Answer: It was the last land engagement in the American Civil War.
Explanation: The Battle of Palmito Ranch in Texas is significant because it was the last land engagement in the American Civil War. Both Union and Confederate commanders were aware that Confederate General Robert E. Lee had surrendered, so it is not known why Union forces continued to attack after the war had ended.
The Republican Party opposed which issue?
The Republican Party opposed the main issues are:
An expansion of slavery.Transgender rights.What is Republican Party?The term "Republican Party" refers to the political party of the United States. The Republican Party is also known as GOP. It was the established that March 20, 1854. The main headquarters Washington, D.C.
The Republican Party opposed the main issues are:
Women abortion.Same-sex marriage.Transgender rights.Comprehensive sex educationAn expansion of slavery.As a result, the significance of the Republican Party are the aforementioned.
Learn more about on Republican Party, here:
https://brainly.com/question/1204107
#SPJ1
what is the legacy of post-world war ii conservatism
Post-World War II conservatism is characterized by a strong belief in individual freedom, limited government, free market capitalism, and traditional moral values.
Its legacy includes the rise of the conservative movement in the United States, the implementation of conservative policies such as tax cuts and deregulation, and the shaping of a conservative political ideology that continues to influence the US and other countries today.
Some of its prominent leaders include William F. Buckley Jr, Barry Goldwater, and Ronald Reagan. The legacy of post-WWII conservatism also includes a resurgence of traditionalist and nationalist sentiments, as well as ongoing debates about the role of government and the balancing of individual rights with social responsibility.
To know more about World War II click on the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/15570403#
#SPJ11
the first major us industrial labor organization which collapsed during the depresseion of teh 1870s
The main significant US modern work association, which fell during the depression of 1870 is National Labor Union.
In American history, the National Labor Union (NLU), a political-activity development, looked to work on working circumstances through official change as opposed to through aggregate dealing from 1866 to 1873. The Public Worker's organization was the primary critical modern trade guild in the US; it fizzled during the 1870 gloom.
The National Labor Union was established in 1866 in Baltimore, Maryland, at a show intended to join ranchers, reformers, and gifted and untalented workers into an alliance that would come down on Congress to order regulation that would restrict the working day to eight hours. The Public Worker's organization might have had upwards of 500,000 individuals during its short life.
Learn more about depression:
https://brainly.com/question/29485536
#SPJ4
The following events are from US and Florida history. Place the events into their correct order. You may need to do some outside research to answer this question fully.
Tiles:
West Florida is conquered by Spain.
Spain gives Florida to Great Britain
after the French and Indian War.
Spain declares war on Great Britain
during the American Revolution.
East Florida and West Florida are created.
The American Revolution begins.
The American Revolution ends with
the signing of the Treaty of Paris.
The Chronological sequence of the events are as follows:-
Spain gives Florida to Great Britain after the French and Indian War - 1763The American Revolution begins - 1775Spain declares war on Great Britain during the American Revolution - 1779West Florida is conquered by Spain - 1781The American Revolution ends with the signing of the Treaty of Paris - 1783East Florida and West Florida are created - 1822What ended the American Revolution, Treaty of Paris?The Treaty of Paris ended the Revolutionary War between the United Kingdom and the United States, acknowledged American independence, and set the new nation's borders.
The majority of the fighting took place well north of Florida, however Florida was occasionally targeted. Spain invaded West Florida in 1779, taking advantage of Britain's concern with the colonies. Britain had lost West Florida to Spain by 1781. Spain reclaimed the remainder of Florida at the end of the American Revolution.
On June 21, 1779, Spain declared war on the United Kingdom, so entering the American Revolutionary War.
On March 30, 1822, the United States established the Florida Territory by merging East Florida and the residual West Florida east of the Perdido River and creating a government.
Learn more about American Revolution here:
https://brainly.com/question/27833385
#SPJ1
How did the liberties of black after 1877 give way to legal segregation across the south? course herp?
- The South had the thought that in order to prevent blacks from having successful lives, or from over-ruling whites, they had to remove everything that had happened in the Reconstruction era, and tell blacks their true place.
- blacks who were imprisoned for the tiniest of reasons were brought to companies to labor (basically a smaller form of slavery)
- although some Southern cities supported the growth of a business-induced black middle-class, business was segregated.
- even the north would not except black workers-> blacks getting more into business/church instead of politics in which they felt more success with
- southern legislatures made laws that appeared made for anyone, but really applied only to blacks. in order to do things like to vote, they gave literacy tests, or asked questions they knew blacks could not answer-> grandfather clause-> disenfranchisement
Option a The South had the thought that in order to prevent blacks from having successful lives, or from over-ruling whites, they had to remove everything that had happened in the Reconstruction era, and tell blacks their true place.
The South's Reconstruction era ended with the Compromise of 1877. After the Civil War, the federal government played a significant role in helping former slaves adjust to life as citizens of the United States during Reconstruction. However, the federal government stopped these efforts in the southern states as a result of the Compromise of 1877, allowing for legal segregation.
Southern states established distinct areas for white and black citizens after 1877. Restaurants, theaters, parks, and schools were all included in this. The Supreme Court's decision in Plessy v. Ferguson would further support this legal segregation.
learn about Reconstruction
https://brainly.com/question/10523363
#SPJ4
explain how rome changed from a kingdom to a republic and then to an empire.
The transformation from the Roman kingdom to a republic and later an empire was a result of various factors such as political instability, civil wars, and the rise of powerful individuals.
Introduction: The Roman kingdom was a monarchy ruled by a king in ancient Rome.
Detail: The Roman kingdom was established in 753 BC, but by 509 BC, the Roman people had grown unhappy with the rule of the Etruscan king and revolted, establishing the Roman Republic. The Republic was ruled by two consuls, elected by the people, who held executive power.
This change in government allowed for a more representative form of rule, where the voice of the people was heard.
However, despite the Republic’s successes, the state was plagued by civil wars and political instability. This led to the rise of Julius Caesar, a military general, who became the dominant figure in the Roman state.
After Caesar's death, his adopted son Octavian defeated the other leaders in a power struggle and declared himself emperor, marking the transition from the Republic to the Roman Empire.
Learn more about Roman kingdom here;
https://brainly.com/question/27953744#
#SPJ11
How does type of inequality (A) affect area of social life (B)?
Their study revealed that inequality contributes to a wide range of health and social issues, including lower life expectancy, higher infant mortality, worse social mobility, higher levels of violence, and mental illness.
Definition of inequality What impact does it have on society?Every member of society is impacted by inequality. The GDP per individual is impacted by economic inequality. It results in worsening public health and illiteracy, which elevates crime rates, feeds political unrest, and ultimately destabilizes society.
What effects does social injustice have on us?Your happiness and how others perceive you are both impacted by inequality. In cultures with lower levels of equality, people are less likely to express happiness, trust one another, or participate in civic or social activities.
To know more about social inequality visit:
https://brainly.com/question/17196775
#SPJ1
How were some unsuccessful rebellions still significant for indigenous people
Unsuccessful rebellions can still be significant for indigenous people because they can serve as a means of resistance and a way to assert their rights and sovereignty. Even if a rebellion does not achieve its immediate goals, it can raise awareness about the issues faced by indigenous people and contribute to the development of a sense of identity and community among them. Additionally, unsuccessful rebellions can provide valuable lessons for future resistance movements and can ultimately lead to long-term change.
A 5-8 sentence summary of how regulation/deregulation has been used in America’s history from the Graphic Novel using at least three academic vocabulary words below:
• business cycles
• capital resources
• consumer
• deficit spending
• fiscal policy
• national debt
• supply and demand
• factors of production
• inflation
• laissez faire
• market economy
• monetary policy
• profit
• opportunity cost
• scarcity
In America's history, regulation and deregulation have played a crucial role in shaping the economy. During times of economic growth and prosperity, the government often took a laissez faire approach and allowed the market economy to operate without interference.
How has Regulation and Deregulation been used in America?Regulation and deregulation have shaped the economy significantly throughout America's history. However, during times of economic recession, the government often intervened by using monetary and fiscal policies to boost economic activity. For example, increasing the national debt through deficit spending or lowering interest rates through monetary policy.
The government also regulates certain industries to protect consumers and ensure fair competition, while deregulating others to encourage innovation and investment of capital resources. However, regulations and government intervention can also lead to inflation and affect the allocation of scarce factors of production, leading to an opportunity cost.
Learn more about deregulation here: https://brainly.com/question/4676885
#SPJ1
there is no discernible link between planning and performance; whom is this position held by? (a) michael porter (b) milton friedman (c) gary hamel (d) henry mintzberg
Correct answer is option D. The position of whether there is a link between planning and performance is held by henry mintzberg.
Planning is an important part of any successful organization, and it is important to understand the relationship between planning and performance.
Planning involves setting goals, developing strategies, and implementing tactics to achieve those goals. Performance is the measure of how successful the organization is in achieving its goals. While the two concepts are related, there is no direct link between them.
Performance, on the other hand, is the measure of how successful the organization is in achieving its goals. It is important to measure performance in order to determine whether the organization is on track to meet its goals. Performance can be measured in terms of financial results, customer satisfaction, employee engagement, and other metrics.
To learn more about planning refer here
brainly.com/question/1933524#
#SPJ11
1. Why were some Americans angry at Hoover?
Explanation:
Many Americans were angry at President Herbert Hoover because his policies and actions during the early years of the Great Depression were seen as inadequate and ineffective. Hoover believed in the principles of voluntarism and self-reliance, and he initially resisted calls for the federal government to take a more active role in addressing the economic crisis. He also vetoed several bills that would have provided direct relief to the unemployed and farmers. As a result, many Americans felt that Hoover was out of touch with their struggles and was not doing enough to help them during the difficult economic times. This led to public discontent and widespread frustration with Hoover's leadership.
Criticizing the party in power and offering their own solutions to political problems characterize which of the following party roles?
A. Informing citizens
B. Acting as a watchdog
C. Helping manage government
D. Linking the different levels of government
Answer:
B. Acting as a watchdog.
Explanation:
B. Acting as a watchdog.
Acting as a watchdog is a key role of a political party, as it involves criticizing the party in power and offering their own solutions to political problems. This is done in order to ensure that the government is accountable to the public and that it is managing the country in a responsible and effective manner.
The other party roles of informing citizens, helping manage government, and linking the different levels of government involve providing information, facilitating government operations, and connecting different levels of government, respectively. They do not involve criticizing the party in power or offering their own solutions to political problems.
when did most countries hit bottom during the Great Depression?
Answer: The October 1929 downturn was only the beginning of the market collapse
Explanation: By mid-November the stock market had lost a third of its September value, and by 1932—when the market hit bottom—stocks had lost ninety percent of their value.
How is the quote, "There is a proverb that
explains when our enemy is
in the water up to the belt,
we must offer him our hand
and lift him out of peril; but
when he is up to his chin,
we must set our foot on his
head and drown him
outright." and “keep your friends close and your enemies closer” saying the same thing
Answer:
figure
Explanation:
Answer:
Both quotes convey the idea that it is important to be aware of one's enemies and be strategic in dealing with them.
Explanation:
The quote, "There is a proverb that explains when our enemy is in the water up to the belt, we must offer him our hand and lift him out of peril; but when he is up to his chin, we must set our foot on his head and drown him outright" is a variation of the saying "keep your friends close and your enemies closer" They are saying the same thing in the sense that both expressions convey the idea that it is important to be aware of one's enemies and to be strategic in how one deals with them. Both quotes suggest that one should not blindly trust one's enemies, but should instead be cautious and ready to take action when necessary. In the first quote is emphasizing the idea of keeping an eye on the enemy and being ready to act when the opportunity arises, while the second quote "keep your friends close and your enemies closer" is saying that you should be more aware of people who are close to you. Both quotes suggest that it is important to be strategic in one's relationships and to be aware of potential threats.
PLEASE HELP ASAP!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The North Atlantic Treaty Organization was founded primarily as a way to
coordinate defense against the Soviet Union
keep trade free so that tariffs would not increase prices
prevent Western European countries from remilitarizing
preserve British influence despite increasing American power
Answer:
first option
Explanation:
It is still around today and are trying hard to add Ukraine to the organization since the Russian invasion last year
Answer:
A. Coordinate defense against the soviet union
is the collection of "metadata" a violtion of the fourth amend to the coast, which protects americans from searchers and seizures without a warrant?
Answer:
Generally speaking, the collection of metadata is not considered a violation of the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. The Fourth Amendment protects Americans from unreasonable searches and seizures by government agents, but the collection of metadata does not typically qualify as a "search" or "seizure." However, there are situations where the collection of metadata could be considered a violation of the Fourth Amendment, such as when the government collects and stores information without a warrant.
Make Me As a Brainelist If You Like
Answer:
La prueba documental será presentada por la parte a quien le interese o cuando la autoridad judicial así lo requiera en los casos en que la Ley o la naturaleza de los hechos lo precisare.
Explanation:
after the civil war, how effective were policies enacted by the government in healing and providing justice to all its citizens?
The effectiveness of the government’s policies in healing and providing justice to all its citizens after the Civil War was mixed.
Healing and Providing Justice to All Citizens After the Civil WarSome programs, such as the Freedmen's Bureau, provided important aid to African Americans in the form of healthcare, education, and legal assistance. Other policies, such as Reconstruction and the Black Codes, fell short of providing true justice to African Americans in the form of voting rights and economic opportunity. Ultimately, the federal government’s efforts to heal and provide justice after the Civil War were hampered by the resistance of southern states and the failure of Congress to pass meaningful legislation to protect the rights of African Americans.
Learn more about Civil War: https://brainly.com/question/24992590
#SPJ4
how did germany form as a country
How did Bismarck unify and create a German state? Bismarck unified Germany under Prussian auspices through successful wars: against Denmark in 1864; against Austria in 1866, which excluded the Habsburgs, the traditional dynastic family of Germany; and then finally in 1870–71, with the defeat of France.
In your opinion, which side got the better deal in the Compromise of 1850, the North or the South? Why?
Answer: north but a slight edge.
Explanation:
In case you need a recap here are the 5 main points of the compromise of 1850:
1. california is a free state
2. new mexico and utah could pick whether to legalize slavery
3. mexican cessional territories could also pick
4. enforced stronger fugitive slave laws
5. abolition of slave trade in DC
from the beginning, the Missouri compromise was like putting a small bandage on a huge wound. didn't really help the antislavery or slaveowners settle the issue of what would be legal across the whole country, it instead promoted the south and the north to stay separated. the mexican-american war was waged by the federal government, and the outcome of the war didn't help solve sectional tensions either; it made it worse. ok yeah the north got another free state, along with the freedom of the capital that abolitionists worked very hard for, but the south was allowed to keep their business to themselves and who knows? the new territories in the west/midwest might permit slavery after all! so this is why for the most part the compromise was a pretty split deal, BUT...
the reason why i think the north had the slightest edge in this case is because they didn't strictly enforce the fugitive slave laws! you can see that with harriet tubman and her underground railroad, and in addition, reformers such as frederick douglass and harriet beecher stowe only continued to preach for antislavery, and it did lead to eventual changes. not only that, the settlers who moved to the territories in the west/midwest were families looking for new work opportunities/open up businesses (aligned with free soil ideals) so of course, they didn't want slaves because it would, again, ruin their chances of making profit. so you can prob guess what they voted for. and there you have it.
cheers,
a fellow apusher
Why do some consider our method for electing a president undemocratic
Some consider the method for electing a president in the United States undemocratic because of the use of an Electoral College system, rather than a direct popular vote. In the Electoral College system, citizens in each state cast their vote for president, and each state is allocated a number of electors based on its population.
The candidate who wins the majority of votes in a state wins all of that state's electors. The candidate who wins the majority of electors nationwide wins the presidency.
What is the criticism about?Critics argue that this system is undemocratic because it can result in a candidate winning the presidency without winning the popular vote. For example, in the 2000 and 2016 presidential elections, the winning candidate did not receive the most votes nationwide, but instead won the election through the Electoral College system.
Therefore, These factors have led some to argue that the Electoral College system is undemocratic and undermines the principle of one person, one vote. They argue that a direct popular vote would better reflect the will of the people and provide a more democratic method for electing a president.
Learn more about president from
https://brainly.com/question/707077
#SPJ1
See full question below
In the United States, Why do some consider our method for electing a president undemocratic
In 4-5 sentences per case, summarize each of the following 12 court cases and explain why each case was significant. ( it may be easier to type this in a word document and then cut and paste it here) Include the following in your answer: 1. Name and year of the court case 2. Two to three sentences (no more than 5) about the facts of the case 3. What is the Issue of the case? 4. One to two sentences on how the court ruled (ex. who did the court rule for) 5. One to two sentences about why this case is significant Marbury v. Madison Griswold v Connecticut Gideon v Wainwright Dred Scott v. Sandford Brown v. Board of Education Miranda v Arizona Mapp v Ohio Schenck v. United States Regents of the University of California v. Bakke Roe v Wade Tinker v. Des Moines Texas v Johnson
Madison. A significant ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court in Marbury v. Madison (1803) recognised for the first time that federal courts had the authority to invalidate a congressional act on the grounds that it contravened the U.S. Constitution.
137 Madison, 5 U.S. (1803) The Constitution cannot be changed by legislation passed by Congress, such as by extending the Supreme Court's original jurisdiction. One of the first and most significant Supreme Court decisions on federal authority is McCulloch v. Maryland (1819). The Supreme Court ruled in this case that Congress had implied authority resulting from those mentioned in Article I, Section 8. A national bank might be established by Congress according to the "Necessary and Proper" Clause. From the Golakhnath v. State of Punjab (1967) case until the Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India (1980) decision, the judicial review doctrine has been a fundamental component of the Indian legal system.
To learn more about Madison click the link below:
brainly.com/question/26135512
#SPJ4
how far could the historian make use of sources 1 and 2 together to investigate the effectiveness of the great leap forward
The historian's great leap forward can make use of sources 1 and 2 together to gain a more comprehensive and nuanced understanding of this significant historical event.
By combining quantitative and qualitative information, the historian can better evaluate the effectiveness of the Great Leap Forward and its impact on Chinese society. A significant economic and social initiative in China in the 1950s and 1960s. The historian can use these sources together to gain a more comprehensive understanding of this event and its outcomes.
Source 1 could provide a quantitative evaluation of the Great Leap Forward by analyzing data related to agricultural production, industrial output, and other economic indicators. For example, if source 1 contains official statistics, the historian can compare the economic performance during the Great Leap Forward to other periods and draw conclusions about the effectiveness of the initiative.
Source 2, on the other hand, could provide a qualitative evaluation of the Great Leap Forward by offering personal perspectives, narratives, and experiences of individuals who lived through the period. This type of source can provide valuable insight into the social, cultural, and political dimensions of the Great Leap Forward and how it affected everyday life. For example, if source 2 contains interviews with individuals who lived through the period, the historian can analyze the responses and gain insight into the perceptions of the initiative.
This approach can help the historian to draw more accurate conclusions about the effectiveness of the Great Leap Forward and its impact on society.
Learn more about great leap here;
https://brainly.com/question/526513#
#SPJ11
What is the meaning of Ephesians 2:8–9?
Ephesians 2:8–9 is a well-known verse that discusses God's grace in the realm of salvation. You are now rescued as a result of grace.
What sort of verse is that?
Verse is a term used to refer to various parts of poetry, such as a single line, a stanza, or the entire poem. As an example of verse, consider Edward Thomas' poem "As the Team's Head-Brass," which was composed in blank verse. A piece of writing is traditionally referred to as "verse" if it has metre. Free verse is now referred to as anything that includes other aspects of a poem, though, given how frequently it is employed in contemporary poetry. These consist of the usage of rhyme schemes, poetic language, and stanzas.
Know more about rescued Visit:
https://brainly.com/question/15890817
#SPJ4
what were the economic consequences of the French revolution
The French Revolution had a profound impact on the economy of France and Europe as a whole. One of the main economic consequences of the revolution was the abolition of feudalism and the redistribution of land. This led to the rise of a capitalist system and the emergence of a new class of wealthy capitalists who invested in industry and commerce.
The Revolution also led to the nationalization of many industries and companies, which greatly increased the power of the state in the economy. This led to the creation of new institutions such as the Bank of France, which helped to stabilize the currency and improve financial stability. However, the nationalization also led to a significant increase in government spending and high levels of inflation.
The revolution also led to a significant increase in government spending, which led to high levels of inflation and a large national debt. Additionally, the revolution led to the destruction of many businesses, which led to a decline in productivity and economic growth. The war with other European powers also had a negative impact on the economy, as it caused a shortage of goods and a rise in prices.
The revolution also led to the introduction of new taxes, which disproportionately affected the poor and middle classes. This led to widespread poverty and social unrest. The government also printed large amounts of paper money to finance its war efforts, which led to hyperinflation and economic collapse.
In short, the French Revolution had a complex impact on the economy, with both positive and negative consequences. The abolition of feudalism and the redistribution of land helped to create a capitalist system, but the nationalization of industry and commerce, the increase in government spending and taxes, and the war led to a decline in productivity and economic growth. The revolution also led to a significant increase in poverty and social unrest.
To know more about the French revolution:
https://brainly.com/question/21618621
What term is used to describe the period of time after the civil war when the seceded states were rebuilt and gradually brought back into the union?
How were the economies of ancient Mesopotamia, Egypt, and the Indus Valley similar?
a. Most of their populations were enslaved.
b. They all issued coins as money.
c. They did not trade with other regions.
d. They all relied on farming.
Answer:
The answer is D. Mesopotamia, Egypt, and the Indus River Valley relied on farming.
Explanation:
i found it from someone else i hope this helps
how did the marbury v. madison decision concerning an executive judicial appointment impact the development of federalism?
Marbury v. Madison was a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1803. It concerned an executive judicial appointment and had a significant impact on the development of federalism in the country.
In this case, the court established the principle of judicial review, which gives the Supreme Court the power to declare federal laws unconstitutional.
The case arose from the disagreement between William Marbury, a supporter of the Federalist party, and President Thomas Jefferson, who was a Democratic-Republican. Marbury was appointed as a justice of the peace by outgoing Federalist President John Adams, but Jefferson's Secretary of State, James Madison, refused to deliver Marbury's commission. Marbury sued Madison in the Supreme Court to have the commission delivered, but Chief Justice John Marshall ruled against him, stating that the Supreme Court did not have jurisdiction over the case.
However, Marshall used the opportunity to establish the principle of judicial review, which gives the Supreme Court the power to review and declare acts of Congress unconstitutional. This was a crucial development in the development of federalism because it helped to balance the powers between the federal government and the states. It also established the Supreme Court as a co-equal branch of government, with the power to check the actions of both the legislative and executive branches.
Marbury v. Madison was a pivotal moment in American history and solidified the role of the Supreme Court in interpreting the Constitution and preserving the balance of power between the branches of government. It also helped to establish the idea of the rule of law, which holds that the law applies equally to everyone, including the government.
Learn more about Marbury v. Madison here;
https://brainly.com/question/29268440#
#SPJ11
how accurate is it to say that soviet art and culture changed in the years 1917-1953
A series of actions known as the "cultural revolution" were taken in Soviet Russia and the Soviet Union in the years 1917-1953,with the intention of drastically altering the cultural and ideological fabric of society.
In order to develop a socialist society, it was intended to create a new sort of culture, which included increasing the number of members of the proletariat classes in the intelligentsia.
The Gordin brothers' "Anarchism Manifesto" from May 1917 first used the term "cultural revolution" in Russia, is used by Vladimir Lenin for the first time in his essay "On Cooperation" written in 1923, to define it as "a whole revolution.
To learn more about cultural revolution, refer
https://brainly.com/question/10693549
#SPJ4
Write a grant proposal from the viewpoint of official. In the proposal, ask the federal government for a grant that will have a positive impact on your community
The (name of the community) is requesting a grant from the federal government to fund the implementation of a (program name). This program aims to (describe program objective). Our community is facing significant (problem/issue), and this will address this by (describe how program will solve problem/issue). The grant will provide the necessary resources to (describe how grant will be used). With the support of this grant, we believe that we can make a positive and lasting impact on our community. We are confident that this program will be successful in addressing the needs of our community and we hope to receive your support.
The Magna Carta greatly influenced Britih and American political thought by requiring government to adhere to the rule of law and recognizing the exitence of right of ubject
The Magna Carta is widely regarded as one of the most influential legal documents in the history of democracy.
It created the foundation of the rule of law, by requiring the King and his government to adhere to the same laws as everyone else. It was one of the earliest documents to recognize the existence of rights of subjects, such as trial by jury, the right to due process, and protection from illegal imprisonment, which are fundamental to democracy today. The Magna Carta had a profound impact on the development of both British and American political thought. In the United States, the Magna Carta is seen as a foundation of the Constitution and is referred to in the Declaration of Independence.
Here's the full task:
The Magna Carta greatly influenced British and American political thought by requiring government to adhere to the rule of law and recognizing the existence of right of subject.
What impact did the Magna Carta have on British and American political thought?
Learn more about Magna Carta: https://brainly.com/question/25378155
#SPJ4
