For the amendment process the constitution specifies a three-fourths majority for just one process.
Under the congressional proposal procedure, an amendment must be proposed by two-thirds of each chamber of Congress. Then, three-fourths of state conventions or state legislatures, as determined by Congress, must approve the proposed amendment. An illustration of each method for submitting and approving an amendment.
The Constitution was approved with the support of nine states. Six months were allotted to each state for meetings and votes on the proposed Constitution. Delaware was the first state to approve it or ratify it on December 7, 1787.
To know more about Constitution, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/19411179
#SPJ4
which best characterizes the political system in china?
China has one party System. The Chinese Communist Party is the sole source of political authority in the People's Republic of China, which is governed by the autocratic Government of the People's Republic of China (CCP). The correct option is A.
It is an authoritarian system in China. The CCP controls all religious activities, there are no duly elected national leaders, political opposition is repressed, dissent is not allowed, and civil rights are restricted. China has a one-party authoritarian political system, which governs elections.
Since the implementation of Deng Xiaoping's economic reforms, China has had what economists refer to as a socialist market economy—one in which market capitalism and private ownership coexist alongside a significant state-owned businesses sector.
The complete Question is-
Which best characterizes the political system in china?
A) China has one - party system
B) China has Multi- Party System
C) Elections are not conducted in China
D) None of the above.
To know more about China , click here:
https://brainly.com/question/9695945
#SPJ4
the federal information security management act (fisma) of 2014 defines the roles, responsibilities, accountabilities, requirements, and practices that are needed to fully implement fisma security controls and requirements. true or false
It is correct to mention that the Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA), 2014 has given the definition of roles, responsibilities, accountabilities, requirements, and practices that are necessary to implement the FISMA security controls and requirements. Therefore, the statement is true.
FISMA, or Federal Information Security Management Act, was brought into enforcement in the year 2014 with a primary intention of assisting and authorizing the requirements needed for the implementation of the security controls made specific thereunder.
Learn more about FISMA here:
https://brainly.com/question/30167395
#SPJ4
You find an article that is appropriate for your topic in a journal produced byundergraduate students. What could be a problem with this source?Select one: A. Relevance to your topic B. Accuracy of information C. Quality of author and publication D. Up-to-date information
B. Accuracy of information. The information contained in the article may not have been thoroughly fact-checked
A problem with the source could be the accuracy of information as journal articles produced by undergraduate students may not undergo the same level of peer-review and editorial oversight as articles published in professional or academic journals. The information contained in the article may not have been thoroughly fact-checked or reviewed by experts in the field, which could lead to inaccuracies or misunderstandings. While such articles can still provide useful information, it is important to critically evaluate their sources and be cautious when using them to make decisions or support arguments. It is also recommended to consult multiple sources and cross-reference information to verify its accuracy
Learn more about Accuracy here:
https://brainly.com/question/28482209
#SPJ4
the american counseling association uses the term ""nonprofessional relationships"" when referring to dual or multiple relationships.
The given statement "The American counseling association uses the term "nonprofessional relationships" when referring to dual or multiple relationships" is true.
Dual partnerships describe a scenario in which a therapist and a client play several roles. A dual relationship is one in which a client is also a friend or family member, for instance.
Ethics rules alone can fix many relationship problems. You will have a solid basis for establishing healthy boundaries with clients if you are effective at setting limits in numerous areas of your personal life. A client might gain from a boundary crossing.
The complete question is-
The American counseling association uses the term "nonprofessional relationships" when referring to dual or multiple relationships.
True/False.
To know more about American, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/2600449
#SPJ4
the stages through which a lawsuit passes is called the __ process. a case
The stages through which a lawsuit passes is commonly referred to as the "litigation process." It typically consists of the following steps:Filing a Complaint.
Service of Process: This step involves serving the defendant with a copy of the complaint and a summons, which notifies them of the lawsuit and the requirement to respond.Answer to Complaint: After being served, the defendant has a specified period of time to respond to the complaint, either by filing an answer or a motion to dismiss.Discovery: This stage involves the exchange of information and evidence between the parties to build their cases. This can include document requests, depositions, and interrogatoriesPretrial Motions: Both parties may file motions to resolve specific legal issues before trial, such as a motion for summary judgment or a motion to exclude evidence.Trial: If the case has not been resolved through a settlement or motion, it will proceed to trial, where both sides will present their evidence and arguments to a judge or jury.Appeal: If either party is unhappy with the outcome of the trial, they may file an appeal to a higher court.The length of the litigation process can vary greatly depending on the complexity of the case, the jurisdiction in which it is filed, and the availability of the court.
To learn more about lawsuit click the link below:
brainly.com/question/30392587
#SPJ4
carl is a 45-year old divorced father of two minor children. he owns a house that he shares with his common-law spouse. if carl dies intestate, what statement is true?
Carl's common-law partner would not be qualified to receive any of his estate unless they are specifically included in a will or other legal document.
Most likely, his two young children would inherit the most of his estate. A person with the legal right to receive an inheritance from ancestors who passed away without leaving a will is known as an heir (known as intestate). When such a property owner passes away, their legal successors will need to handle matters including property inheritance and other claims. In the event of a divorce, the wife will no longer have any claim to the property and will become the sole owner of all of its contents.
To know more about legal document refer to the link below :
brainly.com/question/29368022
#SPJ4
Duff reported that the due process model does not agree with the majority of cases in which criminal are sanctioned for their crimes
The due process model is a form of model in the criminal justice system while deciding the guilt of the accused in the entire process.
The formal framework is the cornerstone of the due process model. The due process model safeguards the rights of defendants accused of various offences when applied properly.
the effect of many mistakes that happen throughout the investigation, arrest, gathering of evidence, and trial are mitigated by the due process paradigm.
However, Duff believes that this model is not sufficient for the best interests of the accused. There are numerous elements and reasons why most of the evidence presented in criminal cases is not supported by due process.
The due process paradigm essentially condemns all types of evidence with the exception of undeniable physical evidence that cannot be refuted.
In the due process concept, examining the evidence is intended to determine what information may be false, inaccurate, or obtained under duress from a person.
To know more about due process model click here:
https://brainly.com/question/11591373
#SPJ4
The question is incomplete. The complete question is:
Duff reported that the due process model does not agree with the majority of cases in which criminal are sanctioned for their crimes. What is meant by the due process model?
in trey's december 31 year-end balance sheet, what amount should be reported as total current assets?
The information regarding Trey's December 31 year-end balance sheet. The amount reported as total current assets would depend on the specific assets and their values that Trey had on that date.
Estimated tax payments of $300,000 were charged to prepaid taxes in 2001. Income tax expense has not yet been recorded. Trey's tax rate is 30%, so there were no differences between his financial statement and his income tax income.
Included in A/R is a $500k debt owed by a customer. This customer's special terms require payment in equal semiannual installments of $125,000 on April 1 and October 1.
What amount should be reported as total current assets on Trey's balance sheet as of December 31, 20X1
The correct answer is 1,950K.
To learn more about Trey's December 31 balance sheet here:
https://brainly.com/question/29765781
#SPJ4
procedural rule here, or is the court making a statement about the substantive law?
Court is making a state-ment about the substantive law. Substantive laws are the stat-utory laws pass-ed by the legislature. Where-as, procedural laws com-prise the rules and pro-cesses which any court follows for hear-ing and deter-mining the cases.
Substantive law is a statutory law that de-als with the legal relationship bet-ween people or the peo-ple and the state. Procedural law con-sists of the set of rules that govern the proceed-ings of the court in criminal law-suits as well as civil and adminis-trative proceed-ings.
Substantive law is an indepen-dent set of laws that de-cide the fate of a case. Procedural laws on the ot-her hand, have no independ-ent existence.
To know more about substantive law click below:
brainly.com/question/4233831
#SPJ4
common self regulation practice when driving
Typical self-regulation driving techniques include- minimizing nighttime driving driving less when it's terrible outside. selecting routes to avoid traffic jams, roadwork, and challenging traffic conditions.
Self-regulation, or altering driving behaviour by avoiding risky circumstances or driving less as a result of deteriorating abilities, is being researched more and more as a strategy to support older drivers in maintaining their independence and extending the amount of time they can safely drive.
Cell phone use and distracted driving are two of the main and most frequent causes of traffic accidents. Driving while intoxicated or under the influence of drugs or alcohol (ie: alcohol, prescription drugs, cannabis etc.)
To know more about Driving, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/25351775
#SPJ4
The brave men living and dead who struggled here, have consecrated it far above our poor power to add or detract. The world will little note, nor long remember what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here. Lincoln uses this moment to help the country make sense of the severe loss of life.
why was The Federal Drug Administration was created
Explanation:
Because they prohibited the sale of misbranded or adulterated food and drugs in interstate commerce and laid a foundation for the nation's first consumer protection agency, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
Toenforce the Pure Food and Drug Act of 1906
FDA is supposed to make sure food & medicine aren't misbranded or adulterated
library.weill.cornell.edu
visitthecapitolgov
In which of the following situations would ONLY state law apply? a. A state constitution was recently amended to allow the segregation of its public schools. b. A group of protestors gather peacefully on state capitol grounds to protest abortion, c. Jim and John Brown want to form the Two Brothers Cleaning and Janitorial Company, Inc. and do business in Maryland d. Sam and Samantha need to file bankruptcy to get their Colorado medical debts
The appropriate answer is C. Jim and John Brown want to form the Two Brothers Cleaning and Janitorial Company, Inc. and do business in Maryland.
Before the Supreme Court's decision in McCulloch v. Maryland, it was disputed whether state laws may conflict with those of the federal government.
Separating Mexican American students from other students in schools would be against federal and Californian law. Eight years before Brown v. Board of Education, the Supreme Court determined in Mendez v. Westminster that segregated schools were unfair. The evidence that Mexican American youngsters were struggling to acquire English due to lack of exposure was largely relied upon by the court. In Brown v. Board of Education, the Supreme Court of the United States finally outlawed segregated schools nationwide because it believed that such schools violated the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment because they were inherently unequal, even if they had comparable facilities, teachers, and resources. In every state, segregated schools are against the law.
Learn more about Brown v. Board of Education here:
https://brainly.com/question/14010839
#SPJ4
A defendant on trial for burglary planned to raise in his defense that his arrest was a result of racial profiling. During voir dire, the prosecutor exercised his peremptory challenges to exclude all nonwhite jurors, not just those of the defendant's race, from the jury panel. When the defendant objected to these challenges as racially discriminating, the prosecutor responded that he was concerned that nonwhite jurors would unfairly side with the defense's argument that the police unjustly profiled the defendant. Should the court sustain the defendant's objection?
No, the judge should not sustain the defendant's objection because the defendant did not specifically invoke his Fifth Amendment right to counsel.
The judge should not sustain the defendant's objection in this instance, as the defendant did not specifically invoke his Fifth Amendment right to counsel. The Fifth Amendment guarantees that an individual cannot be compelled to provide testimony that could be used to incriminate them.
If a defendant invokes their Fifth Amendment right to counsel, the court must ensure that the individual is afforded proper legal counsel. In this case, however, the defendant has not invoked their right to counsel and the judge should not sustain the objection.
To know more about defendant, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/14167307
#SPJ4
Defendant is on trial for armed bank robbery. He wishes to testify about his alibi, but he has two prior criminal convictions: (1) a misdemeanor conviction for filing a false police report 15 years ago; and (2) a felony robbery conviction from 11 years ago. Defendant spent three years in prison for the robbery.
Which, if either, of these convictions is admissible against him?
A. Both are admissible only if the court finds that their probative value substantially outweighs their prejudicial effect.
B. Both crimes are admissible if their probative value outweighs their prejudicial effect.
C. The false police report is automatically admissible; the robbery is admissible only if its probative value substantially outweighs its prejudicial effect.
D. The false police report is admissible only if its probative value substantially outweighs its prejudicial effect; the robbery is admissible if its probative value outweighs its prejudicial effect.
In the given situation, it may be stated that the false report made by the defendant is admissible only when the probative value substantially outweighs the prejudicial effect; the robbery is admissible if its probative value outweighs the prejudicial effect. Therefore, the option D holds true.
A defendant may be referred to or considered as a person who is held against a charge in the court of law. He or she has to defend the charges made against him or her by the plaintiff. A plaintiff, on the other hand, is the one makes the charges against the defendant.
Learn more about a defendant here:
https://brainly.com/question/14167307
#SPJ4
A group unhappy with the draft distributes a memo to members encouraging physical confrontations with draft agents. The leaders of the group are promptly arrested. Which of the following Supreme Court cases best justifies the actions taken by law enforcement in this scenario?
A. Schneck v. US
B. Wisconson v. Yoder
C. Mapp v. OH
D. Brandenburg v. OH
when using stare decisis, judges in future cases are most likely to follow the _____ in prior cases
When using stare decisis, judges in future cases are most likely to follow the precedent in prior cases.
In the legal system, a precedent is a court's ruling or decision. It is used as an illustration or analogy to support a judgement on a related case or legal issue.
In the early history of equity the court technically had freedom from precedent. Today, however, common law and equity, as found in the English and American legal systems, rely heavily on the body of established precedents.
The stare decisis principle came into use at the close of the 19th century.
A case cannot serve as precedent if the circumstances or issues in the case are different from those in the precedent case.
Because of this, a previous ruling only applies to issues that the court specifically took into account while making its decision.
To know more about precedent, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/2033336
#SPJ4
what is the responsibility of real estate personnel to access, read, interpret and apply legislation to their real estate activity?
Determine your personal responsibility for gaining access to, reading, understanding, and applying the law to real estate activities. Recognize and use methods for obtaining current and historical legislation.
What is real estate?Real estate is any immovable property of this kind that has a stake in a piece of land, a building, or housing in general. It also includes the natural resources on the land, such as water, crops, minerals, and minerals.
In legal terminology, real refers to real property, which is distinct from personal property, and estate refers to a person's "interest" in that real property.
Real estate is distinct from personal property, which includes things like cars, yachts, jewels, furniture, equipment, and a farm's rolling stock but is not affixed to the land permanently.
Single-family homes or multifamily buildings on residential real estate may be occupied or used for non-commercial purposes.
Learn more about real estate, here
https://brainly.com/question/17150470
#SPJ1
which type of institution operates through laws and regulations to influence behavior?
Formal Institutions operates through laws and regulations to influence behavior.
Written rules and regulations that are to be put into effect in order to legally create a nation and stabilise the economy have been publicly adopted by formal institutions, defining the regulator pillar that is intended to regulate both corporate and individual behaviour.
The costs of conducting business are decreased by institutions that support economic growth. The expenses cover transaction fees including those for searching for and gathering information, haggling and making decisions, and maintaining law and order.
To know more about Institutions, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/13333686
#SPJ4
what did the democratic nations do in response
A democratic country has a system of government that gives citizens the power to shape public policies. Every democracy is unique and operates in a distinctive way.
Voting on proposed laws and policies allows individuals in various democracies to directly influence decision-making (direct democracy).Freedom of assembly, association, property rights, freedom of expression, inclusivity and equality, citizenship, consent of the governed, voting rights, freedom from arbitrary state deprivation of the right to life and liberty, and minority rights are frequently characteristics of democracies. Those in charge of a democratic nation, government, or political system are chosen by the electorate. Democracies must uphold the values of liberty, respect for human rights, and regular, legal elections of all eligible voters.
To learn more about democratic click the link below:
brainly.com/question/14320124
#SPJ4
Hasan is missing his normal equipment but needs to transport a bullet from the crime. In an attempt to protect the bullet, which process would be BEST to use?
fold it in a clean piece of paper
put it in a pocket
wrap it in a towel
wrap it in plastic wrap
The best process for Hassan to use to transport the bullet from the crime would be to D. Wrap it in plastic wrap.
Why should Hassan wrap the bullet ?Wrapping the bullet in plastic wrap would be the best option to protect it from contamination, as it provides a barrier from any external substances that could compromise the integrity of the evidence.
Hassan would therefore be best protected from evidence tampering if he wrapped the bullet in a plastic bag and then transported it to his police department or other relevant evident analysis unit.
Find out more on preserving evidence at https://brainly.com/question/24667539
#SPJ1
identify the true statements about the sale of patent medicines in the united states during the late 19th and early 20th centuries.
Out of the given statements, the statement, ''psychoactive substances were freely available from a variety of different sources,'' is true about the sale of patent medicine in the United States of America in the years during the late nineteenth and early 20th centuries. Therefore, the option A holds true.
The psychoactive substances had an abundance of availability during the 19th and 20th centuries. This situation came to the rise, as the demand for patent medicines grew rapidly during this period. Moreover, the supply and production capacities were also sufficient to fulfill the market demand in the United States of America.
Learn more about patent medicine here:
https://brainly.com/question/25749134
#SPJ4
Complete question
Identify the true statements about the sale of patent medicines in the United States during the late 19th and early 20th centuries.
A. Psychoactive substances were freely available from a variety of different sources.
B. Psychoactive substances had a lot of shortage during the 19th and 20th centuries
C. Both A and B
D. None of the above
case file documents for Case v. Spend Less Foods Matter. The case file documents are located in Appendix A. After reviewing the case file documents, what terms would you search to find law on this case? How would you phrase the legal issue for this matter?
Answer:
To find law on this case, I would search for terms related to the specific legal issues present in the case file documents. These terms might include keywords such as "breach of contract," "unfair business practices," or "consumer protection." I would also search for case law or statutes related to the specific state or jurisdiction in which the case is taking place.
The legal issue in this case, as it appears from the case file documents, seems to be a dispute between the plaintiff, Case, and the defendant, Spend Less Foods, over a breach of contract and/or unfair business practices. Specifically, it appears that Case is alleging that Spend Less Foods did not fulfill their end of a contract or engaged in business practices that are unjust or oppressive to consumers. The exact phrasing of the legal issue would depend on the specific facts and arguments presented in the case file documents.
what is the quality policy of the university of rizal system and explain.
The quality policy of the university of rizal system is to continuously improve its quality management system processes to satisfy all applicable requirements commits to deliver excellent products- services.
In the small city of Tanay Calabarzon, An University of Rizal System is a non-profit public higher-education institution founded in 2001. The core values of Rizal system are courteous, considerate, integerate and responsibility.
Mission and vision of rizal secret mission was to observe the culture, laws, governments and lives of the countries in Europe.The message of Rizal is primarily to tell the importance of their capability to shape the future of our Motherland.
Learn more about Rizal System click on the link here:
https://brainly.com/question/16989421
#SPJ4
Individual state laws (vary by state) that provides legal recourse or some form of remedy to consumers when a product does not meet basic quality and performance standards. In most states, a car qualifies as a lemon if it has a substantial defect that is under warranty and has not been repaired after a reasonable number of attempts.
A) Obligatory Agreement
B) Lemon laws
C) Junk Law
D) Damaged Deed Agreement
E) Potential Damage Warranty
Lemon laws are regulations that attempt to protect consumers in the event in which when a product does not meet basic quality and performance standards.
Lemon laws are laws that are designed to protect consumers from being taken advantage of by businesses. These laws attempt to ensure that products meet basic quality and performance standards, and if they do not, the consumer is given some form of compensation or remedy.
Lemon laws vary from state to state, but generally they provide consumers with the right to return a product or receive a refund if it does not meet the required standards. Lemon laws are an important part of consumer protection and can help ensure that businesses are held accountable for the products they sell.
Hence, the correct option is "B".
To know more about laws, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/6590381
#SPJ4
a husband from state a filed a divorce action against his wife, a citizen of state b, in state a federal court. the husband asked the court to divide the marital estate valued at $2,755,000. the couple lived in state b at all times during the marriage. the wife had never been to state a before the lawsuit was filed. the wife answered the husband's complaint without asserting any affirmative defenses or filing any additional motions. two years into the lawsuit, after discovery had been completed and four days before trial, the wife filed a motion to dismiss, asserting that the court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction over the husband's claims.
If a husband from State A files a divorce action against his wife from State B, in State A federal court: C: Yes; the court may grant the wife's motion, on the ground that the district court in State A lacks subject-matter jurisdiction.
May the court grant the wife's motion to dismiss?In this scenario, the wife is arguing that the court in State A does not have the authority or jurisdiction to hear the divorce case and divide the marital estate.
The motion to dismiss is being filed after two years into the lawsuit and just before the trial, which may indicate that the wife is trying to challenge the jurisdiction of the court at a late stage in the proceedings.
The outcome of this motion will depend on the specific laws and regulations of State A and the facts of the case. If the court agrees with the wife, it may dismiss the case, meaning the husband will have to file the divorce action in a court in State B. If the court denies the motion, it will proceed with hearing the case and dividing the marital estate.
Therefore the correct option is C.
Learn more about legal case here:https://brainly.com/question/25903338
#SPJ1
The complete question is:
A husband from State A files a divorce action against his wife from State B, in State A federal court. In the action, the husband asks the court to divide the marital estate valued at $2,755,000. The couple lived in State B at all times during the marriage. The wife had never been to State A before the lawsuit was filed. The wife answered the husband's complaint, asserting no affirmative defenses and filing no motions. Two years into the lawsuit - after discovery had been completed, and 4 days before trial - the wife filed a motion to dismiss, asserting that the court lacks subjectmatter jurisdiction over the husband's claims. May the court grant the wife's motion to dismiss?
A: Yes; the court may grant the wife's motion, on the ground that the district court in State A lacks personal jurisdiction.
B: No; the court may not grant the wife's motion, because she waived any affirmative defense by failing to raise it in her answer to her husband's complaint.
C: Yes; the court may grant the wife's motion, on the ground that the district court in State A lacks subject-matter jurisdiction.
D: No; the court may not grant the wife's motion, because her motion to dismiss was not timely.
a federal statute provides that the cities in which certain specified airports are located may regulate the rates and services of all limousines that serve those airports, without regard to the origin or destination of the passengers who use the limousines. true or false
A federal statute provides that the cities in which certain specified airports are located may regulate the rates and services of all limousines that serve those airports. The given statement is true.
Redville and Greenville are cities in different states that are close to each other. The airport that serves both of them is located in Redville and is one of those designated by federal law.
The Redville City Council has enacted a law requiring any limousine serving the airport to charge only the Redville City Council-approved prices.
Airline Limousine Service does a profitable business transporting passengers between Greenville and the Redville airport at significantly lower prices than those mandated by the Redville City Council.
It solely carries passengers interstate; it does not provide local service within Redville. The Redville City Council's new ordinance would require Airline Limousine Service to charge the same prices as taxis.
To know more about federal statute:
https://brainly.com/question/30356979
#SPJ4
At the Philadelphia Convention, the proposed plan to create a Congress where representation was distributed according to population was called the ________ Plan.
At the Philadelphia Convention, the proposed plan to create a Congress where representation was distributed according to population was called the Virrginia Plan.
The convention held at Philadelphia is considered as a significant event in the American political history. It was undertaken in the year 1787, which was a decade after the American independence. During this convention, James Madison had made a proposition to form a strong federal government in the United States. This government consisted of three different branches, as proposed under the Virrginia Plan.
Learn more about the Philadelphia Convention here:
https://brainly.com/question/11862692
#SPJ4
Explain the concept of collective efficacy. What impact does it have on crime in a neighborhood?
Answer:
Collective efficacy refers to a community's shared belief in its ability to take action and produce desired outcomes. It is a measure of social cohesion and mutual trust within a community, and is often used to assess the effectiveness of community-level interventions to reduce crime and improve safety.
Collective efficacy has been shown to have a strong impact on crime in a neighborhood. Research has found that neighborhoods with high levels of collective efficacy tend to have lower crime rates, and that collective efficacy is a stronger predictor of crime than other social and economic factors. This is because communities with high levels of collective efficacy are better able to mobilize resources and take action to address crime and disorder, and are less likely to tolerate criminal behavior.
Additionally, neighborhoods with high collective efficacy tend to have more active and effective community organizations and higher levels of social capital, which can also contribute to reducing crime. Studies have also found that collective efficacy is positively associated with civic engagement, collective action and social control, which are key factors in preventing crime.
Overall, collective efficacy is an important concept in understanding crime in a neighborhood, as it highlights the importance of social cohesion and trust in addressing crime and promoting safety.
what took place after male indentured servants completed their terms of service?
After male indentured servants completed their terms of service they discovered that they were ill-equipped and unprepared for freedom. They frequently did not get what was promised to them.
Some servants who were free men at the beginning of the century were able to acquire their own land. But by 1660, the big landowners had seized much of the best land. Where the mountainous territory was less arable and the threat from Indians was persistent, the former servants were sent west.
Indentured servitude was supplanted by slavery in the colonies in the 1660s as the cost of owning slaves decreased for landowners. The Chesapeake and Southern colonies' life expectancy had improved, which meant that indentured workers were living long enough to complete their indentured periods.
To know more about Servants, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/10854124
#SPJ4
