Extending working hours can be a sensitive issue, as it can impact the well-being and work-life balance of employees. There are several reasons why an organization may consider extending working hours, but not all reasons are considered valid.
Some of the valid reasons for extending working hours may include:
Increased demand for products or services: When there is an increase in demand for a company's products or services, the organization may need to extend working hours in order to meet the demand and keep up with production.Shortage of staff: When there is a shortage of staff, extending working hours can help ensure that all tasks are completed and that the workload is evenly distributed among available personnel.Seasonal changes: In certain industries, such as retail or hospitality, working hours may need to be extended during peak seasons in order to accommodate increased demand.However, not all reasons for extending working hours are considered valid. Some of the invalid reasons for extending working hours may include:
To punish employees: Extending working hours as a form of punishment is not a valid reason and is not an ethical practice.Lack of proper planning or organization: If a company has not properly planned for workload or staffing needs, extending working hours is not a valid solution.To avoid hiring additional staff: If a company is avoiding hiring additional staff in order to save on costs, extending working hours is not a valid reason.To now more about extending working hours refer to-
brainly.com/question/556122#
#SPJ11
Complete Question
What are the valid and invalid reasons for extending working hours?
Which type of clause describes the following statement: "We have issued the policy in consideration of the representations in your applications and payment of the first-term premium".
The consideration clause describes the following statement: "We have issued the policy in consideration of the representations in your applications and payment of the first-term premium".
Consideration clauses are employed to specify the overall sum required for the transaction at hand.
They are the conditions and terms that specify how compensation is distributed in return for equal consideration.
Some consideration clauses involve sanctions if one party doesn't fulfil their obligations.
Consideration clauses are frequently used in contracts for real estate and insurance. In essence, they provide the conditions under which one party pays another party for a valued item, such as a house or insurance policy.
As part of a share purchase agreement, they could also be applied when selling shares to a buyer.
Consideration clauses in this situation demonstrate the existence of reciprocal consideration.
To know more about the consideration clause, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/14550374
#SPJ4
ap psych what are the major criticisms of the use of punishment?
The major criticisms of use of punishment are- Across all nations and cultures, corporal punishment is associated with a number of detrimental effects on children, including poor physical and mental health, delayed cognitive and socioemotional development, subpar academic performance, increased aggression, and the use of violence.
Any form of punishment has a very limited ability to change behaviour and shouldn't ever be the only tool used to control conduct. Three factors account for this: Working with mice or people, the undesirable behaviour always returns as soon as the punishment or prospect of punishment is removed.
Children who are physically punished may become more violent and antisocial as well as more prone to mental illness. Children who are physically punished learn that physical aggression is acceptable. It does not assist children in acquiring wholesome, useful coping mechanisms to deal with unpleasant feelings and circumstances.
To know more about Punishment, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/14228660
#SPJ4
the law has developed several rules which attempt to balance the interests of the minor and the other party. these rules are found in
Answer:
sales of good act
Explanation:
The law Standards for Privacy of Individually Identifiable Health Information are the set of guidelines that make an effort to balance the interests of the minor and the other party.
All people and institutions within a country, state, or community, including legislators and authorities, must abide by the same laws, according to the political premise of the rule of law. The "system, method, institution, practise, or norm that protects the equality of all citizens before the law, provides a nonarbitrary kind of government, and more generally precludes the arbitrary use of power," as defined by the Encyclopedia Britannica, is the rule of law. The concept of the "rule of law," which has close ties to both constitutionalism and Rechtsstaat, refers to a political reality rather than a specific legal principle. British usage of the expression dates back to the sixteenth century. Samuel Rutherford, a Scottish theologian, used it to challenge the idea of the divine right to reign in the century.
To know more about law please refer:
https://brainly.com/question/27557368
#SPJ4
imagine that you were of a different nationality, what would change in you aside from your citizenship and origin?
If a person were of a different nationality, several things could change for them beyond just their citizenship and origin. Some of these changes could include: cultural identity, language, social networks etc.
1. Cultural Identity: A change in nationality could lead to a shift in cultural identity, as the individual may adopt the values, traditions, and beliefs of their new culture.
2. Language: A different nationality or citizenship often means speaking a different language, which could impact the individual's communication and ability to integrate into their new society.
3. Social and Professional Network: Moving to a new country can also mean leaving behind personal and professional networks, and building new connections.
4. Economic and Political Systems: A different nationality could mean exposure to different economic and political systems, which could have an impact on the individual's personal and professional life.
5. Perception and Treatment by Others: A change in nationality could also affect how the individual is perceived and treated by others, based on cultural and societal stereotypes and biases.
Overall, a change in nationality has the potential to bring both challenges and opportunities, and can have a profound impact on a person's personal and professional life.
To know more about citizenship please refer: https://brainly.com/question/18099945
#SPJ4
why must a propertys legal description be in the sales contract
A legal description serves as official proof of the boundaries and enables a surveyor to precisely identify property lines in the future. This is very important and helpful in real estate deals and disputes. Usually, both the property deed and sales contracts will include the description.
A legal description is a written document that precisely identifies a specific piece of property. Depending on where the property is located in the US, this description can be written in a few different ways. However, when describing a same geographic location, the descriptions will frequently use the same terminology.
The county and state in which a piece of land is situated must always be mentioned in legal descriptions of real estate. Beyond that, the description must include sufficient details such that a qualified licenced surveyor might later revisit and precisely locate the property lines. Rectangular surveys, metes and bounds, and the lot and block systems are the most popular techniques used to produce legal descriptions.
To know more about sales contracts, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/29350867
#SPJ4
assuming that a decedent left no valid last will and testament, which of the following assets will pass by the laws of intestate succession? property in an inter vivos trust established by the decedent in which the decedent was the income beneficiary at the time of death, and the decedent's children were remainder beneficiaries property held by the decedent and his spouse as tenants in common property held by the decedent and his spouse as community property property in an inter vivos trust established by the decedent's father in which the decedent was the income beneficiary at the time of death, and the decedent's children were remainder beneficiaries a) iii and iv b) i, ii, and iv c) i and ii d) ii and iii
Here, two years before the decedent's demise, a life insurance policy on the decedent/grantor was converted into an irrevocable life insurance trust (ILIT) for the benefit of the decedent's children.
A life insurance policy is only a contract between a person and an insurance company, in which the business agrees to make a number of instalment payments over time in exchange for paying a set quantity of money to the individual's family or beneficiaries.
These payments, often known as "premiums," are frequently made yearly. The person who purchases the insurance is the policyholder. When an insured person passes away unexpectedly, life insurance ensures a lump sum payout to the insured's family.
For such more question on life insurance policy
https://brainly.com/question/1373572
#SPJ4
does meaningless nickname as username personal information?
No, meaningless nickname as a username is not considered personal information. Personal information is information that can be used to identify a specific individual, such as full name, address, social security number, etc. A meaningless username does not have any of these identifying characteristics and therefore is not considered personal information.
However, it's important to note that in certain contexts, a username can still be considered personal information, such as when it is combined with other information that can identify an individual. For example, if a username is combined with an email address, the combination could be considered personal information. It is important to understand the context and how information is being used in order to determine whether it is considered personal information.
Learn more about personal information here:
https://brainly.com/question/30023243
#SPJ4
how ethics and civilization may endure in a world of diversity and nation-state
Ethics and civilization can endure in a diverse world through the promotion of universal values and principles.
Universal values, such as respect for human rights and the rule of law, provide a common moral framework that can guide behavior and decision-making across cultures and borders.
In a world of increasing diversity and nation-states, it is important to maintain ethical standards and preserve civilization by encouraging dialogue and cooperation among nations.
This can help to build bridges between different cultures and promote understanding and respect for diverse perspectives. Additionally, fostering a global culture of tolerance and inclusiveness can help to create a sense of community and shared responsibility for maintaining ethical standards and preserving civilization.
This can be achieved through education, media, and other forms of cultural exchange, as well as through international institutions that promote cooperation and collaboration on issues of shared concern.
By working together to promote universal values and principles, we can help to ensure that ethics and civilization endure in a world of diversity and nation-states.
To know more about Universal values click on the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/27994235#
#SPJ11
The ethical principle of _____ has been violated if a researcher decides to place participants he finds more attractive into the experimental condition he believes has the greatest benefit.
Choose matching definition
O informed consent
O justice
O power
O respect for persons
The ethical principle of justice has been violated if a researcher decides to place participants, he finds more attractive into the experimental condition he believes has the greatest benefit.
You must follow the ethical guidelines established by regulatory organisations in order to safeguard study participants, the general public, and the researcher themselves. If a researcher chooses to place volunteers into the experimental condition, he thinks would be most beneficial, he has broken the ethical norm of justice.
Research ethics are moral principles that aid researchers in carrying out and disseminating their work without lying or purposely or unintentionally harming study participants or other members of society. You may ensure that your study is honest and authentic by upholding ethical standards, which will also boost your credibility and get more public support.
To know more about research, refer to the following link:
https://brainly.com/question/26057974
#SPJ4
A right, privilege or interest limited to a specific purpose which one party has in the land of another. To use the land of another for ingress and egress for entry and exit of anothers property.
how do codes of ethics affect professional service delivery?
Codes of ethics guide professionals to act with integrity and adhere to moral principles, enhancing quality of service and building trust with clients.
Codes of ethics serve as a foundation for professional behavior and decision making in various industries. They outline a set of moral principles, such as confidentiality, objectivity, and competence, that guide professionals in their interactions with clients and colleagues. Adherence to these codes helps to enhance the quality of service delivery and build trust between the professional and the client. When professionals act ethically, they demonstrate their commitment to their field and to their clients, creating a positive reputation for themselves and their organization. In this way, codes of ethics play a vital role in maintaining standards of excellence and fostering positive relationships in the delivery of professional services.
Learn more about Codes of ethics here:
https://brainly.com/question/28268879
#SPJ4
A bicyclist sued a motorist in federal court sitting in diversity jurisdiction for damages resulting from an accident. The complaint alleged that the accident was caused by the motorist's negligence and sought damages in a specific amount. The motorist, in his answer, specifically denied allegations in the complaint that related to his liability, but did not address the allegations relating to damages sought by the bicyclist. Consequently, the bicyclist contends that the motorist has conceded the issue of damages.Is the bicyclist correct?
A
No, because the failure to deny an allegation relating to the amount of damages does not deem that allegation admitted.
B
No, because in a tort action, the denial of allegations relating to liability is treated as a denial of allegations relating to damages.
C
Yes, because, as the defendant specifically denied allegations relating to liability, failure to deny the allegations relating to damages is treated as an admission.
D
Yes, because an allegation in the plaintiff's complaint is deemed admitted if not denied by the defendant.
A federal trademark belonging to the plaintiff was allegedly violated by the defendant, and $55,000 in damages were demanded in the complaint.
What two situations would not fall within federal jurisdiction based on diversity of citizenship?In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 1332, "diversity jurisdiction" exists in federal court when two requirements are satisfied. First, the sum at issue must be greater than $75,000 in value. The second requirement is that every plaintiff and defendant must have distinct nationalities.
The Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 1332 is what, exactly?The legal representative of a baby or incompetent shall be deemed to be a citizen only of the same State as the infant or incompetent, and the legal representative of a deceased person's estate shall be deemed to be a citizen only of the same State as the decedent.
To Know more about trademark Visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28851180?
#SPJ1
why should documentation and record keeping requirements be integrated into policies and procedures?
Documentation and record keeping requirements should be integrated into policies and procedures for several reasons like compliance, accountability, improved processes.
Compliance: Documentation and record keeping are often required by law or industry regulations. Integrating these requirements into policies and procedures ensures that an organization is in compliance with these regulations.
Accountability: Documentation and record keeping provide a clear and detailed record of decisions, actions, and results. By integrating these requirements into policies and procedures, an organization can maintain accountability and ensure that its activities are transparent and verifiable.
Improved processes: Integrating documentation and record keeping requirements into policies and procedures helps to ensure that information is captured consistently and accurately, leading to improved processes and better decision-making.
Evidence of best practices: Documentation and record keeping can be used to demonstrate that an organization follows best practices, and can provide evidence of compliance with regulations and policies.
In summary, integrating documentation and record keeping requirements into policies and procedures helps organizations to maintain compliance, accountability, improve processes, and demonstrate best practices.
To know more about procedures please refer: https://brainly.com/question/14956758
#SPJ4
The forensic part of forensic evidence refers to the scientific process through which facts are generated and the evidence part refers to a distinct set of procedures that are unique to the litigation process.
True/False
True: The forensic part of forensic evidence refers to the scientific process through which facts are generated and the evidence part refers to a distinct set of procedures that are unique to the litigation process.
Items or data gathered for use in court cases utilizing scientific techniques are referred to as forensic evidence. To aid investigators in solving crimes, a variety of forensic evidence can be collected. The first thing that detectives do when they arrive at a crime scene is secure the area to protect any tangible evidence.
Police can find the offender or offenders by conducting a thorough investigation of the evidence. Investigators will be seeking for samples of other bodily fluids, such as saliva or semen, that they can examine for DNA evidence in addition to blood evidence. Even though this forensic evidence might not be sufficient to convict an accused person on its own, it might help to link that person to the crime.
To know more about forensic evidence, refer to the following link:
https://brainly.com/question/28296347
#SPJ4
what is the failure to comply with the liquor licence and control act 2019?
The Liquor Act sets out three primary objectives. They are: to minimise alcohol abuse; that the sale and supply of alcohol meets the community's expectations; and that the balanced development of the industry is weighed against the need for controls and restrictions.
The ACT Government customer and regulatory service agency – is responsible for regulating the liquor industry. In the ACT, there is a licence and permit available for clubs depending upon the circumstances.Identify customers to whom sale or service must be refused according to state and territory legislation, including minors, those purchasing on behalf of minors, intoxicated persons, and persons affected by the consumption of illicit and other drugs.Anyone found violating any of the provisions may face the penalty of imprisonment of not less than one year but not more than six years without probation,” said PNP Chief Officer-in-Charge/Security Task Force Commander, Lt. Gen.They use the primary legislation—of which they are the one that controls alcohol sales and service—to enforce the liquor Act and licencing act. They were able to offer the guidelines or laws that each vendor and buyer must abide by; failure to do so can result in violations and subsequent penalties.
To learn more about Liquor Act, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/4833015
#SPJ4
aubrey carson was recently hired by a local cpa firm. her first assignment is to create a tax memorandum explaining the different sources of tax law and where their authority comes from. research and cite the appropriate irc section that authorizes the treasury secretary to provide administrative interpretation of the tax law.
Explanation:
The government seams to have a new meaning, for new tax laws, which mostly favors the authors of the law. However the section that authorizes the treasury secretary to give his own interpretation , most likely the I. R. S. Zar.
Read through this scenario and identify the type of criminal defense most likely used. Provide a 2-3 sentence explanation.
An undercover federal agent locates a group of men who seem to be frustrated with the government in a rural area of Indiana. The agent begins talking to the men about
planting a bomb at a rally for a local politician. The men laugh and joke, but then the conversation gets serious. The agent gives advice and tells the men where they can obtain
the materials. After a couple of weeks of conversation, the men meet the undercover agent to assemble the bomb and plan the crime. Before the crime can occur, FBI agents
swoop in and arrest the men with the evidence collected by the undercover agent.
What criminal defense can be used? Explain.
Entrapment Defense is most likely used in this scenario.
Entrapment is a defense to criminal charges where the defendant claims that they only committed the crime because they were induced or coerced by law enforcement officials. In this case, the men may argue that the undercover federal agent induced them to participate in the crime and that they would not have committed the crime if it weren't for the agent's coercion.
what specific arguments does cato make against the structure of the legislative branch?
In an amicus brief in support of that petition, Cato makes the case that the separation of powers is violated by such unrestricted authority. According to the Constitution, Congress has "full legislative power," and the executive branch only has the authority to implement laws, not make or change them.
An anti-federalist author (perhaps George Clinton) claims in Cato III that the US Constitution establishes a government that consists of too many people who are dispersed too widely. He contends that this would distance citizens from the centre of authority to a point where tyranny would unavoidably result.
The Letters are regarded as a foundational text in the Commonwealth men's canon. The 144 essays, which denounced corruption and a lack of morality in the British political system and issued warnings against oppressive rule and the abuse of power, were first published in the London Journal and then later in the British Journal.
To know more about Constitution, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/29799909
#SPJ4
For many years, hospitals could not be sued successfully for malpractice because of the legal doctrine known as _________.
a. the almshouse exception
b. charitable immunity
c. separation of church and state
d. absolution
For many years, hospitals could not be sued successfully for malpractice because of the legal doctrine known as charitable immunity. Therefore, the option B holds true.
There are different legal doctrines available to the citizens as per the legal documents of the United States regulated under the National Constitution. One such doctrine is that of charitable immunity, wherein the hospitals do not have the capacity of being sued, as the doctors are legally liable for any malpractices that they undertake.
Learn more about the legal doctrine here:
https://brainly.com/question/986777
#SPJ4
Consider your daily routine and government agencies that you may interact with as you pump gas, buy groceries, go to work or make purchases in the store or online. Locate an agency (federal, state or local) and prepare a short summary of the agency including when and why it was created as well as how you interact with it.
Answer:
One example of a government agency that I interact with on a daily basis is the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). The FTC was created in 1914 as part of the Federal Trade Commission Act, with the purpose of protecting consumers from unfair business practices, such as false advertising and monopolies.
I interact with the FTC in various ways. For example, when I make purchases online or in-store, the FTC ensures that the advertisements and marketing materials used by the companies are truthful and not misleading. The FTC also works to prevent companies from engaging in anti-competitive practices that would limit consumer choices or raise prices. Additionally, the FTC also has a role in protecting personal data and ensuring that companies implement adequate data security measures.
The FTC also provides information and resources for consumers to learn about their rights and how to protect themselves from fraud and scams. I can access these resources on the FTC's website, and I can also file a complaint with the FTC if I believe that a company has engaged in unfair or deceptive practices. The FTC also regularly takes action against companies that violate consumer protection laws and regulations, resulting in fines and penalties.
why do you suppose the clery family pressed the federal government to pass the clery disclosure of campus security policy and campus crime statistics act?
Public and private colleges and universities are required by the Jeanne Clery Disclosure of Campus Security Policy and Campus Crime Statistics Act, or the Clery Act, to provide information on specific crimes that take place on or near campus.
Colleges and universities are required by the Campus Crime Awareness and Campus Security Act of 1990, as amended (also referred to as the "Clery Act"), and the Campus Fire Safety Right-to-Know Act, both of which were passed into law in 2008, to give timely warnings of crimes that pose a threat to the campus community and to publish an annual security report. without the victim's consent, particularly when the victim is unable to give consent.
To learn more about Campus, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/30005813
#SPJ4
The separation of powers doctrine applies only to the federal government and not to state governments.
True
False
prosecutors have the option to dismiss cases through a nolo contendere. group of answer choices true false
False. the right to counsel is guaranteed in the sixth amendment.
Public prosecutors are public authorities who, on behalf of society and in the public interest, ensure the application of the law where the breach of the law carries a criminal sanction, taking into account both the rights of the individual and the necessary effectiveness of the criminal justice system.
plea bargaining was used by the judges to encourage confessions. With the evolution of criminal justice system, plea bargaining is now used for the faster disposal of criminal cases and to lessen the burden on the courts
When laws conflict, nearly all institutions of higher education must follow ___ laws related to alcohol or other drugs.
Federal
When laws conflict nearly all institutions must follow the federal laws related to alcohol or other drugs.
This is due to the ultimate clause of the constitution, which gives priority to federal legislation over all other laws. The supremacy clause stipulates that all other national laws are subordinate to federal law. The institutions are required to follow federal law since it is the highest law in the case of a conflict between two laws.
Laws that have been ratified by both houses of Congress, with the president's signature, have survived the president's veto, or have been allowed to go into effect without the president's signature are considered to be federal laws.
To learn more about federal laws, visit the link below:
brainly.com/question/28498485
#SPJ4
What was the most significant governmental action in the 1960s and 1970s to radically change the EMS
situation?
A) The EMS Services Development Act of 1973
B) President Johnson's 1965 President Commission on Highway Safety
C) The Highway Safety Act of 1966
D) Candidate Physical Ability Test (CPAT)
when you operate a motor vehicle on virginia’s roadways, you have agreed to take a chemical test for alcohol if suspected of drinking and driving _________________.
When you operate a motor vehicle on virginia’s roadways, you have agreed to take a chemical test for alcohol if suspected of drinking and driving by law.
Virginia is an implied consent state, meaning that by operating a motor vehicle on its roadways, drivers are deemed to have given consent to a chemical test for alcohol if suspected of drinking and driving.
Refusing to take the test can result in automatic suspension of your driver's license for one year.
In Virginia, a law enforcement officer may request a chemical test if they have probable cause to believe the driver is under the influence of alcohol. The test can be either a breathalyzer, blood test, or urine test. If the test results show a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of 0.08% or higher, the driver will be charged with driving under the influence (DUI).
It is important to remember that even if you feel sober, you can still be over the legal BAC limit. Therefore, it is always recommended to refrain from drinking and driving to avoid any legal or personal consequences.
Read more about law enforcement officer
https://brainly.com/question/28173529#
#SPJ11
What issues and/or policy areas would interest you as a Congressional intern and why?
I am interested in what role science plays in government. Also, if chosen to participate in this program, it would be an honor to represent Texas Tech as a future tier one research institution.
I would be interested in working in the office of a congressperson that sits on the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology. If the USA is to remain a superpower, then it is this committee that will play a major role in preventing us from becoming a superpower of some bygone golden age. Bottom line, more funding needs to be allocated to universities for research. Research labs should not have to turn to industry to provide funding for what the government should be doing.
Also, I am very interested in policy issues that are deemed controversial. I am very open on the stance that I take on some of these issues. I care about gay rights, but there is one other issue that I am more concerned with above all else. That issue is abortion. This is a legitimate issue that our government always struggles with from election to election. Everybody has an opinion on this issue, but yet people would rather deem it taboo. I know touchy subject and probably something an applicant should not touch in an application. However, I think it is far more dangerous to just ignore the issue and not talk about it. On the issue of abortion, I have always taken the stance that I don’t care about abortion in other parts of the world, but here in the USA, we can care for our own.
I am curious about what function learning plays in management. Also, if preferred to take part as a Congressional intern, it is hopefully an honor to show Texas Tech as a future-level individual research organization.
I am hopefully concerned in active in the commission of a legislator that sits on the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology. The bottom line, more capital needs to be expected assigned to academies for research. Research labs concede the possibility not should count on manufacturing to determine capital for that reason the administration endure be an achievement.
This is a valid issue that our management forever struggles accompanying from voting to choosing. Everybody has a belief on this issue, but still, the population favors regards it as taboo. On the issue of failure, I have continually captured the posture that I don’t care about failure in additional parts of the experience, but present in the USA, we can take care of our own.
To know more about legislator refer to: https://brainly.com/question/29329556
#SPJ4
According to the US Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and Department of Homeland Security (DHS), which of the following is a possible sign that someone is a victim of human trafficking?
a. The person is very familiar with the neighborhood
b. The person lives far away from the work premises
c. The person often moves among various work sites
d. The person appears to travel alone very frequently
Out of the given choices, it may be stated that when a person often moves among various work sites, then it is a possible sign that he or she is a victim of human trafficking as per the US Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the Department of Homeland Security. Therefore, the option C holds true.
The practice of human trafficking is a common crime relevant in the American society. This has existed in the American society ever since the practices of slavery were active. However, after an amendment in the constitution, this practice of human trafficking has been termed as illegal.
Learn more human trafficking here:
https://brainly.com/question/28182536
#SPJ4
which side, students or administrators, is better supported by the existing case law? provide three facts that support your argument.
In the United States, the existing case law regarding the rights of students and administrators in educational institutions has generally supported the side of administrators, especially in regards to matters of discipline and maintaining order in schools. Here are three facts that support this argument:
The Supreme Court has upheld the authority of school administrators to maintain discipline and control in schools, even if this involves limiting the free speech rights of students.The court has also recognized the unique needs of schools to maintain order and safety and has given administrators broad discretion in making decisions related to discipline and student conduct.In many cases, the courts have deferred to the expertise and judgment of school administrators in matters of educational policy and discipline, and have limited the ability of students to challenge such decisions in court.It is important to note that this general trend in the case law can vary depending on the specific circumstances of each case and the laws of each state.
Of the 50 U.S. states, the only one that it did not choose to essentially follow the English common law was . . . Louisiana
The statement that Louisiana was the only one that it did not choose to essentially follow the English common law is True.
Why does Louisiana not follow English Common Law ?Louisiana chose to adopt the Napoleonic Code as its legal system, which was based on the French civil law tradition. This decision was due to Louisiana's history as a French colony before it was sold to the United States in the Louisiana Purchase of 1803.
The state's unique legal system has distinct differences from the English common law system followed by the other 49 states, including the use of a civil law code and the presence of a civil law court system.
Find out more on English Common Law at https://brainly.com/question/7413269
#SPJ1
Options for this question include:
True False