduct research, focus on at least some of the following topics from the 2003 article:
Divided government
Voter turnout
Candidate-centered elections
Party realignment
Changing trends in media
Polarization
The role of third parties
Start by examining the two articles about Donald Trump that are listed on the assignment page, but conduct additional research as needed.
After you have formulated your argument, anticipate readers who may disagree with your position by refuting at least one counterargument. You may devote an entire body paragraph to the counterargument. Alternatively, you may respond to a counterargument in the same paragraph in which you make a larger point.
Answer:
Anis Shivani wrote "The End of Politics" in 2003, in which he predicted the decline of the two-party system and the rise of third parties in the American political landscape. In the post-Trump political landscape, we can see that some of Shivani's predictions have come true, while others have not.
Divided government: Shivani argued that divided government, where the presidency and Congress are controlled by different parties, would become the norm. This has indeed come to fruition, with the presidency being held by Democrats and Congress being controlled by Republicans for the majority of the Trump administration.
Voter turnout: Shivani also predicted that voter turnout would decline, as citizens would become disillusioned with the political process. While voter turnout has increased in some elections, it remains lower than in previous decades.
Candidate-centered elections: Shivani believed that elections would become more candidate-centered, as opposed to party-centered. This prediction has not come to fruition, as the two major parties continue to hold a strong grip on the American political system.
Party realignment: Shivani argued that the two major parties would realign and become more ideologically diverse. While there has been some movement within the parties, the two-party system remains firmly in place.
Changing trends in media: Shivani predicted that the media would play a more significant role in politics, which has indeed come true with the rise of social media and the 24-hour news cycle.
Polarization: Shivani argued that polarization would increase, with both parties becoming more ideologically extreme. This prediction has come to fruition, with both parties becoming more divided along ideological lines.
The role of third parties: Shivani predicted that third parties would play a more significant role in American politics. While third parties have made some gains, they still remain largely marginalized.
In conclusion, while some of Shivani's predictions have come true, others have not. The two-party system remains firmly in place, and the major parties continue to dominate American politics. However, the increase in polarization and the growing role of media in politics suggest that the American political landscape is changing.
Counterargument: Some may argue that Shivani's predictions were incorrect because they were based on a flawed understanding of American politics. They may argue that the two-party system is deeply ingrained in American culture and that third parties will never be able to gain significant traction. However, the increasing polarization of the two major parties and the growing disillusionment of voters suggest that the political landscape may indeed be changing, and that third parties may play a more significant role in the future.
