Historians work to understand the circumstances of those living in the historical time period and Historians use a variety of economic and social sources to paint a picture of events the two statements correctly describe how historians place their arguments in historical context.
A scholar could be one who studies and writes about the past and is considered an authority on it. Historians are concerned with the continuous, organized narrative and analysis of past events with reference to the human race; further because of the study of all history in time. If the individual worries about events preceding written history, the individual is a historian of prehistory. Some historians are recognized by publications or coaching and experience. "Historian" became an expert occupation within the late nineteenth century as research universities were rising in European nations and elsewhere. During the Irving v sphenisciform seabird Books and Lipstadt trial, folks became aware that the court required to spot what was an "objective historian" within the same vein because the affordable person, and love the quality historically utilized in English law of "the man on the Clapham omnibus".
Learn more about Historians here: https://brainly.com/question/24466312
#SPJ1
According to this quote, what does America
need in the new century?
According to this quote, what the United States needs in the new century is to find new markets and create more jobs to produce new things in order to make the money circulate.
> That is what we understand after reading the quote of Albert Beveridge, written in 1898.
> He expressed that at that time, the US produced more than what citizens could consume.
> Beveridge said that there was an excess of workers and not enough jobs.
> That is why he quoted that the United States needed the creation of more jobs to produce new and different things.
> That action would help to circulate the money and move the US economy again.
We can conclude that the creation of jobs is a permanent necessity despite the moment in history, for nations to grow and prosper, investing in new infrastructure to move the economy and maintain stability in the country.
Learn more about this topic here:
https://brainly.com/question/18888652?referrer=searchResults
What are the implications of the statement "all men are created equal"?
Answer:
What he really meant was that the American colonists, as a people, had the same rights of self-government as other peoples, and hence could declare independence, create new governments, and assume their “separate and equal station” among other nations.
Answer:
it means me are the best I don't know lol
The ght of ourens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on count of sexan in Anandment ro me us Constitzen What was one way the constitutional amendment excerpted above helped advance the cause of gender equality? -) A) It gave women a greater opportunity to influence government B) It gave women new economic rights, such as property ownership. © It established the idea that women should contribute to all sectors of the economy. D) It contributed to a long-term decline in the number of men voting in elections.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Which of the following is a potential barrier to efficiency?
Direction
Resignation
Prediction
Deliberation
The correct answer is "Resignation."
What is a potential barrier to efficiency is "Resignation."
> It is not "Direction," because it provides the path to move to the desired place the organization wants to arrive.
> It is not "prediction," because it is a forecast of possible scenarios to be faced in the near future.
> It is not "Deliberation" because deliberation allows people to express their arguments in order to come up with a solution.
> That is why the correct answer is "Resignation."
> Resignation makes people assume a comfortable position in the company and they refrain to make their best effort.
> Let's have in mind that efficiency is "to make more with less."
> Efficiency is a key component to be effective in the corporate world.
We can conclude that to be efficient, employers need to be trained and constantly motivated to perform at the best of their capabilities. Otherwise, one of the risks is they can assume an attitude of resignation.
Learn more about this topic here:
https://brainly.com/question/20560983?referrer=searchResults
What about the Articles of Confederation do you think made it unsuccessful?
cuáles son las diferencias entre un país dominado y uno soberano?
Answer: Como sustantivos, la diferencia entre soberanía y dominio es que la soberanía es (de una política) el estado de hacer leyes y controlar los recursos sin la coerción de otras naciones, mientras que el dominio es el estado de ser dominante; de primordial importancia; supremacía.
Explanation:
Un país dominado es un país cuyas decisiones son tomadas por otro país, grupo u organización, el cual lo ha sometido en mayor o menor grado.
Un país soberano es aquel que puede tomar sus propias decisiones frente a cualquier otro país, grupo u organización del mundo y está en capacidad de responder a la coacción de cualquier país, grupo u organización al realizarse tal decisión soberana.
El grado de soberanía de un país queda descrito en el grado de independencia para tomar sus propias decisiones frente a cualquier otro país, grupo u organización del mundo y en la capacidad de responder a la coacción de otro país, grupo u organización al realizarse tal decisión.
En este sentido, un país dominado es un país cuyas decisiones son tomadas por otro país, grupo u organización, el cual lo ha sometido en mayor o menor grado, mientras que un país soberano es aquel que puede tomar sus propias decisiones frente a cualquier otro país, grupo u organización del mundo y está en capacidad de responder a la coacción de cualquier país, grupo u organización al realizarse tal decisión soberana.
Invitamos cordialmente a ver esta pregunta sobre soberanía: https://brainly.com/question/23858340
According to the two migration theories, how might people have settled the Americas?
Answer:
From 1932 to the 1990s, it was thought the first human migration to the Americas actually took place around 13,500 years ago, based on spear points discovered near Clovis, New Mexico. You may have heard of this referred to as the "Clovis-First Model." Over the last 20 years however, the discourse surrounding the story of the first Americans has come into a new light -- one that challenges the previously accepted theories and replaces them with even more shocking and exciting ones.
With these new ideas, the question regarding the story of the first Americans needed to be asked again: if those proverbial first Americans didn't populate the continent over the Bering Land Bridge, who were they, where did they come from and when, and how did they get here? It began in 1997 with the discovery of an archaeological site in Monte Verde, Chile, dating back to 14,500 years ago - a full millennium older than what was previously thought to be the first people in the new world, and indicating they settled much further south than expected.
Although there was strong debate regarding the dating of the Monte Verde findings, it brought up an interesting question: if humans settled in the Americas so much earlier than previously thought and traveled as far as South America, is it possible that these humans journeyed to the new world through a different route?
One radical theory claims it is possible that the first Americans didn't cross the Bering Land Bridge at all and didn't travel by foot, but rather by boat across the Atlantic Ocean. Though the evidence for this theory is minimal, proponents argue that the artifacts were developed by an earlier and still more ancient European group, known as the Solutrean culture. This style bears an uncanny resemblance to that of the Clovis tools found in the United States, which could suggest that humans may have entered America from the east over a route that has been dubbed the Atlantic Maritime route.
A somewhat more widely accepted maritime theory looks to modern cultural anthropology and linguistics, claiming a striking resemblance between the cultures of Australia, Southeast Asia, and South America. Support for this idea is found partially in the discovery of a 9,500 year old skeleton in Washington State. Dubbed the "Kennewick Man," the skeleton bears a strong physical resemblance to the Japanese Ainu people, suggesting that a pan-Pacific journey via boat might have brought the first Americans to our shores.
Explanation:
How did wars between European powers impact Tennessee?
Which areas are the main sources of immigration to the United States today? A. Africa and the Pacific Islands B. western and northern Europe C. Asia and North America D. southern and eastern Europe
Answer:
I think is southern and eastern Europe. but i could be wrong..
Explanation:
What happened to the cotton club in the 1920s
it closed for selling liquor
hope it helps
Select the correct answer. How are the Declaration of Sentiments and the Declaration of Independence similar?
A. They both state that the people they are representing deserve basic rights.
B. They both were created to give the government authority over the people.
C. They both were created to help individuals around the world live in peace.
D. They both state that all individuals were created by the same creator.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
They are basically the same thing just under different names.
The both Declaration of Sentiments and the Declaration of Independence proclaim that such individuals they symbolize are entitled to basic rights.
Both "The Declaration of Independence" and "The Declaration of Sentiments Urging Comparable Equality for Women" begin with the phrase "When, in the span of development circumstances, it becomes essential," and then provide a list of concerns after a few lines.
So,
Option "A" is the correct answer to the following question.
Learn more:
https://brainly.com/question/18315794?referrer=searchResults
How do you think the formal
separation of the Roman Catholic
Church and the Eastern Orthodox
Church would affect the future
development of Europe?
Answer:
The Byzantine split with Roman Catholicism came about when Pope Leo III crowned Charlemagne, King of the Franks, as Holy Roman Emperor in 800. From the Byzantine viewpoint, this was a slap to the Eastern Emperor and the Byzantine Empire itself — an empire that had withstood barbarian invasions and upheld the faith for centuries.
Explanation:
In the end, Pope Leo and Patriarch Michael excommunicated each other and their respective churches. But more than 900 years later, in 1965, Pope Paul VI and Patriarch Athenagoras I of Constantinople removed the mutual excommunications.
Why did Thomas Jefferson change property to the pursuit of happiness in the Declaration
Answer:
“The pursuit of happiness” is the most famous phrase in the Declaration of Independence. Conventional history and popular wisdom attribute the phrase to the genius of Thomas Jefferson when in an imaginative leap, he replaced the third term of John Locke’s trinity, “life, liberty, and property.” It was a felicitous, even thrilling, substitution. Yet the true history and philosophical meaning of the famous phrase are apparently unknown.
In an article entitled “The Pursuit of Happiness,” posted at the Huffington Post July 4, 2007, Daniel Brook summed up what most of us learned in school: “The eighteenth-century British political philosopher John Locke wrote that governments are instituted to secure people's rights to ‘life, liberty, and property.’ And in 1776, Thomas Jefferson begged to differ. When he penned the Declaration of Independence, ratified on the Fourth of July, he edited out Locke's right to ‘property’ and substituted his own more broad-minded, distinctly American concept: the right to ‘the pursuit of happiness.’ "
Familiar as all this sounds, Brook is wrong on three points. John Locke lived from 1634 to 1704, making him a man of the seventeenth century, not the eighteenth. Jefferson did not substitute his “own” phrase. Nor is that concept “distinctly American.” It is an import, and Jefferson borrowed it.
Explanation:
Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness" is a well-known phrase in the United States Declaration of Independence. The phrase gives three examples of the unalienable rights which the Declaration says have been given to all humans by their creator, and which governments are created to protect. Like the other principles in the Declaration of Independence, this phrase is not legally binding, but has been widely referenced and seen as an inspiration for the basis of government.
Answer:
“The pursuit of happiness” is the most famous phrase in the Declaration of Independence. Conventional history and popular wisdom attribute the phrase to the genius of Thomas Jefferson when in an imaginative leap, he replaced the third term of John Locke’s trinity, “life, liberty, and property.” It was a felicitous, even thrilling, substitution. Yet the true history and philosophical meaning of the famous phrase are apparently unknown.
Explanation:
there is theanswer i hope it helps
When the English and Spanish explorers came in contact with Indigenous People, both groups of explorers________________________.
plz help i will mark u brainliest plz plz help me plzzzz 15 points
Answer:
......planned to Christianized the American Indians and to expand their colonies during that time.
When the English and Spanish explorers came in contact with Indigenous People, both groups of explorers tried to conquer the indegenious people.
PROOF:-This is evident as they tried different methods to conquer each other and the Spanish were the rudest, but they ended up doing the same thing. They started conquering the territories and slaving the natives to get the land for themselves. Europeans were conquerors and fighters as well as indegenious people.
However, they had better technology and weapons. So, they won and managed to establish their will to exploit the new world to grant their Europeans countries the wealth they gathered from the new continent. Both looked for wealth when they traveled and found the America, still, their actions got countered eventually.
Hope it helps you....( Answered by Benjemin )
The process for creating the US Constitution began in 1787 with the convening of the . Delegates debated and argued over the structure of the new government, including how representation would work. The appealed to Southern states because it meant they could count enslaved people in their population, even though the enslaved people couldn’t vote.
Answer:
the Constitutional Convention is right most likely let me know if im wrong
Explanation:
The cycle for making the US Constitution started in 1787 with the meeting of the Constitutional Convention. Delegates discussed and squabbled about the design of the new government, including how portrayal would work. The Three-fifths Compromise spoke to Southern states since it implied they could include oppressed individuals in their populace, despite the fact that the subjugated individuals couldn't cast a ballot.
What was the principal reason for the Constitutional Convention of 1787?The Constitutional Convention occurred from May 14 to September 17, 1787, in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The mark of the occasion was to conclude the way that America would have been administered. Albeit the Convention had been authoritatively called to amend the current Articles of Confederation, many agents had a lot greater plans.
What was the goal of the agents to the Constitutional Convention?The first intention was to correct the Articles of Confederation to frame a more grounded presidential part of the government. This plan was supplanted by the representatives' assurance to compose another archive, the Constitution of the United States.
Learn more about US Constitution here
https://brainly.com/question/453546
#SPJ2
7
16
24
32
40
48
55
62
68
76
81
88
100
115
124
135
149
159
The Cyber Bully
Every time I got on the school
bus, I felt sick. I got butterflies in my
stomach. I had just moved to a new
school. No one on the bus talked to
me. I was sure I would never make
any new friends. And I got in trouble
right off the bat, the first week.
It all started when Mr. Evers, my
teacher, took us to the computer
lab. I was logging in when I noticed
Corey, my classmate, watching my
fingers on the keyboard as I typed.
Then I saw Corey use my password to log into his computer!
I almost told Mr. Evers, but didn't want to be a tattle-tale who tells on
a classmate. After all, I am the new kid.
A few minutes later, Mr. Evers called me to his desk.
He asked, "What is this e-mail you sent me?" I read it but could
not believe my eyes! I could not have sent that.
Then I realized Corey sent it. He was using my e-maill
Test Thursday
Homework due frich
I was wORT
decided not
He said, "I a:
school today."
"Too bad."
bullying me if
I told him the
e-mail. Mr.
someone els
I was stil
telling Mr.
But, on
two kids
me. They
heard ab
could ha
have to
all, wly
smile
2. Why is Aaron wo
A. Reread the passage and answer the questions.
1. What problem must Aaron face?
3. When Corey
the solution
Answer:
cyber bullying (1).being reported (3)
Who was considered Judaisms greatest prophet?
Answer:
Moses was considered Judaism's
greatest prophet
What was the governing relationship between the colonies and the British crown?
Answer:
Hey mate.....
Explanation:
This is ur answer....
The proprietary colonies were established under charters from the Crown, and the companies appointed the governors. In the Crown colonies the governors were appointed by the King or Queen and were responsible to the monarch for governing the colonists. Whereas royal colonies belonged to the Crown, proprietary and charter colonies were granted by the Crown to private interests. Control over a charter or corporate colony was granted to a joint-stock company, such as the Virginia Company.
Hope it helps!
Brainliest pls!
Follow me! ;)
Answer and Explanation:
Do I assume we are talking American rebellion here , because the British Empire was very, very much larger then a few settlements on the shores of an unexplored and unknown continent. There were an almost infinite number of places throughout the World were there could have been tension between British colonists and whatever local power there was.
Even in America, the actual native peoples , colloquially known as ‘Red Indians’ seem to have been happy with the British Government; at least they signed, and both sides kept, treaties. Very noticeably the Yankees did not honour treaties with the red man. It seems to have been the incomers, the settlers, who were happy not to be British citizens, perhaps because in part they were renegades from home rule in Britain. A similar phenomenon can be observed today in some of the people in Ireland. At least both the British and the Native Americans appear to have respected each other, our battle cry as eleven year olds running onto the football pitch was ‘Geronimo’ which I can only think was Hollywood influence. Did you know that U.K. is perhaps the only country in the World, maybe India as well, where the Saturday juvenile audience cheers on the red men in Western movies? No ‘hat colour’ coding (white for heroes, black for villains) , for us in Yorkshire. I was once watching that fabulous piece of hokum “Crimson pirate” at the village flea pit when Maureen O’Hara, heroine, implored Burt Lancaster, villain, to “Come and join us” and the whole audience broke out in the Sally Army hymn.
It is possible that in USA the entire audience sits well mannerdly in silence during Hollywood Western movies, but I, as a Yorkshireman, find that hard to swallow.
Why does the federal government have a minimal role in education? What is its role? What are
some of the challenges with the current structure of government for education?
Explanation:
Speculation abounds on new priorities and the fate of current programs and policies in the U.S. Department of Education under the direction of Betsy DeVos, Donald Trump’s nominee for education secretary. One thing is certain, there will be changes in the offing under the new administration, which is as averse to government regulation as it is inclined toward free market forces, which, in education, includes for-profit charter schools and vouchers.
Noting that much of what has been written on education policy involves where the federal government should stay out of education governance, the Brookings Institution sought to initiate a public conversation on what the federal government can and should do. The result is Memos to the President on the Future of Education Policy, a series of 12 articles written by education leaders and policymakers with diverse perspectives that are intended to make “an affirmative case for an important but limited federal role” in education policy.
The preface to the series, A principled federal role in PreK-12 education, explores the history and evolution of federal policy around public education in the period soon after the Revolutionary War. The authors begin in 1791 with ratification of the Tenth Amendment, which gave states jurisdiction over all powers not reserved for the federal government in the U.S. Constitution, including education, and continues to current programs aimed at providing equal access to quality education for all students regardless of race, income, gender, ethnicity, language, and immigration status.
Based on what you have read, which of the following statements are correct? Check all of the boxes that apply.
A) Some scientists think the first migrants to the Americas came by boat.
B) Some scientists claim migrants could not come by land because there was no land bridge.
C) Some scientists think the first migrants to the Americas came by crossing a land bridge.
D) Most scientists believe the first migrants came to North America from Asia.
E)Most scientists believe the first migrants came to North America from South America.
F) Scientists have no theories about how the first migrants came to the Americas.
Answer:
Option D is correct because the first wave of humans came from Steppe region of Russia to Alaska.
What is the northern most colony of the Middle Colonies?
Answer:
The Massachusetts Bay Colony
Explanation:
Which event made people question whether New Mexicans would be loyal to Spain or Mexico over the United States
A. The revolt of 1847
B. The Spanish-American war
C. The Mexican-American war
D. The civil war
Answer:
b
Explanation:
The Spanish- American War made people question whether New Mexicans would be loyal to Spain or Mexico over the United States. Thus, the correct answer is option B.
What was the Spanish- American War?Following the USS Maine's internal explosion in Cuba's Havana Harbour, which prompted American involvement in the Cuban War of Independence, the Spanish-American War got underway. The conflict culminated in the United States becoming the dominating nation in the Caribbean and in the conquest of Spanish territory in the Pacific.
It prompted American participation in the Philippine Revolution, which ultimately sparked the Philippine-American War. New Mexicans desired to demonstrate their allegiance to the United States at the turn of the 20th century. By enlisting in Teddy Roosevelt's Rough Riders to participate in the Spanish American War, they discovered their chance.
Therefore, option B is the appropriate answer.
To learn more on Spanish-American war, here:
https://brainly.com/question/2827989
#SPJ2
3 facts about the yellow civilizations?
Answer: the yellow river is often called the cradle of Chinese civilization, and it's drainage basin is the third largest in china, and it is more than 3000 years old
giving brainliest
How did the Jews practice their religion during the exile to Babylon.
The practiced circumcision, and substituted prayers for former ritual sacrifices in the Temple.
1.What is manifest Destiny? 2.What is the Dawes Act?
Answer:
1 : Manifest destiny was a widely held cultural belief in the 19th-century United States that American settlers were destined to expand across North America
2: The Dawes Act of 1887 regulated land rights on tribal territories within the United States.
Explanation:
dawns act- It authorized the President of the United States to subdivide Native American tribal communal landholdings into allotments for Native American heads of families and individuals.
which democratic ideals are reflected in this passage? check all that apply
the right to have fair trial
the right to serve in government
the right to live in a free society
the right to have individual liberties
the right to pursue dreams
Answer:
C - the right to live in a free society
D - the right to have individual liberties
E - the right to pursue dreams
Explanation:
got it right one edge 2022
What are the political, economic, geographical, and social Causes of exploration
I need this please
it will helpful for yoy♥️
the first nation where a slave uprising was a successful was what?
The Haitian Revolution!
The Haitian Revolution began as a slave insurrection and culminated in the establishment of a sovereign state. The major insurgency began in 1791 in the important French colony of Saint-Domingue. In part inspired by the egalitarian ideology of the French Revolution, African slaves staged an organized revolt, murdering hundreds of whites and torching sugar plantations on their way to seizing control of Saint-northern Domingue's provinces. The disturbance would last until February 1794, when the French government declared the abolition of slavery in all of its domains.And when Napoleon Bonaparte's imperial soldiers seized Louverture in 1802 and sought to reintroduce slavery, the former slaves organized a resistance movement once again!
Amazing, right?
Why was the Magna Carta created?
Answer:
magna is a way that you follow over ther.
Explanation:
magna was created because to help people of all over the country.If there was no magna we cannot live.
Until modern times, most countries were ruled by
democratic government
local villagers
a confederation
some form of authoritarian government
