Why does Nora refuse to let her children see her at the end of Act 1?
In Act 1 of "A Doll's House," Nora refuses to let her children see her because she fears that they will be traumatized by the upheaval that is about to happen in her life.
She has just realized that her marriage is based on a lie and that she has been living a superficial and empty existence. She is beginning to understand that she has been living according to society's expectations rather than her own desires and needs. Nora also realizes that she has been treated as a possession by her husband Torvald and has never been seen or valued for who she really is. She is afraid that her children will witness her emotional turmoil and suffer as a result. She wants to protect them from the harsh realities of life and shield them from the pain that she is experiencing. Furthermore, Nora is also trying to preserve the illusion of the perfect family that she has created. She wants her children to remember her as a loving and devoted mother who always put their needs first. By hiding her true feelings from them, she hopes to maintain this image and spare them the truth. Overall, Nora's refusal to let her children see her at the end of Act 1 is motivated by a desire to protect them from the truth and preserve the image of the perfect family that she has created.
Learn more about A Doll's House here:
https://brainly.com/question/17105961
#SPJ11
Amanda was agitated because she had mistakenly torn a dusty rug to use as a blanket. She shuddered at the thought that she had slept under it. She was tired and upset and had wanted to rest after she had separated from her fellow campers. Luckily, she had somehow found this unoccupied cabin. As she opened the door, she saw a table set with pieces of roasted chicken, bread, butter, cheese, and some fruits. Amanda's stomach growled at the sight of such a lavish feast, and immediately entered and began to gulp down the food, but then she suddenly heard voices in the distance. She looked for a place to hide, but she was in a dilemma because there were no good hiding places; she would have to hide behind the curtains or go back to the room she had slept in. As the voices came closer, they suddenly sounded familiar, and she was thrilled when she saw her friends. 1 Which word would best replace lavish in the passage? A. mysterious B. bountiful C. moderate D. disgusting
The context clues show that the word that would best replace lavish in the passage is B. bountiful
What are context clues?Also called visual indices, these words are described or defined by other words that appear in the same sentence.
This means that they help to infer the meaning of unknown words with the help of nearby words, this in order to increase vocabulary and help interpret and understand a message or concept.
In conclusion, the correct option is B.
Learn more about context clues on
https://brainly.com/question/11247029
#SPJ1
cats or dogs?
explanation required.
Cats. But why?
Cats are really good pets to keep. Once trained, they seem to be friends with their owner. They love being petted around, but, sometimes when annoyed, they may not act the same. Cats can be a good option to keep, because if you are bored, you always have them on your back. Owning a cat can bring unconditional love and companionship to your life. According to science, if you spend 15 – 30 minutes a day petting, cuddling, and playing with your cat, your overall mood can be boosted. Cats have also been known to help with loneliness, anxiety, depression, and more. If you're looking for a pet that requires a little less attention, a cat might be your best bet. Cats can sense how people are feeling, so your cat actually can tell when you're sad. Cats can definitely sense when you are sad because they are highly attuned to your normal behaviors and moods, and if there is a change, they sense it. Cats speak about your personality as well. If you have a kitten, you are warm-hearted. If you have an angry cat, you are pretty strict and so on.
Dogs. But why?
Spending just 15-30 minutes with your dog can help you feel more calm and relaxed, reducing stress and increasing happiness. Dog owners have a much higher rate of recovery from being sick than non-dog owners. In fact, humans with pooches who suffer from heart attacks are twice as likely to fully recover as those without! Your dog requires daily exercise, and so do you! Dog owners carry the responsibility of playing with and working their dogs, so it only makes sense that dog people tend to be more active. They reduce stress, anxiety, and depression, ease loneliness, encourage exercise and playfulness, and even improve your cardiovascular health. They can increase opportunities to exercise, get outside, and socialize. Regular walking or playing with pets can decrease blood pressure, cholesterol levels, and triglyceride levels. Dogs can help manage loneliness and depression by giving us companionship too! Most importantly, the breed of dog you have, speaks a lot about your personality. If you have a husky, you might be considered generous. If you have a Pomerian, you might be a pretty busy and calm person.
Thank you! :)
Read this excerpt from "Gravity" by Judith Ortiz Cofer:
I knew that my rebel disguise worried my parents, but we had an unspoken agreement we all understood would be revoked if they objected too much to my hippie clothes and loud music. By day I looked and acted like a good Catholic girl, wearing my Queen of Heaven High School uniform of gray plaid wool, penny-loafers with socks, hair in a braid, the whole bit. After school I became whoever and whatever I wanted.
What is the best example of cultural conflict in the excerpt?
Answer:
The best example of cultural conflict in the excerpt is C.
Explanation:
Elenita's hippie clothes versus her school uniform. This is because the conflict is between Elenita's desire to express herself through her fashion choices as a "rebel" and her Catholic school's requirement for her to wear a uniform. This conflict highlights the tension between individual expression and conformity to cultural norms. The other options are not as directly related to cultural conflict in this specific passage.
Answer: The Answer is A) Elenita versus her parent's traditional values
Explanation: It just is
The theme of a story can be summed up in one word.
True
False
Answer:
False. While some stories may have a theme that can be succinctly captured in one word, such as "love" or "betrayal," most themes are more complex and require a more nuanced understanding of the story's characters, plot, and setting. Themes are the underlying messages or ideas that the author seeks to convey through the story, and they can encompass a range of emotions, values, and issues. For example, the theme of "To Kill a Mockingbird" by Harper Lee could be described as "prejudice," but it also touches on broader themes such as justice, morality, and the loss of innocence. Therefore, it is not always accurate to summarize a story's theme in just one word.
Explanation:
i hope this helps:)
Answer:
False.
While a theme can be summarized in a word or phrase, it typically requires a more nuanced and detailed description to fully capture the underlying message or lesson of a story. Themes often relate to broader topics such as love, power, justice, or identity, and may involve complex ideas or issues that require deeper exploration and analysis.
rights reserved.
16
Select the correct answer.
What information is emphasized in the passage but absent in the artwork?
O A. Helena's well-mannered nature
Helena's respect for the King
Helena's lack of wealth and status
O D. Helena's importance to the story
B.
C.
0
The information that is emphasized in the passage but absent in the artwork is option is option C: Helena's lack of wealth and status.
What is the artwork?Literary artwork is a translation, understanding, transmutation of classical text from speech system to another signs plan. It is a perception brand, interpretation and translation of allure original works, not expected duplication but as a form of art object.
Therefore, The story given in the passage, mentions that Helena's sole wealth was only made up of small of her father's prescriptions and that she was in a lower authority or position than Bertram, who was the offspring of a Countess.
Learn more about wealth from
https://brainly.com/question/28126096
#SPJ1
see text below
"All's Well That Ends Well"
from Beautiful Stories from Shakespeare by E. Nesbit (excerpt)
(1) In the year thirteen hundred and something, the Countess of Rousillon was unhappy in her palace near the Pyrenees. She had lost her husband, and the King of France had summoned her son Bertram to Paris, hundreds of miles away.
(2) Bertram was a pretty youth with curling hair, finely arched eyebrows, and eyes as keen as a hawk's. He was as proud as ignorance could make him, and would be with a face like truth itself to gain a selfish end. But a pretty youth is a pretty youth, and Helena was in love with him.
(3) Helena was the daughter of a great doctor who had died in the service of the Count of Rousillon. Her sole fortune consisted in a few of her father's prescriptions.
(4) When Bertram had gone, Helena's forlom look was noticed by the Countess, who told her that she was exactly the same to her as her own child. Tears then gathered in Helena's eyes, for she felt that the Countess made Bertram seem like a brother whom she could never marry. The Countess guessed her secret forthwith, and Helena confessed that Bertram was to her as the sun is to the day.
16
Select the correct answer,
What information is emphasized in the passage but absent in the artwork?
A. Helena's well-mannered nature
Fights reserved.
OB.
Helena's respect for the King
OC
Helena's lack of wealth and status
OD.
Helena's importance to the story
summary about o brother where art thou
"O Brother, Where Art Thou?" is a 2000 comedy-drama film directed by Joel and Ethan Coen, loosely based on Homer's epic poem, "The Odyssey."
The film follows three convicts, Ulysses Everett McGill, Delmar O'Donnell, and Pete Hogwallop, who escape from a Mississippi chain gang and embark on a journey to find a treasure Ulysses claims to have buried before his incarceration. Along the way, they encounter a number of colorful characters and obstacles, including a cyclops-like Bible salesman, a corrupt politician, and a flood.
The film features a soundtrack of traditional American folk, bluegrass, and gospel music and stars George Clooney, John Turturro, and Tim Blake Nelson in the lead roles. The film was a critical and commercial success, receiving praise for its performances, cinematography, and music.
-----------The given question is incomplete, the complete question is:
"Write a short summary about O Brother, Where Art Thou?"-----------
To know more about Where Art Thou, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/30387852
#SPJ1
How does Gwendolen's assessment of her father's status within his family stand in contrast to conventional Victorian notions of gender?
Answer:
Gwendolen's belief that her father's status is determined by her mother's social standing challenges the traditional Victorian idea that men are the sole providers and decision-makers in the family. It suggests that gender is not the only factor that determines one's place in society, but rather that social standing and reputation also play a significant role.
Explanation:
Gwendolen's belief that her father's status is determined by her mother's social standing challenges the traditional Victorian idea that men are the sole providers and decision-makers in the family. It suggests that gender is not the only factor that determines one's place in society, but rather that social standing and reputation also play a significant role.
Question 2 of 5
According to the "Equal Pay Bill" letter, what will happen if businesses are
forced to pay women the same as they pay men?
A. The cost of goods and services will increase.
B. The quality of work will decrease.
C. The government will raise the minimum wage.
D. Men will make less money.
Match each example of characterization with the correct type.
Which words could be changed into verbs when the suffix -ize is used with them?
Select all that apply.
analysis
priority
Both "analysis" and "priority" can be changed into verbs when the suffix -ize is used with them. The verbs would be "analyze" and "prioritize", respectively.
a detailed examination of anything complex in order to understand its nature or to determine its essential features : a thorough study. doing a careful analysis of the problem. : a statement of such an examination.
the quality or state of coming before another in time or importance. : a condition of being given attention before others. this project has top priority.
TO KNOW MORE ABOUT suffix -ize CLICK THIS LINK -
brainly.com/question/24260333
#SPJ11
Things got worse, though, and they finally backed __ of their agreement
The correct term to use is "out" so that the sentence reads: "Things got worse, though, and they finally backed out of their agreement."
1. "Things got worse" - This is an independent clause that contains a subject ("Things") and a verb ("got"), forming a complete thought.
2. "though" - This is a conjunction used to link the two independent clauses and to show a contrast between them.
3. "and" - This is another conjunction, which is used to connect the two parts of the second independent clause.
4. "they finally backed out of their agreement" - This is the second independent clause that also contains a subject ("they") and a verb ("backed out"). The phrasal verb "backed out" means to withdraw from a commitment or promise. The preposition "of" is used to show the relationship between the action (backing out) and the object (their agreement).
To summarize, the sentence is a compound sentence, made up of two independent clauses joined by conjunctions. The phrasal verb "backed out" combined with the preposition "of" conveys the idea that due to the worsening situation, the individuals involved decided to withdraw from their previously made agreement. The overall sentence structure and choice of terms help to convey this meaning clearly and concisely.
To learn more about phrasal verb, refer:-
https://brainly.com/question/30847852
#SPJ11
How did Dr. Rank announce his "death?"
Dr. Rank, a character in Henrik Ibsen's play "A Doll's House," announces his impending "death" in a symbolic and discreet manner. Aware of his deteriorating health due to a terminal illness, Dr. Rank chooses to inform his close friends Nora and Torvald Helmer without causing distress or drawing attention to himself. He does so by leaving a calling card with a black cross on it, representing the traditional symbol of death. This black cross serves as a metaphor for his imminent demise and allows him to communicate the news in a subtle, yet clear manner.
By using this approach, Dr. Rank ensures that he maintains a sense of decorum and respect for his friends' feelings. The symbolic gesture also highlights the theme of deception and hidden truths that permeates the play, as characters grapple with the complexities of their relationships and societal expectations. In summary, Dr. Rank's announcement of his "death" through a black cross on a calling card demonstrates his desire for discretion, sensitivity, and an adherence to social conventions.
TO KNOW MORE ABOUT A Doll's House CLICK THIS LINK -
brainly.com/question/12446066
#SPJ11
The size of the net is hung at _____ inches on the ends, and _____ inches in the middle?
a
36, 34
b
34, 36
c
34, 34
d
36, 36
please hurry and answer
The size of the net is hung at 36 inches on the ends, and 34 inches in the middle. So the option a is correct.
The ends of the net are suspended symmetrically at 36 inches from the ground, while the center is strung at 34 inches. This causes the middle of the net to be lower than the sides, giving the net an arc-like form.
In sports like volleyball or badminton, this style of hanging is frequently employed because it enables players to perform shots or passes that would be otherwise impossible if the net were strung straight across.
The higher sides enable more powerful shots because the ball doesn't need to travel as far through the air, while the lower midsection helps keep the ball in play for longer. So the option a is correct.
To learn more about symmetrically link is here
brainly.com/question/1103437
#SPJ1
limerick poem ideas?
Answer:
A limerick about a funny encounter with a mischievous cat who steals socks from the neighborhood.There once was a cat named Jack,
Who snuck into houses and didn't lack,
He'd swipe all the socks,
From doors left ajar or unlocked,
Till his stash was a sock-filled sack!A limerick about a clumsy chef who tries to bake a cake but ends up making a mess in the kitchen.A chef with a passion to bake,
Tried a cake with layers and glaze to make,
But the eggs went all over,
Flour coated the rover,
And frosting was spread by mistake!A limerick about a sneezing elephant who causes chaos at the zoo.An elephant named Louie, so grand,
With a trunk that was quite unplanned,
He would sneeze with a roar,
And the zoo would explore,
As he blew animals across the land!A limerick about a misadventure of a clumsy astronaut who gets lost in space.An astronaut named Ted, oh so keen,
Went on a space mission, it seemed serene,
But he tripped on a star,
And flew off too far,
Now he's lost in the galaxy unseen!A limerick about a superhero with an unconventional power of super-hiccup.A hero named Hiccup, they say,
Had a power that came into play,
With a hiccup so strong,
Things would go all wrong,
As villains flew in dismay!Note: Limericks are light-hearted, humorous poems with a distinctive rhythm and structure. They typically consist of five lines with a strict rhyme scheme (AABBA) and have a sing-song quality. These are just some ideas, and you can tailor your limerick to your liking and creativity!
Explanation:
Which revisions for the underlined phrase make the writing more precise? Check all that apply
By changing the underlined phrase to either revisions for the underlined phrase precise generated compelling speeches or by making meaningful speeches, the writing can be made clearer. The correct answer is B. powerful speeches crafted.
Speeches are the capacity to communicate sentiments and thoughts through the use of language that is structured in a way that is easily understood by the audience.
The speech will be more specific if the aforementioned words—created strong speeches, constructed important speeches—are revised. Avoiding ambiguity and wordiness, precise language consists of employing words in an exact and vivid manner. When the situation permits, words like "nice," "great," "give," "use," or "make" should be swapped out with ones that are more precise the paragraph that is emphasised, "wrote great speeches."
Complete question:
Which revisions for the underlined phrase make the writing more precise? Check all that apply
A. gave nice speeches created
B. powerful speeches crafted
C. meaningful speeches used
D. important speeches said beautiful speeches
To know more about Speeches visit:
https://brainly.com/question/27587034
#SPJ4
In the first place, to make the poem or the novel the central concern of literary criticism has appeared to mean cutting it loose from its author and from the author’s particular hopes, fears, interests, conflicts, etc. A criticism so limited may seem bloodless and hollow.
In the second place, to emphasize the work seems to involve severing it from those who actually read it, and this severance may seem drastic and therefore disastrous. After all, literature is written to be read.
The formalist critic knows as well as anyone that poems and plays and novels are written as expressions of particular personalities and are written from all sorts of motives–for money, from a desire to express oneself, for the sake of a cause, etc. Moreover, the formalist critic knows as well as anyone that literary works are merely potential until they are read–that is, that they are re-created in the minds of actual readers, who vary enormously in their capabilities, their interests, their prejudices, their ideas. But the formalist critic is concerned primarily with the work itself. Speculation on the mental processes of the author takes the critic away from the work into biography and psychology. Such studies describe the process of composition, not the structure of the thing composed.
On the other hand, exploration of the various readings which the work has received also takes the critic away from the work into psychology and the history of taste. But such work, valuable and necessary as it may be, is to be distinguished from a criticism of the work itself. The formalist critic makes two assumptions: (1) that the relevant part of the author’s intention is what the author actually put into the work–that is, the critic assumes that the author’s intention as realized is the "intention" that counts. And (2) the formalist critic assumes an ideal reader–that is, instead of focusing on the varying spectrum of possible readings, the critic attempts to find a central point of reference from which to focus on the structure of the poem or novel.
There is no ideal reader, of course. But for the purpose of focusing on the poem rather than on the critic’s own reactions, it is a defensible strategy. (The alternatives are desperate: Either we say that one person’s reading is as good as another’s, and thus deny the possibility of any standard reading, or else we take the lowest common denominator of the various readings that have been made–that is, we frankly move from literary criticism into social psychology. To propose taking a consensus of the opinions of "qualified" readers is simply to split the ideal reader into a group of ideal readers.) As consequences of the distinction just referred to, the formalist critic rejects two popular tests for literary value. The first proves the value of the work from the author’s "sincerity" (or the intensity of the author’s feelings as he or she composed it). We discount also such tests as the intensity of the critic’s reaction.
A literary work is a document and as a document can be analyzed in terms of the forces that have produced it, or it may be manipulated as a force in its own right. It mirrors the past, it may influence the future. These facts it would be futile to deny, and I know of no critic who does deny them. But the reduction of a work of literature to its causes does not constitute literary criticism; nor does an estimate of its effects. Good literature is more than effective rhetoric applied to true ideas–even if we could agree upon a philosophical yardstick for measuring the truth of ideas and even if we could find some way that transcended nose counting for determining the effectiveness of the rhetoric.
Material used in this test passage has been adapted from the following source:
C. Brooks, The formalist critic. ©1951 by The Kenyon Review.
The author of the passage probably rejects the use of biography and psychology in literary criticism because these disciplines:
cannot provide any information about literature.
assume that the author’s intention as realized is the only intention that counts.
take into account the entire range of possible readings of a literary work.
focus on the process of literary composition and not on its product.
The author of the passage probably rejects the use of biography and psychology in literary criticism because these disciplines focus on the mental processes of the author and the history of taste, rather than the structure of the literary work itself.
According to the author, literary works are written as expressions of particular personalities, but the formalist critic is primarily concerned with the work itself and not with the author's intention or the process of composition.
The author argues that the relevant part of the author's intention is what the author actually put into the work, and an ideal reader is assumed to focus on the structure of the poem or novel rather than on the varying spectrum of possible readings.
Therefore, the author does not reject biography and psychology as disciplines, but rather as tools for literary criticism.
To know more about biography refer to-
https://brainly.com/question/868907
#SPJ11
What is the text structure
Answer:
Text structures refer to the way authors organize information in text
45. In what sort of place does Grendel's mother live? Give a detailed description.
Grendel's mother lives in a dark, underwater lair known as a mere. This habitat is characterized by its gloomy, murky atmosphere and is often described as a dismal, eerie place. The mere is filled with treacherous creatures and surrounded by treacherous terrain, making it a fitting home for the fearsome monster.
Grendel's mother lives in a dark and eerie underwater cave located at the bottom of a murky, blood-stained mere. The cave is described as being so deep that light cannot penetrate it, and the water is so cold that it burns. The walls of the cave are covered in slimy moss and algae, and the only source of light comes from a few flickering torches.
Inside the cave, there are bones and remnants of previous victims scattered around, giving the impression of a gruesome lair. The air is thick with the stench of death and decay, and the atmosphere is one of fear and foreboding. It is a place where few dare to venture, and even fewer come back alive.
To know more about Grendel's mother click here:
https://brainly.com/question/3257570
#SPJ11
All dolphins are mammals, all mammals have kidneys; therefore all dolphins have kidneys.
All dolphins are mammals, all mammals have kidneys; therefore all dolphins have kidneys. Given argument is valid.
This is an example of a valid deductive argument known as a syllogism. A syllogism is a logical argument that applies deductive reasoning to arrive at a conclusion based on two premises. In this case, the syllogism is as follows:
Premise 1: All dolphins are mammals.
Premise 2: All mammals have kidneys.
Conclusion: Therefore, all dolphins have kidneys.
This argument is valid because the conclusion follows logically from the premises. If we accept the two premises as true, then the conclusion must also be true. The argument is deductive because it draws a conclusion based on the logical relationship between the premises and the conclusion.
It is important to note, however, that a valid argument can still have false premises. In this case, if either of the premises were false (for example, if not all mammals have kidneys), then the conclusion would also be false. Therefore, it is important to ensure that the premises of an argument are supported by evidence before accepting the conclusion as true.
All dolphins are mammals, all mammals have kidneys; therefore all dolphins have kidneys. Given argument is valid or not?
To know more about syllogism, please click on:
https://brainly.com/question/361872
#SPJ11
Essential Question: What do our
possessions reveal about us? What
has this article taught you about
materialism? Discuss with your group
Our possessions can reveal a lot about our personalities, values, and priorities. They can reflect our social status, interests, and even our emotions. This article has taught me that materialism, the excessive focus on material possessions, can have negative consequences on our well-being and relationships.
Materialism can lead to a never-ending cycle of wanting more and feeling unsatisfied, which can cause stress and anxiety. It can also contribute to the deterioration of personal relationships and the environment.
Not all possessions are bad. Some items hold sentimental value or provide practical benefits. The key is to have a healthy relationship with our possessions and not let them define our self-worth or happiness.
In discussing with my group, we agreed that it's important to be mindful of our consumption habits and prioritize experiences and relationships over material possessions. We also acknowledged that society and advertising often push us to value material goods, but it's up to us to resist those pressures and focus on what truly matters in life.
Learn more about possessions here:
https://brainly.com/question/10107609
#SPJ4
The complete question is:
What do our possessions reveal about us? What have you learned about materialism from reading this story?
What does Krogstad ask that Nora do to prevent him from losing his job?
Krogstad asks Nora to influence her husband, Torvald, to keep Krogstad's job at the bank. He wants her to convince Torvald not to fire him and preserve his employment
Krogstad asks Nora to use her influence with her husband, Torvald, to ensure that he doesn't fire him from his job at the bank. He specifically requests that she convinces Torvald to let him keep his position at the bank, even though he's been previously dismissed due to a forgery incident. This is one of the key moments in Henrik Ibsen's play "A Doll's House," where the complex relationships and power dynamics between the characters are first revealed and the story's central conflicts begin to emerge.
To know more about Krogstad visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30241322
#SPJ11
.
In the book Cyrano De Bergerac by Edmond Rostand, Why does Christian dare to insult Cyrano's nose?
In the play Cyrano de Bergerac, Christian insults Cyrano's nose because he wants to win the affection of Roxane, who has expressed her admiration for Cyrano's wit and eloquence. Christian is a handsome but inarticulate young man who has fallen in love with Roxane, but he is unable to express his feelings to her in a way that would win her heart. Cyrano, on the other hand, is a brilliant poet and swordsman, but his physical appearance is marred by his large nose.
When Christian first meets Cyrano, he is taken aback by the size of his nose and makes a comment about it. Cyrano responds by using his quick wit and sharp tongue to turn the insult back on Christian, making him look foolish in front of Roxane. However, Christian realizes that he needs Cyrano's help to win Roxane's heart, so he apologizes and asks for his assistance.
Later, when Roxane tells Cyrano that she has fallen in love with Christian's "soul," but not his "words," Cyrano sees an opportunity to use his own talents to help Christian. He agrees to write love letters for Christian to give to Roxane, but he insists that Christian must memorize the letters and speak them to Roxane himself. This way, Cyrano can use his words to win Roxane's heart, while Christian can use his good looks to woo her.
In the end, Christian's insults to Cyrano's nose were just a momentary lapse in judgment. He realizes that he needs Cyrano's help and is willing to apologize and ask for it. And Cyrano, in turn, uses his talents to help Christian win Roxane's love, even though he himself is in love with her.
In the play Cyrano de Bergerac by Edmond Rostand, Christian insults Cyrano's nose because he wants to get back at him for mocking his lack of wit and ability to woo Roxane, the woman they both love.
Christian is frustrated that he cannot express his love for Roxane in the eloquent, romantic language that she desires, and Cyrano's taunts about his lack of poetic skill only add to his frustration.
In a fit of anger and desperation, Christian insults Cyrano's nose, which is famously large and has been the subject of ridicule from others throughout Cyrano's life.
This sets off a chain of events that leads to the climax of the play, where Cyrano helps Christian express his love for Roxane in his own words, while hiding his own love for her.
To know more about Cyrano visit:
brainly.com/question/30143593
Which sentence from The "Checkers" speech is an example of an ad hominem attack?
The ad hominem attack in The "Checkers" speech can be found in the following sentence: "My opponents have not been content with attacks on me, or my wife, but now they are attacking my little dog, Checkers."
Here, Richard Nixon is attempting to discredit his opponents' attacks by suggesting that they have gone too far by attacking his beloved pet, Checkers. This is an example of an ad hominem attack, as Nixon is attempting to shift the focus away from the arguments themselves and onto the opponents' personal character and intentions.
By appealing to the audience's emotions rather than the facts of the case, Nixon is attempting to distract from the accusations and paint his opponents in a negative light.
To know more about Richard Nixon, click here;
https://brainly.com/question/199427
#SPJ1
How does Mrs. Linde's "freedom" make her feel?
Mrs. Linde, a character in Henrik Ibsen's play "A Doll's House," experiences a sense of freedom after the death of her husband. Initially, she feels liberated from the constraints of her loveless marriage and the societal expectations placed upon her as a woman. This newfound independence allows her to reevaluate her priorities and make decisions based on her desires and needs.
However, Mrs. Linde's freedom also brings about feelings of loneliness and a longing for companionship. As she navigates her new life, she realizes the importance of emotional support and genuine relationships. Her interactions with other characters, such as Nora and Krogstad, demonstrate her desire to reconnect with her past and form meaningful connections.
In conclusion, Mrs. Linde's freedom presents both positive and negative aspects. While it grants her the opportunity to explore her identity and desires, it also highlights the need for emotional connections and supportive relationships. This complex mix of emotions and experiences ultimately leads to her pursuit of a more fulfilling life.
to know more about Mrs. Linde's "freedom" click this link -
brainly.com/question/15113786
#SPJ11
Identify the example of formal language.
The papers told about the problems abolitionists were against.
The broadsides were sayin’ somthin’ about all the problems abolitionists were fighting against.
Broadsaids were yelling all about the problems they’re tryin’ to prevent.
Broadsides exulted the voluminous examples of oppression the abolitionists were fighting against
The writings that described the issues abolitionists were against are an example of formal language.
This statement uses proper grammar, vocabulary, and sentence structure, which are the characteristics of formal language. It avoids the use of colloquialisms, slang, or contractions, which are typical of informal language.
In contrast, options B and C use colloquial language and non-standard grammar, which are characteristics of informal language. Option D uses some formal language but also includes unnecessary and verbose language that could be simplified without losing meaning.
Formal language is characterized by its use of standard grammar, vocabulary, and sentence structure, with the goal of being clear, concise, and objective. It is typically used in professional or academic settings, where precision and clarity are essential.
To learn more about formal language
https://brainly.com/question/24222916
#SPJ4
Complete question:
Identify the example of formal language.
A - The papers told about the problems abolitionists were against.
B - The broadsides were sayin’ somthin’ about all the problems abolitionists were fighting against.
C - Broadsaids were yelling all about the problems they’re tryin’ to prevent.
D - Broadsides exulted the voluminous examples of oppression the abolitionists were fighting against
Why do you think the author describes
Worsley’s character at this point in the selection?
Worsley’s character at this point in the selection is because she has just read Worsley's journal and wants to give the anthology some insight into Worsley's humour at the time of his notation.
The poet is portraying Worsley at this precise moment. Despite the difficulties the men were facing, Worsley was able to maintain his sense of humour, according to the litterateur.
Sir Ernest Shackleton and five companions sailed the James Caird on a 300-kilometer (800-mile) journey from Elephant Island in the South Shetland Islands across the Southern Ocean to South Georgia in order to save the majority of the Imperial Trans-Antarctic Expedition, which had been lost at sea between 1914 and 1917. Chroniclers revere the mob's journey through the "Furious Fifties" aboard a 22.5-foot (6.9 m) ship's boat.
To know more about Character visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30107156
#SPJ4
Which word best reflects a theme that can be inferred from both the passage and the painting? violence honor injustice immortality
The word that reflects best as a theme that can be inferred from both the passage and the painting is "honor".
George Washington's term as president of the United States began on April 30, 1789, with his inauguration, and it concluded on March 4, 1797.
The District of Columbia, along the Potomac River, is designated as the permanent location of the nation's capital by President Washington, who also signs the legislation into law. A bill directing the federal government to take on the states' obligations from the Revolutionary War is signed into law by President Washington.
The first President of the United States, George Washington, took his oath of office on April 30, 1789, while seated on the balcony of Federal Hall on Wall Street in New York.
To know more about George Washington here:
https://brainly.com/question/13737174
#SPJ1
Read lines 3–4 of “Here Follow Some Verses Upon the Burning of Our House.”
I wakened was with thund’ring noise
And piteous shrieks of dreadful voice.
The language in these lines emphasizes that the fire
I wakened was with thund'ring noise, And piteous shrieks of dreadful voice are the lines of “Here Follow Some Verses Upon the Burning of Our House.” The meaning of the lines is Bradstreet feels bad because she hurts because she lost her material possessions.
It is against her conviction that she ought to feel as such; showing she is a heathen. Bradstreet accept that the loss of material possessions was a spiritually necessary event thanks to her firm Puritan beliefs. This poem's main point is books are destroyed if they are false or ignorant.
Learn more about Bradstreet, here:
https://brainly.com/question/2216672
#SPJ1
Although Torvald doesn't trust her with the children, why does he still want Nora to continue living with them?
Torvald may not trust Nora with the children, but he still wants her to continue living with them because he values her role as a wife and mother. Additionally, he may rely on her to manage the household and take care of their needs. Nora's presence also serves to maintain their social status as a family, as it would be frowned upon in their society for a married woman to leave her husband and children.
Furthermore, Torvald may have deep feelings for Nora, despite his distrust of her abilities as a mother, and may want to maintain their relationship and the appearance of a happy family. Additionally, he views Nora as an extension of himself, rather than an individual with her own agency, and believes her presence contributes to his own sense of self-worth and success. Torvald embraces the belief that a man’s role in marriage is to protect and guide his wife. He clearly enjoys the idea that Nora needs his guidance, and he interacts with her as a father would. He instructs her with trite, moralistic sayings, such as: “A home that depends on loans and debt is not beautiful because it is not free.” He is also eager to teach Nora the dance she performs at the costume party. Torvald likes to envision himself as Nora’s savior, asking her after the party, “Do you know that I’ve often wished you were facing some terrible dangers so that I could risk life and limb, risk everything, for your sake?”
To know more about A Doll's house click here:
brainly.com/question/12446066
#SPJ11
