Salary and benefits, theft of company property, self-dealing, exploitation of corporate possibilities, insider trading, and neglect of board duties are only a few examples of major conflicts of interest.
What could possibly be wrong with interconnected directorates?Interlocking directorates are typically a problem that is harmful for both enterprises and the director. If a board member joins the board of a competing company, they will likely have access to proprietary information, which promotes unfair competition.
What makes for a good example of overlapping directorates?If a firm purchases another company and one of its executives or directors is a member of the boards of directors or a director of both companies, for example, there may be a conflict of interest with the interlocking directorates. The shareholders or other board members frequently elect or nominate the members of the board of directors.
Learn more about Interlocking directorates: https://brainly.com/question/8467990
#SPJ1
From it conception, the method of transferring cargo by way of containerized cargo was supposed to speed up bulk cargo. Unfortunately, despite best efforts, such transfer has also included the arrival of illegal persons to this country. How is it that such actions are not being caught despite the technology?
Based on the information, such transfer has also included the arrival of illegal persons to this country which was not caught in the presence of technology due to human support.
What is the importance of technology?Technology refers to the introduction of advanced tools based on scientific knowledge which makes ease of life through efficiency and quick response through the innovative method.
The technology is also introduced by humans so it has some side effects that cause errors in functioning. When any illegal entry is observed through cargo it is caused by loopholes in technology or any internal human assistance provided to them to enter the territory.
Learn more about Technology, here:
https://brainly.com/question/9171028
#SPJ1
Referring to the principles pf proportionality, targeting and consistency of approach within the enforcement policy statement. what will the enforcement agency have considered when deciding on this enforcement action? NEBOSH DIPLOMA
When deciding on an enforcement action, an enforcement agency would consider the following:
Proportionality: The enforcement agency would ensure that the action taken is proportional to the seriousness of the offense. The action taken should not be more severe than necessary to achieve the desired result. The agency will consider the gravity of the offense, the harm caused, the culpability of the offender, and the public interest in taking action.Targeting: The enforcement agency would ensure that the action taken is directed at the appropriate offender. The agency will consider factors such as the risk posed by the offender, their previous conduct, the level of cooperation with the agency, and the need to deter others from committing similar offenses.Consistency of approach: The enforcement agency would ensure that the action taken is consistent with its policies and previous enforcement actions. The agency will consider the nature of the offense, the context in which it was committed, and any relevant aggravating or mitigating circumstances.Overall, the enforcement agency will need to balance the principles of proportionality, targeting, and consistency of approach when deciding on an enforcement action. It will need to take into account all relevant factors and circumstances and ensure that the action taken is both fair and effective in achieving its enforcement objectives.
Huey long criticized roosevelt’s new deal policies because he believed.
Huey Long disagreed with Roosevelt's New Deal initiatives because he thought more extreme measures were required to alleviate poverty.
What can be done to alleviate poverty?
Applications for economic protection, together with those for social protection, food assistance, tax credits, and housing assistance, can help create opportunity by reducing short-term poverty and hardship and, in doing so, enhancing children's long-term outcomes.
Each year, the government allots a budget to each faculty to cover its regular expenses, which include books, maintenance, stationery, and strength. Compared to academic institutions that are permitted to set their own prices, no-price colleges receive greater money.
With the help of its strategy, the Philippine government hopes to end extreme poverty by 2040. Additionally, the government has implemented a number of policies and reforms to reduce poverty by focusing on the financial system as a whole, healthcare, and education.
The social security system is one of the main government policies to address extreme poverty levels. The government's primary strategy for reducing poverty is social safety programs, while secondary initiatives include free or heavily discounted housing and vital services.
To learn more about alleviating poverty visit;
https://brainly.com/question/14285856
#SPJ4
As a driver you have a responsibility to pedestrians that is:
a. Legal
b. Moral
c. Both A and B are correct
d. Neither A nor B is correct
Answer:
As a driver, you have a responsibility to pedestrians that is both legal and moral.
Drivers have a legal obligation to operate their vehicles in a safe manner and to abide by traffic laws, including laws that protect pedestrians. They also have a moral obligation to take into account the safety and well-being of others, including pedestrians, when operating a vehicle.
Therefore, the correct answer is "c. Both A and B are correct."
Explanation:
A bakery negotiated with a supplier regarding a long-term commitment to supply flour. They agreed to specific terms to be memorialized in a written contract. Due to an oversight, the supplier never signed the written contract, although it began providing flour to the bakery under the terms of their agreement. Six months later, the price of flour rose dramatically following a nationwide drought. The supplier, realizing that it had never signed the contract, told the bakery that it would have to charge a higher price for the flour. The bakery properly filed a complaint in federal district court, alleging that the flour supplier had breached their contract. The flour supplier filed an answer in which it denied the factual allegations in the complaint regarding the price and duration of the contract, but did not raise any affirmative defenses. The following day, the flour supplier filed a motion to dismiss, asserting that the oral contract between the parties violated the Statute of Frauds.
Can the court grant the defendant's motion to dismiss?
Yes, because the answer denied the factual allegations regarding the terms of the contract.
Yes, because the complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted.
No, because the defendant waived any objection on the pleadings by filing an answer.
No, because the defendant did not assert a defense based on the Statute of Frauds in its answer.
In the above court case, it may be stated that the court may grant the defendant's motion to dismiss, since the complaint had failed to state a claim upon which there can be a claim being relieved. Therefore, the option B holds true.
A court has the power to grant a motion in the case before an actual trial is being held in the court of law as per the legal procedures. In the cases that involve complaints being filed over which a claim can also be made, it automatically applies to the doctrine of granting a motion to dismiss for the defendant, according to the essentials of the law.
Learn more about motion here:
brainly.com/question/28432756
#SPJ4
when do the courts choose how to detain a juvenile and decide if the case will be handled formally or informally?
When someone is accused of a crime, the type of case is... a. civil
b. criminal
c. federal
d. Bench
A criminal case exists when someone is suspected of committing a crime. When someone sues another individual, business, or corporation, this is referred to as a civil case.
What is a criminal case?
When a prosecutor working for the federal, state, or municipal government accuses someone of committing a crime, it is known as a criminal case. Criminal proceedings often start after the suspect is detained and charged, typically at an indictment hearing. The defendant in a criminal case is always presumed innocent until proven guilty in court beyond a reasonable doubt. When a court finds someone guilty of committing a crime, a criminal law sentence may follow. These punishments can include community service, a fine, an incarceration sentence, or a combination of all three.
To learn more about criminal cases visit;
https://brainly.com/question/30278728
#SPJ4
What is the right to privacy and how is it protected by the Constitution?
As a result of the guarantee of life and liberty in Article 21 of the Constitution, privacy is a right that is guaranteed by the constitution.
The right to privacy in India has changed during the past 60 years as a result of various rulings. Over the years, there has been disagreement over whether the right to privacy is a fundamental right due to inconsistency from two early rulings. The evaluation and interpretation of constitutional provisions must guarantee that they are in line with the international human rights treaties that India has ratified. According to the court, privacy is a fundamental prerequisite for the meaningful exercise of other guaranteed freedoms.
To learn more about right to privacy visit;
https://brainly.com/question/2033492
#SPJ4
why did the scopes trial take place? what was the controvery in the case? why was the case so important to both sides
Journalist H. L. Mencken dubbed the 1925 prosecution of high school teacher John T. Scopes for breaking the Tennessee Butler Act, which forbade the teaching of evolution in public institutions.
The case was prosecuted as the "Scopes monkey trial." A plaintiff who has been wounded is one of the crucial components of what the Court views as a case or controversy.
A crucial criterion of the Court's definition of standing is that a plaintiff must demonstrate that they have actually experienced "injury." Listening to the accuser as well as the one who made the accusation is known as hearing both sides.
Learn more about scopes controvery Visit: brainly.com/question/16931527
#SPJ4
8. Law enforcement/police calls are
______based upon_____
by urgency and dispatched
priority levels and responder availability.
when congress wants to regulate an issue, it most often passes very detailed regulations so that there are no questions about its intent.
Is the statement true or false?
It is true that when Congress wants to control anything, they frequently establish highly specific regulations to ensure that there are no ambiguities regarding their intentions.
While Cabinet members and the leaders of independent executive agencies, like the director of the Environmental Protection Agency, serve "at the pleasure of the president" and are subject to removal without cause, independent regulatory agency heads are typically only subject to removal for cause.
Terms in this group (32) When Congress intends to control anything, it frequently enacts very specific regulations to ensure that there are no ambiguities regarding its intentions. The Securities Exchange Commission was established by Congress with the passage of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. This law, which established a separate regulatory body, is referred to as legislation.
Learn more about congress Visit: brainly.com/question/779570
#SPJ4
Krugman advocates that it is logical to expect the US government to ignore special-interest politics when forming policy.
True or false?
False. According to Krugman, it is realistic to expect that the US government will ignore special-interest politics when making judgments.
According to Paul Krugman, a strategic trade policy that seeks to give domestic businesses an advantage in a global industry is a beggar-thy-neighbors tactic that increases national income at the expense of other countries. Such measures are likely to be opposed by other nations that try to enact them.
The argument for trade policy argues that it is appropriate for the government to offer subsidies to start-up companies. In light of this, the strategic trade policy argument suggests that a government should use subsidies to support promising companies that operate in recently emerging industries.
Learn more about government policy Visit: brainly.com/question/3810659
#SPJ4
what system consists of both a sovereign central government and sovereign regional governments?
The federal system consists of both a sovereign central government and sovereign regional governments.
What is a federal system government?
The fundamental framework of American governance is defined by federalism and the federal system. The Constitutional Convention saw lots of arguments. Many delegates feared an overly powerful central government and worried that states' rights would only preserve the fragile structure of government established under the Articles. As a compromise, the Constitution established a federal system of governance (federalism). Power is shared and divided between the federalist system's national and state governments. Both levels directly impact individuals and have their own agencies and officials.
To learn more about federal system visit;
https://brainly.com/question/30154201
#SPJ4
Due to the rising cost of water, Congress enacted a statute that allocated $20 million to fund a consortium of independent non-profit water organizations. The purpose of the consortium was to address the various issues causing a rise in the cost of water and water shortages across the United States, and to fund research into solutions. The statute provided clear guidelines about what the consortium should research and what it could spend, and specified that the remaining funds would be allocated for infrastructure improvements. In addition, the statute delegated to the Department of the Interior the power to select the water organizations to participate in the consortium.
Is the statute constitutional?
No, because Congress is delegating its authority to the executive branch of the government.
No, because the statute exceeds the scope of Congress's investigative power.
Yes, because Congress has the power to enact this legislation under the Necessary and Proper Clause.
Yes, because Congress has the power to spend for the general welfare of the public.
Option 1 is Correct. Because Congress has given the executive arm of the government authority, the statute is not constitutional.
A law passed by Congress that included $20 million was intended to fund a coalition of independent, non-profit water organizations in response to the rising cost of water. The consortium's goal was to solve the myriad problems that were driving up water prices and creating shortages all throughout the country while also funding research into potential remedies.
The act indicated that the consortium's leftover assets would be used for infrastructure upgrades, and it provided specific criteria for the kind of research it should conduct and the amount of money it may spend. In addition, the act gave the Secretary of the Interior the authority to choose which water groups would be included in the consortium.
Learn more about constitutional Visit: brainly.com/question/470736
#SPJ4
Correct Question:
Due to the rising cost of water, Congress enacted a statute that allocated $20 million to fund a consortium of independent non-profit water organizations. The purpose of the consortium was to address the various issues causing a rise in the cost of water and water shortages across the United States, and to fund research into solutions. The statute provided clear guidelines about what the consortium should research and what it could spend, and specified that the remaining funds would be allocated for infrastructure improvements. In addition, the statute delegated to the Department of the Interior the power to select the water organizations to participate in the consortium.
Is the statute constitutional?
1. No, because Congress is delegating its authority to the executive branch of the government.
2. No, because the statute exceeds the scope of Congress's investigative power.
3. Yes, because Congress has the power to enact this legislation under the Necessary and Proper Clause.
4. Yes, because Congress has the power to spend for the general welfare of the public.
THREE POLICYMAKERS ARE DISCUSSING HOW TO ENSURE A JUST DISTRIBUTION OF A NATIONAL CAKE
Answer:
A just distribution of a national cake refers to the equitable distribution of resources and benefits within a country among its citizens. This concept is important because it ensures that everyone has equal access to opportunities and resources to improve their standard of living. Three policymakers discussing how to ensure a just distribution of a national cake may consider the following:
Redistribution of wealth: The policymakers may propose policies that involve redistributing wealth from the rich to the poor. This could be done through progressive taxation, subsidies, and transfer programs.
Providing basic services: The policymakers may focus on providing basic services like healthcare, education, and housing to all citizens, regardless of their economic status.
Improving access to job opportunities: The policymakers may aim to create job opportunities in underdeveloped regions to reduce the gap between rich and poor.
Encouraging entrepreneurship: The policymakers may also encourage entrepreneurship and provide support to small businesses, particularly in rural areas.
Promoting equality: The policymakers may promote equality of opportunities, including education, healthcare, and employment.
Explanation:
By considering these and other related measures, the policymakers may ensure that the national cake is distributed justly, leading to a more equitable and sustainable future for all citizens.
ALLEN
Answer:citizien promotion
Explanation:
A plaintiff was severely injured when her car collided with the defendant's truck on a highway in State A. The plaintiff was a citizen of State B and the defendant was a citizen of State A. The defendant had no contacts with State B. The plaintiff filed suit in federal district court in State B under diversity jurisdiction, asserting a state law claim for damages resulting from the defendant's alleged negligence. The defendant filed an answer, specifically denying each of the plaintiff's claims. Three months later, after discovery concluded and just before trial, the defendant filed a motion to dismiss the action for lack of personal jurisdiction.Should the court dismiss the action for lack of personal jurisdiction over the defendant?
A
No, because dismissal would prejudice the plaintiff, since discovery has already occurred in the case.
B
No, because the defendant has waived the objection to the court's jurisdiction.
C
Yes, because the defendant had no contacts with State B.
D
Yes, because the court may dismiss an action for lack of personal jurisdiction at any time prior to final judgment.
The correct answer is (D) Yes, because the court may dismiss an action for lack of personal jurisdiction at any time prior to final judgment.
Even if the defendant previously answered the complaint without raising the question of personal jurisdiction, they can bring it again in a petition to dismiss. The defendant may object to personal jurisdiction in a timely manner by putting it in their initial reply pleading or by filing a separate move to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction.
As a result, the court has the authority to dismiss the action for lack of personal jurisdiction over the defendant, even if it occurs shortly before trial and after discovery, because lack of personal jurisdiction is a fundamental issue that affects the court's ability to exercise jurisdiction over the defendant.
For such more question on jurisdiction:
https://brainly.com/question/26659100
#SPJ4
the national labor relations act of 1935 established bargaining in labor-management relations. True/False ?
It is true to say that the national labor relations act of 1935 established bargaining in labor-management relations.
The National labor relations act of 1935, otherwise called the Wagner Act, is an essential resolution of US work regulation that ensures the right of private area representatives to coordinate into worker's guilds, participate in aggregate haggling, and make an aggregate move like strikes. Integral to the demonstration was a prohibition on organization unions. The demonstration was composed by Representative Robert F. Wagner, passed by the 74th US Congress, and endorsed into regulation by President Franklin D. Roosevelt.
The National labor relations act looks to address the "imbalance of bartering power" among bosses and representatives by advancing aggregate haggling between worker's guilds and managers.
To know more about National labor relations act,visit here:
https://brainly.com/question/28335275
#SPJ4
the biden administration has proposed changes to the ________.
Other loan forgiveness programs were also up for potential revisions under the Biden administration.
In order to promote voluntary conservation efforts on private property, the Biden administration asked for regulatory reforms on Wednesday. Part of this was done by absolving landowners of liability for small-scale harm or death of endangered species. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's proposed rule describes methods to make permitting for harm that would otherwise be prohibited under the Endangered Species Act simpler. Prior to the proposal's publication to the public, The Associated Press was given information about it. Landowners must take action to help endangered species, especially pollinators like monarch butterflies and bumblebees, in order to qualify. As more animals and plants are threatened by trends like urban growth, climate change, and other issues, the goal is to turn landowners into allies rather than enemies.
To learn more about Biden administration visit;
https://brainly.com/question/22716942
#SPJ4
A mother bought reusable snack bags from a company. The company uses an antibacterial agent called triclosan in its snack bags to help prevent mold from growing in the reusable bags. Triclosan is a known toxin that may, if used in a sufficient amount, weaken the immune system, especially when used in a moist environment, such as with reusable snack bags containing fruit or other damp foods. The mother who purchased the snack bags sued the company in federal court because she believed that the toxins in the company's snack bags caused her son to contract an illness due to his weakened immune system. At a trial without a jury, the judge, despite finding that the amount of triclosan used by the company in its snack bags was sufficient to cause the weakening of a child's immune system, held for the company because the plaintiff failed to prove that the boy would not have suffered from this particular illness unless his immune system had been weakened. In an unrelated action also filed against the company in the same federal court, a father sought damages from the company on behalf of his daughter, who contracted an illness after using the company's snack bags. During the trial, the father moved, on the basis of collateral estoppel, to prevent the company from contending that the amount of triclosan it used in its snack bags was insufficient to cause the weakening of a child's immune system.
Can the court grant this motion?
A. Yes, because offensive use of collateral estoppel is permitted.
B. Yes, because the facts involved are related in time, space, origin, or motivation.
C. No, because a jury did not render a final judgment on the merits.
D. No, because the daughter was not a party in the prior case.
Out of the given choices of alternatives, it may be said that the court can grant motion in the situation given above, since the offensive usage of the collateral estoppel is permissible. Therefore, the option A holds true.
A court has the power to grant a motion in the case before an actual trial is being held in the court of law as per the legal procedures. In the cases that involve usage of collaterals in an offensive way, it automatically applies to the doctrine of collateral estoppel, and is thus permissible. Thus, the court readily grants motion in such cases.
Learn more about motion here:
https://brainly.com/question/28432756
#SPJ4
Explain how the US Supreme Court related their reasoning for creating the Exclusionary Rule in Mapp v. Ohio to deciding the Good Faith exception in US v. Leon.
what is the controversial policy enforced by the EEOC that seeks to remedy past discrimination?
The policy regarding the inclusion of affirmative actions was a controversial policy enforced by the EEOC that sought to remedy past the practice of discrimination.
The policy of affirmative action had been brought into enforcement into the American society with an intention to provide remedial relief to the individuals who face discrimination in the society based on the different grounds. Ever since its enforcement by the EEOC, it became controversial, as many southern states had been in opposition of the same.
Learn more about affirmative action here:
https://brainly.com/question/8088645
#SPJ4
Where do I find excess Social Security and Tier 1 Rrta tax withheld?
Excess Social Security and Tier 1 Railroad Retirement Tax Act (RRTA) tax withheld can be found on your Form W-2. It is listed in box 4 (Social Security wages) and box 16 (RRTA compensation).
On your tax return, you can claim a refund of the excess Social Security and Tier 1 RRTA taxes withheld by entering the amount on line 71 of Form 1040 or line 44 of Form 1040A.
You may also be able to claim a refund of excess Social Security and Tier 1 RRTA taxes withheld if you had more than one job in the same year and the combined wages were more than the Social Security wage base. In that case, you will need to use Form 843 to claim the refund.
If you are filing a joint return, you may also be able to claim a refund of excess Social Security and Tier 1 RRTA taxes withheld for your spouse, as long as you both had jobs in the same year and the combined wages were more than the Social Security wage base. In that case, you will need to use Form 843 to claim the refund.
To learn more about joint return link is here
brainly.com/question/7611503
#SPJ4
Who nominates the justices to the Supreme Court?
The president of United States nominates the justices to the Supreme Court.
The supreme court is the apex court of United States i.e. the highest court in the land and the only part of federal judiciary required by the constitution. The president nominates judges of the supreme court, which is later discussed with the senate, and the justice is confirmed by the U.S. senate and hold their office for life tenure. The constitution wanted judiciary to be free from any judicial pressure that is why the nominations are made and after a complete discussion by panel of senate members judges are appointed.
To know more about "Supreme Court" visit-
brainly.com/question/1755400
#SPJ4
Two unrelated passengers on a small plane sued the pilot of the plane for injuries suffered during a rough landing after a sightseeing trip. They filed a negligence action in federal district court with the younger passenger, who had only minor injuries, claiming $5,000 in damages and the older passenger, whose injuries were life-threatening, claiming $95,000. The two passengers are citizens of the same state. The pilot is a citizen of another state. The pilot moved to dismiss the younger passenger's claim for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.
Should the court dismiss the younger passenger's claim?
Joinder of Parties
No, the court may not need to dismiss the younger passenger's claim for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction because the court can exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the claim.
In this case, the court can exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the younger passenger's claim because it shares a common nucleus of operative fact with the older passenger's claim, which falls within the court's original subject matter jurisdiction. However, supplemental jurisdiction is not allowed if a supplemental claim contaminates diversity or seeks less than $75,000 in damages. Since both passengers are from the same state, there is no contamination.
To know more about subject-matter jurisdiction, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30386872
#SPJ4
why does the constitution give implied powers to congress?
The "elastic" or implied powers clause enables Congress to enact laws that it deems "necessary and suitable" for the accomplishment of its listed duties.
This crucial clause serves as the foundation for numerous congressional authorities that have developed throughout time. Implied refers to something that is implied or inferred but is not expressly expressed. It has been argued that Congress has implied powers that aren't expressly specified, citing the constitutional provision that grants it the authority to pass any laws that are "necessary and appropriate."
The ability to create an army, declare war, and create money are a few instances of enumerated powers. The federal minimum wage is an example of an inferred power because the Constitution doesn't explicitly provide Congress that authority.
Learn more about constitution Visit: brainly.com/question/470736
#SPJ4
Munten Company's management derives four estimates relating to the possible tax benefit of its tax position. The amount that Munten should recognize relating to this potential tax benefit is the
The largest amount with a cumulative greater than 50 percent chance of realization is the amount that is to be recognized as being in relation to the potential tax benefit for Munten.
The tax benefit may be taken into interpretation as the benefit that an individual derives from the payment or nonpayment of taxes within the stipulated time of the previous year during the time of assessment being made in the context of the same. In the above situation, the largest amount is the amount to be considered for tax benefit.
Learn more about tax benefits here:
https://brainly.com/question/1581158
#SPJ4
The classic Millikan oil drop experiment was the first to obtain an accurate measurement of the charge on an electron. In it, oil drops were suspended against gravity by a vertical electric field. microscopeAssume the oil drop to be 1.40 μμm in radius and have a density of 939 kg/m33(a) Find the weight of the drop.(b) If the drop has a single excess electron, find the magnitude of the electric field strength needed to balance its weight.
A - The weight of the oil drop is 1.13× [tex]10^{-13}[/tex]3 N, B- the magnitude of the electric field strength needed to balance the weight of the oil drop is 7.05 x [tex]10^{-4}[/tex] N/C.
A- To find the weight of the oil drop, we can use the formula:
weight = density x volume x gravity
volume = (4/3)[tex]πr^3[/tex]
volume = (4/3)π[tex](1.40 μm)^3[/tex] = 1.091 x[tex]10^{-14} m^{3}[/tex]
weight = 939[tex]kg/m^{3}[/tex]x 1.091 x [tex]10^{-14}[/tex] [tex]m^{3}[/tex] x 9.81 [tex]m/s^{2}[/tex]= 1.13 x [tex]10^{-13}[/tex]N
Therefore, the weight of the oil drop is 1.13 x[tex]10^{-13}[/tex]N.
B- To find the magnitude of the electric field strength needed to balance the weight of the oil drop, we can use the formula:
electric field strength = weight / (number of excess electrons x charge on one electron)
electric field strength = 1.13 x[tex]10^{-13}[/tex]N / (1 x 1.602 x [tex]10^{-19}[/tex] C) = 7.05 x [tex]10^{4[/tex] N/C
Therefore, the magnitude of the electric field strength needed to balance the weight of the oil drop is 7.05 x [tex]10^{4}[/tex] N/C.
Learn more about electric field strength here:
https://brainly.com/question/28227168
#SPJ4
What 5 global companies have the highest number of employees?
The following list of five multinational corporations with the highest employee to revenue ratios includes:
$576 billion Walmart (WMT).Amazon (AMZN) is worth $486 billion.$443 billion Petro China (PTR).$394 billion Saudi Aramco (2222.SR).$388 billion is the value of Apple Inc.With nearly four million employees combined, Walmart and Amazon lead the retail industry as the largest employers worldwide. Statista reports that recent information has shown that the defense industry employs the most people globally.
With over 39% of the estimated total number of workers, the manufacturing industry is the largest employer, followed by the education sector with 22%. The majority of Indian workers are employed in the primary sector. The agricultural industry makes up the majority of the primary sector.
Learn more about employees Visit: brainly.com/question/27404382
#SPJ4
Laws are made to protect the public as a whole from the harmful acts of othersa)criminalb)civilc)internationald)military
Criminal laws are made to protect the public as a whole from the harmful acts of others.
So, option A is the correct answer.
Criminal laws regulate the criminal acts of the individuals, groups or associations. These criminal acts are addressed in the statutes. It can also be termed as penal laws because the criminal acts will lead to the punishment and fines.
It includes harmful or criminal acts such as theft, threatening a person about his/her body or property, robbery, defamation and many more.
Therefore, the correct answer is option A.
To know more about theft, click here: brainly.com/question/17224809
#SPJ4
_____ conditioning is a type of learning in which behavior is strengthened if followed by a reinforcer or diminished if followed by a punisher.
Operant conditioning is a type of learning in which behavior is strengthened if followed by a reinforcer or diminished if followed by a punisher.
Operant conditioning is a type of learning in which an individual modifies the occurrence and form of its own behavior due to the consequences of the behavior. It is based on the idea that behaviors that are reinforced or punished will be repeated or avoided respectively. Operant conditioning is often used by psychologists to help people change problematic behaviors and replace them with more desirable ones.
It works by providing positive and negative reinforcement, such as rewards and punishments, to encourage or discourage a particular behavior. Through this process, the individual learns to associate certain behaviors with desired outcomes, and thus modify their behavior accordingly.
It is based on the idea of positive and negative reinforcement. Positive reinforcement occurs when a behavior is strengthened by the presentation of a stimulus, such as a reward. Negative reinforcement occurs when a behavior is strengthened by the removal of an unpleasant stimulus.
To learn more about Negative reinforcement link is here
brainly.com/question/2488603
#SPJ4
