The sideview mirror in the conventional (bge) mirror setting is designed to observe the area next to your vehicles. It is correct.
A convention, in the meaning of a meeting, is a group of individuals who assemble at a predetermined location and time to talk or engage in some mutual interest. The most prevalent conventions are based on industry, career, and fandom. Trade conventions often focus on a certain sector or industry segment and include keynotes, vendor displays, and other knowledge and activities of interest to event organisers and attendees. Professional conferences focus on issues of interest as well as advancements in the profession. Such gatherings are typically conducted by societies or community dedicated to the advancement of the topic of interest.
Learn more about vehicles here
https://brainly.com/question/27981487
#SPJ4
Savio is convicted of robbery and is sentenced to home confinement for two years. He is required to wear a "continuously signaling" device around his wrist to limit his movement to a one-mile radius around his home. This scenario best exemplifies the use of _____ in home confinement.
Since Savio is convicted of robbery and is sentenced to home confinement for two years. This scenario best exemplifies the use of electronic monitoring in home confinement.
What is an electronic surveillance system?A criminal's whereabouts may always be verified thanks to the EMS technique and tool. Using this technology, local government authorities can place a range of restrictions on a criminal. In recent years, defendants have been managed by EMS before trials.
It should be taken into consideration that the surveillance method known as "electronic tagging" uses an electronic gadget that is attached to a person. Several nations use an electronic tag that is fastened to the person's ankle as part of their bond or probation conditions. It is used in the fields of immigration and healthcare as well.
Learn more about electronic monitoring device from
https://brainly.com/question/6605512
#SPJ1
See full question below
Savio is convicted of robbery and is sentenced to home confinement for two years. He is required to wear a "continuously signaling" device around his wrist to limit his movement to a one-mile radius around his home. This scenario best exemplifies the use of _____ in home confinement.
a. wiretapping
b. shock incarceration
c. electronic monitoring
d. multichanneling
What ethical considerations do human resource teams need to take into account
when developing harassment or affirmation action policies?
Being a company's moral compass, Human Resource teams who uphold high moral standards and try to create a fair workplace will keep employees' confidence and draw in new applicants.
Here are six HR ethics rules that businesses may adhere to in order to master the art of moral decision-making and establish themselves as a valued resource for their staff.
1) Maintain information privacy: HR professionals have access to a variety of sensitive data about employees, including social security numbers and medical records. You may relax knowing that the information about your firm is safe by making sure that paper documents and computer systems are secure.
2) Put diversity and inclusion policies into practice Nowadays, discussions regarding diversity frequently centre on efforts to recruit people of all races, classes, and genders.
3) Recognize potential conflict of interest
4) Act as an ethical HR leader: This entails having faith in your moral judgments and convincingly articulating them to staff members.
5)Prioritize your professional growth: HR is a topic that is continuously evolving, particularly as new discussions emerge and technology continues to transform how we work.
6) Be aware of the law: HR professionals must take decisive action as an organization's representative and hold violators of the law accountable.
What is a good HRM ethics example?
For instance, there are some rights that cannot be compromised, such as the right to privacy and the right to appropriate recompense for the labor performed.
Therefore maintaining ethics is very much important by human resource teams.
To learn more about human resource teams from the given link
https://brainly.com/question/13135400
#SPJ1
a court will admit parol evidence about a missing term in relation to any of the following circumstances except a) the written agreement does not contain the whole agreement. e) the missing term is a condition precedent to the written agreement. c) the missing term is part of a subsequent oral agreement. d) the missing term is part of a collateral agreement. b) the written agreement is unambiguous.
A court will admit parol evidence about a missing term in relation to any of the following circumstances except the written agreement is unambiguous.
Hence , option B is correct
What do you mean by parol?
Parol can be defined as a release of a prisoner on some conditions who has served part of a sentence as well as is under legal custody. It is generally given because of good behaviour. It helps them in reintegrating into society and humanising their life. It is the provisional or temporary release of a prisoner who has to agree to certain Norms like deposit , security before release. The parole rules as described in the Prisons Act, 2000 which are part of both legal and prisons law.
Hence, A court will admit parol evidence about a missing term in relation to any of the following circumstances except the written agreement is unambiguous.
Hence , option B is correct
To know about Parol from the given link
https://brainly.com/question/3520914
#SPJ4
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 was intended to meet which major objective?
In reaction to many accounting scandals in the early 2000s, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX), a federal law, was enacted in 2002 with backing from both political parties in Congress. Its goals were to enhance auditing and public transparency.
What is Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX)?Generally, The Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) is a federal law that was passed in 2002 with support from both the Democratic Party and the Republican Party in Congress.
In conclusion, Its purpose was to strengthen auditing practices and increase the amount of information that was made available to the public in response to a number of accounting scandals that occurred in the early 2000s.
Read more about Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX)
https://brainly.com/question/28484220
#SPJ1
it is easier to incriminate a young person for infringing on copyright rules under the dmca than to incriminate an older person.
Not always has the Digital Millennium Copyright Act been applied as intended. The DMCA has NOT been abused in this manner. Younger people are simpler to incriminate for violating copyright laws under the DMCA than older people are.
People have faced several threats since the internet's invention. Infringing on copyright is one of them. With only one click, anyone can browse millions of websites and post something on social media networks by editing someone else's original work—submitting research papers is a common example of this type of editing.
The infringement of someone's intellectual property is known as copyright (IP). It is another word for piracy or the theft of someone else's original work, particularly when the perpetrator reaps the rewards rather than the original author.
To know more about copyright click here:-
https://brainly.com/question/14704862
#SPJ4
at the majority of crime scenes, the execution of the search warrant involves the first step of knock, arrest, and seize. True or False
At the majority of murder scenes, the first step in executing a search warrant is to knock, grab, and seize. False.
A warrant is a financial security that authorizes the holder to purchase or sell shares, often the shares of the issuing corporation, at a fixed price known as the exercise price. Warrants and choices are similar in that both contractual financial instruments grant the holder special rights to purchase securities. Both are optional and have expiry dates. They differ primarily in that warrants are exclusively issued by particular number of educational and in certain technical features of their trading and execution. Warrants are typically linked to bonds or preferred shares as an enticement, allowing the seller to pay reduced interest rates or dividend. They can be used to increase the yield on the bond and make it more appealing to potential buyers.
Learn more about murder here
https://brainly.com/question/19271039
#SPJ4
7. Economists may disagree because they have
different
pre
TEMPER
a. hunches about the validity of alternative
theories.
Prestan
Milita
Quick Qu
b. judgments about the size of key parameters.
c. political philosophies about the goals of public
policy.
d. All of the above.
Economists may disagree because they have different all of the above. The correct option is D.
What do economists disagree about?There is widespread disagreement among economists about the appropriate size of government, the power of trade unions, the negative effects of unemployment and inflation, equitable income distribution, and whether or not a tax-cut policy is desirable. On these issues, economists are divided.
Economists may reach different scientific conclusions. To put it another way, economists may disagree on the validity of option positive theories about how the world really works.
Thus, the ideal selection is option D.
Learn more about economists here:
https://brainly.com/question/14299791
#SPJ1
Logic models are used to
A logic model is essentially a methodical and visual means to convey and communicate your knowledge of the connections between the tools you have at your disposal to run your program, the actions you want to take, and the modifications or outcomes you wish to accomplish.
What are Logic models?Generally, Logic models are explanations of the chain of causes and effects that are thought to lead to a certain conclusion that is of interest.
In conclusion, Although they may be presented in a narrative format, logic models more often than not take the form of graphical depictions of the "if-then" linkages that exist between the many components that lead to the end.
Read more about Logic models
https://brainly.com/question/17372961
#SPJ1
errigal just graduated from college. the cost of moving personal belongings to a first job site qualifies for the moving expense deduction.
Answer:meofrrje
Explanation:
ni pa i43r3t53
Question 2 (1 point)
Which of the following statements about malicious prosecution is true?
All U.S. courts permit a suit for wrongful civil proceedings.
The criminal proceeding must terminate in the plaintiff's favor in order for his
suit to be sustained.
O
It is the tort of causing someone to be prosecuted for a criminal act, knowing
that there was probable cause to believe that the plaintiff committed the crime.
The defendant must show that the plaintiff acted with some purpose other than
bringing the guilty to justice.
A mere complaint to the authorities is sufficient to establish the tort.
Question 3 (1 point)
Answer:
true because is True you say
Quebec has held two referendums – public votes – on the question of some form of sovereignty or political separation from Canada, the first in 1980 and the 2nd was in 1995. Discuss the differences between the two referendums.
Quebec has held two referendums – public votes – on the question of some form of sovereignty or political separation from Canada
The failure of the Meech Lake Accord and the Charlottetown Accord left big uncertainty approximately the constitutional future of Canada.
The primary signal was a dramatic exchange within the political landscape of the residence of Commons following the 1993 election. The innovative Conservative birthday party, related to former top Minister Brian Mulroney and the failed accords, changed into clearly wiped out.
Even as the federalist Liberals below Jean Chrétien received a majority, the competition was fractured along regional lines, between the western-based Reform birthday celebration of Canada and the avowedly separatist Bloc Québécois, which shaped the legitimate competition.
Learn more about sovereignty https://brainly.com/question/7793449
#SPJ1
Read the following article by Sykes and Matza on Techniques of Neutralization. Then, respond to the following question:
How do Sykes and Matza’s techniques of neutralization allow crime to occur? Provide an (anonymous, i.e., do not identify someone by name) example of someone that you know personally or a case that has been well reported in the media where neutralizations are linked to crime or other problem behavior.
Sykes and Matze called these circumstances techniques of neutralization because, by pursuing them, offenders were able to mentally clean or neutralize their crimes and strain themselves into that they aren't really criminals.
What are techniques?Skill is the ability to carry out a task with discovered results. The knowledge base technique is any systematic way of acquiring information about a scientific nature. Ability to treat such details or use such social movement, and good piano skillfulness.
Sykes and Matze’s techniques of neutralization allow crime to occur justifications techniques of neutralization because, by pursuing them, offenders were able to mentally
Therefore, Sykes and Matze called these justifications techniques of neutralization
Learn more about techniques here:
https://brainly.com/question/17130704
#SPJ1
at the defendant's trial for stealing an automobile, the defendant called a character witness who testified that the defendant had an excellent reputation for honesty. in rebuttal, the prosecutor calls another witness to testify that he recently saw the defendant cheat on a college examination. the prosecution witness's testimony should be
The prosecution witness's testimony should be:
The prosecution witness's testimony should be excluded, because the defendant's cheating can be inquired into only on cross-examination of the defendant's witness.
What do you mean by cross examination?
The proper examination and questioning of a witness by the adverse party is known as cross-examination. It gives the opposing party a chance to determine the weaknesses of a witness's testimony.
The main aim of cross examination is to strengthen an individual's case. The scope of cross-examination is confirming the witness's testimony, knowledge, and credibility
Rules of Cross-Examination
Asking Questions Only.Inclusion of New Fact Per Question.Break questions into a Series of Logical ProgressionsHence ,The prosecution witness's testimony should be excluded, because the defendant's cheating can be inquired into only on cross-examination of the defendant's witness.
To know more about Cross examination from the given link
https://brainly.com/question/28114975
#SPJ4
Discuss the following question (300 word minimum)...
This Ted Talk was given 4 years ago. We are currently seeing the issues that can arise from countries threatening nuclear war (Russia's invasion of Ukraine). Don't forget, Ukraine was part of the Soviet Union, and Ukraine became the world's third largest possessor of nuclear weapons from the fall of the Soviet Union. As a result, Ukraine agreed to become a Non Nuclear Weapon State giving up all of their 1,900+ nuclear weapons.
Why is important for the U.S. to monitor WMDs throughout the world? The U.S. has WMDs; so, should we have the authority to tell other countries that they can't have them? Do you think Russia would have invaded Ukraine if they had not agreed to give up their nuclear arsenal almost 28 years ago?
In the past, countries that have various proliferation capabilities have done so primarily to stave off challenges to regional security and secondarily to discourage American engagement.
A nation's decision to develop WMD is exclusively dependent on the threat that other nations pose to that nation. No other nation may meddle in it. However, the creation of WMD is resisted in order to preserve international harmony and prevent further conflicts.
What are WMDs?A chemical, radiological, biological, nuclear, or other weapon that have the potential to kill many people, seriously injure them or significantly disrupt both man-made and natural structures, as well as the biosphere, is considered a weapon of mass destruction.
China, France, India, North Korea, Pakistan, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States are the eight countries.
Most are in Russia's arsenal, followed by those of the United States.
Learn more about WMDs, from:
brainly.com/question/14586437
#SPJ1
Can you remember the four (4) traditional rules of statutory interpretation?
Answer:
There are four Rules of Statutory Interpretation, these are (1) the literal rule, (2) the golden rule, (3) the mischief rule and (4) the purposive approach.
before the weeks v united states which of the following was not a consequence for the police when they unconstitutionally seized evidence
Evidence excluded at trial was not a consequence for the police when they unconstitutionally seized evidence. The exclusionary rule bars the government from using the majority of evidence gathered in violation of the United States Constitution.
Weeks is subject to the Fourth Amendment prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures, and the evidence seized as a result must be excluded from his prosecution. The Court ruled unanimously that the seizure of items from Weeks' home directly violated his constitutional rights.
Here is the complete question-
Before the Weeks v. United States, which of the following was not a consequence for police when the unconstitutionally seized evidence?
a. Civil suits for the return of property.
b. Civil suits for damages.
c. Internal administrative discipline.
d. Evidence excluded at trial.
Learn more on evidence -
https://brainly.com/question/9306796
#SPJ4
The signs of being impaired are always obvious true or false?
Answer:
Explanation:False
The statement is false as signs of impairment may not always be obvious and can vary depending on the individual and substance consumed.
Sometimes the symptoms of impairment are subtle. While some actions or physical characteristics, such as slurred speech, clumsy movements or bloodshot eyes, can indicate impairment not all symptoms are immediately apparent. It may be more difficult to identify some people's impairments because they can partially conceal or mask them.
The substance consumed, a person's tolerance and other factors can all affect how impairment appears. It is crucial to understand that impairment can have an impact on cognitive function, judgment and coordination even when there are no overt symptoms. Therefore, determining someone's impairment solely based on outward symptoms may not always be accurate.
learn more about signs of impairment here
brainly.com/question/31567687
#SPJ2
What is democracy promotion
Answer:
ExplDemocracy promotion, which can also be referred to as democracy assistance, democracy support, or democracy building, is a strand of foreign policy adopted by governments and international organizations that seek to support the spread of democracy as a political regime around the world.
To check the area on the right side of your vehicle, you should:
To check the area on the right side of your vehicle, you should: Turn your chin to your shoulder and glance towards the back out of the right side rear window.
What is a blind spot?A blind spot can be defined as an area or portion to either side of a vehicle, as well as the back (rear end) of a vehicle that is typically outside the field of vision of a driver, especially because it is not visible in the rear view mirror.
As a good driver, the most appropriate and acceptable ways to check the area on the right side of your vehicle is by turning your chin to your shoulder and then glance towards the blind spot through the right side rear window.
In conclusion, it is very wrong, inappropriate and unacceptable to glance towards the blind spot through your side window.
Read more on good blind spot here: https://brainly.com/question/17120761
#SPJ1
Complete Question:
To check the area on the right side of your vehicle, you should:
Look in the interior rear-view mirror.
Turn your chin to your shoulder and glance towards the back out of the right side rear window.
Turn your chin to your shoulder and glance towards the back out the driver's side window.
Look in the exterior right side rear-view mirror.
the common law system is built on precedent. what does this mean? choices the decisions made by previous congresses influence current legislation. codes that were written for specific issues are reevaluated over time. previous administrative decisions are treated as law. previous court decisions are applied to current and future cases.
Miranda v. arizona if we are all charged with knowing the law, how could the court find that miranda needed to be informed of his rights by the state? could miranda be tried again for the same crime? what justification would the court have in imposing such a burden on the police? would they not be practicing law by giving such legal advice? was excluding the evidence (the confession) the only sanction available to the u.s. supreme court? can you think of some other sanctions that would still allow such evidence to be used but protect the innocent person who might be subjected to such treatment.
Miranda vs . Arizona occurred in 1996. the In this the Supreme Court ruled that detained criminal suspects before police questioning, must be properly informed of their constitutional right to an attorney and against self-incrimination.
Explain Miranda vs Arizona case.
In this case it was established that the Police need to make you aware about your Miranda Rights after an arrest and before questioning. It was established under 5 and 6 amendments of the US constitution.
It has provided detainees with the right to not to self incriminate along with the right to humanise their life.In the case of Miranda, he was tried and convicted again, without using the confession against him.In the final Outcome his conviction was overturned.This was the final result of the Miranda vs Arizona case.
To know more about Miranda vs Arizona from the given link
https://brainly.com/question/13483624
#SPJ4
18. ellen was injured when she was struck by a car driven by matthew. at the time, ellen was crossing the street and matthew entered the intersection and not paying attention to the crosswalk while he was on the telephone, but the light was still yellow. ellen sustained substantial injuries and sued matthew for negligence. at trial, matthew testified that ellen caused the accident because ellen was crossing the street while the light was still yellow in matthew's favor. which of the following is matthew's best defense? a. superseding negligence of ellen. b. strict liability against jennifer. c. contributory negligence of ellen. d. none of the above.
Answer: c. contributory negligence of Ellen.
Explanation:
In what situations would a court be likely to award a quasi-contract?.
There are two situations at which a court likely to award a quasi contract .
When the unjust enrichment is a relatively insignificant amount of moneyIf the defendant was unjustly enriched and played a part in deceiving the plaintiffA quasi-contract is a retroactive agreement between two parties without any prior obligation to each other. It is created by judges to fix situations where one party gets something at the expense of the other party.
The purpose of a quasi-contract is to achieve a fair result in situations where one party has an advantage over the other. The defendant, the party that acquired the property, must pay the plaintiff, the damaged party, a refund to cover the value of the goods.
A quasi-contract is also called an implied
contract.
Considering the example above, the person who ordered and paid for the pizza has every right to claim payment from the person who actually received the pizza. The former is the plaintiff and the latter is the defendant.
Under the jurisdiction of common law, quasi-contracts arose in the Middle Ages under the form of an act known in Latin as indebitatus assumpsit.
This rule of law was the court's way of making one party pay the other as if a contract agreement already existed between the parties. To learn more about qucsi contract, refer :
https://brainly.com/question/984979
#SPJ4
a law office interviews paralegals for 10 openings. there are 15 paralegals with two years of experience and 24 paralegals with one year of experience. how many combinations of six paralegals with two years of experience and four paralegals with one year of experience are possible?
The paralegals possible for this would be 19,399,380
First we find how many combinations of 6 out of 15 and 4 out of 19 we can make.
15C6 = 5005
19C4 = 3876.
Using the counting principle.
5005 x 3876 = 19,399,380
What do you mean by paralegal?
They are usually appointed by law officers in order to assist them and perform several tasks.
Paralegal duties revolve around legal documents, research, interviewing clients and witnesses and visiting courts.
Hence, The paralegals possible for this would be 19,399,380
To know more about Paralegal from the given link
https://brainly.com/question/25507890
#SPJ4
Is home life affected by drug addiction?
A. Yes, it's always affected.
B. No, it's not affected.
C. Only if you don't know how to manage your addiction.
Yes, home life is always affected by drug addiction. Thus, option A. "Yes, it's always affected" is correct.
Addiction to drugs can have an effective impact on family life. Addicts may disregard their responsibilities, use drugs more frequently, and exhibit irritability and unpredictable behavior. Conflict with family members, money issues, and even physical abuse can result from this.
Children may additionally suffer harm as a result of drug addiction. Violence, neglect, and other forms of abuse could be experienced by the children of addicts. Additionally, they could be required to shoulder greater responsibilities at home, which can be demanding and exhausting.
Therefore, the correct option is A.
Learn more about drug addiction, here:
https://brainly.com/question/31930020
#SPJ5
the defendant, an avid fan of his hometown football team, shot at the leg of a star player for a rival team, intending to injure the player's leg enough to hospitalize him for a few weeks, but not to kill him. the player died of loss of blood. what is the most serious offense of which the defendant could be properly convicted?
The defendant could be properly convicted of Murder or to be specific Involuntary manslaughter
What do you mean by murder?
It can be defined as the crime of intentionally killing a person.In cases like these, the court either punishes the killer with either the death penalty or life imprisonment. The case of death of a star player was ultimately linked to blood loss caused by a bullet shot.
Therefore manslaughter which can be further defined as the killing of a person without malice aforethought but with either the intention to commit an unlawful act that leads to an unintended death has committed by the defendant which led to charges of murder.
Hence, The defendant could be properly convicted of Murder or to be specific Involuntary manslaughter
To learn more about Murder from the given link
https://brainly.com/question/28478113
#SPJ4
peer pressure __in why some teens get in a car with an impaired driver?
Answer: Some kids are a bad influence
Explanation: According to my studies, many teenagers build up a ball of rage inside their head. As a result, they peer pressure poor innocent children to feel happy. This is called a pyschopath.
difference did mccabe and fajardo find between accredited and non-accredited law enforcement agencies
This study provides a comparison of specific agency characteristics between accredited and nonaccredited law-enforcement agencies.
An article on accreditation that was investigated was named, "Law enforcement agencies: A public correlation of accredited versus non accredited organizations."
(McCabe and Fajardo, 2010). This article comes according to another viewpoint, that point of view being from the schooling field rather than coming from a law enforcement organization.
In the theoretical, it is examined that most past compositions have been about "only conversation of license or observational assessments of officials' discernments on the license process." (McCabe and Fajardo, 2010) The review searched out to give a more top to bottom examination of accredited organizations instead of non-accredited offices.
The review zeroed in on an exploration approach of information gathered from the "LawEnforcement The executives and Regulatory Measurements, 1993: Information for Individual State furthermore, Neighborhood Offices with At least 100 Officials (LEMAS) and CALEA's April 1998 rundown of accredited organizations." The five factors audited were:
Field preparing hours;
Least instructive prerequisites for beginning officials;
Strategy for drug-testing-sworn police candidates;
The activity of an extraordinary medication unit; and
The activity of an extraordinary kid misuse unit.
to know more about the accreditation click here:
https://brainly.com/question/22560558
#SPJ4
This study provides a comparison of specific agency characteristics between accredited and nonaccredited law-enforcement agencies.
An article on accreditation that was investigated was named, "Law enforcement agencies: A public correlation of accredited versus non accredited organizations."
(McCabe and Fajardo, 2010). This article comes according to another viewpoint, that point of view being from the schooling field rather than coming from a law enforcement organization.
In the theoretical, it is examined that most past compositions have been about "only conversation of license or observational assessments of officials' discernments on the license process." (McCabe and Fajardo, 2010) The review searched out to give a more top to bottom examination of accredited organizations instead of non-accredited offices.
The review zeroed in on an exploration approach of information gathered from the "LawEnforcement The executives and Regulatory Measurements, 1993: Information for Individual State furthermore, Neighborhood Offices with At least 100 Officials (LEMAS) and CALEA's April 1998 rundown of accredited organizations." The five factors audited were:
Field preparing hours;
Least instructive prerequisites for beginning officials;
Strategy for drug-testing-sworn police candidates;
The activity of an extraordinary medication unit; and
The activity of an extraordinary kid misuse unit.
to know more about the accreditation click here:
brainly.com/question/22560558
#SPJ4
in eby, the supreme court stated allowing contractors to make a claim against architects would do which of the following:
In eby, the Court Decided that enabling contractors to sue architects would accomplish which of the following: produce a detrimental impact on the architect's impartiality or legal responsibility to the owner.
A court is any person or institution, frequently a government institution, with the jurisdiction to arbitrate legal disagreements between parties and administer justice in civil, penal, and administrative in conformity with the rule of law. Courts are the central mechanism of conflict resolution in both civil and common law legal systems, and it is widely assumed that everyone has the opportunity to bring their claim before such a court. Similarly, persons accused of a crime have the opportunity to provide a defense in court. The judiciary is the judicial system that interprets and executes the law. A venue is the location of a court.
learn more about legal responsibility here
https://brainly.com/question/27883274
#SPJ4
Merck, in fact, epitomizes the ideological nature--the pragmatic idealism--of highly visionary companies. Our research showed that a fundamental element in the "ticking clock" of a visionary company is a core ideology--core values and a sense of purpose beyond just making money--that guides and inspires people throughout the organization and remains relatively fixed for long periods of time.References:Collins, J. C.,
Because the student properly cited (in--text) the source of the quote relating to research, and also included the full details of the author in the bibliography, the issue of plagiarism, therefore, is nullified.
What is plagiarism?The act of copying another person's work without acknowledging them, citing them properly or including their names in the bibliography of the work is called plagiarism.
One of the ways to correct the above or avoid it altogether is to ensure that one's work is as original as possible. All citations must be noted that properly acknowledged according to the source form from which it came.
Learn more about plagiarism:
https://brainly.com/question/24405302
#SPJ1
Full Question:
Original Source Material
Merck, in fact, epitomizes the ideological nature--the pragmatic idealism--of highly visionary companies. Our research showed that a fundamental element in the "ticking clock" of a visionary company is a core ideology--core values and a sense of purpose beyond just making money--that guides and inspires people throughout the organization and remains relatively fixed for long periods of time.
References:
Collins, J. C., & Porras, J. I. (2002). Built to last: Successful habits of visionary companies. New York, NY: Harper Paperbacks.
Student Source Material
Research conducted by Collins and Porras (2002) highlights the importance of establishing and committing to an ideology comprised of two parts: (1) core values; (2) a core purpose. In my personal experience it seems easier to define a core ideology than to live it consistently.
References:
Collins, J. C., & Porras, J. I. (2002). Built to last: Successful habits of visionary companies. New York, NY: Harper Paperbacks.
Which of the following is true for the Student Version above?
Word-for-Word plagiarismParaphrasing plagiarismThis is not plagiarismHints: Item 2
