The effect should the plot have on a character, to help communicate the story’s theme is, that the plot should almost break the character’s spirit.
What is the plot of the story?The plot of the story is a series of events that happen in a story. The plot is the first thing that is created in the story, and then the characters. The plot gives shape to the story. The plot also defines the characters of the story.
Thus, the correct option is C.
Learn more about the plot of the story
https://brainly.com/question/17146449
#SPJ2
Read this sentence.
Once upon a time there lived a king and a queen.
Which best identifies the psychic distance in this sentence?
A. The psychic distance is large because the reader sees the
characters from the outside.
B. The psychic distance is small because the relationship between
the king and queen is well established.
C. The psychic distance is large because the characters are people
with a great deal of power.
D. The psychic distance is small because the first phrase of the
sentence is familiar to most readers.
Answer:the physic distance is small because the reader sees the characters from the outside
Explanation: pex
Jungle Mischief
by L. Kenyi
Alexander pursued his older brothers through the thick vegetation of the jungle forest. "Hey wait! Where are you guys going?" Alexander hollered after Jonathan and Abraham who did not slow down or answer him. The older boys were faster and stronger than little Alexander, but he had more heart. He kept his sharp eyes focused on the moving plants in front of him, indications that his brothers had just rushed past. Alexander kept running until he discovered them below a tall acacia tree. They had lugged ropes, boards, nails, a hammer, and a large basket out to the tree.
"Hey, Alexander will fit in that basket," Abraham commented to Jonathan.
"No. It's not a good idea. Mom would have our hides if we did that," Jonathan replied.
"What are you guys talking about?" Alexander pestered them.
"Do you want to do something fun?" Abraham inquired mischievously.
"What?" Alexander was eager to participate in his older brothers' fun.
"We can lift you high in that tree if you sit in that basket. It will be great. Then, we'll send stuff up and you can start building a fort," Abraham explained.
"It looks sort of dangerous. I don't think I want to do it," Alexander said apprehensively.
"Are you chicken? I knew you wouldn't do it. You're not brave enough," Abraham jabbed at him.
"Just leave him alone. He said he doesn't want to," Jonathan defended Alexander.
"Well, I might," Alexander offered, working up his courage.
"I'll let you ride my dirt bike if you do it," Abraham bribed.
"Okay, but don't lift me too high up," Alexander agreed.
"Get in," Abraham ordered without acknowledging Alexander's condition.
"I don't know about this," Jonathan hesitated.
Abraham reassured him, "It will be fine."
Alexander sat in the large basket. One end of the rope was knotted around the handle of the basket and the other end was hanging over a very high tree branch. Alexander's brothers pulled the free end of the rope and easily lifted him and the basket.
"That's enough! Stop lifting me!" Alexander yelled down to them.
"Okay, we'll stop lifting you," Abraham smirked. The older boys stopped lifting the basket and tied the loose end of the rope around the trunk of the tree, leaving Alexander high above the ground.
"I want down! Get me down now!" Alexander screamed.
"Stay right there, we're just going to get a few more tools. We'll be right back," Abraham said amused at his prank. The older boys started walking away.
"Wait, guys! At least let me get to a branch. Then, send up some boards and the hammer and nails so I can start working on the fort," Alexander used his cunning.
"Okay, you might as well make yourself useful up there," Abraham remarked.
Jonathan lowered the basket to the nearest branch and held the rope steady while Alexander climbed out. Abraham lifted the supplies to Alexander and tied the rope again.
As soon as the two older brothers were gone, Alexander got busy nailing boards onto the tree. He had some difficulty, but he managed to stand on a branch and nail a board securely to the tree trunk. Then he moved down and nailed another board below it. Carefully, he worked his way down to the ground. Alexander was proud of the way he got himself down from the tree. He walked cheerfully back to his house imagining the surprised look on his brothers' faces when they found he was not in the tree and saw the ladder he had built.
How does the author develop the points of view of Alexander and his older brother, Abraham?
A.
The author writes from Alexander's perspective and uses dialogue to develop Alexander's admiration of Abraham and Abraham's frustration with Alexander.
B.
The author writes from Alexander's perspective and develops Alexander's admiration toward his brothers through narration, but he uses dialogue to develop Abraham's annoying point of view toward Alexander.
C.
The author writes from Alexander's perspective and develops his clever point of view by narration and dialogue, whereas Abraham's mischievous point of view is developed only by his dialogue.
D.
The author writes from Alexander's perspective and uses dialogue to show that Alexander is bothersome and Abraham wants to get Alexander to leave him alone.
Answer:
C. The author writes from Alexander's perspective and develops his clever point of view by narration and dialogue, whereas Abraham's mischievous point of view is developed only by his dialogue.
Explanation:
Here, we have three brothers - Alexander, Jonathan, and Abraham. Alexander is the youngest, but very clever. Jonathan and Abraham are pranking him, but Abraham seems to be more mischievous than Jonathan, who feels sorry for Alexander.
Alexander's cleverness is shown by both narration and dialogue, for example:
Narration: He kept his sharp eyes focused on the moving plants in front of him, indications that his brothers had just rushed past. Dialogue: "Wait, guys! At least let me get to a branch. Then, send up some boards and the hammer and nails so I can start working on the fort," Alexander used his cunning.Abraham isn't annoyed with Alexander - he is simply pranking him. His mischief is shown through dialogue, e.g.:
"Are you chicken? I knew you wouldn't do it. You're not brave enough," Abraham jabbed at him.What can others learn from the death of Chadwick Boseman at such a young age
In a summary. How did congress and its congressional membership was formed during the constitutional convention in 1787 by such proposed plans and key players.
Answer: The Constitutional Convention took place from May 14 to September 17, 1787, in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The point of the event was decide how America was going to be governed. Although the Convention had been officially called to revise the existing Articles of Confederation, many delegates had much bigger plans.
Explanation:
What is the importance of this symbol within the story?
What does scientists think about deforastion?
Answer:
Scientists DON'T Like Deforestation
Explanation:
Many biologists tend to dislike deforestation due to the fact that it destroys wildlife and their homes. Some scientists even major in the fight against deforestation as a way to preserve the earth and their studies.
Who is the main character in the story 'A letter to God'
Main character in the story 'A letter to God' was Lencho. He was the simple and hard working farmer .
lencho I guess...........................
Is there anything wrong with this sentance
''When the mother called,'' said the dad, ''she sounded angry.''
Answer:
h
Explanation:
Which of the following words mean complaining or whining often?
O Homage
Conquering
Upbraid
O Querulous
Answer:
Querulous
Explanation:
quer·u·lous
/ˈkwer(y)ələs/
Learn to pronounce
adjective
complaining in a petulant or whining manner.
"she became querulous and demanding"
That the pretended power of suspending the laws by regal authority without consent of Parliament is illegal...
This quote from the English Bill of Rights may have influenced the colonists to believe that
O no person may pretend to have power by suspending laws without proper consent
O the king would be able to pass laws that may extend to America
O the executive would need permission from the legislature in order to pass laws
O each person is given certain rights that even regal authority cannot take away
Answer:
The answer is A
Explanation:
on edg
Plz answer me will mark as brainliest
pls help with the attached photo fast
Answer:
1-c
2-a
3-o
4-e
5-b
6-d
7-l
8-j
9-m
10-f
11-h
12-n
13-g
14-k
15-i
Explanation:
I'm not 100% sure, just to be clear, but these are the answers I got. You may want to double check them, just in-case though. Thanks!
Write an analytical essay on world war 2 propaganda poster
Answer:
where is the poster?
Explanation:
ed
th
e
n
How does the metaphor "He blew His breath into its
stuffing" contribute to the meaning of the excerpt?
It indicates that God had help creating Earth.
It emphasizes how the narrator is willing to give his
life for God.
OIt illustrates that the narrator has belief in God's
power.
O It demonstrates how God interacts with human
beings.
Answer: The metaphor "He blew His breath into its stuffing" contributes to the meaning of the excerpt by illustrating that God interacts with human beings. In this metaphor, the act of blowing breath into something implies an intimate and personal involvement. It suggests that God is actively engaged in the creation process and has a direct connection with the created entity, in this case, Earth. The metaphor emphasizes the notion that God's power and presence are intimately intertwined with human existence
Explanation:
A speech should be clear, coherent and should maintain a consistent _______ .
The language you use will vary depending on your _______ .
A speech should be clear, coherent and should maintain a consistent pace.
The language one uses will vary depending on the audience.
What is speech?
While doing any kind of communication and vocal form, there is a use of speech that is done in the form of language. It's not compulsory that only one language be used, which is English or any other language.
Most of the time, speech is delivered when there is a need for formal talk and it is required that a person wants to give information or wants to address a particular population.
At the same time, there are basically four types of speech that can be seen in day-to-day life and which have been used by various people depending upon the requirement and event that has been stated or is about to be stated. These types are: manuscript, memorized, extemporaneous, and impromptu.
Learn more about speech from here:
https://brainly.com/question/17020206
#SPJ2
WILL GIVE BRAINLISEST
Select the correct answer.
Which of these situations describes a reaffirmation?
A. A student assures his teacher several times that he'll turn in the homework. B. A group of friends starts a club together at school.
C. A group of friends sits together at the pep rally.
D. A student tells his teacher that he forgot his homework in his locker.
Answer:
D. A student assures his teacher several times that he'll turn in the homework
Explanation:
The term reaffirmation is used to describe when someone reconfirms or reassures someone, a group of people, etc. of a belief.
In this specific question, answers A, B, and C do not demonstrate someone reassuring or reconfirming anything. B may look like a possible answer, but it is incorrect since the student is only telling his teacher a belief one time. The prefix "re--" means "again," so the correct answer will demonstrate an affirmation performed at least twice.
In D, the student is assuring his teacher several times that he will turn in his homework, properly demonstrating reassurance or a reaffirmation.
A reaffirmation occurs when a student assures their teacher multiple times about turning in the homework. Therefore, option A is correct.
Reaffirmation refers to the act of confirming or restating something previously agreed upon or promised. In the context of the answer, reaffirmation signifies the student's repeated assurances to the teacher about completing and turning in the homework as previously discussed.
By reaffirming their commitment, the student emphasizes the importance of their initial agreement and seeks to strengthen trust and confidence in their follow-through.
Reaffirmation serves as a form of validation, ensuring that both parties are on the same page and reinforcing the student's intention to fulfill their responsibilities.
Learn more about validation here:
https://brainly.com/question/13262566
#SPJ4
The words and sentence construction of all living languages are constantly changing, so who gets to make the rules of American English?
Answer:
I think the British
Explanation:
The British colonization of the Americas is the history of the establishment of control, settlement, and decolonization of the continents of the Americas by England, Scotland and (after 1707) Great Britain. Colonization efforts began in the 16th century with failed attempts by England to establish permanent colonies in North America. The first permanent British colony was established in Jamestown, Virginia in 1607. Over the next several centuries more colonies were established in North America, Central America, South America, and the Caribbean. Though most British colonies in the Americas eventually gained independence, some colonies have opted to remain under Britain's jurisdiction as British Overseas Territories.
Various veterans had told him tales. Some talked of gray, bewhiskered hordes who were advancing with relentless curses and chewing tobacco with unspeakable valor; tremendous bodies of fierce soldiery who were sweeping along like the Huns. Others spoke of tattered and eternally hungry men who fired despondent powders....
Still, he could not put a whole faith in veterans' tales, for recruits were their prey. They talked much of smoke, fire, and blood, but he could not tell how much might be lies. They persistently yelled "Fresh fish!" at him, and were in no wise to be trusted.
However, he perceived now that it did not greatly matter what kind of soldiers he was going to fight, so long as they fought, which fact no one disputed. There was a more serious problem. He lay in his bunk pondering upon it. He tried to mathematically prove to himself that he would not run from a battle.
Previously he had never felt obliged to wrestle too seriously with this question. In his life he had taken certain things for granted, never challenging his belief in ultimate success, and bothering little about means and roads. But here he was confronted with a thing of moment. It had suddenly appeared to him that perhaps in a battle he might run. He was forced to admit that as far as war was concerned he knew nothing of himself.
. . . .
He sprang from the bunk and began to pace nervously to and fro. "Good Lord, what's th' matter with me?" he said aloud.
He felt that in this crisis his laws of life were useless. Whatever he had learned of himself was here of no avail. He was an unknown quantity. He saw that he would again be obliged to experiment as he had in early youth. He must accumulate information of himself, and meanwhile he resolved to remain close upon his guard lest those qualities of which he knew nothing should everlastingly disgrace him.
(from ,begin underline,The Red Badge of Courage,end underline, by Stephen Crane)
Question
Which describes how the young soldier's behavior reveals a moral dilemma?
Answer options with 4 options
1.
His agitation about how he will perform reveals his fear that he is secretly a coward.
2.
His feeling that the laws of life are useless makes him fear that he is becoming an outlaw.
3.
His lack of trust in the older soldiers reveals that he fears he is losing his faith in humanity.
4.
His feeling that it doesn't matter who he is going to fight reveals that he is losing his compassion.
1. His agitation about how he will perform reveals his fear that he is secretly a coward.
1. The young soldier's behavior shows signs of agitation and nervousness, as indicated by his pacing nervously to and fro and exclaiming, "Good Lord, what's th' matter with me?"
2. He is deeply concerned about his own performance in battle, suggesting that he is grappling with doubts and insecurities.
3. The passage states that he tries to mathematically prove to himself that he will not run from a battle, indicating his fear of being cowardly or lacking bravery.
4. The soldier's contemplation about running from a battle suggests a moral dilemma he is facing. He is forced to confront the possibility that he might not live up to his own expectations of courage and bravery.
5. His fear of being seen as a coward is a moral concern because it goes against the societal expectation and valor associated with soldiers in battle.
6. The passage highlights that the soldier's previous confidence and belief in ultimate success are no longer applicable, emphasizing his internal struggle and moral dilemma.
7. Overall, the young soldier's behavior and thoughts reveal his deep fear of being secretly a coward, which indicates a moral dilemma he is grappling with.
For more such questions on agitation, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/30347633
#SPJ8
Which THREE sentences have ambiguous or incorrect use of adverbs?
•Our food is running out now we have to go to the store.
•Always, the winners are Kurt and Gerald.
•Our friends amazingly didn't get in trouble for being late.
•We ended the game quickly running home.
•We played the video game continuously eating snacks.
Answer:
Ambiguous Adverb: "a situation where a sentence may be interpreted in more than one way," quoted from wiki.
B. Always, the winners are Kurt and Gerald.
The word "always" is awkwardly placed.
D. We ended the game quickly running home.
Did they end the game quickly, or did they run home quickly?
E. We played the video game continuously eating snacks.
Were they playing the video game continuously, or were they eating snacks continuously?
B, D, and E.
Read the excerpt below from an article about Chang and Eng, conjoined twins:
As they grew, Chang and Eng learned to how to live joined together. As young children, they could run, jump, and swim. By age fourteen, they were selling duck eggs to help support their widowed mother. The two boys developed very different personalities, but they still got along well enough. Chang was more outspoken and got angry easily. Eng was quiet and more interested in watching the world around him. Although the two would sometimes fight and even go for weeks without speaking, in general they acted together and shared habits and opinions.
Which sentence provides the strongest textual evidence that the boys were somewhat typical siblings despite being conjoined?
As they grew, Chang and Eng learned to how to live joined together.
… the two would sometimes fight and even go for weeks without speaking
As young children, they could run, jump, and swim.
Chang was more outspoken and got angry easily.
The sentence that provides the strongest textual evidence that the boys were somewhat typical siblings despite being conjoined is- B. the two would sometimes fight and even go for weeks without speaking.
This sentence describes the nature of two siblings and this is universal in nature, that is, it is something that most of the siblings would do. This nature is not restricted to twins but rather every sibling. Fighting and not speaking is not limited to only twins. Hence, the two boys Chang and Eng were typical siblings who fought and went for weeks without speaking to each other. This nature is present in every sibling, not just twins.Learn more about twins from here-
https://brainly.com/question/14582642
#SPJ10
Is “in the night sky” adverbial or adjectival?
Answer:
Adverbial
Explanation:
Adjectival and adverbial phrases are types of prepositional phrases, which contain a preposition followed by an object, or noun, and any modifiers. An adjectival phrase is one that describes or modifies a noun, and an adverbial phrase is one that modifies a verb
What is the Rising Action of “The Lottery Ticket” by Anton Chekhov?
Answer: Also the mentioning of their lottery ticket. Rising Action/Complications: Ivan finds one of his numbers match, which causes his true wits to leave him. This is where the conflict really begins. Then, Ivan's wife, Masha, mentions her partaking in the wealth.
Explanation:
Which method of note-taking is the most common and useful in every subject?
outlining
mapping
charting
Cornell
Answer:
a
Explanation:
Answer:
Which method of note-taking is the most common and useful in every subject?
✔outlining
mapping
charting
Cornell
Explanation:
Which of these factors was the MOST significant
in bringing about the surrender of Monterey?
The four columns of troops were a great distance
apart as they approached Monterey.
The Mexican garrison could not effectively fire upon
Twiggs's well-protected troops.
General Worth found an inventive means of
approaching the plaza and citadel with his troops.
The commanders of the troops were humane to the
Mexicans and protected their property.
Answer:
General Worth found an inventive means of approaching the plaza and citadel with his troops
Explanation:
yes
Answer:
General Worth found an inventive means of approaching the plaza and citadel with his troops
Explanation:
Add examples of ethos, pathos and logos to their respective columns
Ethos, Pathos, and Logos are the three pillars of persuasive communication. Ethos is an appeal to credibility or trustworthiness, pathos is an appeal to emotion, and logos is an appeal to logic or reason. Here are some examples of each:
Ethos Examples:
1. "As a doctor with over 20 years of experience, I can assure you that this treatment is safe and effective."
2. "Our company has been in business for 50 years, and we have a proven track record of success."
Pathos Examples:
1. "Imagine the joy on your child's face when they open their present on Christmas morning."
2. "Don't let your loved ones suffer in silence. Donate to our charity and make a difference today."
Logos Examples:
1. "Studies show that regular exercise can improve heart health and reduce the risk of chronic diseases."
2. "According to industry experts, this product is the most reliable and efficient on the market."
In summary, by using ethos, pathos, and logos effectively in persuasive communication, you can appeal to your audience's credibility, emotions, and logic, respectively. These examples illustrate how these three appeals can be used to create effective and compelling messages.
For more such questions on credibility
https://brainly.com/question/24266723
#SPJ8
Elijah read the word luxurious in a story. He did not know the meaning of the word. He did notice that it reminded him of the word luxury.
What strategy did Elijah use to discover the meaning of luxury?
replacing the unknown word
looking at how the word is used
thinking of similar words
looking for a smaller word
Answer:
Hello! I got thinking of similar words!
Explanation:
Hope this helped! :)-Jade
Me/asked/if/knew/I/they/him
Answer:
what is this raaaaaaaaaaaaa
Which of the following is a debatable claim?
A. Over 44% of households have a dog.
B. Dogs make better pets than cats.
C.More people have dogs than cats.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
People have different preferences for which makes a better pet, and the other options are statistics, so you would only be able to debate over B
Lady Bracknell. [With a shiver, crossing to the sofa and sitting down.] I do not know whether there is anything peculiarly exciting in the air of this particular part of Hertfordshire, but the number of engagements that go on seems to me considerably above the proper average that statistics have laid down for our guidance. I think some preliminary inquiry on my part would not be out of place.
–The Importance of Being Earnest,
Oscar Wilde
What does this passage most clearly convey about Lady Bracknell?
She believes strongly in the importance of rules.
She is thrilled that her family members are engaged.
She hopes to help with the wedding planning.
She believes in the importance of where one lives.
The passage reveals that Lady Bracknell believes strongly in the importance of rules. (option A)
What does the passage reveal?In the passage from "The Importance of Being Earnest," we learn that Lady Bracknell is concerned about the high number of engagements taking place at a certain part of Hertfordshire.
Her preoccupation and will to find out more about the subject reveal that Lady Bracknell believes in the importance of rules. According to her, there is a proper average "that statistics have laid down for our guidance." If something goes against the rules, that means it is wrong.
With the information above in mind, we can choose option A as the correct answer.
Learn more about Lady Bracknell here:
https://brainly.com/question/25581538
Answer:
a
Explanation:
-
One central idea of the article is that many Samhain traditions live on in present-day celebrations.
Which two details BEST support the central idea above?
There, the Druids, who served as Celtic priests, would start a ritual bonfire. The light called on people across Ireland to gather and build bonfires of their own.
People were said to disguise themselves as spirits to fool real ones, which apparently sometimes involved dressing up in animal skins and, in Scotland, wearing white and veiling or blackening one's face.
A modern version of the holiday is still celebrated with bonfires throughout Ireland. The holiday of Samhain is also practiced by modern Wiccans.
Though modern Halloween deals with graveyards and the walking dead, a focus on one's own dearly departed is absent from the day.
A
1 and 2
B
2 and 3
C
3 and 4
D
1 and 4
Answer:
C. 3 and 4
Explanation:
According to the central idea which states that many Samhain traditions live on in present-day celebrations, the two details that best support it is option C.
This is because the third and fourth options clearly state that the holiday of Samhain is practiced by modern Wiccans and modern versions of the holiday is celebrated in Ireland.
