The gauge pressure at point 2 is 98100 Pa or 9.81 x[tex]10^4[/tex] Pa, which is equivalent to 6.97 x[tex]10^4[/tex] Pa when rounded to two significant figures.
Step 1: Identification of the given data:
- Elevation at point 1 (h1) = 10.0 m
- Elevation at points 2 and 3 (h2 = h3) = 2.00 m
- Cross-sectional area at point 2 (A2) = 0.0480 [tex]m^2[/tex]
- Cross-sectional area at point 3 (A3) = 0.0160 [tex]m^2[/tex]
Step 2: Determination of the discharge rate:
As mentioned earlier, the discharge rate (Q) is given by Q = A2 * v2, and since the velocity at point 2 (v2) is negligible, the discharge rate will be 0.
Therefore, the discharge rate is 0 cubic meters per second.
Step 3: Determination of the gauge pressure at point 2:
To find the gauge pressure at point 2, we'll use Bernoulli's equation:
P1 + (1/2)ρ[tex]v1^2[/tex] + ρgh1 = P2 + (1/2)ρ[tex]v2^2[/tex] + ρgh2
Since the velocity at point 2 (v2) is negligible, the term (1/2)ρ[tex]v2^2[/tex] can be ignored.
The equation simplifies to:
Patm + ρgh1 = P2 + ρgh2
We want to find the gauge pressure at point 2, so we'll subtract the atmospheric pressure (Patm) from P2:
[tex]P_g_a_u_g_e[/tex] = P2 - Patm
Now let's substitute the given values into the equation:
[tex]P_g_a_u_g_e[/tex] = (Patm + ρgh1) - Patm
[tex]P_g_a_u_g_e[/tex] = ρgh1
Plugging in the values:
[tex]P_g_a_u_g_e[/tex] = (1000 kg/m^3) * (9.81 [tex]m/s^2[/tex]) * (10.0 m)
[tex]P_g_a_u_g_e[/tex] = 98100 Pa
For more such information on: pressure
https://brainly.com/question/28012687
#SPJ8
which action would a chemist most likely take to determine how substances in a fuel affect the types
A 50-kg ice skater turns a bend at 7 m/sec. If the radius of the curve is 5 m, what is the centripetal force in Newtons provided by the friction between the blade of the skate and the ice?
The centripetal force in Newtons provided by the friction between the blade of the skate and the ice is 490 N
How do i determine the centripetal force?The following data were obtained from the question:
Mass of ice skater (m) = 50 KgVelocity (v) = 7 m/sRadius (r) = 5 metersCentripetal force (F) =?The centripetal force can be obtained as illustrated below:
F = mv²/r
= (50 × 7²) / 5
= (50 × 49) / 5
= 2450 / 5
= 490 N
Thus, we can concluded that the centripetal force is 490 N
Learn more about centripetal force:
https://brainly.com/question/14021112
#SPJ1
Which correctly describes latent heat?
A. The heat of molecules that are under pressure
B. The heat held inside of ice crystals colder than -2°C
C. The heat absorbed or lost by a substance while it's changing state
D. The heat used to change the temperature of a liquid
Option C. The heat absorbed or lost by a substance while it's changing state correctly describes latent heat
Latent heat is the heat absorbed or lost by a substance while it is changing state.
The latent heat is a type of heat that is transferred during phase change, i.e., while a substance undergoes a change of state.
For example, when ice melts into liquid water, or when liquid water evaporates into water vapor, heat is absorbed from the surroundings.
Latent heat is not associated with a temperature change; rather, it's associated with a change of state.
For instance, the temperature of water remains at 100°C while boiling.
When water is boiling, the latent heat of vaporization is absorbed and utilized to break the hydrogen bonds holding water molecules together to change water from the liquid phase to the gaseous phase.
When the water is boiling, adding more heat won't increase the water's temperature, instead, the extra heat will be absorbed to change the phase of water molecules.
Therefore, the correct answer to the given question is option C: The heat absorbed or lost by a substance while it is changing state.
For more questions on latent heat
https://brainly.com/question/10765874
#SPJ8
Samir is waiting for a slow reaction to finish. What is the best way to make the reaction go faster?
Question 12 options:
Put it in the fridge where it is cold
Cover it with a blanket so it's dark
Warm it up on the stove
There is nothing you can do to change the speed of the reaction
Answer:
To make a reaction go faster, there are several methods that can be employed depending on the type of reaction and the reactants involved. One common method is to increase the temperature of the reaction mixture, as this typically increases the rate of reaction by providing more energy to the reacting molecules. Another method is to increase the concentration of one or more reactants, as this increases the likelihood of collisions between them. Adding a catalyst can also speed up a reaction by providing an alternative pathway with lower activation energy.
In the case of Samir's slow reaction, warming it up on the stove may be the best option to make it go faster. However, it is important to note that not all reactions can be sped up by simply increasing temperature or concentration, and some reactions may require specific catalysts or conditions to proceed at a reasonable rate. Additionally, it is important to consider safety precautions when attempting to speed up a reaction, as some reactions may become more dangerous at higher temperatures or concentrations.
MARK AS BRAINLIEST!
Angle R in the picture below is the angle of...
The angle I can rightly be called the angle of reflection.
What is the law of angle of reflection?The incident ray, the reflected ray, and the normal all reside on the same plane, according to the angles of reflection. This suggests that reflection may occur when two angles are in the same plane as the normal.
The angle I and depicted can appropriately be referred to as the angle of reflection in light of the aforementioned information.
Lastly, it is obvious from the image that angle I is the angle of reflection.
Learn more about reflection at:
brainly.com/question/12029226
#SPJ1
A team of engineers is doing a cost-benefit analysis to determine whether they should develop new technology. What are two risks to human health they should include in their analysis?
A. Increase in human diseases
B. Loss of habitat
C.damage to an ecosystem
D. Reduced workplace safety
E. Using up natural resources
A team of engineers is doing a cost-benefit analysis to determine whether they should develop new technology. Two risks to human health they should include in their analysis are: . Increase in human diseases and Reduced workplace safety.
The correct answer is option A and D.
When conducting a cost-benefit analysis for the development of new technology, it is essential to consider potential risks to human health. Here are two risks that should be included in the analysis:
1. Increase in human diseases:
New technology can bring about various health risks, including an increase in human diseases. Technological advancements often involve the introduction of novel materials, chemicals, or processes that may have adverse effects on human health. For example, the use of certain chemicals in manufacturing processes or the emissions from new machinery can lead to respiratory problems, allergic reactions, or long-term health issues. These risks should be thoroughly assessed, taking into account the potential exposure levels, the toxicity of the substances involved, and the susceptibility of the population.
2. Reduced workplace safety:
Introducing new technology may also impact workplace safety. While advancements can enhance productivity and efficiency, they can also introduce new hazards or change the nature of existing risks. For instance, automated systems or robotics might increase the risk of injuries or accidents if not properly designed, operated, or maintained. The analysis should consider the potential for occupational hazards, such as physical injuries, exposure to harmful substances, ergonomic issues, or psychological stressors. Proper training, safety protocols, and risk mitigation measures should be implemented to minimize these risks.
It is important to note that while risks to human health are significant considerations, a comprehensive cost-benefit analysis should also examine other factors such as economic impacts, environmental sustainability, social implications, and ethical considerations. The analysis should aim to strike a balance between the potential benefits of the new technology and the risks it poses to human health and overall well-being. Inclusion of these risks allows for a more comprehensive evaluation of the feasibility and desirability of developing the new technology.
For more such information on: technology
https://brainly.com/question/7788080
#SPJ8
a question was asked by a teacher to a student. She gave the student a jumbled word and told him to make words out of it. The jumbled word is gzeysktqix. Now you know what to do. see ya!
When the teacher asked the student to make words out of the jumbled word gzeysktqix, the student was being tested on his ability to unscramble words. Unscrambling words is the process of taking a word or series of letters that are out of order and rearranging them to form a word that makes sense.
When trying to unscramble a word, it is important to look for any patterns that can help identify smaller words within the jumbled letters. This can help make the process easier and quicker. For example, in the jumbled word gzeysktqix, one might notice that the letters "sktqix" appear together.
This could indicate that these letters could potentially form a word. By looking at the remaining letters, one could notice that the letters "g", "z", "e", and "y" could also form smaller words. After some rearranging, the letters can be unscrambled to form the words "sky", "zig", "sex", and "yet". These are just a few examples, as there are likely many other words that can be formed from this jumbled word.
For more such questions on unscramble words, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/28555227
#SPJ8
The thermal conductivity of copper at 300 K is 470.4 Wm ¹K¹. Calculate the electrical conductivity of copper at 300 K (L-2.45 X10 WOK -2)
The electrical conductivity of copper at 300 K is 0.566 x 10⁸ Sm⁻¹.
Thermal conductivity and electrical conductivity are two different physical quantities used to describe the ability of a material to conduct heat and electricity respectively. Copper is a metal known to be an excellent conductor of both heat and electricity.
The relationship between thermal conductivity and electrical conductivity in copper is given by the Wiedemann-Franz Law, which states that the ratio of the electrical conductivity to thermal conductivity of a metal is proportional to its temperature.
To calculate the electrical conductivity of copper at 300 K, we will make use of the Wiedemann-Franz Law. The law states that:σ / κ = L T Where σ is the electrical conductivity, κ is the thermal conductivity, L is the Lorenz number, and T is the temperature of the material.
Substituting the values given in the problem, we get:σ / 470.4 = (2.45 x 10⁻⁸) x 300σ = (2.45 x 10⁻⁸) x 300 x 470.4σ = 0.566 x 10⁸ Sm⁻¹Therefore, the electrical conductivity of copper at 300 K is 0.566 x 10⁸ Sm⁻¹.
For more such questions on conductivity, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/24943129
#SPJ8
what are the factors affecting center of mass in an object
Imagine you are riding on a yacht in the ocean and traveling at 20 mph. You then hit a golf ball at 100 mph from the deck of the yacht. You see the ball move away from you at 100mph, while a person standing on a nearby beach would observe your golf ball traveling at 120 mph (20 mph + 100 mph).
Now imagine you are aboard the Hermes spacecraft traveling at 0.1c (1/10 the speed of light) past Mars and shine a laser from the front of the ship. You would see the light traveling at c (the speed of light) away from your ship.
An observer on the spacecraft would see the light beam moving away from the ship at the speed of light, while an observer on Mars would also see the light beam moving away from the ship at the speed of light. This is because the speed of light is always constant, regardless of the motion of the observer or the light source.
When the ball is hit from the deck of the yacht at 100 mph, it is moving at a speed relative to the yacht.
Since the yacht is moving at 20 mph, the ball would appear to be moving away from the yacht at 100 mph.
This is because the speed of the ball relative to the yacht is 100 mph, while the speed of the yacht relative to the ground is 20 mph.
Therefore, the total speed of the ball relative to the ground would be the sum of the speed of the yacht and the speed of the ball relative to the yacht, which is 120 mph (20 mph + 100 mph).
Now let's consider the Hermes spacecraft traveling at 0.1c past Mars and shining a laser from the front of the ship.
According to the theory of relativity, the speed of light is always the same for all observers, regardless of their motion or the motion of the light source.
So, regardless of the speed of the spacecraft, the light beam would travel away from the ship at the speed of light, c.
An observer on the spacecraft would see the light beam moving away from the ship at the speed of light, while an observer on Mars would also see the light beam moving away from the ship at the speed of light.
This is because the speed of light is always constant, regardless of the motion of the observer or the light source.
In summary, the theory of relativity tells us that the speed of light is always the same for all observers, regardless of their motion or the motion of the light source.
This means that the speed of light is a fundamental constant of the universe, and it plays a crucial role in our understanding of the laws of physics.
For more questions on light
https://brainly.com/question/11666011
#SPJ8
Usually, we do a
when a population is hard to study, for some reason.
Usually, we use sampling when a population is hard to study, for some reason.
Sampling is a technique commonly employed in research and statistics when it is impractical or impossible to study an entire population directly. It involves selecting a subset, or sample, from the population and using the information gathered from the sample to make inferences about the entire population. This is done with the assumption that the sample is representative of the population and that the findings from the sample can be generalized to the larger population.
There are several reasons why a population might be difficult to study comprehensively. One reason is the size of the population. For example, if the population of interest is the entire world or a country, it would be practically impossible to study each individual in the population due to logistical constraints and limited resources. In such cases, sampling allows researchers to gather information from a smaller, manageable subset of the population.
Another reason for using sampling is when the population is dispersed or geographically scattered. If the population is spread out across a wide area, it can be challenging and costly to reach and collect data from every individual. Sampling allows researchers to select representative individuals or clusters from different regions, making data collection more feasible.
Additionally, there are cases where the population is inaccessible or hard to reach due to privacy concerns or ethical considerations. For example, if the population consists of individuals with certain medical conditions or sensitive personal information, it may be challenging to obtain consent or access to the entire population. In such cases, researchers can use sampling methods to obtain data from a subset of individuals who are willing to participate and meet the necessary criteria.
In summary, sampling is a valuable tool when studying populations that are hard to access, too large, or dispersed. It allows researchers to gather relevant data from a representative subset of the population and make valid inferences about the larger population, despite the challenges posed by studying the population as a whole.
For more such information on: sampling
https://brainly.com/question/13219833
#SPJ8
The question probable may be:
Usually, we use when a population is hard to study, for some reason.
Part C Now, grab Tracker’s protractor tool (the green angle in the video frame) and measure the angle of incidence and the angle of refraction for the frame numbers specified in the table below. Hints: To advance the video a frame at a time, use the step buttons on the right. Position the vertex of the protractor exactly at the origin of the coordinate axis. Move the arms of the protractor so that one arm is on the vertical axis (above or below, as appropriate) and the other on the light ray.
In order to measure the angle of incidence and the angle of refraction using Tracker's protractor tool (the green angle in the video frame), the following steps should be followed:
Step 1: Open the video in Tracker software.
Step 2: Click on the "Measure" button on the toolbar at the top of the software.
Step 3: From the dropdown menu, select "Angle".
Step 4: Click on the "protractor tool" icon (the green angle in the video frame).
Step 5: Position the vertex of the protractor exactly at the origin of the coordinate axis and move the arms of the protractor so that one arm is on the vertical axis (above or below, as appropriate) and the other on the light ray.
Step 6: Measure the angle of incidence and the angle of refraction for the frame numbers specified in the table below by using the step buttons on the right to advance the video a frame at a time.
Step 7: Record the measured angles in the table below. Note that the angle of incidence should be measured on the incident ray (the ray that is coming from the left), and the angle of refraction should be measured on the refracted ray (the ray that is coming from the right).In conclusion, by following these steps, one can measure the angle of incidence and the angle of refraction using Tracker's protractor tool.
For more question Tracker’s protractor tool.
https://brainly.com/question/16772121
#SPJ8
The picture shows two solutions of salt water. Which solution is more concentrated (has a higher concentration)?
Question 15 options:
The first solution is more concentrated
The second solution is more concentrated
The solutions have the same concentration.
In order to determine which of the two solutions of salt water is more concentrated, we need to first understand what concentration means and how it is measured. Concentration refers to the amount of solute dissolved in a given amount of solvent. It is typically measured in units of mass per volume, such as grams per liter (g/L) or milligrams per milliliter (mg/mL). so The second solution is more concentrated
When comparing the concentration of two solutions, the one with a higher concentration has more solute dissolved in the same amount of solvent. Therefore, in the picture provided, we can determine which solution is more concentrated by looking at the relative amounts of solute in each solution.If the solutions have the same concentration, then they must have the same amount of solute dissolved in the same amount of solvent. From the picture, we can see that both solutions are in the same size container and have the same amount of solvent (water) in them. Therefore, we can conclude that they have the same concentration of salt.The amount of solute dissolved in a solution can be increased by either adding more solute or by reducing the amount of solvent. If we were to add more salt to one of the solutions, we would increase the concentration of that solution. Alternatively, if we were to evaporate some of the water from one of the solutions, we would reduce the amount of solvent and increase the concentration of that solution.
For more question concentrated
https://brainly.com/question/26288031
#SPJ8
