Your question is: Which sentence uses a dependent clause to show a cause-and-effect relationship? The correct answer is sentence 1: "Because the power went out, none of the clocks have the right time."
In this sentence, the dependent clause "Because the power went out" shows the cause, and the effect is that "none of the clocks have the right time." In a sentence, dependent clauses may come either before or after an independent clause. They must be coupled with punctuation in particular ways depending on where they are in the phrase. A comma must separate the dependent clause from the independent clause if it appears in the sentence before the independent clause.
To know more about Punctuation refer :
brainly.com/question/30277583
#SPJ11
Which question is not answered by the article? A. How many students have developed heart disease because of steroids? B. How many student athletes have been tested for steroids since 2006? C. Why is steroid use promoted in some circles? D. What are the harmful effects of taking steroids?
Answer:
The question not answered by the article is:
A. How many students have developed heart disease because of steroids?
Explanation:
The question not answered by the article is A. How many students have developed heart disease because of steroids?
The article may not specifically provide information about the number of students who have developed heart disease due to steroids. It may focus on other aspects such as testing for steroids, reasons for promoting steroid use, or harmful effects of taking steroids, but may not specifically address the number of students with heart disease related to steroid use.
ray was self-conscious about his philadelphia accent when giving speeches at his college in texas. he was afraid some people in the audience would make fun of his dialect. which of the following recommendations would help ray? multiple select question. if the dialect is heavy, consider neutralizing it for audiences not familiar with it. remember that audiences probably do not notice a speaker's dialect. don't worry; it is up to the listener to understand a speaker's dialect. remember that no dialect is inferior to another.
Ray can take several steps to help himself feel more confident when giving speeches at his college in Texas, despite his self-consciousness about his Philadelphia accent.
First, he can try to neutralize his accent if it is particularly heavy, as this will make it easier for audiences who are not familiar with it to understand him. However, it is important to remember that audiences are often not as critical of a speaker's dialect as the speaker may fear. In fact, most people do not notice or care about a speaker's accent, as long as they can understand what they are saying.
Furthermore, Ray can remind himself that no dialect is inherently better or worse than another. Each dialect is a reflection of a person's unique background and experiences, and should be respected as such. Finally, Ray can seek out opportunities to practice public speaking in a supportive and inclusive environment, such as a public speaking club or workshop, where he can receive constructive feedback on his delivery and build his confidence over time.
By taking these steps, Ray can overcome his self-consciousness and become a more effective and confident public speaker.
For more question on speeches
https://brainly.com/question/26157848
#SPJ11
Hope is the thing with feathers by Emily dickenson
Step #1: Read the poem all the way through at least TWO times
What is your first impression of the poem?
What is the poem's structure (are the lines short or long)?
© Do the lines rhyme?
• Step #2: Read the title of the poem
• How does the title relate to the information in the poem?
• Does the title paint a picture to help you understand the information?
• Does the title help provide a time frame or setting?
•Step #3: Understand the speaker of the poem o Who tells the poem?
• Does the poem give clues about the speaker's personality?
• Who is the speaker talking to?
Step #4: Feel for the mood (words used) and tone (emotions)
• Based on the poem, how does the speaker feel (sad, angry, happy)?
o What attitude does the speaker have?
• Does the speaker change his/her mood or tone?
ep #5: Paraphrase the poem
• Apply what you've read and learned
• Restate information stanza-by-stanza (group of 4 lines;
paragraph)
Decode meaning of words or phrases
Answer:
Step #1: Upon reading the poem "Hope is the thing with feathers" by Emily Dickinson, my first impression is that it is a poem about hope, and how it is personified as a bird with feathers. The poem is relatively short, with four stanzas of four lines each. The lines are relatively short and do not follow a strict rhyme scheme, although some lines do rhyme.
Step #2: The title "Hope is the thing with feathers" relates to the information in the poem as it directly refers to the personification of hope as a bird with feathers. The title does paint a picture in the reader's mind of a bird with feathers, and it helps the reader understand the imagery used in the poem. The title does not provide a time frame or setting.
Step #3: The speaker of the poem is not explicitly identified, but it can be assumed to be the poet, Emily Dickinson. The poem does not give many clues about the speaker's personality, other than the fact that they are describing the concept of hope. The speaker is not talking to anyone in particular, but rather reflecting on their own thoughts and feelings.
Step #4: The mood of the poem is uplifting and positive, as it focuses on the idea of hope. The tone is one of admiration and awe towards the concept of hope, with the speaker describing it as a powerful force that can overcome obstacles. The speaker does not change their mood or tone throughout the poem.
Step #5: The poem can be paraphrased as follows: Hope is a thing that can be compared to a bird with feathers. It can be found in the soul, and it sings a tune without words. It never stops singing, even in the midst of stormy weather, and it asks for nothing in return. It is a constant source of comfort and support, and it can help us overcome even the most difficult of circumstances.:
How does Nora recall the "last three years"?
Nora, the protagonist in Henrik Ibsen's play "A Doll's House," recalls the last three years as a period of personal growth and self-discovery. Initially, she lived a sheltered life under her husband Torvald's control, acting as a submissive wife and doting mother. Throughout the three years, Nora experienced a series of events that challenged her identity and sense of self.
She took on the responsibility of secretly borrowing money to finance a trip for her husband's health, something that was frowned upon for women at the time. This decision marked the beginning of Nora's gradual awakening to her own capabilities and desires outside her role as a wife and mother.
As the play progresses, Nora becomes increasingly aware of her own individuality and the constraints placed on her by society and her marriage. She starts to question the unequal dynamics in her relationship with Torvald, and her frustration grows as she recognizes the extent of her husband's control and manipulation.
The culmination of these events leads to Nora's decision to leave her husband and children, asserting her independence and claiming her right to self-fulfillment. Thus, Nora recalls the last three years as a transformative journey from subservience and dependence to self-awareness and autonomy.
TO KNOW MORE ABOUT Nora recall the "last three years" CLICK THIS LINK -
brainly.com/question/28271121
#SPJ11
In sentence 2, the word whom
A.
should be written as who.
B.
should be written as which.
C.
should be written as whose.
D.
should be written as that.
Answer:
A. Who is the correct answer
Explanation:
The reason is for example say you ask who did he take to the bowling alley? (This is just an example) You could say Whom did he take to the bowling alley?
native speakers of the lakota language were amused when they saw the movie dances with wolves because ________
Native speakers of the Lakota language were amused when they saw the movie Dances with Wolves because the language spoken in the film was incorrect and did not make sense.
The movie used a Lakota language consultant to ensure authenticity, but many of the words and phrases used in the movie were not accurate and did not match the context or situation.
Additionally, the use of subtitles to translate the Lakota language in the film was also not accurate and often conveyed a different meaning than what was actually being said.
As a result, native speakers found the portrayal of the language and culture in the movie to be inaccurate and unrealistic. This highlights the importance of accurate representation of languages and cultures in media and the potential harm that can result from inaccurate portrayals.
To know more about Lakota language refer to-
https://brainly.com/question/7912230
#SPJ11
can you guys help please ;0
Consider Goldman’s reference to Edward Carpenter’s view of the “Two sexes.” Do you think it is applicable even today, or in your opinion do boys or girls grow up understanding each other better than they did a hundred years ago? How does Carpenter’s view help support her argument?
According to Edward Carpenter, the foundation of every marriage is the two sexes' respective lifelong environments, which are so unlike from one another that men and women must continue to be strangers.
Marriage has little chance of fostering the mutual understanding and respect that are essential to a successful partnership and are kept apart by an impenetrable wall of superstition, tradition, and habit. Probably the first person to understand this enormous truth was Henrik Ibsen, the despiser of all societal shams.
Instead of leaving her husband because she is fed up with her duties or feels the need for women's rights, as the ignorant critic would have it, Nora does so because she has discovered that she had been cohabitating with a stranger for eight years and had children with him.
Learn more about argument here:
https://brainly.com/question/31218461
#SPJ1
Nora says that "...dogs don't bite nice little dolly children"--what does this indicate about her role with her children?
Nora's statement that "dogs don't bite nice little dolly children" suggests that she perceives her role with her children as somewhat detached and superficial. By referring to her children as "dolly children," she implies that she views them as playthings rather than fully developed individuals with their own thoughts and emotions. This may indicate that she does not engage deeply with her children, instead focusing on keeping up appearances and maintaining a pleasant environment.
Additionally, the mention of dogs not biting "nice" children highlights Nora's emphasis on outward behavior and conforming to social expectations. Her role with her children may primarily involve teaching them to adhere to societal norms and act appropriately in various situations, rather than fostering their unique identities and nurturing their individual growth.
Overall, Nora's comment reflects a limited and superficial understanding of her role as a mother, prioritizing surface-level appearances and conformity over deeper emotional connections and personal development.
to know more about dogs don't bite nice little dolly children" click this link -
brainly.com/question/30435088
#SPJ11
What are the part of speech and meaning of specific when the suffix is changed from -ic to -ify?
When the suffix -ic is changed to -ify, the part of speech changes from an adjective to a verb. Specifically, the suffix -ify means "to make into" or "to cause to become" the adjective that it is derived from. Therefore, if we take the adjective specific and add the suffix -ify, we get the verb form specificify, which means "to make something more specific or precise."
This type of suffix transformation is known as a derivational suffix, which changes the meaning and sometimes the grammatical category of the base word. In this case, adding the -ify suffix transforms the adjective specific into a verb that describes the act of making something more specific.
Overall, the -ify suffix is a powerful tool in English, allowing speakers and writers to create new words that convey specific meanings and add depth and precision to their language.
to know more about speech click this link-
brainly.in/question/1771640
#SPJ11
Attack on Fort Sumter Marked Start of War (Pls help quick)
What did the United States Flag in the Southern Territory mean to the Confederates?
A. It emphasized the strength of North's military
B. It was a symbol of the North's dislike of slavery
C. It made the South feel as if they were never truly safe from the North.
D. It showed how the North was interfering in Southern affairs
Answer:
The United States Flag in the Southern Territory meant to the Confederates that:
D. It showed how the North was interfering in Southern affairs.
Explanation:
What advice does Christine give Nora about Dr. Rank?
In Henrik Ibsen's play A Doll's House, Christine advises Nora to be careful about her relationship with Dr. Rank, as he is secretly in love with her. Christine tells Nora that she knows about Dr. Rank's feelings and warns her not to lead him on or encourage him in any way.
Christine believes that Nora should not take advantage of Dr. Rank's love for her, as it would be unfair to him and could also potentially harm Nora's reputation. Ultimately, Christine's advice highlights the complexities and expectations surrounding relationships and gender roles in the play's society.might not be appropriate to discuss sensitive issues with him, considering their friendship and Dr. Rank's illness. Christine's advice is based on her concern for Nora's wellbeing and maintaining the boundaries of their relationships.
To know more about Christine click here:
brainly.com/question/23247324
#SPJ11
QUESTION 1
1 / OF8
The reader can tell from this episode that __________. A. Emilio's fall through the stage's trap door was part of the play
B. The shadow figure left because Amelia glared back at it
C. Something has upset Sanjay enough to talk to Amelia
D. Mr. Lindell had already suspected that Emilio might quit
Answer: A. Emilio's fall through the stage's trap door was part of the play
Explanation:
what old acquaintance shows up aboard the karnak? why is he aboard?
An old acquaintance named Simon Doyle shows up aboard the Karnak. He is aboard because he is on a honeymoon trip with his new wife, Jacqueline de Bellefort.
Colonel Race is an acquaintance of Hercule Poirot going back to before the events of Death on the Nile. In Death on the Nile, he comes aboard the Karnak Nile steamer because he has received word that there's a political agitator on board who is responsible for the murders of several people. Though he is not as brilliant at deduction as Poirot, he is a careful and methodical sidekick, helping Poirot to organize searches and interrogations on the steamer. Race’s role in the story is to be a foil to Poirot—he’s an intelligent character in his own right, but he mostly just serves to highlight how much more brilliant Poirot is by comparison.
To know more about Death on the Nile click here:
brainly.com/question/14387903
#SPJ11
Media mogul Ronald Morduck has ____ control of another tabloid.
answer choices.
A. made.
B. given.
C. found.
D. taken.
Your answer: D. taken Media mogul Ronald Morduck has taken control of another tabloid. This means that he has gained control or ownership of the tabloid, possibly by purchasing it or through a merger.
The sentence suggests that Ronald Morduck has gained control of a tabloid, which implies that he has taken control of it through some means. The verb "made" would suggest that he created the tabloid, which doesn't make sense in the context of the sentence. The verb "given" would suggest that he gave control of the tabloid to someone else, which also doesn't fit the context. The verb "found" would suggest that he discovered the tabloid, which doesn't make sense in the context of gaining control of it.
Therefore, the most appropriate verb in this context is "taken," which implies that Ronald Morduck has gained control of the tabloid through some means such as purchasing it or acquiring it in a merger.
To learn more about verb, refer:-
https://brainly.com/question/30515563
#SPJ11
But it's not really fair to make him leave all the time, it's his room too. What change should be made in sentence
One possible way to make the sentence more balanced would be to rephrase it as follows: "It's not fair to expect him to leave the room every time as it's also his space."
This version acknowledges the other person's right to use and occupy the room while also emphasizing the importance of fairness and mutual respect. It suggests that the current arrangement is not reasonable and that some changes may need to be made to ensure everyone's needs and preferences are taken into account.
Another alternative could be to propose a compromise, such as agreeing on specific times or days when each person can have the room to themselves or finding other ways to share the space and accommodate each other's activities and schedules. Ultimately, the key is to communicate openly and respectfully, listen to each other's concerns, and work together to find a solution that works for everyone.
Learn more about rephrasing at
brainly.com/question/28780048
#SPJ4
Write a paragraph explaining the conflict and the perspectives of the protagonist and antagonist. Review the example in the lesson.
Be sure your paragraph
mentions the title and author in the first sentence
briefly summarizes the plot
identifies the main conflict
describes the protagonist’s perspective on the conflict
provides a line of dialogue that the protagonist says to support your idea (text support)
describes the antagonist’s perspective of the conflict
provide a line of dialogue that the antagonist says to support your idea (text support)
includes a closing line to summarize the character’s views
uses correct grammar, punctuation, and spelling
the book this will be on is Freak the Mighty by Rooman Philbrick
Answer: Here is a Paragraph about your story...
"Freak the Mighty" by Rodman Philbrick is a story about the unlikely friendship between two boys, Max and Kevin, who are vastly different in size and intellect. Max is a tall, strong, and often misunderstood boy, while Kevin is a small, brilliant, and physically disabled boy. The two become inseparable, and together they embark on many adventures. The main conflict in the story is when Max's father, who has been in prison, is released and wants to reconnect with Max. The conflict arises when Max is torn between his desire to reconnect with his father and his loyalty to Kevin. Max believes that his father has changed and deserves a second chance, but Kevin is worried that Max's father will hurt him again. Max's perspective on the conflict is that his father has changed and deserves a second chance, as he believes that people can change. He says, "People can change. That's what redemption means." On the other hand, the antagonist, Max's father, believes that he deserves another chance and that Max should trust him. He says, "I paid my debt to society. I deserve another chance." In the end, Max realizes that Kevin was right, and his father has not changed. The story shows the importance of loyalty and friendship, even when faced with difficult decisions.
Hope i helped, good luck.
What does Dr. Rank say that alarms Nora?
Dr. Rank's statement that alarms Nora is when he reveals to her that he has been diagnosed with a terminal illness and has only a short time left to live. This news deeply affects Nora as she had formed a close friendship with Dr. Rank and is also aware of the societal implications of his illness.
Dr. Rank's revelation also puts Nora in a difficult position as she is torn between her loyalty towards her husband, Torvald, and her compassion towards Dr. Rank. She struggles with the idea of telling Torvald about Dr. Rank's illness and the possible consequences it could have on their relationship. Furthermore, Dr. Rank's illness serves as a metaphor for the underlying themes of the play, particularly the idea of societal norms and expectations. Dr. Rank's disease is a physical manifestation of the moral and ethical corruption that lies beneath the surface of the seemingly perfect Helmer family. It highlights the hypocrisy of society and the dangers of conforming to societal norms without questioning them. In conclusion, Dr. Rank's announcement of his illness is a pivotal moment in the play that serves as a catalyst for Nora's personal and emotional growth, while also shedding light on the broader societal issues that the play addresses.
Learn more about Nora's character here:
https://brainly.com/question/23444043
#SPJ11
can you guys please help me i need help:(
After making loud bird calls, the teacher sent Sam to the principal's office for interrupting class.
Which of the following can replace the bolded clause to correct the dangling modifier?
Sam was sent to the principal's office by the teacher for interrupting class
the class was interrupted, and Sam was sent to the principal's office by the teacher
the interruption was so bad that the teacher sent Sam to the principal's office
the principal was expecting Sam to be sent to her office by the teacher
The class was interrupted, and Sam was sent to the principal's office by the teacher is can replace the bolded clause to correct the dangling modifier. Thus, option (b) is correct.
This demonstrates that Sam was the one who disrupted class and was consequently disciplined by the teacher by sending him to the principal's office.
The other alternatives don't deal with the problem of the hanging modifier and don't offer succinct and understandable replacements for the original statement. For disrupting class, "Sam" was sent to the principal's office. The phrase in bold was "Sam."
As a result, the significance of the can replace the bolded clause to correct the dangling modifier are the aforementioned. Therefore, option (b) is correct.
Learn more about on clause, here:
https://brainly.com/question/19711531
#SPJ1
Read the excerpt from Act III, scene i of Romeo and Juliet.In Act III, scene i of Romeo and Juliet, Tybalt returns to the scene after he has killed Mercutio and fled. What motivates his return?
the anger he feels about the marriage
his desire to make peace with Romeo
the guilt he feels about killing Mercutio
his hatred for the entire Montague family
What motivates Tybalt's return to the scene after killing Mercutio is option D, his hatred for the entire Montague family, since Tybalt is a Capulet.
The return of TybaltIn William Shakespeare's tragedy "Romeo and Juliet," Tybalt is Juliet's cousin, and their families, the Capulets and Montagues, have been in a long-standing and violent feud. Tybalt, who harbors a deep hatred for the Montagues, is not interested in ending the feud, but instead actively feeds his animosity towards them.
This knowledge eliminates options B and C, and as Romeo and Juliet's marriage is a secret, Tybalt cannot be angry about it, ruling out option A. Therefore, after killing Romeo's friend Mercutio, Tybalt returns to the scene driven by his hatred for Romeo and his family, ultimately leading to his own demise at the hands of Romeo.
Therefore, option D is correct.
Learn more about Tybalt here:
https://brainly.com/question/26506181
#SPJ1
"Sugar Industry Funded Research to Prove it Didn't Contribute to Heart Disease" by Marcy Kreiter
SHORT RESPONSE
1. What are the topics that Marcy Kreiter discusses in the sugar industry article?
2. What tone or attitude does she express on the topics?
3. What action might Kreiter have implicitly wanted readers to take after reading this selection?
Please Help! Thank You!
Marcy Kreiter discusses the sugar industry's funding of research to disprove the link between sugar consumption and heart disease, the evidence that the industry influenced the research findings and conclusions, and the impact of these actions on public health.
Kreiter expresses a critical tone towards the sugar industry, highlighting the unethical behavior of funding research to mislead the public about the health effects of sugar consumption. She also emphasizes the importance of transparency and independent research to protect public health.
Kreiter may have implicitly wanted readers to be skeptical of industry-funded research and to advocate for more independent and transparent research practices. She may also want readers to be more aware of the potential influence of industry on scientific research and to consider the broader implications for public health.
*IG: whis.sama_ent
Please write 2 similes poems
Poem 1 directions:
Create a piece of writing based upon the structure of a chain of similes (or metaphors if you prefer).
The ending image ideally should be the same as the starting image. Your poem should have at least 8 lines.
Poem 2 direction:
Based upon the phenomenon of synthesia (mix-up of the senses), start with a feeling and follow the pattern shown below.
Title (a feeling)
PATTERN:
(a feeling) tastes like _____
The taste of ___ feels like ___
The feel of ____ smells like ___
The smell of ____ sounds like __
The sound of ___ looks like ___
(The feeling/tittle) ___ is a (the word/s in the last blank) ___
PLEASE HELP A GIRL OUT
Based upon the phenomenon of synthesia (mix-up of the senses), the poem that start with a feeling and follow the pattern shown above is given in the image.
What is the poem about?The 1st sonnet usessa chain of likenesses to make a arrangement of comparisons between diverse objects or encounters, eventually driving back to the beginning image. Each line starts with a comparison utilizing "like" to form a simile, and the following line builds on that comparison with a new likeness.
The 2nd lyric uses the marvel of synesthesia, in which the groups ended up crossed or mixed-up, to investigate the encounter of a specific feeling.
Learn more about poem from
https://brainly.com/question/9861
#SPJ1
When does Nora finally leave the sitting room?
Nora finally leaves the sitting room towards the end of Act III, after her husband Torvald has read the letter revealing her secret loan and forgery.
Nora has come to the realization that her marriage and her life have been based on illusions, and she decides to leave Torvald and their children to find her own identity and purpose in life.As she exits the room, she declares, "I have to make up my mind which is right - society or I"
Nora has been struggling with the expectations placed on her by society, as well as with the constraints of her own marriage and family life. As she learns more about the true nature of her relationship with Torvald and the secret that has been weighing on her for years, she realizes that she can no longer continue living the same way.
To know more about nora visit:
brainly.com/question/30241323
The complete question is :
From A Doll's house When does Nora finally leave the sitting room?
Answer:
Nora has been struggling with the expectations placed on her by society, as well as with the constraints of her own marriage and family life. As she learns more about the true nature of her relationship with Torvald and the secret that has been weighing on her for years, she realizes that she can no longer continue living the same way.
Explanation:
Eris describes herself as one of the lesser immortals. What phrase does she use to describe the three goddesses. Tell why this description is humorous
Zeus suddenly descends and kills Ares for disobeying his law, he spares Athena's life because she did not physically interfere as Ares did. We have a few tidbits regarding the follow-up to the great game from Ubisoft thanks to Jeff Grubb. When Ares disobeyed Zeus' command, he swiftly descended and killed him; nevertheless, he spared Athena's life because she did not physically interfere as Ares did.
The MPAA has given The Immortals an R rating for scenes of intense, gory violence. The following additional details regarding the film's subject matter are drawn from the remarks of various Canadian film classification boards: Frequent, overt acts of aggression.
The movie concludes with Acamas' vision of the future, in which Theseus leads a battle between gods and Titans.
Learn more about the Immortals here:
https://brainly.com/question/15072697
#SPJ1
peace is possible 5minutes speech
We must pursue peace if we are to lead society towards development and prosperity. Political power, economic stability, and cultural advancement will not be feasible without peace and concord.
Furthermore, it is essential for us to experience inner calm before spreading the idea to others. The upkeep of peace is everyone's task, not just one specific person. The thousands of wars between nations that have occurred throughout history at various levels and during all periods are documented in history.
Thus, we discovered that maintaining peace was crucial to ending these wars or even averting some of them. In reality, if you examine all religious texts and rituals, you will see that they all contain teachings.
Learn more about importance of peace here:
https://brainly.com/question/7382565
#SPJ1
Use the correct form of the verb.
1. I ____ (live) in Vlljandi but in Tallinn.
2. ____ you ____ (know) where my phone is?
3. I ____ (not, know) what this word ____ (mean) but I can look it up for you!
4. Sarah ____(love) comedies but she ____ (not, like) talk shows very much.
5. When father ____ (come) home, we always ____ (started) dinner.
6. How often ____ Brad ____ (ride) his new scooter?
7. What time ____ your young sister ____ (go) to bed in the evening.
8. Most students ____ (not, come) to school by bus, they ____ (come) on foot.
9. It ____ (snow) here every winter and everyone ____ (go) skiing.
10. Adults ____ (not, like) lollipops but kids just ____ (love) them.
Write a summary of “Back to My Own Country: An Essay
Answer:
"Back to My Own Country" is a personal essay written by Andrea Levy, a British-born writer of Jamaican descent. In the essay, Levy reflects on her experiences growing up in a predominantly white society and the impact that racism had on her sense of identity. She describes her visit to Jamaica, the birthplace of her parents, as a transformative experience that allowed her to reconnect with her cultural roots and gain a deeper understanding of her own identity. Levy's essay explores themes of race, identity, and belonging, and highlights the importance of understanding one's heritage and cultural background.
To analyze a character, the reader has to look first at the character's __________, then their _________, and finally, what others say.
To analyze a character, the reader has to look first at the character's actions and behavior, then their thoughts and motivations, and finally, what others say about them. By examining a character's actions and behavior, readers can gain insight into their personality, values, and beliefs.
This can help readers to understand why a character behaves in a particular way and how they might respond in different situations. Examining a character's thoughts and motivations is also essential to understanding their behavior. By delving into a character's innermost thoughts and feelings, readers can gain a deeper understanding of their motivations and the reasons behind their actions. Finally, considering what others say about a character can provide valuable insights into their reputation and how they are perceived by others. This can help readers to evaluate a character's true nature and to determine whether they are trustworthy or not. Overall, analyzing a character requires a careful consideration of their actions, thoughts, and reputation. By examining these different aspects of a character, readers can gain a comprehensive understanding of who they are and how they fit into the story.
Learn more about analyzing a character here:
https://brainly.com/question/634942
#SPJ11
10 At the end of the story, before Anna's leg breaks through the windshield, it thumps against the glass over and over. What effect does this have on the mood of the story? Support your answer with details from the text.
As the text notes, there is a lot of tension towards the conclusion of the story since Anna repeatedly knocks the glass, and then her leg goes through it, opening up a variety of possible outcomes.
The reader can assume that the author fainted, received a concussion, or perhaps died because the author just says that everything turned dark.
Because it is focused on the 1991 shooting death of Rodney King by police in Los Angeles, California, and the ensuing riots in the city, Anna Deavere Smith's monologue "Brother" is given that name. Smith explores the relationship between the black community and law enforcement in the monologue, as well as how structural and historical racism have influenced this relationship.
Racism is an ideology that some racial groups are superior to others and is a system of prejudice, discrimination, and oppression. Racism can manifest itself in a variety of ways, including overt acts of violence and discrimination as well as more covert bigotry and microaggressions.
To learn more about Anna's leg , visit:
https://brainly.com/question/15616288
#SPJ4
I need help with this question please.
The best rebuttal of the claim is that advertising brings down prices by enabling goods to be mass-produced.
What is a rebuttal?A rebuttal is a counterclaim to an idea touted by another person. In the passage, the argument is that advertising increases the prices of goods but a good rebuttal must show that advertising does the opposite which is reducing the prices of goods.
In the following sentence, we learn that advertising allows for mass production and a decrease in prices of products.
Learn more about rebuttal here:
https://brainly.com/question/24690335
#SPJ1
