Answer:
a) Current ratio for Kansas company is 1.475
Current ratio for Montana company is 1.814
b) Since the current ratio for the Montana company is more than that of the Kansas company which shows better liquidity, the Montana company has the greater likelihood of being able to pay its bills.
c) Kansas company would produce the higher return-on-assets ratio.
Explanation:
Current Assets Current liabilities
Kansas Company $ 59,000 $ 40,000
Montana Company $ 78,000 $ 43,000
a) To calculate the current ratio of A company
Current ratio = [tex]\frac{Current Assets}{Current Liabilities}[/tex]
Therefore current ratio for Kansas company = $ 59,000 ÷ $ 40,000 = 1.475
Current ratio for Montana company = $ 78,000 ÷ $ 43,000 = 1.814
As of December 31, 2019, Sheridan Company had $3500 of raw materials inventory. At the beginning of 2019, there was $3000 of materials on hand. During the year, the company purchased $315000 of materials; however, it paid for only $252500. How much inventory was requisitioned for use on jobs during 2019
Answer: $314,500
Explanation:
When calculating how much of a material of any sort was used, the following formula should be used,
= Beginning inventory + Purchases - Ending inventory
This is the same formula largely used to calculate Cost of Goods sold.
Here, the figure to be concerned about is the actual materials used not the ones paid for.
Plugging in figures into the formula then,
= 3,000 + 315,000 - 3,500
= $314,500
Thus $314,500 was the inventory requisitioned for use on jobs during 2019.
P5-18 Calculating deposit needed. You put $10,000 in an account earning 5%. After 3 years, you make another deposit into the same account. Four years later (7 years after your original $10,000 deposit), the account balance is $20,000. What was the amount of the deposit at the end of year 3
Answer:
$4877.80
Explanation:
The computation of amount of the deposit at the end of year 3 is shown below:-
Future value = Present value × (1 + Rate of interest ÷ 100)^number of years
$20,000 = 10,000 × (1 + 5 ÷ 100)^7 + Deposit at end of year 3 × (1 + 5 ÷ 100)^4
$20,000 = 10,000 × (1.05)^7 + Deposit at end of year 3 × (1.05)^4
$20,000 = 14071.00423 + Deposit at end of year 3 × (1.05)^4
Deposit at end of year 3 = ($20,000 - 14071.00423 ) ÷ (1.05)^4
= $5928.995773 ÷ 1.21550625
= $4877.799496
or
= $4,877.80
We simply applied the above formula to find out the amount of deposit at the year 3 end
Mercredi, Inc., is considering investing in automated equipment with a ten-year useful life. Managers at Highpoint have estimated the cash flows associated with the tangible costs and benefits of automation, but have been unable to estimate the cash flows associated with the intangible benefits. Using the company's 14% required rate of return, the net present value of the cash flows associated with just the tangible costs and benefits is a negative $182,560. How large would the annual net cash inflows from the intangible benefits have to be to make this a financially acceptable investment? (Ignore income taxes.)
Answer:
$35,000
Explanation:
The computation of the annual net cash inflows from the intangible benefits is shown below:
= Tangibles cost and benefits ÷ PVIFA factor at 14% for 10 years
= $182,560 ÷ 5.2161
= $35,000
Refer to the PVIFA table
We simply divided the tangible cost from the PVIFA factor so that the correct amount could come
Suppose the top five firms in a market have market shares of 23%,12%,8%, 7% and 5% respectively. The remaining 45 firms in the market each have a market share of 1%. Would the FTC be likely to approve a merger between the top two firms in this market?
Answer: Yes, The FTC will approve the merger.
Explanation:
The Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is the common measure of market concentration used to determine market competitiveness. The HHI is calculated by the squaring of the market share of every firm competing in the market and then adding the resulting numbers
HHI (before the merger)
= 23² + 12² + 8² + 7² + 5² + 45 × 1²
= 529 + 144 + 64 + 49 + 25 + 45
= 856
HHI (after the merger) = (23 + 12)²
8² + 7² + 5² + 45 × 1² = 1408
Here, the market is less concentrated and the HHI is still below 1500 after the merger. Therefore, FTC will approve this merger. The answer is Yes.
A perfectly competitive firm is a: Group of answer choices price taker, because it must accept the market equilibrium price. price participant, because it can coordinate its pricing decisions with other firms. price maker, because it has the freedom to set the selling price. price leader; it can change its price and other firms will adjust.
Answer:
A. price taker, because it must accept the market equilibrium price.
Explanation:
A perfectly competitive firm is an ideal firm in which different firms sell products that are homogeneous or similar in nature. They are price takers because the prices of goods are determined by changes in demand and supply, therefore they must accept the market equilibrium price. They do not attempt to fix the prices of commodities. The opposite of this type of firm is a monopoly where a firm has complete control of a market, having the ability to change prices as it wills.
An example can be found among businesses that sell similar kinds of products. It could be in the form of grocery stores that sell similar wares. When any of the sellers leave the market, it does not affect the other sellers as their prices are at equilibrium. Therefore, anyone can enter or exit this type of market.
Wember Catering uses two measures of activity, jobs and meals, in the cost formulas in its budgets and performance reports. The cost formula for catering supplies is $400 per month plus $90 per job plus $10 per meal. A typical job involves serving a number of meals to guests at a corporate function or at a host's home. The company expected its activity in September to be 15 jobs and 145 meals, but the actual activity was 11 jobs and 142 meals. The actual cost for catering supplies in September was $2,710. The catering supplies in the planning budget for September would be closest to:
Answer:
The catering supplies in the planning budget for September would be closest to $3,200
Explanation:
In order to calculate the the catering supplies in the planning budget for September we would have to use the following formula:
catering supplies in the planning budget=The cost formula for catering supplies+cost per job×number of jobs+cost per meal×number of meals
catering supplies in the planning budget=($400+$90*15+145*$10) = $3,200
The catering supplies in the planning budget for September would be closest to $3,200
Darrin’s Auto Northern Division is currently purchasing a part from an outside supplier. The company's Southern Division, which has no excess capacity, makes and sells this part for external customers at a variable cost of $15 and a selling price of $27. If Southern begins sales to Northern, it (1) will use the general transfer-pricing rule and (2) will be able to reduce variable cost on internal transfers by $3. On the basis of this information, Southern would establish a transfer price of:
Answer:
Transfer price = $24
Explanation:
As per the data given in the question,
The excess capacity of Company's Southern division is nill therefore for transferring the units the division will have to decrease its external sales.The Loss occurred due to reduction in external sales should be from inter divisional transfer price. Therefore,
Transfer price = variable cost + Loss of contribution
= ($15 - $3) + ($27 - $15)
= $24
Beamish Inc., which produces a single product, has provided the following data for its most recent month of operations: Number of units produced 4,600 Variable costs per unit: Direct materials $ 91 Direct labor $ 85 Variable manufacturing overhead $ 7 Variable selling and administrative expense $ 10 Fixed costs: Fixed manufacturing overhead $ 161,000 Fixed selling and administrative expense $ 326,600 There were no beginning or ending inventories. The absorption costing unit product cost was:
Answer:
The answer is $ 218
Explanation:
Solution
Given that:
Description Amount
Direct materials $91
Direct labor $85
Variable manufacturing overhead $7
Fixed manufacturing overhead
( $ 161,000/ 4,600 units) $35
The unit product under absorption costing = $218
Therefore, the absorption costing unit product cost is $218
Which of the following statement is true? a. The demand for puma shoes is more elastic than the demand for shoes b. The demand for Cheerios is less elastic than the demand for cereal c. Products with many complements have a more elastic demand d. The demand for gas is more elastic in the short-run than in the long-r
Answer:
a. The demand for puma shoes is more elastic than the demand for shoes.
Explanation:
Price elasticity of demand refers to the degree of change in the desire to buy something when there arises a change in the price of the commodity. With the increase in the price of the commodity, the desire to buy the commodity decreases. The first statement is true among the given four statements. The demand for puma shoes is subjected to the price of it. While the demand for normal shoes can be kept under the basic requirement which is not elastic.
Use the following selected information from Wheeler, LLC to determine the 2017 and 2016 trend percentages for net sales using 2016 as the base.2017 2016Net sales $ 276,200 $ 231,400Cost of goods sold 151,900 129,590Operating expenses 55,240 53,240Net earnings 27,820 19,820Multiple Choice65.1% for 2017 and 64.6% for 2016.55.0% for 2017 and 56.0% for 2016.119.4% for 2017 and 100.0% for 2016.36.4% for 2017 and 41.1% for 2016.117.2% for 2017 and 100.0% for 2016.
Answer:
119.4% for 2017 and 100.0% for 2016.
Explanation:
2017 2016
Net sales $276,200 $231,400
Cost of goods sold $151,900 $129,590
Operating expenses $55,240 $53,240
Net earnings $27,820 $19,820
since we are using 2016 as a base year, the $231,400 in net sales represent 100%, so the trend percentage for 2017 = net sales 2017 / net sales 2016 $276,200 / $231,400 = 1.1936 = 119.4% or a 19.4% increase.
The base year's amount will always be 100% or 1, and the trend percentages will change relative to that year.
Answer:
turtle
Explanation:
Suppose Clifford recently discovered oil in his fields, which greatly excites him because he can earn a profit of $ 31.00 per barrel based on present market conditions. Because production costs will be lower in five years, Clifford estimates that he can pump the oil out at a profit of $ 49.00 per barrel if he chooses to wait. If the interest rate currently is 1.00 %, what is the present value of the oil if he waits five years?
Answer:
$46.62
Explanation:
Kindly check the attached picture for detailed explanation
Crane Corporation had the following 2020 income statement. Sales revenue $197,000 Cost of goods sold 124,000 Gross profit 73,000 Operating expenses (includes depreciation of $19,000) 48,000 Net income $25,000 The following accounts increased during 2020: Accounts Receivable $10,000, Inventory $10,000, and Accounts Payable $11,000. Prepare the cash flows from operating activities section of Crane’s 2020 statement of cash flows using the direct method.
Answer:
$35,000
Explanation:
Crane Corporation
CASH FLOW STATEMENT
FOR THE YEAR ENDING 2020
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Net Income $25,000
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation on Fixed Assets $19,000
(Increase) Decrease in Current Assets:
Accounts Receivable ($10,000)
Inventory ($10,000)
Increase (Decrease) in Current Liabilities:
Accounts Payable $11,000
Net Cash Provided by operating activities $35,000
Cash Flow from Investing Activities: -
Cash Flow from Financing Activities: -
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash $35,000
A work center uses kanban containers that hold 200 parts. To produce enough parts to fill a container, 60 minutes of setup plus run time are needed. Moving the container to the next workstation, waiting time, processing time at the next work station, and return of the empty container take 120 minutes. There is an overall demand rate of 10 units per minute. Calculate the number of containers needed for this process.
Answer:
9 containers
Explanation:
Data given
Container holds (capacity) = 200 units
Demand rate per minute = 10 units
The computation of number of containers needed is shown below:-
Time to fill container = Setup time + Processing time
= 60 + 120
= 180 minutes
Number of containers (n) = (Demand × Time to fill container) ÷ Capacity of the container
= (10 × 180) ÷ 200
= 1,800 ÷ 200
= 9 containers
Therefore for computing the number of containers we simply applied the above formula.
Dextra Computing sells merchandise for $15,000 cash on September 30 (cost of merchandise is $12,000). The sales tax law requires Dextra to collect 5% sales tax on every dollar of merchandise sold. Record the entry for the $15,000 sale and its applicable sales tax. Also record the entry that shows the payment of the 5% tax on this sale to the state government on October 15. View transaction list Journal entry worksheet Record the cost of September 30th sales. Note: Enter debits before credits Date General Journal Debit Credit Sep 30 Record entry Clear entry View general journal
Answer and Explanation:
The journal entries are shown below:
1. On Sep 30
Cash $15750
To Sales $15,000
To Sales taxes payable ($15000 ×5%) $750
(Being the cash receipts is recorded)
For recording this we debited the cash as it increased the assets and credited the sales and sales tax payable as it increased the revenue and liabilities
2 On Sep 30
Cost of goods sold $12,000
To Merchandise inventory $12,000
(Being the cost of goods sold is recorded)
For recording this we debited the cost of goods sold as it increased the expenses and credited the merchandise inventory as it reduced the assets
3 On Oct 15
Sales taxes payable $750
To Cash $750
(Being cash paid is recorded)
For recording this we debited the sales tax payable as it reduced the liabilities and credited the cash as it decreased the assets
You would like to retire in 30 years. The expected rate of inflation is 2% per year. You currently have a standard of living that requires $7940 of monthly expenses. Assuming you want to maintain the same standard of living in retirement, what are your monthly expenses expected to be the first year of retirement
Answer:
You would need $14,382.21 to maintain your purchasing power.
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
You would like to retire in 30 years. The expected rate of inflation is 2% per year. You currently have a standard of living that requires $7940 of monthly expenses.
The inflation rate has the same intrinsic behavior as an investment with a compounded interest rate.
We need to use the following formula:
FV= PV*(1+i)^n
FV= 7,940*(1.02^30)
FV= $14,382.21
You would need $14,382.21 to maintain your purchasing power.
Richard, a manager, has just received some bad news from his foreign counterpart about an ongoing negotiation. He is disturbed and is thinking of ways to control the damage. At the same time, a subordinate walks into his office and asks for an extended leave due to a family emergency. Richard refuses to grant leave despite it being an emergency situation. In this scenario, Richard’s disturbed mood is representative of _____ in the communication process between himself and his subordinate
Answer: Noise
Explanation:
In terms of communication process, noises is the factor which obstructs communication to take place between listener and speaker. This noise can be created through outside or external mode and internal mode
.Any outside sound like vehicle honking, loud speaker noise,etc can disrupt communication whereas internal thoughts,deep thinking etc while communicating interferes the process.
According to the question,Richard's mood is disturbed due to the bad news about foreign counterpart. So, due to his involvement in internal thoughts about foreign counterpart situation, Richard is not able to concentrate on subordinate's request of having family emergency leave and situation , so displays no understanding .Thus, communication is getting interrupted between him and subordinate due to noise in communication process.
he principle that suggests that the distribution of income should be based on the contribution made by individuals to society's total output is known as A. the functional distribution of income. B. the relative poverty standard. C. the productivity standard. D. the egalitarian principle. The productivity standard fails to yield an equal distribution of income because A. individuals have different abilities and skills. B. it is difficult to measure productivity accurately. C. richer countries have higher productivity than poorer countries. D. diminishing marginal productivity holds.
Answer:
The principle that suggests that the distribution of income should be based on the contribution made by individuals to society's total output is known as:
C. the productivity standard.The productivity standard fails to yield an equal distribution of income because:
A. individuals have different abilities and skills.Explanation:
Generally speaking, productivity refers to how many units of output we can produce by using X amount of units of inputs. The higher the output, the more productive we are.
The same principle is used by the productivity standard to allocate resources in a society. This is a basic doctrine of capitalism that believes that more work and more productivity should equal more income. That is why capitalistic countries tend to have unequal income distribution.
Majer Corporation makes a product with the following standard costs: Standard Quantity or Hours Standard Price or Rate Standard Cost Per Unit Direct materials 6.2 ounces $ 4.00 per ounce $ 24.80 Direct labor 0.5 hours $ 17.00 per hour $ 8.50 Variable overhead 0.5 hours $ 4.00 per hour $ 2.00 The company reported the following results concerning this product in February. Originally budgeted output 4,900 units Actual output 5,000 units Raw materials used in production 30,200 ounces Actual direct labor-hours 2,080 hours Purchases of raw materials 32,600 ounces Actual price of raw materials $ 67.10 per ounce Actual direct labor rate $ 57.60 per hour Actual variable overhead rate $ 5.80 per hour The company applies variable overhead on the basis of direct labor-hours. The direct materials purchases variance is computed when the materials are purchased. The variable overhead efficiency variance for February is:
Answer:
Variable overhead efficiency variance $1,680 Favorable
Explanation:
Variable overhead efficiency variance: Variable overhead efficiency variance aims to determine whether or not their exist savings or extra cost incurred on variable overhead as a result of workers being faster or slower that expected.
Since the variable overhead is charged using labour hours, any amount by which the actual labour hours differ from the standard allowable hours would result in a variance
Hours
5000 units should have taken (5000×0.5 hours) 2,500
but did take 2,080
Labour hours variance 420 favorable
Standard variable overhead rate ×$ 4.00 per hour
Variable overhead efficiency variance $1,680 Favorable
Grape Inc. uses the percentage of credit sales method of estimating doubtful accounts. The Allowance for Doubtful Accounts has an unadjusted credit balance of $3,500 and the company had $180,000 of net credit sales during the period. Grape has experienced bad debt losses of 4% of credit sales in prior periods. After making the adjusting entry for estimated bad debts, what is the ending balance in the Allowance for Doubtful Accounts accou
Answer:
$9,700
Explanation:
The calculation of ending balance in the Allowance for Doubtful Accounts account is shown below:-
Ending balance in the Allowance for Doubtful Accounts account = Net credit sales × Credit sales percentage + Credit balance
= $180,000 × 4% + $2,500
= $7,200 + $2,500
= $9,700
So, for computing the ending balance in the Allowance for Doubtful Accounts account we simply applied the above formula.
Goodmark Company produces two types of birthday cards: scented and regular. Expected product data for the coming year are given below. Overhead costs are identified by activity.
Scented Cards Regular Cards Total
Units produced 20,000 200,000 -
Prime costs $160,000 $1,500,000 $1,660,000
Direct labor hours 20,000 160,000 180,000
Number of setups 60 40 100
Machine hours 10,000 80,000 90,000
Inspection hours 2,000 16,000 18,000
Number of moves 180 120 300
Overhead costs:
Setting up equipment $240,000
Moving materials 120,000
Machine 200,000
Inspecting products 160,000
Calculate the activity consumption ratios for Scented cards (round to two decimal places).
Setups:
Moving materials:
Machining:
Inspection:
Answer:
Setups: $ 144,000
Moving materials: $72000
Machining: $22,200
Inspection: $17,777.78
Explanation:
Goodmark Company
Scented Cards Regular Cards Total
Units produced 20,000 200,000 -
Prime costs $160,000 $1,500,000 $1,660,000
Direct labor hours 20,000 160,000 180,000
Number of setups 60 40 100
Machine hours 10,000 80,000 90,000
Inspection hours 2,000 16,000 18,000
Number of moves 180 120 300
First we find the rate by dividing the overhead costs with the corresponding cost driver as follows.
Overhead costs: Rate
Setting up equipment $240,000 = Setting up equipment / Number of setups=$240,000/100=2400
Moving materials 120,000 = Moving materials/Number of moves
120,000/300=400
Machine 200,000 = Machining/Machine hours
= 200,000/ 90,000=2.222
Inspecting 160,000 = Inspection/Inspection hours
= 160,000/18000= 8.89
Now we find the overhead applied to the scented cards by multiplying the rate to the corresponding overhead activity of the scented cards.
Activity Rate Scented Cards
Setups: 2400 2400*60=$ 144,000
Moving materials: 400 400*180= $72000
Machining: 2.22 2.22*10,000=$22,200
Inspection: 8.89 8.89*2000= $17,777.78
A pension plan is obligated to make disbursements of $1 million, $2 million, and $1 million at the end of each of the next three years, respectively. The annual interest rate is 10%. If the plan wants to fully fund and immunize its position, how much of its portfolio should it allocate to one-year zero-coupon bonds and perpetuities, respectively, if these are the only two assets funding the plan?
Answer:
Investment in Zero coupon bond=90.48%
Investment in perpetuity=9.52%
Explanation:
Check attachment
Bedrock Company reported a December 31 ending inventory balance of $412,000. The following additional information is also available: The ending inventory balance of $412,000 included $73,200 of consigned inventory for which Bedrock was the consignor. The ending inventory balance of $412,000 included $24,400 of office supplies that were stored in the warehouse and were to be used by the company's supervisors and managers during the coming year. Based on this information, the correct balance for ending inventory on December 31 is: Multiple Choice $303,000 $358,400 $387,600 $338,600 $241,000
Answer:
Bedrock Company
Ending Inventory is $387,600.
Explanation:
The inventory already includes the consigned inventory. Since, Bedrock the consignor, its inclusion is correct. In consignment accounting, consigned inventory belongs to the consignor, who is the legal owner. The consignee is only in physical possession and not the legal owner.
The ending inventory should not include office supplies since they would be used during the coming year.
Assess the benefits and drawbacks of the high-speed rail project. In your opinion, do benefits outweigh drawbacks, or vice versa? Why? Justify your answer. What are the implications of starting a project based on tenuous projections that may or may not come true 10 years from now? Could you justify the California high-speed rail project from the perspective of a massive public works initiative? In other words, what other factors enter into the decision of whether to pursue a high-speed rail project? Why are they important?
Answer:
The benefits of a High Speed Rail in California:
It becomes a feasible alternative to air travel, because it can be either cheaper, or even faster, since passengers do not have to spend as much time on a train station as they do on an airport.If demand is high enough, state highways can become less congested, because many people who would otherwise travel by car, would take a high speed train instead.Because the trains are electric, they are likely to help reduce pollution.The cons would be:
We cannot know for sure how many people would take the high speed trains. Demand could not be high enough to justify the cost.The line would be very costly.It could end up benefit only a small section of the population who would take the trains, or who travel often.I believe that the benefits outweigh the drawbacks, as can be seen in most countries where high speed lines have been made between large cities. For example, in Spain, the line between Madrid and Barcelona is profitable. The same would likely happen for a line between Los Angeles and San Francisco.
What are the implications of starting a project based on tenuous projections that may or may not come true 10 years from now?
If demand projections are tenous, there is always the possiblity that the high speed line could not be profitable. However, this risk can be lowered if the line is made between highly populated cities.
Could you justify the California high-speed rail project from the perspective of a massive public works initiative?
Yes, a high speed rail would be a project that could massively impact California. The benefits of its operation could outweight the cost.
In other words, what other factors enter into the decision of whether to pursue a high-speed rail project?
As I said before, the most important factor is to construct line between highly populated cities in order to reduce the risk of not having enough demand. It has been demonstrated around the world, in Spain, in Italy, in Japan, in China, that high speed lines that connect very populated regions, can be profitable.
The benefits of a High Speed confine California:
It becomes a feasible alternative to air, because it may be either cheaper, or perhaps faster since passengers don't must spend the maximum amount of time on a railroad terminal as they are doing at an airport.
High Speed Demand of CaliforniaIf demand is high enough, state highways can abate congested, because many of us who would otherwise locomote car, would take a high-speed train instead.
Because the trains are electric, they're likely to assist reduce pollution.
The cons would be: We cannot know obviously what percentage of people would take the high-speed trains. Demand couldn't be high enough to justify the price.
The line would be very costly.
It could find yourself benefit only a little section of the population who would take the trains, or who travel often.
I believe that the advantages outweigh the drawbacks, as are often seen in most countries where high-speed lines are made between large cities. for instance, in Spain, the road between Madrid and Barcelona is profitable. the identical would likely happen for a line between l. a. and urban center.
If demand projections are tenuous, there's always the possibility that the high-speed line couldn't be profitable. However, this risk will be lowered if the road is formed between highly populated cities.
Yes, a high-speed rail would be a project that might massively impact California. the advantages of its operation could out weight the value.
As I said before, the foremost important factor is to construct a line between highly populated cities to cut back the danger of not having enough demand. it's been demonstrated around the world, in Spain, in Italy, in Japan, in China, that top speed lines that connect very populated regions may be profitable.
Find out more information about High Speed Demand of California here:
https://brainly.com/question/6526734
The capital accounts of Heidi and Moss have balances of $90,000 and $65,000, respectively, on January 1, the beginning of the current fiscal year. On April 10, Heidi invested an additional $8,000. During the year, Heidi and Moss withdrew $40,000 and $32,000, respectively. Revenues were $540,000 and expenses were $420,000 for the year. The articles of partnership make no reference to the division of net income. Required: 1. Prepare a statement of partners' equity for the partnership of Heidi and Moss. If an amount box does not require an entry, leave it blank. Enter all amounts as positive numbers. Heidi and Moss Statement of Partners' Equity For the Year Ended December 31 Heidi Moss Total Capital, January 1 $ 90,000 $ 65,000 $ 155,000 Net income for the year 60,000 60,000 120,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ Withdrawals during the year Capital, December 31 $ 118,000 $ 93,000 $ 211,000 2. Journalize the entries to: Close the revenue and expenses account. Close the drawing accounts. If an amount box does not require an entry, leave it blank. a. Revenues 540,000 Heidi, Capital 540,000 Moss, Capital 420,000 Heidi, Capital 40,000 Moss, Capital Moss, Drawing b. Heidi, Capital 40,000 Moss, Capital 32,000 Heidi, Drawing 40,000 Moss, Drawing 32,000
Answer:
The statement and journal are attached
Explanation:
7. A generous benefactor pledges $1 million to The Smith Foundation, a NPO that promotes the arts. The gift is to be used to provide scholarships for talented musicians at a music camp operated by the Foundation. The gift was given in August 2006 to support the Summer 2007 music program. The Foundation Director argues that the gift is a conditional restricted gift and therefore cannot be recognized as revenue in 2006. The accountant argues that the gift is an unconditional restricted gift and must be recognized in the current year. What is the basis for the Director’s argument? What is the basis for the accountant’s argument? In your answer provide an explanation of the terms conditional, unconditional, restricted and unrestricted.
Answer:
What is the basis for the Director’s argument?
The director believes that this is a temporarily restricted contribution and therefore it should be classified as restricted and recognized in 2007 once it can be classified as unrestricted.What is the basis for the accountant’s argument?
Unconditional gifts or donations must be recognized when they are made, and since the money was received in 2006, it should be recognized then.Explanation:
I agree with the Director since this is a restricted donation, i.e. the donor established strict conditions for its use both in time and purpose. For it to be unconditional, the donor should have stated that the money could be used in the best way that the NPO considers and at any time. But instead it established that it must be used to provide scholarships to musicians during 2007.
Both a condition and a restriction exits:
the restriction refers to the time: 2007the condition refers to its use: scholarships for musiciansMargie Company produces a single product and has provided the following data concerning its most recent month of operations: Selling price $ 88 Units in beginning inventory 0 Units produced 5,200 Units sold 4,900 Units in ending inventory 300 Variable costs per unit: Direct materials $ 12 Direct labor $ 23 Variable manufacturing overhead $ 2 Variable selling and administrative expense $ 5 Fixed costs: Fixed manufacturing overhead $ 161,200 Fixed selling and administrative expense $ 63,700 The total contribution margin for the month under variable costing is:
Answer:
$225,400
Explanation:
The computation of total contribution margin under variable costing is shown below:-
Sales (4900 × $88) $431,200
Less:Variable cost
Direct material (4900 × $12) ($58,800)
Direct labor (4900 × 23) ($112,700)
Variable manufacturing overhead
(4900 × 2) ($9,800)
Variable selling and administrative
expenses (4900 × $5) ($24,500)
Total variable expenses ($205,800)
Contribution margin $225,400
Therefore the total contribution margin under variable costing is $225,400
The property appraisal district for Marin County has just installed new software to track residential market values for property tax computations. The manager wants to know the total equivalent cost of all future costs incurred when the three county judges agreed to purchase the software system. The system has an installation cost of $150,000 and an additional cost of $50,000 at year 10. The annual software maintenance cost is $5,000 for the first 4 years and $8,000 thereafter. If the new system will be used for the indefinite future, find the equivalent present value at a discount rate of 5%.
Answer:
Equivalent annual cost = $16,502.89
Explanation:
Equivalent annual cost = Present Value of cost / Annuity factor
Present value of cost:
PV of additional cost =50,000 ×1.05^(-10)=30,695.66
PV of maintenance cost
First four years= 5,000× (1-1.05^(-4))/0.05=17,729.75
From year 5 to infinity = (8,000/0.05)× 1.05^(-4)=131,632.39
PV of maintenance cost = 17,729.75 + 131,632.396= 149,362.14
PV of costs = 150,000 + 30,695.66 + 149,362.14= 330,057.8112
Annuity factor = 1/r = 1/0.05= 20
Equivalent annual cost = 330,057.8112 /20=$16,502.89
Equivalent annual cost = $16,502.89
The I-75 Carpet Discount Store has an annual demand of 10,000 yards of super shag carpet. The annual carrying cost for a yard of carpet is $0.75 and the ordering cost is $150. The carpet manufacturer normally charges the store $8 per yard for the carpet.; however, the manufacturer has offered a discount price of $6.50 per yard if the store will order 5,000 yards. How much should the store order, and what will be the total inventory cost for that order quantity?
Answer:
5 units and $2,175
Explanation:
a. The computation of the economic order quantity is shown below:
= [tex]\sqrt{\frac{2\times \text{Annual demand}\times \text{Ordering cost}}{\text{Carrying cost}}[/tex]
=[tex]\sqrt{\frac{2\times \text{10,000}\times \text{\$150}}{\text{\$0.75}}[/tex]
= 2,000 units
The total cost of ordering cost and carrying cost equals to
= Annual ordering cost + Annual carrying cost
= Purchase cost + Annual demand ÷ Economic order quantity × ordering cost per order + Economic order quantity ÷ 2 × carrying cost per unit
= 10,000 × $8 + 10,000 ÷ 2,000 × $150 + 2,000 ÷ 2 × $0.75
= 80,000 + $750 + $750
= $81,500
Now in case of ordering 5,000 yields at discount price of $6.50 the total cost is
= Purchase cost + Annual demand ÷ Economic order quantity × ordering cost per order + Economic order quantity ÷ 2 × carrying cost per unit
= 10,000 × $6.50 + 10,000 ÷ 5,000 × $150 + 5,000 ÷ 2 × $0.75
= $65,000 + 300 + $1,875
= $67,175
Therefore there will be 5 units should store at a time and cost of inventory is 300 + $1,875 = $2,175
Consider two independent firms, BU1 and BU2, which transact with each other through spot market transactions in a competitive market. In a typical year, BU1 incurs total costs of $2 million in producing goods that BU2 buys. BU2 would be willing to pay up to $7.5 million for these goods, but because of the competitive market, ends up paying $5 million. What is the value captured by BU1 from these transactions?
Answer:
Value captured by BU1 = $5.5 million
Explanation:
Given:
Two firm = BU1 , BU2
BU1 cost of production = $2 million
BU2 will able to pay up-to = $7.5 million
BU2 will pay = $5 million:
Find:
Value captured by BU1 = ?
Computation:
⇒ Value captured by BU1 = BU2 will able to pay up-to - BU1 cost of production
⇒ Value captured by BU1 = $7.5 million - $2 million
⇒ Value captured by BU1 = $5.5 million
Based on the information given the value captured by BU1 from these transactions is $3 million.
The value captured by the seller (BU1)
Seller value =Value BU1 is willing to sell -Value at which he sold
Where:
Value BU1 is willing to sell=$5 million
Value at which he sold=$2 million
Let plug in the formula
Seller value=$5 million-$2 million
Seller value= $3 million
Inconclusion the value captured by BU1 from these transactions is $3 million.
Learn more here:https://brainly.com/question/24170754
The following materials standards have been established for a particular product: Standard quantity per unit of output 5.3 pounds Standard price $ 14.10 per pound The following data pertain to operations concerning the product for the last month: Actual materials purchased 6,150 pounds Actual cost of materials purchased $ 63,780 Actual materials used in production 5,650 pounds Actual output 790 units The direct materials purchases variance is computed when the materials are purchased. What is the materials quantity variance for the month?The following materials standards have been established for a particular product: Standard quantity per unit of output 5.3 pounds Standard price $ 14.10 per pound The following data pertain to operations concerning the product for the last month: Actual materials purchased 6,150 pounds Actual cost of materials purchased $ 63,780 Actual materials used in production 5,650 pounds Actual output 790 units The direct materials purchases variance is computed when the materials are purchased. What is the materials quantity variance for the month?
Answer:
Direct material quantity variance= $20,628.3
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Standard quantity per unit of output 5.3 pounds
Standard price $14.10 per pound
Actual materials used in production 5,650 pounds
Actual output 790 units
To calculate the direct material quantity variance, we need to use the following formula.
Direct material quantity variance= (standard quantity - actual quantity)*standard price
Direct material quantity variance= (5.3*790 - 5,650)*14.1
Direct material quantity variance= $20,628.3
