PLEASE HELP ME


If f(x) = -3 and g(x) = 4x2 + x = 4, find (f+ g)(x).
ОА
A. 4x2 + x - 1
O B. 6x2 - 7
O 4x
C. 43+ + 2x-1
O D. 4x+3x-7

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

-6z²-10z-3=0

multiply by -1

6z²+10z+3=0

disc .=b²-4ac=10²-4×6×3=100-72=28≥0

also it is not a perfect square.

so roots are real,irrational and different.

[tex]z=\frac{-6 \pm\sqrt{28} }{2 \times 6} \\=\frac{-6 \pm 2 \sqrt{7}}{12} \\=\frac{-3 \pm\sqrt{7} }{6}[/tex]

Answer:

Volume = 63 feet

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the volume of a cube or a rectangular prism, the formula is

(L x W x H)/3. In other words, it is the length of the prism, times the width of the prism, times the height of the prism, whole divided by three, since it has a "triangular shape."

Let's substitute in values for these letters, L, W, and H. You said the length was 7, the width was 6, and the height was 4.5. Therefore, it will result in

(7 x 6 x 4.5)/3. That results in 189/3, which is 63.

Hope this helped!!!

Answer:

2√14 prob I'm not 100% sure

Answer: 62

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

p = 7, q = 2, r = 4

Solve

q ( 5p - r )

Substitute

(2) (5(7) - (4))

Simplify

(2) (35 - 4)

(2) (31)

62

Hope this helps!! :)

Please let me know if you have any questions

Answer:

17

Step-by-step explanation:

Given the regression model :

Y=ax+b

x = Hours of TV watched per day

y= number of sit-ups a person can do

A=-1.341

B=32.234

Y = - 1.341x + 32.234

Predict Y, when x = 11

Y = - 1.341(11) + 32.234

Y = −14.751 + 32.234

Y = 17.483

Hence, the person Cann do approximately 17 sit-ups

Answer:

if the sum of two angles is 90° they are said to be complementary

If one angle is x

the other should be (90 - x)°

so the complementary angle of x is (90 - x)

Answer:

0.015 = 1.5% probability that the mean monitor life would be greater than 83.8 months in a sample of 71 monitors

Step-by-step explanation:

To solve this question, we need to understand the normal probability distribution and the central limit theorem.

Normal Probability Distribution:

Problems of normal distributions can be solved using the z-score formula.

In a set with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex], the z-score of a measure X is given by:

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

The Z-score measures how many standard deviations the measure is from the mean. After finding the Z-score, we look at the z-score table and find the p-value associated with this z-score. This p-value is the probability that the value of the measure is smaller than X, that is, the percentile of X. Subtracting 1 by the p-value, we get the probability that the value of the measure is greater than X.

Central Limit Theorem

The Central Limit Theorem establishes that, for a normally distributed random variable X, with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex], the sampling distribution of the sample means with size n can be approximated to a normal distribution with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]s = \frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}[/tex].

For a skewed variable, the Central Limit Theorem can also be applied, as long as n is at least 30.

Mean life of 82 months with a standard deviation of 7 months.

This means that [tex]\mu = 82, \sigma = 7[/tex]

Sample of 71

This means that [tex]n = 71, s = \frac{7}{\sqrt{71}}[/tex]

What is the probability that the mean monitor life would be greater than 83.8 months?

1 subtracted by the p-value of Z when X = 83.8. So

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

By the Central Limit Theorem

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{s}[/tex]

[tex]Z = \frac{83.8 - 82}{\frac{7}{\sqrt{71}}}[/tex]

[tex]Z = 2.17[/tex]

[tex]Z = 2.17[/tex] has a p-value of 0.985.

1 - 0.985 = 0.015

0.015 = 1.5% probability that the mean monitor life would be greater than 83.8 months in a sample of 71 monitors

Answer:

Option D is answer.

Step-by-step explanation:

Hey there!

Given;

f(x) = 10/9 X + 11

Let f(X) be "y".

y = (10/9) X + 11

Interchange "X" and "y".

x = (10/9) y + 11

or, 9x = 10y + 99

or, y = (9x-99)/10

Therefore, f'(X) = (9x-99)/10.

Hope it helps!

Answer:

0.007 = 0.7% probability that the proportion of Rolls Royce owners in a sample of 595 Americans would differ from the population proportion by more than 3%

Step-by-step explanation:

To solve this question, we need to understand the normal probability distribution and the central limit theorem.

Normal Probability Distribution:

Problems of normal distributions can be solved using the z-score formula.

In a set with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex], the z-score of a measure X is given by:

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

The Z-score measures how many standard deviations the measure is from the mean. After finding the Z-score, we look at the z-score table and find the p-value associated with this z-score. This p-value is the probability that the value of the measure is smaller than X, that is, the percentile of X. Subtracting 1 by the p-value, we get the probability that the value of the measure is greater than X.

Central Limit Theorem

The Central Limit Theorem establishes that, for a normally distributed random variable X, with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex], the sampling distribution of the sample means with size n can be approximated to a normal distribution with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]s = \frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}[/tex].

For a skewed variable, the Central Limit Theorem can also be applied, as long as n is at least 30.

For a proportion p in a sample of size n, the sampling distribution of the sample proportion will be approximately normal with mean [tex]\mu = p[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]s = \sqrt{\frac{p(1-p)}{n}}[/tex]

A statistician calculates that 8% of Americans own a Rolls Royce.

This means that [tex]p = 0.08[/tex]

Sample of 595:

This means that [tex]n = 595[/tex]

Mean and standard deviation:

[tex]\mu = p = 0.08[/tex]

[tex]s = \sqrt{\frac{p(1-p)}{n}} = \sqrt{\frac{0.08*0.92}{595}} = 0.0111[/tex]

What is the probability that the proportion of Rolls Royce owners in a sample of 595 Americans would differ from the population proportion by more than 3%?

Proportion above 8% + 3% = 11% or below 8% - 3% = 5%. Since the normal distribution is symmetric, these probabilities are equal, and so we find one of them and multiply by 2.

Probability the proportion is less than 5%:

P-value of Z when X = 0.05. So

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

By the Central Limit Theorem

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{s}[/tex]

[tex]Z = \frac{0.05 - 0.08}{0.0111}[/tex]

[tex]Z = -2.7[/tex]

[tex]Z = -2.7[/tex] has a p-value of 0.0035

2*0.0035 = 0.0070

0.007 = 0.7% probability that the proportion of Rolls Royce owners in a sample of 595 Americans would differ from the population proportion by more than 3%

Answer:

[tex]\frac{75}{100}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

eh width = 103.5 inches

Step-by-step explanation:

x = width

Length = (x/2 - 5 )*6

so 384=x+3x-30

414=4x

x=414/4=103.5 inches

Answer:

T = 2.215

df = 7

Critical value = 2.364

Fail to reject the null

Step-by-step explanation:

Swimmer __Spandex __Speedo Fastskin__ d

1 __________31.1 _______29.1 __ 2

2_________ 28.9 ______30.4 __ -1.5

3_________ 31.4 ______ 32.0 __ - 0.6

4_________ 34.9 ______31.7 __ 3.2

5 _________27.7 ______28.2 __ - 0.5

6_________ 36.7 _____ 32.9 ___ 3.8

7 _________ 33.3 _____28.6 ___ 4.7

8_________ 30.8 _____26.2 ___ 4.6

The mean difference = Σd / n

2, - 1.5, - 0.6, 3.2, - 0.5, 3.8, 4.7, 4.6

μd = Σd / n = 15.7 / 8 = 1.9625

Sd = standard deviation of difference = 2.5065 (using calculator)

H0 : μd = 0

H1 : μd ≠ 0

The test statistic:

T = μd / (Sd/√n)

T = 1.9625 / (2.5065/√8)

T = 2.2145574

The degree of freedom, df = n - 1 = 8 - 1 = 7

Using a Pvalue calculator :

α = 0.05

Critical value, Tcritical = 2.364 (T distribution table)

Since Test statistic < Critical value

we fail to reject H0 ;

Answer:

m∠TUV = 105

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question given above, the following data were obtained:

m∠TUN = 1 + 38x

m∠NUV = 66°

m∠TUV = 105x

m∠TUV =?

Next, we shall determine the value of x. This can be obtained as illustrated below:

m∠TUV = m∠TUN + m∠NUV

105x = (1 + 38x) + 66

105x = 1 + 38x + 66

Collect like terms

105x – 38x = 1 + 66

67x = 67

Divide both side by 67

x = 67 / 67

x = 1

Finally, we shall determine the value of m∠TUV. This can be obtained as shown below:

m∠TUV = 105x

x = 1

m∠TUV = 105(1)

m∠TUV = 105

Answer:

The ocean surface is at 0 ft elevation. A diver is underwater at a depth of 138 ft. In this area, the ocean floor has a depth of 247 ft.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

A. -¾ + 0 = -¾

B. -¾ - ¾ = -(¾ + ¾)

C. ¾ - ¾ = ¾ + (-¾)

E. -¾ + ¾ = ¾ + (-¾)

F. -¾ + ¾ = 0

Step-by-step explanation:

Let's check each equation to determine whether they are true or false.

If what we have in the both sides are equal, then the equation is true, if they're not, them it is false.

✔️-¾ + 0 = -¾

Add everything on your left together

-¾ = -¾ (TRUE)

✔️-¾ - ¾ = -(¾ + ¾)

Add everything on both sides together respectively

(-3 - 3)/4 = -(3 + 3)/4

-6/4 = -6/4 (TRUE)

✔️¾ - ¾ = ¾ + (-¾)

0 = ¾ - ¾ (+ × - = -)

0 = 0 (TRUE)

✔️-¾ + ¾ = ¾ - (-¾)

0 = ¾ + ¾ (- × - = +)

0 = 6/4 (FALSE)

✔️-¾ + ¾ = ¾ + (-¾)

0 = ¾ - ¾ (+ × - = -)

0 = 0 (TRUE)

✔️-¾ + ¾ = 0

0 = 0 (TRUE)

This question is incomplete, the complete question is;

In the year 2005, the age-adjusted death rate per 100,000 Americans for heart disease was 222.3. In the year 2009, the age-adjusted death rate per 100,000 Americans for heart disease had changed to 213.4.

a) Find an exponential model for this data, where t = 0 corresponds to 1999

Answer:

the exponential model for this data will be; y = 222.3( 0.9898 )^t

Step-by-step explanation:

Given the data in the question;

{ 2005 }, at t = 0, death rate was 222.3

In 2009, { 2009 - 2005 = 4 }, at t = 4 death rate was 213.4

Now, let the exponential equation be;

y = ab^(t)

so at t = 0

222.3 = a × b^(0)

222.3 = a × 1

a = 222.3

at t = 4

213.4 = a × b^(4)

213.4 = 222.3 × b^(4)

b⁴ = 213.4 / 222.3

b = (  213.4 / 222.3 )^(1/4)

b = 0.9898

y = ab^(t)

Hence, the exponential model for this data will be; y = 222.3( 0.9898 )^t

Add boys and girls together for total students:

40 + 16 = 56 total students

Girls to total students is 16/56

Divide both numbers by 8 to get 2/7

The ratio is 2/7

[tex]\sf{\bold{\blue{\underline{\underline{Given}}}}}[/tex]

[tex]\sf{\bold{\red{\underline{\underline{To\:Find}}}}}[/tex]

[tex]\sf{\bold{\purple{\underline{\underline{Solution}}}}}[/tex]

In a class,

boys=40

girls =16

So,

The students of the class =

According to the question,

we have to find the ratio of girls to the total students

⠀⠀⠀⠀

[tex]\sf{\bold{\green{\underline{\underline{Answer}}}}}[/tex]

⠀⠀⠀⠀

Hence,the ratio of girls to students is 2:7

⠀⠀⠀⠀

===========================================================

Explanation:

We have these two functions

which represent the amounts for his friend and William in that order. Strangely your teacher mentions William first, but then swaps the order when listing the exponential function as the first. This might be slightly confusing.

The table of values is shown below. We have t represent the number of years and t starts at 0.5. It increments by 0.1

The f(t) and g(t) columns represent the outputs for those mentioned values of t. For example, if t = 0.5 years (aka 6 months) then f(t) = 12.48 and that indicates his friend has 12,480 dollars in the account.

I've added a fourth column labeled |f - g| which represents the absolute value of the difference of the f and g columns. If f = g, then f-g = 0. The goal is to see if we get 0 in this column or try to get as close as possible. This occurs when we get 0.09 when t = 1.0

So we don't exactly get f(t) and g(t) perfectly equal, but they get very close when t = 1.0

It turns out that the more accurate solution is roughly t = 0.9925 which is close enough. I used a graphing calculator to find this approximate solution.

It takes about a year for the two accounts to have the same approximate amount of money.

Answer:

B

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The measure of the angle is 55º.

Step-by-step explanation:

Complement of angle x:

If two angles are complementary, the sum of their measures is of 90º. Thus, the complement of an angle x is 90 - x.

In this question:

Angle is 120 less than 5 times its own complement, so:

[tex]x = 5(90 - x) - 120[/tex]

We have to solve for x

[tex]x = 450 - 5x - 120[/tex]

[tex]6x = 330[/tex]

[tex]x = \frac{330}{6}[/tex]

[tex]x = 55[/tex]

The measure of the angle is 55º.

Answer:

p = 2 ; q = 4

Step-by-step explanation:

Given tbe equation :

3p + 2q = 14 - - - (1)

10p + 6q = 44 - - -(2)

What is p and what is q

This is a simultaneous equation ; using elimination method :

Multiply (1) by 6 and (2) by 2

18p + 12q = 84 - - - - (3)

20p + 12q = 88 - - - (4)

Subtract (3) and (4)

-2p = - 4

p = 4/2

p = 2

Put p = 2 in (1)

3p + 2q = 14

3(2) + 2q = 14

6 + 2q = 14

2q = 14 - 6

2q = 8

q = 8/2

q = 4

p = 2 ; q = 4

Answer:

You can go ahead with this!

Step-by-step explanation:

Option A

Is the write answer

Answer:

The p-value of the test is 0.1017, which is greater than the standard significance level of 0.05, which means that this is not good evidence that the mean real compensation μ of all CEOs increased that year.

Step-by-step explanation:

At the null hypothesis, we test if there was no increase, that is, the mean is 0, so:

[tex]H_0: \mu = 0[/tex]

At the alternative hypothesis, we test if there was an increase, that is, the mean is greater than 0, so:

[tex]H_1: \mu > 0[/tex]

The test statistic is:

[tex]t = \frac{X - \mu}{\frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}}[/tex]

In which X is the sample mean, [tex]\mu[/tex] is the value tested at the null hypothesis, s is the standard deviation and n is the size of the sample.

0 is tested at the null hypothesis:

This means that [tex]\mu = 0[/tex]

104 companies, adjusted for inflation, in a recent year. The mean increase in real compensation was x¯=6.9%, and the standard deviation of the increases was s=55%.

This means that [tex]n = 104, X = 6.9, s = 55[/tex]

Value of the test-statistic:

[tex]t = \frac{X - \mu}{\frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}}[/tex]

[tex]t = \frac{6.9 - 0}{\frac{55}{\sqrt{104}}}[/tex]

[tex]t = 1.28[/tex]

P-value of the test:

The p-value of the test is a right-tailed test(test if the mean is greater than a value), with 104 - 1 = 103 df and t = 1.28.

Using a t-distribution calculator, this p-value is of 0.1017.

The p-value of the test is 0.1017, which is greater than the standard significance level of 0.05, which means that this is not good evidence that the mean real compensation μ of all CEOs increased that year.

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  ≈ 1000√10∠-129.04464° = -1992 -2456i

Step-by-step explanation:

  3 -i = √(3³+(-1)²)∠arctan(-1/3) ≈ √10∠-18.4349°

Then (3-i)^7 = 10^(7/2)∠(7×-18.4349°) = 1000√10∠-129.04464°

  = 1000√10(cos(-129.04464°) +i·sin(-129.04464°))

  = -1992 -2456i

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  a) yes

  b) see attached

  c) see discussion

  d) neither

  e) increasing (2,5); decreasing (-2, 2)

Step-by-step explanation:

a) The graph passes the vertical line test, so is the graph of a function.

__

b) A table of values is attached

__

c) Generally, this sort of function would be defined piecewise:

  [tex]\displaystyle f(x)=\begin{cases}-\dfrac{1}{2}x+1&\text{for }-2\le x<2\\2x-4&\text{for }2\le x \le5\end{cases}[/tex]

In the attachment, we have shown the use of the "maximum" function to define it. The effect is the same.

__

d) The function has no symmetry about the origin or the y-axis, so is neither odd nor even.

__

e) The function is increasing where the line has positive slope, on the interval (2, 5). The function is decreasing where the line has negative slope, on the interval (-2, 2).

Answer:

Point A:

(3, -5)

Point B:

(6, -2)

Point C:

(5, -7)

Step-by-step explanation:

Background:

Moving to the right means adding to the x.

Moving to the left means subtracting from the x.

Moving up means adding to the y.

Moving down means subtracting from the y.

So take each point and add 3 to the x, and subtract 4 from they y.

Point B:

(3, 2) → (6, -2)

Point A:

(0, -1) → (3, -5)

Point C:

(2, -3) → (5, -7)

Answer:

A: x = 0

B: x = All real numbers

Step-by-step explanation:

A.

Any number to the power of (0) equals one. This applies true for the given situation; one is given an expression which is as follows;

[tex](6^2)^x=1[/tex]

Simplifying that will result in;

[tex]36^x=1[/tex]

As stated above, any number to the power of (0) equals (1), thus (x) must equal (0) for this equation to hold true.

[tex]36^0=1\\x=0[/tex]

B.

As stated in part (A), any number to the power (0) equals (1). Therefore, when given the following expression;

[tex](6^0)^x=1[/tex]

One can simplify that;

[tex]1^x=1[/tex]

However, (1) to any degree still equals (1). Thus, (x) can be any value, and the equation will still hold true.

[tex]x=All\ real \ numbers[/tex]

Answer:

this would look like

0.5x+x=165

1.5x=165

x=110

Hope This Helps!!!

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

B looks like it would work.

You add speeds * time when you are travelling in opposite directions.

I don't know why you would add or subtract 1 as in A and C

120 * t = 540

t = 540/120

t = 4.5 hours.

So after 4.5 hours they are 540 miles apart.

Answer:

b

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

determine the number of miles the car drives in a year.

divide that number by the cars average MPG (miles per gallon) then multiply that number by the average cost of a gallon of gas in your area.

Step-by-step explanation: