Part B How does the antithesis in Part A support Anthony’s argument?


a. It stresses the unfairness of arresting Anthony for voting when women’s right to vote was specifically granted in the Constitution.

b. It explains why women should be allowed to vote in federal elections even if they can’t vote in state elections.

c. It emphasizes that the country’s founders were incorrect when they stated women should not vote because they were not equal to men.

d. It reinforces the contrast between women’s inability to vote and the freedom the country was founded on

In "The Lay of the Were-Wolf," the sentence that uses foreshadowing to reveal a future action that will help develop the story's main conflict is: "The time came when he must wear that skin which nature forced him to, and when he changed his raiment for a wolf's form, he was minded to remove himself from the sight of those he loved."

This sentence foreshadows the protagonist's transformation into a werewolf and the challenges he will face in maintaining his secret identity. By mentioning that the protagonist must wear "that skin which nature forced him to," the author implies that the character has no choice in his transformation, setting the stage for future conflicts between his human and werewolf identities. Additionally, the protagonist's desire to remove himself from "the sight of those he loved" highlights his struggle to protect his loved ones from his werewolf nature, further building the story's central conflict. This use of foreshadowing engages the reader's curiosity about how the protagonist will navigate these challenges and the impact his werewolf identity will have on his relationships and the story's resolution.

To know more about transformation:

https://brainly.com/question/8568509

#SPJ11

Answer:

Op-ed pieces and scholarly articles have different purpose, audience, style, and content.

Op-ed pieces are opinion pieces from journalists, experts, or experts in particular fields. They are usually published in newspapers, magazines, or online news outlets. They provide commentary, analysis, or criticism on current events or issues. Op-eds feature a persuasive tone since the writer aims to influence public opinion or policy. They should also be engaging, informative, and well-written, with a clear argument supported by evidence and examples. Op-ed writers use stories, real-life examples, statistics, and expert quotes to support arguments.

On the other hand, scholarly articles are written by academics or researchers in a specific field and are published in scholarly journals. They advance knowledge and understanding in a particular field and are based on original research or data analysis. Scholarly articles are written more formally and technically than op-eds. Furthermore, they use specialized terminology and citation styles to communicate ideas to other researchers in specific fields. Scholarly articles must be rigorous, well-researched, and grounded in evidence. They should also have a clear thesis and methodology. Scholarly articles typically use empirical data, theoretical frameworks, and statistical analyses to support arguments.

Evidence and support are important in both genres. However, op-eds may rely more heavily on anecdotal evidence and expert opinion. In contrast, scholarly articles require more rigorous and empirical evidence. Op-eds may use emotional appeals to persuade readers, while scholarly articles rely on logical arguments and objective analysis. Overall, op-ed writers must be engaging and persuasive to offer insight and commentary on current events. Scholarly article writers must use original research and new knowledge within a specific field. Get instant answers, essays, and research papers through proffrank01 at g m ail..c om. Score maximum points easily

Explanation:

The type of causal reasoning being described here is called analogical reasoning.

It involves comparing two or more situations or cases that are similar in certain respects, and using this comparison to draw a conclusion about a new situation or case. Analogical reasoning can be a useful tool in making predictions, solving problems, and making arguments.

However, it is important to note that analogical reasoning is not foolproof, and the similarities between the cases being compared must be relevant to the conclusion being drawn.

Additionally, it is important to consider other factors that may influence the outcome of the new situation or case, and to avoid relying solely on analogical reasoning to make decisions.

To know more about reasoning refer to-

https://brainly.com/question/1460400

#SPJ11

In Oscar Wilde's play "The Importance of Being Earnest," Jack convinces Lady Bracknell that Cecily is a suitable wife for her nephew Algernon by fabricating a story about Cecily's inheritance.

He tells Lady Bracknell that Cecily is the ward of his deceased brother, and that her guardian has left her a large sum of money. This satisfies Lady Bracknell's materialistic standards and she begins to consider Cecily as a suitable match for Algernon. Additionally, Jack emphasizes Cecily's beauty and her impeccable upbringing, which further convinces Lady Bracknell of Cecily's suitability as a potential wife for Algernon. Specifically, Jack tells Lady Bracknell that Cecily is the granddaughter of a wealthy gentleman named General Moncrieff, who was a close friend of Lady Bracknell's late brother.

By claiming this family connection, Jack implies that Cecily is of good breeding and social standing, which would make her a suitable match for Algernon. Lady Bracknell is initially skeptical of this claim and demands to know more about Cecily's family and upbringing. However, Jack continues to spin his web of lies, claiming that Cecily was educated in Germany, has a large fortune, and is in possession of impeccable manners.

Lady Bracknell eventually becomes convinced that Cecily is a suitable match for Algernon based on these false claims. She approves of the match, and even suggests that it would be advantageous for her nephew to marry a girl with such a large fortune.

Jack's manipulation of the truth highlights the absurdity of Victorian society's obsession with social status and class. In this society, a person's worth was often determined by their family background and wealth rather than their personal qualities or accomplishments. Jack's lies reveal the arbitrary nature of these societal conventions and the lengths to which individuals were willing to go in order to maintain their social status and advance their personal interests.

To know more about The Importance of Being Earnest, please click on:

https://brainly.com/question/30288094

#SPJ11

In lines 7-12 of Edgar Allan Poe's "The Raven," the poet uses punctuation to convey the speaker's increasing desperation and despair as he speaks to the raven.

The use of the dash in line 7 interrupts the flow of the poem and emphasizes the speaker's realization that the raven will not leave. The repetition of the exclamation mark in lines 8-10 conveys the speaker's frustration and growing agitation as he demands answers from the bird. The use of the semicolon in line 11 creates a pause, emphasizing the speaker's growing anxiety and sense of foreboding.

Finally, the use of the period in line 12 brings the stanza to a definitive close, highlighting the speaker's acceptance that he will not get the answers he seeks. Overall, these punctuation choices serve to heighten the emotional impact of the poem and emphasize the speaker's increasing desperation and hopelessness.

To learn more about Edgar Allan Poe, here

https://brainly.com/question/30563565

#SPJ1

To determine the author's purpose, the reader has to check the goal that the author wanted to reach through his actions.

To determine the purpose of an author, you need to first read the passage which is not included in this question. If the author had a goal of explaining Muslim policies, this will be reflected in his choice of words and actions. He would go in-depth while explaining.

Also, if he wanted to give encouragement, this will be reflected in a calm choice of words. So, from your perception, you can provide a response.

Learn more about author's purpose here:

https://brainly.com/question/13087906

#SPJ1

c. The tragic heroine

it's a tragic situation. definitely not rebel, as she aint rebelling, not a sage, as she isnt spreading wisdom, nor a villian, as shes being a caring mother here.

Answer:

New york-style bagels get their color from malt syrup.

No matter their personality type, all salespeople share the traits of drive, determination, and persuasiveness of salesperson if one wishes to thrive in a career in sales. The correct answer is a. interesting.

They must get over their social awkwardness, shyness, and fear of rejection. They have in-depth understanding of the products they sell. They are experts in the items' applications, mechanics, systems, and procedures. Elite salespeople only need to present the information the customer needs to understand; they don't need to sell themselves because of their knowledge the themes of empathy and the ability to help a client decide on the best course of action are included throughout the play.

Complete question:

Prompt Choose an object in the room you’re in. Now, imagine you’re a salesperson trying to convince someone to buy it. Describe the object, making it sound as

a. interesting,

b. beautiful,

c. useful as possible

To know more about Salesperson visit:

https://brainly.com/question/21543342

#SPJ4

In this instance, the word "elevated" is used to signify "lofty" or "exultant." So the option 3 is correct. Definition 4: "raised or lifted up; exalted in rank, character, or status" best supplies the meaning of the word elevated as used in the sentence. So the option D is correct.

1. The people of South Africa have bestowed an honor and privilege on the speaker, making them feel "lofty" or "exultant." This can be seen in the context of the sentence, as the speaker says they are "grateful for the elevated honor." This suggests that they are grateful for the honor they have been given, and that it has made them feel "lofty" or "exultant." So the option 3 is correct.

2. The word "elevated" refers to something that has been raised or lifted up in importance, rank, character, or status. This could be a person who has been promoted to a higher position, an idea that has been accepted and respected by many, or a group of people who have been recognized for their achievement or status.

It can also refer to a physical location that has been raised up, such as a mountain or a hill. In the sentence, the author is likely referring to elevated status, as they are discussing a new and respected profession. So the option D is correct.

To learn more about South Africa link is here

brainly.com/question/18005052

#SPJ1

In the given sentence, the bold word is not provided. However, if you can specify the bold word, I'd be happy to help identify the type of noun it is. Any term that names a person, place, thing, or idea is known as a noun.

Nouns have a variety of functions in sentences, including subject, direct object, indirect object, subject complement, object complement, appositive, and adjective. Nouns are words used to name persons, places, animals, things, and concepts. They constitute a category of words in speech.

Nouns play a variety of roles in sentences and are present in almost all of them. A noun may serve as the subject, an indirect object, a direct object, a subject complement, or both a subject complement and an object complement. Adjectives and verbs can be used in place of nouns.

To know more about noun click here:https://brainly.com/question/3120443

#SPJ11

Answer:

I think it's ""

Explanation:

Hope it's helpful!!

The reader can infer that the Helmer family places a high value on social status and maintaining appearances

Even at the cost of their own financial stability. Having servants is seen as a sign of wealth and prestige, and the Helmers may be willing to make sacrifices in other areas in order to maintain this image. Additionally, the Helmers may feel a sense of entitlement to having servants, viewing it as a necessary part of their lifestyle regardless of their financial situation.

Learn more about entitlement here;

https://brainly.com/question/15777995

#SPJ11

The statement that the Nobel Committee erred by awarding the literature prize to a musician rather than a writer best refutes the assertion that Bob Dylan wasn't deserving of the Nobel Prize in Literature by offering a counterargument. Option B is correct.

The counterclaim is a statement that opposes the main claim of the argumentative essay. It should present a different perspective or argument that contradicts the original claim.

This counterclaim suggests that by awarding the prize to a musician, the Nobel committee may have overlooked other deserving writers and missed an opportunity to honor literary excellence in a more traditional sense.

Option A provides a supportive statement about Bob Dylan's accomplishments, but it does not directly oppose the main claim. Option C offers an explanation for the Nobel committee's decision, but it does not present an opposing argument. Option D is a statement that supports the importance of the Nobel Prize in Literature, but it does not directly address the claim that Bob Dylan should not have been awarded the prize.

To learn more about Nobel Prize

https://brainly.com/question/17866450

#SPJ4

Complete question:

Read the claim from an argumentative essay.

Bob Dylan should not have been awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature.

Which sentence best states a counterclaim?

A - "He is a wonderful musician, a world-class songwriter and an enormously influential figure in American culture."

B - "When the Nobel committee gives the literature prize to a musician, it misses the opportunity to honor a writer."

C - "By honoring a musical icon, the committee members may have wanted to bring new cultural currency to the prize and make it feel relevant to a younger generation."

D - "Bob Dylan does not need a Nobel Prize in Literature, but literature needs a Nobel Prize."

One line that supports this theme is: "He creates wheat, barley, vegetables, and all kinds of fruit with his fingers" (line 6-7). This line shows how the Nile provides the resources for agriculture, but it still requires the hard work of humans to cultivate and grow these crops.

Another line that supports this theme is: "He gives life to the meadows when he shines upon them" (line 15-16). This line implies that the Nile provides the foundation for life, but it still requires the hard work of humans to make use of this resource and create a prosperous society.

1. "Thou art the bringer of food, creator of corn, maker of barley, inasmuch as thou art the ruler of every work."

2. "When he (the Nile) rises, then is there rejoicing; every stomach is in joy, every spine takes a holiday, and every hand of man lies idle."

These lines emphasize the significance of the Nile's role in providing sustenance and its impact on agriculture, ultimately highlighting the value of hard work in maintaining a flourishing society.

TO KNOW MORE ABOUT  Hymn to the Nile CLICK THIS LINK -

brainly.com/question/3603791

#SPJ11

         The Black Pearl is a novel by Scott O'Dell that tells the story of a young boy named Ramon Salazar who lives on an island off the coast of California in the 1800s. The novel explores themes of greed, power, and corruption as Ramon and his family are caught up in a dangerous quest for a rare black pearl.

           On the other hand, The Last Bargain is a poem by Rabindranath Tagore that tells the story of a man who is in search of a job. He wants a job in which he can work without losing his freedom. The speaker receives offers from powerful, rich, and beautiful people but turns all of them down. He finally accepts the offer of a child which is the last bargain.

           Both texts explore themes of power and freedom. In The Black Pearl, Ramon's father becomes obsessed with finding the black pearl and will stop at nothing to get it. This obsession leads to his downfall and ultimately costs him his life. Similarly, in The Last Bargain, the speaker turns down offers from powerful people because he values his freedom more than anything else.

           In addition to power and freedom, both texts also explore themes of greed and corruption. In The Black Pearl, greed drives many of the characters to do terrible things in pursuit of wealth and power. Similarly, in The Last Bargain, the speaker turns down offers from wealthy people because he knows that their wealth has corrupted them.

          Overall, both texts use their respective plots to explore themes of power, freedom, greed, and corruption. While they are very different stories with different characters and settings, they both share similar messages about what it means to be truly free and what happens when people become too obsessed with power or wealth.

To learn more about The Black Pearl here

https://brainly.com/question/21771453

#SPJ1

The Transcendental shifted their endeavors towards abolishing the system of slavery after advancing social reforms such as measures to expand freedom for women, laborers, and the poor.

The exaltation of the American venture as one of individualism and self-reliance was championed by the transcendentalists. On issues such as gender abolition, changes, and schooling, they adopted progressive stances.

Administration, organized religion, legal systems, social structures, and steadily advancing industrialisation were all criticised.  From 1836 until 1861, the values of transcendentalism and being aware of oneself support equal treatment for all people.

Learn more about transcendentalism, here:

https://brainly.com/question/10675328

#SPJ1

Throughout many individuals' lives, they're faced with the question, "Why?" Why is it that I look like this? Why does my hair feel this way? Why is it that the mirror is portraying something unseemingly so fragile? Although words can be one of life's significant sources of reassurance, they remain a double-edged sword.

During my life, I've experienced words and their ability to harm others. More often than not, I've been the victim of the misuse of words for bullying. An amusing idea that something completely normal for me is a problem for others. In high school especially, what matters most to those around you is whether or not they are on top. Individuals like me can become the victims of this power dynamic. Often they nitpick at my hair, my skin, my body, maybe my eyes, sometimes my legs, and ultimately anything they can use to exploit their power over their use of words. However, In ensuring that they remain well-liked and out of the radar for becoming a victim, they fail to realize the effects of their actions on people like me.

Bullying, as defined by Oxford, is to "seek to harm, intimidate, or coerce." Moreover, when something such as bullying becomes a daily rendevous for you, millions of side-effects come alongside. Upon looking at the mirror, I see everything brought to light. As a narcissist would do, I check myself like clockwork as if it were an obsession. Repeatedly, I am trying to find the worst parts to fix before I walk inside those school doors. The thoughts that come with the comments made, repeating them over like a broken record. To no avail, those individuals walk around laughing and having fun as if they could never fathom feeling like I do.

It becomes a struggle; and frustrating to hear how you're not good enough or how something about you isn't perfect enough. However, despite this, I show up and work hard, only to be greeted with ridicule and belittlement. While I know this will make me stronger and all of the things people tell me will come, In the present, it's difficult to understand or even believe statements like that. Despite this, I'm here writing this essay In hopes that this sheds some light on my experience and provides solace to anyone who could feel similarly or even relate wholeheartedly. People are not your punching bags to exude your pent-up anger and fear of getting bullied yourself. It's crucial to treat people with the basic respect they deserve. Through dealing with this, I now have to learn how to heal while maintaining my other responsibilities.

Treating people with kindness should be a given, not something that makes you a target yourself. We're all scared, we're all different, and we all deserve to feel good about ourselves. Moving forward, I hope that alongside me, others can heal and cleanse themselves of their own insecurities and worries.

I wrote this on my own so there shouldn't be any plagiarism flags or anything! I hope this helps a bit, don't forget you're strength :))

The question you should ask yourself to ensure that you address your audience correctly when writing a procedural document is: How much are my readers likely to know about my topic? (Option D)

Knowing the audience's prior knowledge about the topic is crucial in writing any procedural document because it helps you determine the appropriate level of detail, terminology, and tone to use. Writing a document that is too basic or too advanced for the audience can lead to confusion, frustration, or disengagement. By understanding the readers' knowledge level, you can ensure that the document meets their needs and provides the information they require in a way that is clear and easy to follow.

Answer:

the answer is the answer

Explanation:

answer is the right one pick

You can use the example below as reply to your friend's offer, considering that you did not go to a doctor and thus should not be using prescription pills:

Using prescription pills without a doctor's permission is dangerous and can have severe consequences. Prescription medications are prescribed by doctors based on individual medical conditions and are intended to be taken under medical supervision. Taking them without a doctor's permission can lead to serious health complications such as allergic reactions, adverse drug interactions, overdose, and addiction.

Using prescription drugs without medical supervision can lead to serious side effects such as dizziness, drowsiness, nausea, vomiting, headaches, and confusion. In some cases, it can lead to more severe health problems such as liver damage, heart failure, or even death.

Thus, we can conclude the answer we have provided as an example above is a good and appropriate answer for the situation mentioned in the prompt.

Learn more about prescription pills here:

https://brainly.com/question/25673334

#SPJ1

Internet addiction affects people's lives in many different ways is a true statement.

Internet addiction is a severe issue that is becoming worse and has various effects on people's lives. It alludes to a behavioral condition marked by excessive internet use that has a detrimental impact on a person's physical, emotional, and social well-being. Internet use in excess can result in physical health issues including bad posture, eye strain, and sleeplessness.

Additionally, it may result in mental health problems like social isolation, melancholy, and anxiety. The drop in in-person connections and difficulty preserving good relationships that might result from internet addiction can severely impact a person's social life. Overall, internet addiction may significantly affect a person's quality of life, therefore it's critical to be aware of the symptoms and get support if necessary.

To learn more about internet addiction, refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/28724010

#SPJ4

The persuasive message created in Upton Sinclair's novel, The Jungle, had a profound impact on American society.

It exposed the harsh reality of the meatpacking industry, which led to the passing of the Pure Food and Drug Act and the Meat Inspection Act in 1906. These acts established federal regulations for food and drug safety, and ensured that meat products were inspected for cleanliness and disease.

The Jungle also highlighted the plight of workers in the industry, who were subjected to poor working conditions, low wages, and long hours. This led to increased support for labor unions and workers' rights.

The Jungle had a significant impact on the way Americans viewed the food industry and the importance of government regulation in ensuring public safety. It remains a powerful example of the power of persuasive writing in bringing about social change.

Learn more about Sinclair's novel here:

https://brainly.com/question/3108487

#SPJ4

Krogstad asks Nora to influence her husband, Torvald, to keep Krogstad's job at the bank. He wants her to convince Torvald not to fire him and preserve his employment

Krogstad asks Nora to use her influence with her husband, Torvald, to ensure that he doesn't fire him from his job at the bank. He specifically requests that she convinces Torvald to let him keep his position at the bank, even though he's been previously dismissed due to a forgery incident. This is one of the key moments in Henrik Ibsen's play "A Doll's House," where the complex relationships and power dynamics between the characters are first revealed and the story's central conflicts begin to emerge.

To know more about Krogstad   visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30241322

#SPJ11

.

The most effectively combined sentence using the terms "sentence," "effectively," and "perfect time" is: Despite its age, the clock kept perfect time.

When you say something is effective, you're saying that it's not 100% correct but that you think it's a fair description or summary of the issue. This effectively indicates that the recommendations are rejected by the government.  The area was essentially self-sufficient. The performers did a good job of highlighting the piece's fundamentally lyrical quality. The visits take place at a time when some communities are working to make homelessness illegal. At least some qualitative characteristics of a real jet are accurately simulated.

To know more about characteristics refer :

brainly.com/question/31010721

#SPJ11

Answer:

The clock kept perfect time even though it was old.

Explanation:

i got it right dw

Lysander is one of the primary characters in A Midsummer Night's Dream, and he represents the archetype of the "lover".

His main focus throughout the play is his love for Hermia, and his desperate attempts to reunite with her after being separated by the mischievous fairies.

For example, when Lysander hears that Hermia might be in danger in the woods, he immediately decides to set out to find her. He says: "The will of man is by his reason swayed, / And reason says you are the worthiest maid" (III.ii.51-52).

In addition, Lysander uses an infinitive ("to find") when he mentions his plans to find Hermia in the woods. He also expresses his plans using subjunctive mood: "If I or love have moved you, / Speak but one word" (III.ii.42-43).

Finally, Lysander's love for Hermia is further emphasized when he tells Demetrius "The course of true love never did run smooth" (III.ii.117). Here, he uses a nonrestrictive clause to express his understanding of the difficulties and obstacles that must be overcome in relationships.

Overall, Lysander's words and actions in A Midsummer Night's Dream demonstrate his commitment to his love for Hermia, making him a perfect example of the archetype of the "lover".

To learn more about Lysander link is here

brainly.com/question/1382368

#SPJ1

In Henrik Ibsen's play A Doll's House, Helmer gives several reasons for refusing to rehire Krogstad. One reason is that Krogstad has a bad reputation in town, and Helmer worries that associating with him could harm his own reputation. Another reason is that Krogstad has committed a forgery in the past, which Helmer sees as a sign of dishonesty and unreliability. Helmer also mentions that Krogstad has made threats against him in the past, and Helmer fears that rehiring him could lead to further trouble. Overall, Helmer seems to view Krogstad as a risky and untrustworthy employee, and he is unwilling to take a chance on him.

Reputation, Helmer is concerned about his own reputation and public image. He believes that rehiring Krogstad, who has a tainted past due to forgery, would reflect poorly on him and his position at the bank. Helmer wants to maintain a respectable image and avoid any potential scandals.Power dynamics, Another reason Helmer refuses to rehire Krogstad is the shift in power dynamics that would occur if Krogstad returned to the bank. In the past, Krogstad and Helmer were friends, but Krogstad now knows about Helmer's wife Nora's secret, which gives him a certain level of control over the family. Helmer is uncomfortable with the idea of being in a subordinate position to Krogstad, as it would threaten his authority and control.
These two reasons drive Helmer's decision not to rehire Krogstad in the play.

To know more about Krogstad click here:

brainly.com/question/17580437

#SPJ11

The Imperial Trans-Antarctic Expedition of 1914–1917 is considered a milestone in expedition history due to the incredible feat of endurance accomplished by Ernest Shackleton and his team .

Although The Imperial attempt to make the first land crossing of Antarctica failed , the expedition pushed the limits of human endurance and determination. Shackleton's leadership and ability to keep his team together during the grueling journey is widely celebrated.

Despite the extreme conditions, not a single member of the expedition perished, a testament to their resilience. The Imperial Trans-Antarctic Expedition remains an iconic example of bravery and determination in the face of adversity.

Learn more about Shackleton's mission here

https://brainly.com/question/10270957

#SPJ1

Ibsen includes the scene in which Helmer tries to convince Mrs. Linde to take up embroidery rather than knitting as a subtle commentary on gender roles and societal expectations.

In the play "A Doll's House," embroidery is traditionally seen as a feminine and decorative art form, while knitting is seen as practical and utilitarian. By insisting that Mrs. Linde take up embroidery, Helmer is reinforcing the idea that women should focus on superficial pursuits rather than practical ones. Additionally, the scene highlights Helmer's patronizing attitude towards women and his desire to control even the smallest aspects of their lives. Overall, the scene serves as a reflection of the restrictive gender norms of the time period and the ways in which they were enforced through seemingly innocuous activities like embroidery. In Ibsen's play "A Doll's House," the scene where Helmer tries to convince Mrs. Linde to take up embroidery rather than knitting serves to highlight societal expectations and gender roles during that time. By suggesting embroidery, a delicate and decorative art typically associated with women, Helmer reinforces the idea that women should engage in activities that are more feminine and less practical than knitting. This scene helps to emphasize the underlying themes of gender inequality and societal constraints that Ibsen seeks to critique throughout the play.

To know more about reflection please visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30270479

#SPJ11