Answers
The saying "cross that bridge when you come to it" implies one should only deal with a problem when and if it arises.
Hope this helps! Have a good day. :)Related Questions
20 POINTS HELPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP PLSSSSSSS
Answers
15 points pls help me
Answers
Similar
Similar
25 POINTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! HELPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
Answers
Answer: It is either the second or third one. I am more towards the third one in my opinion, but I am not so sure about it.
Explanation:
20 POINTS HELPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP PLSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS PLS PLS PLS
Answers
Answer:
The first one
Explanation:
Who said this,
" When one door closes, another opens; but we often look so long and so regretfully upon the closed door that we do not see the one which has opened for us. "
Answers
who dies in the outsiders :(
Answers
Answer:
Johnny Cade dies after being severely burned in a church fire, and Dally, a member of the Greasers, is shot by police.
Explanation:
help me
image below:
Answers
Explanation:
Answer: B) what people actually do is important than what they say.
An adage is an old, familiar saying that conveys a basic truth.
Highlight the sentence in the paragraph that contains an adage
Answers
Answer:
two wrongs don't make a right.
Answer:
two wrongs don't make a right.
Explanation:
hope its help
help me!!!
A. Although at times friends may disagree, they should never treat each other with anger or disrespect.
B. The fact that someone has done something unfair or upsetting does not justify acting in a similar way.
C. It is important to be able to admit to mistakes when one makes them.
D. By working together, people can complete tasks more quickly and efficiently.
Answers
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Im pretty sure it's A bc I've had questions like this before and have gotten them right
A
Explanation:
Because it’s the one that makes the most sense with the paragraph
What is a counter claim to video games improve critical thinking
Answers
They help them become better for the real world by using strategies, working together in teams, and communicating which are essential skills used nowadays in today's world, by applying for a job in the 21st century.
Critical thinking, Communication, Problem-solving, Leadership, Creativity, Etc.
Who said this,
“Don't keep forever on the public road,going only where others have gone, and following one after the other like a flock of sheep.
Answers
By Alexander Graham Bell
Explanation:
HELPPPPPPP PLSSSSSSSS
Answers
I'm SOOOO sorry if this is incorrect (I do not have the materials), but I would guess the last one (based on summaries)
Which of the following formats would benefit from the use of multiple narrators?
A novel about three friends' experiences at boarding school
A poem that discusses the beauty of nature
An article about the discovery of a new species of turtle
An autobiography of a famous inventor
Answers
Answer:
The format that would benefit most from the use of multiple narrators is a novel about three friends' experiences at boarding school.
Explanation:
This is because the novel would be able to explore the experiences of each friend from their own unique perspective. This would allow the reader to get a more well-rounded view of the story and to better understand the characters.
The other formats would not benefit as much from the use of multiple narrators. A poem about the beauty of nature would be better served by a single narrator who can use their own personal voice to express their love of nature. An article about the discovery of a new species of turtle would be better served by a single narrator who can provide a clear and concise overview of the discovery. An autobiography of a famous inventor would be better served by a single narrator who can share their own personal story of how they came to be an inventor.
Here are some specific examples of how multiple narrators could be used in a novel about three friends' experiences at boarding school:
One narrator could be the oldest friend, who is trying to navigate the challenges of being a new student at boarding school.
Another narrator could be the middle friend, who is trying to find her place in the school and make new friends.
The third narrator could be the youngest friend, who is trying to adjust to being away from home for the first time.
By using multiple narrators, the novel would be able to explore the experiences of each friend from their own unique perspective. This would allow the reader to get a more well-rounded view of the story and to better understand the characters.
100 pointsss also we are going against the discoverer keeping the treasure
Finding Sunken Treasure: Argumentative Performance Task
Part 2
You will now review your notes and sources, and plan, draft, revise, and edit your writing. You may use your notes and refer to the sources. Now read your assignment and the information about how your writing will be scored; then begin your work.
Your Assignment:
As a follow-up to the recent class field trip in which you viewed treasure found on a sunken ship, your history teacher has asked that you write an essay in which you argue whether or not a discoverer should have the right to keep sunken treasure that has been found. Your argument will be posted on the class website for teachers, students, and parents to read.
Your assignment is to use the sources to write a multi-paragraph argumentative essay supporting or opposing the claim of a discoverer to keep the sunken treasure that was found. Make sure you establish an argumentative claim, acknowledge opposing arguments, and support your claim with reasons and details from the sources you have read. Develop your ideas clearly and use your own words, except when quoting directly from the sources. Be sure to identify the sources by title or number when using details or facts directly from the sources.
Answers
Answer:
Let me know if this helps:
Should the discoverer of sunken treasure have the right to keep it?
The discovery of sunken treasure is a fascinating event that has captured the imagination of people for centuries. However, there is a great deal of debate about who should have the right to keep the treasure once it is found. Some people believe that the discoverer should be allowed to keep the treasure, while others believe that the treasure should be returned to the country or state in which it was found.
There are several arguments in favor of allowing the discoverer to keep the treasure. First, the discoverer often takes great risks and invests a lot of time and money in finding the treasure. It is only fair that they should be rewarded for their efforts. Second, the discoverer may be the only person who knows where the treasure is located. If they are not allowed to keep the treasure, it may never be found. Third, the discoverer may be able to use the treasure to fund further exploration and research. This could lead to the discovery of even more treasure.
However, there are also several arguments against allowing the discoverer to keep the treasure. First, the treasure may have been lost for centuries. It is possible that the original owners of the treasure are long since dead. In this case, it is not clear who the treasure actually belongs to. Second, the treasure may be of great historical or cultural significance. If it is sold to a private collector, it may be lost to the public forever. Third, the treasure may be located in a sensitive or environmentally sensitive area. If it is excavated, it could damage the environment.
In my opinion, the discoverer of sunken treasure should not have the right to keep it. The treasure should be returned to the country or state in which it was found. This is the fairest and most equitable solution. It ensures that the treasure is preserved for future generations and that it is not lost to the public. It also ensures that the treasure is not used to fund further exploration and research that could damage the environment.
In conclusion, there are strong arguments on both sides of the debate about who should have the right to keep sunken treasure. However, I believe that the most fair and equitable solution is to return the treasure to the country or state in which it was found. This ensures that the treasure is preserved for future generations and that it is not lost to the public.
Explanation:
Your friend offers you an opportunity to make a great deal of money very quickly. He has arranged to set up an off-shore account for your profits. He will not tell you exactly how he is making this money, but you get the impression it is not exactly legal. He only wants an investment of $500 and promises you will have enough from your minimal investment that you will never need to work again. What do you do?
300 words max
Answers
Answer: Demand to know the details before getting involved
explanation: Offshore accounts are not illegal - at least by most countries' laws. However, you have to be careful with what you invest your money in. Investments with high returns are usually too good to be true because these are usually Ponzi schemes or some other scam. It never hurts to ask a few questions before giving your money.
Explanation:
From the impression of your friend, we can easily acknowledge that it is not something legal, which means your friend's actions basically is illegal. However, first off, if you agree to invest 500 dollars for him, you should not accept; instead, decline. Why? It is so obvious! You don't even know what he's actually going to do! We must remember consequences will always come back to us. Since it's illegal, you may be punished in the future. So to conclude, we should decline his offer.
What is the purpose of stage productions written by playwrights?
Responses
to have an audience listen to a performance
to have an audience watch actors perform within the same room
to have an audience engage in a drama through text
to have an audience watch a filmed version of a performance
Answers
Playwriting is about storytelling—creating a world and characters from scratch and capturing listeners with their story—but it's also about live performance; in fact, it's this critical element that separates playwrights from novelists or screenwriters.
Answer: I don't know, i'm just hear for the points.
Explanation:
PLSSSSSS HELP PLS PLS PLS PLS 30 POINTS
Which sentence states a theme of “The Red-Headed League” and belongs in a summary of the story?
Drag the correct answer into the box.
Answers
Answer: when Mr Wilson loses this job with the red headed league, it shows that failure is always a possibility.
Explanation:
