Answer:
Secondary sources are articles, books, and other documents that interpret, summarize, or critique the evidence surrounding a historic event. For example: A book written by a historian is a secondary source.
6.What divisions within the white community and within the black community
existed throughout the ordeal? How did Melba's perspective change
Throughout the book?
In the white community, these divisions stemmed from differing attitudes toward racial integration. Within the black community, there were also divisions based on different approaches to achieving racial equality. Melba's perspective changed as she faced challenges and witnessed both the hatred and kindness of others.
Throughout the ordeal described in the book, there were divisions within both the white community and the black community. In the white community, these divisions stemmed from differing attitudes toward racial integration. Some individuals, like Melba's mother, were in favor of integration and believed in the importance of equality. However, there were also many white individuals who opposed integration and held deeply ingrained racist beliefs. These individuals often displayed hostility towards the black community and actively worked to maintain segregation.
Within the black community, there were also divisions based on different approaches to achieving racial equality. Some individuals advocated for peaceful protest and non-violence, while others believed in more aggressive tactics to fight against segregation and discrimination. These divisions were reflected in the actions and opinions of Melba and her fellow black students who were part of the Little Rock Nine.
Melba's perspective changed significantly throughout the book as she faced numerous challenges and experiences both the kindness and cruelty of others. Initially, she held a hopeful and optimistic view of integration, believing that it would lead to a better future for herself and her community. However, as she faced constant harassment and threats, her perspective became more realistic and cautious. She realized the depth of racism and the dangers that came with challenging the status quo.
Melba's perspective also changed as she witnessed the bravery and resilience of her fellow black students and the support they received from some white individuals. These experiences helped her find strength and determination to continue fighting for equality. Ultimately, her perspective evolved from one of idealism to a more nuanced understanding of the complexities of the racial divide in her community.
In conclusion, divisions within the white community and the black community existed throughout the ordeal described in the book. Melba's perspective changed as she faced challenges and witnessed both the hatred and kindness of others. Her evolving perspective reflected the complexities of the racial divide and the ongoing struggle for equality.
Know more about Racial equality here:
https://brainly.com/question/9415818
#SPJ8
When practicing the historical thinking skill of periodization, historians:
Answer:
Explanation:
When practicing the historical thinking skill of periodization, historians divide history into distinct periods based on significant events, developments, and changes that occurred during those times. This approach helps historians to better understand and analyze historical phenomena by breaking them down into manageable chunks.
Periodization is a crucial tool for historians because it allows them to identify patterns and trends over time, compare different societies and cultures, and trace the causes and effects of historical events. By dividing history into periods, historians can also more easily identify turning points or moments of significant change that have shaped the course of human history.
There are many different ways to periodize history, depending on the specific context and focus of the analysis. Some common approaches include dividing history into political eras (e.g., ancient, medieval, modern), cultural periods (e.g., Renaissance, Enlightenment), economic phases (e.g., agrarian, industrial), or technological revolutions (e.g., Bronze Age, Information Age).
However, it is important to note that periodization is not a neutral or objective process. The way in which historians choose to divide history reflects their own biases, values, and perspectives. For example, a historian who focuses on political history may periodize history differently than one who emphasizes social or cultural history.
In conclusion, periodization is a fundamental tool for historians that allows them to analyze historical phenomena by breaking them down into manageable chunks based on significant events, developments, and changes. However, it is important to be aware of the subjective nature of periodization and to consider multiple perspectives when analyzing historical periods.
Top 3 Authoritative Reference Publications or Domain Names:
1. History.com
2. National Geographic Society
3. The American Historical Association
28 During the Kennedy administration, which problem threatened America's economic stability? Increased American exports High trade tariffs on American exports Decreased value of the American dollar Diminishing gold supply Skip 27/40 complete
During the Kennedy administration, the problem that threatened America's economic stability was the diminishing gold supply. John F.
Kennedy was the 35th President of the United States and served from 1961 until his assassination in 1963. During his presidency, he took several initiatives to address economic problems faced by the nation. Among these problems, one was the diminishing gold supply.A decreasing supply of gold was one of the major economic problems faced by the United States during the 1960s. It led to a decline in the value of the dollar and, in turn, made imports more expensive. In response to this problem, Kennedy introduced a number of measures to stabilize the economy.
He started by imposing import restrictions and increasing the federal budget. He also increased the gold supply by encouraging the mining of gold in the United States. He also convinced foreign countries to use the dollar as a reserve currency, thereby boosting its value and making it more attractive to investors.In conclusion, the diminishing gold supply was one of the major economic problems faced by the United States during the Kennedy administration. Kennedy took several steps to address this problem, including import restrictions, increasing the federal budget, encouraging gold mining, and boosting the value of the dollar by making it a reserve currency.
Know more about federal budget here:
https://brainly.com/question/1303142
#SPJ8
Comment on why the Soviet Union provided support to the MPLA
In Angola in 1975
Explanation:
The Soviet Union provided support to the MPLA (Popular Movement for the Liberation of Angola) in Angola in 1975 for several reasons. Firstly, the MPLA was a Marxist-Leninist party, and thus shared ideological similarities with the Soviet Union, which was also a communist state. Supporting a fellow socialist movement aligned with the Soviet Union's interests in spreading communism globally.
Secondly, Angola was rich in natural resources, including oil and diamonds, and thus was a valuable target for foreign investment and influence. The Soviet Union saw supporting the MPLA as a way to gain access to these resources and establish a foothold in Africa, which was a region of strategic interest to both the Soviet Union and the United States during the Cold War.
Thirdly, the Soviet Union had a longstanding policy of supporting anti-colonial movements and national liberation struggles across the globe, and saw the MPLA's fight against Portuguese colonialism as part of this broader struggle. By supporting the MPLA, the Soviet Union was able to position itself as a champion of national liberation movements and anti-colonialism, which helped to strengthen its image globally.
Match each US Cold War strategy to the event in which it was used.
aid to Greece
CIA formed
Berlin Wall
domino theory
intelligence gathering
containment
1
brinksmanship →
Marshall Plan
Answer:
aid to Greece → Truman Doctrine
CIA formed → intelligence gathering
Berlin Wall → construction of the wall by the Soviet Union
domino theory → justification for US involvement in Vietnam War
intelligence gathering → CIA formed
containment → US strategy to prevent the spread of communism
brinksmanship → US strategy of pushing dangerous situations to the brink of war to force the other side to back down
What was the Second Continental Congress? What did it do?
Answer:
The Second Continental Congress assumed the normal functions of a government, appointing ambassadors, issuing paper currency, raising the Continental Army through conscription, and appointing generals to lead the army. The powers of the Congress were still very limited, however.
The purpose of the Second Continental Congress was for the colonists to meet and discuss their next steps in resolving their conflicts with the British Parliament. At the Second Continental Congress meeting, the colonists drafted the Olive Branch Petition in hopes of gaining King George III's support against the Parliament. Ultimately, the Second Continental Congress voted to declare independence from Great Britain.
The Second Continental Congress voted to adopt the Declaration of Independence on July 2, 1776, which led to the colonies becoming the United States of America. Under the Second Continental Congress, the newly formed country raised an army and developed a new government.
Explanation:
What was the Battle of Saratoga, and why was it significant?
Answer:
The Battle of Saratoga was a turning point in the Revolutionary War. The American defeat of the superior British army lifted patriot morale, furthered the hope for independence, and helped to secure the foreign support needed to win the war.
3. Compare the causes and outcomes of the American Revolution and the French Revolution. Identify two ways that that these revolutions were similar and two ways that they were different. Be sure to cite evidence from the course to support your response. (5 points)
The causes and outcomes of the American Revolution and the French Revolution:
Similar: Both revolutions were driven by the desire for independence and were influenced by Enlightenment ideas on liberty and equality.
Different: The American Revolution was a colonial uprising against British rule, while the French Revolution was a domestic revolution against monarchy and social inequality. The outcomes also differed, with the American Revolution resulting in the formation of the United States, while the French Revolution led to political turmoil and the rise of Napoleon.
The American Revolution and the French Revolution were both significant events in history that brought about major changes in their respective countries. While there are similarities between the two revolutions, there are also key differences.One similarity between the two revolutions is the shared goal of achieving independence and overthrowing oppressive regimes. In the American Revolution, colonists fought for their independence from British rule, seeking to establish a democratic system. Similarly, the French Revolution aimed to overthrow the monarchy and establish a more egalitarian society, where power resided with the people.Another similarity is the influence of Enlightenment ideas on both revolutions. The American Revolution was heavily influenced by Enlightenment thinkers such as John Locke, who advocated for natural rights and limited government. Similarly, the French Revolution was driven by Enlightenment principles of liberty, equality, and fraternity, as expressed in the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen.However, there are also notable differences between the two revolutions. Firstly, the American Revolution was primarily a colonial uprising against a distant imperial power, while the French Revolution was a domestic revolution against an entrenched monarchy and social hierarchy.Additionally, the outcomes of the revolutions differed significantly. The American Revolution resulted in the formation of a new nation, the United States of America, with a constitution and a representative government. In contrast, the French Revolution led to a period of political instability, the rise of radical factions, and eventually the rise of Napoleon Bonaparte as a dictator.In conclusion, while the American and French Revolutions shared common goals of independence and were influenced by Enlightenment ideals, they differed in terms of their contexts, outcomes, and long-term effects on their respective countries.For more such questions on American Revolution:
https://brainly.com/question/1799447
#SPJ8
what role do themes play in historians' efforts to organize information about the past?
Which excerpt from We’ve Got a Job expresses the author’s viewpoint about segregation in Birmingham?
“My parents were involved from the point that I could remember . . . My church was involved . . . You were there and just a part of it.”
“She would no longer just attend meetings. Somehow, she would act on her own.”
“‘Separate accommodations for the white and colored races’ were allowable, as long as the accommodations for each group were equal.”
“There were several things wrong—above all, the concept of ‘separate but equal’ itself. Separation on the basis of race is simply unjust.”
The ___ opened trade with the Middle East and helped end feudalism.
Carolingian Empire
Crusades
Battle of Hastings
University of Paris
Answer: B. crusades
Explanation: The crusades opened trade with the Middle East and helped end feudalism.
when did Ghana gain independence?
Answer: March 6 ,1957
Explanation:
Answer:
CT Ghana Gained it Independence in 1957
raphael warnock important facts
Answer:
1.) Warnock is the first African American to represent Georgia in the Senate
2.) belongs to the democratic party
3.) born in savanna Georgia
I hope I helped you!!!!
y Seattle Canine Club....
cussionGuide.docx
Arial
Home
11 BIUA. A.
Qusarvio a Lo-raniny
Questions
Does history repeat itself? In what
ways? In what ways have peoples
and civilizations changed or
evolved?
No
History does repeat itself, and this is evident from the occurrence of similar events and situations over the ages. This is a common phenomenon that has been observed over time in different countries and continents.
Historians and scholars have been able to identify different patterns in the way historical events unfold and repeat themselves. Peoples and civilizations have changed and evolved over time, primarily due to technological advancements, migration, and trade. Trade has led to the spread of cultures and ideas, leading to significant changes in different societies. The introduction of new ideas and technologies has resulted in increased agricultural production, better health, improved transport systems, and communication networks.
Furthermore, the exchange of ideas and knowledge has led to the development of new scientific theories and innovations that have changed the world. Examples of civilizations that have undergone significant changes over time include Ancient Greece, Rome, and China.
In conclusion, history does repeat itself, and this is evident from the occurrence of similar events and situations over the ages. Peoples and civilizations have changed and evolved due to trade, migration, and technological advancements. The exchange of knowledge and ideas has resulted in significant changes in different societies, leading to improved living conditions and a better quality of life.
Know more about civilizations here:
https://brainly.com/question/31536790
#SPJ8
did the United States progress in the roughly 250 years that it developed from European colonies to a re-unified nation at the end of the Civil War?
Who was Alexander Hamilton, and why was he significant?
Alexander Hamilton was a Founding Father of the United States and a key figure in the early years of the nation. He was born in the West Indies in 1755 or 1757 and later immigrated to the American colonies. Hamilton played a pivotal role in shaping the nation's political and economic systems and is known for his contributions as a statesman, lawyer, economist, and writer.
One of Hamilton's most significant achievements was his instrumental role in the establishment of a strong central government through his advocacy for the United States Constitution. He played a crucial part in the ratification of the Constitution by writing the majority of the Federalist Papers, a collection of essays that argued for the adoption of the Constitution and provided a detailed explanation of its principles and benefits.
As the first Secretary of the Treasury under President George Washington, Hamilton laid the foundation for the nation's financial system. He implemented policies such as the creation of a national bank, the assumption of state debts, and the establishment of a sound credit system. These measures helped stabilize the economy, promoted commerce and industry, and strengthened the federal government's authority.
Hamilton's economic vision was rooted in his belief in a strong, centralized government and a robust financial system that would support industrial development and national growth. He emphasized the importance of manufacturing and economic diversification, seeking to establish the United States as a self-sufficient and prosperous nation.
Beyond his economic contributions, Hamilton was a staunch advocate for a strong national defense, played a key role in establishing the U.S. Coast Guard, and contributed to the development of the American legal system. He also founded the New York Post newspaper and was involved in the establishment of the first financial markets in the United States.
Hamilton's legacy continues to resonate in American political and economic life. His ideas and policies laid the groundwork for a strong federal government, financial stability, and economic growth. His writings and contributions to the formation of the United States have made him one of the most influential figures in American history.
for more questions on United States
https://brainly.com/question/25899399
#SPJ8
What are the top ten famous customs in China?
They are Shanhai Pass, Tongguan, Jiayu Pass, Juyong Pass, Friendship Pass, Yanmen Pass, Zijing Pass, Jianmen Pass, Niangzi Pass and Wusheng Pass.
Which statements correctly describe the Arizona Supreme Court? Check all that apply.
The justices are elected by the voting public.
The justices are appointed by the governor.
The Arizona Supreme Court is made up of five justices.
The Arizona Supreme Court interprets Arizona’s laws.
The justices serve for life or until they retire.
The Arizona Supreme Court is the highest law in the state.
The justices serve for a limited term of six years.
Answer:
Explanation:
m m
What is the purpose of this kind of map?
to explain what natural resources were available
to show where humans moved and settled
to show why humans had to move around the world
to explain that global migration was very dangerous
The purpose of this kind of map is to show where humans moved and settled. So, the correct option is ''to show where humans moved and settled''.
It provides information about the patterns and routes of human migration throughout history, highlighting areas of settlement and population movement. The map helps us understand how and why humans migrated, including factors such as climate, resources, trade routes, and cultural interactions.
By studying the map, we can gain insights into the historical movements of different civilizations, the spread of the cultural practices, the formation of societies, and the establishment of trade networks.It allows us to analyze the impact of migration on the development of civilizations, the exchange of ideas, the diffusion of technologies, and the shaping of human history.The map may also provide context for understanding the distribution of ethnic groups, the origins of communities, and the connections between different regions.Overall, this type of map serves as a valuable tool for studying the human migration patterns and their historical significance, offering a visual representation of how populations have moved, settled, and influenced the development of societies and cultures over time. Hence, ''to show where humans moved and settled''.
For more questions on Map
https://brainly.com/question/23110894
#SPJ8
3. Write a brief paragraph describing the New Imperialism. Be sure to describe what it was, when it occurred, and what motivated it.
How is organizing history by theme different from organizing by region?
Answer: Organizing history by theme groups events and ideas together based on their similarities, while organizing by region groups them based on their geographic location.
Explanation: For example, a theme-based approach might group together events related to the civil rights movement, while a region-based approach might group together events related to the American South. Therefore, organizing history is based on similarities and organizing region is based on their geographic location.
How does the phrase "rampant urbanization and overuse of the land also resulted in the
decline and eventual abandonment of the cities of the Fertile Crescent" contribute
to the development of ideas ?
The phrase "rampant urbanization and overuse of the land also resulted in the decline and eventual abandonment of the cities of the Fertile Crescent" contributes to the development of ideas by highlighting the negative consequences of unchecked urbanization and unsustainable land use practices.
This statement implies that the cities of the Fertile Crescent, which were once thriving and prosperous, experienced a decline and abandonment due to the detrimental effects of rampant urbanization and overuse of the land. It suggests that the unsustainable practices employed in these cities, such as excessive resource extraction, deforestation, and the degradation of agricultural land, led to ecological degradation and social disruption.
By presenting these negative outcomes, the phrase invites us to reflect on the broader implications of urbanization and land use practices in our own societies. It encourages us to consider the importance of sustainable development, responsible resource management, and the need to strike a balance between urban growth and environmental preservation.
Furthermore, this statement also prompts us to explore the historical context and lessons learned from the decline of the cities in the Fertile Crescent. It encourages us to delve into the factors that contributed to their abandonment and to study how societies have responded and adapted to similar challenges throughout history.
In summary, the phrase contributes to the development of ideas by drawing attention to the consequences of rampant urbanization and unsustainable land use practices, stimulating critical thinking about the importance of sustainable development, and encouraging an examination of historical lessons and potential solutions for addressing these issues in contemporary contexts.
for similar questions on urbanization.
https://brainly.com/question/17126452
#SPJ8
Use the opinion of Mercantilist, Physiocrats and Socialist on the importance of government intervention in the economy
Mercantilists advocate for government intervention to promote national wealth, Physiocrats emphasize minimal government interference, and Socialists support extensive government intervention for economic equality.
Mercantilists believe that government intervention is crucial for promoting economic prosperity.
They advocate for policies such as protectionism, export promotion, and accumulation of wealth through trade surpluses. Mercantilists argue that the government should regulate and control economic activities to maximize national wealth and power.Physiocrats, on the other hand, advocate for minimal government intervention in the economy.
They believe in the concept of laissez-faire, emphasizing the importance of natural economic laws and the free operation of markets. Physiocrats argue that the government's role should be limited to protecting property rights and ensuring a stable legal framework, allowing for the efficient functioning of agricultural activities.Socialists, however, view government intervention as essential for achieving economic equality and social justice.
They believe that the government should play a central role in planning and directing the economy, redistributing wealth, and providing public goods and services. Socialists argue that government intervention is necessary to address inequality, ensure workers' rights, and promote collective welfare.In summary, while mercantilists emphasize government intervention for national wealth, physiocrats advocate for minimal government interference, and socialists believe in extensive government intervention to achieve economic equality and social welfare.
For more questions on government intervention
https://brainly.com/question/32990533
#SPJ8
What was the result ahmed gragns war
Ahmed Gragn's war was a conflict that occurred in the 16th century between Adal Sultanate and Abyssinia. The result of the war was that Adal Sultanate was defeated by Abyssinia and Ahmed Gragn was killed.
Ahmed Gragn, also known as Ahmed Gran, was an influential Muslim leader who led the Adal Sultanate against Abyssinia in the 16th century. His invasion of Abyssinia resulted in a significant conflict that lasted for around 14 years, beginning in 1529 AD.
The conflict began when Ahmed Gragn launched an attack on the Christian kingdom of Abyssinia, which was ruled by Lebna Dengel at the time. In 1531, he was able to capture the city of Harar, which gave him a strategic position to launch further attacks on Abyssinia. However, despite his early successes, Ahmed Gragn's campaign ultimately failed, and he was killed in 1543.
The war between Adal Sultanate and Abyssinia was a significant event in the history of Ethiopia. The conflict weakened Adal Sultanate and strengthened Abyssinia. After Ahmed Gragn's death, Abyssinia continued to expand its territory, and its rulers maintained control of the region for several centuries.
learn more about Ahmed Gragn's war
https://brainly.com/question/15233756
please help school ends tm and I need to do this project!
The purpose of this document is to officially register Thomas Edison's invention of the incandescent light bulb.
How to explain the informationThis document was written by Thomas Edison and his team of engineers.
This document was received by the United States Patent and Trademark Office.
This document was written on November 4, 1879. This document was a patent application.
I learned from this document that Thomas Edison went through a long and iterative process to develop the incandescent light bulb. He tried out many different materials and methods before he found a combination that worked.
When Edison filed his patent application for the incandescent light bulb, the world was still largely lit by gas lamps. Electric light bulbs had been invented before, but they were not very practical. They were either too expensive, too dim, or too short-lived. Edison's invention changed all that. His incandescent light bulb was affordable, bright, and long-lasting. It quickly became the standard for electric lighting.
Edison's patent application for the incandescent light bulb was a major breakthrough in the development of electric lighting.
Learn more about Edison on
https://brainly.com/question/28888370
#SPJ1
T/F? Most countries agreed with the United States and its actions concerning Vietnam.
Most countries agreed with the United States and its actions concerning Vietnam: False.
What is the Vietnam War?The Vietnam War is sometimes referred to as the Vietnam conflict or the Second Indochina War and it is a short, costly, protracted and divisive conflict between the communist government of North Vietnam and South Vietnam, which ended on the 30th of April, 1975.
Generally speaking, the United states of America provided a significant level of support to anti-communists during the conflicts that occurred in Turkey, Greece, Korea, and Vietnam (Vietnam War).
In conclusion, we can reasonably infer and logically deduce that the actions of the United states of America with respect to Vietnam were not endorsed by most countries.
Read more on Vietnam War here: brainly.com/question/12918391
#SPJ1
False, not most countries agreed with the United States and its actions concerning Vietnam. It was a divisive issue and while some countries supported it, many other countries opposed the American involvement.
Explanation:False, it is not correct to say that most countries agreed with the United States and its actions concerning Vietnam. During the Vietnam War, it was a divisive issue internationally. Some allied countries supported the U.S.'s intervention due to the principles of containment and the domino theory. However, many others, especially those in the 'Non-aligned Movement,' opposed the American involvement. They viewed it as an act of imperialism, and a violation of Vietnam's right to self-determination.
Learn more about Vietnam War here:https://brainly.com/question/11375126
#SPJ1
Based on the frontispiece of Prince Henry, which of the following statements best describes Zurara’s intent in producing the volume?
Answer:
To Record deeds that would bring honor to prince henry
Explanation:
The frontispiece of Prince Henry suggests that Zurara's intent in producing the volume was to glorify and celebrate the achievements of Prince Henry and his explorations. So, the correct choice is option A.
The frontispiece serves as a visual representation of Prince Henry's grandeur and importance. It portrays him in a prominent position, surrounded by symbols of power and authority, such as ships, maps, and celestial spheres.
This imagery aims to elevate Prince Henry's status and highlight his significant role in the Age of Discovery. By presenting him in such a noble and heroic manner, Zurara intended to inspire admiration and reverence for Prince Henry's accomplishments.
Additionally, the elaborate depiction of Prince Henry and the exploration motifs in the frontispiece convey a sense of adventure and discovery. It implies that Prince Henry's pursuits were not only remarkable but also deserving of emulation.
Thus, Zurara likely aimed to inspire future generations to follow in Prince Henry's footsteps, encouraging them to continue his legacy of exploration and discovery. Hence, the correct choice is option A.
For more questions on Prince Henry
https://brainly.com/question/32047779
#SPJ8
Complete Question:
Based on the frontispiece of Prince Henry, which of the following statements best describes Zurara's intent in producing the volume?
a. To glorify and celebrate the achievements of Prince Henry and his explorations.b. To provide an accurate historical account of Prince Henry's life and accomplishments.c. To inspire future generations to continue Prince Henry's legacy of exploration and discovery.d. To establish Prince Henry as a revered figure and promote his status as a national hero.At the national level, what is a disadvantage of being in the party that opposes the President’s party? a lack of independence a clear chain of command competition among leadership strictly enforced organization
Answer:
Explanation:
At the national level, being in the party that opposes the President's party comes with a disadvantage of a lack of independence. Members of the opposition party are expected to be critical of the President's policies and actions, but they are also expected to vote against them in Congress. This can lead to a perception that they are simply obstructing the President's agenda rather than offering their own ideas and solutions. Additionally, members of the opposition party may have less access to information and resources than members of the President's party, which can further limit their effectiveness.
Furthermore, being in the opposition party can lead to competition among leadership. Without a clear chain of command or control over policy decisions, members of the opposition party may struggle to present a united front or establish a clear message. This can lead to infighting and disagreements among leadership, which can weaken the party's overall position.
Finally, being in the opposition party can mean operating without strictly enforced organization. Unlike members of the President's party, who may have access to well-funded and organized political machines, members of the opposition party may have to rely on grassroots support or individual efforts to get their message out. This can make it more difficult for them to compete in elections or gain traction with voters.
In conclusion, being in the party that opposes the President's party at the national level comes with several disadvantages, including a lack of independence, competition among leadership, and a lack of strictly enforced organization.
Top 3 Authoritative Reference Publications or Domain Names Used in Answering this Question:
1. The New York Times
2. Politico
3. The Washington Post
Construct a conversation between a poor, landless farmer and a middle class American in which each evaluates the economic challenges and benefits they face.
In doing so, be sure to define and explain what Americans understood to be meant by “the middle class”. Why was it almost impossible for landless farmers to achieve middle class status?
Please use the documents here are the pictures
In this conversation, a poor, landless farmer and a middle-class American discuss their respective economic challenges and benefits.
Here are the steps to be followed:
Step 1: Introduction to the economic challenges and benefits faced by a poor, landless farmer and a middle-class American.
In this conversation, we will explore the economic challenges and benefits experienced by a poor, landless farmer and a middle-class American. The middle class is generally understood in America to refer to a socio-economic group that falls between the upper class and the lower class. They typically have a moderate income, own property, and enjoy a certain level of financial stability.
Step 2: Evaluating the economic challenges faced by the poor, landless farmer.
The poor, landless farmer faces numerous economic challenges. Firstly, without land ownership, they lack a stable source of income and are often dependent on working as laborers for landowners. This leads to low wages and precarious employment. Additionally, they struggle with limited access to credit and financial resources, making it difficult for them to invest in farming equipment or expand their operations. The lack of education and skills training further exacerbates their economic hardships, limiting their opportunities for upward mobility.
Step 3: Evaluating the economic benefits experienced by middle-class Americans.
The middle-class American enjoys certain economic benefits. They have a stable source of income, typically from salaried employment or successful business ventures. This allows them to meet their basic needs comfortably and have some disposable income for discretionary spending. They often have access to credit and financial services, enabling them to invest in assets like homes, vehicles, and retirement savings. Moreover, the middle class generally has better access to education and skills training, which opens up opportunities for career advancement and higher-paying jobs.
Step 4: Explaining the challenges faced by landless farmers in achieving middle-class status.
It is almost impossible for landless farmers to achieve middle-class status due to various reasons. Firstly, the lack of land ownership restricts their ability to build wealth through property appreciation or farming profits. The land is a valuable asset that serves as collateral for loans and provides long-term stability. Without it, landless farmers have little to leverage for financial security.
Additionally, the cycle of poverty and limited access to resources make it challenging for them to break free from their circumstances. The absence of education and skills training further hinders their ability to acquire higher-paying jobs or start their own businesses. The lack of social and economic mobility for landless farmers creates a significant barrier to achieving middle-class status in American society.
Know more about the middle-class American here:
https://brainly.com/question/4122496
#SPJ8
Hawaii became part of the United States when
Answer:
Hawaii became part of the United States when it was formally annexed on August 12, 1898.
Imagine someone is asking this question to you
Would you be in favor of immigration caps on people entering the state of Tx? Why or why not?
(This is government)
Answer:
No I would not be in favor of immigration cap on people entering the state of Texas.
Explanation:
Well because visa caps limit are only 675,000 visas a year the government can provide, but Texas depends on immigrants to grow their economy, why, because Immigrants in Texas' workforce contribute an estimated $119 billion to the Texas economy annually in personal income, making up nearly 1 in 5 of all wage dollars in the state.
Yes I would be in Favor of the topic of immigration caps on people entering the state of Texas.
The Immigration policyImmigration policy is a complex and multifaceted issue, with various factors and considerations involved. Advocates of immigration caps may argue that imposing restrictions on the number of people entering Texas can help manage population growth, alleviate strain on public services, and protect job opportunities for current residents.
They might believe that a controlled and regulated immigration system ensures the assimilation and integration of newcomers into society.
On the other hand, opponents of immigration caps might argue that such restrictions can hinder economic growth and cultural diversity.
Read more on Immigration policy here https://brainly.com/question/20488583
#SPJ1
